Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2025-39971 (GCVE-0-2025-39971)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-15 07:55 – Updated: 2026-08-05 12:06| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648
(git)
Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2 (git) Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < 1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1 (git) Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < 8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde (git) Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < 2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a (git) Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b (git) Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < 5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65 (git) Affected: c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5 , < f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
4.17
Unaffected: 0 , < 4.17 (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.300 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.245 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.194 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.155 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.109 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.50 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.16.10 , ≤ 6.16.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.17 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T15:52:18.829458Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T15:52:31.898Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.17",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.245",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.194",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.155",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.109",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.50",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.300",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.245",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.194",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.155",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.109",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.50",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.16.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg\n\nEnsure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over\nvf-\u003ech[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg()."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The malicious input arrives as a `VIRTCHNL_OP_CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES` message on the SR-IOV VF\u2192PF admin-queue mailbox, a PCIe transport, not a network protocol. The attacker needs local control of an assigned VF (guest VM or VF-owning container), so this is local reachability rather than network or adjacent.\nAC:L - The attacker fully controls every input \u2014 `num_tc` and per-TC `count` via ENABLE_CHANNELS, then `num_queue_pairs` and the qpair array via CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES \u2014 so shrinking `num_tc` to leave stale `ch[]` entries and then walking `idx` into them is deterministic on the first attempt with no memory grooming or race. The only precondition, spoofchk disabled, is inherent to any ADq-enabled SR-IOV deployment and is a standard runtime configuration.\nPR:L - The attacker only needs to drive the VF\u0027s admin queue \u2014 kernel/root inside the assigned guest, or possession of the VFIO device \u2014 which is a low-privileged position relative to the host PF driver under attack. No privileges of any kind on the host are required.\nUI:N - The malicious VF sends the virtchnl message sequence entirely on its own initiative. No host administrator or other user action is needed at any stage.\nS:C - The attacking VF sits in a guest VM (or VF-assigned container) while the stale-index read and the resulting hardware queue-context programming occur in the host PF driver\u0027s security authority. The corrupted resources \u2014 HMC LAN Tx/Rx contexts and QTX_CTL bindings of VSIs belonging to the PF or to other VFs \u2014 are outside the attacker\u0027s scope, crossing the guest/host and inter-tenant SR-IOV boundary.\nC:H - Using a stale `ch[idx].vsi_id`, the VF resolves and reprograms the Rx queue context of a VSI it does not own, setting `rx_ctx.base` from its own `dma_ring_addr` so another VSI\u0027s received traffic is DMA\u0027d into attacker-designated memory \u2014 interception of host and cross-guest traffic. On pre-5.2 kernels the same defect additionally reads past the end of `vf-\u003ech[]` into adjacent `struct i40e_vf` state.\nI:H - `i40e_config_vsi_rx_queue()` performs no ownership check and `i40e_config_vsi_tx_queue()` validates only the VF-supplied `info-\u003evsi_id`, so the stale ID lets the VF clear and rewrite the LAN HMC Tx/Rx contexts of a foreign VSI\u0027s queues and issue a `QTX_CTL` write rebinding that PF queue to itself. This is attacker-controlled modification of host- and peer-owned hardware state.\nA:H - Clearing and rewriting queue contexts belonging to the PF\u0027s main VSI or another guest\u0027s VSI stalls or wedges those queues, and out-of-range `pf_queue_id` values (`I40E_QUEUE_END_OF_LIST`) drive HMC operations that trigger adapter error paths, PF/VF reset storms and loss of host networking. The VF can repeat the sequence at will, and a downed host PF takes every guest on the adapter with it."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:06:40.599Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115"
}
],
"title": "i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-39971",
"datePublished": "2025-10-15T07:55:54.270Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T07:20:57.149Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:06:40.599Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-39971",
"date": "2026-09-21",
"epss": "0.00154",
"percentile": "0.04976"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-10-16T01:01:48.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2025-39971",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2025-39971",
"initial_release_date": "2025-10-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "2",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2025/msrc_cve-2025-39971.json",
"version": "1"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.17",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.245",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.194",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.155",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.109",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.50",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg\n\nEnsure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over\nvf-\u003ech[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"lastModified": "2026-07-30T06:24:02.880",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.0,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T15:52:18.829458Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-10-15T08:15:34.757",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred"
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-07-30T08:57:08+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-39971",
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"initial_release_date": "2025-10-15T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "2416",
"product_status:known_affected": "22",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "14",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-39971.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T15:52:18.829458Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T15:52:24.239Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.17",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.245",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.194",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.155",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.109",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.50",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.300",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.245",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.194",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.155",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.109",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.50",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.16.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.17",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg\n\nEnsure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over\nvf-\u003ech[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg()."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The malicious input arrives as a `VIRTCHNL_OP_CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES` message on the SR-IOV VF\u2192PF admin-queue mailbox, a PCIe transport, not a network protocol. The attacker needs local control of an assigned VF (guest VM or VF-owning container), so this is local reachability rather than network or adjacent.\nAC:L - The attacker fully controls every input \u2014 `num_tc` and per-TC `count` via ENABLE_CHANNELS, then `num_queue_pairs` and the qpair array via CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES \u2014 so shrinking `num_tc` to leave stale `ch[]` entries and then walking `idx` into them is deterministic on the first attempt with no memory grooming or race. The only precondition, spoofchk disabled, is inherent to any ADq-enabled SR-IOV deployment and is a standard runtime configuration.\nPR:L - The attacker only needs to drive the VF\u0027s admin queue \u2014 kernel/root inside the assigned guest, or possession of the VFIO device \u2014 which is a low-privileged position relative to the host PF driver under attack. No privileges of any kind on the host are required.\nUI:N - The malicious VF sends the virtchnl message sequence entirely on its own initiative. No host administrator or other user action is needed at any stage.\nS:C - The attacking VF sits in a guest VM (or VF-assigned container) while the stale-index read and the resulting hardware queue-context programming occur in the host PF driver\u0027s security authority. The corrupted resources \u2014 HMC LAN Tx/Rx contexts and QTX_CTL bindings of VSIs belonging to the PF or to other VFs \u2014 are outside the attacker\u0027s scope, crossing the guest/host and inter-tenant SR-IOV boundary.\nC:H - Using a stale `ch[idx].vsi_id`, the VF resolves and reprograms the Rx queue context of a VSI it does not own, setting `rx_ctx.base` from its own `dma_ring_addr` so another VSI\u0027s received traffic is DMA\u0027d into attacker-designated memory \u2014 interception of host and cross-guest traffic. On pre-5.2 kernels the same defect additionally reads past the end of `vf-\u003ech[]` into adjacent `struct i40e_vf` state.\nI:H - `i40e_config_vsi_rx_queue()` performs no ownership check and `i40e_config_vsi_tx_queue()` validates only the VF-supplied `info-\u003evsi_id`, so the stale ID lets the VF clear and rewrite the LAN HMC Tx/Rx contexts of a foreign VSI\u0027s queues and issue a `QTX_CTL` write rebinding that PF queue to itself. This is attacker-controlled modification of host- and peer-owned hardware state.\nA:H - Clearing and rewriting queue contexts belonging to the PF\u0027s main VSI or another guest\u0027s VSI stalls or wedges those queues, and out-of-range `pf_queue_id` values (`I40E_QUEUE_END_OF_LIST`) drive HMC operations that trigger adapter error paths, PF/VF reset storms and loss of host networking. The VF can repeat the sequence at will, and a downed host PF takes every guest on the adapter with it."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:06:40.599Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115"
}
],
"title": "i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-39971",
"datePublished": "2025-10-15T07:55:54.270Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T07:20:57.149Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:06:40.599Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-05-07 - Updated: 2026-05-07
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 25.10",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-05-07T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-05-07T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-05-07T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8243-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8243-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8226-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8226-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8179-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8179-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8244-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8244-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8226-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8226-2"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-05-15 - Updated: 2026-05-15
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8261-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8261-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8266-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8266-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8180-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8254-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8254-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8265-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8265-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8260-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8260-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8258-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8258-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8267-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8267-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8200-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8200-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8255-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8255-2"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2025-39971
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-10-15 08:15 - Updated: 2026-07-30 06:24| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115",
"status": "affected",
"version": "c27eac48160de72dee33d42b5a33cc7b8a2eb1f5",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.17",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.245",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.194",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.155",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.109",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.50",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.16.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.17",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg\n\nEnsure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over\nvf-\u003ech[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg()."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"lastModified": "2026-07-30T06:24:02.880",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.0,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-39971",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T15:52:18.829458Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-10-15T08:15:34.757",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred"
}
GHSA-H9CJ-J3JC-97WC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-15 09:30 – Updated: 2026-07-30 06:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg
Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-39971"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-15T08:15:34Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg\n\nEnsure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over\nvf-\u003ech[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().",
"id": "GHSA-h9cj-j3jc-97wc",
"modified": "2026-07-30T06:32:11Z",
"published": "2025-10-15T09:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fa0aadade34481c567cdf4a897c0d4e4d548bd1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2cc26dac0518d2fa9b67ec813ee60e183480f98a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c1f96123113e0bdc6d8dc2b0830184c93da9f65"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b9c7719b0987b1c6c5fc910599f3618a558dbde"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6ff2af78343eceb0f77ab1a2fe802183bc21648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfcc1dff429d4b99ba03e40ddacc68ea4be2b32b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ad24c5abe1eaef69158bac1405a74b3c365115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5f91d164af22e7147130ef8bebbdb28d8ecc6e2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2025-39971
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2025-10-02 00:00 - Updated: 2025-10-16 01:01OESA-2025-2532 (CVE-2025-21801)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-24 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend/resume path
Fix the suspend/resume path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where required. Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be performed under the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo operations.
Without this fix, the following warning is triggered: [ 39.032969] ============================= [ 39.032983] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 39.033019] ----------------------------- [ 39.033033] drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:2004 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! ... [ 39.033597] stack backtrace: [ 39.033613] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-next-20250116-arm64-renesas-00002-g35245dfdc62c #7 [ 39.033623] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on r9a08g045s33 (DT) [ 39.033628] Call trace: [ 39.033633] show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) [ 39.033652] dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0xc4 [ 39.033664] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 39.033671] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x16c/0x22c [ 39.033682] phy_detach+0x160/0x190 [ 39.033694] phy_disconnect+0x40/0x54 [ 39.033703] ravb_close+0x6c/0x1cc [ 39.033714] ravb_suspend+0x48/0x120 [ 39.033721] dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x14c [ 39.033731] device_suspend+0x11c/0x4dc [ 39.033740] dpm_suspend+0xdc/0x214 [ 39.033748] dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x60 [ 39.033758] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x124/0x574 [ 39.033769] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x274 [ 39.033778] state_store+0x88/0x124 [ 39.033788] kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24 [ 39.033798] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x6c [ 39.033808] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 [ 39.033817] vfs_write+0x27c/0x378 [ 39.033825] ksys_write+0x64/0xf4 [ 39.033833] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 39.033841] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104 [ 39.033852] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4 [ 39.033862] do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20 [ 39.033870] el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0 [ 39.033880] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4 [ 39.033888] el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158 [ 39.041274] ravb 11c30000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down(CVE-2025-21801)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: btrtl: Prevent potential NULL dereference
The btrtl_initialize() function checks that rtl_load_file() either had an error or it loaded a zero length file. However, if it loaded a zero length file then the error code is not set correctly. It results in an error pointer vs NULL bug, followed by a NULL pointer dereference. This was detected by Smatch:
drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'(CVE-2025-37792)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: ets: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report 1, there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of ets, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before doing the addition to cater for the reentrant case.
1 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37914)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: adjust subpage bit start based on sectorsize
When running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started seeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because we were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects all metadata writes.
When writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty range. If the range isn't dirty we do
bit_start++;
to move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the number of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k pagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4 bits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per page.
To make this easier this is how everything looks
[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address [0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset [ 64k page ] folio [ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers [ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap
Now we use all of our addressing based on fs_info->sectorsize_bits, so as you can see the above our 16k eb->start turns into radix entry 4.
When we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start += sectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the next eb is 4, to correspond to eb->start 16k.
However if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now put us offset from our radix tree entries.
In our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is not dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop around and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that start using the following equation
start = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info->sectorsize;
so in the case above, eb->start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start as
0 + 1 * fs_info->sectorsize = 4096
4096 >> 12 = 1
Now we're looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won't find an eb. What's worse is now we're using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start += sectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into the same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the radix tree, and now we're skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.
The best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes, but that's a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix it simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.(CVE-2025-37931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev
The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.
In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.
This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive.
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);(CVE-2025-38313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to bail out in get_new_segment()
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 579 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2832 new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc pc : new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc Call trace: new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xa54/0xe28 do_write_page+0x6c/0x194 f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x38/0x78 __write_node_page+0x248/0x6d4 f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x524/0x72c f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x4bc/0x9b0 __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0x80/0x244 issue_checkpoint_thread+0x8c/0xec kthread+0x114/0x1bc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
get_new_segment() detects inconsistent status in between free_segmap and free_secmap, let's record such error into super block, and bail out get_new_segment() instead of continue using the segment.(CVE-2025-38333)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850
GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST is wrongly defined for WCN7850, causing kernel crash on some specific platforms.
Since this register is divergent for WCN7850 and QCN9274, move it to register table to allow different definitions. Then correct the register address for WCN7850 to fix this issue.
Note IPQ5332 is not affected as it is not PCIe based device.
Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3(CVE-2025-38414)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: cancle set bad inode after removing name fails
The reproducer uses a file0 on a ntfs3 file system with a corrupted i_link. When renaming, the file0's inode is marked as a bad inode because the file name cannot be deleted.
The underlying bug is that make_bad_inode() is called on a live inode. In some cases it's "icache lookup finds a normal inode, d_splice_alias() is called to attach it to dentry, while another thread decides to call make_bad_inode() on it - that would evict it from icache, but we'd already found it there earlier". In some it's outright "we have an inode attached to dentry - that's how we got it in the first place; let's call make_bad_inode() on it just for shits and giggles".(CVE-2025-38615)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libiscsi: Initialize iscsi_conn->dd_data only if memory is allocated
In case of an ib_fast_reg_mr allocation failure during iSER setup, the machine hits a panic because iscsi_conn->dd_data is initialized unconditionally, even when no memory is allocated (dd_size == 0). This leads invalid pointer dereference during connection teardown.
Fix by setting iscsi_conn->dd_data only if memory is actually allocated.
Panic trace:
iser: iser_create_fastreg_desc: Failed to allocate ib_fast_reg_mr err=-12 iser: iser_alloc_rx_descriptors: failed allocating rx descriptors / data buffers BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8 RIP: 0010:swake_up_locked.part.5+0xa/0x40 Call Trace: complete+0x31/0x40 iscsi_iser_conn_stop+0x88/0xb0 [ib_iser] iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi] iscsi_if_stop_conn+0x14a/0x150 [scsi_transport_iscsi] iscsi_if_rx+0x1135/0x1834 [scsi_transport_iscsi] ? netlink_lookup+0x12f/0x1b0 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x2c/0x200 netlink_unicast+0x1ab/0x280 netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0 ? _copy_from_user+0x29/0x60 sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70(CVE-2025-38700)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: do not BUG when INLINE_DATA_FL lacks system.data xattr
A syzbot fuzzed image triggered a BUG_ON in ext4_update_inline_data() when an inode had the INLINE_DATA_FL flag set but was missing the system.data extended attribute.
