Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-43831 (GCVE-0-2024-43831)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-08-17 09:21 – Updated: 2026-05-11 20:30| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc , < dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c
(git)
Affected: 590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc , < 1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db (git) Affected: 590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc , < cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280 (git) Affected: 590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc , < 59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
4.10
Unaffected: 0 , < 4.10 (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.131 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.44 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10.3 , ≤ 6.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.11 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-43831",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:08:27.988158Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T17:33:23.652Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:30:43.133Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.10"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.10",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.44",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.44",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.10",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\n\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:30:39.430Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f"
}
],
"title": "media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-43831",
"datePublished": "2024-08-17T09:21:49.593Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-08-17T09:11:59.273Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:30:39.430Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-43831",
"date": "2026-09-17",
"epss": "0.00225",
"percentile": "0.13351"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-10-12T01:01:21.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-43831",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2024-43831",
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2024/msrc_cve-2024-43831.json",
"version": "1"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-43831\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2024-08-17T10:15:08.917\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T07:51:47.867\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\\n\\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\\nis valid for future use.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: media: mediatek: vcodec: Manejar un decodificador vsi no v\u00e1lido Maneje un decodificador vsi no v\u00e1lido en vpu_dec_init para garantizar que el decodificador vsi sea v\u00e1lido para uso futuro.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Linux\",\"product\":\"Linux\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"programFiles\":[\"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c\"],\"repo\":\"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\",\"lessThan\":\"dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\",\"lessThan\":\"1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\",\"lessThan\":\"cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\",\"lessThan\":\"59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"Linux\",\"product\":\"Linux\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"programFiles\":[\"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c\"],\"repo\":\"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"4.10\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"4.10\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.1.131\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.1.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.6.44\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.6.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.10.3\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.10.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.11\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"original_commit_for_fix\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2024-09-10T16:08:27.988158Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2024-43831\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.10\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.1.131\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2D369DE3-7BE3-49D2-B196-31625CA9BC55\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.2\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.6.44\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CC912330-6B41-4C6B-99AF-F3857FBACB6A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.7\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.10.3\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"92D388F2-1EAF-4CFA-AC06-5B26D762EA7D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2025-11-21T10:40:31+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-43831",
"id": "CVE-2024-43831",
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-17T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "198",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-43831.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-03T19:30:43.133Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-43831\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-09-10T16:08:27.988158Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-09-11T12:42:23.143Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\", \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\", \"vendor\": \"Linux\", \"product\": \"Linux\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\", \"lessThan\": \"dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\", \"lessThan\": \"1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\", \"lessThan\": \"cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc\", \"lessThan\": \"59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}], \"programFiles\": [\"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"repo\": \"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\", \"vendor\": \"Linux\", \"product\": \"Linux\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.10\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"4.10\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.1.131\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.1.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.6.44\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.6.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.10.3\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.10.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.11\", \"versionType\": \"original_commit_for_fix\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"*\"}], \"programFiles\": [\"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"bippy-1.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\\n\\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\\nis valid for future use.\"}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.1.131\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"4.10\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.6.44\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"4.10\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.10.3\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"4.10\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.11\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"4.10\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\", \"shortName\": \"Linux\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-11T20:30:39.430Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-43831\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-11T20:30:39.430Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-08-17T09:11:59.273Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-08-17T09:21:49.593Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Linux\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-03-20 - Updated: 2026-03-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.26+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.6.9 | ||
| VMware | N/A | Python Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.83 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.1.9 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu RabbitMQ sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.4 | ||
| VMware | N/A | PHP Buildpack versions antérieures à 4.6.69 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.2.5 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.9+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.5.17 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu RabbitMQ pour Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.1.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 1.16.18 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu for Valkey sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.26+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.9+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.6 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.26+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.6.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Python Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.83",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu RabbitMQ sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.4",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "PHP Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.6.69",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.5",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.9+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.5.17",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu RabbitMQ pour Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.2",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.16.18",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu for Valkey sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.2",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.26+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.9+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-8660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-65637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-7445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-7445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-17977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1010204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-34034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-34034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-67735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-10782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-0256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-0537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-6952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-4542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-4542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37233",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37233"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37237",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37237"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37236",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37236"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37246",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37246"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37235",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37235"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37229",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37229"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37226",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37226"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37230",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37230"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37242",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37242"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37228",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37228"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37240",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37240"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37243",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37243"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37234",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37234"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37231",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37231"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37239",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37239"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37227",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37227"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37232",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37232"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37247",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37247"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37241",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37241"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37238",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37238"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37244",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37244"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37245",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37245"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-43831
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-08-17 10:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:51| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "590577a4e5257ac3ed72999a94666ad6ba8f24bc",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec_vpu_if.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.10"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.10",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.44",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2D369DE3-7BE3-49D2-B196-31625CA9BC55",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CC912330-6B41-4C6B-99AF-F3857FBACB6A",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.44",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "92D388F2-1EAF-4CFA-AC06-5B26D762EA7D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\n\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: media: mediatek: vcodec: Manejar un decodificador vsi no v\u00e1lido Maneje un decodificador vsi no v\u00e1lido en vpu_dec_init para garantizar que el decodificador vsi sea v\u00e1lido para uso futuro."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-43831",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:51:47.867",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-43831",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:08:27.988158Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-08-17T10:15:08.917",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-MF66-HM23-7R53
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-17 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi
Handle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi is valid for future use.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-43831"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-17T10:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\n\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use.",
"id": "GHSA-mf66-hm23-7r53",
"modified": "2025-11-03T21:31:11Z",
"published": "2024-08-17T12:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c109f23b271a02b9bb195c173fab41e3285a8db"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59d438f8e02ca641c58d77e1feffa000ff809e9f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf05ae76198c513836bde4eb55f099c44773280"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbd3e4adb98e50ede74f00b3fa956fa29ef95e6c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2024-43831
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2024-08-02 00:00 - Updated: 2025-10-12 01:01oesa-2024-2077
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():
$ cat fs/fs-writeback.c: (...) static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ... { (...) WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)); (...) } (...)
The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:
[947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186 [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...) [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50 [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000 [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488 [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460 [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0 [947.571072] Call Trace: [947.572354] <TASK> [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998 [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156 [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407 [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139 [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32 [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [947.597561] </TASK> [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---
This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made by commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning, and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.
We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem() is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.
To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it. This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered elsewhere.
An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number of delalloc bytes we currently have, in ---truncated---(CVE-2022-48920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core
The seg6_input() function is responsible for adding the SRH into a packet, delegating the operation to the seg6_input_core(). This function uses the skb_cow_head() to ensure that there is sufficient headroom in the sk_buff for accommodating the link-layer header. In the event that the skb_cow_header() function fails, the seg6_input_core() catches the error but it does not release the sk_buff, which will result in a memory leak.
This issue was introduced in commit af3b5158b89d ("ipv6: sr: fix BUG due to headroom too small after SRH push") and persists even after commit 7a3f5b0de364 ("netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane"), where the entire seg6_input() code was refactored to deal with netfilter hooks.
The proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by requiring the seg6_input_core() function to release the sk_buff in the event that skb_cow_head() fails.(CVE-2024-39490)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: add bounds checking to ocfs2_check_dir_entry()
This adds sanity checks for ocfs2_dir_entry to make sure all members of ocfs2_dir_entry don't stray beyond valid memory region.(CVE-2024-41015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hfsplus: fix uninit-value in copy_name
[syzbot reported] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160 sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160 copy_name+0x2af/0x320 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:411 hfsplus_listxattr+0x11e9/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:750 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline] listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline] __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline] __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline] __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873 x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3877 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3918 [inline] kmalloc_trace+0x57b/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:4065 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:628 [inline] hfsplus_listxattr+0x4cc/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:699 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline] listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline] __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline] __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline] __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873 x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Fix] When allocating memory to strbuf, initialize memory to 0.(CVE-2024-41059)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/sclp: Fix sclp_init() cleanup on failure
If sclp_init() fails it only partially cleans up: if there are multiple failing calls to sclp_init() sclp_state_change_event will be added several times to sclp_reg_list, which results in the following warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------ list_add double add: new=000003ffe1598c10, prev=000003ffe1598bf0, next=000003ffe1598c10. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3 Krnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 000003ffe0d6076a (__list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8) R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 ... Call Trace: [<000003ffe0d6076a>] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8 ([<000003ffe0d60766>] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8) [<000003ffe0a8d37e>] sclp_init+0x40e/0x450 [<000003ffe00009f2>] do_one_initcall+0x42/0x1e0 [<000003ffe15b77a6>] do_initcalls+0x126/0x150 [<000003ffe15b7a0a>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ba/0x1f8 [<000003ffe0d6650e>] kernel_init+0x2e/0x180 [<000003ffe000301c>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [<000003ffe0d759ca>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
Fix this by removing sclp_state_change_event from sclp_reg_list when sclp_init() fails.(CVE-2024-41068)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check pipe offset before setting vblank
pipe_ctx has a size of MAX_PIPES so checking its index before accessing the array.
This fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-42120)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer check for kzalloc
[Why & How] Check return pointer of kzalloc before using it.(CVE-2024-42122)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
protect the fetch of ->fd[fd] in do_dup2() from mispredictions
both callers have verified that fd is not greater than ->max_fds; however, misprediction might end up with tofree = fdt->fd[fd]; being speculatively executed. That's wrong for the same reasons why it's wrong in close_fd()/file_close_fd_locked(); the same solution applies - array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds) could differ from fd only in case of speculative execution on mispredicted path.(CVE-2024-42265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()
iucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context. iucv->path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of severing the path (or it is already removed / never existed). This needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a small window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has already been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by iucv_tasklet_fn().
Example: [452744.123844] Call Trace: [452744.123845] ([<0000001e87f03880>] 0x1e87f03880) [452744.123966] [<00000000d593001e>] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138 [452744.124330] [<000003ff801ddbca>] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124336] [<000003ff801e01b6>] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv] [452744.124341] [<000003ff801e08cc>] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124345] [<00000000d574794e>] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8 [452744.124815] [<00000000d5747a0c>] sock_close+0x34/0x48 [452744.124820] [<00000000d5421642>] __fput+0xba/0x268 [452744.124826] [<00000000d51b382c>] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0 [452744.124832] [<00000000d5145710>] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90 [452744.124841] [<00000000d5978096>] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8 [452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [452744.125321] [<00000000d5930018>] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138 [452744.125324] [452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Note that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against process context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and corresponding handling is missing.
Ideas for a future clean-up patch: A) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in Re-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the tasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.
B) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()
Don't dereference sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(sp).(CVE-2024-42280)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix a segment issue when downgrading gso_size
Linearize the skb when downgrading gso_size because it may trigger a BUG_ON() later when the skb is segmented as described in [1,2].(CVE-2024-42281)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str() on error
tipc_udp_addr2str() should return non-zero value if the UDP media address is invalid. Otherwise, a buffer overflow access can occur in tipc_media_addr_printf(). Fix this by returning 1 on an invalid UDP media address.(CVE-2024-42284)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/iwcm: Fix a use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs
iw_conn_req_handler() associates a new struct rdma_id_private (conn_id) with an existing struct iw_cm_id (cm_id) as follows:
conn_id->cm_id.iw = cm_id;
cm_id->context = conn_id;
cm_id->cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;
rdma_destroy_id() frees both the cm_id and the struct rdma_id_private. Make sure that cm_work_handler() does not trigger a use-after-free by only freeing of the struct rdma_id_private after all pending work has finished.(CVE-2024-42285)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Fix for possible memory corruption
Init Control Block is dereferenced incorrectly. Correctly dereference ICB(CVE-2024-42288)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to don't dirty inode for readonly filesystem
syzbot reports f2fs bug as below:
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:933! RIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x1576/0x1590 fs/f2fs/inode.c:933 Call Trace: evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664 dispose_list fs/inode.c:697 [inline] evict_inodes+0x5f8/0x690 fs/inode.c:747 generic_shutdown_super+0x9d/0x2c0 fs/super.c:675 kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1667 kill_f2fs_super+0x303/0x3b0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4894 deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x130 fs/super.c:484 cleanup_mnt+0x426/0x4c0 fs/namespace.c:1256 task_work_run+0x24a/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 ptrace_notify+0x2cd/0x380 kernel/signal.c:2399 ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline] ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline] syscall_exit_work kernel/entry/common.c:251 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare kernel/entry/common.c:278 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x15c/0x280 kernel/entry/common.c:296 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:88 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
The root cause is: - do_sys_open - f2fs_lookup - __f2fs_find_entry - f2fs_i_depth_write - f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync - f2fs_dirty_inode - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)
- umount
- kill_f2fs_super
- kill_block_super
- generic_shutdown_super
- sync_filesystem : sb is readonly, skip sync_filesystem()
- evict_inodes
- iput
- f2fs_evict_inode
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)) : trigger kernel panic
When we try to repair i_current_depth in readonly filesystem, let's skip dirty inode to avoid panic in later f2fs_evict_inode().(CVE-2024-42297)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/DPC: Fix use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal
Keith reports a use-after-free when a DPC event occurs concurrently to hot-removal of the same portion of the hierarchy:
The dpc_handler() awaits readiness of the secondary bus below the Downstream Port where the DPC event occurred. To do so, it polls the config space of the first child device on the secondary bus. If that child device is concurrently removed, accesses to its struct pci_dev cause the kernel to oops.
That's because pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() neglects to hold a reference on the child device. Before v6.3, the function was only called on resume from system sleep or on runtime resume. Holding a reference wasn't necessary back then because the pciehp IRQ thread could never run concurrently. (On resume from system sleep, IRQs are not enabled until after the resume_noirq phase. And runtime resume is always awaited before a PCI device is removed.)
However starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also called on a DPC event. Commit 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness of secondary bus after reset"), which introduced that, failed to appreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a reference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may indeed run concurrently. The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable kernels, so that's the oldest one affected.
Add the missing reference acquisition.
Abridged stack trace:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0 CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0 RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50 pci_dev_wait() pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() dpc_reset_link() pcie_do_recovery() dpc_handler()(CVE-2024-42302)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed
Syzbot reports a issue as follows:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe PGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0 Call Trace: <TASK> make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451 ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline] ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214 [...] ============================================
The immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry for the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of bounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.
do_split
unsigned split
dx_make_map
count = 1
split = count/2 = 0;
continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;
---> map[4294967295]
The maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024, so it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or equal to 2 when do_split() is called.
But syzbot's crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry distribution in dirblock is as follows:
bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free |xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............| 0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024
So when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole nor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is called.
In make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the dirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root because they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved to the new leaf block. That's why count is equal to 1.
Therefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity checks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above issue.(CVE-2024-42305)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer
[why & how] Need to make sure plane_state is initialized before accessing its members.
(cherry picked from commit 295d91cbc700651782a60572f83c24861607b648)(CVE-2024-42308)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
landlock: Don't lose track of restrictions on cred_transfer
When a process' cred struct is replaced, this almost always invokes the cred_prepare LSM hook; but in one special case (when KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT updates the parent's credentials), the cred_transfer LSM hook is used instead. Landlock only implements the cred_prepare hook, not cred_transfer, so KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT causes all information on Landlock restrictions to be lost.
This basically means that a process with the ability to use the fork() and keyctl() syscalls can get rid of all Landlock restrictions on itself.
Fix it by adding a cred_transfer hook that does the same thing as the existing cred_prepare hook. (Implemented by having hook_cred_prepare() call hook_cred_transfer() so that the two functions are less likely to accidentally diverge in the future.)(CVE-2024-42318)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs
This change rejects the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctls when called on a ucontrol VM. This is necessary since ucontrol VMs have kvm->arch.gmap set to 0 and would thus result in a null pointer dereference further in. Memory management needs to be performed in userspace and using the ioctls KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP and KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP.
Also improve s390 specific documentation for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2.
frankja@linux.ibm.com: commit message spelling fix, subject prefix fix
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit
When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable.
Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.
This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range().
Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi
Handle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi is valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()
An UAF can happen when /proc/cpuset is read as reported in [1].
This can be reproduced by the following methods: 1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the cgroup_path_ns function. 2.$cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset repeatly. 3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ $umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ repeatly.
The race that cause this bug can be shown as below:
(umount) | (cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset) css_release | proc_cpuset_show css_release_work_fn | css = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id); css_free_rwork_fn | cgroup_path_ns(css->cgroup, ...); cgroup_destroy_root | mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex); rebind_subsystems | cgroup_free_root | | // cgrp was freed, UAF | cgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);
When the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will allocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated &cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed, top_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.
The problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases where the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1 is cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is subsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be freed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never be released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted. This means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does not guarantee that css.cgrp->root will not be freed.
Fix this problem by using rcu_read_lock in proc_cpuset_show(). As cgroup_root is kfree_rcu after commit d23b5c577715 ("cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe"), css->cgroup won't be freed during the critical section. To call cgroup_path_ns_locked, css_set_lock is needed, so it is safe to replace task_get_css with task_css.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd(CVE-2024-43853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL
In imx_rproc_addr_init() "nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()" just counts number of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in the parsing loop (0 < a < nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Adjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: usb: qmi_wwan: fix memory leak for not ip packets
Free the unused skb when not ip packets arrive.(CVE-2024-43861)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Always drain health in shutdown callback
There is no point in recovery during device shutdown. if health work started need to wait for it to avoid races and NULL pointer access.
Hence, drain health WQ on shutdown callback.(CVE-2024-43866)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: handle 2x996 RU allocation in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he()
Currently NL80211_RATE_INFO_HE_RU_ALLOC_2x996 is not handled in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), leading to below warning:
kernel: invalid HE MCS: bw:6, ru:6 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2312 at net/wireless/util.c:1501 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he+0x22b/0x270 [cfg80211]
Fix it by handling 2x996 RU allocation in the same way as 160 MHz bandwidth.(CVE-2024-43879)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.
For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not set-id:
---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
to set-id and non-executable:
---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been disallowed.
While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
becomes:
-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom group members can setuid to root".
Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time, but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.(CVE-2024-43882)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-225.0.0.124.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit\r\n\r\nWhen using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction\ncommit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():\r\n\r\n $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:\n (...)\n static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...\n {\n (...)\n WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(\u0026amp;sb-\u0026gt;s_umount));\n (...)\n }\n (...)\r\n\r\nThe trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:\r\n\r\n [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3\n [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif\n [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186\n [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3\n [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)\n [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246\n [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000\n [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50\n [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000\n [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488\n [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460\n [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0\n [947.571072] Call Trace:\n [947.572354] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998\n [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e\n [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd\n [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156\n [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407\n [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139\n [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32\n [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n [947.597561] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---\r\n\r\nThis is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc\nwhen committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to\navoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made\nby commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 (\u0026quot;btrfs: don\u0026apos;t call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots\nin flushoncommit\u0026quot;). After that change we started producing that warning,\nand every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too\noften, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any\nproblem that might compromise the filesystem\u0026apos;s reliability.\r\n\r\nWe can not just lock the sb-\u0026gt;s_umount semaphore before calling\nwriteback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with\nfilesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()\nis called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can\ntrigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also\ntrigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could\nalso introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.\r\n\r\nTo fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of\nwriteback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb-\u0026gt;s_umount\nand then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.\nThis is fine because the cases where it can\u0026apos;t read lock sb-\u0026gt;s_umount\nare during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those\ncases sb-\u0026gt;s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which\ncalls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can\u0026apos;t\ntake a read lock on sb-\u0026gt;s_umount, writeback is already being triggered\nelsewhere.\r\n\r\nAn alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a\nnumber of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number\nof delalloc bytes we currently have, in \n---truncated---(CVE-2022-48920)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core\r\n\r\nThe seg6_input() function is responsible for adding the SRH into a\npacket, delegating the operation to the seg6_input_core(). This function\nuses the skb_cow_head() to ensure that there is sufficient headroom in\nthe sk_buff for accommodating the link-layer header.\nIn the event that the skb_cow_header() function fails, the\nseg6_input_core() catches the error but it does not release the sk_buff,\nwhich will result in a memory leak.\r\n\r\nThis issue was introduced in commit af3b5158b89d (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix BUG due\nto headroom too small after SRH push\u0026quot;) and persists even after commit\n7a3f5b0de364 (\u0026quot;netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane\u0026quot;),\nwhere the entire seg6_input() code was refactored to deal with netfilter\nhooks.\r\n\r\nThe proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by requiring the\nseg6_input_core() function to release the sk_buff in the event that\nskb_cow_head() fails.(CVE-2024-39490)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: add bounds checking to ocfs2_check_dir_entry()\r\n\r\nThis adds sanity checks for ocfs2_dir_entry to make sure all members of\nocfs2_dir_entry don\u0026apos;t stray beyond valid memory region.(CVE-2024-41015)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhfsplus: fix uninit-value in copy_name\r\n\r\n[syzbot reported]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160\n sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160\n copy_name+0x2af/0x320 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:411\n hfsplus_listxattr+0x11e9/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:750\n vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline]\n listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840\n path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline]\n __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline]\n __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline]\n __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873\n x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3877 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3918 [inline]\n kmalloc_trace+0x57b/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:4065\n kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:628 [inline]\n hfsplus_listxattr+0x4cc/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:699\n vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline]\n listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840\n path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline]\n __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline]\n __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline]\n __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873\n x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n[Fix]\nWhen allocating memory to strbuf, initialize memory to 0.(CVE-2024-41059)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/sclp: Fix sclp_init() cleanup on failure\r\n\r\nIf sclp_init() fails it only partially cleans up: if there are multiple\nfailing calls to sclp_init() sclp_state_change_event will be added several\ntimes to sclp_reg_list, which results in the following warning:\r\n\r\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nlist_add double add: new=000003ffe1598c10, prev=000003ffe1598bf0, next=000003ffe1598c10.\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8\nCPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3\nKrnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 000003ffe0d6076a (__list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8)\n R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3\n...\nCall Trace:\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d6076a\u0026gt;] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8\n([\u0026lt;000003ffe0d60766\u0026gt;] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8)\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0a8d37e\u0026gt;] sclp_init+0x40e/0x450\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe00009f2\u0026gt;] do_one_initcall+0x42/0x1e0\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe15b77a6\u0026gt;] do_initcalls+0x126/0x150\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe15b7a0a\u0026gt;] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ba/0x1f8\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d6650e\u0026gt;] kernel_init+0x2e/0x180\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe000301c\u0026gt;] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d759ca\u0026gt;] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30\r\n\r\nFix this by removing sclp_state_change_event from sclp_reg_list when\nsclp_init() fails.(CVE-2024-41068)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check pipe offset before setting vblank\r\n\r\npipe_ctx has a size of MAX_PIPES so checking its index before accessing\nthe array.\r\n\r\nThis fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-42120)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer check for kzalloc\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nCheck return pointer of kzalloc before using it.(CVE-2024-42122)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nprotect the fetch of -\u0026gt;fd[fd] in do_dup2() from mispredictions\r\n\r\nboth callers have verified that fd is not greater than -\u0026gt;max_fds;\nhowever, misprediction might end up with\n tofree = fdt-\u0026gt;fd[fd];\nbeing speculatively executed. That\u0026apos;s wrong for the same reasons\nwhy it\u0026apos;s wrong in close_fd()/file_close_fd_locked(); the same\nsolution applies - array_index_nospec(fd, fdt-\u0026gt;max_fds) could differ\nfrom fd only in case of speculative execution on mispredicted path.(CVE-2024-42265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()\r\n\r\niucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context.\niucv-\u0026gt;path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of\nsevering the path (or it is already removed / never existed).\nThis needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a\nsmall window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has\nalready been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by\niucv_tasklet_fn().\r\n\r\nExample:\n[452744.123844] Call Trace:\n[452744.123845] ([\u0026lt;0000001e87f03880\u0026gt;] 0x1e87f03880)\n[452744.123966] [\u0026lt;00000000d593001e\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138\n[452744.124330] [\u0026lt;000003ff801ddbca\u0026gt;] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124336] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e01b6\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124341] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e08cc\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124345] [\u0026lt;00000000d574794e\u0026gt;] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8\n[452744.124815] [\u0026lt;00000000d5747a0c\u0026gt;] sock_close+0x34/0x48\n[452744.124820] [\u0026lt;00000000d5421642\u0026gt;] __fput+0xba/0x268\n[452744.124826] [\u0026lt;00000000d51b382c\u0026gt;] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0\n[452744.124832] [\u0026lt;00000000d5145710\u0026gt;] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90\n[452744.124841] [\u0026lt;00000000d5978096\u0026gt;] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8\n[452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n[452744.125321] [\u0026lt;00000000d5930018\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138\n[452744.125324]\n[452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt\r\n\r\nNote that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against\nprocess context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and\ncorresponding handling is missing.\r\n\r\nIdeas for a future clean-up patch:\nA) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in\nRe-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the\ntasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.\r\n\r\nB) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t dereference *sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(*sp).(CVE-2024-42280)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Fix a segment issue when downgrading gso_size\r\n\r\nLinearize the skb when downgrading gso_size because it may trigger a\nBUG_ON() later when the skb is segmented as described in [1,2].(CVE-2024-42281)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str() on error\r\n\r\ntipc_udp_addr2str() should return non-zero value if the UDP media\naddress is invalid. Otherwise, a buffer overflow access can occur in\ntipc_media_addr_printf(). Fix this by returning 1 on an invalid UDP\nmedia address.(CVE-2024-42284)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/iwcm: Fix a use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs\r\n\r\niw_conn_req_handler() associates a new struct rdma_id_private (conn_id) with\nan existing struct iw_cm_id (cm_id) as follows:\r\n\r\n conn_id-\u0026gt;cm_id.iw = cm_id;\n cm_id-\u0026gt;context = conn_id;\n cm_id-\u0026gt;cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;\r\n\r\nrdma_destroy_id() frees both the cm_id and the struct rdma_id_private. Make\nsure that cm_work_handler() does not trigger a use-after-free by only\nfreeing of the struct rdma_id_private after all pending work has finished.(CVE-2024-42285)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: Fix for possible memory corruption\r\n\r\nInit Control Block is dereferenced incorrectly. Correctly dereference ICB(CVE-2024-42288)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to don\u0026apos;t dirty inode for readonly filesystem\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports f2fs bug as below:\r\n\r\nkernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:933!\nRIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x1576/0x1590 fs/f2fs/inode.c:933\nCall Trace:\n evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664\n dispose_list fs/inode.c:697 [inline]\n evict_inodes+0x5f8/0x690 fs/inode.c:747\n generic_shutdown_super+0x9d/0x2c0 fs/super.c:675\n kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1667\n kill_f2fs_super+0x303/0x3b0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4894\n deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x130 fs/super.c:484\n cleanup_mnt+0x426/0x4c0 fs/namespace.c:1256\n task_work_run+0x24a/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180\n ptrace_notify+0x2cd/0x380 kernel/signal.c:2399\n ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline]\n ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline]\n syscall_exit_work kernel/entry/common.c:251 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare kernel/entry/common.c:278 [inline]\n __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x15c/0x280 kernel/entry/common.c:296\n do_syscall_64+0x50/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:88\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nThe root cause is:\n- do_sys_open\n - f2fs_lookup\n - __f2fs_find_entry\n - f2fs_i_depth_write\n - f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync\n - f2fs_dirty_inode\n - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)\r\n\r\n- umount\n - kill_f2fs_super\n - kill_block_super\n - generic_shutdown_super\n - sync_filesystem\n : sb is readonly, skip sync_filesystem()\n - evict_inodes\n - iput\n - f2fs_evict_inode\n - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))\n : trigger kernel panic\r\n\r\nWhen we try to repair i_current_depth in readonly filesystem, let\u0026apos;s\nskip dirty inode to avoid panic in later f2fs_evict_inode().(CVE-2024-42297)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI/DPC: Fix use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal\r\n\r\nKeith reports a use-after-free when a DPC event occurs concurrently to\nhot-removal of the same portion of the hierarchy:\r\n\r\nThe dpc_handler() awaits readiness of the secondary bus below the\nDownstream Port where the DPC event occurred. To do so, it polls the\nconfig space of the first child device on the secondary bus. If that\nchild device is concurrently removed, accesses to its struct pci_dev\ncause the kernel to oops.\r\n\r\nThat\u0026apos;s because pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() neglects to hold a\nreference on the child device. Before v6.3, the function was only\ncalled on resume from system sleep or on runtime resume. Holding a\nreference wasn\u0026apos;t necessary back then because the pciehp IRQ thread\ncould never run concurrently. (On resume from system sleep, IRQs are\nnot enabled until after the resume_noirq phase. And runtime resume is\nalways awaited before a PCI device is removed.)\r\n\r\nHowever starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also\ncalled on a DPC event. Commit 53b54ad074de (\u0026quot;PCI/DPC: Await readiness\nof secondary bus after reset\u0026quot;), which introduced that, failed to\nappreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a\nreference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may\nindeed run concurrently. The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable\nkernels, so that\u0026apos;s the oldest one affected.\r\n\r\nAdd the missing reference acquisition.\r\n\r\nAbridged stack trace:\r\n\r\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0\n CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0\n RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50\n pci_dev_wait()\n pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus()\n dpc_reset_link()\n pcie_do_recovery()\n dpc_handler()(CVE-2024-42302)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports a issue as follows:\n============================================\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe\nPGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341\n ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451\n ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline]\n ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214\n[...]\n============================================\r\n\r\nThe immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry\nfor the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of\nbounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.\r\n\r\n do_split\n unsigned split\n dx_make_map\n count = 1\n split = count/2 = 0;\n continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;\n ---\u0026gt; map[4294967295]\r\n\r\nThe maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024,\nso it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or\nequal to 2 when do_split() is called.\r\n\r\nBut syzbot\u0026apos;s crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry\ndistribution in dirblock is as follows:\r\n\r\n bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free\n|xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............|\n0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024\r\n\r\nSo when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole\nnor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is\ncalled.\r\n\r\nIn make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the\ndirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root\nbecause they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved\nto the new leaf block. That\u0026apos;s why count is equal to 1.\r\n\r\nTherefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity\nchecks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above\nissue.(CVE-2024-42305)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer\r\n\r\n[why \u0026amp; how]\nNeed to make sure plane_state is initialized\nbefore accessing its members.\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 295d91cbc700651782a60572f83c24861607b648)(CVE-2024-42308)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlandlock: Don\u0026apos;t lose track of restrictions on cred_transfer\r\n\r\nWhen a process\u0026apos; cred struct is replaced, this _almost_ always invokes\nthe cred_prepare LSM hook; but in one special case (when\nKEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT updates the parent\u0026apos;s credentials), the\ncred_transfer LSM hook is used instead. Landlock only implements the\ncred_prepare hook, not cred_transfer, so KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT causes\nall information on Landlock restrictions to be lost.\r\n\r\nThis basically means that a process with the ability to use the fork()\nand keyctl() syscalls can get rid of all Landlock restrictions on\nitself.\r\n\r\nFix it by adding a cred_transfer hook that does the same thing as the\nexisting cred_prepare hook. (Implemented by having hook_cred_prepare()\ncall hook_cred_transfer() so that the two functions are less likely to\naccidentally diverge in the future.)(CVE-2024-42318)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs\r\n\r\nThis change rejects the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and\nKVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctls when called on a ucontrol VM.\nThis is necessary since ucontrol VMs have kvm-\u0026gt;arch.gmap set to 0 and\nwould thus result in a null pointer dereference further in.\nMemory management needs to be performed in userspace and using the\nioctls KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP and KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP.\r\n\r\nAlso improve s390 specific documentation for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION\nand KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2.\r\n\r\n[frankja@linux.ibm.com: commit message spelling fix, subject prefix fix](CVE-2024-43819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit\r\n\r\nWhen doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an\nuninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does\nnot detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will\nreturn immediately without initializing the \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; variable.\r\n\r\nBecause \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an\ninfinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.\r\n\r\nThis commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure\nin function ext4_es_find_extent_range().\r\n\r\nThanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\r\n\r\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()\r\n\r\nAn UAF can happen when /proc/cpuset is read as reported in [1].\r\n\r\nThis can be reproduced by the following methods:\n1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the\n cgroup_path_ns function.\n2.$cat /proc/\u0026lt;pid\u0026gt;/cpuset repeatly.\n3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/\n$umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ repeatly.\r\n\r\nThe race that cause this bug can be shown as below:\r\n\r\n(umount)\t\t|\t(cat /proc/\u0026lt;pid\u0026gt;/cpuset)\ncss_release\t\t|\tproc_cpuset_show\ncss_release_work_fn\t|\tcss = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id);\ncss_free_rwork_fn\t|\tcgroup_path_ns(css-\u0026gt;cgroup, ...);\ncgroup_destroy_root\t|\tmutex_lock(\u0026amp;cgroup_mutex);\nrebind_subsystems\t|\ncgroup_free_root \t|\n\t\t\t|\t// cgrp was freed, UAF\n\t\t\t|\tcgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);\r\n\r\nWhen the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp\nwill point to \u0026amp;cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will\nallocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated\n\u0026amp;cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed,\ntop_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to \u0026amp;cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases\nwhere the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1\nis cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is\nsubsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be\nfreed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never\nbe released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted.\nThis means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does\nnot guarantee that css.cgrp-\u0026gt;root will not be freed.\r\n\r\nFix this problem by using rcu_read_lock in proc_cpuset_show().\nAs cgroup_root is kfree_rcu after commit d23b5c577715\n(\u0026quot;cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe\u0026quot;),\ncss-\u0026gt;cgroup won\u0026apos;t be freed during the critical section.\nTo call cgroup_path_ns_locked, css_set_lock is needed, so it is safe to\nreplace task_get_css with task_css.\r\n\r\n[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd(CVE-2024-43853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nremoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL\r\n\r\nIn imx_rproc_addr_init() \u0026quot;nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()\u0026quot; just counts\nnumber of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in\nthe parsing loop (0 \u0026lt; a \u0026lt; nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced.\nAdjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters](CVE-2024-43860)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: usb: qmi_wwan: fix memory leak for not ip packets\r\n\r\nFree the unused skb when not ip packets arrive.(CVE-2024-43861)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Always drain health in shutdown callback\r\n\r\nThere is no point in recovery during device shutdown. if health\nwork started need to wait for it to avoid races and NULL pointer\naccess.\r\n\r\nHence, drain health WQ on shutdown callback.(CVE-2024-43866)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: handle 2x996 RU allocation in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he()\r\n\r\nCurrently NL80211_RATE_INFO_HE_RU_ALLOC_2x996 is not handled in\ncfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), leading to below warning:\r\n\r\nkernel: invalid HE MCS: bw:6, ru:6\nkernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2312 at net/wireless/util.c:1501 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he+0x22b/0x270 [cfg80211]\r\n\r\nFix it by handling 2x996 RU allocation in the same way as 160 MHz bandwidth.(CVE-2024-43879)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nexec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage\r\n\r\nWhen opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is\ndone against the file\u0026apos;s metadata at that moment, and on success, a file\npointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file\nmetadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how\nto set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the\npermissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.\r\n\r\nFor example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not\nset-id:\r\n\r\n---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nto set-id and non-executable:\r\n\r\n---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nit is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been\ndisallowed.\r\n\r\nWhile this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been\nobserved (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating\nthe setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being\nworld-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid\nbit. For example, \u0026quot;chmod o-x,u+s target\u0026quot; makes \u0026quot;target\u0026quot; executable only\nby uid \u0026quot;root\u0026quot; and gid \u0026quot;cdrom\u0026quot;, while also becoming setuid-root:\r\n\r\n-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nbecomes:\r\n\r\n-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nBut racing the chmod means users without group \u0026quot;cdrom\u0026quot; membership can\nget the permission to execute \u0026quot;target\u0026quot; just before the chmod, and when\nthe chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the\nsetuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of \u0026quot;only cdrom\ngroup members can setuid to root\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nRe-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata\nhas changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,\nbut until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a\nfull inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that\nthis is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.(CVE-2024-43882)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2077",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:33Z",
"published": "2024-08-30T11:07:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2077"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42288"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42297"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42302"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42308"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42318"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43882"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48920",
"CVE-2024-39490",
"CVE-2024-41015",
"CVE-2024-41059",
"CVE-2024-41068",
"CVE-2024-42120",
"CVE-2024-42122",
"CVE-2024-42265",
"CVE-2024-42271",
"CVE-2024-42280",
"CVE-2024-42281",
"CVE-2024-42284",
"CVE-2024-42285",
"CVE-2024-42288",
"CVE-2024-42297",
"CVE-2024-42302",
"CVE-2024-42305",
"CVE-2024-42308",
"CVE-2024-42318",
"CVE-2024-43819",
"CVE-2024-43828",
"CVE-2024-43831",
"CVE-2024-43853",
"CVE-2024-43860",
"CVE-2024-43861",
"CVE-2024-43866",
"CVE-2024-43879",
"CVE-2024-43882"
]
}
oesa-2024-2078
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():
$ cat fs/fs-writeback.c: (...) static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ... { (...) WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)); (...) } (...)
