CVE-2025-12742 (GCVE-0-2025-12742)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-25 05:38 – Updated: 2025-11-25 14:39
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Remote Code Execution in Looker via Teradata JDBC Driver
Summary
A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.
Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.
This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances. No user action is required for these.
Self-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.
The versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ :
* 24.12.108+
* 24.18.200+
* 25.0.78+
* 25.6.65+
* 25.8.47+
* 25.12.10+
* 25.14+
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-11-25 14:38 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Cloud | Looker |
Affected:
0 , < 24.12.108
(custom)
Affected: 0 , < 24.18.200 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.0.78 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.6.65 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.8.47 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.12.10 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.14 (custom) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12742",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T14:38:27.546926Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:39:05.212Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Looker-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Self-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sivanesh Ashok"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sreeram KL"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\u003cbr\u003eThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u0026nbsp;No user action is required for these.\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eas soon as possible\u003c/span\u003e. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://download.looker.com/\"\u003ehttps://download.looker.com/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e24.12.108+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e24.18.200+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.0.78+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.6.65+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.8.47+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.12.10+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.14+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\n\nLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\nThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u00a0No user action is required for these.\n\n\nSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\nThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ :\n * 24.12.108+\n * 24.18.200+\n * 25.0.78+\n * 25.6.65+\n * 25.8.47+\n * 25.12.10+\n * 25.14+"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "RED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Red",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T05:38:47.907Z",
"orgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"shortName": "GoogleCloud"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2025-052"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Remote Code Execution in Looker via Teradata JDBC Driver",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.4.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"assignerShortName": "GoogleCloud",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12742",
"datePublished": "2025-11-25T05:38:47.907Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-05T10:50:53.509Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:39:05.212Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-12742",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00253",
"percentile": "0.16917"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Looker-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Self-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\n\nLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\nThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u00a0No user action is required for these.\n\n\nSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\nThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ :\n * 24.12.108+\n * 24.18.200+\n * 25.0.78+\n * 25.6.65+\n * 25.8.47+\n * 25.12.10+\n * 25.14+"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Un usuario de Looker con un rol de Desarrollador podr\u00eda causar que Looker ejecutara un comando malicioso, debido al procesamiento inseguro de los par\u00e1metros del controlador de Teradata.\n\nSe encontr\u00f3 que las instancias Looker-hosted y Self-hosted eran vulnerables.\nEste problema ya ha sido mitigado para las instancias Looker-hosted. No se requiere ninguna acci\u00f3n del usuario para estas.\n\nLas instancias Self-hosted deben actualizarse lo antes posible. Esta vulnerabilidad ha sido parcheada en todas las versiones compatibles de Self-hosted.\nLas versiones a continuaci\u00f3n han sido todas actualizadas para protegerse de esta vulnerabilidad. Puede descargar estas versiones en la p\u00e1gina de descarga de Looker https://download.looker.com/ :\n* 24.12.108+\n* 24.18.200+\n* 25.0.78+\n* 25.6.65+\n* 25.8.47+\n* 25.12.10+\n* 25.14+"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-12742",
"lastModified": "2026-10-18T20:10:00.110",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "RED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Red",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12742",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T14:38:27.546926Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-11-25T06:15:45.333",
"references": [
{
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2025-052"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-78"
}
],
"source": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-11-26T16:56:39+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-12742",
"id": "CVE-2025-12742",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Remote Code Execution in Looker via Teradata JDBC Driver",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-12742.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12742",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T14:38:27.546926Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:38:57.582Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Looker-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Self-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sivanesh Ashok"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sreeram KL"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\u003cbr\u003eThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u0026nbsp;No user action is required for these.\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eas soon as possible\u003c/span\u003e. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://download.looker.com/\"\u003ehttps://download.looker.com/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e24.12.108+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e24.18.200+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.0.78+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.6.65+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.8.47+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.12.10+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.14+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\n\nLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\nThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u00a0No user action is required for these.\n\n\nSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\nThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ :\n * 24.12.108+\n * 24.18.200+\n * 25.0.78+\n * 25.6.65+\n * 25.8.47+\n * 25.12.10+\n * 25.14+"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "RED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Red",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T05:38:47.907Z",
"orgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"shortName": "GoogleCloud"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2025-052"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Remote Code Execution in Looker via Teradata JDBC Driver",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.4.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"assignerShortName": "GoogleCloud",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12742",
"datePublished": "2025-11-25T05:38:47.907Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-05T10:50:53.509Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:39:05.212Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.