Since this can happen due to a maiciouly fuzzed file system, we shouldn't BUG, but rather, report it as a corrupted file system.
Add similar replacements of BUG_ON with EXT4_ERROR_INODE() ii ext4_create_inline_data() and ext4_inline_data_truncate().(CVE-2025-38701)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
loop: Avoid updating block size under exclusive owner
Syzbot came up with a reproducer where a loop device block size is changed underneath a mounted filesystem. This causes a mismatch between the block device block size and the block size stored in the superblock causing confusion in various places such as fs/buffer.c. The particular issue triggered by syzbot was a warning in __getblk_slow() due to requested buffer size not matching block device block size.
Fix the problem by getting exclusive hold of the loop device to change its block size. This fails if somebody (such as filesystem) has already an exclusive ownership of the block device and thus prevents modifying the loop device under some exclusive owner which doesn't expect it.(CVE-2025-38709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ>
Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer
wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller
put_bh
--> trigger stack-out-of-bounds
In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.
If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().(CVE-2025-39691)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in the traversal are valid.(CVE-2025-39787)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits()
In blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t->chunk_sectors value is a multiple of the t->physical_block_size value.
However, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow the unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be based on sectors.(CVE-2025-39795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pcmcia: Add error handling for add_interval() in do_validate_mem()
In the do_validate_mem(), the call to add_interval() does not handle errors. If kmalloc() fails in add_interval(), it could result in a null pointer being inserted into the linked list, leading to illegal memory access when sub_interval() is called next.
This patch adds an error handling for the add_interval(). If add_interval() returns an error, the function will return early with the error code.(CVE-2025-39920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees
When we don't have a clock specified in the device tree, we have no way to ensure the BAM is on. This is often the case for remotely-controlled or remotely-powered BAM instances. In this case, we need to read num-channels from the DT to have all the necessary information to complete probing.
However, at the moment invalid device trees without clock and without num-channels still continue probing, because the error handling is missing return statements. The driver will then later try to read the number of channels from the registers. This is unsafe, because it relies on boot firmware and lucky timing to succeed. Unfortunately, the lack of proper error handling here has been abused for several Qualcomm SoCs upstream, causing early boot crashes in several situations [1, 2].
Avoid these early crashes by erroring out when any of the required DT properties are missing. Note that this will break some of the existing DTs upstream (mainly BAM instances related to the crypto engine). However, clearly these DTs have never been tested properly, since the error in the kernel log was just ignored. It's safer to disable the crypto engine for these broken DTBs.
In the Linux kernel i40e driver, there is a security vulnerability: the driver lacks boundary checks for the maximum number of virtual function (VF) filters. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to request filter counts beyond the boundaries, leading to potential security issues.(CVE-2025-39968)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mce: use is_copy_from_user() to determine copy-from-user context
Patch series "mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling", v4.
1. What am I trying to do:
This patchset resolves two critical regressions related to memory failure handling that have appeared in the upstream kernel since version 5.17, as compared to 5.10 LTS.
- copyin case: poison found in user page while kernel copying from user space
- instr case: poison found while instruction fetching in user space
2. What is the expected outcome and why
- For copyin case:
Kernel can recover from poison found where kernel is doing get_user() or copy_from_user() if those places get an error return and the kernel return -EFAULT to the process instead of crashing. More specifily, MCE handler checks the fixup handler type to decide whether an in kernel #MC can be recovered. When EX_TYPE_UACCESS is found, the PC jumps to recovery code specified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() and return a -EFAULT to user space.
- For instr case:
If a poison found while instruction fetching in user space, full recovery is possible. User process takes #PF, Linux allocates a new page and fills by reading from storage.
3. What actually happens and why
- For copyin case: kernel panic since v5.17
Commit 4c132d1d844a ("x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage") introduced a new extable fixup type, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, and later patches updated the extable fixup type for copy-from-user operations, changing it from EX_TYPE_UACCESS to EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG. It breaks previous EX_TYPE_UACCESS handling when posion found in get_user() or copy_from_user().
- For instr case: user process is killed by a SIGBUS signal due to #CMCI and #MCE race
When an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the CMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA signature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when the data is about to be consumed.
Background: why UNcorrected errors tied to CMCI in Intel platform 1
Prior to Icelake memory controllers reported patrol scrub events that detected a previously unseen uncorrected error in memory by signaling a broadcast machine check with an SRAO (Software Recoverable Action Optional) signature in the machine check bank. This was overkill because it's not an urgent problem that no core is on the verge of consuming that bad data. It's also found that multi SRAO UCE may cause nested MCE interrupts and finally become an IERR.
Hence, Intel downgrades the machine check bank signature of patrol scrub from SRAO to UCNA (Uncorrected, No Action required), and signal changed to
CMCI. Just to add to the confusion, Linux does take an action (in
uc_decode_notifier()) to try to offline the page despite the UCNA signature name.
Background: why #CMCI and #MCE race when poison is consuming in
Intel platform [1]
Having decided that CMCI/UCNA is the best action for patrol scrub errors, the memory controller uses it for reads too. But the memory controller is executing asynchronously from the core, and can't tell the difference between a "real" read and a speculative read. So it will do CMCI/UCNA if an error is found in any read.
Thus:
1) Core is clever and thinks address A is needed soon, issues a speculative read.
2) Core finds it is going to use address A soon after sending the read request
3) The CMCI from the memory controller is in a race with MCE from the core that will soon try to retire the load from address A.
Quite often (because speculation has got better) the CMCI from the memory controller is delivered before the core is committed to the instruction reading address A, so the interrupt is taken, and Linux offlines the page (marking it as poison).
Why user process is killed for instr case
Commit 046545a661af ("mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported "not ---truncated---(CVE-2025-39989)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-extra-modules-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-extra-modules-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP2",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-113.0.0.119.oe2403sp2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend/resume path\n\nFix the suspend/resume path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where\nrequired. Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be\nperformed under the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo\noperations.\n\nWithout this fix, the following warning is triggered:\n[ 39.032969] =============================\n[ 39.032983] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n[ 39.033019] -----------------------------\n[ 39.033033] drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:2004 suspicious\nrcu_dereference_protected() usage!\n...\n[ 39.033597] stack backtrace:\n[ 39.033613] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: python3 Not tainted\n6.13.0-rc7-next-20250116-arm64-renesas-00002-g35245dfdc62c #7\n[ 39.033623] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on\nr9a08g045s33 (DT)\n[ 39.033628] Call trace:\n[ 39.033633] show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C)\n[ 39.033652] dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0xc4\n[ 39.033664] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c\n[ 39.033671] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x16c/0x22c\n[ 39.033682] phy_detach+0x160/0x190\n[ 39.033694] phy_disconnect+0x40/0x54\n[ 39.033703] ravb_close+0x6c/0x1cc\n[ 39.033714] ravb_suspend+0x48/0x120\n[ 39.033721] dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x14c\n[ 39.033731] device_suspend+0x11c/0x4dc\n[ 39.033740] dpm_suspend+0xdc/0x214\n[ 39.033748] dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x60\n[ 39.033758] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x124/0x574\n[ 39.033769] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x274\n[ 39.033778] state_store+0x88/0x124\n[ 39.033788] kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24\n[ 39.033798] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x6c\n[ 39.033808] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8\n[ 39.033817] vfs_write+0x27c/0x378\n[ 39.033825] ksys_write+0x64/0xf4\n[ 39.033833] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20\n[ 39.033841] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104\n[ 39.033852] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4\n[ 39.033862] do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20\n[ 39.033870] el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0\n[ 39.033880] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4\n[ 39.033888] el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158\n[ 39.041274] ravb 11c30000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down(CVE-2025-21801)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: btrtl: Prevent potential NULL dereference\n\nThe btrtl_initialize() function checks that rtl_load_file() either\nhad an error or it loaded a zero length file. However, if it loaded\na zero length file then the error code is not set correctly. It\nresults in an error pointer vs NULL bug, followed by a NULL pointer\ndereference. This was detected by Smatch:\n\ndrivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize() warn: passing zero to \u0026apos;ERR_PTR\u0026apos;(CVE-2025-37792)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: ets: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of ets, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether\nthe class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before\ndoing the addition to cater for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37914)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: adjust subpage bit start based on sectorsize\n\nWhen running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started\nseeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because\nwe were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects\nall metadata writes.\n\nWhen writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty\nrange. If the range isn\u0026apos;t dirty we do\n\n\tbit_start++;\n\nto move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the\nnumber of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k\npagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4\nbits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per\npage.\n\nTo make this easier this is how everything looks\n\n[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address\n[0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset\n[ 64k page ] folio\n[ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers\n[ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap\n\nNow we use all of our addressing based on fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize_bits, so\nas you can see the above our 16k eb-\u0026gt;start turns into radix entry 4.\n\nWhen we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start +=\nsectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the\nnext eb is 4, to correspond to eb-\u0026gt;start 16k.\n\nHowever if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now\nput us offset from our radix tree entries.\n\nIn our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is\nnot dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop\naround and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that\nstart using the following equation\n\n\tstart = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize;\n\nso in the case above, eb-\u0026gt;start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start\nas\n\n\t0 + 1 * fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize = 4096\n\t4096 \u0026gt;\u0026gt; 12 = 1\n\nNow we\u0026apos;re looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won\u0026apos;t find an eb.\nWhat\u0026apos;s worse is now we\u0026apos;re using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start +=\nsectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into\nthe same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the\nradix tree, and now we\u0026apos;re skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.\n\nThe best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes,\nbut that\u0026apos;s a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix\nit simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.(CVE-2025-37931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev\n\nThe blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but,\nin the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.\n\nIn case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the\nmc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this\ncircumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.\n\nThis commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a\nfalse-positive.\n\nWARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required\n+ if (mc_bus)\n+ kfree(mc_bus);(CVE-2025-38313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to bail out in get_new_segment()\n\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 579 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2832 new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\npc : new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\nCall trace:\n new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\n f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xa54/0xe28\n do_write_page+0x6c/0x194\n f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x38/0x78\n __write_node_page+0x248/0x6d4\n f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x524/0x72c\n f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x4bc/0x9b0\n __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0x80/0x244\n issue_checkpoint_thread+0x8c/0xec\n kthread+0x114/0x1bc\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n\nget_new_segment() detects inconsistent status in between free_segmap\nand free_secmap, let\u0026apos;s record such error into super block, and bail\nout get_new_segment() instead of continue using the segment.(CVE-2025-38333)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850\n\nGCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST is wrongly defined for WCN7850, causing kernel crash\non some specific platforms.\n\nSince this register is divergent for WCN7850 and QCN9274, move it to\nregister table to allow different definitions. Then correct the register\naddress for WCN7850 to fix this issue.\n\nNote IPQ5332 is not affected as it is not PCIe based device.\n\nTested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3(CVE-2025-38414)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/ntfs3: cancle set bad inode after removing name fails\n\nThe reproducer uses a file0 on a ntfs3 file system with a corrupted i_link.\nWhen renaming, the file0\u0026apos;s inode is marked as a bad inode because the file\nname cannot be deleted.\n\nThe underlying bug is that make_bad_inode() is called on a live inode.\nIn some cases it\u0026apos;s \u0026quot;icache lookup finds a normal inode, d_splice_alias()\nis called to attach it to dentry, while another thread decides to call\nmake_bad_inode() on it - that would evict it from icache, but we\u0026apos;d already\nfound it there earlier\u0026quot;.\nIn some it\u0026apos;s outright \u0026quot;we have an inode attached to dentry - that\u0026apos;s how we\ngot it in the first place; let\u0026apos;s call make_bad_inode() on it just for shits\nand giggles\u0026quot;.(CVE-2025-38615)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: libiscsi: Initialize iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data only if memory is allocated\n\nIn case of an ib_fast_reg_mr allocation failure during iSER setup, the\nmachine hits a panic because iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data is initialized\nunconditionally, even when no memory is allocated (dd_size == 0). This\nleads invalid pointer dereference during connection teardown.\n\nFix by setting iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data only if memory is actually allocated.\n\nPanic trace:\n------------\n iser: iser_create_fastreg_desc: Failed to allocate ib_fast_reg_mr err=-12\n iser: iser_alloc_rx_descriptors: failed allocating rx descriptors / data buffers\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8\n RIP: 0010:swake_up_locked.part.5+0xa/0x40\n Call Trace:\n complete+0x31/0x40\n iscsi_iser_conn_stop+0x88/0xb0 [ib_iser]\n iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n iscsi_if_stop_conn+0x14a/0x150 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n iscsi_if_rx+0x1135/0x1834 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n ? netlink_lookup+0x12f/0x1b0\n ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x2c/0x200\n netlink_unicast+0x1ab/0x280\n netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0\n ? _copy_from_user+0x29/0x60\n sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70(CVE-2025-38700)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: do not BUG when INLINE_DATA_FL lacks system.data xattr\n\nA syzbot fuzzed image triggered a BUG_ON in ext4_update_inline_data()\nwhen an inode had the INLINE_DATA_FL flag set but was missing the\nsystem.data extended attribute.\n\nSince this can happen due to a maiciouly fuzzed file system, we\nshouldn\u0026apos;t BUG, but rather, report it as a corrupted file system.\n\nAdd similar replacements of BUG_ON with EXT4_ERROR_INODE() ii\next4_create_inline_data() and ext4_inline_data_truncate().(CVE-2025-38701)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nloop: Avoid updating block size under exclusive owner\n\nSyzbot came up with a reproducer where a loop device block size is\nchanged underneath a mounted filesystem. This causes a mismatch between\nthe block device block size and the block size stored in the superblock\ncausing confusion in various places such as fs/buffer.c. The particular\nissue triggered by syzbot was a warning in __getblk_slow() due to\nrequested buffer size not matching block device block size.\n\nFix the problem by getting exclusive hold of the loop device to change\nits block size. This fails if somebody (such as filesystem) has already\nan exclusive ownership of the block device and thus prevents modifying\nthe loop device under some exclusive owner which doesn\u0026apos;t expect it.(CVE-2025-38709)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110\nRead of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0\nCPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390\n print_report+0xb4/0x270\n kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0\n end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110\n end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80\n blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720\n scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0\n scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480\n ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160\n blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90\n handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370\n irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n\n Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens\n as follows:\n mount IRQ\nntfs_fill_super\n read_cache_page\n do_read_cache_folio\n filemap_read_folio\n mpage_read_folio\n\t do_mpage_readpage\n\t ntfs_get_block_vbo\n\t bh_read\n\t submit_bh\n\t wait_on_buffer(bh);\n\t blk_complete_reqs\n\t\t\t\t scsi_io_completion\n\t\t\t\t scsi_end_request\n\t\t\t\t blk_update_request\n\t\t\t\t end_bio_bh_io_sync\n\t\t\t\t\t end_buffer_read_sync\n\t\t\t\t\t __end_buffer_read_notouch\n\t\t\t\t\t unlock_buffer\n\n wait_on_buffer(bh);--\u0026gt; return will return to caller\n\n\t\t\t\t\t put_bh\n\t\t\t\t\t --\u0026gt; trigger stack-out-of-bounds\nIn the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable \u0026apos;map_bh\u0026apos; is\npassed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and\nwait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable\nis likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync()\nprocess, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.