CVE-2025-61736 (GCVE-0-2025-61736)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-17 12:36 – Updated: 2025-12-17 15:09- CWE-298 - Improper Validation of certificate expiration
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson Controls | iSTAReX, iSTAR Edge, iSTAR Ultra LT, iSTAR Ultra , iSTAR Ultra SE |
Affected:
iSTAR All versions prior to TLS 1.2
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61736",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-17T15:07:21.695642Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T15:09:46.607Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "iSTAReX, iSTAR Edge, iSTAR Ultra LT, iSTAR Ultra , iSTAR Ultra SE",
"vendor": "Johnson Controls",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "iSTAR All versions prior to TLS 1.2"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-12-04T12:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eSuccessful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the product failing to re-establish communication once the certificate expires.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the product failing to re-establish communication once the certificate expires."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-94",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-298",
"description": "CWE-298-Improper Validation of certificate expiration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T12:36:24.178Z",
"orgId": "7281d04a-a537-43df-bfb4-fa4110af9d01",
"shortName": "jci"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-338-04"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eJohnson Controls recommends the following mitigations:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHost-based certificates using TLS 1.2:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eQuickest solution\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eNo Upgrade required to specific C\u2022CURE or iSTAR software/firmware versions\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRequires downloading a new certificate to all iSTAR panels simultaneously, resulting in a brief system downtime\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eConvert encryption mode to TLS 1.3, per cluster:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eRequires firmware 6.9.0 or higher, and C\u2022CURE 9000 v2.90 SP3 or higher\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eEnables phased implementation by cluster, minimizing disruption\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eNote: TLS 1.3 is not supported on iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR Ultra LT panels\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eUpgrade legacy panels to new G2 hardware:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eRecommended for smaller systems due to time constraints\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eApplies primarily to iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR LT panels\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Johnson Controls recommends the following mitigations:\n\nHost-based certificates using TLS 1.2:\n\n * Quickest solution\n * No Upgrade required to specific C\u2022CURE or iSTAR software/firmware versions\n * Requires downloading a new certificate to all iSTAR panels simultaneously, resulting in a brief system downtime\n\n\nConvert encryption mode to TLS 1.3, per cluster:\n\n * Requires firmware 6.9.0 or higher, and C\u2022CURE 9000 v2.90 SP3 or higher\n * Enables phased implementation by cluster, minimizing disruption\n * Note: TLS 1.3 is not supported on iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR Ultra LT panels\n\n\nUpgrade legacy panels to new G2 hardware:\n\n * Recommended for smaller systems due to time constraints\n * Applies primarily to iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR LT panels"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "iSTAR- Improper Validation of Certificate Expiration",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7281d04a-a537-43df-bfb4-fa4110af9d01",
"assignerShortName": "jci",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61736",
"datePublished": "2025-12-17T12:36:24.178Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T15:51:17.096Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T15:09:46.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-61736",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00105",
"percentile": "0.01074"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "iSTAReX, iSTAR Edge, iSTAR Ultra LT, iSTAR Ultra , iSTAR Ultra SE",
"vendor": "Johnson Controls",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "iSTAR All versions prior to TLS 1.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "productsecurity@jci.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the product failing to re-establish communication once the certificate expires."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-61736",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:50:49.510",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "productsecurity@jci.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61736",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-17T15:07:21.695642Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-17T13:15:58.217",
"references": [
{
"source": "productsecurity@jci.com",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-338-04"
},
{
"source": "productsecurity@jci.com",
"url": "https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "productsecurity@jci.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-298"
}
],
"source": "productsecurity@jci.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-12-18T12:39:55+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-61736",
"id": "CVE-2025-61736",
"initial_release_date": "2025-12-04T12:30:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "iSTAR- Improper Validation of Certificate Expiration",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-61736.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61736",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-17T15:07:21.695642Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T15:07:40.641Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "iSTAReX, iSTAR Edge, iSTAR Ultra LT, iSTAR Ultra , iSTAR Ultra SE",
"vendor": "Johnson Controls",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "iSTAR All versions prior to TLS 1.2"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-12-04T12:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eSuccessful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the product failing to re-establish communication once the certificate expires.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the product failing to re-establish communication once the certificate expires."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-94",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-298",
"description": "CWE-298-Improper Validation of certificate expiration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T12:36:24.178Z",
"orgId": "7281d04a-a537-43df-bfb4-fa4110af9d01",
"shortName": "jci"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-338-04"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eJohnson Controls recommends the following mitigations:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHost-based certificates using TLS 1.2:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eQuickest solution\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eNo Upgrade required to specific C\u2022CURE or iSTAR software/firmware versions\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eRequires downloading a new certificate to all iSTAR panels simultaneously, resulting in a brief system downtime\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eConvert encryption mode to TLS 1.3, per cluster:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eRequires firmware 6.9.0 or higher, and C\u2022CURE 9000 v2.90 SP3 or higher\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eEnables phased implementation by cluster, minimizing disruption\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eNote: TLS 1.3 is not supported on iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR Ultra LT panels\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eUpgrade legacy panels to new G2 hardware:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eRecommended for smaller systems due to time constraints\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eApplies primarily to iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR LT panels\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Johnson Controls recommends the following mitigations:\n\nHost-based certificates using TLS 1.2:\n\n * Quickest solution\n * No Upgrade required to specific C\u2022CURE or iSTAR software/firmware versions\n * Requires downloading a new certificate to all iSTAR panels simultaneously, resulting in a brief system downtime\n\n\nConvert encryption mode to TLS 1.3, per cluster:\n\n * Requires firmware 6.9.0 or higher, and C\u2022CURE 9000 v2.90 SP3 or higher\n * Enables phased implementation by cluster, minimizing disruption\n * Note: TLS 1.3 is not supported on iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR Ultra LT panels\n\n\nUpgrade legacy panels to new G2 hardware:\n\n * Recommended for smaller systems due to time constraints\n * Applies primarily to iSTAR eX, iSTAR Edge, and iSTAR LT panels"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "iSTAR- Improper Validation of Certificate Expiration",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7281d04a-a537-43df-bfb4-fa4110af9d01",
"assignerShortName": "jci",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61736",
"datePublished": "2025-12-17T12:36:24.178Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T15:51:17.096Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T15:09:46.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.