The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:
[947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186 [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...) [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50 [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000 [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488 [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460 [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0 [947.571072] Call Trace: [947.572354] <TASK> [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998 [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156 [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407 [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139 [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32 [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [947.597561] </TASK> [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---
This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made by commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning, and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.
We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem() is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.
To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it. This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered elsewhere.
An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number of delalloc bytes we currently have, in ---truncated---(CVE-2022-48920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: unregister flowtable hooks on netns exit
Unregister flowtable hooks before they are releases via nf_tables_flowtable_destroy() otherwise hook core reports UAF.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142 Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880736f7438 by task syz-executor579/3666
CPU: 0 PID: 3666 Comm: syz-executor579 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack_lvl+0x1dc/0x2d8 lib/dump_stack.c:106 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x65/0x380 mm/kasan/report.c:247 mm/kasan/report.c:247 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline] __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline] mm/kasan/report.c:450 kasan_report+0x19a/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:450 mm/kasan/report.c:450 nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142 __nf_register_net_hook+0x27e/0x8d0 net/netfilter/core.c:429 net/netfilter/core.c:429 nf_register_net_hook+0xaa/0x180 net/netfilter/core.c:571 net/netfilter/core.c:571 nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks+0x3c5/0x730 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232 nf_tables_newflowtable+0x2022/0x2cf0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430 nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline] nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline] nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 nfnetlink_rcv+0x10e6/0x2550 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652
__nft_release_hook() calls nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks() which only unregisters the hooks, then after RCU grace period, it is guaranteed that no packets add new entries to the flowtable (no flow offload rules and flowtable hooks are reachable from packet path), so it is safe to call nf_flow_table_free() which cleans up the remaining entries from the flowtable (both software and hardware) and it unbinds the flow_block.(CVE-2022-48935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation
fill_route() stores three components in the skb:
- struct rtmsg
- RTA_DST (u8)
- RTA_OIF (u32)
Therefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use
NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) + nla_total_size(1) + nla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and 'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0. Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit 533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()") but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here - this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).(CVE-2024-38613)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core
The seg6_input() function is responsible for adding the SRH into a packet, delegating the operation to the seg6_input_core(). This function uses the skb_cow_head() to ensure that there is sufficient headroom in the sk_buff for accommodating the link-layer header. In the event that the skb_cow_header() function fails, the seg6_input_core() catches the error but it does not release the sk_buff, which will result in a memory leak.
This issue was introduced in commit af3b5158b89d ("ipv6: sr: fix BUG due to headroom too small after SRH push") and persists even after commit 7a3f5b0de364 ("netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane"), where the entire seg6_input() code was refactored to deal with netfilter hooks.
The proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by requiring the seg6_input_core() function to release the sk_buff in the event that skb_cow_head() fails.(CVE-2024-39490)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: hisilicon/sec - Fix memory leak for sec resource release
The AIV is one of the SEC resources. When releasing resources, it need to release the AIV resources at the same time. Otherwise, memory leakage occurs.
The aiv resource release is added to the sec resource release function.(CVE-2024-41002)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: add bounds checking to ocfs2_check_dir_entry()
This adds sanity checks for ocfs2_dir_entry to make sure all members of ocfs2_dir_entry don't stray beyond valid memory region.(CVE-2024-41015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hfsplus: fix uninit-value in copy_name
[syzbot reported] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160 sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160 copy_name+0x2af/0x320 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:411 hfsplus_listxattr+0x11e9/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:750 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline] listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline] __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline] __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline] __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873 x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3877 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3918 [inline] kmalloc_trace+0x57b/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:4065 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:628 [inline] hfsplus_listxattr+0x4cc/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:699 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline] listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline] __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline] __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline] __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873 x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Fix] When allocating memory to strbuf, initialize memory to 0.(CVE-2024-41059)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/sclp: Fix sclp_init() cleanup on failure
If sclp_init() fails it only partially cleans up: if there are multiple failing calls to sclp_init() sclp_state_change_event will be added several times to sclp_reg_list, which results in the following warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------ list_add double add: new=000003ffe1598c10, prev=000003ffe1598bf0, next=000003ffe1598c10. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3 Krnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 000003ffe0d6076a (__list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8) R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 ... Call Trace: [<000003ffe0d6076a>] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8 ([<000003ffe0d60766>] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8) [<000003ffe0a8d37e>] sclp_init+0x40e/0x450 [<000003ffe00009f2>] do_one_initcall+0x42/0x1e0 [<000003ffe15b77a6>] do_initcalls+0x126/0x150 [<000003ffe15b7a0a>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ba/0x1f8 [<000003ffe0d6650e>] kernel_init+0x2e/0x180 [<000003ffe000301c>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [<000003ffe0d759ca>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
Fix this by removing sclp_state_change_event from sclp_reg_list when sclp_init() fails.(CVE-2024-41068)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check pipe offset before setting vblank
pipe_ctx has a size of MAX_PIPES so checking its index before accessing the array.
This fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-42120)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer check for kzalloc
[Why & How] Check return pointer of kzalloc before using it.(CVE-2024-42122)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
protect the fetch of ->fd[fd] in do_dup2() from mispredictions
both callers have verified that fd is not greater than ->max_fds; however, misprediction might end up with tofree = fdt->fd[fd]; being speculatively executed. That's wrong for the same reasons why it's wrong in close_fd()/file_close_fd_locked(); the same solution applies - array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds) could differ from fd only in case of speculative execution on mispredicted path.(CVE-2024-42265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()
iucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context. iucv->path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of severing the path (or it is already removed / never existed). This needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a small window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has already been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by iucv_tasklet_fn().
Example: [452744.123844] Call Trace: [452744.123845] ([<0000001e87f03880>] 0x1e87f03880) [452744.123966] [<00000000d593001e>] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138 [452744.124330] [<000003ff801ddbca>] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124336] [<000003ff801e01b6>] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv] [452744.124341] [<000003ff801e08cc>] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124345] [<00000000d574794e>] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8 [452744.124815] [<00000000d5747a0c>] sock_close+0x34/0x48 [452744.124820] [<00000000d5421642>] __fput+0xba/0x268 [452744.124826] [<00000000d51b382c>] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0 [452744.124832] [<00000000d5145710>] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90 [452744.124841] [<00000000d5978096>] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8 [452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [452744.125321] [<00000000d5930018>] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138 [452744.125324] [452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Note that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against process context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and corresponding handling is missing.
Ideas for a future clean-up patch: A) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in Re-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the tasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.
B) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()
Don't dereference sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(sp).(CVE-2024-42280)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix a segment issue when downgrading gso_size
Linearize the skb when downgrading gso_size because it may trigger a BUG_ON() later when the skb is segmented as described in [1,2].(CVE-2024-42281)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str() on error
tipc_udp_addr2str() should return non-zero value if the UDP media address is invalid. Otherwise, a buffer overflow access can occur in tipc_media_addr_printf(). Fix this by returning 1 on an invalid UDP media address.(CVE-2024-42284)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/iwcm: Fix a use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs
iw_conn_req_handler() associates a new struct rdma_id_private (conn_id) with an existing struct iw_cm_id (cm_id) as follows:
conn_id->cm_id.iw = cm_id;
cm_id->context = conn_id;
cm_id->cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;
rdma_destroy_id() frees both the cm_id and the struct rdma_id_private. Make sure that cm_work_handler() does not trigger a use-after-free by only freeing of the struct rdma_id_private after all pending work has finished.(CVE-2024-42285)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Fix for possible memory corruption
Init Control Block is dereferenced incorrectly. Correctly dereference ICB(CVE-2024-42288)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to don't dirty inode for readonly filesystem
syzbot reports f2fs bug as below:
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:933! RIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x1576/0x1590 fs/f2fs/inode.c:933 Call Trace: evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664 dispose_list fs/inode.c:697 [inline] evict_inodes+0x5f8/0x690 fs/inode.c:747 generic_shutdown_super+0x9d/0x2c0 fs/super.c:675 kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1667 kill_f2fs_super+0x303/0x3b0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4894 deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x130 fs/super.c:484 cleanup_mnt+0x426/0x4c0 fs/namespace.c:1256 task_work_run+0x24a/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 ptrace_notify+0x2cd/0x380 kernel/signal.c:2399 ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline] ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline] syscall_exit_work kernel/entry/common.c:251 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare kernel/entry/common.c:278 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x15c/0x280 kernel/entry/common.c:296 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:88 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
The root cause is: - do_sys_open - f2fs_lookup - __f2fs_find_entry - f2fs_i_depth_write - f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync - f2fs_dirty_inode - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)
- umount
- kill_f2fs_super
- kill_block_super
- generic_shutdown_super
- sync_filesystem : sb is readonly, skip sync_filesystem()
- evict_inodes
- iput
- f2fs_evict_inode
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)) : trigger kernel panic
When we try to repair i_current_depth in readonly filesystem, let's skip dirty inode to avoid panic in later f2fs_evict_inode().(CVE-2024-42297)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/DPC: Fix use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal
Keith reports a use-after-free when a DPC event occurs concurrently to hot-removal of the same portion of the hierarchy:
The dpc_handler() awaits readiness of the secondary bus below the Downstream Port where the DPC event occurred. To do so, it polls the config space of the first child device on the secondary bus. If that child device is concurrently removed, accesses to its struct pci_dev cause the kernel to oops.
That's because pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() neglects to hold a reference on the child device. Before v6.3, the function was only called on resume from system sleep or on runtime resume. Holding a reference wasn't necessary back then because the pciehp IRQ thread could never run concurrently. (On resume from system sleep, IRQs are not enabled until after the resume_noirq phase. And runtime resume is always awaited before a PCI device is removed.)
However starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also called on a DPC event. Commit 53b54ad074de ("PCI/DPC: Await readiness of secondary bus after reset"), which introduced that, failed to appreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a reference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may indeed run concurrently. The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable kernels, so that's the oldest one affected.
Add the missing reference acquisition.
Abridged stack trace:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0 CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0 RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50 pci_dev_wait() pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() dpc_reset_link() pcie_do_recovery() dpc_handler()(CVE-2024-42302)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed
Syzbot reports a issue as follows:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe PGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0 Call Trace: <TASK> make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451 ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline] ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214 [...] ============================================
The immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry for the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of bounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.
do_split
unsigned split
dx_make_map
count = 1
split = count/2 = 0;
continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;
---> map[4294967295]
The maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024, so it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or equal to 2 when do_split() is called.
But syzbot's crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry distribution in dirblock is as follows:
bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free |xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............| 0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024
So when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole nor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is called.
In make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the dirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root because they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved to the new leaf block. That's why count is equal to 1.
Therefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity checks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above issue.(CVE-2024-42305)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer
[why & how] Need to make sure plane_state is initialized before accessing its members.
(cherry picked from commit 295d91cbc700651782a60572f83c24861607b648)(CVE-2024-42308)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
landlock: Don't lose track of restrictions on cred_transfer
When a process' cred struct is replaced, this almost always invokes the cred_prepare LSM hook; but in one special case (when KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT updates the parent's credentials), the cred_transfer LSM hook is used instead. Landlock only implements the cred_prepare hook, not cred_transfer, so KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT causes all information on Landlock restrictions to be lost.
This basically means that a process with the ability to use the fork() and keyctl() syscalls can get rid of all Landlock restrictions on itself.
Fix it by adding a cred_transfer hook that does the same thing as the existing cred_prepare hook. (Implemented by having hook_cred_prepare() call hook_cred_transfer() so that the two functions are less likely to accidentally diverge in the future.)(CVE-2024-42318)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs
This change rejects the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctls when called on a ucontrol VM. This is necessary since ucontrol VMs have kvm->arch.gmap set to 0 and would thus result in a null pointer dereference further in. Memory management needs to be performed in userspace and using the ioctls KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP and KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP.
Also improve s390 specific documentation for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2.
frankja@linux.ibm.com: commit message spelling fix, subject prefix fix
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit
When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable.
Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.
This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range().
Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi
Handle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi is valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()
An UAF can happen when /proc/cpuset is read as reported in [1].
This can be reproduced by the following methods: 1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the cgroup_path_ns function. 2.$cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset repeatly. 3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ $umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ repeatly.
The race that cause this bug can be shown as below:
(umount) | (cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset) css_release | proc_cpuset_show css_release_work_fn | css = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id); css_free_rwork_fn | cgroup_path_ns(css->cgroup, ...); cgroup_destroy_root | mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex); rebind_subsystems | cgroup_free_root | | // cgrp was freed, UAF | cgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);
When the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will allocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated &cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed, top_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.
The problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases where the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1 is cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is subsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be freed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never be released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted. This means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does not guarantee that css.cgrp->root will not be freed.
Fix this problem by using rcu_read_lock in proc_cpuset_show(). As cgroup_root is kfree_rcu after commit d23b5c577715 ("cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe"), css->cgroup won't be freed during the critical section. To call cgroup_path_ns_locked, css_set_lock is needed, so it is safe to replace task_get_css with task_css.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd(CVE-2024-43853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL
In imx_rproc_addr_init() "nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()" just counts number of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in the parsing loop (0 < a < nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Adjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: usb: qmi_wwan: fix memory leak for not ip packets
Free the unused skb when not ip packets arrive.(CVE-2024-43861)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Always drain health in shutdown callback
There is no point in recovery during device shutdown. if health work started need to wait for it to avoid races and NULL pointer access.
Hence, drain health WQ on shutdown callback.(CVE-2024-43866)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: handle 2x996 RU allocation in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he()
Currently NL80211_RATE_INFO_HE_RU_ALLOC_2x996 is not handled in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), leading to below warning:
kernel: invalid HE MCS: bw:6, ru:6 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2312 at net/wireless/util.c:1501 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he+0x22b/0x270 [cfg80211]
Fix it by handling 2x996 RU allocation in the same way as 160 MHz bandwidth.(CVE-2024-43879)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.
For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not set-id:
---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
to set-id and non-executable:
---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been disallowed.
While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
becomes:
-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom group members can setuid to root".
Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time, but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.(CVE-2024-43882)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-225.0.0.128.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit\r\n\r\nWhen using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction\ncommit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():\r\n\r\n $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:\n (...)\n static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...\n {\n (...)\n WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(\u0026amp;sb-\u0026gt;s_umount));\n (...)\n }\n (...)\r\n\r\nThe trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:\r\n\r\n [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3\n [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif\n [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186\n [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3\n [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)\n [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246\n [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000\n [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50\n [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000\n [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488\n [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460\n [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0\n [947.571072] Call Trace:\n [947.572354] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998\n [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e\n [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd\n [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156\n [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407\n [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139\n [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32\n [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n [947.597561] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---\r\n\r\nThis is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc\nwhen committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to\navoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made\nby commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 (\u0026quot;btrfs: don\u0026apos;t call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots\nin flushoncommit\u0026quot;). After that change we started producing that warning,\nand every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too\noften, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any\nproblem that might compromise the filesystem\u0026apos;s reliability.\r\n\r\nWe can not just lock the sb-\u0026gt;s_umount semaphore before calling\nwriteback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with\nfilesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()\nis called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can\ntrigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also\ntrigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could\nalso introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.\r\n\r\nTo fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of\nwriteback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb-\u0026gt;s_umount\nand then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.\nThis is fine because the cases where it can\u0026apos;t read lock sb-\u0026gt;s_umount\nare during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those\ncases sb-\u0026gt;s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which\ncalls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can\u0026apos;t\ntake a read lock on sb-\u0026gt;s_umount, writeback is already being triggered\nelsewhere.\r\n\r\nAn alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a\nnumber of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number\nof delalloc bytes we currently have, in \n---truncated---(CVE-2022-48920)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: unregister flowtable hooks on netns exit\r\n\r\nUnregister flowtable hooks before they are releases via\nnf_tables_flowtable_destroy() otherwise hook core reports UAF.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff8880736f7438 by task syz-executor579/3666\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 3666 Comm: syz-executor579 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] lib/dump_stack.c:106\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1dc/0x2d8 lib/dump_stack.c:106 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description+0x65/0x380 mm/kasan/report.c:247 mm/kasan/report.c:247\n __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline]\n __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline] mm/kasan/report.c:450\n kasan_report+0x19a/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:450 mm/kasan/report.c:450\n nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142\n __nf_register_net_hook+0x27e/0x8d0 net/netfilter/core.c:429 net/netfilter/core.c:429\n nf_register_net_hook+0xaa/0x180 net/netfilter/core.c:571 net/netfilter/core.c:571\n nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks+0x3c5/0x730 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232\n nf_tables_newflowtable+0x2022/0x2cf0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430\n nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline]\n nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline]\n nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652\n nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652\n nfnetlink_rcv+0x10e6/0x2550 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652\r\n\r\n__nft_release_hook() calls nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks() which\nonly unregisters the hooks, then after RCU grace period, it is\nguaranteed that no packets add new entries to the flowtable (no flow\noffload rules and flowtable hooks are reachable from packet path), so it\nis safe to call nf_flow_table_free() which cleans up the remaining\nentries from the flowtable (both software and hardware) and it unbinds\nthe flow_block.(CVE-2022-48935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation\r\n\r\nfill_route() stores three components in the skb:\r\n\r\n- struct rtmsg\n- RTA_DST (u8)\n- RTA_OIF (u32)\r\n\r\nTherefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use\r\n\r\nNLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) +\nnla_total_size(1) +\nnla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nm68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation\r\n\r\nContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across\nthe switch from \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; to \u0026apos;next\u0026apos; tasks. This does rely on interrupts\nremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.\r\n\r\nThis condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context\nswitching between already running processes, because both \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; and\n\u0026apos;next\u0026apos; already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the\nstatus register.\r\n\r\nThe situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status\nregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.\nUpon restoring the \u0026apos;next\u0026apos; thread\u0026apos;s status register in switch_to() aka\nresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then\nreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue\nlock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).\r\n\r\nA timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released\nin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the\ncurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as\nreported by Guenter Roeck.\r\n\r\nAs far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit\n533e6903bea0 (\u0026quot;m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()\u0026quot;)\nbut I haven\u0026apos;t done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well\npredate that commit.\r\n\r\nInterrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for\nkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when\nfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when\nswitching the tasks\u0026apos; register sets in resume().\r\n\r\nNote that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here\n- this leaves enough of a race for the \u0026apos;spinlock recursion\u0026apos; warning to\nstill be observed.\r\n\r\nTested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).(CVE-2024-38613)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core\r\n\r\nThe seg6_input() function is responsible for adding the SRH into a\npacket, delegating the operation to the seg6_input_core(). This function\nuses the skb_cow_head() to ensure that there is sufficient headroom in\nthe sk_buff for accommodating the link-layer header.\nIn the event that the skb_cow_header() function fails, the\nseg6_input_core() catches the error but it does not release the sk_buff,\nwhich will result in a memory leak.\r\n\r\nThis issue was introduced in commit af3b5158b89d (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix BUG due\nto headroom too small after SRH push\u0026quot;) and persists even after commit\n7a3f5b0de364 (\u0026quot;netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane\u0026quot;),\nwhere the entire seg6_input() code was refactored to deal with netfilter\nhooks.\r\n\r\nThe proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by requiring the\nseg6_input_core() function to release the sk_buff in the event that\nskb_cow_head() fails.(CVE-2024-39490)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: hisilicon/sec - Fix memory leak for sec resource release\r\n\r\nThe AIV is one of the SEC resources. When releasing resources,\nit need to release the AIV resources at the same time.\nOtherwise, memory leakage occurs.\r\n\r\nThe aiv resource release is added to the sec resource release\nfunction.(CVE-2024-41002)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: add bounds checking to ocfs2_check_dir_entry()\r\n\r\nThis adds sanity checks for ocfs2_dir_entry to make sure all members of\nocfs2_dir_entry don\u0026apos;t stray beyond valid memory region.(CVE-2024-41015)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhfsplus: fix uninit-value in copy_name\r\n\r\n[syzbot reported]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160\n sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160\n copy_name+0x2af/0x320 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:411\n hfsplus_listxattr+0x11e9/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:750\n vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline]\n listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840\n path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline]\n __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline]\n __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline]\n __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873\n x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3877 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3918 [inline]\n kmalloc_trace+0x57b/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:4065\n kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:628 [inline]\n hfsplus_listxattr+0x4cc/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:699\n vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline]\n listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840\n path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline]\n __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline]\n __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline]\n __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873\n x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n[Fix]\nWhen allocating memory to strbuf, initialize memory to 0.(CVE-2024-41059)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/sclp: Fix sclp_init() cleanup on failure\r\n\r\nIf sclp_init() fails it only partially cleans up: if there are multiple\nfailing calls to sclp_init() sclp_state_change_event will be added several\ntimes to sclp_reg_list, which results in the following warning:\r\n\r\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nlist_add double add: new=000003ffe1598c10, prev=000003ffe1598bf0, next=000003ffe1598c10.\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8\nCPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3\nKrnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 000003ffe0d6076a (__list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8)\n R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3\n...\nCall Trace:\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d6076a\u0026gt;] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8\n([\u0026lt;000003ffe0d60766\u0026gt;] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8)\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0a8d37e\u0026gt;] sclp_init+0x40e/0x450\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe00009f2\u0026gt;] do_one_initcall+0x42/0x1e0\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe15b77a6\u0026gt;] do_initcalls+0x126/0x150\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe15b7a0a\u0026gt;] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ba/0x1f8\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d6650e\u0026gt;] kernel_init+0x2e/0x180\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe000301c\u0026gt;] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d759ca\u0026gt;] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30\r\n\r\nFix this by removing sclp_state_change_event from sclp_reg_list when\nsclp_init() fails.(CVE-2024-41068)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check pipe offset before setting vblank\r\n\r\npipe_ctx has a size of MAX_PIPES so checking its index before accessing\nthe array.\r\n\r\nThis fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-42120)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer check for kzalloc\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nCheck return pointer of kzalloc before using it.(CVE-2024-42122)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nprotect the fetch of -\u0026gt;fd[fd] in do_dup2() from mispredictions\r\n\r\nboth callers have verified that fd is not greater than -\u0026gt;max_fds;\nhowever, misprediction might end up with\n tofree = fdt-\u0026gt;fd[fd];\nbeing speculatively executed. That\u0026apos;s wrong for the same reasons\nwhy it\u0026apos;s wrong in close_fd()/file_close_fd_locked(); the same\nsolution applies - array_index_nospec(fd, fdt-\u0026gt;max_fds) could differ\nfrom fd only in case of speculative execution on mispredicted path.(CVE-2024-42265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()\r\n\r\niucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context.\niucv-\u0026gt;path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of\nsevering the path (or it is already removed / never existed).\nThis needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a\nsmall window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has\nalready been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by\niucv_tasklet_fn().\r\n\r\nExample:\n[452744.123844] Call Trace:\n[452744.123845] ([\u0026lt;0000001e87f03880\u0026gt;] 0x1e87f03880)\n[452744.123966] [\u0026lt;00000000d593001e\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138\n[452744.124330] [\u0026lt;000003ff801ddbca\u0026gt;] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124336] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e01b6\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124341] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e08cc\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124345] [\u0026lt;00000000d574794e\u0026gt;] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8\n[452744.124815] [\u0026lt;00000000d5747a0c\u0026gt;] sock_close+0x34/0x48\n[452744.124820] [\u0026lt;00000000d5421642\u0026gt;] __fput+0xba/0x268\n[452744.124826] [\u0026lt;00000000d51b382c\u0026gt;] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0\n[452744.124832] [\u0026lt;00000000d5145710\u0026gt;] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90\n[452744.124841] [\u0026lt;00000000d5978096\u0026gt;] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8\n[452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n[452744.125321] [\u0026lt;00000000d5930018\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138\n[452744.125324]\n[452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt\r\n\r\nNote that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against\nprocess context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and\ncorresponding handling is missing.\r\n\r\nIdeas for a future clean-up patch:\nA) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in\nRe-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the\ntasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.\r\n\r\nB) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t dereference *sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(*sp).(CVE-2024-42280)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Fix a segment issue when downgrading gso_size\r\n\r\nLinearize the skb when downgrading gso_size because it may trigger a\nBUG_ON() later when the skb is segmented as described in [1,2].(CVE-2024-42281)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str() on error\r\n\r\ntipc_udp_addr2str() should return non-zero value if the UDP media\naddress is invalid. Otherwise, a buffer overflow access can occur in\ntipc_media_addr_printf(). Fix this by returning 1 on an invalid UDP\nmedia address.(CVE-2024-42284)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/iwcm: Fix a use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs\r\n\r\niw_conn_req_handler() associates a new struct rdma_id_private (conn_id) with\nan existing struct iw_cm_id (cm_id) as follows:\r\n\r\n conn_id-\u0026gt;cm_id.iw = cm_id;\n cm_id-\u0026gt;context = conn_id;\n cm_id-\u0026gt;cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;\r\n\r\nrdma_destroy_id() frees both the cm_id and the struct rdma_id_private. Make\nsure that cm_work_handler() does not trigger a use-after-free by only\nfreeing of the struct rdma_id_private after all pending work has finished.(CVE-2024-42285)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: Fix for possible memory corruption\r\n\r\nInit Control Block is dereferenced incorrectly. Correctly dereference ICB(CVE-2024-42288)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to don\u0026apos;t dirty inode for readonly filesystem\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports f2fs bug as below:\r\n\r\nkernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:933!\nRIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x1576/0x1590 fs/f2fs/inode.c:933\nCall Trace:\n evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664\n dispose_list fs/inode.c:697 [inline]\n evict_inodes+0x5f8/0x690 fs/inode.c:747\n generic_shutdown_super+0x9d/0x2c0 fs/super.c:675\n kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1667\n kill_f2fs_super+0x303/0x3b0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4894\n deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x130 fs/super.c:484\n cleanup_mnt+0x426/0x4c0 fs/namespace.c:1256\n task_work_run+0x24a/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180\n ptrace_notify+0x2cd/0x380 kernel/signal.c:2399\n ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline]\n ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline]\n syscall_exit_work kernel/entry/common.c:251 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare kernel/entry/common.c:278 [inline]\n __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x15c/0x280 kernel/entry/common.c:296\n do_syscall_64+0x50/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:88\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nThe root cause is:\n- do_sys_open\n - f2fs_lookup\n - __f2fs_find_entry\n - f2fs_i_depth_write\n - f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync\n - f2fs_dirty_inode\n - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)\r\n\r\n- umount\n - kill_f2fs_super\n - kill_block_super\n - generic_shutdown_super\n - sync_filesystem\n : sb is readonly, skip sync_filesystem()\n - evict_inodes\n - iput\n - f2fs_evict_inode\n - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))\n : trigger kernel panic\r\n\r\nWhen we try to repair i_current_depth in readonly filesystem, let\u0026apos;s\nskip dirty inode to avoid panic in later f2fs_evict_inode().(CVE-2024-42297)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI/DPC: Fix use-after-free on concurrent DPC and hot-removal\r\n\r\nKeith reports a use-after-free when a DPC event occurs concurrently to\nhot-removal of the same portion of the hierarchy:\r\n\r\nThe dpc_handler() awaits readiness of the secondary bus below the\nDownstream Port where the DPC event occurred. To do so, it polls the\nconfig space of the first child device on the secondary bus. If that\nchild device is concurrently removed, accesses to its struct pci_dev\ncause the kernel to oops.\r\n\r\nThat\u0026apos;s because pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() neglects to hold a\nreference on the child device. Before v6.3, the function was only\ncalled on resume from system sleep or on runtime resume. Holding a\nreference wasn\u0026apos;t necessary back then because the pciehp IRQ thread\ncould never run concurrently. (On resume from system sleep, IRQs are\nnot enabled until after the resume_noirq phase. And runtime resume is\nalways awaited before a PCI device is removed.)\r\n\r\nHowever starting with v6.3, pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is also\ncalled on a DPC event. Commit 53b54ad074de (\u0026quot;PCI/DPC: Await readiness\nof secondary bus after reset\u0026quot;), which introduced that, failed to\nappreciate that pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() now needs to hold a\nreference on the child device because dpc_handler() and pciehp may\nindeed run concurrently. The commit was backported to v5.10+ stable\nkernels, so that\u0026apos;s the oldest one affected.\r\n\r\nAdd the missing reference acquisition.\r\n\r\nAbridged stack trace:\r\n\r\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000091400c0\n CPU: 15 PID: 2464 Comm: irq/53-pcie-dpc 6.9.0\n RIP: pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x17/0x50\n pci_dev_wait()\n pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus()\n dpc_reset_link()\n pcie_do_recovery()\n dpc_handler()(CVE-2024-42302)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports a issue as follows:\n============================================\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe\nPGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341\n ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451\n ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline]\n ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214\n[...]\n============================================\r\n\r\nThe immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry\nfor the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of\nbounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.\r\n\r\n do_split\n unsigned split\n dx_make_map\n count = 1\n split = count/2 = 0;\n continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;\n ---\u0026gt; map[4294967295]\r\n\r\nThe maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024,\nso it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or\nequal to 2 when do_split() is called.\r\n\r\nBut syzbot\u0026apos;s crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry\ndistribution in dirblock is as follows:\r\n\r\n bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free\n|xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............|\n0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024\r\n\r\nSo when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole\nnor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is\ncalled.\r\n\r\nIn make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the\ndirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root\nbecause they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved\nto the new leaf block. That\u0026apos;s why count is equal to 1.\r\n\r\nTherefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity\nchecks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above\nissue.(CVE-2024-42305)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer\r\n\r\n[why \u0026amp; how]\nNeed to make sure plane_state is initialized\nbefore accessing its members.\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 295d91cbc700651782a60572f83c24861607b648)(CVE-2024-42308)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlandlock: Don\u0026apos;t lose track of restrictions on cred_transfer\r\n\r\nWhen a process\u0026apos; cred struct is replaced, this _almost_ always invokes\nthe cred_prepare LSM hook; but in one special case (when\nKEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT updates the parent\u0026apos;s credentials), the\ncred_transfer LSM hook is used instead. Landlock only implements the\ncred_prepare hook, not cred_transfer, so KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT causes\nall information on Landlock restrictions to be lost.\r\n\r\nThis basically means that a process with the ability to use the fork()\nand keyctl() syscalls can get rid of all Landlock restrictions on\nitself.\r\n\r\nFix it by adding a cred_transfer hook that does the same thing as the\nexisting cred_prepare hook. (Implemented by having hook_cred_prepare()\ncall hook_cred_transfer() so that the two functions are less likely to\naccidentally diverge in the future.)(CVE-2024-42318)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs\r\n\r\nThis change rejects the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and\nKVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctls when called on a ucontrol VM.\nThis is necessary since ucontrol VMs have kvm-\u0026gt;arch.gmap set to 0 and\nwould thus result in a null pointer dereference further in.\nMemory management needs to be performed in userspace and using the\nioctls KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP and KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP.\r\n\r\nAlso improve s390 specific documentation for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION\nand KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2.\r\n\r\n[frankja@linux.ibm.com: commit message spelling fix, subject prefix fix](CVE-2024-43819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit\r\n\r\nWhen doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an\nuninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does\nnot detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will\nreturn immediately without initializing the \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; variable.\r\n\r\nBecause \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an\ninfinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.\r\n\r\nThis commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure\nin function ext4_es_find_extent_range().\r\n\r\nThanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\r\n\r\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()\r\n\r\nAn UAF can happen when /proc/cpuset is read as reported in [1].\r\n\r\nThis can be reproduced by the following methods:\n1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the\n cgroup_path_ns function.\n2.$cat /proc/\u0026lt;pid\u0026gt;/cpuset repeatly.\n3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/\n$umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ repeatly.\r\n\r\nThe race that cause this bug can be shown as below:\r\n\r\n(umount)\t\t|\t(cat /proc/\u0026lt;pid\u0026gt;/cpuset)\ncss_release\t\t|\tproc_cpuset_show\ncss_release_work_fn\t|\tcss = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id);\ncss_free_rwork_fn\t|\tcgroup_path_ns(css-\u0026gt;cgroup, ...);\ncgroup_destroy_root\t|\tmutex_lock(\u0026amp;cgroup_mutex);\nrebind_subsystems\t|\ncgroup_free_root \t|\n\t\t\t|\t// cgrp was freed, UAF\n\t\t\t|\tcgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);\r\n\r\nWhen the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp\nwill point to \u0026amp;cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will\nallocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated\n\u0026amp;cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed,\ntop_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to \u0026amp;cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases\nwhere the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1\nis cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is\nsubsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be\nfreed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never\nbe released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted.\nThis means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does\nnot guarantee that css.cgrp-\u0026gt;root will not be freed.\r\n\r\nFix this problem by using rcu_read_lock in proc_cpuset_show().\nAs cgroup_root is kfree_rcu after commit d23b5c577715\n(\u0026quot;cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe\u0026quot;),\ncss-\u0026gt;cgroup won\u0026apos;t be freed during the critical section.\nTo call cgroup_path_ns_locked, css_set_lock is needed, so it is safe to\nreplace task_get_css with task_css.\r\n\r\n[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd(CVE-2024-43853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nremoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL\r\n\r\nIn imx_rproc_addr_init() \u0026quot;nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()\u0026quot; just counts\nnumber of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in\nthe parsing loop (0 \u0026lt; a \u0026lt; nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced.\nAdjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters](CVE-2024-43860)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: usb: qmi_wwan: fix memory leak for not ip packets\r\n\r\nFree the unused skb when not ip packets arrive.(CVE-2024-43861)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Always drain health in shutdown callback\r\n\r\nThere is no point in recovery during device shutdown. if health\nwork started need to wait for it to avoid races and NULL pointer\naccess.\r\n\r\nHence, drain health WQ on shutdown callback.(CVE-2024-43866)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: handle 2x996 RU allocation in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he()\r\n\r\nCurrently NL80211_RATE_INFO_HE_RU_ALLOC_2x996 is not handled in\ncfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), leading to below warning:\r\n\r\nkernel: invalid HE MCS: bw:6, ru:6\nkernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2312 at net/wireless/util.c:1501 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he+0x22b/0x270 [cfg80211]\r\n\r\nFix it by handling 2x996 RU allocation in the same way as 160 MHz bandwidth.(CVE-2024-43879)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nexec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage\r\n\r\nWhen opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is\ndone against the file\u0026apos;s metadata at that moment, and on success, a file\npointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file\nmetadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how\nto set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the\npermissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.\r\n\r\nFor example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not\nset-id:\r\n\r\n---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nto set-id and non-executable:\r\n\r\n---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nit is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been\ndisallowed.\r\n\r\nWhile this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been\nobserved (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating\nthe setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being\nworld-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid\nbit. For example, \u0026quot;chmod o-x,u+s target\u0026quot; makes \u0026quot;target\u0026quot; executable only\nby uid \u0026quot;root\u0026quot; and gid \u0026quot;cdrom\u0026quot;, while also becoming setuid-root:\r\n\r\n-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nbecomes:\r\n\r\n-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nBut racing the chmod means users without group \u0026quot;cdrom\u0026quot; membership can\nget the permission to execute \u0026quot;target\u0026quot; just before the chmod, and when\nthe chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the\nsetuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of \u0026quot;only cdrom\ngroup members can setuid to root\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nRe-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata\nhas changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,\nbut until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a\nfull inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that\nthis is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.(CVE-2024-43882)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2078",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:33Z",
"published": "2024-08-30T11:07:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2078"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42288"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42297"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42302"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42308"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42318"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43882"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48920",
"CVE-2022-48935",
"CVE-2024-36946",
"CVE-2024-38613",
"CVE-2024-39490",
"CVE-2024-41002",
"CVE-2024-41015",
"CVE-2024-41059",
"CVE-2024-41068",
"CVE-2024-42120",
"CVE-2024-42122",
"CVE-2024-42265",
"CVE-2024-42271",
"CVE-2024-42280",
"CVE-2024-42281",
"CVE-2024-42284",
"CVE-2024-42285",
"CVE-2024-42288",
"CVE-2024-42297",
"CVE-2024-42302",
"CVE-2024-42305",
"CVE-2024-42308",
"CVE-2024-42318",
"CVE-2024-43819",
"CVE-2024-43828",
"CVE-2024-43831",
"CVE-2024-43853",
"CVE-2024-43860",
"CVE-2024-43861",
"CVE-2024-43866",
"CVE-2024-43879",
"CVE-2024-43882"
]
}
oesa-2024-2080
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: fix memleak in io_init_wq_offload()
I got memory leak report when doing fuzz test:
BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888107310a80 (size 96): comm "syz-executor.6", pid 4610, jiffies 4295140240 (age 20.135s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N.......... backtrace: [<000000001974933b>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline] [<000000001974933b>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:721 [inline] [<000000001974933b>] io_init_wq_offload fs/io_uring.c:7920 [inline] [<000000001974933b>] io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x466/0x640 fs/io_uring.c:7955 [<0000000039d0800d>] __io_uring_add_tctx_node+0x256/0x360 fs/io_uring.c:9016 [<000000008482e78c>] io_uring_add_tctx_node fs/io_uring.c:9052 [inline] [<000000008482e78c>] __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9354 [inline] [<000000008482e78c>] __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9301 [inline] [<000000008482e78c>] __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0xabc/0xc20 fs/io_uring.c:9301 [<00000000b875f18f>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<00000000b875f18f>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<000000006b0a8484>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
CPU0 CPU1 io_uring_enter io_uring_enter io_uring_add_tctx_node io_uring_add_tctx_node __io_uring_add_tctx_node __io_uring_add_tctx_node io_uring_alloc_task_context io_uring_alloc_task_context io_init_wq_offload io_init_wq_offload hash = kzalloc hash = kzalloc ctx->hash_map = hash ctx->hash_map = hash <- one of the hash is leaked
When calling io_uring_enter() in parallel, the 'hash_map' will be leaked, add uring_lock to protect 'hash_map'.(CVE-2021-47292)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: ensure task_work gets run as part of cancelations
If we successfully cancel a work item but that work item needs to be processed through task_work, then we can be sleeping uninterruptibly in io_uring_cancel_generic() and never process it. Hence we don't make forward progress and we end up with an uninterruptible sleep warning.
While in there, correct a comment that should be IFF, not IIF.(CVE-2021-47504)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ethtool: ioctl: fix potential NULL deref in ethtool_set_coalesce()
ethtool_set_coalesce() now uses both the .get_coalesce() and .set_coalesce() callbacks. But the check for their availability is buggy, so changing the coalesce settings on a device where the driver provides only one of the callbacks results in a NULL pointer dereference instead of an -EOPNOTSUPP.
Fix the condition so that the availability of both callbacks is ensured. This also matches the netlink code.
Note that reproducing this requires some effort - it only affects the legacy ioctl path, and needs a specific combination of driver options: - have .get_coalesce() and .coalesce_supported but no .set_coalesce(), or - have .set_coalesce() but no .get_coalesce(). Here eg. ethtool doesn't cause the crash as it first attempts to call ethtool_get_coalesce() and bails out on error.(CVE-2021-47556)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/gma500: Fix BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context errors
gma_crtc_page_flip() was holding the event_lock spinlock while calling crtc_funcs->mode_set_base() which takes ww_mutex.
The only reason to hold event_lock is to clear gma_crtc->page_flip_event on mode_set_base() errors.
Instead unlock it after setting gma_crtc->page_flip_event and on errors re-take the lock and clear gma_crtc->page_flip_event it it is still set.
This fixes the following WARN/stacktrace:
[ 512.122953] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:870 [ 512.123004] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1253, name: gnome-shell [ 512.123031] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 [ 512.123048] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 [ 512.123066] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 512.123080] irq event stamp: 0 [ 512.123094] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 512.123134] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff8d0ec28c>] copy_process+0x9fc/0x1de0 [ 512.123176] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8d0ec28c>] copy_process+0x9fc/0x1de0 [ 512.123207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 512.123233] Preemption disabled at: [ 512.123241] [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 512.123275] CPU: 3 PID: 1253 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G W 5.19.0+ #1 [ 512.123304] Hardware name: Packard Bell dot s/SJE01_CT, BIOS V1.10 07/23/2013 [ 512.123323] Call Trace: [ 512.123346] <TASK> [ 512.123370] dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x77 [ 512.123412] __might_resched.cold+0xff/0x13a [ 512.123458] ww_mutex_lock+0x1e/0xa0 [ 512.123495] psb_gem_pin+0x2c/0x150 [gma500_gfx] [ 512.123601] gma_pipe_set_base+0x76/0x240 [gma500_gfx] [ 512.123708] gma_crtc_page_flip+0x95/0x130 [gma500_gfx] [ 512.123808] drm_mode_page_flip_ioctl+0x57d/0x5d0 [ 512.123897] ? drm_mode_cursor2_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [ 512.123936] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa1/0x150 [ 512.123984] drm_ioctl+0x21f/0x420 [ 512.124025] ? drm_mode_cursor2_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [ 512.124070] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb/0x60 [ 512.124104] ? lock_release+0x1ef/0x2d0 [ 512.124161] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8d/0xd0 [ 512.124203] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 [ 512.124239] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 [ 512.124267] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x55/0xe0 [ 512.124300] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 [ 512.124340] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x10/0x80 [ 512.124377] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 512.124411] RIP: 0033:0x7fcc4a70740f [ 512.124442] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 18 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00 [ 512.124470] RSP: 002b:00007ffda73f5390 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 512.124503] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055cc9e474500 RCX: 00007fcc4a70740f [ 512.124524] RDX: 00007ffda73f5420 RSI: 00000000c01864b0 RDI: 0000000000000009 [ 512.124544] RBP: 00007ffda73f5420 R08: 000055cc9c0b0cb0 R09: 0000000000000034 [ 512.124564] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c01864b0 [ 512.124584] R13: 0000000000000009 R14: 000055cc9df484d0 R15: 000055cc9af5d0c0 [ 512.124647] </TASK>(CVE-2022-48634)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: sched: fix possible refcount leak in tc_new_tfilter()
tfilter_put need to be called to put the refount got by tp->ops->get to avoid possible refcount leak when chain->tmplt_ops != NULL and chain->tmplt_ops != tp->ops.(CVE-2022-48639)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: fix percpu memory leak at nf_tables_addchain()
It seems to me that percpu memory for chain stats started leaking since commit 3bc158f8d0330f0a ("netfilter: nf_tables: map basechain priority to hardware priority") when nft_chain_offload_priority() returned an error.(CVE-2022-48642)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: fix nft_counters_enabled underflow at nf_tables_addchain()
syzbot is reporting underflow of nft_counters_enabled counter at nf_tables_addchain() [1], for commit 43eb8949cfdffa76 ("netfilter: nf_tables: do not leave chain stats enabled on error") missed that nf_tables_chain_destroy() after nft_basechain_init() in the error path of nf_tables_addchain() decrements the counter because nft_basechain_init() makes nft_is_base_chain() return true by setting NFT_CHAIN_BASE flag.
Increment the counter immediately after returning from nft_basechain_init().(CVE-2022-48643)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled
In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc->destroy() gets called even if qdisc->init() never succeeded, not exclusively since commit 87b60cfacf9f ("net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation"), but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).
The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full offload, because it starts off with q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in taprio_init(), then it replaces q->flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).
But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q->flags).
But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() (a bitwise check of bit 1 in q->flags), it is invalid to call this macro on q->flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on an invalid set of flags.
As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an error between setting q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.
The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc, but instead as child of an mqprio root qdisc:
$ tc qdisc add dev swp0 root handle 1: \ mqprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 hw 0 $ tc qdisc replace dev swp0 parent 1:1 \ taprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0 \ sched-entry S 0x7f 990000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000 \ flags 0x0 clockid CLOCK_TAI Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffff8 [fffffffffffffff8] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Call trace: taprio_dump+0x27c/0x310 vsc9959_port_setup_tc+0x1f4/0x460 felix_port_setup_tc+0x24/0x3c dsa_slave_setup_tc+0x54/0x27c taprio_disable_offload.isra.0+0x58/0xe0 taprio_destroy+0x80/0x104 qdisc_create+0x240/0x470 tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6b0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x130 rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x2c
Fix this by keeping track of the operations we made, and undo the offload only if we actually did it.
I've added "bool offloaded" inside a 4 byte hole between "int clockid" and "atomic64_t picos_per_byte". Now the first cache line looks like below:
$ pahole -C taprio_sched net/sched/sch_taprio.o struct taprio_sched { struct Qdisc * * qdiscs; / 0 8 / struct Qdisc * root; / 8 8 / u32 flags; / 16 4 / enum tk_offsets tk_offset; / 20 4 / int clockid; / 24 4 / bool offloaded; / 28 1 /
/* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */
atomic64_t picos_per_byte; /* 32 0 */
/* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */
spinlock_t current_entry_lock; /* 40 0 */
/* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */
struct sched_entry * current_entry; /* 48 8 */
struct sched_gate_list * oper_sched; /* 56 8 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */(CVE-2022-48644)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sfc: fix TX channel offset when using legacy interrupts
In legacy interrupt mode the tx_channel_offset was hardcoded to 1, but that's not correct if efx_sepparate_tx_channels is false. In that case, the offset is 0 because the tx queues are in the single existing channel at index 0, together with the rx queue.
Without this fix, as soon as you try to send any traffic, it tries to get the tx queues from an uninitialized channel getting these errors: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c:540 efx_hard_start_xmit+0x12e/0x170 [sfc] [...] RIP: 0010:efx_hard_start_xmit+0x12e/0x170 [sfc] [...] Call Trace: <IRQ> dev_hard_start_xmit+0xd7/0x230 sch_direct_xmit+0x9f/0x360 __dev_queue_xmit+0x890/0xa40 [...] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020 [...] RIP: 0010:efx_hard_start_xmit+0x153/0x170 [sfc] [...] Call Trace: <IRQ> dev_hard_start_xmit+0xd7/0x230 sch_direct_xmit+0x9f/0x360 __dev_queue_xmit+0x890/0xa40 ...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sfc: fix null pointer dereference in efx_hard_start_xmit
Trying to get the channel from the tx_queue variable here is wrong because we can only be here if tx_queue is NULL, so we shouldn't dereference it. As the above comment in the code says, this is very unlikely to happen, but it's wrong anyway so let's fix it.
I hit this issue because of a different bug that caused tx_queue to be NULL. If that happens, this is the error message that we get here: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020 [...] RIP: 0010:efx_hard_start_xmit+0x153/0x170 sfc
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-private: Fix refcount leak bug in of_xudma_dev_get()
We should call of_node_put() for the reference returned by of_parse_phandle() in fail path or when it is not used anymore. Here we only need to move the of_node_put() before the check.(CVE-2022-48656)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: mockup: fix NULL pointer dereference when removing debugfs
We now remove the device's debugfs entries when unbinding the driver. This now causes a NULL-pointer dereference on module exit because the platform devices are unregistered after the global debugfs directory has been recursively removed. Fix it by unregistering the devices first.(CVE-2022-48663)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cgroup: Add missing cpus_read_lock() to cgroup_attach_task_all()
syzbot is hitting percpu_rwsem_assert_held(&cpu_hotplug_lock) warning at cpuset_attach() [1], for commit 4f7e7236435ca0ab ("cgroup: Fix threadgroup_rwsem <-> cpus_read_lock() deadlock") missed that cpuset_attach() is also called from cgroup_attach_task_all(). Add cpus_read_lock() like what cgroup_procs_write_start() does.(CVE-2022-48671)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
of: fdt: fix off-by-one error in unflatten_dt_nodes()
Commit 78c44d910d3e ("drivers/of: Fix depth when unflattening devicetree") forgot to fix up the depth check in the loop body in unflatten_dt_nodes() which makes it possible to overflow the nps[] buffer...
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static analysis tool.(CVE-2022-48672)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow
Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow by using mmput_async().
From the below call trace [1] can see that calling mmput() once we have the umem_odp->umem_mutex locked as required by ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() might trigger in the same task the exit_mmap()->__mmu_notifier_release()->mlx5_ib_invalidate_range() which may dead lock when trying to lock the same mutex.
Moving to use mmput_async() will solve the problem as the above exit_mmap() flow will be called in other task and will be executed once the lock will be available.
[1] [64843.077665] task:kworker/u133:2 state:D stack: 0 pid:80906 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [64843.077672] Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib] [64843.077719] Call Trace: [64843.077722] <TASK> [64843.077724] __schedule+0x23d/0x590 [64843.077729] schedule+0x4e/0xb0 [64843.077735] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10 [64843.077740] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x263/0x490 [64843.077747] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20 [64843.077752] mutex_lock+0x34/0x40 [64843.077758] mlx5_ib_invalidate_range+0x48/0x270 [mlx5_ib] [64843.077808] __mmu_notifier_release+0x1a4/0x200 [64843.077816] exit_mmap+0x1bc/0x200 [64843.077822] ? walk_page_range+0x9c/0x120 [64843.077828] ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50 [64843.077833] ? mutex_lock+0x13/0x40 [64843.077839] ? uprobe_clear_state+0xac/0x120 [64843.077860] mmput+0x5f/0x140 [64843.077867] ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock+0x21b/0x580 [ib_core] [64843.077931] pagefault_real_mr+0x9a/0x140 [mlx5_ib] [64843.077962] pagefault_mr+0xb4/0x550 [mlx5_ib] [64843.077992] pagefault_single_data_segment.constprop.0+0x2ac/0x560 [mlx5_ib] [64843.078022] mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x528/0x780 [mlx5_ib] [64843.078051] process_one_work+0x22b/0x3d0 [64843.078059] worker_thread+0x53/0x410 [64843.078065] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0 [64843.078073] kthread+0x12a/0x150 [64843.078079] ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 [64843.078085] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [64843.078093] </TASK>(CVE-2022-48675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-tcp: fix UAF when detecting digest errors
We should also bail from the io_work loop when we set rd_enabled to true, so we don't attempt to read data from the socket when the TCP stream is already out-of-sync or corrupted.(CVE-2022-48686)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix out-of-bounds read when setting HMAC data.
The SRv6 layer allows defining HMAC data that can later be used to sign IPv6 Segment Routing Headers. This configuration is realised via netlink through four attributes: SEG6_ATTR_HMACKEYID, SEG6_ATTR_SECRET, SEG6_ATTR_SECRETLEN and SEG6_ATTR_ALGID. Because the SECRETLEN attribute is decoupled from the actual length of the SECRET attribute, it is possible to provide invalid combinations (e.g., secret = "", secretlen = 64). This case is not checked in the code and with an appropriately crafted netlink message, an out-of-bounds read of up to 64 bytes (max secret length) can occur past the skb end pointer and into skb_shared_info:
Breakpoint 1, seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 208 memcpy(hinfo->secret, secret, slen); (gdb) bt #0 seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 #1 0xffffffff81e012e9 in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=nlh@entry=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=extack@entry=0xffffc90000ba7af0, ops=ops@entry=0xffffc90000ba7a80, hdrlen=4, net=0xffffffff84237580 <init_net>, family=<optimized out>, family=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 #2 0xffffffff81e01435 in genl_family_rcv_msg (extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, family=0xffffffff82fef6c0 <seg6_genl_family>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 #3 genl_rcv_msg (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 #4 0xffffffff81dfffc3 in netlink_rcv_skb (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, cb=cb@entry=0xffffffff81e01350 <genl_rcv_msg>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 #5 0xffffffff81e00919 in genl_rcv (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 #6 0xffffffff81dff6ae in netlink_unicast_kernel (ssk=0xffff888010eec800, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, sk=0xffff888004aed000) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 #7 netlink_unicast (ssk=ssk@entry=0xffff888010eec800, skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, portid=portid@entry=0, nonblock=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 #8 0xffffffff81dff9a4 in netlink_sendmsg (sock=<optimized out>, msg=0xffffc90000ba7e48, len=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 ... (gdb) p/x ((struct sk_buff )0xffff88800b1f9f00)->head + ((struct sk_buff )0xffff88800b1f9f00)->end $1 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p/x secret $2 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p slen $3 = 64 '@'
The OOB data can then be read back from userspace by dumping HMAC state. This commit fixes this by ensuring SECRETLEN cannot exceed the actual length of SECRET.(CVE-2022-48687)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: clean up hook list when offload flags check fails
splice back the hook list so nft_chain_release_hook() has a chance to release the hooks.
BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810180b100 (size 96): comm "syz-executor133", pid 3619, jiffies 4294945714 (age 12.690s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 28 64 23 02 81 88 ff ff 28 64 23 02 81 88 ff ff (d#.....(d#..... 90 a8 aa 83 ff ff ff ff 00 00 b5 0f 81 88 ff ff ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff83a8c59b>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline] [<ffffffff83a8c59b>] nft_netdev_hook_alloc+0x3b/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1901 [<ffffffff83a9239a>] nft_chain_parse_netdev net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1998 [inline] [<ffffffff83a9239a>] nft_chain_parse_hook+0x33a/0x530 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2073 [<ffffffff83a9b14b>] nf_tables_addchain.constprop.0+0x10b/0x950 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2218 [<ffffffff83a9c41b>] nf_tables_newchain+0xa8b/0xc60 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2593 [<ffffffff83a3d6a6>] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0xa46/0xd20 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:517 [<ffffffff83a3db79>] nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:638 [inline] [<ffffffff83a3db79>] nfnetlink_rcv+0x1f9/0x220 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:656 [<ffffffff83a13b17>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] [<ffffffff83a13b17>] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 [<ffffffff83a13fd6>] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 [<ffffffff83865ab6>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] [<ffffffff83865ab6>] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734 [<ffffffff8386601c>] _syssendmsg+0x36c/0x390 net/socket.c:2482 [<ffffffff8386a918>] _sys_sendmsg+0xa8/0x110 net/socket.c:2536 [<ffffffff8386aaa8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x88/0x100 net/socket.c:2565 [<ffffffff845e5955>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff845e5955>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd(CVE-2022-48691)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc: fastrpc: Don't remove map on creater_process and device_release
Do not remove the map from the list on error path in fastrpc_init_create_process, instead call fastrpc_map_put, to avoid use-after-free. Do not remove it on fastrpc_device_release either, call fastrpc_map_put instead.
The fastrpc_free_map is the only proper place to remove the map. This is called only after the reference count is 0.(CVE-2022-48873)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ixgbe: fix pci device refcount leak
As the comment of pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() says, it returns a PCI device with refcount incremented, when finish using it, the caller must decrement the reference count by calling pci_dev_put().
In ixgbe_get_first_secondary_devfn() and ixgbe_x550em_a_has_mii(), pci_dev_put() is called to avoid leak.(CVE-2022-48896)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dp: do not complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() if irq is not for aux transfer
There are 3 possible interrupt sources are handled by DP controller, HPDstatus, Controller state changes and Aux read/write transaction. At every irq, DP controller have to check isr status of every interrupt sources and service the interrupt if its isr status bits shows interrupts are pending. There is potential race condition may happen at current aux isr handler implementation since it is always complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() even irq is not for aux read or write transaction. This may cause aux read transaction return premature if host aux data read is in the middle of waiting for sink to complete transferring data to host while irq happen. This will cause host's receiving buffer contains unexpected data. This patch fixes this problem by checking aux isr and return immediately at aux isr handler if there are no any isr status bits set.
Current there is a bug report regrading eDP edid corruption happen during system booting up. After lengthy debugging to found that VIDEO_READY interrupt was continuously firing during system booting up which cause dp_aux_isr() to complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() prematurely to retrieve data from aux hardware buffer which is not yet contains complete data transfer from sink. This cause edid corruption.
Follows are the signature at kernel logs when problem happen, EDID has corrupt header panel-simple-dp-aux aux-aea0000.edp: Couldn't identify panel via EDID
Changes in v2: -- do complete if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED) ay dp-aux_isr() -- add more commit text
Changes in v3: -- add Stephen suggested -- dp_aux_isr() return IRQ_XXX back to caller -- dp_ctrl_isr() return IRQ_XXX back to caller
Changes in v4: -- split into two patches
Changes in v5: -- delete empty line between tags
Changes in v6: -- remove extra "that" and fixed line more than 75 char at commit text
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/516121/(CVE-2022-48898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/virtio: Fix GEM handle creation UAF
Userspace can guess the handle value and try to race GEM object creation with handle close, resulting in a use-after-free if we dereference the object after dropping the handle's reference. For that reason, dropping the handle's reference must be done after we are done dereferencing the object.(CVE-2022-48899)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():
$ cat fs/fs-writeback.c: (...) static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ... { (...) WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)); (...) } (...)
The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:
[947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186 [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3 [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...) [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50 [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000 [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488 [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460 [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0 [947.571072] Call Trace: [947.572354] <TASK> [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998 [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156 [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407 [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139 [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32 [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [947.597561] </TASK> [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---
This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made by commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning, and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.
We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem() is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.
To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it. This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered elsewhere.
An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number of delalloc bytes we currently have, in ---truncated---(CVE-2022-48920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: unregister flowtable hooks on netns exit
Unregister flowtable hooks before they are releases via nf_tables_flowtable_destroy() otherwise hook core reports UAF.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142 Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880736f7438 by task syz-executor579/3666
CPU: 0 PID: 3666 Comm: syz-executor579 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack_lvl+0x1dc/0x2d8 lib/dump_stack.c:106 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x65/0x380 mm/kasan/report.c:247 mm/kasan/report.c:247 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline] __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline] mm/kasan/report.c:450 kasan_report+0x19a/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:450 mm/kasan/report.c:450 nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142 __nf_register_net_hook+0x27e/0x8d0 net/netfilter/core.c:429 net/netfilter/core.c:429 nf_register_net_hook+0xaa/0x180 net/netfilter/core.c:571 net/netfilter/core.c:571 nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks+0x3c5/0x730 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232 nf_tables_newflowtable+0x2022/0x2cf0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430 nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline] nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline] nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 nfnetlink_rcv+0x10e6/0x2550 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652
__nft_release_hook() calls nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks() which only unregisters the hooks, then after RCU grace period, it is guaranteed that no packets add new entries to the flowtable (no flow offload rules and flowtable hooks are reachable from packet path), so it is safe to call nf_flow_table_free() which cleans up the remaining entries from the flowtable (both software and hardware) and it unbinds the flow_block.(CVE-2022-48935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gsmi: fix null-deref in gsmi_get_variable
We can get EFI variables without fetching the attribute, so we must allow for that in gsmi.
commit 859748255b43 ("efi: pstore: Omit efivars caching EFI varstore access layer") added a new get_variable call with attr=NULL, which triggers panic in gsmi.(CVE-2023-52893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xhci: Fix null pointer dereference when host dies
Make sure xhci_free_dev() and xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs() do not race and cause null pointer dereference when host suddenly dies.
Usb core may call xhci_free_dev() which frees the xhci->devs[slot_id] virt device at the same time that xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs() tries to loop through all the device's endpoints, checking if there are any cancelled urbs left to give back.
hold the xhci spinlock while freeing the virt device(CVE-2023-52898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: xhci: Check endpoint is valid before dereferencing it
When the host controller is not responding, all URBs queued to all endpoints need to be killed. This can cause a kernel panic if we dereference an invalid endpoint.
Fix this by using xhci_get_virt_ep() helper to find the endpoint and checking if the endpoint is valid before dereferencing it.
[233311.853271] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.1.auto: xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead [233311.853393] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000e8
[233311.853964] pc : xhci_hc_died+0x10c/0x270 [233311.853971] lr : xhci_hc_died+0x1ac/0x270
[233311.854077] Call trace: [233311.854085] xhci_hc_died+0x10c/0x270 [233311.854093] xhci_stop_endpoint_command_watchdog+0x100/0x1a4 [233311.854105] call_timer_fn+0x50/0x2d4 [233311.854112] expire_timers+0xac/0x2e4 [233311.854118] run_timer_softirq+0x300/0xabc [233311.854127] __do_softirq+0x148/0x528 [233311.854135] irq_exit+0x194/0x1a8 [233311.854143] __handle_domain_irq+0x164/0x1d0 [233311.854149] gic_handle_irq.22273+0x10c/0x188 [233311.854156] el1_irq+0xfc/0x1a8 [233311.854175] lpm_cpuidle_enter+0x25c/0x418 [msm_pm] [233311.854185] cpuidle_enter_state+0x1f0/0x764 [233311.854194] do_idle+0x594/0x6ac [233311.854201] cpu_startup_entry+0x7c/0x80 [233311.854209] secondary_start_kernel+0x170/0x198(CVE-2023-52901)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: lock overflowing for IOPOLL
syzbot reports an issue with overflow filling for IOPOLL:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28 at io_uring/io_uring.c:734 io_cqring_event_overflow+0x1c0/0x230 io_uring/io_uring.c:734 CPU: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-16369-g358a161a6a9e #0 Workqueue: events_unbound io_ring_exit_work Call trace: io_cqring_event_overflow+0x1c0/0x230 io_uring/io_uring.c:734 io_req_cqe_overflow+0x5c/0x70 io_uring/io_uring.c:773 io_fill_cqe_req io_uring/io_uring.h:168 [inline] io_do_iopoll+0x474/0x62c io_uring/rw.c:1065 io_iopoll_try_reap_events+0x6c/0x108 io_uring/io_uring.c:1513 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x13c/0x258 io_uring/io_uring.c:3056 io_ring_exit_work+0xec/0x390 io_uring/io_uring.c:2869 process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:863
There is no real problem for normal IOPOLL as flush is also called with uring_lock taken, but it's getting more complicated for IOPOLL|SQPOLL, for which __io_cqring_overflow_flush() happens from the CQ waiting path.(CVE-2023-52903)
A race condition was found in the Linux kernel's drm/exynos device driver in exynos_drm_crtc_atomic_disable() function. This can result in a null pointer dereference issue, possibly leading to a kernel panic or denial of service issue.
(CVE-2024-22386)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation
fill_route() stores three components in the skb:
- struct rtmsg
- RTA_DST (u8)
- RTA_OIF (u32)
Therefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use
NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) + nla_total_size(1) + nla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and 'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0. Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit 533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()") but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here - this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).(CVE-2024-38613)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core
The seg6_input() function is responsible for adding the SRH into a packet, delegating the operation to the seg6_input_core(). This function uses the skb_cow_head() to ensure that there is sufficient headroom in the sk_buff for accommodating the link-layer header. In the event that the skb_cow_header() function fails, the seg6_input_core() catches the error but it does not release the sk_buff, which will result in a memory leak.
This issue was introduced in commit af3b5158b89d ("ipv6: sr: fix BUG due to headroom too small after SRH push") and persists even after commit 7a3f5b0de364 ("netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane"), where the entire seg6_input() code was refactored to deal with netfilter hooks.
The proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by requiring the seg6_input_core() function to release the sk_buff in the event that skb_cow_head() fails.(CVE-2024-39490)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: hisilicon/sec - Fix memory leak for sec resource release
The AIV is one of the SEC resources. When releasing resources, it need to release the AIV resources at the same time. Otherwise, memory leakage occurs.
The aiv resource release is added to the sec resource release function.(CVE-2024-41002)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/sclp: Fix sclp_init() cleanup on failure
If sclp_init() fails it only partially cleans up: if there are multiple failing calls to sclp_init() sclp_state_change_event will be added several times to sclp_reg_list, which results in the following warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------ list_add double add: new=000003ffe1598c10, prev=000003ffe1598bf0, next=000003ffe1598c10. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3 Krnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 000003ffe0d6076a (__list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8) R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 ... Call Trace: [<000003ffe0d6076a>] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8 ([<000003ffe0d60766>] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8) [<000003ffe0a8d37e>] sclp_init+0x40e/0x450 [<000003ffe00009f2>] do_one_initcall+0x42/0x1e0 [<000003ffe15b77a6>] do_initcalls+0x126/0x150 [<000003ffe15b7a0a>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ba/0x1f8 [<000003ffe0d6650e>] kernel_init+0x2e/0x180 [<000003ffe000301c>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [<000003ffe0d759ca>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
Fix this by removing sclp_state_change_event from sclp_reg_list when sclp_init() fails.(CVE-2024-41068)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check pipe offset before setting vblank
pipe_ctx has a size of MAX_PIPES so checking its index before accessing the array.
This fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-42120)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer check for kzalloc
[Why & How] Check return pointer of kzalloc before using it.(CVE-2024-42122)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
protect the fetch of ->fd[fd] in do_dup2() from mispredictions
both callers have verified that fd is not greater than ->max_fds; however, misprediction might end up with tofree = fdt->fd[fd]; being speculatively executed. That's wrong for the same reasons why it's wrong in close_fd()/file_close_fd_locked(); the same solution applies - array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds) could differ from fd only in case of speculative execution on mispredicted path.(CVE-2024-42265)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()
iucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context. iucv->path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of severing the path (or it is already removed / never existed). This needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a small window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has already been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by iucv_tasklet_fn().
Example: [452744.123844] Call Trace: [452744.123845] ([<0000001e87f03880>] 0x1e87f03880) [452744.123966] [<00000000d593001e>] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138 [452744.124330] [<000003ff801ddbca>] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124336] [<000003ff801e01b6>] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv] [452744.124341] [<000003ff801e08cc>] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124345] [<00000000d574794e>] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8 [452744.124815] [<00000000d5747a0c>] sock_close+0x34/0x48 [452744.124820] [<00000000d5421642>] __fput+0xba/0x268 [452744.124826] [<00000000d51b382c>] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0 [452744.124832] [<00000000d5145710>] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90 [452744.124841] [<00000000d5978096>] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8 [452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [452744.125321] [<00000000d5930018>] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138 [452744.125324] [452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Note that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against process context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and corresponding handling is missing.
Ideas for a future clean-up patch: A) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in Re-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the tasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.
B) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()
Don't dereference sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(sp).(CVE-2024-42280)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix a segment issue when downgrading gso_size
Linearize the skb when downgrading gso_size because it may trigger a BUG_ON() later when the skb is segmented as described in [1,2].(CVE-2024-42281)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str() on error
tipc_udp_addr2str() should return non-zero value if the UDP media address is invalid. Otherwise, a buffer overflow access can occur in tipc_media_addr_printf(). Fix this by returning 1 on an invalid UDP media address.(CVE-2024-42284)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/iwcm: Fix a use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs
iw_conn_req_handler() associates a new struct rdma_id_private (conn_id) with an existing struct iw_cm_id (cm_id) as follows:
conn_id->cm_id.iw = cm_id;
cm_id->context = conn_id;
cm_id->cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;
rdma_destroy_id() frees both the cm_id and the struct rdma_id_private. Make sure that cm_work_handler() does not trigger a use-after-free by only freeing of the struct rdma_id_private after all pending work has finished.(CVE-2024-42285)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to don't dirty inode for readonly filesystem
syzbot reports f2fs bug as below:
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:933! RIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x1576/0x1590 fs/f2fs/inode.c:933 Call Trace: evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664 dispose_list fs/inode.c:697 [inline] evict_inodes+0x5f8/0x690 fs/inode.c:747 generic_shutdown_super+0x9d/0x2c0 fs/super.c:675 kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1667 kill_f2fs_super+0x303/0x3b0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4894 deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x130 fs/super.c:484 cleanup_mnt+0x426/0x4c0 fs/namespace.c:1256 task_work_run+0x24a/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 ptrace_notify+0x2cd/0x380 kernel/signal.c:2399 ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline] ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline] syscall_exit_work kernel/entry/common.c:251 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare kernel/entry/common.c:278 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x15c/0x280 kernel/entry/common.c:296 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:88 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
The root cause is: - do_sys_open - f2fs_lookup - __f2fs_find_entry - f2fs_i_depth_write - f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync - f2fs_dirty_inode - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)
- umount
- kill_f2fs_super
- kill_block_super
- generic_shutdown_super
- sync_filesystem : sb is readonly, skip sync_filesystem()
- evict_inodes
- iput
- f2fs_evict_inode
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)) : trigger kernel panic
When we try to repair i_current_depth in readonly filesystem, let's skip dirty inode to avoid panic in later f2fs_evict_inode().(CVE-2024-42297)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed
Syzbot reports a issue as follows:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe PGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0 Call Trace: <TASK> make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451 ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline] ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214 [...] ============================================
The immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry for the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of bounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.
do_split
unsigned split
dx_make_map
count = 1
split = count/2 = 0;
continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;
---> map[4294967295]
The maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024, so it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or equal to 2 when do_split() is called.
But syzbot's crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry distribution in dirblock is as follows:
bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free |xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............| 0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024
So when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole nor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is called.
In make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the dirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root because they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved to the new leaf block. That's why count is equal to 1.
Therefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity checks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above issue.(CVE-2024-42305)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer
[why & how] Need to make sure plane_state is initialized before accessing its members.
(cherry picked from commit 295d91cbc700651782a60572f83c24861607b648)(CVE-2024-42308)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs
This change rejects the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctls when called on a ucontrol VM. This is necessary since ucontrol VMs have kvm->arch.gmap set to 0 and would thus result in a null pointer dereference further in. Memory management needs to be performed in userspace and using the ioctls KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP and KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP.
Also improve s390 specific documentation for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2.
frankja@linux.ibm.com: commit message spelling fix, subject prefix fix
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit
When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable.
Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.
This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range().
Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi
Handle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi is valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()
An UAF can happen when /proc/cpuset is read as reported in [1].
This can be reproduced by the following methods: 1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the cgroup_path_ns function. 2.$cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset repeatly. 3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ $umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ repeatly.
The race that cause this bug can be shown as below:
(umount) | (cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset) css_release | proc_cpuset_show css_release_work_fn | css = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id); css_free_rwork_fn | cgroup_path_ns(css->cgroup, ...); cgroup_destroy_root | mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex); rebind_subsystems | cgroup_free_root | | // cgrp was freed, UAF | cgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);
When the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will allocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated &cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed, top_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.
The problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases where the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1 is cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is subsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be freed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never be released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted. This means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does not guarantee that css.cgrp->root will not be freed.
Fix this problem by using rcu_read_lock in proc_cpuset_show(). As cgroup_root is kfree_rcu after commit d23b5c577715 ("cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe"), css->cgroup won't be freed during the critical section. To call cgroup_path_ns_locked, css_set_lock is needed, so it is safe to replace task_get_css with task_css.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd(CVE-2024-43853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL
In imx_rproc_addr_init() "nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()" just counts number of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in the parsing loop (0 < a < nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Adjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: usb: qmi_wwan: fix memory leak for not ip packets
Free the unused skb when not ip packets arrive.(CVE-2024-43861)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Always drain health in shutdown callback
There is no point in recovery during device shutdown. if health work started need to wait for it to avoid races and NULL pointer access.
Hence, drain health WQ on shutdown callback.(CVE-2024-43866)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: handle 2x996 RU allocation in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he()
Currently NL80211_RATE_INFO_HE_RU_ALLOC_2x996 is not handled in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), leading to below warning:
kernel: invalid HE MCS: bw:6, ru:6 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2312 at net/wireless/util.c:1501 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he+0x22b/0x270 [cfg80211]
Fix it by handling 2x996 RU allocation in the same way as 160 MHz bandwidth.(CVE-2024-43879)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage
When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.
For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not set-id:
---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
to set-id and non-executable:
---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been disallowed.
While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
becomes:
-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target
But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom group members can setuid to root".
Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time, but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.(CVE-2024-43882)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.91.0.172.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring: fix memleak in io_init_wq_offload()\r\n\r\nI got memory leak report when doing fuzz test:\r\n\r\nBUG: memory leak\nunreferenced object 0xffff888107310a80 (size 96):\ncomm \u0026quot;syz-executor.6\u0026quot;, pid 4610, jiffies 4295140240 (age 20.135s)\nhex dump (first 32 bytes):\n01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 .....N..........\nbacktrace:\n[\u0026lt;000000001974933b\u0026gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;000000001974933b\u0026gt;] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:721 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;000000001974933b\u0026gt;] io_init_wq_offload fs/io_uring.c:7920 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;000000001974933b\u0026gt;] io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x466/0x640 fs/io_uring.c:7955\n[\u0026lt;0000000039d0800d\u0026gt;] __io_uring_add_tctx_node+0x256/0x360 fs/io_uring.c:9016\n[\u0026lt;000000008482e78c\u0026gt;] io_uring_add_tctx_node fs/io_uring.c:9052 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;000000008482e78c\u0026gt;] __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9354 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;000000008482e78c\u0026gt;] __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9301 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;000000008482e78c\u0026gt;] __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0xabc/0xc20 fs/io_uring.c:9301\n[\u0026lt;00000000b875f18f\u0026gt;] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n[\u0026lt;00000000b875f18f\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n[\u0026lt;000000006b0a8484\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\nio_uring_enter io_uring_enter\nio_uring_add_tctx_node io_uring_add_tctx_node\n__io_uring_add_tctx_node __io_uring_add_tctx_node\nio_uring_alloc_task_context io_uring_alloc_task_context\nio_init_wq_offload io_init_wq_offload\nhash = kzalloc hash = kzalloc\nctx-\u0026gt;hash_map = hash ctx-\u0026gt;hash_map = hash \u0026lt;- one of the hash is leaked\r\n\r\nWhen calling io_uring_enter() in parallel, the \u0026apos;hash_map\u0026apos; will be leaked,\nadd uring_lock to protect \u0026apos;hash_map\u0026apos;.(CVE-2021-47292)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring: ensure task_work gets run as part of cancelations\r\n\r\nIf we successfully cancel a work item but that work item needs to be\nprocessed through task_work, then we can be sleeping uninterruptibly\nin io_uring_cancel_generic() and never process it. Hence we don\u0026apos;t\nmake forward progress and we end up with an uninterruptible sleep\nwarning.\r\n\r\nWhile in there, correct a comment that should be IFF, not IIF.(CVE-2021-47504)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nethtool: ioctl: fix potential NULL deref in ethtool_set_coalesce()\r\n\r\nethtool_set_coalesce() now uses both the .get_coalesce() and\n.set_coalesce() callbacks. But the check for their availability is\nbuggy, so changing the coalesce settings on a device where the driver\nprovides only _one_ of the callbacks results in a NULL pointer\ndereference instead of an -EOPNOTSUPP.\r\n\r\nFix the condition so that the availability of both callbacks is\nensured. This also matches the netlink code.\r\n\r\nNote that reproducing this requires some effort - it only affects the\nlegacy ioctl path, and needs a specific combination of driver options:\n- have .get_coalesce() and .coalesce_supported but no\n .set_coalesce(), or\n- have .set_coalesce() but no .get_coalesce(). Here eg. ethtool doesn\u0026apos;t\n cause the crash as it first attempts to call ethtool_get_coalesce()\n and bails out on error.(CVE-2021-47556)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/gma500: Fix BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context errors\r\n\r\ngma_crtc_page_flip() was holding the event_lock spinlock while calling\ncrtc_funcs-\u0026gt;mode_set_base() which takes ww_mutex.\r\n\r\nThe only reason to hold event_lock is to clear gma_crtc-\u0026gt;page_flip_event\non mode_set_base() errors.\r\n\r\nInstead unlock it after setting gma_crtc-\u0026gt;page_flip_event and on\nerrors re-take the lock and clear gma_crtc-\u0026gt;page_flip_event it\nit is still set.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the following WARN/stacktrace:\r\n\r\n[ 512.122953] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:870\n[ 512.123004] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1253, name: gnome-shell\n[ 512.123031] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0\n[ 512.123048] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0\n[ 512.123066] INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n[ 512.123080] irq event stamp: 0\n[ 512.123094] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 512.123134] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [\u0026lt;ffffffff8d0ec28c\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x9fc/0x1de0\n[ 512.123176] softirqs last enabled at (0): [\u0026lt;ffffffff8d0ec28c\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x9fc/0x1de0\n[ 512.123207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 512.123233] Preemption disabled at:\n[ 512.123241] [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 512.123275] CPU: 3 PID: 1253 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G W 5.19.0+ #1\n[ 512.123304] Hardware name: Packard Bell dot s/SJE01_CT, BIOS V1.10 07/23/2013\n[ 512.123323] Call Trace:\n[ 512.123346] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 512.123370] dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x77\n[ 512.123412] __might_resched.cold+0xff/0x13a\n[ 512.123458] ww_mutex_lock+0x1e/0xa0\n[ 512.123495] psb_gem_pin+0x2c/0x150 [gma500_gfx]\n[ 512.123601] gma_pipe_set_base+0x76/0x240 [gma500_gfx]\n[ 512.123708] gma_crtc_page_flip+0x95/0x130 [gma500_gfx]\n[ 512.123808] drm_mode_page_flip_ioctl+0x57d/0x5d0\n[ 512.123897] ? drm_mode_cursor2_ioctl+0x10/0x10\n[ 512.123936] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa1/0x150\n[ 512.123984] drm_ioctl+0x21f/0x420\n[ 512.124025] ? drm_mode_cursor2_ioctl+0x10/0x10\n[ 512.124070] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb/0x60\n[ 512.124104] ? lock_release+0x1ef/0x2d0\n[ 512.124161] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8d/0xd0\n[ 512.124203] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80\n[ 512.124239] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80\n[ 512.124267] ? trace_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x55/0xe0\n[ 512.124300] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80\n[ 512.124340] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x10/0x80\n[ 512.124377] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n[ 512.124411] RIP: 0033:0x7fcc4a70740f\n[ 512.124442] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;89\u0026gt; c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 18 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00\n[ 512.124470] RSP: 002b:00007ffda73f5390 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010\n[ 512.124503] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055cc9e474500 RCX: 00007fcc4a70740f\n[ 512.124524] RDX: 00007ffda73f5420 RSI: 00000000c01864b0 RDI: 0000000000000009\n[ 512.124544] RBP: 00007ffda73f5420 R08: 000055cc9c0b0cb0 R09: 0000000000000034\n[ 512.124564] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c01864b0\n[ 512.124584] R13: 0000000000000009 R14: 000055cc9df484d0 R15: 000055cc9af5d0c0\n[ 512.124647] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2022-48634)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: sched: fix possible refcount leak in tc_new_tfilter()\r\n\r\ntfilter_put need to be called to put the refount got by tp-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;get to\navoid possible refcount leak when chain-\u0026gt;tmplt_ops != NULL and\nchain-\u0026gt;tmplt_ops != tp-\u0026gt;ops.(CVE-2022-48639)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: fix percpu memory leak at nf_tables_addchain()\r\n\r\nIt seems to me that percpu memory for chain stats started leaking since\ncommit 3bc158f8d0330f0a (\u0026quot;netfilter: nf_tables: map basechain priority to\nhardware priority\u0026quot;) when nft_chain_offload_priority() returned an error.(CVE-2022-48642)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: fix nft_counters_enabled underflow at nf_tables_addchain()\r\n\r\nsyzbot is reporting underflow of nft_counters_enabled counter at\nnf_tables_addchain() [1], for commit 43eb8949cfdffa76 (\u0026quot;netfilter:\nnf_tables: do not leave chain stats enabled on error\u0026quot;) missed that\nnf_tables_chain_destroy() after nft_basechain_init() in the error path of\nnf_tables_addchain() decrements the counter because nft_basechain_init()\nmakes nft_is_base_chain() return true by setting NFT_CHAIN_BASE flag.\r\n\r\nIncrement the counter immediately after returning from\nnft_basechain_init().(CVE-2022-48643)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled\r\n\r\nIn an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc-\u0026gt;destroy() gets\ncalled even if qdisc-\u0026gt;init() never succeeded, not exclusively since\ncommit 87b60cfacf9f (\u0026quot;net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation\u0026quot;),\nbut apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).\r\n\r\nThe taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full\noffload, because it starts off with q-\u0026gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in\ntaprio_init(), then it replaces q-\u0026gt;flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS\nparsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).\r\n\r\nBut in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this\ndetermines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q-\u0026gt;flags).\r\n\r\nBut looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED()\n(a bitwise check of bit 1 in q-\u0026gt;flags), it is invalid to call this macro\non q-\u0026gt;flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set\nto U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on\nan invalid set of flags.\r\n\r\nAs a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an\nerror between setting q-\u0026gt;flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling\nof taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the\noffload to be disabled when it was never enabled.\r\n\r\nThe error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc,\nbut instead as child of an mqprio root qdisc:\r\n\r\n$ tc qdisc add dev swp0 root handle 1: \\\n\tmqprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \\\n\tqueues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 hw 0\n$ tc qdisc replace dev swp0 parent 1:1 \\\n\ttaprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \\\n\tqueues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0 \\\n\tsched-entry S 0x7f 990000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000 \\\n\tflags 0x0 clockid CLOCK_TAI\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffff8\n[fffffffffffffff8] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000\nInternal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\nCall trace:\n taprio_dump+0x27c/0x310\n vsc9959_port_setup_tc+0x1f4/0x460\n felix_port_setup_tc+0x24/0x3c\n dsa_slave_setup_tc+0x54/0x27c\n taprio_disable_offload.isra.0+0x58/0xe0\n taprio_destroy+0x80/0x104\n qdisc_create+0x240/0x470\n tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6b0\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x130\n rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x2c\r\n\r\nFix this by keeping track of the operations we made, and undo the\noffload only if we actually did it.\r\n\r\nI\u0026apos;ve added \u0026quot;bool offloaded\u0026quot; inside a 4 byte hole between \u0026quot;int clockid\u0026quot;\nand \u0026quot;atomic64_t picos_per_byte\u0026quot;. Now the first cache line looks like\nbelow:\r\n\r\n$ pahole -C taprio_sched net/sched/sch_taprio.o\nstruct taprio_sched {\n struct Qdisc * * qdiscs; /* 0 8 */\n struct Qdisc * root; /* 8 8 */\n u32 flags; /* 16 4 */\n enum tk_offsets tk_offset; /* 20 4 */\n int clockid; /* 24 4 */\n bool offloaded; /* 28 1 */\r\n\r\n /* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */\r\n\r\n atomic64_t picos_per_byte; /* 32 0 */\r\n\r\n /* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */\r\n\r\n spinlock_t current_entry_lock; /* 40 0 */\r\n\r\n /* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */\r\n\r\n struct sched_entry * current_entry; /* 48 8 */\n struct sched_gate_list * oper_sched; /* 56 8 */\n /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */(CVE-2022-48644)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsfc: fix TX channel offset when using legacy interrupts\r\n\r\nIn legacy interrupt mode the tx_channel_offset was hardcoded to 1, but\nthat\u0026apos;s not correct if efx_sepparate_tx_channels is false. In that case,\nthe offset is 0 because the tx queues are in the single existing channel\nat index 0, together with the rx queue.