\n\nIf the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing\na buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which\nwill fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call\nput_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().(CVE-2025-39691)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don\u0026apos;t read past the ELF header\n\nWhen the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized\nbeforehand, but that\u0026apos;s not necessary the case for other clients.\n\nValidate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don\u0026apos;t read\npast the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize\nare validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in\nthe traversal are valid.(CVE-2025-39787)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nblock: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits()\n\nIn blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t-\u0026gt;chunk_sectors value is a\nmultiple of the t-\u0026gt;physical_block_size value.\n\nHowever, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow\nthe unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be\nbased on sectors.(CVE-2025-39795)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npcmcia: Add error handling for add_interval() in do_validate_mem()\n\nIn the do_validate_mem(), the call to add_interval() does not\nhandle errors. If kmalloc() fails in add_interval(), it could\nresult in a null pointer being inserted into the linked list,\nleading to illegal memory access when sub_interval() is called\nnext.\n\nThis patch adds an error handling for the add_interval(). If\nadd_interval() returns an error, the function will return early\nwith the error code.(CVE-2025-39920)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees\n\nWhen we don\u0026apos;t have a clock specified in the device tree, we have no way to\nensure the BAM is on. This is often the case for remotely-controlled or\nremotely-powered BAM instances. In this case, we need to read num-channels\nfrom the DT to have all the necessary information to complete probing.\n\nHowever, at the moment invalid device trees without clock and without\nnum-channels still continue probing, because the error handling is missing\nreturn statements. The driver will then later try to read the number of\nchannels from the registers. This is unsafe, because it relies on boot\nfirmware and lucky timing to succeed. Unfortunately, the lack of proper\nerror handling here has been abused for several Qualcomm SoCs upstream,\ncausing early boot crashes in several situations [1, 2].\n\nAvoid these early crashes by erroring out when any of the required DT\nproperties are missing. Note that this will break some of the existing DTs\nupstream (mainly BAM instances related to the crypto engine). However,\nclearly these DTs have never been tested properly, since the error in the\nkernel log was just ignored. It\u0026apos;s safer to disable the crypto engine for\nthese broken DTBs.\n\n[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-39923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel i40e driver, there is a security vulnerability: the driver lacks boundary checks for the maximum number of virtual function (VF) filters. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to request filter counts beyond the boundaries, leading to potential security issues.(CVE-2025-39968)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mce: use is_copy_from_user() to determine copy-from-user context\n\nPatch series \u0026quot;mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling\u0026quot;,\nv4.\n\n## 1. What am I trying to do:\n\nThis patchset resolves two critical regressions related to memory failure\nhandling that have appeared in the upstream kernel since version 5.17, as\ncompared to 5.10 LTS.\n\n - copyin case: poison found in user page while kernel copying from user space\n - instr case: poison found while instruction fetching in user space\n\n## 2. What is the expected outcome and why\n\n- For copyin case:\n\nKernel can recover from poison found where kernel is doing get_user() or\ncopy_from_user() if those places get an error return and the kernel return\n-EFAULT to the process instead of crashing. More specifily, MCE handler\nchecks the fixup handler type to decide whether an in kernel #MC can be\nrecovered. When EX_TYPE_UACCESS is found, the PC jumps to recovery code\nspecified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() and return a -EFAULT to user space.\n\n- For instr case:\n\nIf a poison found while instruction fetching in user space, full recovery\nis possible. User process takes #PF, Linux allocates a new page and fills\nby reading from storage.\n\n\n## 3. What actually happens and why\n\n- For copyin case: kernel panic since v5.17\n\nCommit 4c132d1d844a (\u0026quot;x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage\u0026quot;) introduced a new\nextable fixup type, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, and later patches updated the\nextable fixup type for copy-from-user operations, changing it from\nEX_TYPE_UACCESS to EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG. It breaks previous EX_TYPE_UACCESS\nhandling when posion found in get_user() or copy_from_user().\n\n- For instr case: user process is killed by a SIGBUS signal due to #CMCI\n and #MCE race\n\nWhen an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the\nCMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA\nsignature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when\nthe data is about to be consumed.\n\n### Background: why *UN*corrected errors tied to *C*MCI in Intel platform [1]\n\nPrior to Icelake memory controllers reported patrol scrub events that\ndetected a previously unseen uncorrected error in memory by signaling a\nbroadcast machine check with an SRAO (Software Recoverable Action\nOptional) signature in the machine check bank. This was overkill because\nit\u0026apos;s not an urgent problem that no core is on the verge of consuming that\nbad data. It\u0026apos;s also found that multi SRAO UCE may cause nested MCE\ninterrupts and finally become an IERR.\n\nHence, Intel downgrades the machine check bank signature of patrol scrub\nfrom SRAO to UCNA (Uncorrected, No Action required), and signal changed to\n#CMCI. Just to add to the confusion, Linux does take an action (in\nuc_decode_notifier()) to try to offline the page despite the UC*NA*\nsignature name.\n\n### Background: why #CMCI and #MCE race when poison is consuming in\n Intel platform [1]\n\nHaving decided that CMCI/UCNA is the best action for patrol scrub errors,\nthe memory controller uses it for reads too. But the memory controller is\nexecuting asynchronously from the core, and can\u0026apos;t tell the difference\nbetween a \u0026quot;real\u0026quot; read and a speculative read. So it will do CMCI/UCNA if\nan error is found in any read.\n\nThus:\n\n1) Core is clever and thinks address A is needed soon, issues a\n speculative read.\n\n2) Core finds it is going to use address A soon after sending the read\n request\n\n3) The CMCI from the memory controller is in a race with MCE from the\n core that will soon try to retire the load from address A.\n\nQuite often (because speculation has got better) the CMCI from the memory\ncontroller is delivered before the core is committed to the instruction\nreading address A, so the interrupt is taken, and Linux offlines the page\n(marking it as poison).\n\n\n## Why user process is killed for instr case\n\nCommit 046545a661af (\u0026quot;mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported\n\u0026quot;not\n---truncated---(CVE-2025-39989)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2532",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:37Z",
"published": "2025-10-24T11:09:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2532"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37792"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37914"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38414"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38700"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38701"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39691"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39787"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39989"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-21801",
"CVE-2025-37792",
"CVE-2025-37914",
"CVE-2025-37931",
"CVE-2025-38313",
"CVE-2025-38333",
"CVE-2025-38414",
"CVE-2025-38615",
"CVE-2025-38700",
"CVE-2025-38701",
"CVE-2025-38709",
"CVE-2025-39691",
"CVE-2025-39787",
"CVE-2025-39795",
"CVE-2025-39920",
"CVE-2025-39923",
"CVE-2025-39968",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39989"
]
}
OESA-2025-2536 (CVE-2025-21801)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-24 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend/resume path
Fix the suspend/resume path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where required. Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be performed under the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo operations.
Without this fix, the following warning is triggered: [ 39.032969] ============================= [ 39.032983] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 39.033019] ----------------------------- [ 39.033033] drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:2004 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! ... [ 39.033597] stack backtrace: [ 39.033613] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-next-20250116-arm64-renesas-00002-g35245dfdc62c #7 [ 39.033623] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on r9a08g045s33 (DT) [ 39.033628] Call trace: [ 39.033633] show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) [ 39.033652] dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0xc4 [ 39.033664] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 39.033671] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x16c/0x22c [ 39.033682] phy_detach+0x160/0x190 [ 39.033694] phy_disconnect+0x40/0x54 [ 39.033703] ravb_close+0x6c/0x1cc [ 39.033714] ravb_suspend+0x48/0x120 [ 39.033721] dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x14c [ 39.033731] device_suspend+0x11c/0x4dc [ 39.033740] dpm_suspend+0xdc/0x214 [ 39.033748] dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x60 [ 39.033758] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x124/0x574 [ 39.033769] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x274 [ 39.033778] state_store+0x88/0x124 [ 39.033788] kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24 [ 39.033798] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x6c [ 39.033808] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 [ 39.033817] vfs_write+0x27c/0x378 [ 39.033825] ksys_write+0x64/0xf4 [ 39.033833] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 39.033841] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104 [ 39.033852] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4 [ 39.033862] do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20 [ 39.033870] el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0 [ 39.033880] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4 [ 39.033888] el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158 [ 39.041274] ravb 11c30000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down(CVE-2025-21801)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: renesas_usbhs: Flush the notify_hotplug_work
When performing continuous unbind/bind operations on the USB drivers available on the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC, a kernel crash with the message "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address" may occur. This issue points to the usbhsc_notify_hotplug() function.
Flush the delayed work to avoid its execution when driver resources are unavailable.(CVE-2025-21917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: btrtl: Prevent potential NULL dereference
The btrtl_initialize() function checks that rtl_load_file() either had an error or it loaded a zero length file. However, if it loaded a zero length file then the error code is not set correctly. It results in an error pointer vs NULL bug, followed by a NULL pointer dereference. This was detected by Smatch:
drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'(CVE-2025-37792)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: ets: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report 1, there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of ets, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before doing the addition to cater for the reentrant case.
1 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37914)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: adjust subpage bit start based on sectorsize
When running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started seeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because we were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects all metadata writes.
When writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty range. If the range isn't dirty we do
bit_start++;
to move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the number of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k pagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4 bits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per page.
To make this easier this is how everything looks
[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address [0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset [ 64k page ] folio [ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers [ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap
Now we use all of our addressing based on fs_info->sectorsize_bits, so as you can see the above our 16k eb->start turns into radix entry 4.
When we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start += sectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the next eb is 4, to correspond to eb->start 16k.
However if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now put us offset from our radix tree entries.
In our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is not dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop around and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that start using the following equation
start = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info->sectorsize;
so in the case above, eb->start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start as
0 + 1 * fs_info->sectorsize = 4096
4096 >> 12 = 1
Now we're looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won't find an eb. What's worse is now we're using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start += sectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into the same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the radix tree, and now we're skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.
The best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes, but that's a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix it simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.(CVE-2025-37931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev
The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.
In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.
This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive.
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);(CVE-2025-38313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to bail out in get_new_segment()
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 579 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2832 new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc pc : new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc Call trace: new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xa54/0xe28 do_write_page+0x6c/0x194 f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x38/0x78 __write_node_page+0x248/0x6d4 f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x524/0x72c f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x4bc/0x9b0 __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0x80/0x244 issue_checkpoint_thread+0x8c/0xec kthread+0x114/0x1bc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
get_new_segment() detects inconsistent status in between free_segmap and free_secmap, let's record such error into super block, and bail out get_new_segment() instead of continue using the segment.(CVE-2025-38333)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850
GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST is wrongly defined for WCN7850, causing kernel crash on some specific platforms.
Since this register is divergent for WCN7850 and QCN9274, move it to register table to allow different definitions. Then correct the register address for WCN7850 to fix this issue.
Note IPQ5332 is not affected as it is not PCIe based device.
Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3(CVE-2025-38414)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: cancle set bad inode after removing name fails
The reproducer uses a file0 on a ntfs3 file system with a corrupted i_link. When renaming, the file0's inode is marked as a bad inode because the file name cannot be deleted.
The underlying bug is that make_bad_inode() is called on a live inode. In some cases it's "icache lookup finds a normal inode, d_splice_alias() is called to attach it to dentry, while another thread decides to call make_bad_inode() on it - that would evict it from icache, but we'd already found it there earlier". In some it's outright "we have an inode attached to dentry - that's how we got it in the first place; let's call make_bad_inode() on it just for shits and giggles".(CVE-2025-38615)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libiscsi: Initialize iscsi_conn->dd_data only if memory is allocated
In case of an ib_fast_reg_mr allocation failure during iSER setup, the machine hits a panic because iscsi_conn->dd_data is initialized unconditionally, even when no memory is allocated (dd_size == 0). This leads invalid pointer dereference during connection teardown.
Fix by setting iscsi_conn->dd_data only if memory is actually allocated.
Panic trace:
iser: iser_create_fastreg_desc: Failed to allocate ib_fast_reg_mr err=-12 iser: iser_alloc_rx_descriptors: failed allocating rx descriptors / data buffers BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8 RIP: 0010:swake_up_locked.part.5+0xa/0x40 Call Trace: complete+0x31/0x40 iscsi_iser_conn_stop+0x88/0xb0 [ib_iser] iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi] iscsi_if_stop_conn+0x14a/0x150 [scsi_transport_iscsi] iscsi_if_rx+0x1135/0x1834 [scsi_transport_iscsi] ? netlink_lookup+0x12f/0x1b0 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x2c/0x200 netlink_unicast+0x1ab/0x280 netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0 ? _copy_from_user+0x29/0x60 sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70(CVE-2025-38700)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: do not BUG when INLINE_DATA_FL lacks system.data xattr
A syzbot fuzzed image triggered a BUG_ON in ext4_update_inline_data() when an inode had the INLINE_DATA_FL flag set but was missing the system.data extended attribute.
Since this can happen due to a maiciouly fuzzed file system, we shouldn't BUG, but rather, report it as a corrupted file system.
Add similar replacements of BUG_ON with EXT4_ERROR_INODE() ii ext4_create_inline_data() and ext4_inline_data_truncate().(CVE-2025-38701)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
loop: Avoid updating block size under exclusive owner
Syzbot came up with a reproducer where a loop device block size is changed underneath a mounted filesystem. This causes a mismatch between the block device block size and the block size stored in the superblock causing confusion in various places such as fs/buffer.c. The particular issue triggered by syzbot was a warning in __getblk_slow() due to requested buffer size not matching block device block size.
Fix the problem by getting exclusive hold of the loop device to change its block size. This fails if somebody (such as filesystem) has already an exclusive ownership of the block device and thus prevents modifying the loop device under some exclusive owner which doesn't expect it.(CVE-2025-38709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ>
Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer
wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller
put_bh
--> trigger stack-out-of-bounds
In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.
If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().(CVE-2025-39691)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in the traversal are valid.(CVE-2025-39787)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits()
In blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t->chunk_sectors value is a multiple of the t->physical_block_size value.
However, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow the unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be based on sectors.(CVE-2025-39795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pcmcia: Add error handling for add_interval() in do_validate_mem()
In the do_validate_mem(), the call to add_interval() does not handle errors. If kmalloc() fails in add_interval(), it could result in a null pointer being inserted into the linked list, leading to illegal memory access when sub_interval() is called next.
