Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-46782 (GCVE-0-2024-46782)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-09-18 07:12 – Updated: 2026-05-11 20:36| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < 43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf
(git)
Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc (git) Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < 93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6 (git) Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673 (git) Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < 925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c (git) Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < 18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2 (git) Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < 47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4 (git) Affected: 7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd , < 031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
4.5
Unaffected: 0 , < 4.5 (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.322 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.284 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.226 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.167 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.110 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.51 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10.10 , ≤ 6.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.11 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T14:30:14.976916Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-10T13:18:35.725Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:18:26.768Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.322",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.284",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.226",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.167",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.110",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.51",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.322",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.284",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.226",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.167",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.110",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.51",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:36:22.752Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466"
}
],
"title": "ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-46782",
"datePublished": "2024-09-18T07:12:38.652Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-11T15:12:18.276Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:36:22.752Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-46782",
"date": "2026-09-18",
"epss": "0.00233",
"percentile": "0.14513"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-21T02:35:19.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-46782",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2024-46782",
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-01T07:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "5",
"product_status:known_affected": "5",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2024/msrc_cve-2024-46782.json",
"version": "3"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.322",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.284",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.226",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.167",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.110",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.51",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EAB8EA35-2061-4F7A-8F89-A75EBF6032D9",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.322",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6265A402-9C3C-438F-BFC5-4194B2568B85",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.284",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "864FC17C-501A-4823-A643-6F35D65D8A97",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.226",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "043405A4-25FE-45D4-A7BB-2A0C3B7D17C1",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.167",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6B1A95FC-7E7E-428B-BB59-F76640C652AE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.110",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E4529134-BAC4-4776-840B-304009E181A0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.51",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ACDEE48C-137A-4731-90D0-A675865E1BED",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B77A9280-37E6-49AD-B559-5B23A3B1DC3D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ila: llamar a nf_unregister_net_hooks() antes de que syzbot encuentre una lectura de uso posterior a la liberaci\u00f3n en ila_nf_input [1] El problema aqu\u00ed es que ila_xlat_exit_net() libera la tabla rhash y luego llama a nf_unregister_net_hooks(). Deber\u00eda hacerse de forma inversa, con unsynchronous_rcu(). Esta es una buena combinaci\u00f3n para un m\u00e9todo pre_exit(). [1] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [en l\u00ednea] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [en l\u00ednea] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [en l\u00ednea] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Lectura de tama\u00f1o 4 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff888064620008 por la tarea ksoftirqd/0/16 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 No contaminado 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Nombre del hardware: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Seguimiento de llamadas: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [en l\u00ednea] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [en l\u00ednea] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [en l\u00ednea] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [en l\u00ednea] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [en l\u00ednea] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [en l\u00ednea] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [en l\u00ednea] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [en l\u00ednea] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [en l\u00ednea] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [en l\u00ednea] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [en l\u00ednea] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 La direcci\u00f3n con errores pertenece a la p\u00e1gina f\u00edsica: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 \u00edndice:0x0 pfn:0x64620 indicadores: 0xfff00000000000(nodo=0|zona=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) tipo_p\u00e1gina: 0xbfffffff(amigo) sin procesar: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 sin procesar: 000000000000000 000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 p\u00e1gina volcada porque: kasan: se detect\u00f3 un acceso incorrecto page_owner rastrea la p\u00e1gina como liberada \u00faltima p\u00e1gina asignada mediante orden 3, migrantstype inamovible, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (ejecutor del sistema), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 establecer_propietario_de_p\u00e1gina include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [en l\u00ednea] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 preparar_nueva_p\u00e1gina mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [en l\u00ednea] obtener_p\u00e1gina_de_lista_libre+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [en l\u00ednea] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [en l\u00ednea] ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [en l\u00ednea] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [en l\u00ednea] ---truncado---"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:55:55.273",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T14:30:14.976916Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-18T08:15:05.577",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2025-11-21T14:26:31+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-46782",
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-18T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "198",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-46782.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:18:26.768Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T14:30:14.976916Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-29T14:30:19.311Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.322",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.284",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.226",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.167",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.110",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.51",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.322",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.284",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.226",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.167",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.110",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.51",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:34:10.865Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466"
}
],
"title": "ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-46782",
"datePublished": "2024-09-18T07:12:38.652Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-11T15:12:18.276Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:18:26.768Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-06-13 - Updated: 2025-06-13
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Confidential Computing Module | Confidential Computing Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Micro | SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Confidential Computing Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "Confidential Computing Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.0",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-06-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-06-13T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-06-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01901-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501901-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01894-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501894-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01892-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501892-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20387-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520387-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01873-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501873-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01930-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501930-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01932-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501932-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20388-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520388-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01927-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501927-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01908-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501908-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01918-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501918-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01928-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501928-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01843-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501843-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01875-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501875-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01922-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501922-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20382-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520382-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01853-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501853-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01851-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501851-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01929-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501929-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20389-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520389-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01899-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501899-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01840-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501840-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01849-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501849-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01893-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501893-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20383-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520383-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20384-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520384-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20381-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520381-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01844-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501844-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01919-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501919-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01839-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501839-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01935-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501935-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01869-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501869-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01868-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501868-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01907-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501907-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20386-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520386-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01906-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501906-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-06-20 - Updated: 2025-06-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.0 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP7 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Micro 6.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP7",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40364"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-06-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-06-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-06-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01951-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501951-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01995-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501995-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01964-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501964-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01948-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501948-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01958-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501958-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01982-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501982-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01944-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501944-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01972-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501972-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01950-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501950-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20413-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520413-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:02000-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502000-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20419-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520419-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01983-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501983-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20421-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520421-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01965-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501965-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01949-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501949-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:20408-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202520408-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01957-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501957-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01967-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501967-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01966-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501966-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-06-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01956-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501956-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-08-12 - Updated: 2025-08-12
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-46782
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-09-18 08:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:55| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html | ||
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7f00feaf107645d95a6d87e99b4d141ac0a08efd",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/ipv6/ila/ila.h",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_main.c",
"net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.5"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.5",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.322",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.284",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.226",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.167",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.110",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.51",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.10",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EAB8EA35-2061-4F7A-8F89-A75EBF6032D9",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.322",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6265A402-9C3C-438F-BFC5-4194B2568B85",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.284",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "864FC17C-501A-4823-A643-6F35D65D8A97",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.226",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "043405A4-25FE-45D4-A7BB-2A0C3B7D17C1",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.167",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6B1A95FC-7E7E-428B-BB59-F76640C652AE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.110",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E4529134-BAC4-4776-840B-304009E181A0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.51",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ACDEE48C-137A-4731-90D0-A675865E1BED",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B77A9280-37E6-49AD-B559-5B23A3B1DC3D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ila: llamar a nf_unregister_net_hooks() antes de que syzbot encuentre una lectura de uso posterior a la liberaci\u00f3n en ila_nf_input [1] El problema aqu\u00ed es que ila_xlat_exit_net() libera la tabla rhash y luego llama a nf_unregister_net_hooks(). Deber\u00eda hacerse de forma inversa, con unsynchronous_rcu(). Esta es una buena combinaci\u00f3n para un m\u00e9todo pre_exit(). [1] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [en l\u00ednea] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [en l\u00ednea] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [en l\u00ednea] ERROR: KASAN: use after free en rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Lectura de tama\u00f1o 4 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff888064620008 por la tarea ksoftirqd/0/16 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 No contaminado 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Nombre del hardware: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Seguimiento de llamadas: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [en l\u00ednea] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [en l\u00ednea] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [en l\u00ednea] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [en l\u00ednea] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [en l\u00ednea] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [en l\u00ednea] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [en l\u00ednea] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [en l\u00ednea] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [en l\u00ednea] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [en l\u00ednea] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [en l\u00ednea] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 La direcci\u00f3n con errores pertenece a la p\u00e1gina f\u00edsica: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 \u00edndice:0x0 pfn:0x64620 indicadores: 0xfff00000000000(nodo=0|zona=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) tipo_p\u00e1gina: 0xbfffffff(amigo) sin procesar: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 sin procesar: 000000000000000 000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 p\u00e1gina volcada porque: kasan: se detect\u00f3 un acceso incorrecto page_owner rastrea la p\u00e1gina como liberada \u00faltima p\u00e1gina asignada mediante orden 3, migrantstype inamovible, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (ejecutor del sistema), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 establecer_propietario_de_p\u00e1gina include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [en l\u00ednea] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 preparar_nueva_p\u00e1gina mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [en l\u00ednea] obtener_p\u00e1gina_de_lista_libre+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [en l\u00ednea] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [en l\u00ednea] ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [en l\u00ednea] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [en l\u00ednea] ---truncado---"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:55:55.273",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-46782",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-29T14:30:14.976916Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-18T08:15:05.577",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-9F66-CV49-738X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-18 09:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner
syzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]
Issue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable, then call nf_unregister_net_hooks().
It should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().
This is a good match for a pre_exit() method.
[1] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620 flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy) raw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as freed page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline] kmalloclarge_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline] rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071 ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613 ops_ini ---truncated---
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46782"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-18T08:15:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---",
"id": "GHSA-9f66-cv49-738x",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:31:29Z",
"published": "2024-09-18T09:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/031ae72825cef43e4650140b800ad58bf7a6a466"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18a5a16940464b301ea91bf5da3a324aedb347b2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43d34110882b97ba1ec66cc8234b18983efb9abf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47abd8adddbc0aecb8f231269ef659148d5dabe4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925c18a7cff93d8a4320d652351294ff7d0ac93c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93ee345ba349922834e6a9d1dadabaedcc12dce6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda4d84ac0d5421b346faee720011f58bdb99673"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaf4e2216824839d26727a15b638c6a677bd9fc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-25-226-07
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00MSRC_CVE-2024-46782
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2024-09-01 07:00 - Updated: 2026-02-21 02:35OESA-2024-2325 (CVE-2023-52917)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-11-01 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() The debugfs_create_dir() function returns error pointers. It never returns NULL. So use IS_ERR() to check it.(CVE-2023-52917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: pci: cx23885: check cx23885_vdev_init() return cx23885_vdev_init() can return a NULL pointer, but that pointer is used in the next line without a check. Add a NULL pointer check and go to the error unwind if it is NULL.(CVE-2023-52918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks
We previously would call btrfs_check_leaf() if we had the check integrity code enabled, which meant that we could only run the extended leaf checks if we had WRITTEN set on the header flags.
This leaves a gap in our checking, because we could end up with corruption on disk where WRITTEN isn't set on the leaf, and then the extended leaf checks don't get run which we rely on to validate all of the item pointers to make sure we don't access memory outside of the extent buffer.
However, since 732fab95abe2 ("btrfs: check-integrity: remove CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY option") we no longer call btrfs_check_leaf() from btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), which means we only ever call it on blocks that are being written out, and thus have WRITTEN set, or that are being read in, which should have WRITTEN set.
Add checks to make sure we have WRITTEN set appropriately, and then make sure __btrfs_check_leaf() always does the item checking. This will protect us from file systems that have been corrupted and no longer have WRITTEN set on some of the blocks.
This was hit on a crafted image tweaking the WRITTEN bit and reported by KASAN as out-of-bound access in the eb accessors. The example is a dir item at the end of an eb.
[2.042] BTRFS warning (device loop1): bad eb member start: ptr 0x3fff start 30572544 member offset 16410 size 2 [2.040] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [2.537] KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000018-0x000508800000001f] [2.729] CPU: 0 PID: 2587 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 [2.729] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [2.621] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] RSP: 0018:ffff88810871fab8 EFLAGS: 00000206 [2.621] RAX: 0000a11000000003 RBX: ffff888104ff8720 RCX: ffff88811b2288c0 [2.621] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff81dd8aca RDI: ffff88810871f748 [2.621] RBP: 000000000000401a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10210e3ee9 [2.621] R10: ffff88810871f74f R11: 205d323430333737 R12: 000000000000001a [2.621] R13: 000508800000001a R14: 1ffff110210e3f5d R15: ffffffff850011e8 [2.621] FS: 00007f56ea275840(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [2.621] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [2.621] CR2: 00007febd13b75c0 CR3: 000000010bb50000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [2.621] Call Trace: [2.621] <TASK> [2.621] ? show_regs+0x74/0x80 [2.621] ? die_addr+0x46/0xc0 [2.621] ? exc_general_protection+0x161/0x2a0 [2.621] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0 [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_get_16+0x10/0x10 [2.621] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_match_dir_item_name+0x101/0x1a0 [2.621] btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x1f3/0x280 [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x10/0x10 [2.621] btrfs_get_tree+0xd25/0x1910
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: ISO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
Check user input length before copying data.(CVE-2024-35964)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/arm-smmu: Use the correct type in nvidia_smmu_context_fault()
This was missed because of the function pointer indirection.
nvidia_smmu_context_fault() is also installed as a irq function, and the 'void *' was changed to a struct arm_smmu_domain. Since the iommu_domain is embedded at a non-zero offset this causes nvidia_smmu_context_fault() to miscompute the offset. Fixup the types.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000120 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000107c9f000 [0000000000000120] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 47 Comm: kworker/u25:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-0.rc7.58.eln136.aarch64 #1 Hardware name: Unknown NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX/NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX, BIOS 3.1-32827747 03/19/2023 Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func pstate: 604000c9 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : nvidia_smmu_context_fault+0x1c/0x158 lr : __free_irq+0x1d4/0x2e8 sp : ffff80008044b6f0 x29: ffff80008044b6f0 x28: ffff000080a60b18 x27: ffffd32b5172e970 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000802f5aac x24: ffff0000802f5a30 x23: ffff0000802f5b60 x22: 0000000000000057 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffff0000802f5a00 x19: ffff000087d4cd80 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: 6234362066666666 x16: 6630303078302d30 x15: ffff00008156d888 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff0000801db910 x12: ffff00008156d6d0 x11: 0000000000000003 x10: ffff0000801db918 x9 : ffffd32b50f94d9c x8 : 1fffe0001032fda1 x7 : ffff00008197ed00 x6 : 000000000000000f x5 : 000000000000010e x4 : 000000000000010e x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffd32b51720cd8 x1 : ffff000087e6f700 x0 : 0000000000000057 Call trace: nvidia_smmu_context_fault+0x1c/0x158 __free_irq+0x1d4/0x2e8 free_irq+0x3c/0x80 devm_free_irq+0x64/0xa8 arm_smmu_domain_free+0xc4/0x158 iommu_domain_free+0x44/0xa0 iommu_deinit_device+0xd0/0xf8 __iommu_group_remove_device+0xcc/0xe0 iommu_bus_notifier+0x64/0xa8 notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x148 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x90 bus_notify+0x44/0x70 device_del+0x264/0x3e8 pci_remove_bus_device+0x84/0x120 pci_remove_root_bus+0x5c/0xc0 dw_pcie_host_deinit+0x38/0xe0 tegra_pcie_config_rp+0xc0/0x1f0 tegra_pcie_dw_probe+0x34c/0x700 platform_probe+0x70/0xe8 really_probe+0xc8/0x3a0 __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130 __device_attach_driver+0xc4/0x170 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0x100 __device_attach+0xa8/0x1c8 device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x30 bus_probe_device+0xb0/0xc0 deferred_probe_work_func+0xbc/0x120 process_one_work+0x194/0x490 worker_thread+0x284/0x3b0 kthread+0xf4/0x108 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: a9b97bfd 910003fd a9025bf5 f85a0035 (b94122a1)(CVE-2024-36884)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dev/parport: fix the array out-of-bounds risk
Fixed array out-of-bounds issues caused by sprintf by replacing it with snprintf for safer data copying, ensuring the destination buffer is not overflowed.
Below is the stack trace I encountered during the actual issue:
[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4]Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport] [ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,5]CPU: 4 PID: 5118 Comm: QThread Tainted: G S W O 5.10.97-arm64-desktop #7100.57021.2 [ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,6]TGID: 5087 Comm: EFileApp [ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,7]Hardware name: HUAWEI HUAWEI QingYun PGUX-W515x-B081/SP1PANGUXM, BIOS 1.00.07 04/29/2024 [ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,8]Call trace: [ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,9] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0 [ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,0] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,1] dump_stack+0xd4/0x10c [ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,2] panic+0x1d8/0x3bc [ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,3] __stack_chk_fail+0x2c/0x38 [ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4] do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 parport
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diFree(CVE-2024-43858)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau: prime: fix refcount underflow
Calling nouveau_bo_ref() on a nouveau_bo without initializing it (and hence the backing ttm_bo) leads to a refcount underflow.
Instead of calling nouveau_bo_ref() in the unwind path of drm_gem_object_init(), clean things up manually.
