CVE-2025-38338 (GCVE-0-2025-38338)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-10 08:15 – Updated: 2026-11-05 21:02| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9 , < 14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243
(git)
Affected: 000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9 , < 5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5 (git) Affected: 000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9 , < 1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420 (git) Affected: 000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9 , < 4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
6.4
Unaffected: 0 , < 6.4 (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.95 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.35 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.15.4 , ≤ 6.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.16 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-38338",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T20:55:00.358504Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T21:02:34.128Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/read.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/read.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.95",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.35",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.95",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.35",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()\n\nSometimes, when a file was read while it was being truncated by\nanother NFS client, the kernel could deadlock because folio_unlock()\nwas called twice, and the second call would XOR back the `PG_locked`\nflag.\n\nMost of the time (depending on the timing of the truncation), nobody\nnotices the problem because folio_unlock() gets called three times,\nwhich flips `PG_locked` back off:\n\n 1. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... nfs_read_add_folio,\n nfs_return_empty_folio\n 2. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... netfs_read_collection,\n netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages\n 3. vfs_read, ... nfs_do_read_folio, nfs_read_add_folio,\n nfs_return_empty_folio\n\nThe problem is that nfs_read_add_folio() is not supposed to unlock the\nfolio if fscache is enabled, and a nfs_netfs_folio_unlock() check is\nmissing in nfs_return_empty_folio().\n\nRarely this leads to a warning in netfs_read_collection():\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n R=0000031c: folio 10 is not locked\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 29 at fs/netfs/read_collect.c:133 netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_read_collection_worker\n RIP: 0010:netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n netfs_read_collection_worker+0x67/0x80\n process_one_work+0x12e/0x2c0\n worker_thread+0x295/0x3a0\n\nMost of the time, however, processes just get stuck forever in\nfolio_wait_bit_common(), waiting for `PG_locked` to disappear, which\nnever happens because nobody is really holding the folio lock."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T21:26:03.883Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9"
}
],
"title": "fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-38338",
"datePublished": "2025-07-10T08:15:09.022Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T04:51:24.005Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T21:02:34.128Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-38338",
"date": "2026-11-08",
"epss": "0.00185",
"percentile": "0.08162"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-18T14:59:45.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2025-38338",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2025-38338",
"initial_release_date": "2025-07-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "2",
"product_status:known_affected": "2",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2025/msrc_cve-2025-38338.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/read.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/read.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.95",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.35",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F17A70D5-5B72-4411-9C16-98EF57D0C931",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.95",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E569FD34-0076-4428-BE17-EECCF867611C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.35",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DFD174C5-1AA2-4671-BDDC-1A9FCC753655",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()\n\nSometimes, when a file was read while it was being truncated by\nanother NFS client, the kernel could deadlock because folio_unlock()\nwas called twice, and the second call would XOR back the `PG_locked`\nflag.\n\nMost of the time (depending on the timing of the truncation), nobody\nnotices the problem because folio_unlock() gets called three times,\nwhich flips `PG_locked` back off:\n\n 1. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... nfs_read_add_folio,\n nfs_return_empty_folio\n 2. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... netfs_read_collection,\n netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages\n 3. vfs_read, ... nfs_do_read_folio, nfs_read_add_folio,\n nfs_return_empty_folio\n\nThe problem is that nfs_read_add_folio() is not supposed to unlock the\nfolio if fscache is enabled, and a nfs_netfs_folio_unlock() check is\nmissing in nfs_return_empty_folio().