This patch adds an error handling for the add_interval(). If add_interval() returns an error, the function will return early with the error code.(CVE-2025-39920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees
When we don't have a clock specified in the device tree, we have no way to ensure the BAM is on. This is often the case for remotely-controlled or remotely-powered BAM instances. In this case, we need to read num-channels from the DT to have all the necessary information to complete probing.
However, at the moment invalid device trees without clock and without num-channels still continue probing, because the error handling is missing return statements. The driver will then later try to read the number of channels from the registers. This is unsafe, because it relies on boot firmware and lucky timing to succeed. Unfortunately, the lack of proper error handling here has been abused for several Qualcomm SoCs upstream, causing early boot crashes in several situations [1, 2].
Avoid these early crashes by erroring out when any of the required DT properties are missing. Note that this will break some of the existing DTs upstream (mainly BAM instances related to the crypto engine). However, clearly these DTs have never been tested properly, since the error in the kernel log was just ignored. It's safer to disable the crypto engine for these broken DTBs.
In the Linux kernel i40e driver, there is a security vulnerability: the driver lacks boundary checks for the maximum number of virtual function (VF) filters. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to request filter counts beyond the boundaries, leading to potential security issues.(CVE-2025-39968)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mce: use is_copy_from_user() to determine copy-from-user context
Patch series "mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling", v4.
1. What am I trying to do:
This patchset resolves two critical regressions related to memory failure handling that have appeared in the upstream kernel since version 5.17, as compared to 5.10 LTS.
- copyin case: poison found in user page while kernel copying from user space
- instr case: poison found while instruction fetching in user space
2. What is the expected outcome and why
- For copyin case:
Kernel can recover from poison found where kernel is doing get_user() or copy_from_user() if those places get an error return and the kernel return -EFAULT to the process instead of crashing. More specifily, MCE handler checks the fixup handler type to decide whether an in kernel #MC can be recovered. When EX_TYPE_UACCESS is found, the PC jumps to recovery code specified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() and return a -EFAULT to user space.
- For instr case:
If a poison found while instruction fetching in user space, full recovery is possible. User process takes #PF, Linux allocates a new page and fills by reading from storage.
3. What actually happens and why
- For copyin case: kernel panic since v5.17
Commit 4c132d1d844a ("x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage") introduced a new extable fixup type, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, and later patches updated the extable fixup type for copy-from-user operations, changing it from EX_TYPE_UACCESS to EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG. It breaks previous EX_TYPE_UACCESS handling when posion found in get_user() or copy_from_user().
- For instr case: user process is killed by a SIGBUS signal due to #CMCI and #MCE race
When an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the CMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA signature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when the data is about to be consumed.
Background: why UNcorrected errors tied to CMCI in Intel platform 1
Prior to Icelake memory controllers reported patrol scrub events that detected a previously unseen uncorrected error in memory by signaling a broadcast machine check with an SRAO (Software Recoverable Action Optional) signature in the machine check bank. This was overkill because it's not an urgent problem that no core is on the verge of consuming that bad data. It's also found that multi SRAO UCE may cause nested MCE interrupts and finally become an IERR.
Hence, Intel downgrades the machine check bank signature of patrol scrub from SRAO to UCNA (Uncorrected, No Action required), and signal changed to
CMCI. Just to add to the confusion, Linux does take an action (in
uc_decode_notifier()) to try to offline the page despite the UCNA signature name.
Background: why #CMCI and #MCE race when poison is consuming in
Intel platform [1]
Having decided that CMCI/UCNA is the best action for patrol scrub errors, the memory controller uses it for reads too. But the memory controller is executing asynchronously from the core, and can't tell the difference between a "real" read and a speculative read. So it will do CMCI/UCNA if an error is found in any read.
Thus:
1) Core is clever and thinks address A is needed soon, issues a speculative read.
2) Core finds it is going to use address A soon after sending the read request
3) The CMCI from the memory controller is in a race with MCE from the core that will soon try to retire the load from address A.
Quite often (because speculation has got better) the CMCI from the memory controller is delivered before the core is committed to the instruction reading address A, so the interrupt is taken, and Linux offlines the page (marking it as poison).
Why user process is killed for instr case
Commit 046545a661af ("mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported "not ---truncated---(CVE-2025-39989)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-113.0.0.105.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend/resume path\n\nFix the suspend/resume path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where\nrequired. Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be\nperformed under the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo\noperations.\n\nWithout this fix, the following warning is triggered:\n[ 39.032969] =============================\n[ 39.032983] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n[ 39.033019] -----------------------------\n[ 39.033033] drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:2004 suspicious\nrcu_dereference_protected() usage!\n...\n[ 39.033597] stack backtrace:\n[ 39.033613] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: python3 Not tainted\n6.13.0-rc7-next-20250116-arm64-renesas-00002-g35245dfdc62c #7\n[ 39.033623] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on\nr9a08g045s33 (DT)\n[ 39.033628] Call trace:\n[ 39.033633] show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C)\n[ 39.033652] dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0xc4\n[ 39.033664] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c\n[ 39.033671] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x16c/0x22c\n[ 39.033682] phy_detach+0x160/0x190\n[ 39.033694] phy_disconnect+0x40/0x54\n[ 39.033703] ravb_close+0x6c/0x1cc\n[ 39.033714] ravb_suspend+0x48/0x120\n[ 39.033721] dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x14c\n[ 39.033731] device_suspend+0x11c/0x4dc\n[ 39.033740] dpm_suspend+0xdc/0x214\n[ 39.033748] dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x60\n[ 39.033758] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x124/0x574\n[ 39.033769] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x274\n[ 39.033778] state_store+0x88/0x124\n[ 39.033788] kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24\n[ 39.033798] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x6c\n[ 39.033808] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8\n[ 39.033817] vfs_write+0x27c/0x378\n[ 39.033825] ksys_write+0x64/0xf4\n[ 39.033833] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20\n[ 39.033841] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104\n[ 39.033852] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4\n[ 39.033862] do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20\n[ 39.033870] el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0\n[ 39.033880] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4\n[ 39.033888] el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158\n[ 39.041274] ravb 11c30000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down(CVE-2025-21801)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: renesas_usbhs: Flush the notify_hotplug_work\n\nWhen performing continuous unbind/bind operations on the USB drivers\navailable on the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC, a kernel crash with the message\n\u0026quot;Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address\u0026quot;\nmay occur. This issue points to the usbhsc_notify_hotplug() function.\n\nFlush the delayed work to avoid its execution when driver resources are\nunavailable.(CVE-2025-21917)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: btrtl: Prevent potential NULL dereference\n\nThe btrtl_initialize() function checks that rtl_load_file() either\nhad an error or it loaded a zero length file. However, if it loaded\na zero length file then the error code is not set correctly. It\nresults in an error pointer vs NULL bug, followed by a NULL pointer\ndereference. This was detected by Smatch:\n\ndrivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize() warn: passing zero to \u0026apos;ERR_PTR\u0026apos;(CVE-2025-37792)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: ets: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of ets, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether\nthe class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before\ndoing the addition to cater for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37914)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: adjust subpage bit start based on sectorsize\n\nWhen running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started\nseeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because\nwe were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects\nall metadata writes.\n\nWhen writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty\nrange. If the range isn\u0026apos;t dirty we do\n\n\tbit_start++;\n\nto move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the\nnumber of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k\npagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4\nbits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per\npage.\n\nTo make this easier this is how everything looks\n\n[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address\n[0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset\n[ 64k page ] folio\n[ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers\n[ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap\n\nNow we use all of our addressing based on fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize_bits, so\nas you can see the above our 16k eb-\u0026gt;start turns into radix entry 4.\n\nWhen we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start +=\nsectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the\nnext eb is 4, to correspond to eb-\u0026gt;start 16k.\n\nHowever if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now\nput us offset from our radix tree entries.\n\nIn our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is\nnot dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop\naround and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that\nstart using the following equation\n\n\tstart = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize;\n\nso in the case above, eb-\u0026gt;start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start\nas\n\n\t0 + 1 * fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize = 4096\n\t4096 \u0026gt;\u0026gt; 12 = 1\n\nNow we\u0026apos;re looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won\u0026apos;t find an eb.\nWhat\u0026apos;s worse is now we\u0026apos;re using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start +=\nsectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into\nthe same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the\nradix tree, and now we\u0026apos;re skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.\n\nThe best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes,\nbut that\u0026apos;s a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix\nit simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.(CVE-2025-37931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev\n\nThe blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but,\nin the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.\n\nIn case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the\nmc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this\ncircumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.\n\nThis commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a\nfalse-positive.\n\nWARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required\n+ if (mc_bus)\n+ kfree(mc_bus);(CVE-2025-38313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to bail out in get_new_segment()\n\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 579 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2832 new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\npc : new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\nCall trace:\n new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\n f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xa54/0xe28\n do_write_page+0x6c/0x194\n f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x38/0x78\n __write_node_page+0x248/0x6d4\n f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x524/0x72c\n f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x4bc/0x9b0\n __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0x80/0x244\n issue_checkpoint_thread+0x8c/0xec\n kthread+0x114/0x1bc\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n\nget_new_segment() detects inconsistent status in between free_segmap\nand free_secmap, let\u0026apos;s record such error into super block, and bail\nout get_new_segment() instead of continue using the segment.(CVE-2025-38333)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850\n\nGCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST is wrongly defined for WCN7850, causing kernel crash\non some specific platforms.\n\nSince this register is divergent for WCN7850 and QCN9274, move it to\nregister table to allow different definitions. Then correct the register\naddress for WCN7850 to fix this issue.\n\nNote IPQ5332 is not affected as it is not PCIe based device.\n\nTested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3(CVE-2025-38414)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/ntfs3: cancle set bad inode after removing name fails\n\nThe reproducer uses a file0 on a ntfs3 file system with a corrupted i_link.\nWhen renaming, the file0\u0026apos;s inode is marked as a bad inode because the file\nname cannot be deleted.\n\nThe underlying bug is that make_bad_inode() is called on a live inode.\nIn some cases it\u0026apos;s \u0026quot;icache lookup finds a normal inode, d_splice_alias()\nis called to attach it to dentry, while another thread decides to call\nmake_bad_inode() on it - that would evict it from icache, but we\u0026apos;d already\nfound it there earlier\u0026quot;.\nIn some it\u0026apos;s outright \u0026quot;we have an inode attached to dentry - that\u0026apos;s how we\ngot it in the first place; let\u0026apos;s call make_bad_inode() on it just for shits\nand giggles\u0026quot;.(CVE-2025-38615)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: libiscsi: Initialize iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data only if memory is allocated\n\nIn case of an ib_fast_reg_mr allocation failure during iSER setup, the\nmachine hits a panic because iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data is initialized\nunconditionally, even when no memory is allocated (dd_size == 0). This\nleads invalid pointer dereference during connection teardown.\n\nFix by setting iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data only if memory is actually allocated.\n\nPanic trace:\n------------\n iser: iser_create_fastreg_desc: Failed to allocate ib_fast_reg_mr err=-12\n iser: iser_alloc_rx_descriptors: failed allocating rx descriptors / data buffers\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8\n RIP: 0010:swake_up_locked.part.5+0xa/0x40\n Call Trace:\n complete+0x31/0x40\n iscsi_iser_conn_stop+0x88/0xb0 [ib_iser]\n iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n iscsi_if_stop_conn+0x14a/0x150 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n iscsi_if_rx+0x1135/0x1834 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n ? netlink_lookup+0x12f/0x1b0\n ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x2c/0x200\n netlink_unicast+0x1ab/0x280\n netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0\n ? _copy_from_user+0x29/0x60\n sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70(CVE-2025-38700)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: do not BUG when INLINE_DATA_FL lacks system.data xattr\n\nA syzbot fuzzed image triggered a BUG_ON in ext4_update_inline_data()\nwhen an inode had the INLINE_DATA_FL flag set but was missing the\nsystem.data extended attribute.\n\nSince this can happen due to a maiciouly fuzzed file system, we\nshouldn\u0026apos;t BUG, but rather, report it as a corrupted file system.\n\nAdd similar replacements of BUG_ON with EXT4_ERROR_INODE() ii\next4_create_inline_data() and ext4_inline_data_truncate().(CVE-2025-38701)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nloop: Avoid updating block size under exclusive owner\n\nSyzbot came up with a reproducer where a loop device block size is\nchanged underneath a mounted filesystem. This causes a mismatch between\nthe block device block size and the block size stored in the superblock\ncausing confusion in various places such as fs/buffer.c. The particular\nissue triggered by syzbot was a warning in __getblk_slow() due to\nrequested buffer size not matching block device block size.\n\nFix the problem by getting exclusive hold of the loop device to change\nits block size. This fails if somebody (such as filesystem) has already\nan exclusive ownership of the block device and thus prevents modifying\nthe loop device under some exclusive owner which doesn\u0026apos;t expect it.(CVE-2025-38709)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110\nRead of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0\nCPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390\n print_report+0xb4/0x270\n kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0\n end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110\n end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80\n blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720\n scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0\n scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480\n ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160\n blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90\n handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370\n irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n\n Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens\n as follows:\n mount IRQ\nntfs_fill_super\n read_cache_page\n do_read_cache_folio\n filemap_read_folio\n mpage_read_folio\n\t do_mpage_readpage\n\t ntfs_get_block_vbo\n\t bh_read\n\t submit_bh\n\t wait_on_buffer(bh);\n\t blk_complete_reqs\n\t\t\t\t scsi_io_completion\n\t\t\t\t scsi_end_request\n\t\t\t\t blk_update_request\n\t\t\t\t end_bio_bh_io_sync\n\t\t\t\t\t end_buffer_read_sync\n\t\t\t\t\t __end_buffer_read_notouch\n\t\t\t\t\t unlock_buffer\n\n wait_on_buffer(bh);--\u0026gt; return will return to caller\n\n\t\t\t\t\t put_bh\n\t\t\t\t\t --\u0026gt; trigger stack-out-of-bounds\nIn the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable \u0026apos;map_bh\u0026apos; is\npassed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and\nwait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable\nis likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync()\nprocess, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.\n\nIf the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing\na buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which\nwill fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call\nput_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().(CVE-2025-39691)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don\u0026apos;t read past the ELF header\n\nWhen the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized\nbeforehand, but that\u0026apos;s not necessary the case for other clients.\n\nValidate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don\u0026apos;t read\npast the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize\nare validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in\nthe traversal are valid.(CVE-2025-39787)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nblock: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits()\n\nIn blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t-\u0026gt;chunk_sectors value is a\nmultiple of the t-\u0026gt;physical_block_size value.\n\nHowever, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow\nthe unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be\nbased on sectors.(CVE-2025-39795)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npcmcia: Add error handling for add_interval() in do_validate_mem()\n\nIn the do_validate_mem(), the call to add_interval() does not\nhandle errors. If kmalloc() fails in add_interval(), it could\nresult in a null pointer being inserted into the linked list,\nleading to illegal memory access when sub_interval() is called\nnext.\n\nThis patch adds an error handling for the add_interval(). If\nadd_interval() returns an error, the function will return early\nwith the error code.