(cherry picked from commit 1b93f3e89d03cfc576636e195466a0d728ad8de5)(CVE-2024-43867)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
devres: Fix memory leakage caused by driver API devm_free_percpu()
It will cause memory leakage when use driver API devm_free_percpu() to free memory allocated by devm_alloc_percpu(), fixed by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within devm_free_percpu().(CVE-2024-43871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dpu: cleanup FB if dpu_format_populate_layout fails
If the dpu_format_populate_layout() fails, then FB is prepared, but not cleaned up. This ends up leaking the pin_count on the GEM object and causes a splat during DRM file closure:
msm_obj->pin_count WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 569 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:121 update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc [...] Call trace: update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc put_pages+0xac/0x100 msm_gem_free_object+0x138/0x180 drm_gem_object_free+0x1c/0x30 drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked+0x108/0x10c drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x58/0x70 idr_for_each+0x68/0xec drm_gem_release+0x28/0x40 drm_file_free+0x174/0x234 drm_release+0xb0/0x160 __fput+0xc0/0x2c8 __fput_sync+0x50/0x5c __arm64_sys_close+0x38/0x7c invoke_syscall+0x48/0x118 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x4c/0x120 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 irq event stamp: 129818 hardirqs last enabled at (129817): [<ffffa5f6d953fcc0>] console_unlock+0x118/0x124 hardirqs last disabled at (129818): [<ffffa5f6da7dcf04>] el1_dbg+0x24/0x8c softirqs last enabled at (129808): [<ffffa5f6d94afc18>] handle_softirqs+0x4c8/0x4e8 softirqs last disabled at (129785): [<ffffa5f6d94105e4>] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/600714/(CVE-2024-44982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ethernet: mtk_wed: fix use-after-free panic in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb()
When there are multiple ap interfaces on one band and with WED on, turning the interface down will cause a kernel panic on MT798X.
Previously, cb_priv was freed in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block() without marking NULL,and mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb() didn't check the value, too.
Assign NULL after free cb_priv in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block() and check NULL in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb().
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0072460bca32b4f5 Call trace: mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb+0x4/0x38 0xffffffc0794084bc tcf_block_playback_offloads+0x70/0x1e8 tcf_block_unbind+0x6c/0xc8 ... ---------(CVE-2024-44997)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: dwc3: core: Prevent USB core invalid event buffer address access
This commit addresses an issue where the USB core could access an invalid event buffer address during runtime suspend, potentially causing SMMU faults and other memory issues in Exynos platforms. The problem arises from the following sequence. 1. In dwc3_gadget_suspend, there is a chance of a timeout when moving the USB core to the halt state after clearing the run/stop bit by software. 2. In dwc3_core_exit, the event buffer is cleared regardless of the USB core's status, which may lead to an SMMU faults and other memory issues. if the USB core tries to access the event buffer address.
To prevent this hardware quirk on Exynos platforms, this commit ensures that the event buffer address is not cleared by software when the USB core is active during runtime suspend by checking its status before clearing the buffer address.(CVE-2024-46675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gtp: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference
When sockfd_lookup() fails, gtp_encap_enable_socket() returns a NULL pointer, but its callers only check for error pointers thus miss the NULL pointer case.
Fix it by returning an error pointer with the error code carried from sockfd_lookup().
(I found this bug during code inspection.)(CVE-2024-46677)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix out-of-bounds read of df_v1_7_channel_number
Check the fb_channel_number range to avoid the array out-of-bounds read error(CVE-2024-46724)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix Null pointer dereference in btnxpuart_flush()
This adds a check before freeing the rx->skb in flush and close functions to handle the kernel crash seen while removing driver after FW download fails or before FW download completes.
dmesg log: [ 54.634586] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000080 [ 54.643398] Mem abort info: [ 54.646204] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 54.649964] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 54.655286] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 54.658348] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 54.661498] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 54.666391] Data abort info: [ 54.669273] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 54.674768] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 54.674771] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 54.674775] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000048860000 [ 54.674780] [0000000000000080] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 54.703880] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 54.710152] Modules linked in: btnxpuart(-) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce polyval_generic snd_soc_imx_spdif snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_ak5558 snd_soc_ak4458 caam secvio error snd_soc_fsl_micfil snd_soc_fsl_spdif snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma gpio_ir_recv rc_core sch_fq_codel fuse [ 54.744357] CPU: 3 PID: 72 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 6.6.3-otbr-g128004619037 #2 [ 54.744364] Hardware name: FSL i.MX8MM EVK board (DT) [ 54.744368] Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [ 54.757244] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 54.757249] pc : kfree_skb_reason+0x18/0xb0 [ 54.772299] lr : btnxpuart_flush+0x40/0x58 [btnxpuart] [ 54.782921] sp : ffff8000805ebca0 [ 54.782923] x29: ffff8000805ebca0 x28: ffffa5c6cf1869c0 x27: ffffa5c6cf186000 [ 54.782931] x26: ffff377b84852400 x25: ffff377b848523c0 x24: ffff377b845e7230 [ 54.782938] x23: ffffa5c6ce8dbe08 x22: ffffa5c6ceb65410 x21: 00000000ffffff92 [ 54.782945] x20: ffffa5c6ce8dbe98 x19: ffffffffffffffac x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 54.807651] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffa5c6ce2824ec x15: ffff8001005eb857 [ 54.821917] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffffa5c6cf1a02e0 x12: 0000000000000642 [ 54.821924] x11: 0000000000000040 x10: ffffa5c6cf19d690 x9 : ffffa5c6cf19d688 [ 54.821931] x8 : ffff377b86000028 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 54.821938] x5 : ffff377b86000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 54.843331] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffffffffffffac [ 54.857599] Call trace: [ 54.857601] kfree_skb_reason+0x18/0xb0 [ 54.863878] btnxpuart_flush+0x40/0x58 [btnxpuart] [ 54.863888] hci_dev_open_sync+0x3a8/0xa04 [ 54.872773] hci_power_on+0x54/0x2e4 [ 54.881832] process_one_work+0x138/0x260 [ 54.881842] worker_thread+0x32c/0x438 [ 54.881847] kthread+0x118/0x11c [ 54.881853] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 54.896406] Code: a9be7bfd 910003fd f9000bf3 aa0003f3 (b940d400) [ 54.896410] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-46749)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (nct6775-core) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large negative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user. Fix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46757)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Validate function returns
[WHAT & HOW] Function return values must be checked before data can be used in subsequent functions.
This fixes 4 CHECKED_RETURN issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46775)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner
syzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]
Issue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable, then call nf_unregister_net_hooks().
It should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().
This is a good match for a pre_exit() method.
[1] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620 flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy) raw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as freed page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline] kmalloclarge_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline] rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071 ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613 ops_ini ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: added NULL check at start of dc_validate_stream
[Why] prevent invalid memory access
[How] check if dc and stream are NULL(CVE-2024-46802)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: nxp-fspi: fix the KASAN report out-of-bounds bug
Change the memcpy length to fix the out-of-bounds issue when writing the data that is not 4 byte aligned to TX FIFO.
To reproduce the issue, write 3 bytes data to NOR chip.
dd if=3b of=/dev/mtd0 [ 36.926103] ================================================================== [ 36.933409] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838 [ 36.940514] Read of size 4 at addr ffff00081037c2a0 by task dd/455 [ 36.946721] [ 36.948235] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 455 Comm: dd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-gc7b0e37c8434 #1070 [ 36.956185] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QM MEK (DT) [ 36.961260] Call trace: [ 36.963723] dump_backtrace+0x90/0xe8 [ 36.967414] show_stack+0x18/0x24 [ 36.970749] dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90 [ 36.974451] print_report+0x114/0x5cc [ 36.978151] kasan_report+0xa4/0xf0 [ 36.981670] __asan_report_load_n_noabort+0x1c/0x28 [ 36.986587] nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838 [ 36.990800] spi_mem_exec_op+0x8ec/0xd30 [ 36.994762] spi_mem_no_dirmap_read+0x190/0x1e0 [ 36.999323] spi_mem_dirmap_write+0x238/0x32c [ 37.003710] spi_nor_write_data+0x220/0x374 [ 37.007932] spi_nor_write+0x110/0x2e8 [ 37.011711] mtd_write_oob_std+0x154/0x1f0 [ 37.015838] mtd_write_oob+0x104/0x1d0 [ 37.019617] mtd_write+0xb8/0x12c [ 37.022953] mtdchar_write+0x224/0x47c [ 37.026732] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8 [ 37.030163] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0 [ 37.033586] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c [ 37.037539] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 [ 37.041327] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c [ 37.046244] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c [ 37.049589] el0_svc+0x38/0x78 [ 37.052681] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 37.057077] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 37.060775] [ 37.062274] Allocated by task 455: [ 37.065701] kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54 [ 37.069570] kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c [ 37.073438] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x40/0x54 [ 37.077736] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb8 [ 37.081515] __kmalloc_noprof+0x158/0x2f8 [ 37.085563] mtd_kmalloc_up_to+0x120/0x154 [ 37.089690] mtdchar_write+0x130/0x47c [ 37.093469] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8 [ 37.096901] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0 [ 37.100332] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c [ 37.104287] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 [ 37.108064] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c [ 37.112972] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c [ 37.116319] el0_svc+0x38/0x78 [ 37.119401] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 37.123788] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 37.127474] [ 37.128977] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff00081037c2a0 [ 37.128977] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 [ 37.141177] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of [ 37.141177] allocated 3-byte region [ffff00081037c2a0, ffff00081037c2a3) [ 37.153465] [ 37.154971] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 37.160559] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x89037c [ 37.168596] flags: 0xbfffe0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) [ 37.175149] page_type: 0xfdffffff(slab) [ 37.179021] raw: 0bfffe0000000000 ffff000800002500 dead000000000122 0000000000000000 [ 37.186788] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080800080 00000001fdffffff 0000000000000000 [ 37.194553] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 37.200144] [ 37.201647] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 37.206460] ffff00081037c180: fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc [ 37.213701] ffff00081037c200: fa fc fc fc 05 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc 02 fc fc fc [ 37.220946] >ffff00081037c280: 06 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 37.228186] ^ [ 37.232473] ffff00081037c300: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 37.239718] ffff00081037c380: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 37.246962] ============================================================== ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Correct the defined value for AMDGPU_DMUB_NOTIFICATION_MAX
[Why & How] It actually exposes '6' types in enum dmub_notification_type. Not 5. Using smaller number to create array dmub_callback & dmub_thread_offload has potential to access item out of array bound. Fix it.(CVE-2024-46871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling
Currently, Smack mirrors the label of incoming tcp/ipv4 connections: when a label 'foo' connects to a label 'bar' with tcp/ipv4, 'foo' always gets 'foo' in returned ipv4 packets. So, 1) returned packets are incorrectly labeled ('foo' instead of 'bar') 2) 'bar' can write to 'foo' without being authorized to write.
Here is a scenario how to see this:
-
Take two machines, let's call them C and S, with active Smack in the default state (no settings, no rules, no labeled hosts, only builtin labels)
-
At S, add Smack rule 'foo bar w' (labels 'foo' and 'bar' are instantiated at S at this moment)
-
At S, at label 'bar', launch a program that listens for incoming tcp/ipv4 connections
-
From C, at label 'foo', connect to the listener at S. (label 'foo' is instantiated at C at this moment) Connection succeedes and works.
-
Send some data in both directions.
- Collect network traffic of this connection.
All packets in both directions are labeled with the CIPSO of the label 'foo'. Hence, label 'bar' writes to 'foo' without being authorized, and even without ever being known at C.
If anybody cares: exactly the same happens with DCCP.
This behavior 1st manifested in release 2.6.29.4 (see Fixes below) and it looks unintentional. At least, no explanation was provided.
I changed returned packes label into the 'bar', to bring it into line with the Smack documentation claims.(CVE-2024-47659)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fsnotify: clear PARENT_WATCHED flags lazily
In some setups directories can have many (usually negative) dentries. Hence __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() function can take a significant amount of time. Since the bulk of this function happens under inode->i_lock this causes a significant contention on the lock when we remove the watch from the directory as the __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() call from fsnotify_recalc_mask() races with __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() calls from __fsnotify_parent() happening on children. This can lead upto softlockup reports reported by users.
Fix the problem by calling fsnotify_update_children_dentry_flags() to set PARENT_WATCHED flags only when parent starts watching children.
When parent stops watching children, clear false positive PARENT_WATCHED flags lazily in __fsnotify_parent() for each accessed child.(CVE-2024-47660)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t
[WHAT & HOW] dmub_rb_cmd's ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned 0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.
This fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: keystone: Add workaround for Errata #i2037 (AM65x SR 1.0)
Errata #i2037 in AM65x/DRA80xM Processors Silicon Revision 1.0 (SPRZ452D_July 2018_Revised December 2019 [1]) mentions when an inbound PCIe TLP spans more than two internal AXI 128-byte bursts, the bus may corrupt the packet payload and the corrupt data may cause associated applications or the processor to hang.
The workaround for Errata #i2037 is to limit the maximum read request size and maximum payload size to 128 bytes. Add workaround for Errata #i2037 here.
The errata and workaround is applicable only to AM65x SR 1.0 and later versions of the silicon will have this fixed.
