GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2025-15468 (GCVE-0-2025-15468)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-27 16:01 – Updated: 2026-01-29 14:53
VLAI
Title
NULL dereference in SSL_CIPHER_find() function on unknown cipher ID
Summary
Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in a QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from the peer, a NULL dereference occurs. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference leads to abnormal termination of the running process causing Denial of Service. Some applications call SSL_CIPHER_find() from the client_hello_cb callback on the cipher ID received from the peer. If this is done with an SSL object implementing the QUIC protocol, NULL pointer dereference will happen if the examined cipher ID is unknown or unsupported. As it is not very common to call this function in applications using the QUIC protocol and the worst outcome is Denial of Service, the issue was assessed as Low severity. The vulnerable code was introduced in the 3.2 version with the addition of the QUIC protocol support. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue, as the QUIC implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-01-29 14:52 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-476 - NULL Pointer Dereference
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
OpenSSL OpenSSL Affected: 3.6.0 , < 3.6.1 (semver)
Affected: 3.5.0 , < 3.5.5 (semver)
Affected: 3.4.0 , < 3.4.4 (semver)
Affected: 3.3.0 , < 3.3.6 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-01-27 14:00
Credits
Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research) Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 5.9,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-15468",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-29T14:52:10.289567Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T14:53:03.572Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.4.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.4.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.3.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.3.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in\u003cbr\u003ea QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from\u003cbr\u003ethe peer, a NULL dereference occurs.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A NULL pointer dereference leads to abnormal termination of\u003cbr\u003ethe running process causing Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome applications call SSL_CIPHER_find() from the client_hello_cb callback\u003cbr\u003eon the cipher ID received from the peer. If this is done with an SSL object\u003cbr\u003eimplementing the QUIC protocol, NULL pointer dereference will happen if\u003cbr\u003ethe examined cipher ID is unknown or unsupported.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAs it is not very common to call this function in applications using the QUIC \u003cbr\u003eprotocol and the worst outcome is Denial of Service, the issue was assessed\u003cbr\u003eas Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerable code was introduced in the 3.2 version with the addition\u003cbr\u003eof the QUIC protocol support.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue,\u003cbr\u003eas the QUIC implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in\na QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from\nthe peer, a NULL dereference occurs.\n\nImpact summary: A NULL pointer dereference leads to abnormal termination of\nthe running process causing Denial of Service.\n\nSome applications call SSL_CIPHER_find() from the client_hello_cb callback\non the cipher ID received from the peer. If this is done with an SSL object\nimplementing the QUIC protocol, NULL pointer dereference will happen if\nthe examined cipher ID is unknown or unsupported.\n\nAs it is not very common to call this function in applications using the QUIC \nprotocol and the worst outcome is Denial of Service, the issue was assessed\nas Low severity.\n\nThe vulnerable code was introduced in the 3.2 version with the addition\nof the QUIC protocol support.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue,\nas the QUIC implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.\n\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.\n\nOpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-476",
              "description": "CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T16:01:20.824Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.6.1 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b2539639400288a4580fe2d76247541b976bade4"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.5.5 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1f08e54bad32843044fe8a675948d65e3b4ece65"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.4.4 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7c88376731c589ee5b36116c5a6e32d5ae5f7ae2"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.3.6 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d75b309879631d45b972396ce4e5102559c64ac7"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "NULL dereference in SSL_CIPHER_find() function on unknown cipher ID",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-15468",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-27T16:01:20.824Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-06T09:27:08.013Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T14:53:03.572Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-15468",
      "date": "2026-09-16",
      "epss": "0.00777",
      "percentile": "0.54083"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-15468\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2026-01-27T16:16:14.400\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T08:37:50.723\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in\\na QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from\\nthe peer, a NULL dereference occurs.\\n\\nImpact summary: A NULL pointer dereference leads to abnormal termination of\\nthe running process causing Denial of Service.\\n\\nSome applications call SSL_CIPHER_find() from the client_hello_cb callback\\non the cipher ID received from the peer. If this is done with an SSL object\\nimplementing the QUIC protocol, NULL pointer dereference will happen if\\nthe examined cipher ID is unknown or unsupported.\\n\\nAs it is not very common to call this function in applications using the QUIC \\nprotocol and the worst outcome is Denial of Service, the issue was assessed\\nas Low severity.\\n\\nThe vulnerable code was introduced in the 3.2 version with the addition\\nof the QUIC protocol support.\\n\\nThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue,\\nas the QUIC implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Resumen del problema: Si una aplicaci\u00f3n que utiliza la funci\u00f3n SSL_CIPHER_find() en un cliente o servidor del protocolo QUIC recibe un conjunto de cifrado desconocido del par, ocurre una desreferencia de NULL.\\n\\nResumen del impacto: Una desreferencia de puntero NULL conduce a la terminaci\u00f3n anormal del proceso en ejecuci\u00f3n causando Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio.\\n\\nAlgunas aplicaciones llaman a SSL_CIPHER_find() desde la devoluci\u00f3n de llamada client_hello_cb en el ID de cifrado recibido del par. Si esto se hace con un objeto SSL que implementa el protocolo QUIC, ocurrir\u00e1 una desreferencia de puntero NULL si el ID de cifrado examinado es desconocido o no compatible.