(CVE-2025-39920)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees\n\nWhen we don\u0026apos;t have a clock specified in the device tree, we have no way to\nensure the BAM is on. This is often the case for remotely-controlled or\nremotely-powered BAM instances. In this case, we need to read num-channels\nfrom the DT to have all the necessary information to complete probing.\n\nHowever, at the moment invalid device trees without clock and without\nnum-channels still continue probing, because the error handling is missing\nreturn statements. The driver will then later try to read the number of\nchannels from the registers. This is unsafe, because it relies on boot\nfirmware and lucky timing to succeed. Unfortunately, the lack of proper\nerror handling here has been abused for several Qualcomm SoCs upstream,\ncausing early boot crashes in several situations [1, 2].\n\nAvoid these early crashes by erroring out when any of the required DT\nproperties are missing. Note that this will break some of the existing DTs\nupstream (mainly BAM instances related to the crypto engine). However,\nclearly these DTs have never been tested properly, since the error in the\nkernel log was just ignored. It\u0026apos;s safer to disable the crypto engine for\nthese broken DTBs.\n\n[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-39923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel i40e driver, there is a security vulnerability: the driver lacks boundary checks for the maximum number of virtual function (VF) filters. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to request filter counts beyond the boundaries, leading to potential security issues.(CVE-2025-39968)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mce: use is_copy_from_user() to determine copy-from-user context\n\nPatch series \u0026quot;mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling\u0026quot;,\nv4.\n\n## 1. What am I trying to do:\n\nThis patchset resolves two critical regressions related to memory failure\nhandling that have appeared in the upstream kernel since version 5.17, as\ncompared to 5.10 LTS.\n\n - copyin case: poison found in user page while kernel copying from user space\n - instr case: poison found while instruction fetching in user space\n\n## 2. What is the expected outcome and why\n\n- For copyin case:\n\nKernel can recover from poison found where kernel is doing get_user() or\ncopy_from_user() if those places get an error return and the kernel return\n-EFAULT to the process instead of crashing. More specifily, MCE handler\nchecks the fixup handler type to decide whether an in kernel #MC can be\nrecovered. When EX_TYPE_UACCESS is found, the PC jumps to recovery code\nspecified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() and return a -EFAULT to user space.\n\n- For instr case:\n\nIf a poison found while instruction fetching in user space, full recovery\nis possible. User process takes #PF, Linux allocates a new page and fills\nby reading from storage.\n\n\n## 3. What actually happens and why\n\n- For copyin case: kernel panic since v5.17\n\nCommit 4c132d1d844a (\u0026quot;x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage\u0026quot;) introduced a new\nextable fixup type, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, and later patches updated the\nextable fixup type for copy-from-user operations, changing it from\nEX_TYPE_UACCESS to EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG. It breaks previous EX_TYPE_UACCESS\nhandling when posion found in get_user() or copy_from_user().\n\n- For instr case: user process is killed by a SIGBUS signal due to #CMCI\n and #MCE race\n\nWhen an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the\nCMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA\nsignature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when\nthe data is about to be consumed.\n\n### Background: why *UN*corrected errors tied to *C*MCI in Intel platform [1]\n\nPrior to Icelake memory controllers reported patrol scrub events that\ndetected a previously unseen uncorrected error in memory by signaling a\nbroadcast machine check with an SRAO (Software Recoverable Action\nOptional) signature in the machine check bank. This was overkill because\nit\u0026apos;s not an urgent problem that no core is on the verge of consuming that\nbad data. It\u0026apos;s also found that multi SRAO UCE may cause nested MCE\ninterrupts and finally become an IERR.\n\nHence, Intel downgrades the machine check bank signature of patrol scrub\nfrom SRAO to UCNA (Uncorrected, No Action required), and signal changed to\n#CMCI. Just to add to the confusion, Linux does take an action (in\nuc_decode_notifier()) to try to offline the page despite the UC*NA*\nsignature name.\n\n### Background: why #CMCI and #MCE race when poison is consuming in\n Intel platform [1]\n\nHaving decided that CMCI/UCNA is the best action for patrol scrub errors,\nthe memory controller uses it for reads too. But the memory controller is\nexecuting asynchronously from the core, and can\u0026apos;t tell the difference\nbetween a \u0026quot;real\u0026quot; read and a speculative read. So it will do CMCI/UCNA if\nan error is found in any read.\n\nThus:\n\n1) Core is clever and thinks address A is needed soon, issues a\n speculative read.\n\n2) Core finds it is going to use address A soon after sending the read\n request\n\n3) The CMCI from the memory controller is in a race with MCE from the\n core that will soon try to retire the load from address A.\n\nQuite often (because speculation has got better) the CMCI from the memory\ncontroller is delivered before the core is committed to the instruction\nreading address A, so the interrupt is taken, and Linux offlines the page\n(marking it as poison).\n\n\n## Why user process is killed for instr case\n\nCommit 046545a661af (\u0026quot;mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported\n\u0026quot;not\n---truncated---(CVE-2025-39989)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2536",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:37Z",
"published": "2025-10-24T11:09:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2536"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37792"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37914"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38414"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38700"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38701"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39691"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39787"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39989"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-21801",
"CVE-2025-21917",
"CVE-2025-37792",
"CVE-2025-37914",
"CVE-2025-37931",
"CVE-2025-38313",
"CVE-2025-38333",
"CVE-2025-38414",
"CVE-2025-38615",
"CVE-2025-38700",
"CVE-2025-38701",
"CVE-2025-38709",
"CVE-2025-39691",
"CVE-2025-39787",
"CVE-2025-39795",
"CVE-2025-39920",
"CVE-2025-39923",
"CVE-2025-39968",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39989"
]
}
OESA-2025-2537 (CVE-2025-21801)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-24 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend/resume path
Fix the suspend/resume path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where required. Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be performed under the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo operations.
Without this fix, the following warning is triggered: [ 39.032969] ============================= [ 39.032983] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 39.033019] ----------------------------- [ 39.033033] drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:2004 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! ... [ 39.033597] stack backtrace: [ 39.033613] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-next-20250116-arm64-renesas-00002-g35245dfdc62c #7 [ 39.033623] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on r9a08g045s33 (DT) [ 39.033628] Call trace: [ 39.033633] show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) [ 39.033652] dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0xc4 [ 39.033664] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 39.033671] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x16c/0x22c [ 39.033682] phy_detach+0x160/0x190 [ 39.033694] phy_disconnect+0x40/0x54 [ 39.033703] ravb_close+0x6c/0x1cc [ 39.033714] ravb_suspend+0x48/0x120 [ 39.033721] dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x14c [ 39.033731] device_suspend+0x11c/0x4dc [ 39.033740] dpm_suspend+0xdc/0x214 [ 39.033748] dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x60 [ 39.033758] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x124/0x574 [ 39.033769] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x274 [ 39.033778] state_store+0x88/0x124 [ 39.033788] kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24 [ 39.033798] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x6c [ 39.033808] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8 [ 39.033817] vfs_write+0x27c/0x378 [ 39.033825] ksys_write+0x64/0xf4 [ 39.033833] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 39.033841] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104 [ 39.033852] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4 [ 39.033862] do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20 [ 39.033870] el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0 [ 39.033880] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4 [ 39.033888] el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158 [ 39.041274] ravb 11c30000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down(CVE-2025-21801)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: renesas_usbhs: Flush the notify_hotplug_work
When performing continuous unbind/bind operations on the USB drivers available on the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC, a kernel crash with the message "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address" may occur. This issue points to the usbhsc_notify_hotplug() function.
Flush the delayed work to avoid its execution when driver resources are unavailable.(CVE-2025-21917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: btrtl: Prevent potential NULL dereference
The btrtl_initialize() function checks that rtl_load_file() either had an error or it loaded a zero length file. However, if it loaded a zero length file then the error code is not set correctly. It results in an error pointer vs NULL bug, followed by a NULL pointer dereference. This was detected by Smatch:
drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'(CVE-2025-37792)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: ets: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report 1, there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of ets, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before doing the addition to cater for the reentrant case.
1 https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37914)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: adjust subpage bit start based on sectorsize
When running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started seeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because we were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects all metadata writes.
When writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty range. If the range isn't dirty we do
bit_start++;
to move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the number of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k pagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4 bits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per page.
To make this easier this is how everything looks
[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address [0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset [ 64k page ] folio [ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers [ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap
Now we use all of our addressing based on fs_info->sectorsize_bits, so as you can see the above our 16k eb->start turns into radix entry 4.
When we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start += sectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the next eb is 4, to correspond to eb->start 16k.
However if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now put us offset from our radix tree entries.
In our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is not dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop around and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that start using the following equation
start = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info->sectorsize;
so in the case above, eb->start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start as
0 + 1 * fs_info->sectorsize = 4096
4096 >> 12 = 1
Now we're looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won't find an eb. What's worse is now we're using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start += sectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into the same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the radix tree, and now we're skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.
The best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes, but that's a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix it simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.(CVE-2025-37931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev
The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.
In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.
This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive.
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);(CVE-2025-38313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to bail out in get_new_segment()
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 579 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2832 new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc pc : new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc Call trace: new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xa54/0xe28 do_write_page+0x6c/0x194 f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x38/0x78 __write_node_page+0x248/0x6d4 f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x524/0x72c f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x4bc/0x9b0 __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0x80/0x244 issue_checkpoint_thread+0x8c/0xec kthread+0x114/0x1bc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
get_new_segment() detects inconsistent status in between free_segmap and free_secmap, let's record such error into super block, and bail out get_new_segment() instead of continue using the segment.(CVE-2025-38333)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850
GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST is wrongly defined for WCN7850, causing kernel crash on some specific platforms.
Since this register is divergent for WCN7850 and QCN9274, move it to register table to allow different definitions. Then correct the register address for WCN7850 to fix this issue.
Note IPQ5332 is not affected as it is not PCIe based device.
Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3(CVE-2025-38414)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: cancle set bad inode after removing name fails
The reproducer uses a file0 on a ntfs3 file system with a corrupted i_link. When renaming, the file0's inode is marked as a bad inode because the file name cannot be deleted.
The underlying bug is that make_bad_inode() is called on a live inode. In some cases it's "icache lookup finds a normal inode, d_splice_alias() is called to attach it to dentry, while another thread decides to call make_bad_inode() on it - that would evict it from icache, but we'd already found it there earlier". In some it's outright "we have an inode attached to dentry - that's how we got it in the first place; let's call make_bad_inode() on it just for shits and giggles".(CVE-2025-38615)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libiscsi: Initialize iscsi_conn->dd_data only if memory is allocated
In case of an ib_fast_reg_mr allocation failure during iSER setup, the machine hits a panic because iscsi_conn->dd_data is initialized unconditionally, even when no memory is allocated (dd_size == 0). This leads invalid pointer dereference during connection teardown.
Fix by setting iscsi_conn->dd_data only if memory is actually allocated.
Panic trace:
iser: iser_create_fastreg_desc: Failed to allocate ib_fast_reg_mr err=-12 iser: iser_alloc_rx_descriptors: failed allocating rx descriptors / data buffers BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8 RIP: 0010:swake_up_locked.part.5+0xa/0x40 Call Trace: complete+0x31/0x40 iscsi_iser_conn_stop+0x88/0xb0 [ib_iser] iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi] iscsi_if_stop_conn+0x14a/0x150 [scsi_transport_iscsi] iscsi_if_rx+0x1135/0x1834 [scsi_transport_iscsi] ? netlink_lookup+0x12f/0x1b0 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x2c/0x200 netlink_unicast+0x1ab/0x280 netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0 ? _copy_from_user+0x29/0x60 sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70(CVE-2025-38700)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: do not BUG when INLINE_DATA_FL lacks system.data xattr
A syzbot fuzzed image triggered a BUG_ON in ext4_update_inline_data() when an inode had the INLINE_DATA_FL flag set but was missing the system.data extended attribute.
Since this can happen due to a maiciouly fuzzed file system, we shouldn't BUG, but rather, report it as a corrupted file system.
Add similar replacements of BUG_ON with EXT4_ERROR_INODE() ii ext4_create_inline_data() and ext4_inline_data_truncate().(CVE-2025-38701)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
loop: Avoid updating block size under exclusive owner
Syzbot came up with a reproducer where a loop device block size is changed underneath a mounted filesystem. This causes a mismatch between the block device block size and the block size stored in the superblock causing confusion in various places such as fs/buffer.c. The particular issue triggered by syzbot was a warning in __getblk_slow() due to requested buffer size not matching block device block size.
Fix the problem by getting exclusive hold of the loop device to change its block size. This fails if somebody (such as filesystem) has already an exclusive ownership of the block device and thus prevents modifying the loop device under some exclusive owner which doesn't expect it.(CVE-2025-38709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ>
Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer
wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller
put_bh
--> trigger stack-out-of-bounds
In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.
If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().(CVE-2025-39691)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
When the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized beforehand, but that's not necessary the case for other clients.
Validate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don't read past the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize are validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in the traversal are valid.(CVE-2025-39787)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits()
In blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t->chunk_sectors value is a multiple of the t->physical_block_size value.
However, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow the unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be based on sectors.(CVE-2025-39795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pcmcia: Add error handling for add_interval() in do_validate_mem()
In the do_validate_mem(), the call to add_interval() does not handle errors. If kmalloc() fails in add_interval(), it could result in a null pointer being inserted into the linked list, leading to illegal memory access when sub_interval() is called next.
This patch adds an error handling for the add_interval(). If add_interval() returns an error, the function will return early with the error code.(CVE-2025-39920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees
When we don't have a clock specified in the device tree, we have no way to ensure the BAM is on. This is often the case for remotely-controlled or remotely-powered BAM instances. In this case, we need to read num-channels from the DT to have all the necessary information to complete probing.
However, at the moment invalid device trees without clock and without num-channels still continue probing, because the error handling is missing return statements. The driver will then later try to read the number of channels from the registers. This is unsafe, because it relies on boot firmware and lucky timing to succeed. Unfortunately, the lack of proper error handling here has been abused for several Qualcomm SoCs upstream, causing early boot crashes in several situations [1, 2].
Avoid these early crashes by erroring out when any of the required DT properties are missing. Note that this will break some of the existing DTs upstream (mainly BAM instances related to the crypto engine). However, clearly these DTs have never been tested properly, since the error in the kernel log was just ignored. It's safer to disable the crypto engine for these broken DTBs.
In the Linux kernel i40e driver, there is a security vulnerability: the driver lacks boundary checks for the maximum number of virtual function (VF) filters. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to request filter counts beyond the boundaries, leading to potential security issues.(CVE-2025-39968)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mce: use is_copy_from_user() to determine copy-from-user context
Patch series "mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling", v4.
1. What am I trying to do:
This patchset resolves two critical regressions related to memory failure handling that have appeared in the upstream kernel since version 5.17, as compared to 5.10 LTS.