[1] -> https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz452i/sprz452i.pdf(CVE-2024-47667)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: mt7996: fix NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he Fix the NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he routine adding an sta interface to the mt7996 driver. Found by code review.(CVE-2024-47681)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Skip Recompute DSC Params if no Stream on Link [why] Encounter NULL pointer dereference uner mst + dsc setup. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 4 PID: 917 Comm: sway Not tainted 6.3.9-arch1-1 #1 124dc55df4f5272ccb409f39ef4872fc2b3376a2 Hardware name: LENOVO 20NKS01Y00/20NKS01Y00, BIOS R12ET61W(1.31 ) 07/28/2022 RIP: 0010:drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper] Code: 01 00 00 48 8b 85 60 05 00 00 48 63 80 88 00 00 00 3b 43 28 0f 8d 2e 01 00 00 48 8b 53 30 48 8d 04 80 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 40 18 <48> 8> RSP: 0018:ffff960cc2df77d8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8afb87e81280 RCX: 0000000000000224 RDX: ffff8afb9ee37c00 RSI: ffff8afb8da1a578 RDI: ffff8afb87e81280 RBP: ffff8afb83d67000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8afb9652f850 R10: ffff960cc2df7908 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff8afb8d7688a0 R14: ffff8afb8da1a578 R15: 0000000000000224 FS: 00007f4dac35ce00(0000) GS:ffff8afe30b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000010ddc6000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0 ? plist_add+0xbe/0x100 ? exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026] ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x28/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026] compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_link+0x2ff/0xa40 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] ? fill_plane_buffer_attributes+0x419/0x510 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_state+0x1e1/0x250 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0xecd/0x1190 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] drm_atomic_check_only+0x5c5/0xa40 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x76e/0xbc0 [how] dsc recompute should be skipped if no mode change detected on the new request. If detected, keep checking whether the stream is already on current state or not.(CVE-2024-47683)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: check skb is non-NULL in tcp_rto_delta_us() We have some machines running stock Ubuntu 20.04.6 which is their 5.4.0-174-generic kernel that are running ceph and recently hit a null ptr dereference in tcp_rearm_rto(). Initially hitting it from the TLP path, but then later we also saw it getting hit from the RACK case as well. Here are examples of the oops messages we saw in each of those cases: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.780353] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.787572] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.792971] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.798362] PGD 0 P4D 0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.801164] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.805091] CPU: 0 PID: 9180 Comm: msgr-worker-1 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-174-generic #193-Ubuntu Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.814996] Hardware name: Supermicro SMC 2x26 os-gen8 64C NVME-Y 256G/H12SSW-NTR, BIOS 2.5.V1.2U.NVMe.UEFI 05/09/2023 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.825952] RIP: 0010:tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.830656] Code: 87 ca 04 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 c3 49 8b bc 24 40 06 00 00 eb 8d 48 bb cf f7 53 e3 a5 9b c4 20 4c 89 ef e8 0c fe 0e 00 <48> 8b 78 20 48 c1 ef 03 48 89 f8 41 8b bc 24 80 04 00 00 48 f7 e3 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.849665] RSP: 0018:ffffb75d40003e08 EFLAGS: 00010246 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.855149] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 20c49ba5e353f7cf RCX: 0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.862542] RDX: 0000000062177c30 RSI: 000000000000231c RDI: ffff9874ad283a60 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.869933] RBP: ffffb75d40003e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff987605e20aa8 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.877318] R10: ffffb75d40003f00 R11: ffffb75d4460f740 R12: ffff9874ad283900 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.884710] R13: ffff9874ad283a60 R14: ffff9874ad283980 R15: ffff9874ad283d30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.892095] FS: 00007f1ef4a2e700(0000) GS:ffff987605e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.900438] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.906435] CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000003e450ba003 CR4: 0000000000760ef0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.913822] PKRU: 55555554 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.916786] Call Trace: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.919488] Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.921765] ? show_regs.cold+0x1a/0x1f Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.925859] ? __die+0x90/0xd9 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.929169] ? no_context+0x196/0x380 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.933088] ? ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4e0/0x4e0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.938216] ? ip6_sublist_rcv_finish+0x3d/0x50 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.943000] ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x50/0x1a0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.947873] ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x20 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.952486] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x267/0x450 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.957104] ? ipv6_list_rcv+0x112/0x140 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.961279] ? __do_page_fault+0x58/0x90 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.965458] ? do_page_fault+0x2c/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.969465] ? page_fault+0x34/0x40 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.973217] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.977313] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.981408] tcp_send_loss_probe+0x10b/0x220 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.985937] tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1b4/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.990809] tcp_write_timer+0x9e/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.994814] ? tcp_write_timer_handler+0x240/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.999866] call_timer_fn+0x32/0x130 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.003782] __run_timers.part.0+0x180/0x280 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.008309] ? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.012841] ? native_x2apic_icr_write+0x30/0x30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.017718] ? lapic_next_even ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47684)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject_ipv6: fix nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() syzbot reported that nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() was possibly sending garbage on the four reserved tcp bits (th->res1) Use skb_put_zero() to clear the whole TCP header, as done in nf_reject_ip_tcphdr_put() BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x4ad/0xa50 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xe7/0x980 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa5a/0x19b0 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x1ce/0x800 kernel/softirq.c:554 __do_softirq+0x14/0x1a kernel/softirq.c:588 do_softirq+0x9a/0x100 kernel/softirq.c:455 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9f/0xb0 kernel/softirq.c:382 local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline] rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2692/0x5610 net/core/dev.c:4450 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline] neigh_resolve_output+0x9ca/0xae0 net/core/neighbour.c:1565 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x2347/0x2ba0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:141 __ip6_finish_output net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215 [inline] ip6_finish_output+0xbb8/0x14b0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:226 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip6_output+0x356/0x620 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:247 dst_output include/net/dst.h:450 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0x1ba6/0x25d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:366 inet6_csk_xmit+0x442/0x530 net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c:135 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x3b07/0x4880 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1484 [inline] tcp_connect+0x35b6/0x7130 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4143 tcp_v6_connect+0x1bcc/0x1e40 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:333 __inet_stream_connect+0x2ef/0x1730 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:679 inet_stream_connect+0x6a/0xd0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:750 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2061 [inline] __sys_connect+0x606/0x690 net/socket.c:2078 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2088 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2085 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x91/0xe0 net/socket.c:2085 x64_sys_call+0x27a5/0x3ba0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:43 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was stored to memory at: nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x60c/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:249 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47685)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error() syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Workqueue: events destroy_super_work RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 Call Trace: percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42 destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below race condition causes this bug: - freeze_super() - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY - thaw_super - thaw_super_locked - sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - deactivate_locked_super Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option: - set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped - record errors to superblock - set SB_RDONLY falg Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not set SB_RDONLY flag, let's remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz(CVE-2024-47689)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: return -EINVAL when namelen is 0 When we have a corrupted main.sqlite in /var/lib/nfs/nfsdcld/, it may result in namelen being 0, which will cause memdup_user() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. When we access the name.data that has been assigned the value of ZERO_SIZE_PTR in nfs4_client_to_reclaim(), null pointer dereference is triggered. [ T1205] ================================================================== [ T1205] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] Read of size 1 at addr 0000000000000010 by task nfsdcld/1205 [ T1205] [ T1205] CPU: 11 PID: 1205 Comm: nfsdcld Not tainted 5.10.0-00003-g2c1423731b8d #406 [ T1205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ T1205] Call Trace: [ T1205] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] __kasan_report.cold+0x34/0x84 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 [ T1205] nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_release_lockowner+0x410/0x410 [ T1205] cld_pipe_downcall+0x5ca/0x760 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ T1205] ? down_write_killable_nested+0x170/0x170 [ T1205] ? avc_policy_seqno+0x28/0x40 [ T1205] ? selinux_file_permission+0x1b4/0x1e0 [ T1205] rpc_pipe_write+0x84/0xb0 [ T1205] vfs_write+0x143/0x520 [ T1205] ksys_write+0xc9/0x170 [ T1205] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xfe/0x110 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa2/0x110 [ T1205] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ T1205] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 [ T1205] RIP: 0033:0x7fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 514 [ T1205] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c4b7248 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000042b RCX: 00007fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] RDX: 000000000000042b RSI: 00007fff8c4b75f0 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ T1205] RBP: 00007fdbdb761bb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000042b [ T1205] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 00007fff8c4b75f0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ T1205] ================================================================== Fix it by checking namelen.(CVE-2024-47692)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-clt: Reset cid to con_num - 1 to stay in bounds In the function init_conns(), after the create_con() and create_cm() for loop if something fails. In the cleanup for loop after the destroy tag, we access out of bound memory because cid is set to clt_path->s.con_num. This commits resets the cid to clt_path->s.con_num - 1, to stay in bounds in the cleanup loop later.(CVE-2024-47695)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2832: fix an out-of-bounds write error Ensure index in rtl2832_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access. dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue. hverkuil: added fixes tag, rtl2830_pid_filter -> rtl2832_pid_filter in logmsg
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: bcm: Clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry(). syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has been unregistered. However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the remaining bo->bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() in bcm_release(). Let's clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). [0] name '4986' WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 </TASK>(CVE-2024-47709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sock_map: Add a cond_resched() in sock_hash_free() Several syzbot soft lockup reports all have in common sock_hash_free() If a map with a large number of buckets is destroyed, we need to yield the cpu when needed.(CVE-2024-47710)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for set_output_gamma in dcn30_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn30_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for nullity at line 386, but then it was being dereferenced without any nullity check at line 401. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is indeed null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a nullity check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 401. If set_output_gamma is null, we log an error message and do not call the function. This fix prevents a potential null pointer dereference error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c:401 dcn30_set_output_transfer_func() error: we previously assumed 'mpc->funcs->set_output_gamma' could be null (see line 386) drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c 373 bool dcn30_set_output_transfer_func(struct dc dc, 374 struct pipe_ctx pipe_ctx, 375 const struct dc_stream_state stream) 376 { 377 int mpcc_id = pipe_ctx->plane_res.hubp->inst; 378 struct mpc mpc = pipe_ctx->stream_res.opp->ctx->dc->res_pool->mpc; 379 const struct pwl_params params = NULL; 380 bool ret = false; 381 382 / program OGAM or 3DLUT only for the top pipe/ 383 if (pipe_ctx->top_pipe == NULL) { 384 /program rmu shaper and 3dlut in MPC/ 385 ret = dcn30_set_mpc_shaper_3dlut(pipe_ctx, stream); 386 if (ret == false && mpc->funcs->set_output_gamma) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If this is NULL 387 if (stream->out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_HWPWL) 388 params = &stream->out_transfer_func.pwl; 389 else if (pipe_ctx->stream->out_transfer_func.type == 390 TF_TYPE_DISTRIBUTED_POINTS && 391 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format( 392 &stream->out_transfer_func, 393 &mpc->blender_params, false)) 394 params = &mpc->blender_params; 395 / there are no ROM LUTs in OUTGAM */ 396 if (stream->out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_PREDEFINED) 397 BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER(); 398 } 399 } 400 --> 401 mpc->funcs->set_output_gamma(mpc, mpcc_id, params); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Then it will crash 402 return ret; 403 }(CVE-2024-47720)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: call cache_put if xdr_reserve_space returns NULL If not enough buffer space available, but idmap_lookup has triggered lookup_fn which calls cache_get and returns successfully. Then we missed to call cache_put here which pairs with cache_get. Reviwed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>(CVE-2024-47737)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key() In find_asymmetric_key(), if all NULLs are passed in the id_{0,1,2} arguments, the kernel will first emit WARN but then have an oops because id_2 gets dereferenced anyway. Add the missing id_2 check and move WARN_ON() to the final else branch to avoid duplicate NULL checks. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static analysis tool.(CVE-2024-47743)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix potential oob read in nilfs_btree_check_delete() The function nilfs_btree_check_delete(), which checks whether degeneration to direct mapping occurs before deleting a b-tree entry, causes memory access outside the block buffer when retrieving the maximum key if the root node has no entries. This does not usually happen because b-tree mappings with 0 child nodes are never created by mkfs.nilfs2 or nilfs2 itself. However, it can happen if the b-tree root node read from a device is configured that way, so fix this potential issue by adding a check for that case.(CVE-2024-47757)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nbd: fix race between timeout and normal completion If request timetout is handled by nbd_requeue_cmd(), normal completion has to be stopped for avoiding to complete this requeued request, other use-after-free can be triggered. Fix the race by clearing NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT in nbd_requeue_cmd(), meantime make sure that cmd->lock is grabbed for clearing the flag and the requeue.(CVE-2024-49855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing There is another found exception that the "timerlat/1" thread was scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally: ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x7c/0x110 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0 ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10 __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150 hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60 timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0 ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration of the "timerlat/1" thread was performed during thread creation. Further analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU: T1 | T2 [CPUHP_ONLINE] | cpu_device_down() osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | | cpus_write_lock() | takedown_cpu(1) | cpus_write_unlock() [CPUHP_OFFLINE] | cpus_read_lock() | start_kthread(1) | cpus_read_unlock() | To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.(CVE-2024-49866)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: wait for fixup workers before stopping cleaner kthread during umount During unmount, at close_ctree(), we have the following steps in this order: 1) Park the cleaner kthread - this doesn't destroy the kthread, it basically halts its execution (wake ups against it work but do nothing); 2) We stop the cleaner kthread - this results in freeing the respective struct task_struct; 3) We call btrfs_stop_all_workers() which waits for any jobs running in all the work queues and then free the work queues. Syzbot reported a case where a fixup worker resulted in a crash when doing a delayed iput on its inode while attempting to wake up the cleaner at btrfs_add_delayed_iput(), because the task_struct of the cleaner kthread was already freed. This can happen during unmount because we don't wait for any fixup workers still running before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner kthread, which stops and free all its resources. Fix this by waiting for any fixup workers at close_ctree() before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner and run pending delayed iputs. The stack traces reported by syzbot were the following: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880272a8a18 by task kworker/u8:3/52 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Workqueue: btrfs-fixup btrfs_work_helper Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 class_raw_spinlock_irqsave_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:551 [inline] try_to_wake_up+0xb0/0x1480 kernel/sched/core.c:4154 btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker+0xc16/0xdf0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:2842 btrfs_work_helper+0x390/0xc50 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:314 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa63/0x1850 kernel/workqueue.c:3310 worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3391 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Allocated by task 2: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:319 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x66/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:345 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:247 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4086 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4135 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x16b/0x320 mm/slub.c:4187 alloc_task_struct_node kernel/fork.c:180 [inline] dup_task_struct+0x57/0x8c0 kernel/fork.c:1107 copy_process+0x5d1/0x3d50 kernel/fork.c:2206 kernel_clone+0x223/0x880 kernel/fork.c:2787 kernel_thread+0x1bc/0x240 kernel/fork.c:2849 create_kthread kernel/kthread.c:412 [inline] kthreadd+0x60d/0x810 kernel/kthread.c:765 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 Freed by task 61: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:247 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x59/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:264 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:230 [inline] slab_free_h ---truncated---(CVE-2024-49867)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion [BUG] Syzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676 prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642 relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678 ... BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667] RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926 Call Trace: <TASK> commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430 del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline] reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742 btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [CAUSE] The allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside prepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call unset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info->balance_ctl to be NULL. Then we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling reset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete the balance item in the root tree. However during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and unset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a reloc_root for that subvolume. Then we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of del_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside commit_fs_roots(). That function checks if fs_info->reloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree stage, but since fs_info->reloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Just add extra check on fs_info->reloc_ctl inside btrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking fs_info->reloc_ctl->merge_reloc_tree. That DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the reloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all, we do not need to bother that.