CVE-2025-10650 (GCVE-0-2025-10650)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-18 19:11 – Updated: 2026-02-20 15:59- CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://advisories.softiron.cloud/ |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SoftIron | HyperCloud |
Affected:
2.5.0 , < 2.6.4
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-10650",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-18T20:43:14.329093Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-18T20:43:22.529Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HyperCloud",
"vendor": "SoftIron",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 through 2.6.3 may incorrectly add user SSH keys to the administrator-level authorized keys under certain conditions, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation to admin via SSH.\u0026nbsp;Affects non-production debug and internal development builds created between versions 2.5.0 and 2.6.3.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u003c/strong\u003eNo generally available (GA) or customer-released production builds were affected.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;There is no evidence that this issue was exposed in customer environments or production deployments."
}
],
"value": "SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 through 2.6.3 may incorrectly add user SSH keys to the administrator-level authorized keys under certain conditions, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation to admin via SSH.\u00a0Affects non-production debug and internal development builds created between versions 2.5.0 and 2.6.3.\u00a0 No generally available (GA) or customer-released production builds were affected.\u00a0\u00a0There is no evidence that this issue was exposed in customer environments or production deployments."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-233",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 1.8,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:59:52.914Z",
"orgId": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"shortName": "SoftIron"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://advisories.softiron.cloud/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Improper SSH Key Handling in Internal Debug Builds May Grant Cluster-Level Access to Non-Administrative Users",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"assignerShortName": "SoftIron",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-10650",
"datePublished": "2025-09-18T19:11:51.354Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-17T18:55:07.506Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:59:52.914Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-10650",
"date": "2026-11-10",
"epss": "0.00123",
"percentile": "0.02069"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HyperCloud",
"vendor": "SoftIron",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 through 2.6.3 may incorrectly add user SSH keys to the administrator-level authorized keys under certain conditions, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation to admin via SSH.\u00a0Affects non-production debug and internal development builds created between versions 2.5.0 and 2.6.3.\u00a0 No generally available (GA) or customer-released production builds were affected.\u00a0\u00a0There is no evidence that this issue was exposed in customer environments or production deployments."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 hasta 2.6.3 puede a\u00f1adir incorrectamente claves SSH de usuario a las claves autorizadas a nivel de administrador bajo ciertas condiciones, permitiendo una escalada de privilegios no autorizada a administrador v\u00eda SSH. Afecta a compilaciones de depuraci\u00f3n no productivas y de desarrollo interno creadas entre las versiones 2.5.0 y 2.6.3. Ninguna compilaci\u00f3n de disponibilidad general (GA) o de producci\u00f3n lanzada a clientes se vio afectada. No hay evidencia de que este problema haya sido expuesto en entornos de clientes o despliegues de producci\u00f3n."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-10650",
"lastModified": "2026-09-30T23:10:00.237",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 1.8,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-10650",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-18T20:43:14.329093Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-09-18T19:15:37.143",
"references": [
{
"source": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"url": "https://advisories.softiron.cloud/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-269"
}
],
"source": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-20T19:41:14+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-10650",
"id": "CVE-2025-10650",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Improper SSH Key Handling in Internal Debug Builds May Grant Cluster-Level Access to Non-Administrative Users",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-10650.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-10650",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-18T20:43:14.329093Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-18T20:43:18.388Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HyperCloud",
"vendor": "SoftIron",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 through 2.6.3 may incorrectly add user SSH keys to the administrator-level authorized keys under certain conditions, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation to admin via SSH.\u0026nbsp;Affects non-production debug and internal development builds created between versions 2.5.0 and 2.6.3.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u003c/strong\u003eNo generally available (GA) or customer-released production builds were affected.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;There is no evidence that this issue was exposed in customer environments or production deployments."
}
],
"value": "SoftIron HyperCloud 2.5.0 through 2.6.3 may incorrectly add user SSH keys to the administrator-level authorized keys under certain conditions, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation to admin via SSH.\u00a0Affects non-production debug and internal development builds created between versions 2.5.0 and 2.6.3.\u00a0 No generally available (GA) or customer-released production builds were affected.\u00a0\u00a0There is no evidence that this issue was exposed in customer environments or production deployments."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-233",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 1.8,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:59:52.914Z",
"orgId": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"shortName": "SoftIron"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://advisories.softiron.cloud/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Improper SSH Key Handling in Internal Debug Builds May Grant Cluster-Level Access to Non-Administrative Users",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0a72a055-908d-47f5-a16a-1f09049c16c6",
"assignerShortName": "SoftIron",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-10650",
"datePublished": "2025-09-18T19:11:51.354Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-17T18:55:07.506Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:59:52.914Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.