- copyin case: poison found in user page while kernel copying from user space
- instr case: poison found while instruction fetching in user space
2. What is the expected outcome and why
- For copyin case:
Kernel can recover from poison found where kernel is doing get_user() or copy_from_user() if those places get an error return and the kernel return -EFAULT to the process instead of crashing. More specifily, MCE handler checks the fixup handler type to decide whether an in kernel #MC can be recovered. When EX_TYPE_UACCESS is found, the PC jumps to recovery code specified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() and return a -EFAULT to user space.
- For instr case:
If a poison found while instruction fetching in user space, full recovery is possible. User process takes #PF, Linux allocates a new page and fills by reading from storage.
3. What actually happens and why
- For copyin case: kernel panic since v5.17
Commit 4c132d1d844a ("x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage") introduced a new extable fixup type, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, and later patches updated the extable fixup type for copy-from-user operations, changing it from EX_TYPE_UACCESS to EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG. It breaks previous EX_TYPE_UACCESS handling when posion found in get_user() or copy_from_user().
- For instr case: user process is killed by a SIGBUS signal due to #CMCI and #MCE race
When an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the CMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA signature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when the data is about to be consumed.
Background: why UNcorrected errors tied to CMCI in Intel platform 1
Prior to Icelake memory controllers reported patrol scrub events that detected a previously unseen uncorrected error in memory by signaling a broadcast machine check with an SRAO (Software Recoverable Action Optional) signature in the machine check bank. This was overkill because it's not an urgent problem that no core is on the verge of consuming that bad data. It's also found that multi SRAO UCE may cause nested MCE interrupts and finally become an IERR.
Hence, Intel downgrades the machine check bank signature of patrol scrub from SRAO to UCNA (Uncorrected, No Action required), and signal changed to
CMCI. Just to add to the confusion, Linux does take an action (in
uc_decode_notifier()) to try to offline the page despite the UCNA signature name.
Background: why #CMCI and #MCE race when poison is consuming in
Intel platform [1]
Having decided that CMCI/UCNA is the best action for patrol scrub errors, the memory controller uses it for reads too. But the memory controller is executing asynchronously from the core, and can't tell the difference between a "real" read and a speculative read. So it will do CMCI/UCNA if an error is found in any read.
Thus:
1) Core is clever and thinks address A is needed soon, issues a speculative read.
2) Core finds it is going to use address A soon after sending the read request
3) The CMCI from the memory controller is in a race with MCE from the core that will soon try to retire the load from address A.
Quite often (because speculation has got better) the CMCI from the memory controller is delivered before the core is committed to the instruction reading address A, so the interrupt is taken, and Linux offlines the page (marking it as poison).
Why user process is killed for instr case
Commit 046545a661af ("mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported "not ---truncated---(CVE-2025-39989)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-113.0.0.117.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ravb: Fix missing rtnl lock in suspend/resume path\n\nFix the suspend/resume path by ensuring the rtnl lock is held where\nrequired. Calls to ravb_open, ravb_close and wol operations must be\nperformed under the rtnl lock to prevent conflicts with ongoing ndo\noperations.\n\nWithout this fix, the following warning is triggered:\n[ 39.032969] =============================\n[ 39.032983] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n[ 39.033019] -----------------------------\n[ 39.033033] drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:2004 suspicious\nrcu_dereference_protected() usage!\n...\n[ 39.033597] stack backtrace:\n[ 39.033613] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 174 Comm: python3 Not tainted\n6.13.0-rc7-next-20250116-arm64-renesas-00002-g35245dfdc62c #7\n[ 39.033623] Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on\nr9a08g045s33 (DT)\n[ 39.033628] Call trace:\n[ 39.033633] show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C)\n[ 39.033652] dump_stack_lvl+0xb4/0xc4\n[ 39.033664] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c\n[ 39.033671] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x16c/0x22c\n[ 39.033682] phy_detach+0x160/0x190\n[ 39.033694] phy_disconnect+0x40/0x54\n[ 39.033703] ravb_close+0x6c/0x1cc\n[ 39.033714] ravb_suspend+0x48/0x120\n[ 39.033721] dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x14c\n[ 39.033731] device_suspend+0x11c/0x4dc\n[ 39.033740] dpm_suspend+0xdc/0x214\n[ 39.033748] dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x60\n[ 39.033758] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x124/0x574\n[ 39.033769] pm_suspend+0x1ac/0x274\n[ 39.033778] state_store+0x88/0x124\n[ 39.033788] kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24\n[ 39.033798] sysfs_kf_write+0x48/0x6c\n[ 39.033808] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1a8\n[ 39.033817] vfs_write+0x27c/0x378\n[ 39.033825] ksys_write+0x64/0xf4\n[ 39.033833] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20\n[ 39.033841] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104\n[ 39.033852] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4\n[ 39.033862] do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20\n[ 39.033870] el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0\n[ 39.033880] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4\n[ 39.033888] el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158\n[ 39.041274] ravb 11c30000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down(CVE-2025-21801)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: renesas_usbhs: Flush the notify_hotplug_work\n\nWhen performing continuous unbind/bind operations on the USB drivers\navailable on the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC, a kernel crash with the message\n\u0026quot;Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address\u0026quot;\nmay occur. This issue points to the usbhsc_notify_hotplug() function.\n\nFlush the delayed work to avoid its execution when driver resources are\nunavailable.(CVE-2025-21917)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: btrtl: Prevent potential NULL dereference\n\nThe btrtl_initialize() function checks that rtl_load_file() either\nhad an error or it loaded a zero length file. However, if it loaded\na zero length file then the error code is not set correctly. It\nresults in an error pointer vs NULL bug, followed by a NULL pointer\ndereference. This was detected by Smatch:\n\ndrivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c:592 btrtl_initialize() warn: passing zero to \u0026apos;ERR_PTR\u0026apos;(CVE-2025-37792)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: ets: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of ets, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether\nthe class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before\ndoing the addition to cater for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37914)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: adjust subpage bit start based on sectorsize\n\nWhen running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started\nseeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because\nwe were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects\nall metadata writes.\n\nWhen writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty\nrange. If the range isn\u0026apos;t dirty we do\n\n\tbit_start++;\n\nto move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the\nnumber of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k\npagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4\nbits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per\npage.\n\nTo make this easier this is how everything looks\n\n[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address\n[0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset\n[ 64k page ] folio\n[ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers\n[ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap\n\nNow we use all of our addressing based on fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize_bits, so\nas you can see the above our 16k eb-\u0026gt;start turns into radix entry 4.\n\nWhen we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start +=\nsectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the\nnext eb is 4, to correspond to eb-\u0026gt;start 16k.\n\nHowever if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now\nput us offset from our radix tree entries.\n\nIn our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is\nnot dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop\naround and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that\nstart using the following equation\n\n\tstart = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize;\n\nso in the case above, eb-\u0026gt;start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start\nas\n\n\t0 + 1 * fs_info-\u0026gt;sectorsize = 4096\n\t4096 \u0026gt;\u0026gt; 12 = 1\n\nNow we\u0026apos;re looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won\u0026apos;t find an eb.\nWhat\u0026apos;s worse is now we\u0026apos;re using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start +=\nsectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into\nthe same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the\nradix tree, and now we\u0026apos;re skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.\n\nThe best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes,\nbut that\u0026apos;s a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix\nit simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.(CVE-2025-37931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev\n\nThe blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but,\nin the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable.\n\nIn case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the\nmc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this\ncircumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed.\n\nThis commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a\nfalse-positive.\n\nWARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required\n+ if (mc_bus)\n+ kfree(mc_bus);(CVE-2025-38313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to bail out in get_new_segment()\n\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 579 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2832 new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\npc : new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\nCall trace:\n new_curseg+0x5e8/0x6dc\n f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xa54/0xe28\n do_write_page+0x6c/0x194\n f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x38/0x78\n __write_node_page+0x248/0x6d4\n f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x524/0x72c\n f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x4bc/0x9b0\n __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0x80/0x244\n issue_checkpoint_thread+0x8c/0xec\n kthread+0x114/0x1bc\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n\nget_new_segment() detects inconsistent status in between free_segmap\nand free_secmap, let\u0026apos;s record such error into super block, and bail\nout get_new_segment() instead of continue using the segment.(CVE-2025-38333)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850\n\nGCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST is wrongly defined for WCN7850, causing kernel crash\non some specific platforms.\n\nSince this register is divergent for WCN7850 and QCN9274, move it to\nregister table to allow different definitions. Then correct the register\naddress for WCN7850 to fix this issue.\n\nNote IPQ5332 is not affected as it is not PCIe based device.\n\nTested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3(CVE-2025-38414)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/ntfs3: cancle set bad inode after removing name fails\n\nThe reproducer uses a file0 on a ntfs3 file system with a corrupted i_link.\nWhen renaming, the file0\u0026apos;s inode is marked as a bad inode because the file\nname cannot be deleted.\n\nThe underlying bug is that make_bad_inode() is called on a live inode.\nIn some cases it\u0026apos;s \u0026quot;icache lookup finds a normal inode, d_splice_alias()\nis called to attach it to dentry, while another thread decides to call\nmake_bad_inode() on it - that would evict it from icache, but we\u0026apos;d already\nfound it there earlier\u0026quot;.\nIn some it\u0026apos;s outright \u0026quot;we have an inode attached to dentry - that\u0026apos;s how we\ngot it in the first place; let\u0026apos;s call make_bad_inode() on it just for shits\nand giggles\u0026quot;.(CVE-2025-38615)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: libiscsi: Initialize iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data only if memory is allocated\n\nIn case of an ib_fast_reg_mr allocation failure during iSER setup, the\nmachine hits a panic because iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data is initialized\nunconditionally, even when no memory is allocated (dd_size == 0). This\nleads invalid pointer dereference during connection teardown.\n\nFix by setting iscsi_conn-\u0026gt;dd_data only if memory is actually allocated.\n\nPanic trace:\n------------\n iser: iser_create_fastreg_desc: Failed to allocate ib_fast_reg_mr err=-12\n iser: iser_alloc_rx_descriptors: failed allocating rx descriptors / data buffers\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8\n RIP: 0010:swake_up_locked.part.5+0xa/0x40\n Call Trace:\n complete+0x31/0x40\n iscsi_iser_conn_stop+0x88/0xb0 [ib_iser]\n iscsi_stop_conn+0x66/0xc0 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n iscsi_if_stop_conn+0x14a/0x150 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n iscsi_if_rx+0x1135/0x1834 [scsi_transport_iscsi]\n ? netlink_lookup+0x12f/0x1b0\n ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x2c/0x200\n netlink_unicast+0x1ab/0x280\n netlink_sendmsg+0x257/0x4f0\n ? _copy_from_user+0x29/0x60\n sock_sendmsg+0x5f/0x70(CVE-2025-38700)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: do not BUG when INLINE_DATA_FL lacks system.data xattr\n\nA syzbot fuzzed image triggered a BUG_ON in ext4_update_inline_data()\nwhen an inode had the INLINE_DATA_FL flag set but was missing the\nsystem.data extended attribute.\n\nSince this can happen due to a maiciouly fuzzed file system, we\nshouldn\u0026apos;t BUG, but rather, report it as a corrupted file system.\n\nAdd similar replacements of BUG_ON with EXT4_ERROR_INODE() ii\next4_create_inline_data() and ext4_inline_data_truncate().(CVE-2025-38701)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nloop: Avoid updating block size under exclusive owner\n\nSyzbot came up with a reproducer where a loop device block size is\nchanged underneath a mounted filesystem. This causes a mismatch between\nthe block device block size and the block size stored in the superblock\ncausing confusion in various places such as fs/buffer.c. The particular\nissue triggered by syzbot was a warning in __getblk_slow() due to\nrequested buffer size not matching block device block size.\n\nFix the problem by getting exclusive hold of the loop device to change\nits block size. This fails if somebody (such as filesystem) has already\nan exclusive ownership of the block device and thus prevents modifying\nthe loop device under some exclusive owner which doesn\u0026apos;t expect it.(CVE-2025-38709)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110\nRead of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0\nCPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390\n print_report+0xb4/0x270\n kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0\n end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110\n end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80\n blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720\n scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0\n scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480\n ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160\n blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90\n handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370\n irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n\n Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens\n as follows:\n mount IRQ\nntfs_fill_super\n read_cache_page\n do_read_cache_folio\n filemap_read_folio\n mpage_read_folio\n\t do_mpage_readpage\n\t ntfs_get_block_vbo\n\t bh_read\n\t submit_bh\n\t wait_on_buffer(bh);\n\t blk_complete_reqs\n\t\t\t\t scsi_io_completion\n\t\t\t\t scsi_end_request\n\t\t\t\t blk_update_request\n\t\t\t\t end_bio_bh_io_sync\n\t\t\t\t\t end_buffer_read_sync\n\t\t\t\t\t __end_buffer_read_notouch\n\t\t\t\t\t unlock_buffer\n\n wait_on_buffer(bh);--\u0026gt; return will return to caller\n\n\t\t\t\t\t put_bh\n\t\t\t\t\t --\u0026gt; trigger stack-out-of-bounds\nIn the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable \u0026apos;map_bh\u0026apos; is\npassed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and\nwait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable\nis likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync()\nprocess, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.\n\nIf the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing\na buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which\nwill fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call\nput_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().(CVE-2025-39691)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don\u0026apos;t read past the ELF header\n\nWhen the MDT loader is used in remoteproc, the ELF header is sanitized\nbeforehand, but that\u0026apos;s not necessary the case for other clients.\n\nValidate the size of the firmware buffer to ensure that we don\u0026apos;t read\npast the end as we iterate over the header. e_phentsize and e_shentsize\nare validated as well, to ensure that the assumptions about step size in\nthe traversal are valid.(CVE-2025-39787)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nblock: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits()\n\nIn blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t-\u0026gt;chunk_sectors value is a\nmultiple of the t-\u0026gt;physical_block_size value.\n\nHowever, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow\nthe unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be\nbased on sectors.(CVE-2025-39795)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npcmcia: Add error handling for add_interval() in do_validate_mem()\n\nIn the do_validate_mem(), the call to add_interval() does not\nhandle errors. If kmalloc() fails in add_interval(), it could\nresult in a null pointer being inserted into the linked list,\nleading to illegal memory access when sub_interval() is called\nnext.\n\nThis patch adds an error handling for the add_interval(). If\nadd_interval() returns an error, the function will return early\nwith the error code.(CVE-2025-39920)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees\n\nWhen we don\u0026apos;t have a clock specified in the device tree, we have no way to\nensure the BAM is on. This is often the case for remotely-controlled or\nremotely-powered BAM instances. In this case, we need to read num-channels\nfrom the DT to have all the necessary information to complete probing.\n\nHowever, at the moment invalid device trees without clock and without\nnum-channels still continue probing, because the error handling is missing\nreturn statements. The driver will then later try to read the number of\nchannels from the registers. This is unsafe, because it relies on boot\nfirmware and lucky timing to succeed. Unfortunately, the lack of proper\nerror handling here has been abused for several Qualcomm SoCs upstream,\ncausing early boot crashes in several situations [1, 2].\n\nAvoid these early crashes by erroring out when any of the required DT\nproperties are missing. Note that this will break some of the existing DTs\nupstream (mainly BAM instances related to the crypto engine). However,\nclearly these DTs have never been tested properly, since the error in the\nkernel log was just ignored. It\u0026apos;s safer to disable the crypto engine for\nthese broken DTBs.\n\n[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-39923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel i40e driver, there is a security vulnerability: the driver lacks boundary checks for the maximum number of virtual function (VF) filters. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to request filter counts beyond the boundaries, leading to potential security issues.(CVE-2025-39968)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mce: use is_copy_from_user() to determine copy-from-user context\n\nPatch series \u0026quot;mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling\u0026quot;,\nv4.\n\n## 1. What am I trying to do:\n\nThis patchset resolves two critical regressions related to memory failure\nhandling that have appeared in the upstream kernel since version 5.17, as\ncompared to 5.10 LTS.\n\n - copyin case: poison found in user page while kernel copying from user space\n - instr case: poison found while instruction fetching in user space\n\n## 2. What is the expected outcome and why\n\n- For copyin case:\n\nKernel can recover from poison found where kernel is doing get_user() or\ncopy_from_user() if those places get an error return and the kernel return\n-EFAULT to the process instead of crashing. More specifily, MCE handler\nchecks the fixup handler type to decide whether an in kernel #MC can be\nrecovered. When EX_TYPE_UACCESS is found, the PC jumps to recovery code\nspecified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() and return a -EFAULT to user space.\n\n- For instr case:\n\nIf a poison found while instruction fetching in user space, full recovery\nis possible. User process takes #PF, Linux allocates a new page and fills\nby reading from storage.\n\n\n## 3. What actually happens and why\n\n- For copyin case: kernel panic since v5.17\n\nCommit 4c132d1d844a (\u0026quot;x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage\u0026quot;) introduced a new\nextable fixup type, EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG, and later patches updated the\nextable fixup type for copy-from-user operations, changing it from\nEX_TYPE_UACCESS to EX_TYPE_EFAULT_REG. It breaks previous EX_TYPE_UACCESS\nhandling when posion found in get_user() or copy_from_user().\n\n- For instr case: user process is killed by a SIGBUS signal due to #CMCI\n and #MCE race\n\nWhen an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the\nCMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA\nsignature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when\nthe data is about to be consumed.\n\n### Background: why *UN*corrected errors tied to *C*MCI in Intel platform [1]\n\nPrior to Icelake memory controllers reported patrol scrub events that\ndetected a previously unseen uncorrected error in memory by signaling a\nbroadcast machine check with an SRAO (Software Recoverable Action\nOptional) signature in the machine check bank. This was overkill because\nit\u0026apos;s not an urgent problem that no core is on the verge of consuming that\nbad data. It\u0026apos;s also found that multi SRAO UCE may cause nested MCE\ninterrupts and finally become an IERR.\n\nHence, Intel downgrades the machine check bank signature of patrol scrub\nfrom SRAO to UCNA (Uncorrected, No Action required), and signal changed to\n#CMCI. Just to add to the confusion, Linux does take an action (in\nuc_decode_notifier()) to try to offline the page despite the UC*NA*\nsignature name.\n\n### Background: why #CMCI and #MCE race when poison is consuming in\n Intel platform [1]\n\nHaving decided that CMCI/UCNA is the best action for patrol scrub errors,\nthe memory controller uses it for reads too. But the memory controller is\nexecuting asynchronously from the core, and can\u0026apos;t tell the difference\nbetween a \u0026quot;real\u0026quot; read and a speculative read. So it will do CMCI/UCNA if\nan error is found in any read.\n\nThus:\n\n1) Core is clever and thinks address A is needed soon, issues a\n speculative read.\n\n2) Core finds it is going to use address A soon after sending the read\n request\n\n3) The CMCI from the memory controller is in a race with MCE from the\n core that will soon try to retire the load from address A.\n\nQuite often (because speculation has got better) the CMCI from the memory\ncontroller is delivered before the core is committed to the instruction\nreading address A, so the interrupt is taken, and Linux offlines the page\n(marking it as poison).\n\n\n## Why user process is killed for instr case\n\nCommit 046545a661af (\u0026quot;mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported\n\u0026quot;not\n---truncated---(CVE-2025-39989)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2537",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:37Z",