\r\n\r\nWithout this fix, as soon as you try to send any traffic, it tries to\nget the tx queues from an uninitialized channel getting these errors:\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c:540 efx_hard_start_xmit+0x12e/0x170 [sfc]\n [...]\n RIP: 0010:efx_hard_start_xmit+0x12e/0x170 [sfc]\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0xd7/0x230\n sch_direct_xmit+0x9f/0x360\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x890/0xa40\n [...]\n BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020\n [...]\n RIP: 0010:efx_hard_start_xmit+0x153/0x170 [sfc]\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0xd7/0x230\n sch_direct_xmit+0x9f/0x360\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x890/0xa40\n [...](CVE-2022-48647)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsfc: fix null pointer dereference in efx_hard_start_xmit\r\n\r\nTrying to get the channel from the tx_queue variable here is wrong\nbecause we can only be here if tx_queue is NULL, so we shouldn\u0026apos;t\ndereference it. As the above comment in the code says, this is very\nunlikely to happen, but it\u0026apos;s wrong anyway so let\u0026apos;s fix it.\r\n\r\nI hit this issue because of a different bug that caused tx_queue to be\nNULL. If that happens, this is the error message that we get here:\n BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020\n [...]\n RIP: 0010:efx_hard_start_xmit+0x153/0x170 [sfc](CVE-2022-48648)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: ti: k3-udma-private: Fix refcount leak bug in of_xudma_dev_get()\r\n\r\nWe should call of_node_put() for the reference returned by\nof_parse_phandle() in fail path or when it is not used anymore.\nHere we only need to move the of_node_put() before the check.(CVE-2022-48656)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: mockup: fix NULL pointer dereference when removing debugfs\r\n\r\nWe now remove the device\u0026apos;s debugfs entries when unbinding the driver.\nThis now causes a NULL-pointer dereference on module exit because the\nplatform devices are unregistered *after* the global debugfs directory\nhas been recursively removed. Fix it by unregistering the devices first.(CVE-2022-48663)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncgroup: Add missing cpus_read_lock() to cgroup_attach_task_all()\r\n\r\nsyzbot is hitting percpu_rwsem_assert_held(\u0026amp;cpu_hotplug_lock) warning at\ncpuset_attach() [1], for commit 4f7e7236435ca0ab (\u0026quot;cgroup: Fix\nthreadgroup_rwsem \u0026lt;-\u0026gt; cpus_read_lock() deadlock\u0026quot;) missed that\ncpuset_attach() is also called from cgroup_attach_task_all().\nAdd cpus_read_lock() like what cgroup_procs_write_start() does.(CVE-2022-48671)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nof: fdt: fix off-by-one error in unflatten_dt_nodes()\r\n\r\nCommit 78c44d910d3e (\u0026quot;drivers/of: Fix depth when unflattening devicetree\u0026quot;)\nforgot to fix up the depth check in the loop body in unflatten_dt_nodes()\nwhich makes it possible to overflow the nps[] buffer...\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static\nanalysis tool.(CVE-2022-48672)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow\r\n\r\nFix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow by using mmput_async().\r\n\r\nFrom the below call trace [1] can see that calling mmput() once we have\nthe umem_odp-\u0026gt;umem_mutex locked as required by\nib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() might trigger in the same task the\nexit_mmap()-\u0026gt;__mmu_notifier_release()-\u0026gt;mlx5_ib_invalidate_range() which\nmay dead lock when trying to lock the same mutex.\r\n\r\nMoving to use mmput_async() will solve the problem as the above\nexit_mmap() flow will be called in other task and will be executed once\nthe lock will be available.\r\n\r\n[1]\n[64843.077665] task:kworker/u133:2 state:D stack: 0 pid:80906 ppid:\n2 flags:0x00004000\n[64843.077672] Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077719] Call Trace:\n[64843.077722] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[64843.077724] __schedule+0x23d/0x590\n[64843.077729] schedule+0x4e/0xb0\n[64843.077735] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10\n[64843.077740] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x263/0x490\n[64843.077747] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20\n[64843.077752] mutex_lock+0x34/0x40\n[64843.077758] mlx5_ib_invalidate_range+0x48/0x270 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077808] __mmu_notifier_release+0x1a4/0x200\n[64843.077816] exit_mmap+0x1bc/0x200\n[64843.077822] ? walk_page_range+0x9c/0x120\n[64843.077828] ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50\n[64843.077833] ? mutex_lock+0x13/0x40\n[64843.077839] ? uprobe_clear_state+0xac/0x120\n[64843.077860] mmput+0x5f/0x140\n[64843.077867] ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock+0x21b/0x580 [ib_core]\n[64843.077931] pagefault_real_mr+0x9a/0x140 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077962] pagefault_mr+0xb4/0x550 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077992] pagefault_single_data_segment.constprop.0+0x2ac/0x560\n[mlx5_ib]\n[64843.078022] mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x528/0x780 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.078051] process_one_work+0x22b/0x3d0\n[64843.078059] worker_thread+0x53/0x410\n[64843.078065] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0\n[64843.078073] kthread+0x12a/0x150\n[64843.078079] ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n[64843.078085] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n[64843.078093] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2022-48675)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvme-tcp: fix UAF when detecting digest errors\r\n\r\nWe should also bail from the io_work loop when we set rd_enabled to true,\nso we don\u0026apos;t attempt to read data from the socket when the TCP stream is\nalready out-of-sync or corrupted.(CVE-2022-48686)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix out-of-bounds read when setting HMAC data.\r\n\r\nThe SRv6 layer allows defining HMAC data that can later be used to sign IPv6\nSegment Routing Headers. This configuration is realised via netlink through\nfour attributes: SEG6_ATTR_HMACKEYID, SEG6_ATTR_SECRET, SEG6_ATTR_SECRETLEN and\nSEG6_ATTR_ALGID. Because the SECRETLEN attribute is decoupled from the actual\nlength of the SECRET attribute, it is possible to provide invalid combinations\n(e.g., secret = \u0026quot;\u0026quot;, secretlen = 64). This case is not checked in the code and\nwith an appropriately crafted netlink message, an out-of-bounds read of up\nto 64 bytes (max secret length) can occur past the skb end pointer and into\nskb_shared_info:\r\n\r\nBreakpoint 1, seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;, info=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208\n208\t\tmemcpy(hinfo-\u0026gt;secret, secret, slen);\n(gdb) bt\n #0 seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;, info=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208\n #1 0xffffffff81e012e9 in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=nlh@entry=0xffff88800b1b7600,\n extack=extack@entry=0xffffc90000ba7af0, ops=ops@entry=0xffffc90000ba7a80, hdrlen=4, net=0xffffffff84237580 \u0026lt;init_net\u0026gt;, family=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;,\n family=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:731\n #2 0xffffffff81e01435 in genl_family_rcv_msg (extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00,\n family=0xffffffff82fef6c0 \u0026lt;seg6_genl_family\u0026gt;) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:775\n #3 genl_rcv_msg (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:792\n #4 0xffffffff81dfffc3 in netlink_rcv_skb (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, cb=cb@entry=0xffffffff81e01350 \u0026lt;genl_rcv_msg\u0026gt;)\n at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501\n #5 0xffffffff81e00919 in genl_rcv (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:803\n #6 0xffffffff81dff6ae in netlink_unicast_kernel (ssk=0xffff888010eec800, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, sk=0xffff888004aed000)\n at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319\n #7 netlink_unicast (ssk=ssk@entry=0xffff888010eec800, skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, portid=portid@entry=0, nonblock=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;)\n at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345\n #8 0xffffffff81dff9a4 in netlink_sendmsg (sock=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;, msg=0xffffc90000ba7e48, len=\u0026lt;optimized out\u0026gt;) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921\n...\n(gdb) p/x ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)-\u0026gt;head + ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)-\u0026gt;end\n$1 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0\n(gdb) p/x secret\n$2 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0\n(gdb) p slen\n$3 = 64 \u0026apos;@\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nThe OOB data can then be read back from userspace by dumping HMAC state. This\ncommit fixes this by ensuring SECRETLEN cannot exceed the actual length of\nSECRET.(CVE-2022-48687)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: clean up hook list when offload flags check fails\r\n\r\nsplice back the hook list so nft_chain_release_hook() has a chance to\nrelease the hooks.\r\n\r\nBUG: memory leak\nunreferenced object 0xffff88810180b100 (size 96):\n comm \u0026quot;syz-executor133\u0026quot;, pid 3619, jiffies 4294945714 (age 12.690s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 28 64 23 02 81 88 ff ff 28 64 23 02 81 88 ff ff (d#.....(d#.....\n 90 a8 aa 83 ff ff ff ff 00 00 b5 0f 81 88 ff ff ................\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a8c59b\u0026gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a8c59b\u0026gt;] nft_netdev_hook_alloc+0x3b/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1901\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a9239a\u0026gt;] nft_chain_parse_netdev net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1998 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a9239a\u0026gt;] nft_chain_parse_hook+0x33a/0x530 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2073\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a9b14b\u0026gt;] nf_tables_addchain.constprop.0+0x10b/0x950 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2218\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a9c41b\u0026gt;] nf_tables_newchain+0xa8b/0xc60 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2593\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a3d6a6\u0026gt;] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0xa46/0xd20 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:517\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a3db79\u0026gt;] nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:638 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a3db79\u0026gt;] nfnetlink_rcv+0x1f9/0x220 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:656\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a13b17\u0026gt;] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a13b17\u0026gt;] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83a13fd6\u0026gt;] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83865ab6\u0026gt;] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff83865ab6\u0026gt;] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8386601c\u0026gt;] ____sys_sendmsg+0x36c/0x390 net/socket.c:2482\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8386a918\u0026gt;] ___sys_sendmsg+0xa8/0x110 net/socket.c:2536\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8386aaa8\u0026gt;] __sys_sendmsg+0x88/0x100 net/socket.c:2565\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff845e5955\u0026gt;] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff845e5955\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff84800087\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd(CVE-2022-48691)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmisc: fastrpc: Don\u0026apos;t remove map on creater_process and device_release\r\n\r\nDo not remove the map from the list on error path in\nfastrpc_init_create_process, instead call fastrpc_map_put, to avoid\nuse-after-free. Do not remove it on fastrpc_device_release either,\ncall fastrpc_map_put instead.\r\n\r\nThe fastrpc_free_map is the only proper place to remove the map.\nThis is called only after the reference count is 0.(CVE-2022-48873)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nixgbe: fix pci device refcount leak\r\n\r\nAs the comment of pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() says, it\nreturns a PCI device with refcount incremented, when finish\nusing it, the caller must decrement the reference count by\ncalling pci_dev_put().\r\n\r\nIn ixgbe_get_first_secondary_devfn() and ixgbe_x550em_a_has_mii(),\npci_dev_put() is called to avoid leak.(CVE-2022-48896)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/msm/dp: do not complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() if irq is not for aux transfer\r\n\r\nThere are 3 possible interrupt sources are handled by DP controller,\nHPDstatus, Controller state changes and Aux read/write transaction.\nAt every irq, DP controller have to check isr status of every interrupt\nsources and service the interrupt if its isr status bits shows interrupts\nare pending. There is potential race condition may happen at current aux\nisr handler implementation since it is always complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx()\neven irq is not for aux read or write transaction. This may cause aux read\ntransaction return premature if host aux data read is in the middle of\nwaiting for sink to complete transferring data to host while irq happen.\nThis will cause host\u0026apos;s receiving buffer contains unexpected data. This\npatch fixes this problem by checking aux isr and return immediately at\naux isr handler if there are no any isr status bits set.\r\n\r\nCurrent there is a bug report regrading eDP edid corruption happen during\nsystem booting up. After lengthy debugging to found that VIDEO_READY\ninterrupt was continuously firing during system booting up which cause\ndp_aux_isr() to complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() prematurely to retrieve data\nfrom aux hardware buffer which is not yet contains complete data transfer\nfrom sink. This cause edid corruption.\r\n\r\nFollows are the signature at kernel logs when problem happen,\nEDID has corrupt header\npanel-simple-dp-aux aux-aea0000.edp: Couldn\u0026apos;t identify panel via EDID\r\n\r\nChanges in v2:\n-- do complete if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED) ay dp-aux_isr()\n-- add more commit text\r\n\r\nChanges in v3:\n-- add Stephen suggested\n-- dp_aux_isr() return IRQ_XXX back to caller\n-- dp_ctrl_isr() return IRQ_XXX back to caller\r\n\r\nChanges in v4:\n-- split into two patches\r\n\r\nChanges in v5:\n-- delete empty line between tags\r\n\r\nChanges in v6:\n-- remove extra \u0026quot;that\u0026quot; and fixed line more than 75 char at commit text\r\n\r\nPatchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/516121/(CVE-2022-48898)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/virtio: Fix GEM handle creation UAF\r\n\r\nUserspace can guess the handle value and try to race GEM object creation\nwith handle close, resulting in a use-after-free if we dereference the\nobject after dropping the handle\u0026apos;s reference. For that reason, dropping\nthe handle\u0026apos;s reference must be done *after* we are done dereferencing\nthe object.(CVE-2022-48899)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit\r\n\r\nWhen using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction\ncommit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():\r\n\r\n $ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:\n (...)\n static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...\n {\n (...)\n WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(\u0026amp;sb-\u0026gt;s_umount));\n (...)\n }\n (...)\r\n\r\nThe trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:\r\n\r\n [947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3\n [947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif\n [947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186\n [947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3\n [947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)\n [947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246\n [947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000\n [947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50\n [947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000\n [947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488\n [947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460\n [947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0\n [947.571072] Call Trace:\n [947.572354] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998\n [947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e\n [947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd\n [947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156\n [947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407\n [947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139\n [947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32\n [947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n [947.597561] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n [947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---\r\n\r\nThis is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc\nwhen committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to\navoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made\nby commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 (\u0026quot;btrfs: don\u0026apos;t call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots\nin flushoncommit\u0026quot;). After that change we started producing that warning,\nand every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too\noften, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any\nproblem that might compromise the filesystem\u0026apos;s reliability.\r\n\r\nWe can not just lock the sb-\u0026gt;s_umount semaphore before calling\nwriteback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with\nfilesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()\nis called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can\ntrigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also\ntrigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could\nalso introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.\r\n\r\nTo fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of\nwriteback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb-\u0026gt;s_umount\nand then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.\nThis is fine because the cases where it can\u0026apos;t read lock sb-\u0026gt;s_umount\nare during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those\ncases sb-\u0026gt;s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which\ncalls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can\u0026apos;t\ntake a read lock on sb-\u0026gt;s_umount, writeback is already being triggered\nelsewhere.\r\n\r\nAn alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a\nnumber of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number\nof delalloc bytes we currently have, in \n---truncated---(CVE-2022-48920)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: unregister flowtable hooks on netns exit\r\n\r\nUnregister flowtable hooks before they are releases via\nnf_tables_flowtable_destroy() otherwise hook core reports UAF.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff8880736f7438 by task syz-executor579/3666\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 3666 Comm: syz-executor579 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] lib/dump_stack.c:106\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1dc/0x2d8 lib/dump_stack.c:106 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description+0x65/0x380 mm/kasan/report.c:247 mm/kasan/report.c:247\n __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline]\n __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:433 [inline] mm/kasan/report.c:450\n kasan_report+0x19a/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:450 mm/kasan/report.c:450\n nf_hook_entries_grow+0x5a7/0x700 net/netfilter/core.c:142 net/netfilter/core.c:142\n __nf_register_net_hook+0x27e/0x8d0 net/netfilter/core.c:429 net/netfilter/core.c:429\n nf_register_net_hook+0xaa/0x180 net/netfilter/core.c:571 net/netfilter/core.c:571\n nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks+0x3c5/0x730 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7232\n nf_tables_newflowtable+0x2022/0x2cf0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7430\n nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline]\n nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline]\n nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652\n nfnetlink_rcv_skb_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:634 [inline] net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652\n nfnetlink_rcv+0x10e6/0x2550 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:652\r\n\r\n__nft_release_hook() calls nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks() which\nonly unregisters the hooks, then after RCU grace period, it is\nguaranteed that no packets add new entries to the flowtable (no flow\noffload rules and flowtable hooks are reachable from packet path), so it\nis safe to call nf_flow_table_free() which cleans up the remaining\nentries from the flowtable (both software and hardware) and it unbinds\nthe flow_block.(CVE-2022-48935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngsmi: fix null-deref in gsmi_get_variable\r\n\r\nWe can get EFI variables without fetching the attribute, so we must\nallow for that in gsmi.\r\n\r\ncommit 859748255b43 (\u0026quot;efi: pstore: Omit efivars caching EFI varstore\naccess layer\u0026quot;) added a new get_variable call with attr=NULL, which\ntriggers panic in gsmi.(CVE-2023-52893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxhci: Fix null pointer dereference when host dies\r\n\r\nMake sure xhci_free_dev() and xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs() do not race\nand cause null pointer dereference when host suddenly dies.\r\n\r\nUsb core may call xhci_free_dev() which frees the xhci-\u0026gt;devs[slot_id]\nvirt device at the same time that xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs() tries to\nloop through all the device\u0026apos;s endpoints, checking if there are any\ncancelled urbs left to give back.\r\n\r\nhold the xhci spinlock while freeing the virt device(CVE-2023-52898)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: xhci: Check endpoint is valid before dereferencing it\r\n\r\nWhen the host controller is not responding, all URBs queued to all\nendpoints need to be killed. This can cause a kernel panic if we\ndereference an invalid endpoint.\r\n\r\nFix this by using xhci_get_virt_ep() helper to find the endpoint and\nchecking if the endpoint is valid before dereferencing it.\r\n\r\n[233311.853271] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.1.auto: xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead\n[233311.853393] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000e8\r\n\r\n[233311.853964] pc : xhci_hc_died+0x10c/0x270\n[233311.853971] lr : xhci_hc_died+0x1ac/0x270\r\n\r\n[233311.854077] Call trace:\n[233311.854085] xhci_hc_died+0x10c/0x270\n[233311.854093] xhci_stop_endpoint_command_watchdog+0x100/0x1a4\n[233311.854105] call_timer_fn+0x50/0x2d4\n[233311.854112] expire_timers+0xac/0x2e4\n[233311.854118] run_timer_softirq+0x300/0xabc\n[233311.854127] __do_softirq+0x148/0x528\n[233311.854135] irq_exit+0x194/0x1a8\n[233311.854143] __handle_domain_irq+0x164/0x1d0\n[233311.854149] gic_handle_irq.22273+0x10c/0x188\n[233311.854156] el1_irq+0xfc/0x1a8\n[233311.854175] lpm_cpuidle_enter+0x25c/0x418 [msm_pm]\n[233311.854185] cpuidle_enter_state+0x1f0/0x764\n[233311.854194] do_idle+0x594/0x6ac\n[233311.854201] cpu_startup_entry+0x7c/0x80\n[233311.854209] secondary_start_kernel+0x170/0x198(CVE-2023-52901)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring: lock overflowing for IOPOLL\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports an issue with overflow filling for IOPOLL:\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28 at io_uring/io_uring.c:734 io_cqring_event_overflow+0x1c0/0x230 io_uring/io_uring.c:734\nCPU: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-16369-g358a161a6a9e #0\nWorkqueue: events_unbound io_ring_exit_work\nCall trace:\n\u00a0io_cqring_event_overflow+0x1c0/0x230 io_uring/io_uring.c:734\n\u00a0io_req_cqe_overflow+0x5c/0x70 io_uring/io_uring.c:773\n\u00a0io_fill_cqe_req io_uring/io_uring.h:168 [inline]\n\u00a0io_do_iopoll+0x474/0x62c io_uring/rw.c:1065\n\u00a0io_iopoll_try_reap_events+0x6c/0x108 io_uring/io_uring.c:1513\n\u00a0io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x13c/0x258 io_uring/io_uring.c:3056\n\u00a0io_ring_exit_work+0xec/0x390 io_uring/io_uring.c:2869\n\u00a0process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289\n\u00a0worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436\n\u00a0kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376\n\u00a0ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:863\r\n\r\nThere is no real problem for normal IOPOLL as flush is also called with\nuring_lock taken, but it\u0026apos;s getting more complicated for IOPOLL|SQPOLL,\nfor which __io_cqring_overflow_flush() happens from the CQ waiting path.(CVE-2023-52903)\r\n\r\nA race condition was found in the Linux kernel\u0026apos;s drm/exynos device driver in\u00a0exynos_drm_crtc_atomic_disable() function. This can result in a null pointer dereference issue, possibly leading to a kernel panic or denial of service issue.\r\n\r\n\n(CVE-2024-22386)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation\r\n\r\nfill_route() stores three components in the skb:\r\n\r\n- struct rtmsg\n- RTA_DST (u8)\n- RTA_OIF (u32)\r\n\r\nTherefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use\r\n\r\nNLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) +\nnla_total_size(1) +\nnla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nm68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation\r\n\r\nContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across\nthe switch from \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; to \u0026apos;next\u0026apos; tasks. This does rely on interrupts\nremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.\r\n\r\nThis condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context\nswitching between already running processes, because both \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; and\n\u0026apos;next\u0026apos; already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the\nstatus register.\r\n\r\nThe situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status\nregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.\nUpon restoring the \u0026apos;next\u0026apos; thread\u0026apos;s status register in switch_to() aka\nresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then\nreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue\nlock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).\r\n\r\nA timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released\nin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the\ncurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as\nreported by Guenter Roeck.\r\n\r\nAs far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit\n533e6903bea0 (\u0026quot;m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()\u0026quot;)\nbut I haven\u0026apos;t done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well\npredate that commit.\r\n\r\nInterrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for\nkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when\nfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when\nswitching the tasks\u0026apos; register sets in resume().\r\n\r\nNote that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here\n- this leaves enough of a race for the \u0026apos;spinlock recursion\u0026apos; warning to\nstill be observed.\r\n\r\nTested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).(CVE-2024-38613)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core\r\n\r\nThe seg6_input() function is responsible for adding the SRH into a\npacket, delegating the operation to the seg6_input_core(). This function\nuses the skb_cow_head() to ensure that there is sufficient headroom in\nthe sk_buff for accommodating the link-layer header.\nIn the event that the skb_cow_header() function fails, the\nseg6_input_core() catches the error but it does not release the sk_buff,\nwhich will result in a memory leak.\r\n\r\nThis issue was introduced in commit af3b5158b89d (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix BUG due\nto headroom too small after SRH push\u0026quot;) and persists even after commit\n7a3f5b0de364 (\u0026quot;netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane\u0026quot;),\nwhere the entire seg6_input() code was refactored to deal with netfilter\nhooks.\r\n\r\nThe proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by requiring the\nseg6_input_core() function to release the sk_buff in the event that\nskb_cow_head() fails.(CVE-2024-39490)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: hisilicon/sec - Fix memory leak for sec resource release\r\n\r\nThe AIV is one of the SEC resources. When releasing resources,\nit need to release the AIV resources at the same time.\nOtherwise, memory leakage occurs.\r\n\r\nThe aiv resource release is added to the sec resource release\nfunction.(CVE-2024-41002)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/sclp: Fix sclp_init() cleanup on failure\r\n\r\nIf sclp_init() fails it only partially cleans up: if there are multiple\nfailing calls to sclp_init() sclp_state_change_event will be added several\ntimes to sclp_reg_list, which results in the following warning:\r\n\r\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nlist_add double add: new=000003ffe1598c10, prev=000003ffe1598bf0, next=000003ffe1598c10.\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8\nCPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3\nKrnl PSW : 0404c00180000000 000003ffe0d6076a (__list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8)\n R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3\n...\nCall Trace:\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d6076a\u0026gt;] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xe2/0xf8\n([\u0026lt;000003ffe0d60766\u0026gt;] __list_add_valid_or_report+0xde/0xf8)\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0a8d37e\u0026gt;] sclp_init+0x40e/0x450\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe00009f2\u0026gt;] do_one_initcall+0x42/0x1e0\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe15b77a6\u0026gt;] do_initcalls+0x126/0x150\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe15b7a0a\u0026gt;] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ba/0x1f8\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d6650e\u0026gt;] kernel_init+0x2e/0x180\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe000301c\u0026gt;] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60\n [\u0026lt;000003ffe0d759ca\u0026gt;] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30\r\n\r\nFix this by removing sclp_state_change_event from sclp_reg_list when\nsclp_init() fails.(CVE-2024-41068)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check pipe offset before setting vblank\r\n\r\npipe_ctx has a size of MAX_PIPES so checking its index before accessing\nthe array.\r\n\r\nThis fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-42120)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer check for kzalloc\r\n\r\n[Why \u0026amp; How]\nCheck return pointer of kzalloc before using it.(CVE-2024-42122)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nprotect the fetch of -\u0026gt;fd[fd] in do_dup2() from mispredictions\r\n\r\nboth callers have verified that fd is not greater than -\u0026gt;max_fds;\nhowever, misprediction might end up with\n tofree = fdt-\u0026gt;fd[fd];\nbeing speculatively executed. That\u0026apos;s wrong for the same reasons\nwhy it\u0026apos;s wrong in close_fd()/file_close_fd_locked(); the same\nsolution applies - array_index_nospec(fd, fdt-\u0026gt;max_fds) could differ\nfrom fd only in case of speculative execution on mispredicted path.(CVE-2024-42265)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()\r\n\r\niucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context.\niucv-\u0026gt;path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of\nsevering the path (or it is already removed / never existed).\nThis needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a\nsmall window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has\nalready been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by\niucv_tasklet_fn().\r\n\r\nExample:\n[452744.123844] Call Trace:\n[452744.123845] ([\u0026lt;0000001e87f03880\u0026gt;] 0x1e87f03880)\n[452744.123966] [\u0026lt;00000000d593001e\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138\n[452744.124330] [\u0026lt;000003ff801ddbca\u0026gt;] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124336] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e01b6\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124341] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e08cc\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124345] [\u0026lt;00000000d574794e\u0026gt;] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8\n[452744.124815] [\u0026lt;00000000d5747a0c\u0026gt;] sock_close+0x34/0x48\n[452744.124820] [\u0026lt;00000000d5421642\u0026gt;] __fput+0xba/0x268\n[452744.124826] [\u0026lt;00000000d51b382c\u0026gt;] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0\n[452744.124832] [\u0026lt;00000000d5145710\u0026gt;] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90\n[452744.124841] [\u0026lt;00000000d5978096\u0026gt;] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8\n[452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n[452744.125321] [\u0026lt;00000000d5930018\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138\n[452744.125324]\n[452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt\r\n\r\nNote that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against\nprocess context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and\ncorresponding handling is missing.\r\n\r\nIdeas for a future clean-up patch:\nA) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in\nRe-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the\ntasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.\r\n\r\nB) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t dereference *sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(*sp).(CVE-2024-42280)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Fix a segment issue when downgrading gso_size\r\n\r\nLinearize the skb when downgrading gso_size because it may trigger a\nBUG_ON() later when the skb is segmented as described in [1,2].(CVE-2024-42281)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: Return non-zero value from tipc_udp_addr2str() on error\r\n\r\ntipc_udp_addr2str() should return non-zero value if the UDP media\naddress is invalid. Otherwise, a buffer overflow access can occur in\ntipc_media_addr_printf(). Fix this by returning 1 on an invalid UDP\nmedia address.(CVE-2024-42284)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/iwcm: Fix a use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs\r\n\r\niw_conn_req_handler() associates a new struct rdma_id_private (conn_id) with\nan existing struct iw_cm_id (cm_id) as follows:\r\n\r\n conn_id-\u0026gt;cm_id.iw = cm_id;\n cm_id-\u0026gt;context = conn_id;\n cm_id-\u0026gt;cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;\r\n\r\nrdma_destroy_id() frees both the cm_id and the struct rdma_id_private. Make\nsure that cm_work_handler() does not trigger a use-after-free by only\nfreeing of the struct rdma_id_private after all pending work has finished.(CVE-2024-42285)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to don\u0026apos;t dirty inode for readonly filesystem\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports f2fs bug as below:\r\n\r\nkernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:933!\nRIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x1576/0x1590 fs/f2fs/inode.c:933\nCall Trace:\n evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664\n dispose_list fs/inode.c:697 [inline]\n evict_inodes+0x5f8/0x690 fs/inode.c:747\n generic_shutdown_super+0x9d/0x2c0 fs/super.c:675\n kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1667\n kill_f2fs_super+0x303/0x3b0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4894\n deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x130 fs/super.c:484\n cleanup_mnt+0x426/0x4c0 fs/namespace.c:1256\n task_work_run+0x24a/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180\n ptrace_notify+0x2cd/0x380 kernel/signal.c:2399\n ptrace_report_syscall include/linux/ptrace.h:411 [inline]\n ptrace_report_syscall_exit include/linux/ptrace.h:473 [inline]\n syscall_exit_work kernel/entry/common.c:251 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare kernel/entry/common.c:278 [inline]\n __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x15c/0x280 kernel/entry/common.c:296\n do_syscall_64+0x50/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:88\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nThe root cause is:\n- do_sys_open\n - f2fs_lookup\n - __f2fs_find_entry\n - f2fs_i_depth_write\n - f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync\n - f2fs_dirty_inode\n - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE)\r\n\r\n- umount\n - kill_f2fs_super\n - kill_block_super\n - generic_shutdown_super\n - sync_filesystem\n : sb is readonly, skip sync_filesystem()\n - evict_inodes\n - iput\n - f2fs_evict_inode\n - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))\n : trigger kernel panic\r\n\r\nWhen we try to repair i_current_depth in readonly filesystem, let\u0026apos;s\nskip dirty inode to avoid panic in later f2fs_evict_inode().(CVE-2024-42297)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports a issue as follows:\n============================================\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe\nPGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341\n ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451\n ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline]\n ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214\n[...]\n============================================\r\n\r\nThe immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry\nfor the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of\nbounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.\r\n\r\n do_split\n unsigned split\n dx_make_map\n count = 1\n split = count/2 = 0;\n continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;\n ---\u0026gt; map[4294967295]\r\n\r\nThe maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024,\nso it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or\nequal to 2 when do_split() is called.\r\n\r\nBut syzbot\u0026apos;s crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry\ndistribution in dirblock is as follows:\r\n\r\n bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free\n|xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............|\n0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024\r\n\r\nSo when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole\nnor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is\ncalled.\r\n\r\nIn make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the\ndirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root\nbecause they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved\nto the new leaf block. That\u0026apos;s why count is equal to 1.\r\n\r\nTherefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity\nchecks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above\nissue.(CVE-2024-42305)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer\r\n\r\n[why \u0026amp; how]\nNeed to make sure plane_state is initialized\nbefore accessing its members.\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 295d91cbc700651782a60572f83c24861607b648)(CVE-2024-42308)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs\r\n\r\nThis change rejects the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and\nKVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 ioctls when called on a ucontrol VM.\nThis is necessary since ucontrol VMs have kvm-\u0026gt;arch.gmap set to 0 and\nwould thus result in a null pointer dereference further in.\nMemory management needs to be performed in userspace and using the\nioctls KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP and KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP.\r\n\r\nAlso improve s390 specific documentation for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION\nand KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2.\r\n\r\n[frankja@linux.ibm.com: commit message spelling fix, subject prefix fix](CVE-2024-43819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit\r\n\r\nWhen doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an\nuninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does\nnot detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will\nreturn immediately without initializing the \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; variable.\r\n\r\nBecause \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an\ninfinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.\r\n\r\nThis commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure\nin function ext4_es_find_extent_range().\r\n\r\nThanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\r\n\r\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()\r\n\r\nAn UAF can happen when /proc/cpuset is read as reported in [1].\r\n\r\nThis can be reproduced by the following methods:\n1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the\n cgroup_path_ns function.\n2.$cat /proc/\u0026lt;pid\u0026gt;/cpuset repeatly.\n3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/\n$umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/ repeatly.\r\n\r\nThe race that cause this bug can be shown as below:\r\n\r\n(umount)\t\t|\t(cat /proc/\u0026lt;pid\u0026gt;/cpuset)\ncss_release\t\t|\tproc_cpuset_show\ncss_release_work_fn\t|\tcss = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id);\ncss_free_rwork_fn\t|\tcgroup_path_ns(css-\u0026gt;cgroup, ...);\ncgroup_destroy_root\t|\tmutex_lock(\u0026amp;cgroup_mutex);\nrebind_subsystems\t|\ncgroup_free_root \t|\n\t\t\t|\t// cgrp was freed, UAF\n\t\t\t|\tcgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);\r\n\r\nWhen the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp\nwill point to \u0026amp;cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will\nallocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated\n\u0026amp;cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed,\ntop_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to \u0026amp;cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases\nwhere the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1\nis cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is\nsubsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be\nfreed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never\nbe released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted.\nThis means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does\nnot guarantee that css.cgrp-\u0026gt;root will not be freed.\r\n\r\nFix this problem by using rcu_read_lock in proc_cpuset_show().\nAs cgroup_root is kfree_rcu after commit d23b5c577715\n(\u0026quot;cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe\u0026quot;),\ncss-\u0026gt;cgroup won\u0026apos;t be freed during the critical section.\nTo call cgroup_path_ns_locked, css_set_lock is needed, so it is safe to\nreplace task_get_css with task_css.\r\n\r\n[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd(CVE-2024-43853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nremoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL\r\n\r\nIn imx_rproc_addr_init() \u0026quot;nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()\u0026quot; just counts\nnumber of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in\nthe parsing loop (0 \u0026lt; a \u0026lt; nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced.\nAdjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters](CVE-2024-43860)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: usb: qmi_wwan: fix memory leak for not ip packets\r\n\r\nFree the unused skb when not ip packets arrive.(CVE-2024-43861)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Always drain health in shutdown callback\r\n\r\nThere is no point in recovery during device shutdown. if health\nwork started need to wait for it to avoid races and NULL pointer\naccess.\r\n\r\nHence, drain health WQ on shutdown callback.(CVE-2024-43866)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: handle 2x996 RU allocation in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he()\r\n\r\nCurrently NL80211_RATE_INFO_HE_RU_ALLOC_2x996 is not handled in\ncfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), leading to below warning:\r\n\r\nkernel: invalid HE MCS: bw:6, ru:6\nkernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2312 at net/wireless/util.c:1501 cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he+0x22b/0x270 [cfg80211]\r\n\r\nFix it by handling 2x996 RU allocation in the same way as 160 MHz bandwidth.(CVE-2024-43879)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nexec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage\r\n\r\nWhen opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is\ndone against the file\u0026apos;s metadata at that moment, and on success, a file\npointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file\nmetadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how\nto set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the\npermissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges.\r\n\r\nFor example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not\nset-id:\r\n\r\n---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nto set-id and non-executable:\r\n\r\n---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nit is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been\ndisallowed.\r\n\r\nWhile this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been\nobserved (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating\nthe setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being\nworld-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid\nbit. For example, \u0026quot;chmod o-x,u+s target\u0026quot; makes \u0026quot;target\u0026quot; executable only\nby uid \u0026quot;root\u0026quot; and gid \u0026quot;cdrom\u0026quot;, while also becoming setuid-root:\r\n\r\n-rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nbecomes:\r\n\r\n-rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target\r\n\r\nBut racing the chmod means users without group \u0026quot;cdrom\u0026quot; membership can\nget the permission to execute \u0026quot;target\u0026quot; just before the chmod, and when\nthe chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the\nsetuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of \u0026quot;only cdrom\ngroup members can setuid to root\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nRe-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata\nhas changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time,\nbut until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a\nfull inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that\nthis is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.(CVE-2024-43882)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2080",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:33Z",
