CVE-2025-68775 (GCVE-0-2025-68775)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-13 15:28 – Updated: 2026-08-05 12:11
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket
When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the
handshake_net->hn_requests list, but it is still present in the
handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.
If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,
then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming
HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn't set in req->hr_flags, we'll continue
processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on
the sock and a refcount underflow occurs.
This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if
the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn't
follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd. When the
timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers
a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport(). When the timeout is
hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via
xs_tls_handshake_sync().
Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel
path so duplicate cancels can be detected.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
Assigner
References
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae , < 011ae80c49d9bfa5b4336f8bd387cd25c7593663
(git)
Affected: 3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae , < e1641177e7fb48a0a5a06658d4aab51da6656659 (git) Affected: 3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae , < 3c330f1dee3cd92b57e19b9d21dc8ce5970b09be (git) Affected: 3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae , < 15564bd67e2975002f2a8e9defee33e321d3183f (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
6.4
Unaffected: 0 , < 6.4 (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.120 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.64 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.18.3 , ≤ 6.18.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.19 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/handshake/request.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "011ae80c49d9bfa5b4336f8bd387cd25c7593663",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e1641177e7fb48a0a5a06658d4aab51da6656659",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3c330f1dee3cd92b57e19b9d21dc8ce5970b09be",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "15564bd67e2975002f2a8e9defee33e321d3183f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/handshake/request.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.120",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.64",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.120",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.64",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket\n\nWhen a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the\nhandshake_net-\u003ehn_requests list, but it is still present in the\nhandshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.\n\nIf a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,\nthen remove_pending() will return false... and assuming\nHANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn\u0027t set in req-\u003ehr_flags, we\u0027ll continue\nprocessing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on\nthe sock and a refcount underflow occurs.\n\nThis can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if\nthe SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn\u0027t\nfollow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd. When the\ntimeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers\na cancellation request via xs_reset_transport(). When the timeout is\nhit on the client, another cancellation request happens via\nxs_tls_handshake_sync().\n\nAdd a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel\npath so duplicate cancels can be detected."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:N - An unauthenticated remote client can reach the bug through a network-facing SUNRPC/NFS server by sending an AUTH_TLS NULL probe. TCP receive processing reaches svcauth_tls_accept(), svc_tcp_handshake(), and ultimately duplicate handshake cancellation.\nAC:L - The attacker can create and abandon concurrent AUTH_TLS connections to keep requests pending and drive both timeout and transport-teardown cancellations. No memory-layout guess or uncontrollable race is required.\nPR:N - AUTH_TLS is processed before RPC credentials are authenticated, and the probe requires no established identity, account, or kernel capability.\nUI:N - The server processes the probe, timeout, and socket teardown automatically without victim user action.\nS:U - Exploitation affects the same host-kernel security authority processing the request and does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or comparable security boundary.\nC:H - The extra sock_put() can prematurely free a still-referenced socket, producing a reclaimable kernel use-after-free capable of exposing arbitrary kernel memory.\nI:H - Reclaiming the prematurely freed socket object can provide attacker-controlled data to subsequent kernel accesses, enabling arbitrary modification or control-flow hijacking.\nA:H - The socket use-after-free can cause a kernel oops or panic, while repeated unauthenticated triggers can also leak sockets and exhaust resources."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:11:25.376Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/011ae80c49d9bfa5b4336f8bd387cd25c7593663"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1641177e7fb48a0a5a06658d4aab51da6656659"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c330f1dee3cd92b57e19b9d21dc8ce5970b09be"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15564bd67e2975002f2a8e9defee33e321d3183f"
}
],
"title": "net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-68775",
"datePublished": "2026-01-13T15:28:52.069Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-24T10:30:51.035Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:11:25.376Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-68775",
"date": "2026-09-21",
"epss": "0.00535",
"percentile": "0.43907"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/handshake/request.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "011ae80c49d9bfa5b4336f8bd387cd25c7593663",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e1641177e7fb48a0a5a06658d4aab51da6656659",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3c330f1dee3cd92b57e19b9d21dc8ce5970b09be",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "15564bd67e2975002f2a8e9defee33e321d3183f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3b3009ea8abb713b022d94fba95ec270cf6e7eae",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/handshake/request.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.120",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.64",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket\n\nWhen a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the\nhandshake_net-\u003ehn_requests list, but it is still present in the\nhandshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed.\n\nIf a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request,\nthen remove_pending() will return false... and assuming\nHANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn\u0027t set in req-\u003ehr_flags, we\u0027ll continue\nprocessing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on\nthe sock and a refcount underflow occurs.\n\nThis can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if\nthe SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn\u0027t\nfollow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd. When the\ntimeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers\na cancellation request via xs_reset_transport(). When the timeout is\nhit on the client, another cancellation request happens via\nxs_tls_handshake_sync().\n\nAdd a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel\npath so duplicate cancels can be detected."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nnet/handshake: las cancelaciones duplicadas de handshake fugan el socket\n\nCuando una solicitud de handshake es cancelada, es eliminada de la lista handshake_net-\u0026gt;hn_requests, pero a\u00fan est\u00e1 presente en la handshake_rhashtbl hasta que es destruida.\n\nSi llega una segunda solicitud de cancelaci\u00f3n para la misma solicitud de handshake, entonces remove_pending() devolver\u00e1 falso... y asumiendo que HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED no est\u00e1 establecido en req-\u0026gt;hr_flags, continuaremos procesando a trav\u00e9s de la etiqueta out_true, donde ponemos otra referencia en el sock y ocurre un desbordamiento negativo del contador de referencias.\n\nEsto puede ocurrir por ejemplo si un handshake agota el tiempo de espera, particularmente si el cliente SUNRPC env\u00eda la sonda AUTH_TLS al servidor pero no la sigue con el ClientHello debido a un problema con tlshd. Cuando se alcanza el tiempo de espera en el servidor, el servidor enviar\u00e1 un FIN, lo que activa una solicitud de cancelaci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de xs_reset_transport(). Cuando se alcanza el tiempo de espera en el cliente, ocurre otra solicitud de cancelaci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de xs_tls_handshake_sync().\n\nA\u00f1adir un test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) en la ruta de cancelaci\u00f3n pendiente para que las cancelaciones duplicadas puedan ser detectadas."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-68775",
"lastModified": "2026-07-30T06:24:43.687",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-01-13T16:15:57.073",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/011ae80c49d9bfa5b4336f8bd387cd25c7593663"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15564bd67e2975002f2a8e9defee33e321d3183f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c330f1dee3cd92b57e19b9d21dc8ce5970b09be"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1641177e7fb48a0a5a06658d4aab51da6656659"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred"
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-21T20:46:50+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-68775",
"id": "CVE-2025-68775",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "184",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "90",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-68775.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…