CVE-2025-2245 (GCVE-0-2025-2245)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-04 09:54 – Updated: 2025-04-04 12:57- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitdefender | GravityZone Update Server |
Affected:
0 , < 3.5.2.689
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-2245",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-04T12:56:49.957910Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T12:57:26.616Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GravityZone Update Server",
"vendor": "Bitdefender",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.2.689",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nicolas Verdier (@n1nj4sec)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-04-04T09:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server when operating in Relay Mode. The HTTP proxy component on port 7074 uses a domain allowlist to restrict outbound requests, but fails to properly sanitize hostnames containing null-byte (\u003ccode\u003e%00\u003c/code\u003e) sequences. By crafting a request to a domain such as \u003ccode\u003eevil.com%00.bitdefender.com\u003c/code\u003e, an attacker can bypass the allowlist check, causing the proxy to forward requests to arbitrary external or internal systems."
}
],
"value": "A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server when operating in Relay Mode. The HTTP proxy component on port 7074 uses a domain allowlist to restrict outbound requests, but fails to properly sanitize hostnames containing null-byte (%00) sequences. By crafting a request to a domain such as evil.com%00.bitdefender.com, an attacker can bypass the allowlist check, causing the proxy to forward requests to arbitrary external or internal systems."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-3",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-3 Using Leading \u0027Ghost\u0027 Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T09:54:03.681Z",
"orgId": "b3d5ebe7-963e-41fb-98e1-2edaeabb8f82",
"shortName": "Bitdefender"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.bitdefender.com/support/security-advisories/server-side-request-forgery-in-gravityzone-update-server-using-null-bytes-va-12646"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An automatic update to version\u0026nbsp;3.5.2.689 fixes the issue."
}
],
"value": "An automatic update to version\u00a03.5.2.689 fixes the issue."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Server Side Request Forgery in GravityZone Update Server Using Null Bytes (VA-12646)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b3d5ebe7-963e-41fb-98e1-2edaeabb8f82",
"assignerShortName": "Bitdefender",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-2245",
"datePublished": "2025-04-04T09:54:03.681Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-12T11:14:14.019Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T12:57:26.616Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-2245",
"date": "2026-11-11",
"epss": "0.00321",
"percentile": "0.25421"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GravityZone Update Server",
"vendor": "Bitdefender",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.2.689",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve-requests@bitdefender.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bitdefender:gravityzone_update_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2BB7F764-E560-4EBD-BFA6-9C96DB27CD1C",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.5.2.689",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server when operating in Relay Mode. The HTTP proxy component on port 7074 uses a domain allowlist to restrict outbound requests, but fails to properly sanitize hostnames containing null-byte (%00) sequences. By crafting a request to a domain such as evil.com%00.bitdefender.com, an attacker can bypass the allowlist check, causing the proxy to forward requests to arbitrary external or internal systems."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Existe una vulnerabilidad de server-side request forgery (SSRF) en Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server al operar en modo de retransmisi\u00f3n. El componente proxy HTTP en el puerto 7074 utiliza una lista de permitidos de dominio para restringir las solicitudes salientes, pero no depura correctamente los nombres de host que contienen secuencias de bytes nulos (%00). Al manipular una solicitud a un dominio como evil.com%00.bitdefender.com, un atacante puede eludir la comprobaci\u00f3n de la lista de permitidos, lo que provoca que el proxy reenv\u00ede las solicitudes a sistemas externos o internos arbitrarios."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-2245",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:06:36.817",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "cve-requests@bitdefender.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-2245",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-04T12:56:49.957910Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-04T10:15:16.740",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve-requests@bitdefender.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.bitdefender.com/support/security-advisories/server-side-request-forgery-in-gravityzone-update-server-using-null-bytes-va-12646"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve-requests@bitdefender.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "cve-requests@bitdefender.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-28T17:51:32+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-2245",
"id": "CVE-2025-2245",
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-04T09:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Server Side Request Forgery in GravityZone Update Server Using Null Bytes (VA-12646)",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-2245.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-2245",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-04T12:56:49.957910Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T12:57:17.686Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GravityZone Update Server",
"vendor": "Bitdefender",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.5.2.689",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nicolas Verdier (@n1nj4sec)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-04-04T09:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server when operating in Relay Mode. The HTTP proxy component on port 7074 uses a domain allowlist to restrict outbound requests, but fails to properly sanitize hostnames containing null-byte (\u003ccode\u003e%00\u003c/code\u003e) sequences. By crafting a request to a domain such as \u003ccode\u003eevil.com%00.bitdefender.com\u003c/code\u003e, an attacker can bypass the allowlist check, causing the proxy to forward requests to arbitrary external or internal systems."
}
],
"value": "A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server when operating in Relay Mode. The HTTP proxy component on port 7074 uses a domain allowlist to restrict outbound requests, but fails to properly sanitize hostnames containing null-byte (%00) sequences. By crafting a request to a domain such as evil.com%00.bitdefender.com, an attacker can bypass the allowlist check, causing the proxy to forward requests to arbitrary external or internal systems."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-3",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-3 Using Leading \u0027Ghost\u0027 Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T09:54:03.681Z",
"orgId": "b3d5ebe7-963e-41fb-98e1-2edaeabb8f82",
"shortName": "Bitdefender"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.bitdefender.com/support/security-advisories/server-side-request-forgery-in-gravityzone-update-server-using-null-bytes-va-12646"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An automatic update to version\u0026nbsp;3.5.2.689 fixes the issue."
}
],
"value": "An automatic update to version\u00a03.5.2.689 fixes the issue."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Server Side Request Forgery in GravityZone Update Server Using Null Bytes (VA-12646)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b3d5ebe7-963e-41fb-98e1-2edaeabb8f82",
"assignerShortName": "Bitdefender",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-2245",
"datePublished": "2025-04-04T09:54:03.681Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-12T11:14:14.019Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T12:57:26.616Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.