"published": "2024-08-30T11:07:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2080"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47292"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47504"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47556"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48639"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48642"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48643"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48644"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48647"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48648"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48656"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48663"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48873"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48896"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48899"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52901"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22386"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42281"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42285"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42297"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42308"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43882"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47292",
"CVE-2021-47504",
"CVE-2021-47556",
"CVE-2022-48634",
"CVE-2022-48639",
"CVE-2022-48642",
"CVE-2022-48643",
"CVE-2022-48644",
"CVE-2022-48647",
"CVE-2022-48648",
"CVE-2022-48656",
"CVE-2022-48663",
"CVE-2022-48671",
"CVE-2022-48672",
"CVE-2022-48675",
"CVE-2022-48686",
"CVE-2022-48687",
"CVE-2022-48691",
"CVE-2022-48873",
"CVE-2022-48896",
"CVE-2022-48898",
"CVE-2022-48899",
"CVE-2022-48920",
"CVE-2022-48935",
"CVE-2023-52893",
"CVE-2023-52898",
"CVE-2023-52901",
"CVE-2023-52903",
"CVE-2024-22386",
"CVE-2024-36946",
"CVE-2024-38613",
"CVE-2024-39490",
"CVE-2024-41002",
"CVE-2024-41068",
"CVE-2024-42120",
"CVE-2024-42122",
"CVE-2024-42265",
"CVE-2024-42271",
"CVE-2024-42280",
"CVE-2024-42281",
"CVE-2024-42284",
"CVE-2024-42285",
"CVE-2024-42297",
"CVE-2024-42305",
"CVE-2024-42308",
"CVE-2024-43819",
"CVE-2024-43828",
"CVE-2024-43831",
"CVE-2024-43853",
"CVE-2024-43860",
"CVE-2024-43861",
"CVE-2024-43866",
"CVE-2024-43879",
"CVE-2024-43882"
]
}
oesa-2024-2296
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: Fix null pointer deref when receiving skb during sock creation
The panic below is observed when receiving ICMP packets with secmark set while an ICMP raw socket is being created. SK_CTX(sk)->label is updated in apparmor_socket_post_create(), but the packet is delivered to the socket before that, causing the null pointer dereference. Drop the packet if label context is not set.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000004c
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 407 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.4.12-arch1-1 #1 3e6fa2753a2d75925c34ecb78e22e85a65d083df
Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 05/28/2020
RIP: 0010:aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40
Code: 00 00 48 89 ef e8 d5 25 0c 00 e9 66 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 66 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 89 f0 <8b> 77 4c 39 c6 7e 1f 48 63 d0 48 8d 14 d7 eb 0b 83 c0 01 48 83 c2
RSP: 0018:ffffa92940003b08 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000000e
RDX: ffffa92940003be8 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff8b57471e7800 R08: ffff8b574c642400 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: ffffffffbd820eeb R11: ffffffffbeb7ff00 R12: ffff8b574c642400
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fb092ea7640(0000) GS:ffff8b577bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000000004c CR3: 00000001020f2005 CR4: 00000000007706f0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
? __die+0x23/0x70
? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0
? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x180
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
? aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40
apparmor_secmark_check+0xec/0x330
security_sock_rcv_skb+0x35/0x50
sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x250
sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason+0x20/0x60
raw_rcv+0x13c/0x210
raw_local_deliver+0x1f3/0x250
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4f/0x2f0
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x76/0xa0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x89/0xa0
netif_receive_skb+0x119/0x170
? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x3d/0x140
vmxnet3_rq_rx_complete+0xb23/0x1010 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]
vmxnet3_poll_rx_only+0x36/0xb0 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]
__napi_poll+0x28/0x1b0
net_rx_action+0x2a4/0x380
__do_softirq+0xd1/0x2c8
__irq_exit_rcu+0xbb/0xf0
common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
RIP: 0010:apparmor_socket_post_create+0xb/0x200
Code: 08 48 85 ff 75 a1 eb b1 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 <55> 48 89 fd 53 45 85 c0 0f 84 b2 00 00 00 48 8b 1d 80 56 3f 02 48
RSP: 0018:ffffa92940ce7e50 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: ffffffffbc756440 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8b574eaab740
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8b57444cec70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff8b574eaab740 R15: ffffffffbd8e4748
? __pfx_apparmor_socket_post_create+0x10/0x10
security_socket_post_create+0x4b/0x80
__sock_create+0x176/0x1f0
__sys_socket+0x89/0x100
__x64_sys_socket+0x17/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc(CVE-2023-52889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout
Add a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it in the nftables per-netns area.
Update set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the timestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane transaction is still unfinished.
.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the current time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump also since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is async gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs asynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: msft: fix slab-use-after-free in msft_do_close()
Tying the msft->data lifetime to hdev by freeing it in hci_release_dev() to fix the following case:
[use] msft_do_close() msft = hdev->msft_data; if (!msft) ...(1) <- passed. return; mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock); ...(4) <- used after freed.
[free] msft_unregister() msft = hdev->msft_data; hdev->msft_data = NULL; ...(2) kfree(msft); ...(3) <- msft is freed.
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0x8f/0xc30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888106cbbca8 by task kworker/u5:2/309(CVE-2024-36012)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ppdev: Add an error check in register_device
In register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked, in witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.
To address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When the index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port should be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: qca: fix info leak when fetching fw build id
Add the missing sanity checks and move the 255-byte build-id buffer off the stack to avoid leaking stack data through debugfs in case the build-info reply is malformed.(CVE-2024-36032)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)" branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: qca: add missing firmware sanity checks
Add the missing sanity checks when parsing the firmware files before downloading them to avoid accessing and corrupting memory beyond the vmalloced buffer.(CVE-2024-36880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect
Christoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8 8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe <0f> 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4 RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000 R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline] mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline] __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615 mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767 process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline] worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243 </TASK>
When fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt is not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value into snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level re-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send buffer cleanup using 'bad' snd_una values.
We could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such dumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very low to zero impact in practice.
Instead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq, for consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete
FFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue pending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the FFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a soft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks like the following:
DWC3 Gadget FFS Application
dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ... --> dwc3_stop_active_transfers() --> dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN) --> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel() --> usb_ep_free_request() --> usb_ep_dequeue()
There is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion handler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is running in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application. As the completion call frees the USB request (io_data->req) the FFS application is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can lead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.
commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently") relocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). However, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the spinlock can't be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as usb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the function driver's completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading into a deadlock.
Fix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to ffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data->req to NULL after freeing it within the ffs->eps_lock. This resolves the race condition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue attempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the ffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is done referencing it.
This fix depends on commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently")(CVE-2024-36894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Drivers: hv: vmbus: Don't free ring buffers that couldn't be re-encrypted
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
The VMBus ring buffer code could free decrypted/shared pages if set_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the struct vmbus_gpadl for the ring buffers to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36909)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
uio_hv_generic: Don't free decrypted memory
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
The VMBus device UIO driver could free decrypted/shared pages if set_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hv_netvsc: Don't free decrypted memory
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
The netvsc driver could free decrypted/shared pages if set_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36911)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Drivers: hv: vmbus: Leak pages if set_memory_encrypted() fails
In CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause set_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an error is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to take care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared) memory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security issues.
VMBus code could free decrypted pages if set_memory_encrypted()/decrypted() fails. Leak the pages if this happens.(CVE-2024-36913)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_setsockopt() unsafe copies
syzbot reported unsafe calls to copy_from_sockptr() [1]
Use copy_safe_from_sockptr() instead.
[1]
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88801caa1ec3 by task syz-executor459/5078
CPU: 0 PID: 5078 Comm: syz-executor459 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3b1/0x720 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75 RIP: 0033:0x7f7fac07fd89 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 91 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff660eb788 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f7fac07fd89 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000118 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000020000a80 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000(CVE-2024-36915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Check bloom filter map value size
This patch adds a missing check to bloom filter creating, rejecting values above KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. This brings the bloom map in line with many other map types.
The lack of this protection can cause kernel crashes for value sizes that overflow int's. Such a crash was caught by syzkaller. The next patch adds more guard-rails at a lower level.(CVE-2024-36918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: mpi3mr: Avoid memcpy field-spanning write WARNING
When the "storcli2 show" command is executed for eHBA-9600, mpi3mr driver prints this WARNING message:
memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 128) of single field "bsg_reply_buf->reply_buf" at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 (size 1) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12760 at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 mpi3mr_bsg_request+0x6b12/0x7f10 [mpi3mr]
The cause of the WARN is 128 bytes memcpy to the 1 byte size array "__u8 replay_buf[1]" in the struct mpi3mr_bsg_in_reply_buf. The array is intended to be a flexible length array, so the WARN is a false positive.
To suppress the WARN, remove the constant number '1' from the array declaration and clarify that it has flexible length. Also, adjust the memory allocation size to match the change.(CVE-2024-36920)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: guard against invalid STA ID on removal
Guard against invalid station IDs in iwl_mvm_mld_rm_sta_id as that would result in out-of-bounds array accesses. This prevents issues should the driver get into a bad state during error handling.(CVE-2024-36921)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: read txq->read_ptr under lock
If we read txq->read_ptr without lock, we can read the same value twice, then obtain the lock, and reclaim from there to two different places, but crucially reclaim the same entry twice, resulting in the WARN_ONCE() a little later. Fix that by reading txq->read_ptr under lock.(CVE-2024-36922)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb() tests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a race condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL while __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the skb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.
Check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4->flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL on the socket.
Also, fl4->fl4_icmp_type and fl4->fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These are union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by flowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.
Initialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline] ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508 raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128 ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365 raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
efi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept
Commit 50e782a86c98 ("efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by parallel memory acceptance") has released the spinlock so other CPUs can do memory acceptance in parallel and not triggers softlockup on other CPUs.
However the softlock up was intermittent shown up if the memory of the TD guest is large, and the timeout of softlockup is set to 1 second:
RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore Call Trace: ? __hrtimer_run_queues <IRQ> ? hrtimer_interrupt ? watchdog_timer_fn ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt </IRQ> ? __hrtimer_run_queues <TASK> ? hrtimer_interrupt ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt accept_memory try_to_accept_memory do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page get_page_from_freelist __handle_mm_fault __alloc_pages __folio_alloc ? __tdx_hypercall handle_mm_fault vma_alloc_folio do_user_addr_fault do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page exc_page_fault ? __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page asm_exc_page_fault __handle_mm_fault
When the local irq is enabled at the end of accept_memory(), the softlockup detects that the watchdog on single CPU has not been fed for a while. That is to say, even other CPUs will not be blocked by spinlock, the current CPU might be stunk with local irq disabled for a while, which hurts not only nmi watchdog but also softlockup.
Chao Gao pointed out that the memory accept could be time costly and there was similar report before. Thus to avoid any softlocup detection during this stage, give the softlockup a flag to skip the timeout check at the end of accept_memory(), by invoking touch_softlockup_watchdog().(CVE-2024-36936)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()
The "pctldev" struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(). It's a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(), so freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.
The devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys the mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: nl80211: don't free NULL coalescing rule
If the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation
fill_route() stores three components in the skb:
- struct rtmsg
- RTA_DST (u8)
- RTA_OIF (u32)
Therefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use
NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) + nla_total_size(1) + nla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracefs: Reset permissions on remount if permissions are options
There's an inconsistency with the way permissions are handled in tracefs. Because the permissions are generated when accessed, they default to the root inode's permission if they were never set by the user. If the user sets the permissions, then a flag is set and the permissions are saved via the inode (for tracefs files) or an internal attribute field (for eventfs).
But if a remount happens that specify the permissions, all the files that were not changed by the user gets updated, but the ones that were are not. If the user were to remount the file system with a given permission, then all files and directories within that file system should be updated.
This can cause security issues if a file's permission was updated but the admin forgot about it. They could incorrectly think that remounting with permissions set would update all files, but miss some.
For example:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing # chgrp 1002 current_tracer # ls -l [..] -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions
Where current_tracer now has group "lkp".
# mount -o remount,gid=1001 . # ls -l -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions
Everything changed but the "current_tracer".
Add a new link list that keeps track of all the tracefs_inodes which has the permission flags that tell if the file/dir should use the root inode's permission or not. Then on remount, clear all the flags so that the default behavior of using the root inode's permission is done for all files and directories.(CVE-2024-36963)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race
__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when sk->dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.
RCU rules are that we must first clear sk->sk_dst_cache, then call dst_release(old_dst).
Note that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly, while __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.
Given that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic against RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three ->negative_advice() existing methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.
Note the check against NULL dst is centralized in __dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate it in various callbacks.
Many thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.
This old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv
Reinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex lock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger the following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct stmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing this initialization.
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29 Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 sp : ffffffc0864e3570 x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003 x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000 x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8 x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698 x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027 x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068 mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34 tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0 taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling
mlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns true. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via mlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED. In the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory leaks:
mlx5e_probe _mlx5e_resume mlx5e_attach_netdev mlx5e_nic_enable <-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach() register_netdev <-- failed for some reason. ERROR_FLOW: _mlx5e_suspend <-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren't freed :(
Hence, clean resources in this case as well.
[1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0 ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60 mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core] mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib] __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib] ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90 auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80 ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0 device_add+0x637/0x840 __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0 add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core] mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core] mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90 pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210 ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0 ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80 pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320 sriov_enable+0x208/0x420 mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core] sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path
The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called.
This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency
Validate that first flag is set only for the first
descriptor in multi-buffer packets.
In case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.
A new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries
Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn().
As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case).
The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking.
Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages.
Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis.(CVE-2024-42104)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: an30259a: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization
In this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register() so they are automatically unregistered after module's remove() is done. led_classdev_unregister() calls module's led_set_brightness() to turn off the LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already in module's remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42128)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/pkey: Wipe sensitive data on failure
Wipe sensitive data from stack also if the copy_to_user() fails.(CVE-2024-42157)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: aead,cipher - zeroize key buffer after use
I.G 9.7.B for FIPS 140-3 specifies that variables temporarily holding cryptographic information should be zeroized once they are no longer needed. Accomplish this by using kfree_sensitive for buffers that previously held the private key.(CVE-2024-42229)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
libceph: fix race between delayed_work() and ceph_monc_stop()
The way the delayed work is handled in ceph_monc_stop() is prone to races with mon_fault() and possibly also finish_hunting(). Both of these can requeue the delayed work which wouldn't be canceled by any of the following code in case that happens after cancel_delayed_work_sync() runs -- __close_session() doesn't mess with the delayed work in order to avoid interfering with the hunting interval logic. This part was missed in commit b5d91704f53e ("libceph: behave in mon_fault() if cur_mon < 0") and use-after-free can still ensue on monc and objects that hang off of it, with monc->auth and monc->monmap being particularly susceptible to quickly being reused.
To fix this:
- clear monc->cur_mon and monc->hunting as part of closing the session in ceph_monc_stop()
- bail from delayed_work() if monc->cur_mon is cleared, similar to how it's done in mon_fault() and finish_hunting() (based on monc->hunting)
- call cancel_delayed_work_sync() after the session is closed(CVE-2024-42232)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: configfs: Prevent OOB read/write in usb_string_copy()
Userspace provided string 's' could trivially have the length zero. Left
unchecked this will firstly result in an OOB read in the form
if (str[0 - 1] == '\n') followed closely by an OOB write in the formstr[0 - 1] = '\0'`.
There is already a validating check to catch strings that are too long. Let's supply an additional check for invalid strings that are too short.(CVE-2024-42236)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()
Don't dereference sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(sp).(CVE-2024-42280)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nexthop: Initialize all fields in dumped nexthops
struct nexthop_grp contains two reserved fields that are not initialized by nla_put_nh_group(), and carry garbage. This can be observed e.g. with strace (edited for clarity):
# ip nexthop add id 1 dev lo
# ip nexthop add id 101 group 1
# strace -e recvmsg ip nexthop get id 101
...
recvmsg(... [{nla_len=12, nla_type=NHA_GROUP},
[{id=1, weight=0, resvd1=0x69, resvd2=0x67}]] ...) = 52
The fields are reserved and therefore not currently used. But as they are, they leak kernel memory, and the fact they are not just zero complicates repurposing of the fields for new ends. Initialize the full structure.(CVE-2024-42283)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: validate nvme_local_port correctly
The driver load failed with error message,
qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-ffff:0: register_localport failed: ret=ffffffef
and with a kernel crash,
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070
Workqueue: events_unbound qla_register_fcport_fn [qla2xxx]
RIP: 0010:nvme_fc_register_remoteport+0x16/0x430 [nvme_fc]
RSP: 0018:ffffaaa040eb3d98 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9dfb46b78c00 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff9dfb46b78da8 RSI: ffffaaa040eb3e08 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff9dfb612a0a58 R08: ffffffffaf1d6270 R09: 3a34303a30303030
R10: 34303a303030305b R11: 2078787832616c71 R12: ffff9dfb46b78dd4
R13: ffff9dfb46b78c24 R14: ffff9dfb41525300 R15: ffff9dfb46b78da8
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9dfc67c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000018da10004 CR4: 00000000000206f0
Call Trace:
qla_nvme_register_remote+0xeb/0x1f0 [qla2xxx]
? qla2x00_dfs_create_rport+0x231/0x270 [qla2xxx]
qla2x00_update_fcport+0x2a1/0x3c0 [qla2xxx]
qla_register_fcport_fn+0x54/0xc0 [qla2xxx]
Exit the qla_nvme_register_remote() function when qla_nvme_register_hba() fails and correctly validate nvme_local_port.(CVE-2024-42286)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock
A crash was observed while performing NPIV and FW reset,
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 1 PREEMPT_RT SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffc90026f47b88 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000002 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881041130d0 RBP: ffff8881041130d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000034 R10: ffffc90026f47c48 R11: 0000000000000031 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881565e4a20 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f4c69ed3d00(0000) GS:ffff889faac80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000000288a50002 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x16f/0x4a0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x174/0x7f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x1a0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 ? preempt_count_sub+0x96/0xe0 qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x29f/0x3b0 [qla2xxx] qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x60/0x80 [qla2xxx] __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xa2/0x450 [qla2xxx]
The command completion was done early while aborting the commands in driver unload path but outside lock to avoid the WARN_ON condition of performing dma_free_attr within the lock. However this caused race condition while command completion via multiple paths causing system crash.
Hence complete the command early in unload path but within the lock to avoid race condition.(CVE-2024-42287)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly
During vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash because of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale I/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but I/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx] RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0 ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0 ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830 ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430 ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0 ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0 ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140 ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60 ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? kthread+0x156/0x180 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>
Send out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Handle runtime power management correctly
The power domain is automatically activated from clk_prepare(). However, on certain platforms like i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP, the power-on handling invokes sleeping functions, which triggers the 'scheduling while atomic' bug in the context switch path during device probing:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u13:1/48/0x00000002 Call trace: __schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c __schedule+0x7f0/0xa94 schedule+0x5c/0xc4 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2c0/0x540 __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20 mutex_lock+0x48/0x54 clk_prepare_lock+0x44/0xa0 clk_prepare+0x20/0x44 imx_irqsteer_resume+0x28/0xe0 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x44 __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0x80 genpd_runtime_resume+0xc8/0x2c0 __rpm_callback+0x48/0x1d8 rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78 rpm_resume+0x490/0x6b4 __pm_runtime_resume+0x50/0x94 irq_chip_pm_get+0x2c/0xa0 __irq_do_set_handler+0x178/0x24c irq_set_chained_handler_and_data+0x60/0xa4 mxc_gpio_probe+0x160/0x4b0
Cure this by implementing the irq_bus_lock/sync_unlock() interrupt chip callbacks and handle power management in them as they are invoked from non-atomic context.
tglx: Rewrote change log, added Fixes tag
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kobject_uevent: Fix OOB access within zap_modalias_env()
zap_modalias_env() wrongly calculates size of memory block to move, so will cause OOB memory access issue if variable MODALIAS is not the last one within its @env parameter, fixed by correcting size to memmove.(CVE-2024-42292)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()
Syzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in nilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.
It is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur if the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created block) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.
So, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a possible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.(CVE-2024-42295)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Update log->page_{mask,bits} if log->page_size changed
If an NTFS file system is mounted to another system with different PAGE_SIZE from the original system, log->page_size will change in log_replay(), but log->page_{mask,bits} don't change correspondingly. This will cause a panic because "u32 bytes = log->page_size - page_off" will get a negative value in the later read_log_page().(CVE-2024-42299)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed
Syzbot reports a issue as follows:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe PGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0 Call Trace: <TASK> make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451 ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline] ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214 [...] ============================================
The immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry for the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of bounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.
do_split
unsigned split
dx_make_map
count = 1
split = count/2 = 0;
continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;
---> map[4294967295]
The maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024, so it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or equal to 2 when do_split() is called.
But syzbot's crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry distribution in dirblock is as follows:
bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free |xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............| 0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024
So when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole nor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is called.
In make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the dirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root because they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved to the new leaf block. That's why count is equal to 1.
Therefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity checks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above issue.(CVE-2024-42305)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udf: Avoid using corrupted block bitmap buffer
When the filesystem block bitmap is corrupted, we detect the corruption while loading the bitmap and fail the allocation with error. However the next allocation from the same bitmap will notice the bitmap buffer is already loaded and tries to allocate from the bitmap with mixed results (depending on the exact nature of the bitmap corruption). Fix the problem by using BH_verified bit to indicate whether the bitmap is valid or not.(CVE-2024-42306)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-42308)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/gma500: fix null pointer dereference in psb_intel_lvds_get_modes
In psb_intel_lvds_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42309)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hfs: fix to initialize fields of hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode()
Syzbot reports uninitialized value access issue as below:
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30 hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30 d_revalidate fs/namei.c:862 [inline] lookup_fast+0x89e/0x8e0 fs/namei.c:1649 walk_component fs/namei.c:2001 [inline] link_path_walk+0x817/0x1480 fs/namei.c:2332 path_lookupat+0xd9/0x6f0 fs/namei.c:2485 filename_lookup+0x22e/0x740 fs/namei.c:2515 user_path_at_empty+0x8b/0x390 fs/namei.c:2924 user_path_at include/linux/namei.h:57 [inline] do_mount fs/namespace.c:3689 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x66b/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x140 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline] hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366 block_read_full_folio+0x4ff/0x11b0 fs/buffer.c:2271 hfs_read_folio+0x55/0x60 fs/hfs/inode.c:39 filemap_read_folio+0x148/0x4f0 mm/filemap.c:2426 do_read_cache_folio+0x7c8/0xd90 mm/filemap.c:3553 do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3595 [inline] read_cache_page+0xfb/0x2f0 mm/filemap.c:3604 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:755 [inline] hfs_btree_open+0x928/0x1ae0 fs/hfs/btree.c:78 hfs_mdb_get+0x260c/0x3000 fs/hfs/mdb.c:204 hfs_fill_super+0x1fb1/0x2790 fs/hfs/super.c:406 mount_bdev+0x628/0x920 fs/super.c:1359 hfs_mount+0xcd/0xe0 fs/hfs/super.c:456 legacy_get_tree+0x167/0x2e0 fs/fs_context.c:610 vfs_get_tree+0xdc/0x5d0 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x7a9/0x16f0 fs/namespace.c:3145 path_mount+0xf98/0x26a0 fs/namespace.c:3475 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x919/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3674 __ia32_sys_mount+0x15b/0x1b0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 do_fast_syscall_32+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 do_SYSENTER_32+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82
Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9a6/0xe00 mm/page_alloc.c:4590 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2190 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2354 [inline] new_slab+0x2d7/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2407 slaballoc+0x16b5/0x3970 mm/slub.c:3540 slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3625 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3678 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3850 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x64d/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3018 [inline] hfs_alloc_inode+0x5a/0xc0 fs/hfs/super.c:165 alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1005 [inline] new_inode+0x38/0x4f0 fs/inode.c:1031 hfs_new_inode+0x61/0x1010 fs/hfs/inode.c:186 hfs_mkdir+0x54/0x250 fs/hfs/dir.c:228 vfs_mkdir+0x49a/0x700 fs/namei.c:4126 do_mkdirat+0x529/0x810 fs/namei.c:4149 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4164 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4162 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0xc8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4162 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
It missed to initialize .tz_secondswest, .cached_start and .cached_blocks fields in struct hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode(), fix it.(CVE-2024-42311)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: venus: fix use after free in vdec_close
There appears to be a possible use after free with vdec_close(). The firmware will add buffer release work to the work queue through HFI callbacks as a normal part of decoding. Randomly closing the decoder device from userspace during normal decoding can incur a read after free for inst.
Fix it by cancelling the work in vdec_close.(CVE-2024-42313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service
Use pe directly to resolve sparse warning:
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression(CVE-2024-42322)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: keystone: Fix NULL pointer dereference in case of DT error in ks_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs()
If IORESOURCE_MEM is not provided in Device Tree due to any error, resource_list_first_type() will return NULL and pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() will just emit a warning.
This will cause a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this bug by adding NULL return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43823)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit
When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable.
Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.
This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure in function ext4_es_find_extent_range().
Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
leds: trigger: Unregister sysfs attributes before calling deactivate()
Triggers which have trigger specific sysfs attributes typically store related data in trigger-data allocated by the activate() callback and freed by the deactivate() callback.
Calling device_remove_groups() after calling deactivate() leaves a window where the sysfs attributes show/store functions could be called after deactivation and then operate on the just freed trigger-data.
Move the device_remove_groups() call to before deactivate() to close this race window.
This also makes the deactivation path properly do things in reverse order of the activation path which calls the activate() callback before calling device_add_groups().(CVE-2024-43830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi
Handle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi is valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xdp: fix invalid wait context of page_pool_destroy()
If the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with page_pool_create(). The reference count of page pool is 1 as default. A page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0. page_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a reference count. When a page pool is destroyed, ->disconnect() is called, which is mem_allocator_disconnect(). This function internally acquires mutex_lock().
If the driver uses XDP, it registers a memory model with xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(). The xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() internally increases a page pool reference count if a memory model is a page pool. Now the reference count is 2.
To destroy a page pool, the driver should call both page_pool_destroy() and xdp_unreg_mem_model(). The xdp_unreg_mem_model() internally calls page_pool_destroy(). Only page_pool_destroy() decreases a reference count.
If a driver calls page_pool_destroy() then xdp_unreg_mem_model(), we will face an invalid wait context warning. Because xdp_unreg_mem_model() calls page_pool_destroy() with rcu_read_lock(). The page_pool_destroy() internally acquires mutex_lock().
Splat looks like:
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 Tainted: G W
ethtool/1806 is trying to lock: ffffffff90387b90 (mem_id_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 3 locks held by ethtool/1806: stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1806 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 f916f41f172891c800f2fed Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0 __lock_acquire+0x1681/0x4de0 ? _printk+0x64/0xe0 ? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfxlockacquire+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b3/0x580 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x16/0xc0 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xc0 __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1690 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_prb_read_valid+0x10/0x10 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_llist_add_batch+0x10/0x10 ? console_unlock+0x193/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbe/0x140 ? __pfxmutexlock+0x10/0x10 ? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x16/0x90 ? irq_work_queue_local+0x1e5/0x330 ? irq_work_queue+0x39/0x50 ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x79/0xc0 ? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150 ? __pfx_mem_allocator_disconnect+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0 page_pool_release+0x36e/0x6d0 page_pool_destroy+0xd7/0x440 xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x1a7/0x2a0 ? __pfx_xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x10/0x10 ? kfree+0x125/0x370 ? bnxt_free_ring.isra.0+0x2eb/0x500 ? bnxt_free_mem+0x5ac/0x2500 xdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x4a/0xd0 bnxt_free_mem+0x1356/0x2500 bnxt_close_nic+0xf0/0x3b0 ? __pfx_bnxt_close_nic+0x10/0x10 ? ethnl_parse_bit+0x2c6/0x6d0 ? __pfxnlavalidate_parse+0x10/0x10 ? pfx_ethnl_parse_bit+0x10/0x10 bnxt_set_features+0x2a8/0x3e0 __netdev_update_features+0x4dc/0x1370 ? ethnl_parse_bitset+0x4ff/0x750 ? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bitset+0x10/0x10 ? __pfxnetdevupdate_features+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x70 ? pm_runtime_resume+0x7d/0x110 ethnl_set_features+0x32d/0xa20
To fix this problem, it uses rhashtable_lookup_fast() instead of rhashtable_lookup() with rcu_read_lock(). Using xa without rcu_read_lock() here is safe. xa is freed by __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free() and this is called by call_rcu() of mem_xa_remove(). The mem_xa_remove() is called by page_pool_destroy() if a reference count reaches 0. The xa is already protected by the reference count mechanism well in the control plane. So removing rcu_read_lock() for page_pool_destroy() is safe.(CVE-2024-43834)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG
When BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is set, the trampoline calls __bpf_tramp_enter() and __bpf_tramp_exit() functions, passing them the struct bpf_tramp_image *im pointer as an argument in R0.
The trampoline generation code uses emit_addr_mov_i64() to emit instructions for moving the bpf_tramp_image address into R0, but emit_addr_mov_i64() assumes the address to be in the vmalloc() space and uses only 48 bits. Because bpf_tramp_image is allocated using kzalloc(), its address can use more than 48-bits, in this case the trampoline will pass an invalid address to __bpf_tramp_enter/exit() causing a kernel crash.
Fix this by using emit_a64_mov_i64() in place of emit_addr_mov_i64() as it can work with addresses that are greater than 48-bits.(CVE-2024-43840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL
In imx_rproc_addr_init() "nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()" just counts number of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in the parsing loop (0 < a < nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Adjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr
Commit 73f576c04b94 ("mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs") decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the cgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID space. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for modifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace() happen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex from concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr was not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for different memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that.
We have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in our fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of list_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting code. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry and inode), the super_block's list_lru didn't have list_lru_one for the memcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is not allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow memcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but returned success. No evidence were found for these cases.
Looking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg's id is not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs have same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most reasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race between multiple idr_remove() calls or race between idr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing multiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them would cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from other memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one.(CVE-2024-43892)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: core: check uartclk for zero to avoid divide by zero
Calling ioctl TIOCSSERIAL with an invalid baud_base can result in uartclk being zero, which will result in a divide by zero error in uart_get_divisor(). The check for uartclk being zero in uart_set_info() needs to be done before other settings are made as subsequent calls to ioctl TIOCSSERIAL for the same port would be impacted if the uartclk check was done where uartclk gets set.
Oops: divide error: 0000 PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI RIP: 0010:uart_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:580) Call Trace: <TASK> serial8250_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2576 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2589) serial8250_do_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:502 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2741) serial8250_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2862) uart_change_line_settings (./include/linux/spinlock.h:376 ./include/linux/serial_core.h:608 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:222) uart_port_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:342) uart_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:368) uart_set_info (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1034) uart_set_info_user (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1059) tty_set_serial (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2637) tty_ioctl (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2647 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2791) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:907 fs/ioctl.c:893 fs/ioctl.c:893) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Rule: add(CVE-2024-43893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe
In drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to modeset->mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-43894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()
Userspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio descriptor array. Users can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range. Offset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get the gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().
This change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using array_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative information leaks.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race
uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding the lock.
This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a local lockdep key for @dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N
modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
but task is already holding lock: ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30 uevent_show+0xac/0x130 dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0 seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450 vfs_read+0x25b/0x340 ksys_read+0x67/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
-> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0 kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200 __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0 device_del+0x168/0x410 device_unregister+0x13/0x60 devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110 device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210 driver_detach+0x47/0x90 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0 cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential races. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.
Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok
We must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: flowtable: initialise extack before use
Fix missing initialisation of extack in flow offload.(CVE-2024-45018)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check
In case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this combination successfully passes the check 'if (!im_protocols && !tm_protocols)' in the nfc_start_poll(). But then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll() poll mod list will remain empty and dev->poll_mod_count will remain 0 which lead to division by zero.
Normally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is not expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from userspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a broken or malicious program may pass a message containing a "bad" combination of protocol parameter values so that dev->poll_mod_count is not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading to division by zero. Call trace looks like: nfc_genl_start_poll() nfc_start_poll() ->start_poll() pn533_start_poll()
Add poll mod list filling check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-46676)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB
Linux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write protected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction as "write" into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt which causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.
The only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor maps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation tables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like Xen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.
Changing the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC removes dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch fixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.
I tested this on SA8155P with Xen.(CVE-2024-46689)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: ucsi: Move unregister out of atomic section
Commit '9329933699b3 ("soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Make client-lock non-sleeping")' moved the pmic_glink client list under a spinlock, as it is accessed by the rpmsg/glink callback, which in turn is invoked from IRQ context.
This means that ucsi_unregister() is now called from atomic context, which isn't feasible as it's expecting a sleepable context. An effort is under way to get GLINK to invoke its callbacks in a sleepable context, but until then lets schedule the unregistration.
A side effect of this is that ucsi_unregister() can now happen after the remote processor, and thereby the communication link with it, is gone. pmic_glink_send() is amended with a check to avoid the resulting NULL pointer dereference. This does however result in the user being informed about this error by the following entry in the kernel log:
ucsi_glink.pmic_glink_ucsi pmic_glink.ucsi.0: failed to send UCSI write request: -5(CVE-2024-46691)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Fix prime with external buffers
Make sure that for external buffers mapping goes through the dma_buf interface instead of trying to access pages directly.
External buffers might not provide direct access to readable/writable pages so to make sure the bo's created from external dma_bufs can be read dma_buf interface has to be used.
Fixes crashes in IGT's kms_prime with vgem. Regular desktop usage won't trigger this due to the fact that virtual machines will not have multiple GPUs but it enables better test coverage in IGT.(CVE-2024-46709)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor
Remove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role of msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with list_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.
This fixes the path: msgdma_free_chan_resources -> msgdma_free_descriptors -> msgdma_free_desc_list -> msgdma_free_descriptor
which does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not removed from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow
[WHY & HOW] Make sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will never overflow and exceess array size.
This fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46726)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.
The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf() first.
Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL probably didn't work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a ("ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF"). The reason is that the per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self test case but each BPF function expects it.
Remove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.(CVE-2024-46754)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: unset the binding mark of a reused connection
Steve French reported null pointer dereference error from sha256 lib. cifs.ko can send session setup requests on reused connection. If reused connection is used for binding session, conn->binding can still remain true and generate_preauth_hash() will not set sess->Preauth_HashValue and it will be NULL. It is used as a material to create an encryption key in ksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey. ->Preauth_HashValue cause null pointer dereference error from crypto_shash_update().
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 8 PID: 429254 Comm: kworker/8:39 Hardware name: LENOVO 20MAS08500/20MAS08500, BIOS N2CET69W (1.52 ) Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd] RIP: 0010:lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3] <TASK> ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 ? __die+0x24/0x80 ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ee/0x6b0 ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] ? lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3] ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] ? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3] _sha256_update+0x77/0xa0 [sha256_ssse3] sha256_avx2_update+0x15/0x30 [sha256_ssse3] crypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40 hmac_update+0x12/0x20 crypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40 generate_key+0x234/0x380 [ksmbd] generate_smb3encryptionkey+0x40/0x1c0 [ksmbd] ksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey+0x72/0xa0 [ksmbd] ntlm_authenticate.isra.0+0x423/0x5d0 [ksmbd] smb2_sess_setup+0x952/0xaa0 [ksmbd] __process_request+0xa3/0x1d0 [ksmbd] __handle_ksmbd_work+0x1c4/0x2f0 [ksmbd] handle_ksmbd_work+0x2d/0xa0 [ksmbd] process_one_work+0x16c/0x350 worker_thread+0x306/0x440 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xef/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-46795)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix the waring dereferencing hive
Check the amdgpu_hive_info *hive that maybe is NULL.(CVE-2024-46805)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/bridge: tc358767: Check if fully initialized before signalling HPD event via IRQ
Make sure the connector is fully initialized before signalling any HPD events via drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(), otherwise this may lead to NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-46810)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6
[Why] Coverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm initialize.
[How] Return failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4
if ras_manager obj null, don't print NBIO err data(CVE-2024-46819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read
Avoid using the negative values for clk_idex as an index into an array pptable->DpmDescriptor.
V2: fix clk_index return check (Tim Huang)(CVE-2024-46821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry
In a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where a check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was noted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index into a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.
If an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible for the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would then cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger this has not been established, harden this caller against the possibility.(CVE-2024-46822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read
ELF loader uses "randomize_va_space" twice. It is sysctl and can change at any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with unpredictable consequences.
Issue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: Acquire kvm->srcu when handling KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
Grab kvm->srcu when processing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, as KVM will forcibly leave nested VMX/SVM if SMM mode is being toggled, and leaving nested VMX reads guest memory.
Note, kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() can also be called from KVM_RUN via sync_regs(), which already holds SRCU. I.e. trying to precisely use kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() around the problematic SMM code would cause problems. Acquiring SRCU isn't all that expensive, so for simplicity, grab it unconditionally for KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Not tainted
include/linux/kvm_host.h:1027 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by repro/1071: #0: ffff88811e424430 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]
stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 1071 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1a0 kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x168/0x190 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm] nested_vmx_load_msr+0x6b/0x1d0 [kvm_intel] load_vmcs12_host_state+0x432/0xb40 [kvm_intel] vmx_leave_nested+0x30/0x40 [kvm_intel] kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events+0x15d/0x2b0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x1107/0x1750 [kvm] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm] ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm] ? lock_acquire+0xba/0x2d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x40c/0x6f0 ? lock_release+0xb7/0x270 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7ff11eb1b539 </TASK>(CVE-2024-46830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc
We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
Found by static analysis.(CVE-2024-46836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
userfaultfd: don't BUG_ON() if khugepaged yanks our page table
Since khugepaged was changed to allow retracting page tables in file mappings without holding the mmap lock, these BUG_ON()s are wrong - get rid of them.
We could also remove the preceding "if (unlikely(...))" block, but then we could reach pte_offset_map_lock() with transhuge pages not just for file mappings but also for anonymous mappings - which would probably be fine but I think is not necessarily expected.(CVE-2024-46838)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete
In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return -EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information.(CVE-2024-46840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN
When sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer following the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to ETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be reproduced by running
$ ping -s 11 destination(CVE-2024-46854)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks
We must put 'sk' reference before returning.(CVE-2024-46855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync
There are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race condition:
CPU1 CPU2
==== ====
net_rx_action
napi_poll netlink_sendmsg
__napi_poll netlink_unicast
process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel
__netif_receive_skb genl_rcv
__netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb
NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg
ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit
tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit
tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list
tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows
tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr
mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer
mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)
In remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical zone protected by "pm.lock", the entry will be released, which leads to the occurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).
Keeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling sk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of "entry->add_timer".
Move list_del(&entry->list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock, do not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which can avoid similar "entry->x" uaf.(CVE-2024-46858)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses
The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough.
Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.
Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.
For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: stm32/cryp - call finalize with bh disabled
The finalize operation in interrupt mode produce a produces a spinlock recursion warning. The reason is the fact that BH must be disabled during this process.(CVE-2024-47658)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Error out instead on BUG_ON() in IBI DMA setup
Definitely condition dma_get_cache_alignment * defined value > 256 during driver initialization is not reason to BUG_ON(). Turn that to graceful error out with -EINVAL.(CVE-2024-47665)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix state management in error path of log writing function
After commit a694291a6211 ("nilfs2: separate wait function from nilfs_segctor_write") was applied, the log writing function nilfs_segctor_do_construct() was able to issue I/O requests continuously even if user data blocks were split into multiple logs across segments, but two potential flaws were introduced in its error handling.
First, if nilfs_segctor_begin_construction() fails while creating the second or subsequent logs, the log writing function returns without calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(), so the writeback flag set on pages/folios will remain uncleared. This causes page cache operations to hang waiting for the writeback flag. For example, truncate_inode_pages_final(), which is called via nilfs_evict_inode() when an inode is evicted from memory, will hang.
Second, the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag set on normal inodes remain uncleared. As a result, if the next log write involves checkpoint creation, that's fine, but if a partial log write is performed that does not, inodes with NILFS_I_COLLECTED set are erroneously removed from the "sc_dirty_files" list, and their data and b-tree blocks may not be written to the device, corrupting the block mapping.
Fix these issues by uniformly calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction() on failure of each step in the loop in nilfs_segctor_do_construct(), having it clean up logs and segment usages according to progress, and correcting the conditions for calling nilfs_redirty_inodes() to ensure that the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag is cleared.(CVE-2024-47669)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak
The syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write, we need to clear the structure before filling fields.(CVE-2024-47671)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don't wait for tx queues if firmware is dead
There is a WARNING in iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() (that was recently converted from just a message), that can be hit if we wait for TX queues to become empty after firmware died. Clearly, we can't expect anything from the firmware after it's declared dead.
Don't call iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() in this case. While it could be a good idea to stop the flow earlier, the flush functions do some maintenance work that is not related to the firmware, so keep that part of the code running even when the firmware is not running.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() goes to the error_free label and frees the array of bpf_uprobe's without calling bpf_uprobe_unregister(). This leaks bpf_uprobe->uprobe and worse, this frees bpf_uprobe->consumer without removing it from the uprobe->consumers list.(CVE-2024-47675)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/perf: Fix ali_drw_pmu driver interrupt status clearing The alibaba_uncore_pmu driver forgot to clear all interrupt status in the interrupt processing function. After the PMU counter overflow interrupt occurred, an interrupt storm occurred, causing the system to hang. Therefore, clear the correct interrupt status in the interrupt handling function to fix it.(CVE-2024-47731)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future.(CVE-2024-47741)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-47.0.0.52.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\napparmor: Fix null pointer deref when receiving skb during sock creation\r\n\r\nThe panic below is observed when receiving ICMP packets with secmark set\nwhile an ICMP raw socket is being created. SK_CTX(sk)-\u0026gt;label is updated\nin apparmor_socket_post_create(), but the packet is delivered to the\nsocket before that, causing the null pointer dereference.\nDrop the packet if label context is not set.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000004c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n CPU: 0 PID: 407 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.4.12-arch1-1 #1 3e6fa2753a2d75925c34ecb78e22e85a65d083df\n Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 05/28/2020\n RIP: 0010:aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40\n Code: 00 00 48 89 ef e8 d5 25 0c 00 e9 66 ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 66 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 89 f0 \u0026lt;8b\u0026gt; 77 4c 39 c6 7e 1f 48 63 d0 48 8d 14 d7 eb 0b 83 c0 01 48 83 c2\n RSP: 0018:ffffa92940003b08 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000000e\n RDX: ffffa92940003be8 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n RBP: ffff8b57471e7800 R08: ffff8b574c642400 R09: 0000000000000002\n R10: ffffffffbd820eeb R11: ffffffffbeb7ff00 R12: ffff8b574c642400\n R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 00007fb092ea7640(0000) GS:ffff8b577bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000004c CR3: 00000001020f2005 CR4: 00000000007706f0\n PKRU: 55555554\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x23/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x180\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n ? aa_label_next_confined+0xb/0x40\n apparmor_secmark_check+0xec/0x330\n security_sock_rcv_skb+0x35/0x50\n sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x250\n sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason+0x20/0x60\n raw_rcv+0x13c/0x210\n raw_local_deliver+0x1f3/0x250\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x4f/0x2f0\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x76/0xa0\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x89/0xa0\n netif_receive_skb+0x119/0x170\n ? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x3d/0x140\n vmxnet3_rq_rx_complete+0xb23/0x1010 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]\n vmxnet3_poll_rx_only+0x36/0xb0 [vmxnet3 56a84f9c97178c57a43a24ec073b45a9d6f01f3a]\n __napi_poll+0x28/0x1b0\n net_rx_action+0x2a4/0x380\n __do_softirq+0xd1/0x2c8\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xbb/0xf0\n common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40\n RIP: 0010:apparmor_socket_post_create+0xb/0x200\n Code: 08 48 85 ff 75 a1 eb b1 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 \u0026lt;55\u0026gt; 48 89 fd 53 45 85 c0 0f 84 b2 00 00 00 48 8b 1d 80 56 3f 02 48\n RSP: 0018:ffffa92940ce7e50 EFLAGS: 00000286\n RAX: ffffffffbc756440 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8b574eaab740\n RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: ffff8b57444cec70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003\n R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff8b574eaab740 R15: ffffffffbd8e4748\n ? __pfx_apparmor_socket_post_create+0x10/0x10\n security_socket_post_create+0x4b/0x80\n __sock_create+0x176/0x1f0\n __sys_socket+0x89/0x100\n __x64_sys_socket+0x17/0x20\n do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90\n ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90\n ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90\n ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc(CVE-2023-52889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout\r\n\r\nAdd a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it\nin the nftables per-netns area.\r\n\r\nUpdate set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the\ntimestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane\ntransaction is still unfinished.\r\n\r\n.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the\ncurrent time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump\nalso since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is\nasync gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs\nasynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: msft: fix slab-use-after-free in msft_do_close()\r\n\r\nTying the msft-\u0026gt;data lifetime to hdev by freeing it in\nhci_release_dev() to fix the following case:\r\n\r\n[use]\nmsft_do_close()\n msft = hdev-\u0026gt;msft_data;\n if (!msft) ...(1) \u0026lt;- passed.\n return;\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;msft-\u0026gt;filter_lock); ...(4) \u0026lt;- used after freed.\r\n\r\n[free]\nmsft_unregister()\n msft = hdev-\u0026gt;msft_data;\n hdev-\u0026gt;msft_data = NULL; ...(2)\n kfree(msft); ...(3) \u0026lt;- msft is freed.\r\n\r\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common\nkernel/locking/mutex.c:587 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock+0x8f/0xc30\nkernel/locking/mutex.c:752\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff888106cbbca8 by task kworker/u5:2/309(CVE-2024-36012)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nppdev: Add an error check in register_device\r\n\r\nIn register_device, the return value of ida_simple_get is unchecked,\nin witch ida_simple_get will use an invalid index value.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, index should be checked after ida_simple_get. When\nthe index value is abnormal, a warning message should be printed, the port\nshould be dropped, and the value should be recorded.(CVE-2024-36015)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: qca: fix info leak when fetching fw build id\r\n\r\nAdd the missing sanity checks and move the 255-byte build-id buffer off\nthe stack to avoid leaking stack data through debugfs in case the\nbuild-info reply is malformed.(CVE-2024-36032)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too\r\n\r\nIt is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the\nblamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a\ncycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of\nentry intervals.\r\n\r\nWe need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must\nbe larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule\nentries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle\ntime came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so\nwe move the existing \u0026quot;cycle == 0\u0026quot; check outside the \u0026quot;if \u0026quot;(!new-\u0026gt;cycle_time)\u0026quot;\nbranch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.\r\n\r\nAdd a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: qca: add missing firmware sanity checks\r\n\r\nAdd the missing sanity checks when parsing the firmware files before\ndownloading them to avoid accessing and corrupting memory beyond the\nvmalloced buffer.(CVE-2024-36880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect\r\n\r\nChristoph reported a splat hinting at a corrupted snd_una:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 38 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005 __mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-gbbeac67456c9 #59\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events mptcp_worker\n RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0x4b3/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1005\n Code: be 06 01 00 00 bf 06 01 00 00 e8 a8 12 e7 fe e9 00 fe ff ff e8\n \t8e 1a e7 fe 0f b7 ab 3e 02 00 00 e9 d3 fd ff ff e8 7d 1a e7 fe\n \t\u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 4c 8b bb e0 05 00 00 e9 74 fc ff ff e8 6a 1a e7 fe 0f 0b e9\n RSP: 0018:ffffc9000013fd48 EFLAGS: 00010293\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881029bd280 RCX: ffffffff82382fe4\n RDX: ffff8881003cbd00 RSI: ffffffff823833c3 RDI: 0000000000000001\n RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888138ba8000\n R13: 0000000000000106 R14: ffff8881029bd908 R15: ffff888126560000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f604a5dae38 CR3: 0000000101dac002 CR4: 0000000000170ef0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1055 [inline]\n mptcp_clean_una_wakeup net/mptcp/protocol.c:1062 [inline]\n __mptcp_retrans+0x7f/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2615\n mptcp_worker+0x434/0x740 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2767\n process_one_work+0x1e0/0x560 kernel/workqueue.c:3254\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x3c7/0x640 kernel/workqueue.c:3416\n kthread+0x121/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x44/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nWhen fallback to TCP happens early on a client socket, snd_nxt\nis not yet initialized and any incoming ack will copy such value\ninto snd_una. If the mptcp worker (dumbly) tries mptcp-level\nre-injection after such ack, that would unconditionally trigger a send\nbuffer cleanup using \u0026apos;bad\u0026apos; snd_una values.