CVE-2025-41256 (GCVE-0-2025-41256)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-25 09:16 – Updated: 2025-06-25 13:34
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Cyberduck and Mountain Duck - Weak Hash Algorithm for Certificate Fingerprint
Summary
Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak.
This issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5.
Severity
7.4 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-06-25 13:34 UTC
CWE
- CWE-328 - Use of Weak Hash
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/pu… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iterate GmbH | Cyberduck |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 9.1.6
(semver)
|
guessed | |
| iterate GmbH | Mountain Duck |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 4.17.5
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-41256",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-25T13:34:04.627890Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T13:34:07.242Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250325-02_Cyberduck_Mountain_Duck_Weak_Hash"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/advisories/GHSA-688c-vjrc-84rv"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cyberduck",
"repo": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck",
"vendor": "iterate GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Mountain Duck",
"vendor": "iterate GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.17.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thomas Kostal"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andreas Boll"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eCyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-328",
"description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T09:16:58.586Z",
"orgId": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"shortName": "sba-research"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250325-02_Cyberduck_Mountain_Duck_Weak_Hash"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/advisories/GHSA-688c-vjrc-84rv"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cyberduck and Mountain Duck - Weak Hash Algorithm for Certificate Fingerprint",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"assignerShortName": "sba-research",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-41256",
"datePublished": "2025-06-25T09:16:58.586Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T09:37:50.631Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T13:34:07.242Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-41256",
"date": "2026-09-29",
"epss": "0.0013",
"percentile": "0.02182"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cyberduck",
"repo": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck",
"vendor": "iterate GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Mountain Duck",
"vendor": "iterate GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.17.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Cyberduck y Mountain Duck gestionan incorrectamente la fijaci\u00f3n de certificados TLS para certificados no confiables (p. ej., autofirmados), ya que la huella digital del certificado se almacena como SHA-1, aunque SHA-1 se considera d\u00e9bil. Este problema afecta a Cyberduck: hasta la versi\u00f3n 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: hasta la versi\u00f3n 4.17.5."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-41256",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:22:41.027",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-41256",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-25T13:34:04.627890Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-06-25T10:15:22.610",
"references": [
{
"source": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"url": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/advisories/GHSA-688c-vjrc-84rv"
},
{
"source": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250325-02_Cyberduck_Mountain_Duck_Weak_Hash"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/advisories/GHSA-688c-vjrc-84rv"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250325-02_Cyberduck_Mountain_Duck_Weak_Hash"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-328"
}
],
"source": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-06-27T09:21:26+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-41256",
"id": "CVE-2025-41256",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Cyberduck and Mountain Duck - Weak Hash Algorithm for Certificate Fingerprint",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-41256.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-41256",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-25T13:34:04.627890Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T13:34:00.449Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250325-02_Cyberduck_Mountain_Duck_Weak_Hash"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/advisories/GHSA-688c-vjrc-84rv"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cyberduck",
"repo": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck",
"vendor": "iterate GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Mountain Duck",
"vendor": "iterate GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.17.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thomas Kostal"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andreas Boll"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eCyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-328",
"description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T09:16:58.586Z",
"orgId": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"shortName": "sba-research"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250325-02_Cyberduck_Mountain_Duck_Weak_Hash"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/iterate-ch/cyberduck/security/advisories/GHSA-688c-vjrc-84rv"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cyberduck and Mountain Duck - Weak Hash Algorithm for Certificate Fingerprint",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e3a9e0f-5156-4bf8-b8a3-cc311bfc0f4a",
"assignerShortName": "sba-research",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-41256",
"datePublished": "2025-06-25T09:16:58.586Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T09:37:50.631Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T13:34:07.242Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…