(CVE-2024-49868)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 degamma hardware format translation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:338 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:339 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:340 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-49895)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uninit-value access of new_ea in ea_buffer syzbot reports that lzo1x_1_do_compress is using uninit-value: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in lzo1x_1_do_compress+0x19f9/0x2510 lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c:178 ... Uninit was stored to memory at: ea_put fs/jfs/xattr.c:639 [inline] ... Local variable ea_buf created at: __jfs_setxattr+0x5d/0x1ae0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:662 __jfs_xattr_set+0xe6/0x1f0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:934 ===================================================== The reason is ea_buf->new_ea is not initialized properly. Fix this by using memset to empty its content at the beginning in ea_get().(CVE-2024-49900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: check if leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree syzbot report a out of bounds in dbSplit, it because dmt_leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree, add a checking for dmt_leafidx in dbFindLeaf. Shaggy: Modified sanity check to apply to control pages as well as leaf pages.(CVE-2024-49902)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uaf in dbFreeBits [syzbot reported] ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880229254b0 by task syz-executor357/5216 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5216 Comm: syz-executor357 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00156-gd7a5aa4b3c00 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 dbFreeBits+0x7ea/0xd90 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2390 dbFreeDmap fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2089 [inline] dbFree+0x35b/0x680 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:409 dbDiscardAG+0x8a9/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1650 jfs_ioc_trim+0x433/0x670 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:100 jfs_ioctl+0x2d0/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Freed by task 5218: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object+0xe0/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:240 __kasan_slab_free+0x37/0x60 mm/kasan/common.c:256 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2252 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:4473 [inline] kfree+0x149/0x360 mm/slub.c:4594 dbUnmount+0x11d/0x190 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:278 jfs_mount_rw+0x4ac/0x6a0 fs/jfs/jfs_mount.c:247 jfs_remount+0x3d1/0x6b0 fs/jfs/super.c:454 reconfigure_super+0x445/0x880 fs/super.c:1083 vfs_cmd_reconfigure fs/fsopen.c:263 [inline] vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:292 [inline] __do_sys_fsconfig fs/fsopen.c:473 [inline] __se_sys_fsconfig+0xb6e/0xf80 fs/fsopen.c:345 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Analysis] There are two paths (dbUnmount and jfs_ioc_trim) that generate race condition when accessing bmap, which leads to the occurrence of uaf. Use the lock s_umount to synchronize them, in order to avoid uaf caused by race condition.(CVE-2024-49903)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add NULL check for function pointer in dcn20_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn20_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for null at line 1030, but then it was being dereferenced without any null check at line 1048. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a null check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 1048.(CVE-2024-49911)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for head_pipe in dcn32_acquire_idle_pipe_for_head_pipe_in_layer This commit addresses a potential null pointer dereference issue in the dcn32_acquire_idle_pipe_for_head_pipe_in_layer function. The issue could occur when head_pipe is null. The fix adds a check to ensure head_pipe is not null before asserting it. If head_pipe is null, the function returns NULL to prevent a potential null pointer dereference. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn32/dcn32_resource.c:2690 dcn32_acquire_idle_pipe_for_head_pipe_in_layer() error: we previously assumed 'head_pipe' could be null (see line 2681)(CVE-2024-49918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for head_pipe in dcn201_acquire_free_pipe_for_layer This commit addresses a potential null pointer dereference issue in the dcn201_acquire_free_pipe_for_layer function. The issue could occur when head_pipe is null. The fix adds a check to ensure head_pipe is not null before asserting it. If head_pipe is null, the function returns NULL to prevent a potential null pointer dereference. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn201/dcn201_resource.c:1016 dcn201_acquire_free_pipe_for_layer() error: we previously assumed 'head_pipe' could be null (see line 1010)(CVE-2024-49919)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ioapic: Handle allocation failures gracefully Breno observed panics when using failslab under certain conditions during runtime: can not alloc irq_pin_list (-1,0,20) Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC: failed to add irq-pin. Can not proceed panic+0x4e9/0x590 mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9ab/0xa80 irq_domain_alloc_irqs_locked+0x25d/0x8d0 __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x80/0x110 mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x645/0x890 acpi_register_gsi_ioapic+0xe6/0x150 hpet_open+0x313/0x480 That's a pointless panic which is a leftover of the historic IO/APIC code which panic'ed during early boot when the interrupt allocation failed. The only place which might justify panic is the PIT/HPET timer_check() code which tries to figure out whether the timer interrupt is delivered through the IO/APIC. But that code does not require to handle interrupt allocation failures. If the interrupt cannot be allocated then timer delivery fails and it either panics due to that or falls back to legacy mode. Cure this by removing the panic wrapper around __add_pin_to_irq_node() and making mp_irqdomain_alloc() aware of the failure condition and handle it as any other failure in this function gracefully.(CVE-2024-49927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove unreasonable unlock in ocfs2_read_blocks Patch series "Misc fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks", v5. This series contains 2 fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks(). The first patch fix the issue reported by syzbot, which detects bad unlock balance in ocfs2_read_blocks(). The second patch fixes an issue reported by Heming Zhao when reviewing above fix. This patch (of 2): There was a lock release before exiting, so remove the unreasonable unlock.(CVE-2024-49965)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 color transformation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:180 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:181 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:182 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-49969)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations Nothing appears to limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations that clients can start. In addition, AFAICT each async COPY can copy an unlimited number of 4MB chunks, so can run for a long time. Thus IMO async COPY can become a DoS vector. Add a restriction mechanism that bounds the number of concurrent background COPY operations. Start simple and try to be fair -- this patch implements a per-namespace limit. An async COPY request that occurs while this limit is exceeded gets NFS4ERR_DELAY. The requesting client can choose to send the request again after a delay or fall back to a traditional read/write style copy. If there is need to make the mechanism more sophisticated, we can visit that in future patches.(CVE-2024-49974)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/timerlat: Drop interface_lock in stop_kthread() stop_kthread() is the offline callback for "trace/osnoise:online", since commit 5bfbcd1ee57b ("tracing/timerlat: Add interface_lock around clearing of kthread in stop_kthread()"), the following ABBA deadlock scenario is introduced: T1 | T2 [BP] | T3 [AP] osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | work_for_cpu_fn() | cpuhp_thread_fun() | _cpu_down() | osnoise_cpu_die() mutex_lock(&interface_lock) | | stop_kthread() | cpus_write_lock() | mutex_lock(&interface_lock) cpus_read_lock() | cpuhp_kick_ap() | As the interface_lock here in just for protecting the "kthread" field of the osn_var, use xchg() instead to fix this issue. Also use for_each_online_cpu() back in stop_per_cpu_kthreads() as it can take cpu_read_lock() again.(CVE-2024-49976)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: stm32f7: Do not prepare/unprepare clock during runtime suspend/resume In case there is any sort of clock controller attached to this I2C bus controller, for example Versaclock or even an AIC32x4 I2C codec, then an I2C transfer triggered from the clock controller clk_ops .prepare callback may trigger a deadlock on drivers/clk/clk.c prepare_lock mutex. This is because the clock controller first grabs the prepare_lock mutex and then performs the prepare operation, including its I2C access. The I2C access resumes this I2C bus controller via .runtime_resume callback, which calls clk_prepare_enable(), which attempts to grab the prepare_lock mutex again and deadlocks. Since the clock are already prepared since probe() and unprepared in remove(), use simple clk_enable()/clk_disable() calls to enable and disable the clock on runtime suspend and resume, to avoid hitting the prepare_lock mutex.(CVE-2024-49985)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: asihpi: Fix potential OOB array access ASIHPI driver stores some values in the static array upon a response from the driver, and its index depends on the firmware. We shouldn't trust it blindly. This patch adds a sanity check of the array index to fit in the array size.(CVE-2024-50007)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpufreq: Avoid a bad reference count on CPU node In the parse_perf_domain function, if the call to of_parse_phandle_with_args returns an error, then the reference to the CPU device node that was acquired at the start of the function would not be properly decremented. Address this by declaring the variable with the __free(device_node) cleanup attribute.(CVE-2024-50012)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSv4: Prevent NULL-pointer dereference in nfs42_complete_copies() On the node of an NFS client, some files saved in the mountpoint of the NFS server were copied to another location of the same NFS server. Accidentally, the nfs42_complete_copies() got a NULL-pointer dereference crash with the following syslog: [232064.838881] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232064.839360] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232066.588183] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000058 [232066.588586] Mem abort info: [232066.588701] ESR = 0x0000000096000007 [232066.588862] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [232066.589084] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [232066.589216] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [232066.589340] FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault [232066.589559] Data abort info: [232066.589683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [232066.589842] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [232066.589967] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00002000956ff400 [232066.590231] [0000000000000058] pgd=08001100ae100003, p4d=08001100ae100003, pud=08001100ae100003, pmd=08001100b3c00003, pte=0000000000000000 [232066.590757] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [232066.590958] Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap tun ipt_rpfilter xt_multiport ip_set_hash_ip ip_set_hash_net xfrm_interface xfrm6_tunnel tunnel4 tunnel6 esp4 ah4 wireguard libcurve25519_generic veth xt_addrtype xt_set nf_conntrack_netlink ip_set_hash_ipportnet ip_set_hash_ipportip ip_set_bitmap_port ip_set_hash_ipport dummy ip_set ip_vs_sh ip_vs_wrr ip_vs_rr ip_vs iptable_filter sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout vport_gre ip_gre ip_tunnel gre vport_geneve geneve vport_vxlan vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel openvswitch nf_conncount dm_round_robin dm_service_time dm_multipath xt_nat xt_MASQUERADE nft_chain_nat nf_nat xt_mark xt_conntrack xt_comment nft_compat nft_counter nf_tables nfnetlink ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ipmi_ssif nbd overlay 8021q garp mrp bonding tls rfkill sunrpc ext4 mbcache jbd2 [232066.591052] vfat fat cas_cache cas_disk ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas sg acpi_ipmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ip_tables vfio_pci vfio_pci_core vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc fuse xfs libcrc32c ast drm_vram_helper qla2xxx drm_kms_helper syscopyarea crct10dif_ce sysfillrect ghash_ce sysimgblt sha2_ce fb_sys_fops cec sha256_arm64 sha1_ce drm_ttm_helper ttm nvme_fc igb sbsa_gwdt nvme_fabrics drm nvme_core i2c_algo_bit i40e scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas aes_neon_bs [232066.596953] CPU: 6 PID: 4124696 Comm: 10.253.166.125- Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.131-9.cl9_ocfs2.aarch64 #1 [232066.597356] Hardware name: Great Wall .\x93\x8e...RF6260 V5/GWMSSE2GL1T, BIOS T656FBE_V3.0.18 2024-01-06 [232066.597721] pstate: 20400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [232066.598034] pc : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x220/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598327] lr : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x12c/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598595] sp : ffff8000f568fc70 [232066.598731] x29: ffff8000f568fc70 x28: 0000000000001000 x27: ffff21003db33000 [232066.599030] x26: ffff800005521ae0 x25: ffff0100f98fa3f0 x24: 0000000000000001 [232066.599319] x23: ffff800009920008 x22: ffff21003db33040 x21: ffff21003db33050 [232066.599628] x20: ffff410172fe9e40 x19: ffff410172fe9e00 x18: 0000000000000000 [232066.599914] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000004 x15: 0000000000000000 [232066.600195] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800008e685a8 x12: 00000000eac0c6e6 [232066.600498] x11: 00000000000000 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50046)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check null pointer before dereferencing se [WHAT & HOW] se is null checked previously in the same function, indicating it might be null; therefore, it must be checked when used again. This fixes 1 FORWARD_NULL issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-50049)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: typec: tipd: Free IRQ only if it was requested before In polling mode, if no IRQ was requested there is no need to free it. Call devm_free_irq() only if client->irq is set. This fixes the warning caused by the tps6598x module removal: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 333 at kernel/irq/devres.c:144 devm_free_irq+0x80/0x8c ... ... Call trace: devm_free_irq+0x80/0x8c tps6598x_remove+0x28/0x88 [tps6598x] i2c_device_remove+0x2c/0x9c device_remove+0x4c/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x1cc/0x228 driver_detach+0x50/0x98 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 i2c_del_driver+0x54/0x64 tps6598x_i2c_driver_exit+0x18/0xc3c [tps6598x] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x184/0x264 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xe8 do_el0_svc+0x20/0x2c el0_svc+0x28/0x98 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194(CVE-2024-50057)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs3: Change to non-blocking allocation in ntfs_d_hash d_hash is done while under "rcu-walk" and should not sleep. __get_name() allocates using GFP_KERNEL, having the possibility to sleep when under memory pressure. Change the allocation to GFP_NOWAIT.(CVE-2024-50065)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-48.0.0.53.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntb: intel: Fix the NULL vs IS_ERR() bug for debugfs_create_dir() The debugfs_create_dir() function returns error pointers. It never returns NULL. So use IS_ERR() to check it.(CVE-2023-52917)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: pci: cx23885: check cx23885_vdev_init() return cx23885_vdev_init() can return a NULL pointer, but that pointer is used in the next line without a check. Add a NULL pointer check and go to the error unwind if it is NULL.(CVE-2023-52918)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: make sure that WRITTEN is set on all metadata blocks\r\n\r\nWe previously would call btrfs_check_leaf() if we had the check\nintegrity code enabled, which meant that we could only run the extended\nleaf checks if we had WRITTEN set on the header flags.\r\n\r\nThis leaves a gap in our checking, because we could end up with\ncorruption on disk where WRITTEN isn\u0026apos;t set on the leaf, and then the\nextended leaf checks don\u0026apos;t get run which we rely on to validate all of\nthe item pointers to make sure we don\u0026apos;t access memory outside of the\nextent buffer.\r\n\r\nHowever, since 732fab95abe2 (\u0026quot;btrfs: check-integrity: remove\nCONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY option\u0026quot;) we no longer call\nbtrfs_check_leaf() from btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), which means we only\never call it on blocks that are being written out, and thus have WRITTEN\nset, or that are being read in, which should have WRITTEN set.\r\n\r\nAdd checks to make sure we have WRITTEN set appropriately, and then make\nsure __btrfs_check_leaf() always does the item checking. This will\nprotect us from file systems that have been corrupted and no longer have\nWRITTEN set on some of the blocks.\r\n\r\nThis was hit on a crafted image tweaking the WRITTEN bit and reported by\nKASAN as out-of-bound access in the eb accessors. The example is a dir\nitem at the end of an eb.\r\n\r\n [2.042] BTRFS warning (device loop1): bad eb member start: ptr 0x3fff start 30572544 member offset 16410 size 2\n [2.040] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe0009d1000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\n [2.537] KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0005088000000018-0x000508800000001f]\n [2.729] CPU: 0 PID: 2587 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.8.2 #1\n [2.729] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n [2.621] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0\n [2.621] RSP: 0018:ffff88810871fab8 EFLAGS: 00000206\n [2.621] RAX: 0000a11000000003 RBX: ffff888104ff8720 RCX: ffff88811b2288c0\n [2.621] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff81dd8aca RDI: ffff88810871f748\n [2.621] RBP: 000000000000401a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10210e3ee9\n [2.621] R10: ffff88810871f74f R11: 205d323430333737 R12: 000000000000001a\n [2.621] R13: 000508800000001a R14: 1ffff110210e3f5d R15: ffffffff850011e8\n [2.621] FS: 00007f56ea275840(0000) GS:ffff88811b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [2.621] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [2.621] CR2: 00007febd13b75c0 CR3: 000000010bb50000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\n [2.621] Call Trace:\n [2.621] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [2.621] ? show_regs+0x74/0x80\n [2.621] ? die_addr+0x46/0xc0\n [2.621] ? exc_general_protection+0x161/0x2a0\n [2.621] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30\n [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0\n [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x34b/0x6d0\n [2.621] ? btrfs_get_16+0x33a/0x6d0\n [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_get_16+0x10/0x10\n [2.621] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10\n [2.621] btrfs_match_dir_item_name+0x101/0x1a0\n [2.621] btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x1f3/0x280\n [2.621] ? __pfx_btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x10/0x10\n [2.621] btrfs_get_tree+0xd25/0x1910\r\n\r\n[ copy more details from report ](CVE-2024-35949)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: ISO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input\r\n\r\nCheck user input length before copying data.(CVE-2024-35964)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niommu/arm-smmu: Use the correct type in nvidia_smmu_context_fault()\r\n\r\nThis was missed because of the function pointer indirection.\r\n\r\nnvidia_smmu_context_fault() is also installed as a irq function, and the\n\u0026apos;void *\u0026apos; was changed to a struct arm_smmu_domain. Since the iommu_domain\nis embedded at a non-zero offset this causes nvidia_smmu_context_fault()\nto miscompute the offset. Fixup the types.