"published": "2025-10-24T11:09:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2537"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37792"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37914"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38414"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38700"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38701"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39691"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39787"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39989"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-21801",
"CVE-2025-21917",
"CVE-2025-37792",
"CVE-2025-37914",
"CVE-2025-37931",
"CVE-2025-38313",
"CVE-2025-38333",
"CVE-2025-38414",
"CVE-2025-38615",
"CVE-2025-38700",
"CVE-2025-38701",
"CVE-2025-38709",
"CVE-2025-39691",
"CVE-2025-39787",
"CVE-2025-39795",
"CVE-2025-39920",
"CVE-2025-39923",
"CVE-2025-39968",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39989"
]
}
OESA-2025-2554 (CVE-2022-50306)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-31 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()
For scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain space less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read when mounting corrupt file system image. ADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this three tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn't less than data length which will read.(CVE-2022-50306)
A use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel s netfilter: nf_tables component can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation.Due to a race condition between nf_tables netlink control plane transaction and nft_set element garbage collection, it is possible to underflow the reference counter causing a use-after-free vulnerability.We recommend upgrading past commit 3e91b0ebd994635df2346353322ac51ce84ce6d8.(CVE-2023-4244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: multitouch: Correct devm device reference for hidinput input_dev name
Reference the HID device rather than the input device for the devm allocation of the input_dev name. Referencing the input_dev would lead to a use-after-free when the input_dev was unregistered and subsequently fires a uevent that depends on the name. At the point of firing the uevent, the name would be freed by devres management.
Use devm_kasprintf to simplify the logic for allocating memory and formatting the input_dev name string.(CVE-2023-53454)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition
System crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause of the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue up twice. Here's the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to double queue for deletion on different cpu.
20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1
Move the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.(CVE-2023-53615)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ses: Fix possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses
Sanitize possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses in ses_enclosure_data_process().(CVE-2023-53675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFS: Fix a potential data corruption
We must ensure that the subrequests are joined back into the head before we can retransmit a request. If the head was not on the commit lists, because the server wrote it synchronously, we still need to add it back to the retransmission list. Add a call that mirrors the effect of nfs_cancel_remove_inode() for O_DIRECT.(CVE-2023-53711)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: raid1: fix potential OOB in raid1_remove_disk(). If rddev->raid_disk is greater than mddev->raid_disks, there will be an out-of-bounds in raid1_remove_disk(). We have already found similar reports as follows: 1) commit d17f744e883b ("md-raid10: fix KASAN warning") 2) commit 1ebc2cec0b7d ("dm raid: fix KASAN warning in raid5_remove_disk"). Fix this bug by checking whether the "number" variable is valid.(CVE-2023-53722)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig->posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig->posix_timer_id < 0) start = sig->posix_timer_id; sig->posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig->posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk->rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 </TASK>Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device->pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field &msg->msg[msg->curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 drm_display_helper
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st->ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st->ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st->ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link->downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.kwilczynski: commit log
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers.
Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected:
int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
SEC("tc")
int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
... make p valid ...
tail_call(sk);
*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
...
}
The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling
When unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each ae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at the time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause oops.
But we can't simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the process flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow of VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.
To fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg
sctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by doing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination address, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in all the message chunks to be sent.
There's a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal of that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an address with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have been set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send buffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily releases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().
This causes the access to the transport data in sctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed, to result in a use-after-free read.
This change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal the freeing of the transport, tagging it as "dead". In order to do this, the patch restores the "dead" bit in struct sctp_transport, which was removed in commit 47faa1e4c50e ("sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport").
Then, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after re-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while holding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in the process.
If the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished, sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the send.
The bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1] and the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too
Similarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue() too. But for this one, we don't have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report [1], there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of drr, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding to the list to cover for the reentrant case.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during ->change()
Previously, when reducing a qdisc's limit via the ->change() operation, only the main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb list. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check sch->limit against sch->q.qlen.
This patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures both the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming excess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie) are updated to use this helper in their ->change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()
Lei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check the return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could race with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That could later lead to a UAF.
Fix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an extant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no confirmed client found at all.
In the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and return the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer "buf" without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-287.0.0.189.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()\n\nFor scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain\nspace less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read\nwhen mounting corrupt file system image.\nADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this\nthree tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn\u0026apos;t less than data length\nwhich will read.(CVE-2022-50306)\n\nA use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel s netfilter: nf_tables component can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation.Due to a race condition between nf_tables netlink control plane transaction and nft_set element garbage collection, it is possible to underflow the reference counter causing a use-after-free vulnerability.We recommend upgrading past commit 3e91b0ebd994635df2346353322ac51ce84ce6d8.(CVE-2023-4244)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: multitouch: Correct devm device reference for hidinput input_dev name\n\nReference the HID device rather than the input device for the devm\nallocation of the input_dev name. Referencing the input_dev would lead to a\nuse-after-free when the input_dev was unregistered and subsequently fires a\nuevent that depends on the name. At the point of firing the uevent, the\nname would be freed by devres management.\n\nUse devm_kasprintf to simplify the logic for allocating memory and\nformatting the input_dev name string.(CVE-2023-53454)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition\n\nSystem crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause\nof the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue\nup twice. Here\u0026apos;s the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to\ndouble queue for deletion on different cpu.\n\n20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1\n20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1\n\nMove the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.(CVE-2023-53615)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ses: Fix possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses\n\nSanitize possible desc_ptr out-of-bounds accesses in\nses_enclosure_data_process().(CVE-2023-53675)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFS: Fix a potential data corruption\n\nWe must ensure that the subrequests are joined back into the head before we can retransmit a request. If the head was not on the commit lists, because the server wrote it synchronously, we still need to add it back to the retransmission list.\nAdd a call that mirrors the effect of nfs_cancel_remove_inode() for O_DIRECT.(CVE-2023-53711)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: raid1: fix potential OOB in raid1_remove_disk(). If rddev-\u0026gt;raid_disk is greater than mddev-\u0026gt;raid_disks, there will be an out-of-bounds in raid1_remove_disk(). We have already found similar reports as follows: 1) commit d17f744e883b (\u0026quot;md-raid10: fix KASAN warning\u0026quot;) 2) commit 1ebc2cec0b7d (\u0026quot;dm raid: fix KASAN warning in raid5_remove_disk\u0026quot;). Fix this bug by checking whether the \u0026quot;number\u0026quot; variable is valid.(CVE-2023-53722)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id \u0026lt; 0) start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk-\u0026gt;rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.[pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo](CVE-2024-50210)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 \u0026lt;fa\u0026gt; c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device-\u0026gt;pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field \u0026amp;msg-\u0026gt;msg[msg-\u0026gt;curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper](CVE-2024-56616)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st-\u0026gt;ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st-\u0026gt;ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st-\u0026gt;ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers\n\nTail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate\npacket pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call\ninvalidates packet pointers.\n\nMaking the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes\nuse of check_cfg() logic that computes \u0026apos;changes_pkt_data\u0026apos; effect for\nglobal sub-programs, such that the following program could be\nrejected:\n\n int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tbpf_tail_call_static(sk, \u0026amp;jmp_table, 0);\n \treturn 0;\n }\n\n SEC(\u0026quot;tc\u0026quot;)\n int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tint *p = (void *)(long)sk-\u0026gt;data;\n \t... make p valid ...\n \ttail_call(sk);\n \t*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */\n \t...\n }\n\nThe tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that\ncan invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can\u0026apos;t be freplaced with\ntailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling\n\nWhen unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each\nae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at\nthe time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause\noops.\n\nBut we can\u0026apos;t simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the\nprocess flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow\nof VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.\n\nTo fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg\n\nsctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by\ndoing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination\naddress, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in\nall the message chunks to be sent.\n\nThere\u0026apos;s a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal\nof that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an\naddress with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have\nbeen set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send\nbuffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily\nreleases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().\n\nThis causes the access to the transport data in\nsctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed,\nto result in a use-after-free read.\n\nThis change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal\nthe freeing of the transport, tagging it as \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot;. In order to do this,\nthe patch restores the \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot; bit in struct sctp_transport, which was\nremoved in\ncommit 47faa1e4c50e (\u0026quot;sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport\u0026quot;).\n\nThen, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket\nlock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after\nre-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while\nholding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in\nthe process.\n\nIf the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished,\nsctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the\nsend.\n\nThe bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1]\nand the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too\n\nSimilarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue()\ntoo. But for this one, we don\u0026apos;t have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of drr, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the\nclass was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding\nto the list to cover for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during -\u0026gt;change()\n\nPreviously, when reducing a qdisc\u0026apos;s limit via the -\u0026gt;change() operation, only\nthe main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb\nlist. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check\nsch-\u0026gt;limit against sch-\u0026gt;q.qlen.\n\nThis patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures\nboth the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming\nexcess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie)\nare updated to use this helper in their -\u0026gt;change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()\n\nLei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check\nthe return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could\nrace with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That\ncould later lead to a UAF.\n\nFix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an\nextant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no\nconfirmed client found at all.\n\nIn the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and\nreturn the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)\n\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer \u0026quot;buf\u0026quot; without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2554",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:38Z",
"published": "2025-10-31T11:09:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2554"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53454"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53615"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53711"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53722"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53728"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37992"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38724"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39998"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-50306",
"CVE-2023-4244",
"CVE-2023-53454",
"CVE-2023-53615",
"CVE-2023-53675",
"CVE-2023-53711",
"CVE-2023-53722",
"CVE-2023-53728",
"CVE-2024-50210",
"CVE-2024-53168",
"CVE-2024-53214",
"CVE-2024-56602",
"CVE-2024-56616",
"CVE-2024-57904",
"CVE-2024-57906",
"CVE-2024-57931",
"CVE-2024-58052",
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58237",
"CVE-2025-21665",
"CVE-2025-21772",
"CVE-2025-21802",
"CVE-2025-23142",
"CVE-2025-37823",
"CVE-2025-37915",
"CVE-2025-37992",
"CVE-2025-38724",
"CVE-2025-39898",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39998"
]
}
OESA-2025-2555 (CVE-2022-50306)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-10-31 11:09 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:09 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()
For scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain space less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read when mounting corrupt file system image. ADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this three tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn't less than data length which will read.(CVE-2022-50306)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig->posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig->posix_timer_id < 0) start = sig->posix_timer_id; sig->posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig->posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk->rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 </TASK>Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device->pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field &msg->msg[msg->curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 drm_display_helper
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st->ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st->ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st->ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link->downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.kwilczynski: commit log
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers.
Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected:
int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
SEC("tc")
int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
... make p valid ...
tail_call(sk);
*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
...
}
The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling
When unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each ae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at the time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause oops.
