CVE-2025-30156 (GCVE-0-2025-30156)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-27 20:34 – Updated: 2026-09-01 03:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery
Summary
Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform providing object, block, and file storage. In versions prior to 20.2.4 and 19.2.6, the CephX authentication protocol encrypts tickets with AES-128-CBC in an unauthenticated mode that uses a hard-coded initialization vector and no message authentication, allowing an attacker to forge credentials and gain cluster-wide access. Because the ciphertext is malleable and the monitor will encrypt attacker-chosen entity names, an attacker holding one low-privilege key and able to observe CephX traffic can use the monitor as an encryption oracle and splice ciphertext blocks into valid tickets for privileged entities such as Manager, MDS, and OSD. The same lack of authentication also lets an attacker with CephX permissions escalate privileges by flipping a single bit in a service ticket to set its allow_all field to true. This issue is fixed in versions 20.2.4 and 19.2.6.
Severity
8.9 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-327 - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd8… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30156",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T03:56:14.462Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ceph",
"vendor": "ceph",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 19.2.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 20.0.0, \u003c 20.2.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform providing object, block, and file storage. In versions prior to 20.2.4 and 19.2.6, the CephX authentication protocol encrypts tickets with AES-128-CBC in an unauthenticated mode that uses a hard-coded initialization vector and no message authentication, allowing an attacker to forge credentials and gain cluster-wide access. Because the ciphertext is malleable and the monitor will encrypt attacker-chosen entity names, an attacker holding one low-privilege key and able to observe CephX traffic can use the monitor as an encryption oracle and splice ciphertext blocks into valid tickets for privileged entities such as Manager, MDS, and OSD. The same lack of authentication also lets an attacker with CephX permissions escalate privileges by flipping a single bit in a service ticket to set its allow_all field to true. This issue is fixed in versions 20.2.4 and 19.2.6."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T20:34:41.822Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09c8b95177717cc7e9dd4377e2f0f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09c8b95177717cc7e9dd4377e2f0f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd89e2975280f2a906c71c2f6effd6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd89e2975280f2a906c71c2f6effd6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30156",
"datePublished": "2026-08-27T20:34:41.822Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T12:41:42.566Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T03:56:14.462Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-30156",
"date": "2026-11-01",
"epss": "0.00133",
"percentile": "0.02821"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-09-24T01:35:30.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2025-30156",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2025-30156",
"initial_release_date": "2026-08-29T01:02:34.000Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "2",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2025-30156.json",
"version": "4"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "ceph",
"vendor": "ceph",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 19.2.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 20.0.0, \u003c 20.2.4"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform providing object, block, and file storage. In versions prior to 20.2.4 and 19.2.6, the CephX authentication protocol encrypts tickets with AES-128-CBC in an unauthenticated mode that uses a hard-coded initialization vector and no message authentication, allowing an attacker to forge credentials and gain cluster-wide access. Because the ciphertext is malleable and the monitor will encrypt attacker-chosen entity names, an attacker holding one low-privilege key and able to observe CephX traffic can use the monitor as an encryption oracle and splice ciphertext blocks into valid tickets for privileged entities such as Manager, MDS, and OSD. The same lack of authentication also lets an attacker with CephX permissions escalate privileges by flipping a single bit in a service ticket to set its allow_all field to true. This issue is fixed in versions 20.2.4 and 19.2.6."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Ceph es una plataforma de almacenamiento distribuido de c\u00f3digo abierto que ofrece almacenamiento de objetos, bloques y archivos. En versiones anteriores a 20.2.4 y 19.2.6, el protocolo de autenticaci\u00f3n CephX cifra los tickets con AES-128-CBC en un modo no autenticado que utiliza un vector de inicializaci\u00f3n codificado de forma fija y no incluye autenticaci\u00f3n de mensaje, lo que permite al atacante falsificar credenciales y obtener acceso a todo el cl\u00faster. Debido a que el texto cifrado es maleable y el monitor cifrar\u00e1 nombres de entidad elegidos por el atacante, un atacante que posea una clave de bajo privilegio y pueda observar el tr\u00e1fico CephX puede usar el monitor como un or\u00e1culo de cifrado e insertar bloques de texto cifrado en tickets v\u00e1lidos para entidades privilegiadas como Manager, MDS y OSD. La misma falta de autenticaci\u00f3n tambi\u00e9n permite a un atacante con permisos CephX escalar privilegios al cambiar un solo bit en un ticket de servicio para establecer su campo allow_all a verdadero. Este problema est\u00e1 solucionado en versiones 20.2.4 y 19.2.6."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-30156",
"lastModified": "2026-10-19T22:10:00.130",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.3,
"impactScore": 6.0,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30156",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-28T00:16:45.557",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09c8b95177717cc7e9dd4377e2f0f"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd89e2975280f2a906c71c2f6effd6"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-327"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Important",
"current_release_date": "2026-10-21T08:53:28+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-30156",
"id": "CVE-2025-30156",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "1689",
"product_status:known_affected": "63",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "95",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: ceph: kernel: Ceph: exploit of hardcoded IVECs, in a misuse of AES, resulting in authentication bypass",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-30156.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30156",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T18:22:42.595925Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T18:22:48.757Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ceph",
"vendor": "ceph",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 19.2.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 20.0.0, \u003c 20.2.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Ceph is an open-source distributed storage platform providing object, block, and file storage. In versions prior to 20.2.4 and 19.2.6, the CephX authentication protocol encrypts tickets with AES-128-CBC in an unauthenticated mode that uses a hard-coded initialization vector and no message authentication, allowing an attacker to forge credentials and gain cluster-wide access. Because the ciphertext is malleable and the monitor will encrypt attacker-chosen entity names, an attacker holding one low-privilege key and able to observe CephX traffic can use the monitor as an encryption oracle and splice ciphertext blocks into valid tickets for privileged entities such as Manager, MDS, and OSD. The same lack of authentication also lets an attacker with CephX permissions escalate privileges by flipping a single bit in a service ticket to set its allow_all field to true. This issue is fixed in versions 20.2.4 and 19.2.6."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-327",
"description": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T20:34:41.822Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09c8b95177717cc7e9dd4377e2f0f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2ba086255de09c8b95177717cc7e9dd4377e2f0f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd89e2975280f2a906c71c2f6effd6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3078188a7bdd89e2975280f2a906c71c2f6effd6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7q3q-3975-qw3q",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Ceph: AES-CBC misuse in CephX and RADOSGW enables authentication bypass and credential forgery"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30156",
"datePublished": "2026-08-27T20:34:41.822Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T12:41:42.566Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T03:56:14.462Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.