\r\n\r\n Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000120\n Mem abort info:\n ESR = 0x0000000096000004\n EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n SET = 0, FnV = 0\n EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault\n Data abort info:\n ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000\n CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0\n GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0\n user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000107c9f000\n [0000000000000120] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000\n Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 1 PID: 47 Comm: kworker/u25:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-0.rc7.58.eln136.aarch64 #1\n Hardware name: Unknown NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX/NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX, BIOS 3.1-32827747 03/19/2023\n Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func\n pstate: 604000c9 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : nvidia_smmu_context_fault+0x1c/0x158\n lr : __free_irq+0x1d4/0x2e8\n sp : ffff80008044b6f0\n x29: ffff80008044b6f0 x28: ffff000080a60b18 x27: ffffd32b5172e970\n x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000802f5aac x24: ffff0000802f5a30\n x23: ffff0000802f5b60 x22: 0000000000000057 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: ffff0000802f5a00 x19: ffff000087d4cd80 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: 6234362066666666 x16: 6630303078302d30 x15: ffff00008156d888\n x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff0000801db910 x12: ffff00008156d6d0\n x11: 0000000000000003 x10: ffff0000801db918 x9 : ffffd32b50f94d9c\n x8 : 1fffe0001032fda1 x7 : ffff00008197ed00 x6 : 000000000000000f\n x5 : 000000000000010e x4 : 000000000000010e x3 : 0000000000000000\n x2 : ffffd32b51720cd8 x1 : ffff000087e6f700 x0 : 0000000000000057\n Call trace:\n nvidia_smmu_context_fault+0x1c/0x158\n __free_irq+0x1d4/0x2e8\n free_irq+0x3c/0x80\n devm_free_irq+0x64/0xa8\n arm_smmu_domain_free+0xc4/0x158\n iommu_domain_free+0x44/0xa0\n iommu_deinit_device+0xd0/0xf8\n __iommu_group_remove_device+0xcc/0xe0\n iommu_bus_notifier+0x64/0xa8\n notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x148\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x90\n bus_notify+0x44/0x70\n device_del+0x264/0x3e8\n pci_remove_bus_device+0x84/0x120\n pci_remove_root_bus+0x5c/0xc0\n dw_pcie_host_deinit+0x38/0xe0\n tegra_pcie_config_rp+0xc0/0x1f0\n tegra_pcie_dw_probe+0x34c/0x700\n platform_probe+0x70/0xe8\n really_probe+0xc8/0x3a0\n __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130\n __device_attach_driver+0xc4/0x170\n bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0x100\n __device_attach+0xa8/0x1c8\n device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x30\n bus_probe_device+0xb0/0xc0\n deferred_probe_work_func+0xbc/0x120\n process_one_work+0x194/0x490\n worker_thread+0x284/0x3b0\n kthread+0xf4/0x108\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n Code: a9b97bfd 910003fd a9025bf5 f85a0035 (b94122a1)(CVE-2024-36884)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndev/parport: fix the array out-of-bounds risk\r\n\r\nFixed array out-of-bounds issues caused by sprintf\nby replacing it with snprintf for safer data copying,\nensuring the destination buffer is not overflowed.\r\n\r\nBelow is the stack trace I encountered during the actual issue:\r\n\r\n[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4]Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector:\nKernel stack is corrupted in: do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport]\n[ 66.575408s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,5]CPU: 4 PID: 5118 Comm:\nQThread Tainted: G S W O 5.10.97-arm64-desktop #7100.57021.2\n[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,6]TGID: 5087 Comm: EFileApp\n[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,7]Hardware name: HUAWEI HUAWEI QingYun\nPGUX-W515x-B081/SP1PANGUXM, BIOS 1.00.07 04/29/2024\n[ 66.575439s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,8]Call trace:\n[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,9] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0\n[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,0] show_stack+0x14/0x20\n[ 66.575469s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,1] dump_stack+0xd4/0x10c\n[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,2] panic+0x1d8/0x3bc\n[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,3] __stack_chk_fail+0x2c/0x38\n[ 66.575500s] [pid:5118,cpu4,QThread,4] do_hardware_base_addr+0xcc/0xd0 [parport](CVE-2024-42301)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diFree(CVE-2024-43858)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau: prime: fix refcount underflow\r\n\r\nCalling nouveau_bo_ref() on a nouveau_bo without initializing it (and\nhence the backing ttm_bo) leads to a refcount underflow.\r\n\r\nInstead of calling nouveau_bo_ref() in the unwind path of\ndrm_gem_object_init(), clean things up manually.\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 1b93f3e89d03cfc576636e195466a0d728ad8de5)(CVE-2024-43867)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndevres: Fix memory leakage caused by driver API devm_free_percpu()\r\n\r\nIt will cause memory leakage when use driver API devm_free_percpu()\nto free memory allocated by devm_alloc_percpu(), fixed by using\ndevres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within devm_free_percpu().(CVE-2024-43871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/msm/dpu: cleanup FB if dpu_format_populate_layout fails\r\n\r\nIf the dpu_format_populate_layout() fails, then FB is prepared, but not\ncleaned up. This ends up leaking the pin_count on the GEM object and\ncauses a splat during DRM file closure:\r\n\r\nmsm_obj-\u0026gt;pin_count\nWARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 569 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:121 update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc\n[...]\nCall trace:\n update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc\n put_pages+0xac/0x100\n msm_gem_free_object+0x138/0x180\n drm_gem_object_free+0x1c/0x30\n drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked+0x108/0x10c\n drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x58/0x70\n idr_for_each+0x68/0xec\n drm_gem_release+0x28/0x40\n drm_file_free+0x174/0x234\n drm_release+0xb0/0x160\n __fput+0xc0/0x2c8\n __fput_sync+0x50/0x5c\n __arm64_sys_close+0x38/0x7c\n invoke_syscall+0x48/0x118\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0\n do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28\n el0_svc+0x4c/0x120\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c\n el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\nirq event stamp: 129818\nhardirqs last enabled at (129817): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6d953fcc0\u0026gt;] console_unlock+0x118/0x124\nhardirqs last disabled at (129818): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6da7dcf04\u0026gt;] el1_dbg+0x24/0x8c\nsoftirqs last enabled at (129808): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6d94afc18\u0026gt;] handle_softirqs+0x4c8/0x4e8\nsoftirqs last disabled at (129785): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6d94105e4\u0026gt;] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20\r\n\r\nPatchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/600714/(CVE-2024-44982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ethernet: mtk_wed: fix use-after-free panic in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb()\r\n\r\nWhen there are multiple ap interfaces on one band and with WED on,\nturning the interface down will cause a kernel panic on MT798X.\r\n\r\nPreviously, cb_priv was freed in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block() without\nmarking NULL,and mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb() didn\u0026apos;t check the value, too.\r\n\r\nAssign NULL after free cb_priv in mtk_wed_setup_tc_block() and check NULL\nin mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb().\r\n\r\n----------\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0072460bca32b4f5\nCall trace:\n mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb+0x4/0x38\n 0xffffffc0794084bc\n tcf_block_playback_offloads+0x70/0x1e8\n tcf_block_unbind+0x6c/0xc8\n...\n---------(CVE-2024-44997)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: dwc3: core: Prevent USB core invalid event buffer address access\r\n\r\nThis commit addresses an issue where the USB core could access an\ninvalid event buffer address during runtime suspend, potentially causing\nSMMU faults and other memory issues in Exynos platforms. The problem\narises from the following sequence.\n 1. In dwc3_gadget_suspend, there is a chance of a timeout when\n moving the USB core to the halt state after clearing the\n run/stop bit by software.\n 2. In dwc3_core_exit, the event buffer is cleared regardless of\n the USB core\u0026apos;s status, which may lead to an SMMU faults and\n other memory issues. if the USB core tries to access the event\n buffer address.\r\n\r\nTo prevent this hardware quirk on Exynos platforms, this commit ensures\nthat the event buffer address is not cleared by software when the USB\ncore is active during runtime suspend by checking its status before\nclearing the buffer address.(CVE-2024-46675)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngtp: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference\r\n\r\nWhen sockfd_lookup() fails, gtp_encap_enable_socket() returns a\nNULL pointer, but its callers only check for error pointers thus miss\nthe NULL pointer case.\r\n\r\nFix it by returning an error pointer with the error code carried from\nsockfd_lookup().\r\n\r\n(I found this bug during code inspection.)(CVE-2024-46677)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix out-of-bounds read of df_v1_7_channel_number\r\n\r\nCheck the fb_channel_number range to avoid the array out-of-bounds\nread error(CVE-2024-46724)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix Null pointer dereference in btnxpuart_flush()\r\n\r\nThis adds a check before freeing the rx-\u0026gt;skb in flush and close\nfunctions to handle the kernel crash seen while removing driver after FW\ndownload fails or before FW download completes.\r\n\r\ndmesg log:\n[ 54.634586] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000080\n[ 54.643398] Mem abort info:\n[ 54.646204] ESR = 0x0000000096000004\n[ 54.649964] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n[ 54.655286] SET = 0, FnV = 0\n[ 54.658348] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n[ 54.661498] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault\n[ 54.666391] Data abort info:\n[ 54.669273] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000\n[ 54.674768] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0\n[ 54.674771] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0\n[ 54.674775] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000048860000\n[ 54.674780] [0000000000000080] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000\n[ 54.703880] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n[ 54.710152] Modules linked in: btnxpuart(-) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce polyval_generic snd_soc_imx_spdif snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_ak5558 snd_soc_ak4458 caam secvio error snd_soc_fsl_micfil snd_soc_fsl_spdif snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma gpio_ir_recv rc_core sch_fq_codel fuse\n[ 54.744357] CPU: 3 PID: 72 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 6.6.3-otbr-g128004619037 #2\n[ 54.744364] Hardware name: FSL i.MX8MM EVK board (DT)\n[ 54.744368] Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on\n[ 54.757244] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 54.757249] pc : kfree_skb_reason+0x18/0xb0\n[ 54.772299] lr : btnxpuart_flush+0x40/0x58 [btnxpuart]\n[ 54.782921] sp : ffff8000805ebca0\n[ 54.782923] x29: ffff8000805ebca0 x28: ffffa5c6cf1869c0 x27: ffffa5c6cf186000\n[ 54.782931] x26: ffff377b84852400 x25: ffff377b848523c0 x24: ffff377b845e7230\n[ 54.782938] x23: ffffa5c6ce8dbe08 x22: ffffa5c6ceb65410 x21: 00000000ffffff92\n[ 54.782945] x20: ffffa5c6ce8dbe98 x19: ffffffffffffffac x18: ffffffffffffffff\n[ 54.807651] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffa5c6ce2824ec x15: ffff8001005eb857\n[ 54.821917] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffffa5c6cf1a02e0 x12: 0000000000000642\n[ 54.821924] x11: 0000000000000040 x10: ffffa5c6cf19d690 x9 : ffffa5c6cf19d688\n[ 54.821931] x8 : ffff377b86000028 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000\n[ 54.821938] x5 : ffff377b86000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000\n[ 54.843331] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffffffffffffac\n[ 54.857599] Call trace:\n[ 54.857601] kfree_skb_reason+0x18/0xb0\n[ 54.863878] btnxpuart_flush+0x40/0x58 [btnxpuart]\n[ 54.863888] hci_dev_open_sync+0x3a8/0xa04\n[ 54.872773] hci_power_on+0x54/0x2e4\n[ 54.881832] process_one_work+0x138/0x260\n[ 54.881842] worker_thread+0x32c/0x438\n[ 54.881847] kthread+0x118/0x11c\n[ 54.881853] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n[ 54.896406] Code: a9be7bfd 910003fd f9000bf3 aa0003f3 (b940d400)\n[ 54.896410] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-46749)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhwmon: (nct6775-core) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes\r\n\r\nDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large\nnegative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user.\nFix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46757)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Validate function returns\r\n\r\n[WHAT \u0026amp; HOW]\nFunction return values must be checked before data can be used\nin subsequent functions.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 4 CHECKED_RETURN issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46775)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\r\n\r\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\r\n\r\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\r\n\r\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\r\n\r\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\r\n\r\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: added NULL check at start of dc_validate_stream\r\n\r\n[Why]\nprevent invalid memory access\r\n\r\n[How]\ncheck if dc and stream are NULL(CVE-2024-46802)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspi: nxp-fspi: fix the KASAN report out-of-bounds bug\r\n\r\nChange the memcpy length to fix the out-of-bounds issue when writing the\ndata that is not 4 byte aligned to TX FIFO.\r\n\r\nTo reproduce the issue, write 3 bytes data to NOR chip.\r\n\r\ndd if=3b of=/dev/mtd0\n[ 36.926103] ==================================================================\n[ 36.933409] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838\n[ 36.940514] Read of size 4 at addr ffff00081037c2a0 by task dd/455\n[ 36.946721]\n[ 36.948235] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 455 Comm: dd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-gc7b0e37c8434 #1070\n[ 36.956185] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QM MEK (DT)\n[ 36.961260] Call trace:\n[ 36.963723] dump_backtrace+0x90/0xe8\n[ 36.967414] show_stack+0x18/0x24\n[ 36.970749] dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90\n[ 36.974451] print_report+0x114/0x5cc\n[ 36.978151] kasan_report+0xa4/0xf0\n[ 36.981670] __asan_report_load_n_noabort+0x1c/0x28\n[ 36.986587] nxp_fspi_exec_op+0x26ec/0x2838\n[ 36.990800] spi_mem_exec_op+0x8ec/0xd30\n[ 36.994762] spi_mem_no_dirmap_read+0x190/0x1e0\n[ 36.999323] spi_mem_dirmap_write+0x238/0x32c\n[ 37.003710] spi_nor_write_data+0x220/0x374\n[ 37.007932] spi_nor_write+0x110/0x2e8\n[ 37.011711] mtd_write_oob_std+0x154/0x1f0\n[ 37.015838] mtd_write_oob+0x104/0x1d0\n[ 37.019617] mtd_write+0xb8/0x12c\n[ 37.022953] mtdchar_write+0x224/0x47c\n[ 37.026732] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8\n[ 37.030163] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0\n[ 37.033586] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c\n[ 37.037539] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258\n[ 37.041327] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c\n[ 37.046244] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c\n[ 37.049589] el0_svc+0x38/0x78\n[ 37.052681] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158\n[ 37.057077] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\n[ 37.060775]\n[ 37.062274] Allocated by task 455:\n[ 37.065701] kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54\n[ 37.069570] kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c\n[ 37.073438] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x40/0x54\n[ 37.077736] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb8\n[ 37.081515] __kmalloc_noprof+0x158/0x2f8\n[ 37.085563] mtd_kmalloc_up_to+0x120/0x154\n[ 37.089690] mtdchar_write+0x130/0x47c\n[ 37.093469] vfs_write+0x1e4/0x8c8\n[ 37.096901] ksys_write+0xec/0x1d0\n[ 37.100332] __arm64_sys_write+0x6c/0x9c\n[ 37.104287] invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258\n[ 37.108064] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c\n[ 37.112972] do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c\n[ 37.116319] el0_svc+0x38/0x78\n[ 37.119401] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158\n[ 37.123788] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\n[ 37.127474]\n[ 37.128977] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff00081037c2a0\n[ 37.128977] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\n[ 37.141177] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of\n[ 37.141177] allocated 3-byte region [ffff00081037c2a0, ffff00081037c2a3)\n[ 37.153465]\n[ 37.154971] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n[ 37.160559] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x89037c\n[ 37.168596] flags: 0xbfffe0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)\n[ 37.175149] page_type: 0xfdffffff(slab)\n[ 37.179021] raw: 0bfffe0000000000 ffff000800002500 dead000000000122 0000000000000000\n[ 37.186788] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080800080 00000001fdffffff 0000000000000000\n[ 37.194553] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\n[ 37.200144]\n[ 37.201647] Memory state around the buggy address:\n[ 37.206460] ffff00081037c180: fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc fa fc fc fc\n[ 37.213701] ffff00081037c200: fa fc fc fc 05 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc 02 fc fc fc\n[ 37.220946] \u0026gt;ffff00081037c280: 06 fc fc fc 03 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n[ 37.228186] ^\n[ 37.232473] ffff00081037c300: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n[ 37.239718] ffff00081037c380: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n[ 37.246962] ==============================================================\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Correct the defined value for AMDGPU_DMUB_NOTIFICATION_MAX\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nIt actually exposes \u0026apos;6\u0026apos; types in enum dmub_notification_type. Not 5. Using smaller\nnumber to create array dmub_callback \u0026amp; dmub_thread_offload has potential to access\nitem out of array bound. Fix it.(CVE-2024-46871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsmack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling\r\n\r\nCurrently, Smack mirrors the label of incoming tcp/ipv4 connections:\nwhen a label \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; connects to a label \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos; with tcp/ipv4,\n\u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; always gets \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; in returned ipv4 packets. So,\n1) returned packets are incorrectly labeled (\u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; instead of \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos;)\n2) \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos; can write to \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; without being authorized to write.\r\n\r\nHere is a scenario how to see this:\r\n\r\n* Take two machines, let\u0026apos;s call them C and S,\n with active Smack in the default state\n (no settings, no rules, no labeled hosts, only builtin labels)\r\n\r\n* At S, add Smack rule \u0026apos;foo bar w\u0026apos;\n (labels \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos; are instantiated at S at this moment)\r\n\r\n* At S, at label \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos;, launch a program\n that listens for incoming tcp/ipv4 connections\r\n\r\n* From C, at label \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos;, connect to the listener at S.\n (label \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; is instantiated at C at this moment)\n Connection succeedes and works.\r\n\r\n* Send some data in both directions.\n* Collect network traffic of this connection.\r\n\r\nAll packets in both directions are labeled with the CIPSO\nof the label \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos;. Hence, label \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos; writes to \u0026apos;foo\u0026apos; without\nbeing authorized, and even without ever being known at C.\r\n\r\nIf anybody cares: exactly the same happens with DCCP.\r\n\r\nThis behavior 1st manifested in release 2.6.29.4 (see Fixes below)\nand it looks unintentional. At least, no explanation was provided.\r\n\r\nI changed returned packes label into the \u0026apos;bar\u0026apos;,\nto bring it into line with the Smack documentation claims.(CVE-2024-47659)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfsnotify: clear PARENT_WATCHED flags lazily\r\n\r\nIn some setups directories can have many (usually negative) dentries.\nHence __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() function can take a\nsignificant amount of time. Since the bulk of this function happens\nunder inode-\u0026gt;i_lock this causes a significant contention on the lock\nwhen we remove the watch from the directory as the\n__fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() call from fsnotify_recalc_mask()\nraces with __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() calls from\n__fsnotify_parent() happening on children. This can lead upto softlockup\nreports reported by users.\r\n\r\nFix the problem by calling fsnotify_update_children_dentry_flags() to\nset PARENT_WATCHED flags only when parent starts watching children.\r\n\r\nWhen parent stops watching children, clear false positive PARENT_WATCHED\nflags lazily in __fsnotify_parent() for each accessed child.(CVE-2024-47660)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t\r\n\r\n[WHAT \u0026amp; HOW]\ndmub_rb_cmd\u0026apos;s ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned\n0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: keystone: Add workaround for Errata #i2037 (AM65x SR 1.0)\r\n\r\nErrata #i2037 in AM65x/DRA80xM Processors Silicon Revision 1.0\n(SPRZ452D_July 2018_Revised December 2019 [1]) mentions when an\ninbound PCIe TLP spans more than two internal AXI 128-byte bursts,\nthe bus may corrupt the packet payload and the corrupt data may\ncause associated applications or the processor to hang.\r\n\r\nThe workaround for Errata #i2037 is to limit the maximum read\nrequest size and maximum payload size to 128 bytes. Add workaround\nfor Errata #i2037 here.\r\n\r\nThe errata and workaround is applicable only to AM65x SR 1.0 and\nlater versions of the silicon will have this fixed.\r\n\r\n[1] -\u0026gt; https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz452i/sprz452i.pdf(CVE-2024-47667)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: mt7996: fix NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he Fix the NULL pointer dereference in mt7996_mcu_sta_bfer_he routine adding an sta interface to the mt7996 driver. Found by code review.(CVE-2024-47681)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Skip Recompute DSC Params if no Stream on Link [why] Encounter NULL pointer dereference uner mst + dsc setup. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 4 PID: 917 Comm: sway Not tainted 6.3.9-arch1-1 #1 124dc55df4f5272ccb409f39ef4872fc2b3376a2 Hardware name: LENOVO 20NKS01Y00/20NKS01Y00, BIOS R12ET61W(1.31 ) 07/28/2022 RIP: 0010:drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper] Code: 01 00 00 48 8b 85 60 05 00 00 48 63 80 88 00 00 00 3b 43 28 0f 8d 2e 01 00 00 48 8b 53 30 48 8d 04 80 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 40 18 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8\u0026gt; RSP: 0018:ffff960cc2df77d8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8afb87e81280 RCX: 0000000000000224 RDX: ffff8afb9ee37c00 RSI: ffff8afb8da1a578 RDI: ffff8afb87e81280 RBP: ffff8afb83d67000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8afb9652f850 R10: ffff960cc2df7908 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff8afb8d7688a0 R14: ffff8afb8da1a578 R15: 0000000000000224 FS: 00007f4dac35ce00(0000) GS:ffff8afe30b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000010ddc6000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0 ? plist_add+0xbe/0x100 ? exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026] ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x28/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026] compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_link+0x2ff/0xa40 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] ? fill_plane_buffer_attributes+0x419/0x510 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_state+0x1e1/0x250 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0xecd/0x1190 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] drm_atomic_check_only+0x5c5/0xa40 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x76e/0xbc0 [how] dsc recompute should be skipped if no mode change detected on the new request. If detected, keep checking whether the stream is already on current state or not.(CVE-2024-47683)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: check skb is non-NULL in tcp_rto_delta_us() We have some machines running stock Ubuntu 20.04.6 which is their 5.4.0-174-generic kernel that are running ceph and recently hit a null ptr dereference in tcp_rearm_rto(). Initially hitting it from the TLP path, but then later we also saw it getting hit from the RACK case as well. Here are examples of the oops messages we saw in each of those cases: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.780353] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.787572] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.792971] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.798362] PGD 0 P4D 0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.801164] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.805091] CPU: 0 PID: 9180 Comm: msgr-worker-1 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-174-generic #193-Ubuntu Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.814996] Hardware name: Supermicro SMC 2x26 os-gen8 64C NVME-Y 256G/H12SSW-NTR, BIOS 2.5.V1.2U.NVMe.UEFI 05/09/2023 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.825952] RIP: 0010:tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.830656] Code: 87 ca 04 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d c3 c3 49 8b bc 24 40 06 00 00 eb 8d 48 bb cf f7 53 e3 a5 9b c4 20 4c 89 ef e8 0c fe 0e 00 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8b 78 20 48 c1 ef 03 48 89 f8 41 8b bc 24 80 04 00 00 48 f7 e3 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.849665] RSP: 0018:ffffb75d40003e08 EFLAGS: 00010246 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.855149] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 20c49ba5e353f7cf RCX: 0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.862542] RDX: 0000000062177c30 RSI: 000000000000231c RDI: ffff9874ad283a60 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.869933] RBP: ffffb75d40003e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff987605e20aa8 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.877318] R10: ffffb75d40003f00 R11: ffffb75d4460f740 R12: ffff9874ad283900 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.884710] R13: ffff9874ad283a60 R14: ffff9874ad283980 R15: ffff9874ad283d30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.892095] FS: 00007f1ef4a2e700(0000) GS:ffff987605e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.900438] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.906435] CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000003e450ba003 CR4: 0000000000760ef0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.913822] PKRU: 55555554 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.916786] Call Trace: Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.919488] Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.921765] ? show_regs.cold+0x1a/0x1f Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.925859] ? __die+0x90/0xd9 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.929169] ? no_context+0x196/0x380 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.933088] ? ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4e0/0x4e0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.938216] ? ip6_sublist_rcv_finish+0x3d/0x50 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.943000] ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x50/0x1a0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.947873] ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x20 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.952486] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x267/0x450 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.957104] ? ipv6_list_rcv+0x112/0x140 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.961279] ? __do_page_fault+0x58/0x90 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.965458] ? do_page_fault+0x2c/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.969465] ? page_fault+0x34/0x40 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.973217] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.977313] ? tcp_rearm_rto+0xe4/0x160 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.981408] tcp_send_loss_probe+0x10b/0x220 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.985937] tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1b4/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.990809] tcp_write_timer+0x9e/0xe0 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.994814] ? tcp_write_timer_handler+0x240/0x240 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061395.999866] call_timer_fn+0x32/0x130 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.003782] __run_timers.part.0+0x180/0x280 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.008309] ? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.012841] ? native_x2apic_icr_write+0x30/0x30 Jul 26 15:05:02 rx [11061396.017718] ? lapic_next_even ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47684)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject_ipv6: fix nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() syzbot reported that nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() was possibly sending garbage on the four reserved tcp bits (th-\u0026gt;res1) Use skb_put_zero() to clear the whole TCP header, as done in nf_reject_ip_tcphdr_put() BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x688/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:255 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1da/0xa00 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x4ad/0xa50 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xe7/0x980 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa5a/0x19b0 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x1ce/0x800 kernel/softirq.c:554 __do_softirq+0x14/0x1a kernel/softirq.c:588 do_softirq+0x9a/0x100 kernel/softirq.c:455 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9f/0xb0 kernel/softirq.c:382 local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline] rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2692/0x5610 net/core/dev.c:4450 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline] neigh_resolve_output+0x9ca/0xae0 net/core/neighbour.c:1565 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:542 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x2347/0x2ba0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:141 __ip6_finish_output net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:215 [inline] ip6_finish_output+0xbb8/0x14b0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:226 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip6_output+0x356/0x620 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:247 dst_output include/net/dst.h:450 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0x1ba6/0x25d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:366 inet6_csk_xmit+0x442/0x530 net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c:135 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x3b07/0x4880 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1484 [inline] tcp_connect+0x35b6/0x7130 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4143 tcp_v6_connect+0x1bcc/0x1e40 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:333 __inet_stream_connect+0x2ef/0x1730 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:679 inet_stream_connect+0x6a/0xd0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:750 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2061 [inline] __sys_connect+0x606/0x690 net/socket.c:2078 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2088 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2085 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x91/0xe0 net/socket.c:2085 x64_sys_call+0x27a5/0x3ba0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:43 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was stored to memory at: nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put+0x60c/0x6c0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:249 nf_send_reset6+0xd84/0x15b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c:344 nft_reject_inet_eval+0x3c1/0x880 net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.c:48 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x438/0x22a0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_inet+0x41a/0x4f0 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:161 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0x29b/0x390 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:310 __netif_receive_skb_one_core ---truncated---(CVE-2024-47685)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to don\u0026apos;t set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error() syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Workqueue: events destroy_super_work RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 Call Trace: percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42 destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag covered w/ sb-\u0026gt;s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below race condition causes this bug: - freeze_super() - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb-\u0026gt;s_flags |= SB_RDONLY - thaw_super - thaw_super_locked - sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - deactivate_locked_super Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option: - set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped - record errors to superblock - set SB_RDONLY falg Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not set SB_RDONLY flag, let\u0026apos;s remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz(CVE-2024-47689)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: return -EINVAL when namelen is 0 When we have a corrupted main.sqlite in /var/lib/nfs/nfsdcld/, it may result in namelen being 0, which will cause memdup_user() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR. When we access the name.data that has been assigned the value of ZERO_SIZE_PTR in nfs4_client_to_reclaim(), null pointer dereference is triggered. [ T1205] ================================================================== [ T1205] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] Read of size 1 at addr 0000000000000010 by task nfsdcld/1205 [ T1205] [ T1205] CPU: 11 PID: 1205 Comm: nfsdcld Not tainted 5.10.0-00003-g2c1423731b8d #406 [ T1205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ T1205] Call Trace: [ T1205] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] __kasan_report.cold+0x34/0x84 [ T1205] ? nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 [ T1205] nfs4_client_to_reclaim+0xe9/0x260 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_release_lockowner+0x410/0x410 [ T1205] cld_pipe_downcall+0x5ca/0x760 [ T1205] ? nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ T1205] ? down_write_killable_nested+0x170/0x170 [ T1205] ? avc_policy_seqno+0x28/0x40 [ T1205] ? selinux_file_permission+0x1b4/0x1e0 [ T1205] rpc_pipe_write+0x84/0xb0 [ T1205] vfs_write+0x143/0x520 [ T1205] ksys_write+0xc9/0x170 [ T1205] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xfe/0x110 [ T1205] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa2/0x110 [ T1205] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [ T1205] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 [ T1205] RIP: 0033:0x7fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 514 [ T1205] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c4b7248 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000042b RCX: 00007fdbdb761bc7 [ T1205] RDX: 000000000000042b RSI: 00007fff8c4b75f0 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ T1205] RBP: 00007fdbdb761bb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ T1205] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000042b [ T1205] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 00007fff8c4b75f0 R15: 0000000000000000 [ T1205] ================================================================== Fix it by checking namelen.(CVE-2024-47692)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rtrs-clt: Reset cid to con_num - 1 to stay in bounds In the function init_conns(), after the create_con() and create_cm() for loop if something fails. In the cleanup for loop after the destroy tag, we access out of bound memory because cid is set to clt_path-\u0026gt;s.con_num. This commits resets the cid to clt_path-\u0026gt;s.con_num - 1, to stay in bounds in the cleanup loop later.(CVE-2024-47695)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2832: fix an out-of-bounds write error Ensure index in rtl2832_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access. dev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this issue. [hverkuil: added fixes tag, rtl2830_pid_filter -\u0026gt; rtl2832_pid_filter in logmsg](CVE-2024-47698)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: bcm: Clear bo-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry(). syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has been unregistered. However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the remaining bo-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() in bcm_release(). Let\u0026apos;s clear bo-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). [0] name \u0026apos;4986\u0026apos; WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-47709)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sock_map: Add a cond_resched() in sock_hash_free() Several syzbot soft lockup reports all have in common sock_hash_free() If a map with a large number of buckets is destroyed, we need to yield the cpu when needed.(CVE-2024-47710)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for set_output_gamma in dcn30_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn30_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for nullity at line 386, but then it was being dereferenced without any nullity check at line 401. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is indeed null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a nullity check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 401. If set_output_gamma is null, we log an error message and do not call the function. This fix prevents a potential null pointer dereference error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c:401 dcn30_set_output_transfer_func() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;mpc-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;set_output_gamma\u0026apos; could be null (see line 386) drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn30/dcn30_hwseq.c 373 bool dcn30_set_output_transfer_func(struct dc *dc, 374 struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx, 375 const struct dc_stream_state *stream) 376 { 377 int mpcc_id = pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_res.hubp-\u0026gt;inst; 378 struct mpc *mpc = pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;stream_res.opp-\u0026gt;ctx-\u0026gt;dc-\u0026gt;res_pool-\u0026gt;mpc; 379 const struct pwl_params *params = NULL; 380 bool ret = false; 381 382 /* program OGAM or 3DLUT only for the top pipe*/ 383 if (pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;top_pipe == NULL) { 384 /*program rmu shaper and 3dlut in MPC*/ 385 ret = dcn30_set_mpc_shaper_3dlut(pipe_ctx, stream); 386 if (ret == false \u0026amp;\u0026amp; mpc-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;set_output_gamma) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If this is NULL 387 if (stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_HWPWL) 388 params = \u0026amp;stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.pwl; 389 else if (pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.type == 390 TF_TYPE_DISTRIBUTED_POINTS \u0026amp;\u0026amp; 391 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format( 392 \u0026amp;stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func, 393 \u0026amp;mpc-\u0026gt;blender_params, false)) 394 params = \u0026amp;mpc-\u0026gt;blender_params; 395 /* there are no ROM LUTs in OUTGAM */ 396 if (stream-\u0026gt;out_transfer_func.type == TF_TYPE_PREDEFINED) 397 BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER(); 398 } 399 } 400 --\u0026gt; 401 mpc-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;set_output_gamma(mpc, mpcc_id, params); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Then it will crash 402 return ret; 403 }(CVE-2024-47720)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: call cache_put if xdr_reserve_space returns NULL If not enough buffer space available, but idmap_lookup has triggered lookup_fn which calls cache_get and returns successfully. Then we missed to call cache_put here which pairs with cache_get. Reviwed-by: Jeff Layton \u0026lt;jlayton@kernel.org\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-47737)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KEYS: prevent NULL pointer dereference in find_asymmetric_key() In find_asymmetric_key(), if all NULLs are passed in the id_{0,1,2} arguments, the kernel will first emit WARN but then have an oops because id_2 gets dereferenced anyway. Add the missing id_2 check and move WARN_ON() to the final else branch to avoid duplicate NULL checks. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static analysis tool.(CVE-2024-47743)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix potential oob read in nilfs_btree_check_delete() The function nilfs_btree_check_delete(), which checks whether degeneration to direct mapping occurs before deleting a b-tree entry, causes memory access outside the block buffer when retrieving the maximum key if the root node has no entries. This does not usually happen because b-tree mappings with 0 child nodes are never created by mkfs.nilfs2 or nilfs2 itself. However, it can happen if the b-tree root node read from a device is configured that way, so fix this potential issue by adding a check for that case.(CVE-2024-47757)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nbd: fix race between timeout and normal completion If request timetout is handled by nbd_requeue_cmd(), normal completion has to be stopped for avoiding to complete this requeued request, other use-after-free can be triggered. Fix the race by clearing NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT in nbd_requeue_cmd(), meantime make sure that cmd-\u0026gt;lock is grabbed for clearing the flag and the requeue.(CVE-2024-49855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing There is another found exception that the \u0026quot;timerlat/1\u0026quot; thread was scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally: ``` ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ... Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? __warn+0x7c/0x110 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0 ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20 ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0 ? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10 __debug_object_init+0x110/0x150 hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60 timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0 ? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt; ``` After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration of the \u0026quot;timerlat/1\u0026quot; thread was performed during thread creation. Further analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU: T1 | T2 [CPUHP_ONLINE] | cpu_device_down() osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | | cpus_write_lock() | takedown_cpu(1) | cpus_write_unlock() [CPUHP_OFFLINE] | cpus_read_lock() | start_kthread(1) | cpus_read_unlock() | To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.