But we can't simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the process flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow of VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.
To fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg
sctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by doing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination address, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in all the message chunks to be sent.
There's a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal of that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an address with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have been set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send buffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily releases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().
This causes the access to the transport data in sctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed, to result in a use-after-free read.
This change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal the freeing of the transport, tagging it as "dead". In order to do this, the patch restores the "dead" bit in struct sctp_transport, which was removed in commit 47faa1e4c50e ("sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport").
Then, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after re-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while holding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in the process.
If the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished, sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the send.
The bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1] and the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too
Similarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue() too. But for this one, we don't have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
As described in Gerrard's report [1], there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of drr, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.
In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding to the list to cover for the reentrant case.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during ->change()
Previously, when reducing a qdisc's limit via the ->change() operation, only the main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb list. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check sch->limit against sch->q.qlen.
This patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures both the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming excess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie) are updated to use this helper in their ->change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()
Lei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check the return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could race with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That could later lead to a UAF.
Fix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an extant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no confirmed client found at all.
In the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and return the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf->ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)
In the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer "buf" without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-287.0.0.190.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix potential out of bound read in ext4_fc_replay_scan()\n\nFor scan loop must ensure that at least EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN space. If remain\nspace less than EXT4_FC_TAG_BASE_LEN which will lead to out of bound read\nwhen mounting corrupt file system image.\nADD_RANGE/HEAD/TAIL is needed to add extra check when do journal scan, as this\nthree tags will read data during scan, tag length couldn\u0026apos;t less than data length\nwhich will read.(CVE-2022-50306)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is validposix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from thecached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation.This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one byone. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to thestarting point.But that s racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read outlockless, which leads to the following problem:CPU0 CPU1posix_timer_add() start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id \u0026lt; 0) start = sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id; sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id = 0;So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop breaknever happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig-\u0026gt;posix_timer_id == start) break;While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space ishuge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention ofKCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness.Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.(CVE-2023-53728)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid s fd,and get the clk-\u0026gt;rwsem read lock, so the error path should releasethe lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid s fd to makethe refcount balance and release the fd related resource.However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting inunbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() beforeget_clock_desc() to fix it, because the ts is not changedafter that.[pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo](CVE-2024-50210)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socketBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0Read of size 1 at addr ffff888111f322cd by task swapper/0/0CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-dirty #7Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1Call Trace: \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3d0 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xbd/0xf0 tcp_write_timer_handler+0x156/0x3e0 tcp_write_timer+0x66/0x170 call_timer_fn+0xfb/0x1d0 __run_timers+0x3f8/0x480 run_timer_softirq+0x9b/0x100 handle_softirqs+0x153/0x390 __irq_exit_rcu+0x103/0x120 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90 \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20Code: 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 72 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 66 90 0f 00 2d 33 f8 25 00 fb f4 \u0026lt;fa\u0026gt; c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90RSP: 0018:ffffffffa2007e28 EFLAGS: 00000242RAX: 00000000000f3b31 RBX: 1ffffffff4400fc7 RCX: ffffffffa09c3196RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff9f00590fRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed102360835dR10: ffff88811b041aeb R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000R13: ffffffffa202d7c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000147d0 default_idle_call+0x6b/0xa0 cpuidle_idle_call+0x1af/0x1f0 do_idle+0xbc/0x130 cpu_startup_entry+0x33/0x40 rest_init+0x11f/0x210 start_kernel+0x39a/0x420 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x97/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;Allocated by task 595: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x87/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x12b/0x3f0 copy_net_ns+0x94/0x380 create_new_namespaces+0x24c/0x500 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x75/0xf0 ksys_unshare+0x24e/0x4f0 __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x70/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7eFreed by task 100: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x54/0x70 kmem_cache_free+0x156/0x5d0 cleanup_net+0x5d3/0x670 process_one_work+0x776/0xa90 worker_thread+0x2e2/0x560 kthread+0x1a8/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30Reproduction script:mkdir -p /mnt/nfssharemkdir -p /mnt/nfs/netns_1mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdbmount /dev/sdb /mnt/nfssharesystemctl restart nfs-serverchmod 777 /mnt/nfsshareexportfs -i -o rw,no_root_squash *:/mnt/nfsshareip netns add netns_1ip link add name veth_1_peer type veth peer veth_1ifconfig veth_1_peer 11.11.0.254 upip link set veth_1 netns netns_1ip netns exec netns_1 ifconfig veth_1 11.11.0.1ip netns exec netns_1 /root/iptables -A OUTPUT -d 11.11.0.254 -p tcp --tcp-flags FIN FIN -j DROP(note: In my environment, a DESTROY_CLIENTID operation is always sent immediately, breaking the nfs tcp connection.)ip netns exec netns_1 timeout -s 9 300 mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=4.1 11.11.0.254:/mnt/nfsshare /mnt/nfs/netns_1ip netns del netns_1The reason here is that the tcp socket in netns_1 (nfs side) has beenshutdown and closed (done in xs_destroy), but the FIN message (with ack)is discarded, and the nfsd side keeps sending retransmission messages.As a result, when the tcp sock in netns_1 processes the received message,it sends the message (FIN message) in the sending queue, and the tcp timeris re-established. When the network namespace is deleted, the net structureaccessed by tcp s timer handler function causes problems.To fix this problem, let s hold netns refcnt for the tcp kernel socket asdone in other modules. This is an ugly hack which can easily be backportedto earlier kernels. A proper fix which cleans up the interfaces willfollow, but may not be so easy to backport.(CVE-2024-53168)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capabilityThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden fromthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with IDgreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionallychosen to be hidden from the user.Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the NextCapability Offset field of the previous capability so it points to thecapability after the one that should be hidden.The special case where the first capability in the list should be hiddenis handled differently because there is no previous capability that canbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroedwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability andleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not doneproperly if the capability is unknown, as structvfio_pci_core_device-\u0026gt;pci_config_map is set to the capability ID duringinitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later whenused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] andto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greaterthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for directread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id canexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, whichare already checked before).[1]WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1(snip)Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2024-53214)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: ieee802154: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in ieee802154_create()sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sockobject. If ieee802154_create() fails later, the allocated sk object isfreed, but the dangling pointer remains in the provided sock object, whichmay allow use-after-free.Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56602)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length checkFix the MST sideband message body length check, which must be at least 1byte accounting for the message body CRC (aka message data CRC) at theend of the message.This fixes a case where an MST branch device returns a header with acorrect header CRC (indicating a correctly received body length), withthe body length being incorrectly set to 0. This will later lead to amemory corruption in drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() and the followingerrors in dmesg: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:786:25 index -1 is out of range for type u8 [48] Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x33d/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 18446744073709551615) of single field \u0026amp;msg-\u0026gt;msg[msg-\u0026gt;curlen] at drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:791 (size 256) Call Trace: drm_dp_sideband_append_payload+0x324/0x350 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_get_one_sb_msg+0x3ce/0x5f0 [drm_display_helper] drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_handle_event+0xc8/0x1580 [drm_display_helper](CVE-2024-56616)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: at91: call input_free_device() on allocated iio_devCurrent implementation of at91_ts_register() calls input_free_deivce()on st-\u0026gt;ts_input, however, the err label can be reached before theallocated iio_dev is stored to st-\u0026gt;ts_input. Thus callinput_free_device() on input instead of st-\u0026gt;ts_input.(CVE-2024-57904)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:iio: adc: ti-ads8688: fix information leak in triggered bufferThe buffer local array is used to push data to user space from atriggered buffer, but it does not set values for inactive channels, asit only uses iio_for_each_active_channel() to assign new values.Initialize the array to zero before using it to avoid pushinguninitialized information to userspace.(CVE-2024-57906)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:selinux: ignore unknown extended permissionsWhen evaluating extended permissions, ignore unknown permissions insteadof calling BUG(). This commit ensures that future permissions can beadded without interfering with older kernels.(CVE-2024-57931)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:drm/amdgpu: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_tableThe function atomctrl_get_smc_sclk_range_table() does not check the returnvalue of smu_atom_get_data_table(). If smu_atom_get_data_table() fails toretrieve SMU_Info table, it returns NULL which is later dereferenced.Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.In practice this should never happen as this code only gets calledon polaris chips and the vbios data table will always be present onthose chips.(CVE-2024-58052)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers\n\nTail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate\npacket pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call\ninvalidates packet pointers.\n\nMaking the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes\nuse of check_cfg() logic that computes \u0026apos;changes_pkt_data\u0026apos; effect for\nglobal sub-programs, such that the following program could be\nrejected:\n\n int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tbpf_tail_call_static(sk, \u0026amp;jmp_table, 0);\n \treturn 0;\n }\n\n SEC(\u0026quot;tc\u0026quot;)\n int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)\n {\n \tint *p = (void *)(long)sk-\u0026gt;data;\n \t... make p valid ...\n \ttail_call(sk);\n \t*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */\n \t...\n }\n\nThe tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that\ncan invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can\u0026apos;t be freplaced with\ntailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bitsOn 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writingto an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21665)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:partitions: mac: fix handling of bogus partition tableFix several issues in partition probing: - The bailout for a bad partoffset must use put_dev_sector(), since the preceding read_part_sector() succeeded. - If the partition table claims a silly sector size like 0xfff bytes (which results in partition table entries straddling sector boundaries), bail out instead of accessing out-of-bounds memory. - We must not assume that the partition table contains proper NUL termination - use strnlen() and strncmp() instead of strlen() and strcmp().(CVE-2025-21772)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hns3: fix oops when unload drivers paralleling\n\nWhen unload hclge driver, it tries to disable sriov first for each\nae_dev node from hnae3_ae_dev_list. If user unloads hns3 driver at\nthe time, because it removes all the ae_dev nodes, and it may cause\noops.\n\nBut we can\u0026apos;t simply use hnae3_common_lock for this. Because in the\nprocess flow of pci_disable_sriov(), it will trigger the remove flow\nof VF, which will also take hnae3_common_lock.\n\nTo fixes it, introduce a new mutex to protect the unload process.(CVE-2025-21802)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: detect and prevent references to a freed transport in sendmsg\n\nsctp_sendmsg() re-uses associations and transports when possible by\ndoing a lookup based on the socket endpoint and the message destination\naddress, and then sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() sets the selected transport in\nall the message chunks to be sent.\n\nThere\u0026apos;s a possible race condition if another thread triggers the removal\nof that selected transport, for instance, by explicitly unbinding an\naddress with setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_REM), after the chunks have\nbeen set up and before the message is sent. This can happen if the send\nbuffer is full, during the period when the sender thread temporarily\nreleases the socket lock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf().\n\nThis causes the access to the transport data in\nsctp_outq_select_transport(), when the association outqueue is flushed,\nto result in a use-after-free read.\n\nThis change avoids this scenario by having sctp_transport_free() signal\nthe freeing of the transport, tagging it as \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot;. In order to do this,\nthe patch restores the \u0026quot;dead\u0026quot; bit in struct sctp_transport, which was\nremoved in\ncommit 47faa1e4c50e (\u0026quot;sctp: remove the dead field of sctp_transport\u0026quot;).\n\nThen, in the scenario where the sender thread has released the socket\nlock in sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(), the bit is checked again after\nre-acquiring the socket lock to detect the deletion. This is done while\nholding a reference to the transport to prevent it from being freed in\nthe process.\n\nIf the transport was deleted while the socket lock was relinquished,\nsctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() will return -EAGAIN to let userspace retry the\nsend.\n\nThe bug was found by a private syzbot instance (see the error report [1]\nand the C reproducer that triggers it [2]).(CVE-2025-23142)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: hfsc: Fix a potential UAF in hfsc_dequeue() too\n\nSimilarly to the previous patch, we need to safe guard hfsc_dequeue()\ntoo. But for this one, we don\u0026apos;t have a reliable reproducer.(CVE-2025-37823)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc\n\nAs described in Gerrard\u0026apos;s report [1], there are use cases where a netem\nchild qdisc will make the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s enqueue callback reentrant.\nIn the case of drr, there won\u0026apos;t be a UAF, but the code will add the same\nclassifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption.\n\nIn addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the\nclass was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before adding\nto the list to cover for the reentrant case.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2025-37915)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet_sched: Flush gso_skb list too during -\u0026gt;change()\n\nPreviously, when reducing a qdisc\u0026apos;s limit via the -\u0026gt;change() operation, only\nthe main skb queue was trimmed, potentially leaving packets in the gso_skb\nlist. This could result in NULL pointer dereference when we only check\nsch-\u0026gt;limit against sch-\u0026gt;q.qlen.\n\nThis patch introduces a new helper, qdisc_dequeue_internal(), which ensures\nboth the gso_skb list and the main queue are properly flushed when trimming\nexcess packets. All relevant qdiscs (codel, fq, fq_codel, fq_pie, hhf, pie)\nare updated to use this helper in their -\u0026gt;change() routines.(CVE-2025-37992)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: handle get_client_locked() failure in nfsd4_setclientid_confirm()\n\nLei Lu recently reported that nfsd4_setclientid_confirm() did not check\nthe return value from get_client_locked(). a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM could\nrace with a confirmed client expiring and fail to get a reference. That\ncould later lead to a UAF.\n\nFix this by getting a reference early in the case where there is an\nextant confirmed client. If that fails then treat it as if there were no\nconfirmed client found at all.\n\nIn the case where the unconfirmed client is expiring, just fail and\nreturn the result from get_client_locked().(CVE-2025-38724)\n\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2025-39898)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg. Ensure idx is within range of active/initialized TCs when iterating over vf-\u0026gt;ch[idx] in i40e_vc_config_queues_msg().(CVE-2025-39971)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the target_lu_gp_members_show function in target_core_configfs.c. The vulnerability arises from the usage of snprintf to write into the buffer \u0026quot;buf\u0026quot; without checking the return value length. When the total formatted string length exceeds LU_GROUP_NAME_BUF (256 bytes), it may cause a buffer overflow. Since snprintf() returns the total number of bytes that would have been written, this value may exceed the buffer length (256 bytes) passed to memcpy(), ultimately causing the memcpy function to report a buffer overflow error. Adding an additional check of the return value of snprintf() can avoid this buffer overflow.(CVE-2025-39998)",
"id": "OESA-2025-2555",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:09:38Z",
"published": "2025-10-31T11:09:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2555"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53728"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37992"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38724"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39998"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-50306",
"CVE-2023-53728",
"CVE-2024-50210",
"CVE-2024-53168",
"CVE-2024-53214",
"CVE-2024-56602",
"CVE-2024-56616",
"CVE-2024-57904",
"CVE-2024-57906",
"CVE-2024-57931",
"CVE-2024-58052",
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58237",
"CVE-2025-21665",
"CVE-2025-21772",
"CVE-2025-21802",
"CVE-2025-23142",
"CVE-2025-37823",
"CVE-2025-37915",
"CVE-2025-37992",
"CVE-2025-38724",
"CVE-2025-39898",
"CVE-2025-39971",
"CVE-2025-39998"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.