Vulnerability-Lookup

Search criteria ⓘ Use full-text search for keyword queries.
Combine vendor, product, and sources to narrow results.
Enable “Apply ordering” to sort by dates instead of relevance.

Full-Text Search

Vendor

Product

Assigner

Sources

Sort by

Order

Apply ordering (override relevance)

Related vulnerabilities

GHSA-XGPC-Q899-67P8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-25 15:11 – Updated: 2025-05-05 22:00

Summary

Fleet doesn’t validate a server’s certificate when connecting through SSH

Details

Impact

A vulnerability has been identified within Fleet where, by default, Fleet will automatically trust a remote server’s certificate when connecting through SSH if the certificate isn’t set in the known_hosts file. This could allow the execution of a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack against Fleet. In case the server that is being connected to has a trusted entry in the known_hosts file, then Fleet will correctly check the authenticity of the presented certificate.

Please consult the associated MITRE ATT&CK - Technique - Adversary-in-the-Middle for further information about this category of attack.

Patches

Patched versions include releases v0.10.12, v0.11.7 and v0.12.2.

The fix involves some key areas with the following changes:

Git latest commit fetcher sources known_hosts entries from the following locations, in decreasing order of priority:
Secret referenced in a GitRepo’s clientSecretName field;
If no secret is referenced, in a gitcredential secret located in the GitRepo’s namespace;
If that secret does not exist, in a (new) known-hosts config map installed by Fleet, populated statically with public entries shared by a few git providers: Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps;
Git cloner: same as above.
fleet apply command: same as above. The command reads entries from a FLEET_KNOWN_HOSTS environment variable. That command is typically run within a container inside a job pod created by Fleet to update bundles from a new commit. However, users may also decide to run it locally, perhaps even with multiple concurrent executions of the command on the same machine. To cater for this, fleet apply writes the contents of FLEET_KNOWN_HOSTS, if any, to a temporary file with a random name, and deletes that file once bundles have been created. This reduces the risk of conflicts between concurrent runs. This happens regardless of the git repository URL (SSH or not), since a repository may reference artifacts to be retrieved using SSH anyway.

Note about sourcing known_hosts entries: if entries are found in a supported source, whatever that source may be, then those entries will be used. For instance, if wrong entries, or an incomplete set of entries (e.g. only BitBucket entries for a GitRepo pointing to Github) are found in a secret referenced in a GitRepo’s clientSecretName field, they will still be used. This will lead to errors if strict host key checks are enabled, even if matching, correct entries are found in another source with lower priority, such as the known-hosts config map. Fleet will not use one source to complement the other.

Note: Fleet v0.9 release line does not have the fix for this CVE. The fix for v0.9 was considered too complex and with the risk of introducing instabilities right before this version goes into end-of-life (EOL), as documented in SUSE’s Product Support Lifecycle page. Please see the section below for workarounds or consider upgrading to a newer and patched version of Rancher.

Workarounds

There are no workarounds for this issue. Users are recommended to upgrade, as soon as possible, to a version of Fleet that contains the fixes.

References

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: - Reach out to the SUSE Rancher Security team for security related inquiries. - Open an issue in the Rancher repository. - Verify with our support matrix and product support lifecycle.

Severity ?

6.3 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.9.0-rc.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.10.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.11.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.11.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/rancher/fleet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.12.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.12.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-23390"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-25T15:11:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nA vulnerability has been identified within Fleet where, by default, Fleet will automatically trust a remote server\u2019s certificate when connecting through SSH if the certificate isn\u2019t set in the `known_hosts` file. This could allow the execution of a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack against Fleet. In case the server that is being connected to has a trusted entry in the known_hosts file, then Fleet will correctly check the authenticity of the presented certificate. \n\nPlease consult the associated  [MITRE ATT\u0026CK - Technique - Adversary-in-the-Middle](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1557/) for further information about this category of attack.\n\n### Patches\nPatched versions include releases `v0.10.12`, `v0.11.7` and `v0.12.2`.\n\nThe fix involves some key areas with the following changes:\n\n- Git latest commit fetcher sources `known_hosts` entries from the following locations, in decreasing order of priority:\n  1. Secret referenced in a `GitRepo`\u2019s `clientSecretName` field;\n  2. If no secret is referenced, in a `gitcredential` secret located in the `GitRepo`\u2019s namespace;\n  3. If that secret does not exist, in a (new) `known-hosts` config map installed by Fleet, populated statically with public entries shared by a few git providers: Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps;\n\n- Git cloner: same as above.\n\n- `fleet apply` command: same as above. The command reads entries from a `FLEET_KNOWN_HOSTS` environment variable. That command is typically run within a container inside a job pod created by Fleet to update bundles from a new commit. However, users may also decide to run it locally, perhaps even with multiple concurrent executions of the command on the same machine. To cater for this, `fleet apply` writes the contents of `FLEET_KNOWN_HOSTS`, if any, to a temporary file with a random name, and deletes that file once bundles have been created. This reduces the risk of conflicts between concurrent runs.\nThis happens regardless of the git repository URL (SSH or not), since a repository may reference artifacts to be retrieved using SSH anyway.\n\n**Note about sourcing `known_hosts` entries:** if entries are found in a supported source, whatever that source may be, then those entries will be used. For instance, if wrong entries, or an incomplete set of entries (e.g. only BitBucket entries for a `GitRepo` pointing to Github) are found in a secret referenced in a `GitRepo`\u2019s `clientSecretName` field, they will still be used. This will lead to errors if strict host key checks are enabled, even if matching, correct entries are found in another source with lower priority, such as the `known-hosts` config map. Fleet will not use one source to complement the other.\n\n**Note: Fleet v0.9 release line does not have the fix for this CVE. The fix for v0.9 was considered too complex and with the risk of introducing instabilities right before this version goes into end-of-life (EOL), as documented in [SUSE\u2019s Product Support Lifecycle](https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/#suse-rancher-prime) page. Please see the section below for workarounds or consider upgrading to a newer and patched version of Rancher.**\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no workarounds for this issue. Users are recommended to upgrade, as soon as possible, to a version of Fleet that contains the fixes.\n\n### References\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n- Reach out to the [SUSE Rancher Security team](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/policy) for security related inquiries.\n- Open an issue in the [Rancher](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/issues/new/choose) repository.\n- Verify with our [support matrix](https://www.suse.com/suse-rancher/support-matrix/all-supported-versions/) and [product support lifecycle](https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/).",
  "id": "GHSA-xgpc-q899-67p8",
  "modified": "2025-05-05T22:00:39Z",
  "published": "2025-04-25T15:11:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/security/advisories/GHSA-xgpc-q899-67p8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/pull/3571"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/pull/3572"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/pull/3573"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/releases/tag/v0.10.12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/releases/tag/v0.11.7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rancher/fleet/releases/tag/v0.12.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3649"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Fleet doesn\u2019t validate a server\u2019s certificate when connecting through SSH"
}

OPENSUSE-SU-2025:15059-1

Vulnerability from csaf_opensuse - Published: 2025-05-07 00:00 - Updated: 2025-05-07 00:00

Summary

govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250506T153719-1.1 on GA media

Severity

Moderate

Notes

Title of the patch: govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250506T153719-1.1 on GA media

Description of the patch: These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250506T153719-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Patchnames: openSUSE-Tumbleweed-2025-15059

CVE-2019-11243

8.1 (High)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H