(CVE-2024-49866)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: wait for fixup workers before stopping cleaner kthread during umount During unmount, at close_ctree(), we have the following steps in this order: 1) Park the cleaner kthread - this doesn\u0026apos;t destroy the kthread, it basically halts its execution (wake ups against it work but do nothing); 2) We stop the cleaner kthread - this results in freeing the respective struct task_struct; 3) We call btrfs_stop_all_workers() which waits for any jobs running in all the work queues and then free the work queues. Syzbot reported a case where a fixup worker resulted in a crash when doing a delayed iput on its inode while attempting to wake up the cleaner at btrfs_add_delayed_iput(), because the task_struct of the cleaner kthread was already freed. This can happen during unmount because we don\u0026apos;t wait for any fixup workers still running before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner kthread, which stops and free all its resources. Fix this by waiting for any fixup workers at close_ctree() before we call kthread_stop() against the cleaner and run pending delayed iputs. The stack traces reported by syzbot were the following: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880272a8a18 by task kworker/u8:3/52 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Workqueue: btrfs-fixup btrfs_work_helper Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __lock_acquire+0x77/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5065 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 class_raw_spinlock_irqsave_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:551 [inline] try_to_wake_up+0xb0/0x1480 kernel/sched/core.c:4154 btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker+0xc16/0xdf0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:2842 btrfs_work_helper+0x390/0xc50 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:314 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa63/0x1850 kernel/workqueue.c:3310 worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3391 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt; Allocated by task 2: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:319 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x66/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:345 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:247 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4086 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4135 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x16b/0x320 mm/slub.c:4187 alloc_task_struct_node kernel/fork.c:180 [inline] dup_task_struct+0x57/0x8c0 kernel/fork.c:1107 copy_process+0x5d1/0x3d50 kernel/fork.c:2206 kernel_clone+0x223/0x880 kernel/fork.c:2787 kernel_thread+0x1bc/0x240 kernel/fork.c:2849 create_kthread kernel/kthread.c:412 [inline] kthreadd+0x60d/0x810 kernel/kthread.c:765 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 Freed by task 61: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:247 [inline] __kasan_slab_free+0x59/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:264 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:230 [inline] slab_free_h ---truncated---(CVE-2024-49867)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion [BUG] Syzbot reported a NULL pointer dereference with the following crash: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. start_transaction+0x830/0x1670 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:676 prepare_to_relocate+0x31f/0x4c0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3642 relocate_block_group+0x169/0xd20 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3678 ... BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -12 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000660-0x0000000000000667] RIP: 0010:btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x362/0xa80 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:926 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; commit_fs_roots+0x2ee/0x720 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1496 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xfaf/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2430 del_balance_item fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3678 [inline] reset_balance_state+0x25e/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3742 btrfs_balance+0xead/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4574 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3673 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf9/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [CAUSE] The allocation failure happens at the start_transaction() inside prepare_to_relocate(), and during the error handling we call unset_reloc_control(), which makes fs_info-\u0026gt;balance_ctl to be NULL. Then we continue the error path cleanup in btrfs_balance() by calling reset_balance_state() which will call del_balance_item() to fully delete the balance item in the root tree. However during the small window between set_reloc_contrl() and unset_reloc_control(), we can have a subvolume tree update and created a reloc_root for that subvolume. Then we go into the final btrfs_commit_transaction() of del_balance_item(), and into btrfs_update_reloc_root() inside commit_fs_roots(). That function checks if fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl is in the merge_reloc_tree stage, but since fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl is NULL, it results a NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Just add extra check on fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl inside btrfs_update_reloc_root(), before checking fs_info-\u0026gt;reloc_ctl-\u0026gt;merge_reloc_tree. That DEAD_RELOC_TREE handling is to prevent further modification to the reloc tree during merge stage, but since there is no reloc_ctl at all, we do not need to bother that.(CVE-2024-49868)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 degamma hardware format translation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the `cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format` function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:338 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:339 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:340 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-49895)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uninit-value access of new_ea in ea_buffer syzbot reports that lzo1x_1_do_compress is using uninit-value: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in lzo1x_1_do_compress+0x19f9/0x2510 lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c:178 ... Uninit was stored to memory at: ea_put fs/jfs/xattr.c:639 [inline] ... Local variable ea_buf created at: __jfs_setxattr+0x5d/0x1ae0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:662 __jfs_xattr_set+0xe6/0x1f0 fs/jfs/xattr.c:934 ===================================================== The reason is ea_buf-\u0026gt;new_ea is not initialized properly. Fix this by using memset to empty its content at the beginning in ea_get().(CVE-2024-49900)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: check if leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree syzbot report a out of bounds in dbSplit, it because dmt_leafidx greater than num leaves per dmap tree, add a checking for dmt_leafidx in dbFindLeaf. Shaggy: Modified sanity check to apply to control pages as well as leaf pages.(CVE-2024-49902)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Fix uaf in dbFreeBits [syzbot reported] ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880229254b0 by task syz-executor357/5216 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5216 Comm: syz-executor357 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00156-gd7a5aa4b3c00 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xfe/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 dbFreeBits+0x7ea/0xd90 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2390 dbFreeDmap fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:2089 [inline] dbFree+0x35b/0x680 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:409 dbDiscardAG+0x8a9/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1650 jfs_ioc_trim+0x433/0x670 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:100 jfs_ioctl+0x2d0/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Freed by task 5218: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_free_info+0x40/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:579 poison_slab_object+0xe0/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:240 __kasan_slab_free+0x37/0x60 mm/kasan/common.c:256 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:184 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:2252 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:4473 [inline] kfree+0x149/0x360 mm/slub.c:4594 dbUnmount+0x11d/0x190 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:278 jfs_mount_rw+0x4ac/0x6a0 fs/jfs/jfs_mount.c:247 jfs_remount+0x3d1/0x6b0 fs/jfs/super.c:454 reconfigure_super+0x445/0x880 fs/super.c:1083 vfs_cmd_reconfigure fs/fsopen.c:263 [inline] vfs_fsconfig_locked fs/fsopen.c:292 [inline] __do_sys_fsconfig fs/fsopen.c:473 [inline] __se_sys_fsconfig+0xb6e/0xf80 fs/fsopen.c:345 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Analysis] There are two paths (dbUnmount and jfs_ioc_trim) that generate race condition when accessing bmap, which leads to the occurrence of uaf. Use the lock s_umount to synchronize them, in order to avoid uaf caused by race condition.(CVE-2024-49903)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add NULL check for function pointer in dcn20_set_output_transfer_func This commit adds a null check for the set_output_gamma function pointer in the dcn20_set_output_transfer_func function. Previously, set_output_gamma was being checked for null at line 1030, but then it was being dereferenced without any null check at line 1048. This could potentially lead to a null pointer dereference error if set_output_gamma is null. To fix this, we now ensure that set_output_gamma is not null before dereferencing it. We do this by adding a null check for set_output_gamma before the call to set_output_gamma at line 1048.(CVE-2024-49911)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for head_pipe in dcn32_acquire_idle_pipe_for_head_pipe_in_layer This commit addresses a potential null pointer dereference issue in the `dcn32_acquire_idle_pipe_for_head_pipe_in_layer` function. The issue could occur when `head_pipe` is null. The fix adds a check to ensure `head_pipe` is not null before asserting it. If `head_pipe` is null, the function returns NULL to prevent a potential null pointer dereference. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn32/dcn32_resource.c:2690 dcn32_acquire_idle_pipe_for_head_pipe_in_layer() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;head_pipe\u0026apos; could be null (see line 2681)(CVE-2024-49918)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add null check for head_pipe in dcn201_acquire_free_pipe_for_layer This commit addresses a potential null pointer dereference issue in the `dcn201_acquire_free_pipe_for_layer` function. The issue could occur when `head_pipe` is null. The fix adds a check to ensure `head_pipe` is not null before asserting it. If `head_pipe` is null, the function returns NULL to prevent a potential null pointer dereference. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn201/dcn201_resource.c:1016 dcn201_acquire_free_pipe_for_layer() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;head_pipe\u0026apos; could be null (see line 1010)(CVE-2024-49919)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/ioapic: Handle allocation failures gracefully Breno observed panics when using failslab under certain conditions during runtime: can not alloc irq_pin_list (-1,0,20) Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC: failed to add irq-pin. Can not proceed panic+0x4e9/0x590 mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9ab/0xa80 irq_domain_alloc_irqs_locked+0x25d/0x8d0 __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x80/0x110 mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x645/0x890 acpi_register_gsi_ioapic+0xe6/0x150 hpet_open+0x313/0x480 That\u0026apos;s a pointless panic which is a leftover of the historic IO/APIC code which panic\u0026apos;ed during early boot when the interrupt allocation failed. The only place which might justify panic is the PIT/HPET timer_check() code which tries to figure out whether the timer interrupt is delivered through the IO/APIC. But that code does not require to handle interrupt allocation failures. If the interrupt cannot be allocated then timer delivery fails and it either panics due to that or falls back to legacy mode. Cure this by removing the panic wrapper around __add_pin_to_irq_node() and making mp_irqdomain_alloc() aware of the failure condition and handle it as any other failure in this function gracefully.(CVE-2024-49927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: remove unreasonable unlock in ocfs2_read_blocks Patch series \u0026quot;Misc fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks\u0026quot;, v5. This series contains 2 fixes for ocfs2_read_blocks(). The first patch fix the issue reported by syzbot, which detects bad unlock balance in ocfs2_read_blocks(). The second patch fixes an issue reported by Heming Zhao when reviewing above fix. This patch (of 2): There was a lock release before exiting, so remove the unreasonable unlock.(CVE-2024-49965)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in DCN30 color transformation This commit addresses a potential index out of bounds issue in the `cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format` function in the DCN30 color management module. The issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, the function returns false to indicate an error. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:180 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:181 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn30/dcn30_cm_common.c:182 cm3_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-49969)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations Nothing appears to limit the number of concurrent async COPY operations that clients can start. In addition, AFAICT each async COPY can copy an unlimited number of 4MB chunks, so can run for a long time. Thus IMO async COPY can become a DoS vector. Add a restriction mechanism that bounds the number of concurrent background COPY operations. Start simple and try to be fair -- this patch implements a per-namespace limit. An async COPY request that occurs while this limit is exceeded gets NFS4ERR_DELAY. The requesting client can choose to send the request again after a delay or fall back to a traditional read/write style copy. If there is need to make the mechanism more sophisticated, we can visit that in future patches.(CVE-2024-49974)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/timerlat: Drop interface_lock in stop_kthread() stop_kthread() is the offline callback for \u0026quot;trace/osnoise:online\u0026quot;, since commit 5bfbcd1ee57b (\u0026quot;tracing/timerlat: Add interface_lock around clearing of kthread in stop_kthread()\u0026quot;), the following ABBA deadlock scenario is introduced: T1 | T2 [BP] | T3 [AP] osnoise_hotplug_workfn() | work_for_cpu_fn() | cpuhp_thread_fun() | _cpu_down() | osnoise_cpu_die() mutex_lock(\u0026amp;interface_lock) | | stop_kthread() | cpus_write_lock() | mutex_lock(\u0026amp;interface_lock) cpus_read_lock() | cpuhp_kick_ap() | As the interface_lock here in just for protecting the \u0026quot;kthread\u0026quot; field of the osn_var, use xchg() instead to fix this issue. Also use for_each_online_cpu() back in stop_per_cpu_kthreads() as it can take cpu_read_lock() again.(CVE-2024-49976)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: stm32f7: Do not prepare/unprepare clock during runtime suspend/resume In case there is any sort of clock controller attached to this I2C bus controller, for example Versaclock or even an AIC32x4 I2C codec, then an I2C transfer triggered from the clock controller clk_ops .prepare callback may trigger a deadlock on drivers/clk/clk.c prepare_lock mutex. This is because the clock controller first grabs the prepare_lock mutex and then performs the prepare operation, including its I2C access. The I2C access resumes this I2C bus controller via .runtime_resume callback, which calls clk_prepare_enable(), which attempts to grab the prepare_lock mutex again and deadlocks. Since the clock are already prepared since probe() and unprepared in remove(), use simple clk_enable()/clk_disable() calls to enable and disable the clock on runtime suspend and resume, to avoid hitting the prepare_lock mutex.(CVE-2024-49985)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: asihpi: Fix potential OOB array access ASIHPI driver stores some values in the static array upon a response from the driver, and its index depends on the firmware. We shouldn\u0026apos;t trust it blindly. This patch adds a sanity check of the array index to fit in the array size.(CVE-2024-50007)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpufreq: Avoid a bad reference count on CPU node In the parse_perf_domain function, if the call to of_parse_phandle_with_args returns an error, then the reference to the CPU device node that was acquired at the start of the function would not be properly decremented. Address this by declaring the variable with the __free(device_node) cleanup attribute.(CVE-2024-50012)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSv4: Prevent NULL-pointer dereference in nfs42_complete_copies() On the node of an NFS client, some files saved in the mountpoint of the NFS server were copied to another location of the same NFS server. Accidentally, the nfs42_complete_copies() got a NULL-pointer dereference crash with the following syslog: [232064.838881] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232064.839360] NFSv4: state recovery failed for open file nfs/pvc-12b5200d-cd0f-46a3-b9f0-af8f4fe0ef64.qcow2, error = -116 [232066.588183] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000058 [232066.588586] Mem abort info: [232066.588701] ESR = 0x0000000096000007 [232066.588862] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [232066.589084] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [232066.589216] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [232066.589340] FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault [232066.589559] Data abort info: [232066.589683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [232066.589842] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [232066.589967] user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00002000956ff400 [232066.590231] [0000000000000058] pgd=08001100ae100003, p4d=08001100ae100003, pud=08001100ae100003, pmd=08001100b3c00003, pte=0000000000000000 [232066.590757] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [232066.590958] Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap tun ipt_rpfilter xt_multiport ip_set_hash_ip ip_set_hash_net xfrm_interface xfrm6_tunnel tunnel4 tunnel6 esp4 ah4 wireguard libcurve25519_generic veth xt_addrtype xt_set nf_conntrack_netlink ip_set_hash_ipportnet ip_set_hash_ipportip ip_set_bitmap_port ip_set_hash_ipport dummy ip_set ip_vs_sh ip_vs_wrr ip_vs_rr ip_vs iptable_filter sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout vport_gre ip_gre ip_tunnel gre vport_geneve geneve vport_vxlan vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel openvswitch nf_conncount dm_round_robin dm_service_time dm_multipath xt_nat xt_MASQUERADE nft_chain_nat nf_nat xt_mark xt_conntrack xt_comment nft_compat nft_counter nf_tables nfnetlink ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ipmi_ssif nbd overlay 8021q garp mrp bonding tls rfkill sunrpc ext4 mbcache jbd2 [232066.591052] vfat fat cas_cache cas_disk ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas sg acpi_ipmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ip_tables vfio_pci vfio_pci_core vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc fuse xfs libcrc32c ast drm_vram_helper qla2xxx drm_kms_helper syscopyarea crct10dif_ce sysfillrect ghash_ce sysimgblt sha2_ce fb_sys_fops cec sha256_arm64 sha1_ce drm_ttm_helper ttm nvme_fc igb sbsa_gwdt nvme_fabrics drm nvme_core i2c_algo_bit i40e scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas aes_neon_bs [232066.596953] CPU: 6 PID: 4124696 Comm: 10.253.166.125- Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.131-9.cl9_ocfs2.aarch64 #1 [232066.597356] Hardware name: Great Wall .\\x93\\x8e...RF6260 V5/GWMSSE2GL1T, BIOS T656FBE_V3.0.18 2024-01-06 [232066.597721] pstate: 20400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [232066.598034] pc : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x220/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598327] lr : nfs4_reclaim_open_state+0x12c/0x800 [nfsv4] [232066.598595] sp : ffff8000f568fc70 [232066.598731] x29: ffff8000f568fc70 x28: 0000000000001000 x27: ffff21003db33000 [232066.599030] x26: ffff800005521ae0 x25: ffff0100f98fa3f0 x24: 0000000000000001 [232066.599319] x23: ffff800009920008 x22: ffff21003db33040 x21: ffff21003db33050 [232066.599628] x20: ffff410172fe9e40 x19: ffff410172fe9e00 x18: 0000000000000000 [232066.599914] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000004 x15: 0000000000000000 [232066.600195] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800008e685a8 x12: 00000000eac0c6e6 [232066.600498] x11: 00000000000000 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50046)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check null pointer before dereferencing se [WHAT \u0026amp; HOW] se is null checked previously in the same function, indicating it might be null; therefore, it must be checked when used again. This fixes 1 FORWARD_NULL issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-50049)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: typec: tipd: Free IRQ only if it was requested before In polling mode, if no IRQ was requested there is no need to free it. Call devm_free_irq() only if client-\u0026gt;irq is set. This fixes the warning caused by the tps6598x module removal: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 333 at kernel/irq/devres.c:144 devm_free_irq+0x80/0x8c ... ... Call trace: devm_free_irq+0x80/0x8c tps6598x_remove+0x28/0x88 [tps6598x] i2c_device_remove+0x2c/0x9c device_remove+0x4c/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x1cc/0x228 driver_detach+0x50/0x98 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 i2c_del_driver+0x54/0x64 tps6598x_i2c_driver_exit+0x18/0xc3c [tps6598x] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x184/0x264 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xe8 do_el0_svc+0x20/0x2c el0_svc+0x28/0x98 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194(CVE-2024-50057)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs3: Change to non-blocking allocation in ntfs_d_hash d_hash is done while under \u0026quot;rcu-walk\u0026quot; and should not sleep. __get_name() allocates using GFP_KERNEL, having the possibility to sleep when under memory pressure. Change the allocation to GFP_NOWAIT.(CVE-2024-50065)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2325",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:48Z",
"published": "2024-11-01T11:07:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2325"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36884"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43858"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44997"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47681"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47695"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47720"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47743"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49974"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49976"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50065"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2023-52917",
"CVE-2023-52918",
"CVE-2024-35949",
"CVE-2024-35964",
"CVE-2024-36884",
"CVE-2024-42301",
"CVE-2024-43858",
"CVE-2024-43867",
"CVE-2024-43871",
"CVE-2024-44982",
"CVE-2024-44997",
"CVE-2024-46675",
"CVE-2024-46677",
"CVE-2024-46724",
"CVE-2024-46749",
"CVE-2024-46757",
"CVE-2024-46775",
"CVE-2024-46782",
"CVE-2024-46802",
"CVE-2024-46853",
"CVE-2024-46871",
"CVE-2024-47659",
"CVE-2024-47660",
"CVE-2024-47661",
"CVE-2024-47667",
"CVE-2024-47681",
"CVE-2024-47683",
"CVE-2024-47684",
"CVE-2024-47685",
"CVE-2024-47689",
"CVE-2024-47692",
"CVE-2024-47695",
"CVE-2024-47698",
"CVE-2024-47709",
"CVE-2024-47710",
"CVE-2024-47720",
"CVE-2024-47737",
"CVE-2024-47743",
"CVE-2024-47757",
"CVE-2024-49855",
"CVE-2024-49866",
"CVE-2024-49867",
"CVE-2024-49868",
"CVE-2024-49895",
"CVE-2024-49900",
"CVE-2024-49902",
"CVE-2024-49903",
"CVE-2024-49911",
"CVE-2024-49918",
"CVE-2024-49919",
"CVE-2024-49927",
"CVE-2024-49965",
"CVE-2024-49969",
"CVE-2024-49974",
"CVE-2024-49976",
"CVE-2024-49985",
"CVE-2024-50007",
"CVE-2024-50012",
"CVE-2024-50046",
"CVE-2024-50049",
"CVE-2024-50057",
"CVE-2024-50065"
]
}
OESA-2025-1158 (CVE-2024-46782)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-02-21 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner
syzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]
Issue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable, then call nf_unregister_net_hooks().
