CVE-2025-11935 (GCVE-0-2025-11935)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-21 22:04 – Updated: 2025-12-08 15:49
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3
Summary
With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension. The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-11-25 18:43 UTC
CWE
- CWE-326 - Inadequate Encryption Strength
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11935",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T18:43:57.465371Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T18:44:04.062Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.wolfssl.com/download",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"TLS"
],
"packageName": "wolfssl",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"MacOS"
],
"product": "wolfSSL",
"programFiles": [
"src/tls13.c",
"src/tls.c",
"wolfssl/internal.h"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl",
"vendor": "wolfSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.8.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.12.0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jaehun Lee, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Kyungmin Bae, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eserver responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eThe re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a\u00a0server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension.\u00a0The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-94",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-94 Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-326",
"description": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T15:49:43.595Z",
"orgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"shortName": "wolfSSL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9112"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"assignerShortName": "wolfSSL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11935",
"datePublished": "2025-11-21T22:04:52.335Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-17T22:24:22.960Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T15:49:43.595Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-11935",
"date": "2026-10-15",
"epss": "0.00213",
"percentile": "0.10808"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-12-02T01:39:52.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2025-11935",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2025-11935",
"initial_release_date": "2025-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "2",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2025/msrc_cve-2025-11935.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.wolfssl.com/download",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"TLS"
],
"packageName": "wolfssl",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"MacOS"
],
"product": "wolfSSL",
"programFiles": [
"src/tls13.c",
"src/tls.c",
"wolfssl/internal.h"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl",
"vendor": "wolfSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.8.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.12.0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "facts@wolfssl.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EB81B784-14DD-4CD0-859A-62D42ADDD7D3",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.8.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.8.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "387021A0-AF36-463C-A605-32EA7DAC172E",
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "703AF700-7A70-47E2-BC3A-7FD03B3CA9C1",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a\u00a0server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension.\u00a0The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-11935",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:31:26.360",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "facts@wolfssl.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11935",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T18:43:57.465371Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-11-21T22:16:18.920",
"references": [
{
"source": "facts@wolfssl.com",
"tags": [
"Product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl"
},
{
"source": "facts@wolfssl.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9112"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "facts@wolfssl.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-326"
}
],
"source": "facts@wolfssl.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-11-22T22:31:47+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-11935",
"id": "CVE-2025-11935",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-11935.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11935",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T18:43:57.465371Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T18:44:00.244Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.wolfssl.com/download",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"TLS"
],
"packageName": "wolfssl",
"platforms": [
"Linux",
"MacOS"
],
"product": "wolfSSL",
"programFiles": [
"src/tls13.c",
"src/tls.c",
"wolfssl/internal.h"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl",
"vendor": "wolfSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.8.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.12.0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jaehun Lee, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Kyungmin Bae, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eserver responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003eThe re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a\u00a0server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension.\u00a0The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-94",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-94 Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-326",
"description": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T15:49:43.595Z",
"orgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"shortName": "wolfSSL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9112"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27",
"assignerShortName": "wolfSSL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11935",
"datePublished": "2025-11-21T22:04:52.335Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-17T22:24:22.960Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T15:49:43.595Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.