\n\nRarely this leads to a warning in netfs_read_collection():\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n R=0000031c: folio 10 is not locked\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 29 at fs/netfs/read_collect.c:133 netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_read_collection_worker\n RIP: 0010:netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n netfs_read_collection_worker+0x67/0x80\n process_one_work+0x12e/0x2c0\n worker_thread+0x295/0x3a0\n\nMost of the time, however, processes just get stuck forever in\nfolio_wait_bit_common(), waiting for `PG_locked` to disappear, which\nnever happens because nobody is really holding the folio lock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: fs/nfs/read: corrige error de doble desbloqueo en nfs_return_empty_folio() En ocasiones, cuando se le\u00eda un archivo mientras otro cliente NFS lo estaba truncando, el kernel pod\u00eda bloquearse porque se llamaba a folio_unlock() dos veces y la segunda llamada XOR devolver\u00eda el indicador `PG_locked`. La mayor\u00eda de las veces (dependiendo del momento del truncamiento), nadie nota el problema porque folio_unlock() se llama tres veces, lo que desactiva `PG_locked`: 1. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... nfs_read_add_folio, nfs_return_empty_folio 2. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... netfs_read_collection, netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages 3. vfs_read, ... nfs_do_read_folio, nfs_read_add_folio, nfs_return_empty_folio El problema es que nfs_read_add_folio() no debe desbloquear el folio si fscache est\u00e1 habilitado, y falta una comprobaci\u00f3n nfs_netfs_folio_unlock() en nfs_return_empty_folio(). En raras ocasiones, esto genera una advertencia en netfs_read_collection(): ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ R=0000031c: el folio 10 no est\u00e1 bloqueado ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 29 en fs/netfs/read_collect.c:133 netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00 [...] Cola de trabajo: events_unbound netfs_read_collection_worker RIP: 0010:netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00 [...] Rastreo de llamadas: netfs_read_collection_worker+0x67/0x80 process_one_work+0x12e/0x2c0worker_thread+0x295/0x3a0 Sin embargo, la mayor\u00eda de las veces, los procesos simplemente se quedan atascados para siempre en folio_wait_bit_common(), esperando que `PG_locked` desaparezca, lo que nunca sucede porque nadie est\u00e1 realmente reteniendo el cerradura de folio. "
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-38338",
"lastModified": "2026-11-05T21:18:27.917",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-38338",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T20:55:00.358504Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-07-10T09:15:28.510",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-415"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-11-05T14:58:04+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-38338",
"id": "CVE-2025-38338",
"initial_release_date": "2025-07-10T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "124",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "76",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-38338.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-38338",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T20:55:00.358504Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T20:55:01.684Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/read.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "000dbe0bec058cbf2ca9e156e4a5584f5158b0f9",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/nfs/read.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.4",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.95",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.35",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.16",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.95",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.35",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()\n\nSometimes, when a file was read while it was being truncated by\nanother NFS client, the kernel could deadlock because folio_unlock()\nwas called twice, and the second call would XOR back the `PG_locked`\nflag.\n\nMost of the time (depending on the timing of the truncation), nobody\nnotices the problem because folio_unlock() gets called three times,\nwhich flips `PG_locked` back off:\n\n 1. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... nfs_read_add_folio,\n nfs_return_empty_folio\n 2. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... netfs_read_collection,\n netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages\n 3. vfs_read, ... nfs_do_read_folio, nfs_read_add_folio,\n nfs_return_empty_folio\n\nThe problem is that nfs_read_add_folio() is not supposed to unlock the\nfolio if fscache is enabled, and a nfs_netfs_folio_unlock() check is\nmissing in nfs_return_empty_folio().\n\nRarely this leads to a warning in netfs_read_collection():\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n R=0000031c: folio 10 is not locked\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 29 at fs/netfs/read_collect.c:133 netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_read_collection_worker\n RIP: 0010:netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n netfs_read_collection_worker+0x67/0x80\n process_one_work+0x12e/0x2c0\n worker_thread+0x295/0x3a0\n\nMost of the time, however, processes just get stuck forever in\nfolio_wait_bit_common(), waiting for `PG_locked` to disappear, which\nnever happens because nobody is really holding the folio lock."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T21:26:03.883Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14f5549ad163be2c018abc1bb38370fff617a243"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5bf0b9eeb0174686f22c2e5b8fb9f47ad25da6f5"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e93b61d3eaa14bfebcc2716ac09d43f3845d420"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c10fa44bc5f700e2ea21de2fbae520ba21f19d9"
}
],
"title": "fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-38338",
"datePublished": "2025-07-10T08:15:09.022Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T04:51:24.005Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T21:02:34.128Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.