It should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().
This is a good match for a pre_exit() method.
[1] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620 flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy) raw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as freed page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline] kmalloclarge_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline] rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071 ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613 ops_ini ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error
Ensure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access.
dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue.(CVE-2024-47697)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it
Kernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such as following calltrace:
PID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "nvme" #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15 #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014 #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1 #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006 #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362 #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25 RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574 RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
This due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot to unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the pending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here try to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and simplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout
conn->sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock so this checks if the conn->sk is still valid by checking if it part of sco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()
The "*cmd" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means "new_cam" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc->updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).
The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -> ucsi_send_command() -> ucsi_send_command_common() -> ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi->ops->sync_control() -> ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT
In qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed to be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it's valid to create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff: Budimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active class list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.
In 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress qdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent TC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a hierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into qdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).
In the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree levels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the iteration must stop.
net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour
The mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like control flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete state, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.
A large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late in the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently observed issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.
Taking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of checks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the logic into a static internal function __mmap_region().
Doing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do any real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check unconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE validation unconditionally also.
We move a number of things here:
-
We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free iterator state on both success and error paths.
-
The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable() logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.
We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.
We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the opposite.
- We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region() function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.
With all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close the VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a call to any driver mmap hook.
This eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason about and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt
When tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists, the values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check for ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the vulnerability occurs.
So we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: Flush partial mappings in error case
If some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have buffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer reference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only cleaned up later in the mmap error path.
Fix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.
See commit 79a61cc3fc04 ("mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case").(CVE-2024-53148)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()
I found the following bug in my fuzzer:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51 index 255 is out of range for type 'htc_endpoint [22]' CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130 htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70 ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610 ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0 ...
Since this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification of conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for conn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock object. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the sock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free later.
Clear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock object. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the sock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free later.
Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe
devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this returned value in grgpio_probe is not checked. Add NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling
CPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function call sequence:
CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --> s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() ... CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --> perf_event_exit_cpu()
The s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:
s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() +--> cpusf_pmu_setup() +--> setup_pmc_cpu() +--> deallocate_buffers()
This function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated for that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the PMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.
With the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event hotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the following function calls on the removed CPU:
perf_event_exit_cpu() +--> perf_event_exit_cpu_context() +--> __perf_event_exit_context() +--> __perf_remove_from_context() +--> event_sched_out() +--> cpumsf_pmu_del() +--> cpumsf_pmu_stop() +--> hw_perf_event_update()
to stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the sampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from the sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed (and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free situation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the best case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains valid data.
Remedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved state (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been released an contain valid data. This is always the case when the event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured). If the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()
syzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]
commit 031ae72825ce ("ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner") attempted to fix a similar issue.
Looking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.
Add a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline] ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672 __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785 process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074 handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.
To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error).
As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX
Use INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it is possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when resizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:
0708a0afe291 ("mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls")
Note: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits
on 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a 32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long. This could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error\n\nEnsure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent\nout-of-bounds access.\n\ndev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should\nonly operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to\naccess a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access.\nChange the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this\nissue.(CVE-2024-47697)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it\n\nKernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such\nas following calltrace:\n\nPID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: \u0026quot;nvme\u0026quot;\n #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15\n #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014\n #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1\n #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a\n #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006\n #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce\n #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced\n #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b\n #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362\n #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25\n RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574\n RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004\n RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004\n R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500\n ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b\n\nThis due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot\nto unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the\npending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here\ntry to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and\nsimplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout\n\nconn-\u0026gt;sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock\nso this checks if the conn-\u0026gt;sk is still valid by checking if it part of\nsco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \u0026quot;*cmd\u0026quot; variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\u0026quot;new_cam\u0026quot; can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u0026gt;updated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT\n\nIn qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed\nto be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it\u0026apos;s valid\nto create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff:\nBudimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active\nclass list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.\n\nIn 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress\nqdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent\nTC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a\nhierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into\nqdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).\n\nIn the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree\nlevels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the\niteration must stop.\n\n\n net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +-\n 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour\n\nThe mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like\ncontrol flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete\nstate, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.\n\nA large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late\nin the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently\nobserved issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.\n\nTaking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of\nchecks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the\nlogic into a static internal function __mmap_region().\n\nDoing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do\nany real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check\nunconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE\nvalidation unconditionally also.\n\nWe move a number of things here:\n\n1. We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed\n memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform\n complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free\n iterator state on both success and error paths.\n\n2. The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable()\n logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the\n point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching\n mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.\n\n We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable\n mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however\n doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in\n any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.\n\n We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the\n opposite.\n\n3. We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region()\n function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is\n only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning\n for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought\n eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.\n\nWith all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close\nthe VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a\ncall to any driver mmap hook.\n\nThis eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason\nabout and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt\n\nWhen tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists,\nthe values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check\nfor ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the\nvulnerability occurs.\n\nSo we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncomedi: Flush partial mappings in error case\n\nIf some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have\nbuffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer\nreference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only\ncleaned up later in the mmap error path.\n\nFix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.\n\nSee commit 79a61cc3fc04 (\u0026quot;mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in\nerror case\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-53148)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()\n\nI found the following bug in my fuzzer:\n\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51\n index 255 is out of range for type \u0026apos;htc_endpoint [22]\u0026apos;\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130\n htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70\n ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610\n ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0\n ...\n\nSince this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification\nof conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for\nconn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock\nobject. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the\nsock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock\nobject. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the\nsock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe\n\ndevm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this\nreturned value in grgpio_probe is not checked.\nAdd NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL\npointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling\n\nCPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function\ncall sequence:\n\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n ...\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu()\n\nThe s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:\n\n s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; cpusf_pmu_setup()\n +--\u0026gt; setup_pmc_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; deallocate_buffers()\n\nThis function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated\nfor that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the\nPMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.\n\nWith the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event\nhotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the\nfollowing function calls on the removed CPU:\n\n perf_event_exit_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu_context()\n +--\u0026gt; __perf_event_exit_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; __perf_remove_from_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; event_sched_out()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_del()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_stop()\n +--\u0026gt; hw_perf_event_update()\n\nto stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the\nsampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from\nthe sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed\n(and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free\nsituation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the\nbest case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains\nvalid data.\n\nRemedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved\nstate (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been\nreleased an contain valid data. This is always the case when\nthe event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured).\nIf the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()\n\nsyzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]\n\ncommit 031ae72825ce (\u0026quot;ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\u0026quot;)\nattempted to fix a similar issue.\n\nLooking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.\n\nAdd a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline]\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785\n process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074\n handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts\n\nEven though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot\nstill managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow\ncounters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.\n\nTo avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses,\nthis commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters\nto a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any\nincrements and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving\nreadability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into\nthese helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the\ncode (which was the cause of the original logic error).\n\nAs part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated\ninto a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the\nost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a\nsparse flow\u0026apos;s quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect\nof this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow\nstays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should\nnot make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it\u0026apos;s not worth\ncomplicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX\n\nUse INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it\nis possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when\nresizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:\n\n 0708a0afe291 (\u0026quot;mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls\u0026quot;)\n\nNote: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits\n\non 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a\n32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long.\nThis could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1158",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:15Z",
"published": "2025-02-21T11:08:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1158"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21647"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21667"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-46782",
"CVE-2024-47697",
"CVE-2024-49569",
"CVE-2024-50125",
"CVE-2024-50268",
"CVE-2024-53057",
"CVE-2024-53096",
"CVE-2024-53141",
"CVE-2024-53148",
"CVE-2024-53156",
"CVE-2024-56600",
"CVE-2024-56601",
"CVE-2024-56634",
"CVE-2024-57849",
"CVE-2024-57900",
"CVE-2025-21647",
"CVE-2025-21648",
"CVE-2025-21667"
]
}
OESA-2025-1162 (CVE-2024-46782)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-02-21 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner
syzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]
Issue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable, then call nf_unregister_net_hooks().
It should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().
This is a good match for a pre_exit() method.
[1] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620 flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy) raw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as freed page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline] kmalloclarge_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline] rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071 ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613 ops_ini ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error
Ensure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access.
dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue.(CVE-2024-47697)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it
Kernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such as following calltrace:
PID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "nvme" #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15 #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014 #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1 #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006 #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362 #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25 RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574 RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
This due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot to unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the pending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here try to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and simplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout
conn->sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock so this checks if the conn->sk is still valid by checking if it part of sco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()
The "*cmd" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means "new_cam" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc->updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).
The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -> ucsi_send_command() -> ucsi_send_command_common() -> ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi->ops->sync_control() -> ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT
In qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed to be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it's valid to create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff: Budimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active class list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.
In 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress qdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent TC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a hierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into qdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).
In the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree levels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the iteration must stop.
net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour
The mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like control flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete state, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.
A large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late in the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently observed issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.
Taking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of checks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the logic into a static internal function __mmap_region().
Doing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do any real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check unconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE validation unconditionally also.
We move a number of things here:
-
We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free iterator state on both success and error paths.
-
The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable() logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.
We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.
We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the opposite.
- We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region() function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.
With all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close the VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a call to any driver mmap hook.
This eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason about and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt
When tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists, the values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check for ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the vulnerability occurs.
So we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: Flush partial mappings in error case
If some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have buffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer reference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only cleaned up later in the mmap error path.
Fix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.
See commit 79a61cc3fc04 ("mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case").(CVE-2024-53148)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()
I found the following bug in my fuzzer:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51 index 255 is out of range for type 'htc_endpoint [22]' CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130 htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70 ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610 ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0 ...
Since this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification of conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for conn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock object. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the sock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free later.
Clear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock object. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the sock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free later.
Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe
devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this returned value in grgpio_probe is not checked. Add NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling
CPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function call sequence:
CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --> s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() ... CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --> perf_event_exit_cpu()
The s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:
s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() +--> cpusf_pmu_setup() +--> setup_pmc_cpu() +--> deallocate_buffers()
This function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated for that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the PMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.
With the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event hotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the following function calls on the removed CPU:
perf_event_exit_cpu() +--> perf_event_exit_cpu_context() +--> __perf_event_exit_context() +--> __perf_remove_from_context() +--> event_sched_out() +--> cpumsf_pmu_del() +--> cpumsf_pmu_stop() +--> hw_perf_event_update()
to stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the sampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from the sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed (and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free situation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the best case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains valid data.
Remedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved state (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been released an contain valid data. This is always the case when the event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured). If the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()
syzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]
commit 031ae72825ce ("ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner") attempted to fix a similar issue.
Looking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.
Add a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline] ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672 __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785 process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074 handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.
To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error).
As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX
Use INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it is possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when resizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:
0708a0afe291 ("mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls")
Note: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits
on 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a 32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long. This could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error\n\nEnsure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent\nout-of-bounds access.\n\ndev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should\nonly operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to\naccess a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access.\nChange the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this\nissue.(CVE-2024-47697)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it\n\nKernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such\nas following calltrace:\n\nPID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: \u0026quot;nvme\u0026quot;\n #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15\n #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014\n #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1\n #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a\n #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006\n #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce\n #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced\n #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b\n #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362\n #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25\n RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574\n RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004\n RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004\n R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500\n ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b\n\nThis due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot\nto unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the\npending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here\ntry to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and\nsimplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout\n\nconn-\u0026gt;sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock\nso this checks if the conn-\u0026gt;sk is still valid by checking if it part of\nsco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \u0026quot;*cmd\u0026quot; variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\u0026quot;new_cam\u0026quot; can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u0026gt;updated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT\n\nIn qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed\nto be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it\u0026apos;s valid\nto create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff:\nBudimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active\nclass list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.\n\nIn 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress\nqdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent\nTC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a\nhierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into\nqdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).\n\nIn the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree\nlevels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the\niteration must stop.\n\n\n net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +-\n 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour\n\nThe mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like\ncontrol flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete\nstate, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.\n\nA large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late\nin the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently\nobserved issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.\n\nTaking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of\nchecks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the\nlogic into a static internal function __mmap_region().\n\nDoing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do\nany real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check\nunconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE\nvalidation unconditionally also.\n\nWe move a number of things here:\n\n1. We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed\n memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform\n complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free\n iterator state on both success and error paths.\n\n2. The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable()\n logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the\n point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching\n mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.\n\n We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable\n mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however\n doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in\n any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.\n\n We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the\n opposite.\n\n3. We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region()\n function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is\n only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning\n for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought\n eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.\n\nWith all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close\nthe VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a\ncall to any driver mmap hook.\n\nThis eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason\nabout and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt\n\nWhen tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists,\nthe values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check\nfor ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the\nvulnerability occurs.\n\nSo we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncomedi: Flush partial mappings in error case\n\nIf some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have\nbuffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer\nreference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only\ncleaned up later in the mmap error path.\n\nFix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.\n\nSee commit 79a61cc3fc04 (\u0026quot;mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in\nerror case\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-53148)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()\n\nI found the following bug in my fuzzer:\n\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51\n index 255 is out of range for type \u0026apos;htc_endpoint [22]\u0026apos;\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130\n htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70\n ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610\n ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0\n ...\n\nSince this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification\nof conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for\nconn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock\nobject. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the\nsock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock\nobject. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the\nsock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe\n\ndevm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this\nreturned value in grgpio_probe is not checked.\nAdd NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL\npointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling\n\nCPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function\ncall sequence:\n\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n ...\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu()\n\nThe s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:\n\n s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; cpusf_pmu_setup()\n +--\u0026gt; setup_pmc_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; deallocate_buffers()\n\nThis function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated\nfor that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the\nPMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.\n\nWith the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event\nhotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the\nfollowing function calls on the removed CPU:\n\n perf_event_exit_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu_context()\n +--\u0026gt; __perf_event_exit_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; __perf_remove_from_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; event_sched_out()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_del()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_stop()\n +--\u0026gt; hw_perf_event_update()\n\nto stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the\nsampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from\nthe sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed\n(and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free\nsituation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the\nbest case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains\nvalid data.\n\nRemedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved\nstate (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been\nreleased an contain valid data. This is always the case when\nthe event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured).\nIf the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()\n\nsyzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]\n\ncommit 031ae72825ce (\u0026quot;ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\u0026quot;)\nattempted to fix a similar issue.\n\nLooking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.\n\nAdd a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline]\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785\n process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074\n handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts\n\nEven though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot\nstill managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow\ncounters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.\n\nTo avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses,\nthis commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters\nto a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any\nincrements and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving\nreadability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into\nthese helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the\ncode (which was the cause of the original logic error).\n\nAs part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated\ninto a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the\nost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a\nsparse flow\u0026apos;s quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect\nof this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow\nstays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should\nnot make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it\u0026apos;s not worth\ncomplicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX\n\nUse INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it\nis possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when\nresizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:\n\n 0708a0afe291 (\u0026quot;mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls\u0026quot;)\n\nNote: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits\n\non 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a\n32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long.\nThis could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1162",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:15Z",
"published": "2025-02-21T11:08:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1162"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21647"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21667"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-46782",
"CVE-2024-47697",
"CVE-2024-49569",
"CVE-2024-50125",
"CVE-2024-50268",
"CVE-2024-53057",
"CVE-2024-53096",
"CVE-2024-53141",
"CVE-2024-53148",
"CVE-2024-53156",
"CVE-2024-56600",
"CVE-2024-56601",
"CVE-2024-56634",
"CVE-2024-57849",
"CVE-2024-57900",
"CVE-2025-21647",
"CVE-2025-21648",
"CVE-2025-21667"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.