CVE-2025-5287 (GCVE-0-2025-5287)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-28 08:22 – Updated: 2026-04-08 17:15- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| erumfaham | Likes and Dislikes Plugin |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.0.0
(semver)
|
guessed |
Shadowserver
Known Exploited Vulnerability - GCVE BCP-07 Compliant
Exploited: Yes
Characteristics
Timestamps
Scope
Evidence
Type: Honeypot
Signal: In The Wild Attempts
Confidence: 70%
Source: shadowserver
Details
| 1D | 1 |
|---|---|
| Iot | no |
| Feed | Shadowserver Foundation honeypot/exploited-vulnerabilities |
| Type | http-scan |
| Class | cms |
| 7D Avg | 0 |
| Vendor | Likes and Dislikes |
| 30D Avg | 0 |
| 90D Avg | 0 |
| Product | Likes and Dislikes WordPress Plugin |
| Cisa Kev | no |
| Connections | 2 |
| Observation Date | 2026-11-04 |
| Vulnerability Class | CVSS |
| Vulnerability Score | 7.5 |
| Vulnerability Severity | High |
References
Previdian
Known Exploited Vulnerability - GCVE BCP-07 Compliant
Exploited: Yes
Timestamps
Scope
Evidence
Type: Public Report
Signal: Successful Exploitation
Confidence: 70%
Source: kevintel
Details
| Feed | KEVIntel (kevintel.com) |
|---|---|
| Title | Likes and Dislikes Plugin <= 1.0.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection |
| Vendor | erumfaham |
| Product | Likes and Dislikes Plugin |
| Added Date | 2026-02-15T00:00:00.000Z |
| Cvss Score | 7.5 |
| Epss Score | None |
| Cvss Severity | HIGH |
| Epss Percentile | None |
| Used In Malware | unknown |
| Ahead Of Cisa Kev | None |
| Not Yet In Cisa Kev | True |
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-5287",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-28T13:40:13.991441Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-28T13:41:08.356Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Likes and Dislikes Plugin",
"vendor": "erumfaham",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Khaled Alenazi"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Likes and Dislikes Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the \u0027post\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:15:06.586Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ad19205d-d355-45d8-be5b-f8005459a8c7?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/inprosysmedia-likes-dislikes-post/trunk/inprosysmedia-likes-dislikes-post.php#L76"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-05-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Likes and Dislikes Plugin \u003c= 1.0.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-5287",
"datePublished": "2025-05-28T08:22:17.666Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-27T19:27:21.875Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:15:06.586Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-5287",
"date": "2026-11-14",
"epss": "0.02381",
"percentile": "0.84172"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Likes and Dislikes Plugin",
"vendor": "erumfaham",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Likes and Dislikes Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the \u0027post\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El complemento Likes and Dislikes Plugin para WordPress es vulnerable a la inyecci\u00f3n SQL mediante el par\u00e1metro \"post\" en todas las versiones hasta la 1.0.0 incluida, debido a un escape insuficiente del par\u00e1metro proporcionado por el usuario y a la falta de preparaci\u00f3n de la consulta SQL existente. Esto permite a atacantes no autenticados a\u00f1adir consultas SQL adicionales a las consultas existentes, las cuales pueden utilizarse para extraer informaci\u00f3n confidencial de la base de datos."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-5287",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:47:37.180",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-5287",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-28T13:40:13.991441Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-05-28T09:15:21.480",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/inprosysmedia-likes-dislikes-post/trunk/inprosysmedia-likes-dislikes-post.php#L76"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ad19205d-d355-45d8-be5b-f8005459a8c7?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-89"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T08:33:03+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-5287",
"id": "CVE-2025-5287",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Likes and Dislikes Plugin \u003c= 1.0.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-5287.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-5287",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-28T13:40:13.991441Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-28T13:40:57.824Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Likes and Dislikes Plugin",
"vendor": "erumfaham",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Khaled Alenazi"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Likes and Dislikes Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the \u0027post\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:15:06.586Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ad19205d-d355-45d8-be5b-f8005459a8c7?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/inprosysmedia-likes-dislikes-post/trunk/inprosysmedia-likes-dislikes-post.php#L76"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-05-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Likes and Dislikes Plugin \u003c= 1.0.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-5287",
"datePublished": "2025-05-28T08:22:17.666Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-27T19:27:21.875Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:15:06.586Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.