CVE-2024-55656 (GCVE-0-2024-55656)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-08 15:38 – Updated: 2025-01-08 15:52
VLAI
Title
RedisBloom Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Summary
RedisBloom adds a set of probabilistic data structures to Redis. There is an integer overflow vulnerability in RedisBloom, which is a module used in Redis. The integer overflow vulnerability allows an attacker (a redis client which knows the password) to allocate memory in the heap lesser than the required memory due to wraparound. Then read and write can be performed beyond this allocated memory, leading to info leak and OOB write. The integer overflow is in CMS.INITBYDIM command, which initialize a Count-Min Sketch to dimensions specified by user. It accepts two values (width and depth) and uses them to allocate memory in NewCMSketch(). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.19, 2.4.12, 2.6.14, and 2.8.2.
Severity
8.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-01-08 15:52 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-190 - Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Assigner
GitHub_M CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 72/100 over 7868 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
RedisBloom RedisBloom Affected: >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.19
Affected: >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.12
Affected: >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.14
Affected: >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.2
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-55656",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-08T15:52:13.800291Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T15:52:23.554Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RedisBloom",
          "vendor": "RedisBloom",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.2.0, \u003c 2.2.19"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.4.0, \u003c 2.4.12"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.6.0, \u003c 2.6.14"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.8.0, \u003c 2.8.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RedisBloom adds a set of probabilistic data structures to Redis. There is an integer overflow vulnerability in RedisBloom, which is a module used in Redis. The integer overflow vulnerability allows an attacker (a redis client which knows the password) to allocate memory in the heap lesser than the required memory due to wraparound. Then read and write can be performed beyond this allocated memory, leading to info leak and OOB write. The integer overflow is in CMS.INITBYDIM command, which initialize a Count-Min Sketch to dimensions specified by user. It accepts two values (width and depth) and uses them to allocate memory in NewCMSketch(). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.19, 2.4.12, 2.6.14, and 2.8.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-190",
              "description": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T15:38:54.859Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/RedisBloom/RedisBloom/security/advisories/GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/RedisBloom/RedisBloom/security/advisories/GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "RedisBloom Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-55656",
    "datePublished": "2025-01-08T15:38:54.859Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-12-10T14:48:24.296Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T15:52:23.554Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2024-55656",
      "date": "2026-11-15",
      "epss": "0.17116",
      "percentile": "0.97134"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "product": "RedisBloom",
                "vendor": "RedisBloom",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003e= 2.2.0, \u003c 2.2.19"
                  },
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003e= 2.4.0, \u003c 2.4.12"
                  },
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003e= 2.6.0, \u003c 2.6.14"
                  },
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003e= 2.8.0, \u003c 2.8.2"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "RedisBloom adds a set of probabilistic data structures to Redis. There is an integer overflow vulnerability in RedisBloom, which is a module used in Redis. The integer overflow vulnerability allows an attacker (a redis client which knows the password) to allocate memory in the heap lesser than the required memory due to wraparound. Then read and write can be performed beyond this allocated memory, leading to info leak and OOB write. The integer overflow is in CMS.INITBYDIM command, which initialize a Count-Min Sketch to dimensions specified by user. It accepts two values (width and depth) and uses them to allocate memory in NewCMSketch(). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.19, 2.4.12, 2.6.14, and 2.8.2."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "RedisBloom agrega un conjunto de estructuras de datos probabil\u00edsticas a Redis. Existe una vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de enteros en RedisBloom, que es un m\u00f3dulo utilizado en Redis. La vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de enteros permite a un atacante (un cliente de Redis que conoce la contrase\u00f1a) asignar memoria en el mont\u00f3n menor que la memoria requerida debido al envoltorio. Luego, se pueden realizar operaciones de lectura y escritura m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de esta memoria asignada, lo que genera una fuga de informaci\u00f3n y una escritura OOB. El desbordamiento de enteros se encuentra en el comando CMS.INITBYDIM, que inicializa un Count-Min Sketch con las dimensiones especificadas por el usuario. Acepta dos valores (ancho y profundidad) y los utiliza para asignar memoria en NewCMSketch(). Esta vulnerabilidad se corrigi\u00f3 en 2.2.19, 2.4.12, 2.6.14 y 2.8.2."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-55656",
        "lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:11:21.280",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-55656",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-08T15:52:13.800291Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2025-01-08T16:15:36.213",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/RedisBloom/RedisBloom/security/advisories/GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-190"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2025-05-28T22:08:04+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2024-55656",
      "id": "CVE-2024-55656",
      "initial_release_date": "2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "RedisBloom Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-55656.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2024-55656",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "total"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2025-01-08T15:52:13.800291Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T15:52:18.358Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "product": "RedisBloom",
              "vendor": "RedisBloom",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003e= 2.2.0, \u003c 2.2.19"
                },
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003e= 2.4.0, \u003c 2.4.12"
                },
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003e= 2.6.0, \u003c 2.6.14"
                },
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003e= 2.8.0, \u003c 2.8.2"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "RedisBloom adds a set of probabilistic data structures to Redis. There is an integer overflow vulnerability in RedisBloom, which is a module used in Redis. The integer overflow vulnerability allows an attacker (a redis client which knows the password) to allocate memory in the heap lesser than the required memory due to wraparound. Then read and write can be performed beyond this allocated memory, leading to info leak and OOB write. The integer overflow is in CMS.INITBYDIM command, which initialize a Count-Min Sketch to dimensions specified by user. It accepts two values (width and depth) and uses them to allocate memory in NewCMSketch(). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.19, 2.4.12, 2.6.14, and 2.8.2."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              }
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-190",
                  "description": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T15:38:54.859Z",
            "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
            "shortName": "GitHub_M"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/RedisBloom/RedisBloom/security/advisories/GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/RedisBloom/RedisBloom/security/advisories/GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "advisory": "GHSA-x5rx-rmq3-ff3h",
            "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
          },
          "title": "RedisBloom Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
        "cveId": "CVE-2024-55656",
        "datePublished": "2025-01-08T15:38:54.859Z",
        "dateReserved": "2024-12-10T14:48:24.296Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-08T15:52:23.554Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.