CVE-2025-13872 (GCVE-0-2025-13872)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-02 09:51 – Updated: 2025-12-02 16:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet Opinio
Summary
Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of
ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 rev12562 on
Web-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests
to an arbitrary destination.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-12-02 16:50 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html | release-notes |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ObjectPlanet | Opinio |
Affected:
7.26 rev12562
cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26_rev12562:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2025-07-31 08:54
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T16:50:34.265761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:55:02.348Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"The feature to import a survey"
],
"product": "Opinio",
"vendor": "ObjectPlanet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.26 rev12562"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26_rev12562:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dominique Righetto"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-31T08:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\n\nBlind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eObjectPlanet\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eOpinio\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;7.26 rev12562\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;on \u003cem\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination.\n\n\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio\u00a07.26 rev12562\u00a0on \n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"orgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"shortName": "TCS-CERT"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-01T09:10:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability discovery"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-10T14:22:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to TCS-CERT"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-19T15:33:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to Vendor through email : opinio@support.objectplanet.com"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-24T15:34:00.000Z",
"value": "Feedback asked to vendor, check if the vendor received the PoC in an encrypted archive"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-10T15:32:00.000Z",
"value": "New follow-up email was send to the vendor"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-13T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor confirmed the reception of the PoC, vendor asked to wait 90-day period before publishing (responsible disclosure), and will try to fix the vulnerability"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-14T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Answer to vendor to acknowledge 90 days period"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-03-10T15:38:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor informed us that they will realse the fix by the end of this month"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-23T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "An email was sent to check where they stand on the release and fixes for the reported issues"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-21T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-30T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-31T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "The vendor released the newer fixed version which is the Opinio Version 7.27"
}
],
"title": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"assignerShortName": "TCS-CERT",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13872",
"datePublished": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-02T09:17:04.605Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:55:02.348Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-13872",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00331",
"percentile": "0.26566"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"The feature to import a survey"
],
"product": "Opinio",
"vendor": "ObjectPlanet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.26 rev12562"
}
]
}
],
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6684DC3A-4DF1-4417-913C-EE8E169B75B5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio\u00a07.26 rev12562\u00a0on \n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Server-Side Request Forgery ciega (SSRF) en la caracter\u00edstica de importaci\u00f3n de encuestas de ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 rev12562 en plataformas basadas en web permite a un atacante forzar al servidor a realizar peticiones HTTP GET a trav\u00e9s de peticiones de importaci\u00f3n elaboradas a un destino arbitrario."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"lastModified": "2026-09-26T00:10:00.127",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T16:50:34.265761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-12-02T10:16:01.877",
"references": [
{
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"tags": [
"Release Notes"
],
"url": "https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-12-03T10:04:56+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-13872",
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"initial_release_date": "2025-07-31T08:54:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-13872.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13872",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T16:50:34.265761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:50:33.197Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"modules": [
"The feature to import a survey"
],
"product": "Opinio",
"vendor": "ObjectPlanet",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.26 rev12562"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:objectplanet:opinio:7.26_rev12562:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dominique Righetto"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-31T08:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\n\nBlind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eObjectPlanet\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eOpinio\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;7.26 rev12562\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;on \u003cem\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination.\n\n\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of \n\n ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio\u00a07.26 rev12562\u00a0on \n\nWeb-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests \n\n to an arbitrary destination."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"orgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"shortName": "TCS-CERT"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://www.objectplanet.com/opinio/changelog.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-01T09:10:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability discovery"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-10T14:22:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to TCS-CERT"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-19T15:33:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability Report to Vendor through email : opinio@support.objectplanet.com"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-12-24T15:34:00.000Z",
"value": "Feedback asked to vendor, check if the vendor received the PoC in an encrypted archive"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-10T15:32:00.000Z",
"value": "New follow-up email was send to the vendor"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-13T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor confirmed the reception of the PoC, vendor asked to wait 90-day period before publishing (responsible disclosure), and will try to fix the vulnerability"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-01-14T15:37:00.000Z",
"value": "Answer to vendor to acknowledge 90 days period"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-03-10T15:38:00.000Z",
"value": "Vendor informed us that they will realse the fix by the end of this month"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-23T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "An email was sent to check where they stand on the release and fixes for the reported issues"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-21T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-30T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "A feedback was requested from vendor regarding their progreess"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-31T14:39:00.000Z",
"value": "The vendor released the newer fixed version which is the Opinio Version 7.27"
}
],
"title": "Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet\u00a0Opinio",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "64c5ae8f-7972-4697-86a0-7ada793ac795",
"assignerShortName": "TCS-CERT",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13872",
"datePublished": "2025-12-02T09:51:59.865Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-02T09:17:04.605Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T16:55:02.348Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.