CVE-2026-100391 (GCVE-0-2026-100391)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 20:13 – Updated: 2026-09-25 20:13
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 Server-Side Request Forgery via Incomplete Validation
Summary
MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy routes due to missing and incomplete destination validation in the d query parameter. Remote attackers can supply arbitrary internal URLs including loopback and cloud metadata endpoints to read full responses from the proxy server.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy/comm… | patch |
| https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy/blob… | technical-description |
| https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mediaflow-pr… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mhdzumair | mediaflow-proxy |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.4.9
(semver)
|
guessed |
Date Public
2026-09-06 00:00
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/mediaflow-proxy",
"product": "mediaflow-proxy",
"vendor": "mhdzumair",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dilshod Gofurov"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy routes due to missing and incomplete destination validation in the d query parameter. Remote attackers can supply arbitrary internal URLs including loopback and cloud metadata endpoints to read full responses from the proxy server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T20:13:12.968Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy/commit/99f4af1153d4766420a098a232183cba1efdc560"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy/blob/2.4.9/mediaflow_proxy/routes/proxy.py#L532-L569"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 Server-Side Request Forgery via Incomplete Validation",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mediaflow-proxy-through-2.4.9-server-side-request-forgery-via-incomplete-validation"
}
],
"title": "MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 Server-Side Request Forgery via Incomplete Validation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-100391",
"datePublished": "2026-09-25T20:13:12.968Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-25T19:47:56.294Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T20:13:12.968Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-100391",
"date": "2026-09-27",
"epss": "0.00309",
"percentile": "0.21274"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/mediaflow-proxy",
"product": "mediaflow-proxy",
"vendor": "mhdzumair",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy routes due to missing and incomplete destination validation in the d query parameter. Remote attackers can supply arbitrary internal URLs including loopback and cloud metadata endpoints to read full responses from the proxy server."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-100391",
"lastModified": "2026-09-25T21:17:22.800",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 4.2,
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-25T21:17:22.800",
"references": [
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"url": "https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy"
},
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"url": "https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy/blob/2.4.9/mediaflow_proxy/routes/proxy.py#L532-L569"
},
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"url": "https://github.com/mhdzumair/mediaflow-proxy/commit/99f4af1153d4766420a098a232183cba1efdc560"
},
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mediaflow-proxy-through-2.4.9-server-side-request-forgery-via-incomplete-validation"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…