\\n\\nComo no es muy com\u00fan llamar a esta funci\u00f3n en aplicaciones que utilizan el protocolo QUIC y el peor resultado es Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio, el problema fue evaluado como de baja severidad.\\n\\nEl c\u00f3digo vulnerable fue introducido en la versi\u00f3n 3.2 con la adici\u00f3n del soporte para el protocolo QUIC.\\n\\nLos m\u00f3dulos FIPS en 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 y 3.3 no se ven afectados por este problema, ya que la implementaci\u00f3n de QUIC est\u00e1 fuera del l\u00edmite del m\u00f3dulo FIPS de OpenSSL.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 y 3.3 son vulnerables a este problema.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 y 1.0.2 no se ven afectados por este problema.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"OpenSSL\",\"product\":\"OpenSSL\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"3.6.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.6.1\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.5.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.5.5\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.4.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.4.4\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.3.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.3.6\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-01-29T14:52:10.289567Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2025-15468\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-476\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.3.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.3.6\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F5292E9E-6B50-409F-9219-7B0A04047AD8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.4.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.4.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B9D3DCAE-317D-4DFB-93F0-7A235A229619\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.5.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.5.5\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1CAC7CBE-EC03-4089-938A-0CEEB2E09B62\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.6.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.6.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68352537-5E99-4F4D-B78A-BCF0353A70A5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1f08e54bad32843044fe8a675948d65e3b4ece65\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7c88376731c589ee5b36116c5a6e32d5ae5f7ae2\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b2539639400288a4580fe2d76247541b976bade4\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d75b309879631d45b972396ce4e5102559c64ac7\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-08T23:07:14+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-15468",
      "id": "CVE-2025-15468",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "107",
      "product_status:known_affected": "60",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "5",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via NULL pointer dereference in QUIC protocol handling",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-15468.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-15468\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-01-29T14:52:10.289567Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-29T14:52:44.354Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"NULL dereference in SSL_CIPHER_find() function on unknown cipher ID\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"Low\"}}, \"format\": \"other\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"OpenSSL\", \"product\": \"OpenSSL\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.6.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.6.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.5.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.5.5\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.4.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.4.4\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.3.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.3.6\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt\", \"name\": \"OpenSSL Advisory\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b2539639400288a4580fe2d76247541b976bade4\", \"name\": \"3.6.1 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1f08e54bad32843044fe8a675948d65e3b4ece65\", \"name\": \"3.5.5 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7c88376731c589ee5b36116c5a6e32d5ae5f7ae2\", \"name\": \"3.4.4 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d75b309879631d45b972396ce4e5102559c64ac7\", \"name\": \"3.3.6 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in\\na QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from\\nthe peer, a NULL dereference occurs.\\n\\nImpact summary: A NULL pointer dereference leads to abnormal termination of\\nthe running process causing Denial of Service.\\n\\nSome applications call SSL_CIPHER_find() from the client_hello_cb callback\\non the cipher ID received from the peer. If this is done with an SSL object\\nimplementing the QUIC protocol, NULL pointer dereference will happen if\\nthe examined cipher ID is unknown or unsupported.\\n\\nAs it is not very common to call this function in applications using the QUIC \\nprotocol and the worst outcome is Denial of Service, the issue was assessed\\nas Low severity.\\n\\nThe vulnerable code was introduced in the 3.2 version with the addition\\nof the QUIC protocol support.\\n\\nThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue,\\nas the QUIC implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in\u003cbr\u003ea QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from\u003cbr\u003ethe peer, a NULL dereference occurs.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A NULL pointer dereference leads to abnormal termination of\u003cbr\u003ethe running process causing Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome applications call SSL_CIPHER_find() from the client_hello_cb callback\u003cbr\u003eon the cipher ID received from the peer. If this is done with an SSL object\u003cbr\u003eimplementing the QUIC protocol, NULL pointer dereference will happen if\u003cbr\u003ethe examined cipher ID is unknown or unsupported.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAs it is not very common to call this function in applications using the QUIC \u003cbr\u003eprotocol and the worst outcome is Denial of Service, the issue was assessed\u003cbr\u003eas Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerable code was introduced in the 3.2 version with the addition\u003cbr\u003eof the QUIC protocol support.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue,\u003cbr\u003eas the QUIC implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-476\", \"description\": \"CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"shortName\": \"openssl\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-27T16:01:20.824Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-15468\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-29T14:53:03.572Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-01-06T09:27:08.013Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-27T16:01:20.824Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openssl\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.