\r\n\r\nWe could easily disable re-injection for fallback sockets, but such\ndumb behavior already helped catching a few subtle issues and a very\nlow to zero impact in practice.\r\n\r\nInstead address the issue always initializing snd_nxt (and write_seq,\nfor consistency) at connect time.(CVE-2024-36889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete\r\n\r\nFFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue\npending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the\nFFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a\nsoft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks\nlike the following:\r\n\r\n DWC3 Gadget FFS Application\ndwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ...\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_stop_active_transfers()\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN)\n --\u0026gt; ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel()\n --\u0026gt; usb_ep_free_request() --\u0026gt; usb_ep_dequeue()\r\n\r\nThere is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion\nhandler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is\nrunning in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application.\nAs the completion call frees the USB request (io_data-\u0026gt;req) the FFS\napplication is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can\nlead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.\r\n\r\ncommit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status consistently\u0026quot;)\nrelocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete().\nHowever, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the\nspinlock can\u0026apos;t be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as\nusb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the\nfunction driver\u0026apos;s completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading\ninto a deadlock.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to\nffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data-\u0026gt;req\nto NULL after freeing it within the ffs-\u0026gt;eps_lock. This resolves the race\ncondition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue\nattempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the\nffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is\ndone referencing it.\r\n\r\nThis fix depends on\n commit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status\n consistently\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nDrivers: hv: vmbus: Don\u0026apos;t free ring buffers that couldn\u0026apos;t be re-encrypted\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nThe VMBus ring buffer code could free decrypted/shared pages if\nset_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the struct\nvmbus_gpadl for the ring buffers to decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36909)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nuio_hv_generic: Don\u0026apos;t free decrypted memory\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nThe VMBus device UIO driver could free decrypted/shared pages if\nset_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl\nto decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhv_netvsc: Don\u0026apos;t free decrypted memory\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nThe netvsc driver could free decrypted/shared pages if\nset_memory_decrypted() fails. Check the decrypted field in the gpadl\nto decide whether to free the memory.(CVE-2024-36911)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nDrivers: hv: vmbus: Leak pages if set_memory_encrypted() fails\r\n\r\nIn CoCo VMs it is possible for the untrusted host to cause\nset_memory_encrypted() or set_memory_decrypted() to fail such that an\nerror is returned and the resulting memory is shared. Callers need to\ntake care to handle these errors to avoid returning decrypted (shared)\nmemory to the page allocator, which could lead to functional or security\nissues.\r\n\r\nVMBus code could free decrypted pages if set_memory_encrypted()/decrypted()\nfails. Leak the pages if this happens.(CVE-2024-36913)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_setsockopt() unsafe copies\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported unsafe calls to copy_from_sockptr() [1]\r\n\r\nUse copy_safe_from_sockptr() instead.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88801caa1ec3 by task syz-executor459/5078\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 5078 Comm: syz-executor459 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n nfc_llcp_setsockopt+0x6c2/0x850 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:255\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x3b1/0x720 net/socket.c:2311\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\nRIP: 0033:0x7f7fac07fd89\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 91 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fff660eb788 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f7fac07fd89\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000118 RDI: 0000000000000004\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000020000a80 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000(CVE-2024-36915)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Check bloom filter map value size\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a missing check to bloom filter creating, rejecting\nvalues above KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. This brings the bloom map in line with\nmany other map types.\r\n\r\nThe lack of this protection can cause kernel crashes for value sizes\nthat overflow int\u0026apos;s. Such a crash was caught by syzkaller. The next\npatch adds more guard-rails at a lower level.(CVE-2024-36918)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: mpi3mr: Avoid memcpy field-spanning write WARNING\r\n\r\nWhen the \u0026quot;storcli2 show\u0026quot; command is executed for eHBA-9600, mpi3mr driver\nprints this WARNING message:\r\n\r\n memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 128) of single field \u0026quot;bsg_reply_buf-\u0026gt;reply_buf\u0026quot; at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 (size 1)\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12760 at drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_app.c:1658 mpi3mr_bsg_request+0x6b12/0x7f10 [mpi3mr]\r\n\r\nThe cause of the WARN is 128 bytes memcpy to the 1 byte size array \u0026quot;__u8\nreplay_buf[1]\u0026quot; in the struct mpi3mr_bsg_in_reply_buf. The array is intended\nto be a flexible length array, so the WARN is a false positive.\r\n\r\nTo suppress the WARN, remove the constant number \u0026apos;1\u0026apos; from the array\ndeclaration and clarify that it has flexible length. Also, adjust the\nmemory allocation size to match the change.(CVE-2024-36920)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: guard against invalid STA ID on removal\r\n\r\nGuard against invalid station IDs in iwl_mvm_mld_rm_sta_id as that would\nresult in out-of-bounds array accesses. This prevents issues should the\ndriver get into a bad state during error handling.(CVE-2024-36921)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: read txq-\u0026gt;read_ptr under lock\r\n\r\nIf we read txq-\u0026gt;read_ptr without lock, we can read the same\nvalue twice, then obtain the lock, and reclaim from there\nto two different places, but crucially reclaim the same\nentry twice, resulting in the WARN_ONCE() a little later.\nFix that by reading txq-\u0026gt;read_ptr under lock.(CVE-2024-36922)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb()\ntests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a\nrace condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL\nwhile __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the\nskb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.\r\n\r\nCheck FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4-\u0026gt;flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL\non the socket.\r\n\r\nAlso, fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_type and fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These\nare union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by\nflowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.\r\n\r\nInitialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline]\n ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508\n raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128\n ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365\n raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nefi/unaccepted: touch soft lockup during memory accept\r\n\r\nCommit 50e782a86c98 (\u0026quot;efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by\nparallel memory acceptance\u0026quot;) has released the spinlock so other CPUs can\ndo memory acceptance in parallel and not triggers softlockup on other\nCPUs.\r\n\r\nHowever the softlock up was intermittent shown up if the memory of the\nTD guest is large, and the timeout of softlockup is set to 1 second:\r\n\r\n RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore\n Call Trace:\n ? __hrtimer_run_queues\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? hrtimer_interrupt\n ? watchdog_timer_fn\n ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn\n ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n ? __hrtimer_run_queues\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? hrtimer_interrupt\n ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore\n ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt\n accept_memory\n try_to_accept_memory\n do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page\n get_page_from_freelist\n __handle_mm_fault\n __alloc_pages\n __folio_alloc\n ? __tdx_hypercall\n handle_mm_fault\n vma_alloc_folio\n do_user_addr_fault\n do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page\n exc_page_fault\n ? __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page\n asm_exc_page_fault\n __handle_mm_fault\r\n\r\nWhen the local irq is enabled at the end of accept_memory(), the\nsoftlockup detects that the watchdog on single CPU has not been fed for\na while. That is to say, even other CPUs will not be blocked by\nspinlock, the current CPU might be stunk with local irq disabled for a\nwhile, which hurts not only nmi watchdog but also softlockup.\r\n\r\nChao Gao pointed out that the memory accept could be time costly and\nthere was similar report before. Thus to avoid any softlocup detection\nduring this stage, give the softlockup a flag to skip the timeout check\nat the end of accept_memory(), by invoking touch_softlockup_watchdog().(CVE-2024-36936)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()\r\n\r\nThe \u0026quot;pctldev\u0026quot; struct is allocated in devm_pinctrl_register_and_init().\nIt\u0026apos;s a devm_ managed pointer that is freed by devm_pinctrl_dev_release(),\nso freeing it in pinctrl_enable() will lead to a double free.\r\n\r\nThe devm_pinctrl_dev_release() function frees the pindescs and destroys\nthe mutex as well.(CVE-2024-36940)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: nl80211: don\u0026apos;t free NULL coalescing rule\r\n\r\nIf the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet: fix rtm_phonet_notify() skb allocation\r\n\r\nfill_route() stores three components in the skb:\r\n\r\n- struct rtmsg\n- RTA_DST (u8)\n- RTA_OIF (u32)\r\n\r\nTherefore, rtm_phonet_notify() should use\r\n\r\nNLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtmsg)) +\nnla_total_size(1) +\nnla_total_size(4)(CVE-2024-36946)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracefs: Reset permissions on remount if permissions are options\r\n\r\nThere\u0026apos;s an inconsistency with the way permissions are handled in tracefs.\nBecause the permissions are generated when accessed, they default to the\nroot inode\u0026apos;s permission if they were never set by the user. If the user\nsets the permissions, then a flag is set and the permissions are saved via\nthe inode (for tracefs files) or an internal attribute field (for\neventfs).\r\n\r\nBut if a remount happens that specify the permissions, all the files that\nwere not changed by the user gets updated, but the ones that were are not.\nIf the user were to remount the file system with a given permission, then\nall files and directories within that file system should be updated.\r\n\r\nThis can cause security issues if a file\u0026apos;s permission was updated but the\nadmin forgot about it. They could incorrectly think that remounting with\npermissions set would update all files, but miss some.\r\n\r\nFor example:\r\n\r\n # cd /sys/kernel/tracing\n # chgrp 1002 current_tracer\n # ls -l\n[..]\n -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb\n -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer\n -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events\n -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info\n -r--r----- 1 root root 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions\r\n\r\nWhere current_tracer now has group \u0026quot;lkp\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\n # mount -o remount,gid=1001 .\n # ls -l\n -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_subbuf_size_kb\n -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 buffer_total_size_kb\n -rw-r----- 1 root lkp 0 May 1 21:25 current_tracer\n -rw-r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dynamic_events\n -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 dyn_ftrace_total_info\n -r--r----- 1 root tracing 0 May 1 21:25 enabled_functions\r\n\r\nEverything changed but the \u0026quot;current_tracer\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nAdd a new link list that keeps track of all the tracefs_inodes which has\nthe permission flags that tell if the file/dir should use the root inode\u0026apos;s\npermission or not. Then on remount, clear all the flags so that the\ndefault behavior of using the root inode\u0026apos;s permission is done for all\nfiles and directories.(CVE-2024-36963)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix __dst_negative_advice() race\r\n\r\n__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when\nsk-\u0026gt;dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.\r\n\r\nRCU rules are that we must first clear sk-\u0026gt;sk_dst_cache,\nthen call dst_release(old_dst).\r\n\r\nNote that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly,\nwhile __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.\r\n\r\nGiven that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic\nagainst RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three -\u0026gt;negative_advice()\nexisting methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.\r\n\r\nNote the check against NULL dst is centralized in\n__dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate\nit in various callbacks.\r\n\r\nMany thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.\r\n\r\nThis old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: stmmac: move the EST lock to struct stmmac_priv\r\n\r\nReinitialize the whole EST structure would also reset the mutex\nlock which is embedded in the EST structure, and then trigger\nthe following warning. To address this, move the lock to struct\nstmmac_priv. We also need to reacquire the mutex lock when doing\nthis initialization.\r\n\r\nDEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock-\u0026gt;magic != lock)\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 505 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:587 __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 3 PID: 505 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-00053-g0106679839f7-dirty #29\n Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT)\n pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n lr : __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n sp : ffffffc0864e3570\n x29: ffffffc0864e3570 x28: ffffffc0817bdc78 x27: 0000000000000003\n x26: ffffff80c54f1808 x25: ffffff80c9164080 x24: ffffffc080d723ac\n x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc083bc3000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: ffffffc08117b080 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: ffffff80d2d40000\n x14: 00000000000002da x13: ffffff80d2d404b8 x12: ffffffc082b5a5c8\n x11: ffffffc082bca680 x10: ffffffc082bb2640 x9 : ffffffc082bb2698\n x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000000001\n x5 : ffffff8178fe0d48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027\n x2 : ffffff8178fe0d50 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000\n Call trace:\n __mutex_lock+0xd84/0x1068\n mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x34\n tc_setup_taprio+0x118/0x68c\n stmmac_setup_tc+0x50/0xf0\n taprio_change+0x868/0xc9c(CVE-2024-38594)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling\r\n\r\nmlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns\ntrue. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via\nmlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED.\nIn the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory\nleaks:\r\n\r\nmlx5e_probe\n _mlx5e_resume\n mlx5e_attach_netdev\n mlx5e_nic_enable \u0026lt;-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach()\n register_netdev \u0026lt;-- failed for some reason.\nERROR_FLOW:\n _mlx5e_suspend \u0026lt;-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren\u0026apos;t freed :(\r\n\r\nHence, clean resources in this case as well.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0010 [#1] SMP\nCPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:0x0\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6.\nRSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x20/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60\n mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib]\n __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib]\n ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90\n auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80\n ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0\n device_add+0x637/0x840\n __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0\n add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core]\n local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90\n pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210\n ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0\n ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80\n pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320\n sriov_enable+0x208/0x420\n mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n CR2: 0000000000000000\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path\r\n\r\nThe error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL\nis not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the\ngenl_unregister_family() isn\u0026apos;t called.\r\n\r\nThis issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: add option to control\nlwtunnel support\u0026quot;), and commit 5559cea2d5aa (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix possible\nuse-after-free and null-ptr-deref\u0026quot;) replaced unregister_pernet_subsys()\nwith genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ena: Add validation for completion descriptors consistency\r\n\r\nValidate that `first` flag is set only for the first\ndescriptor in multi-buffer packets.\nIn case of an invalid descriptor, a reset will occur.\nA new reset reason for RX data corruption has been added.(CVE-2024-40999)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of\ncorrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata\nfile inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn().\r\n\r\nAs Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file\ngets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(),\ntries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case).\r\n\r\nThe inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers\nof these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are\nread without checking.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as\nerrors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages.\r\n\r\nAlso thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer\nanalysis.(CVE-2024-42104)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: an30259a: Use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization\r\n\r\nIn this driver LEDs are registered using devm_led_classdev_register()\nso they are automatically unregistered after module\u0026apos;s remove() is done.\nled_classdev_unregister() calls module\u0026apos;s led_set_brightness() to turn off\nthe LEDs and that callback uses mutex which was destroyed already\nin module\u0026apos;s remove() so use devm API instead.(CVE-2024-42128)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/pkey: Wipe sensitive data on failure\r\n\r\nWipe sensitive data from stack also if the copy_to_user() fails.(CVE-2024-42157)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: aead,cipher - zeroize key buffer after use\r\n\r\nI.G 9.7.B for FIPS 140-3 specifies that variables temporarily holding\ncryptographic information should be zeroized once they are no longer\nneeded. Accomplish this by using kfree_sensitive for buffers that\npreviously held the private key.(CVE-2024-42229)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlibceph: fix race between delayed_work() and ceph_monc_stop()\r\n\r\nThe way the delayed work is handled in ceph_monc_stop() is prone to\nraces with mon_fault() and possibly also finish_hunting(). Both of\nthese can requeue the delayed work which wouldn\u0026apos;t be canceled by any of\nthe following code in case that happens after cancel_delayed_work_sync()\nruns -- __close_session() doesn\u0026apos;t mess with the delayed work in order\nto avoid interfering with the hunting interval logic. This part was\nmissed in commit b5d91704f53e (\u0026quot;libceph: behave in mon_fault() if\ncur_mon \u0026lt; 0\u0026quot;) and use-after-free can still ensue on monc and objects\nthat hang off of it, with monc-\u0026gt;auth and monc-\u0026gt;monmap being\nparticularly susceptible to quickly being reused.\r\n\r\nTo fix this:\r\n\r\n- clear monc-\u0026gt;cur_mon and monc-\u0026gt;hunting as part of closing the session\n in ceph_monc_stop()\n- bail from delayed_work() if monc-\u0026gt;cur_mon is cleared, similar to how\n it\u0026apos;s done in mon_fault() and finish_hunting() (based on monc-\u0026gt;hunting)\n- call cancel_delayed_work_sync() after the session is closed(CVE-2024-42232)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: configfs: Prevent OOB read/write in usb_string_copy()\r\n\r\nUserspace provided string \u0026apos;s\u0026apos; could trivially have the length zero. Left\nunchecked this will firstly result in an OOB read in the form\n`if (str[0 - 1] == \u0026apos;\\n\u0026apos;) followed closely by an OOB write in the form\n`str[0 - 1] = \u0026apos;\\0\u0026apos;`.\r\n\r\nThere is already a validating check to catch strings that are too long.\nLet\u0026apos;s supply an additional check for invalid strings that are too short.(CVE-2024-42236)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmISDN: Fix a use after free in hfcmulti_tx()\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t dereference *sp after calling dev_kfree_skb(*sp).(CVE-2024-42280)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: nexthop: Initialize all fields in dumped nexthops\r\n\r\nstruct nexthop_grp contains two reserved fields that are not initialized by\nnla_put_nh_group(), and carry garbage. This can be observed e.g. with\nstrace (edited for clarity):\r\n\r\n # ip nexthop add id 1 dev lo\n # ip nexthop add id 101 group 1\n # strace -e recvmsg ip nexthop get id 101\n ...\n recvmsg(... [{nla_len=12, nla_type=NHA_GROUP},\n [{id=1, weight=0, resvd1=0x69, resvd2=0x67}]] ...) = 52\r\n\r\nThe fields are reserved and therefore not currently used. But as they are, they\nleak kernel memory, and the fact they are not just zero complicates repurposing\nof the fields for new ends. Initialize the full structure.(CVE-2024-42283)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: validate nvme_local_port correctly\r\n\r\nThe driver load failed with error message,\r\n\r\nqla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-ffff:0: register_localport failed: ret=ffffffef\r\n\r\nand with a kernel crash,\r\n\r\n\tBUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070\n\tWorkqueue: events_unbound qla_register_fcport_fn [qla2xxx]\n\tRIP: 0010:nvme_fc_register_remoteport+0x16/0x430 [nvme_fc]\n\tRSP: 0018:ffffaaa040eb3d98 EFLAGS: 00010282\n\tRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9dfb46b78c00 RCX: 0000000000000000\n\tRDX: ffff9dfb46b78da8 RSI: ffffaaa040eb3e08 RDI: 0000000000000000\n\tRBP: ffff9dfb612a0a58 R08: ffffffffaf1d6270 R09: 3a34303a30303030\n\tR10: 34303a303030305b R11: 2078787832616c71 R12: ffff9dfb46b78dd4\n\tR13: ffff9dfb46b78c24 R14: ffff9dfb41525300 R15: ffff9dfb46b78da8\n\tFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9dfc67c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n\tCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n\tCR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000018da10004 CR4: 00000000000206f0\n\tCall Trace:\n\tqla_nvme_register_remote+0xeb/0x1f0 [qla2xxx]\n\t? qla2x00_dfs_create_rport+0x231/0x270 [qla2xxx]\n\tqla2x00_update_fcport+0x2a1/0x3c0 [qla2xxx]\n\tqla_register_fcport_fn+0x54/0xc0 [qla2xxx]\r\n\r\nExit the qla_nvme_register_remote() function when qla_nvme_register_hba()\nfails and correctly validate nvme_local_port.(CVE-2024-42286)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock\r\n\r\nA crash was observed while performing NPIV and FW reset,\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 1 PREEMPT_RT SMP NOPTI\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffc90026f47b88 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000002\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881041130d0\n RBP: ffff8881041130d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000034\n R10: ffffc90026f47c48 R11: 0000000000000031 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881565e4a20 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 00007f4c69ed3d00(0000) GS:ffff889faac80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000000288a50002 CR4: 00000000007706e0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n PKRU: 55555554\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x16f/0x4a0\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x174/0x7f0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x1a0\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n ? preempt_count_sub+0x96/0xe0\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x29f/0x3b0 [qla2xxx]\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x60/0x80 [qla2xxx]\n __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xa2/0x450 [qla2xxx]\r\n\r\nThe command completion was done early while aborting the commands in driver\nunload path but outside lock to avoid the WARN_ON condition of performing\ndma_free_attr within the lock. However this caused race condition while\ncommand completion via multiple paths causing system crash.\r\n\r\nHence complete the command early in unload path but within the lock to\navoid race condition.(CVE-2024-42287)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly\r\n\r\nDuring vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash\nbecause of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale\nI/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but\nI/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx]\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0\n RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8\n R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0\n ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0\n ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830\n ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430\n ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0\n ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0\n ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140\n ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60\n ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? kthread+0x156/0x180\n ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nSend out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nirqchip/imx-irqsteer: Handle runtime power management correctly\r\n\r\nThe power domain is automatically activated from clk_prepare(). However, on\ncertain platforms like i.MX8QM and i.MX8QXP, the power-on handling invokes\nsleeping functions, which triggers the \u0026apos;scheduling while atomic\u0026apos; bug in the\ncontext switch path during device probing:\r\n\r\n BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u13:1/48/0x00000002\n Call trace:\n __schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c\n __schedule+0x7f0/0xa94\n schedule+0x5c/0xc4\n schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40\n __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x2c0/0x540\n __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20\n mutex_lock+0x48/0x54\n clk_prepare_lock+0x44/0xa0\n clk_prepare+0x20/0x44\n imx_irqsteer_resume+0x28/0xe0\n pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x44\n __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0x80\n genpd_runtime_resume+0xc8/0x2c0\n __rpm_callback+0x48/0x1d8\n rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78\n rpm_resume+0x490/0x6b4\n __pm_runtime_resume+0x50/0x94\n irq_chip_pm_get+0x2c/0xa0\n __irq_do_set_handler+0x178/0x24c\n irq_set_chained_handler_and_data+0x60/0xa4\n mxc_gpio_probe+0x160/0x4b0\r\n\r\nCure this by implementing the irq_bus_lock/sync_unlock() interrupt chip\ncallbacks and handle power management in them as they are invoked from\nnon-atomic context.\r\n\r\n[ tglx: Rewrote change log, added Fixes tag ](CVE-2024-42290)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkobject_uevent: Fix OOB access within zap_modalias_env()\r\n\r\nzap_modalias_env() wrongly calculates size of memory block to move, so\nwill cause OOB memory access issue if variable MODALIAS is not the last\none within its @env parameter, fixed by correcting size to memmove.(CVE-2024-42292)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in\nnilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.\r\n\r\nIt is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur\nif the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created\nblock) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to\ncorruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.\r\n\r\nSo, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a\npossible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.(CVE-2024-42295)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Update log-\u0026gt;page_{mask,bits} if log-\u0026gt;page_size changed\r\n\r\nIf an NTFS file system is mounted to another system with different\nPAGE_SIZE from the original system, log-\u0026gt;page_size will change in\nlog_replay(), but log-\u0026gt;page_{mask,bits} don\u0026apos;t change correspondingly.\nThis will cause a panic because \u0026quot;u32 bytes = log-\u0026gt;page_size - page_off\u0026quot;\nwill get a negative value in the later read_log_page().(CVE-2024-42299)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: check dot and dotdot of dx_root before making dir indexed\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports a issue as follows:\n============================================\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffed11022e24fe\nPGD 23ffee067 P4D 23ffee067 PUD 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor306 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-g55027e689933 #0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n make_indexed_dir+0xdaf/0x13c0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2341\n ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2451\n ext4_rename fs/ext4/namei.c:3936 [inline]\n ext4_rename2+0x26e5/0x4370 fs/ext4/namei.c:4214\n[...]\n============================================\r\n\r\nThe immediate cause of this problem is that there is only one valid dentry\nfor the block to be split during do_split, so split==0 results in out of\nbounds accesses to the map triggering the issue.\r\n\r\n do_split\n unsigned split\n dx_make_map\n count = 1\n split = count/2 = 0;\n continued = hash2 == map[split - 1].hash;\n ---\u0026gt; map[4294967295]\r\n\r\nThe maximum length of a filename is 255 and the minimum block size is 1024,\nso it is always guaranteed that the number of entries is greater than or\nequal to 2 when do_split() is called.\r\n\r\nBut syzbot\u0026apos;s crafted image has no dot and dotdot in dir, and the dentry\ndistribution in dirblock is as follows:\r\n\r\n bus dentry1 hole dentry2 free\n|xx--|xx-------------|...............|xx-------------|...............|\n0 12 (8+248)=256 268 256 524 (8+256)=264 788 236 1024\r\n\r\nSo when renaming dentry1 increases its name_len length by 1, neither hole\nnor free is sufficient to hold the new dentry, and make_indexed_dir() is\ncalled.\r\n\r\nIn make_indexed_dir() it is assumed that the first two entries of the\ndirblock must be dot and dotdot, so bus and dentry1 are left in dx_root\nbecause they are treated as dot and dotdot, and only dentry2 is moved\nto the new leaf block. That\u0026apos;s why count is equal to 1.\r\n\r\nTherefore add the ext4_check_dx_root() helper function to add more sanity\nchecks to dot and dotdot before starting the conversion to avoid the above\nissue.(CVE-2024-42305)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudf: Avoid using corrupted block bitmap buffer\r\n\r\nWhen the filesystem block bitmap is corrupted, we detect the corruption\nwhile loading the bitmap and fail the allocation with error. However the\nnext allocation from the same bitmap will notice the bitmap buffer is\nalready loaded and tries to allocate from the bitmap with mixed results\n(depending on the exact nature of the bitmap corruption). Fix the\nproblem by using BH_verified bit to indicate whether the bitmap is valid\nor not.(CVE-2024-42306)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-42308)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/gma500: fix null pointer dereference in psb_intel_lvds_get_modes\r\n\r\nIn psb_intel_lvds_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-42309)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhfs: fix to initialize fields of hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode()\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports uninitialized value access issue as below:\r\n\r\nloop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64\n=====================================================\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30\n hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30\n d_revalidate fs/namei.c:862 [inline]\n lookup_fast+0x89e/0x8e0 fs/namei.c:1649\n walk_component fs/namei.c:2001 [inline]\n link_path_walk+0x817/0x1480 fs/namei.c:2332\n path_lookupat+0xd9/0x6f0 fs/namei.c:2485\n filename_lookup+0x22e/0x740 fs/namei.c:2515\n user_path_at_empty+0x8b/0x390 fs/namei.c:2924\n user_path_at include/linux/namei.h:57 [inline]\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3689 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x66b/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x140 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366\n hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline]\n hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366\n block_read_full_folio+0x4ff/0x11b0 fs/buffer.c:2271\n hfs_read_folio+0x55/0x60 fs/hfs/inode.c:39\n filemap_read_folio+0x148/0x4f0 mm/filemap.c:2426\n do_read_cache_folio+0x7c8/0xd90 mm/filemap.c:3553\n do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3595 [inline]\n read_cache_page+0xfb/0x2f0 mm/filemap.c:3604\n read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:755 [inline]\n hfs_btree_open+0x928/0x1ae0 fs/hfs/btree.c:78\n hfs_mdb_get+0x260c/0x3000 fs/hfs/mdb.c:204\n hfs_fill_super+0x1fb1/0x2790 fs/hfs/super.c:406\n mount_bdev+0x628/0x920 fs/super.c:1359\n hfs_mount+0xcd/0xe0 fs/hfs/super.c:456\n legacy_get_tree+0x167/0x2e0 fs/fs_context.c:610\n vfs_get_tree+0xdc/0x5d0 fs/super.c:1489\n do_new_mount+0x7a9/0x16f0 fs/namespace.c:3145\n path_mount+0xf98/0x26a0 fs/namespace.c:3475\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x919/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3674\n __ia32_sys_mount+0x15b/0x1b0 fs/namespace.c:3674\n do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]\n __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178\n do_fast_syscall_32+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203\n do_SYSENTER_32+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246\n entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n __alloc_pages+0x9a6/0xe00 mm/page_alloc.c:4590\n __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]\n alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2190 [inline]\n allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2354 [inline]\n new_slab+0x2d7/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2407\n ___slab_alloc+0x16b5/0x3970 mm/slub.c:3540\n __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3625 [inline]\n __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3678 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3850 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x64d/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3879\n alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3018 [inline]\n hfs_alloc_inode+0x5a/0xc0 fs/hfs/super.c:165\n alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:260\n new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1005 [inline]\n new_inode+0x38/0x4f0 fs/inode.c:1031\n hfs_new_inode+0x61/0x1010 fs/hfs/inode.c:186\n hfs_mkdir+0x54/0x250 fs/hfs/dir.c:228\n vfs_mkdir+0x49a/0x700 fs/namei.c:4126\n do_mkdirat+0x529/0x810 fs/namei.c:4149\n __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4164 [inline]\n __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4162 [inline]\n __x64_sys_mkdirat+0xc8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4162\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nIt missed to initialize .tz_secondswest, .cached_start and .cached_blocks\nfields in struct hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode(), fix it.(CVE-2024-42311)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: venus: fix use after free in vdec_close\r\n\r\nThere appears to be a possible use after free with vdec_close().\nThe firmware will add buffer release work to the work queue through\nHFI callbacks as a normal part of decoding. Randomly closing the\ndecoder device from userspace during normal decoding can incur\na read after free for inst.\r\n\r\nFix it by cancelling the work in vdec_close.(CVE-2024-42313)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipvs: properly dereference pe in ip_vs_add_service\r\n\r\nUse pe directly to resolve sparse warning:\r\n\r\n net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1471:27: warning: dereference of noderef expression(CVE-2024-42322)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: keystone: Fix NULL pointer dereference in case of DT error in ks_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs()\r\n\r\nIf IORESOURCE_MEM is not provided in Device Tree due to\nany error, resource_list_first_type() will return NULL and\npci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() will just emit a warning.\r\n\r\nThis will cause a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this bug by adding NULL\nreturn check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43823)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit\r\n\r\nWhen doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an\nuninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does\nnot detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will\nreturn immediately without initializing the \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; variable.\r\n\r\nBecause \u0026apos;es\u0026apos; contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an\ninfinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.\r\n\r\nThis commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure\nin function ext4_es_find_extent_range().\r\n\r\nThanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!(CVE-2024-43828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nleds: trigger: Unregister sysfs attributes before calling deactivate()\r\n\r\nTriggers which have trigger specific sysfs attributes typically store\nrelated data in trigger-data allocated by the activate() callback and\nfreed by the deactivate() callback.\r\n\r\nCalling device_remove_groups() after calling deactivate() leaves a window\nwhere the sysfs attributes show/store functions could be called after\ndeactivation and then operate on the just freed trigger-data.\r\n\r\nMove the device_remove_groups() call to before deactivate() to close\nthis race window.\r\n\r\nThis also makes the deactivation path properly do things in reverse order\nof the activation path which calls the activate() callback before calling\ndevice_add_groups().(CVE-2024-43830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Handle invalid decoder vsi\r\n\r\nHandle an invalid decoder vsi in vpu_dec_init to ensure the decoder vsi\nis valid for future use.(CVE-2024-43831)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxdp: fix invalid wait context of page_pool_destroy()\r\n\r\nIf the driver uses a page pool, it creates a page pool with\npage_pool_create().\nThe reference count of page pool is 1 as default.\nA page pool will be destroyed only when a reference count reaches 0.\npage_pool_destroy() is used to destroy page pool, it decreases a\nreference count.\nWhen a page pool is destroyed, -\u0026gt;disconnect() is called, which is\nmem_allocator_disconnect().\nThis function internally acquires mutex_lock().\r\n\r\nIf the driver uses XDP, it registers a memory model with\nxdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model().\nThe xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() internally increases a page pool\nreference count if a memory model is a page pool.\nNow the reference count is 2.\r\n\r\nTo destroy a page pool, the driver should call both page_pool_destroy()\nand xdp_unreg_mem_model().\nThe xdp_unreg_mem_model() internally calls page_pool_destroy().\nOnly page_pool_destroy() decreases a reference count.\r\n\r\nIf a driver calls page_pool_destroy() then xdp_unreg_mem_model(), we\nwill face an invalid wait context warning.\nBecause xdp_unreg_mem_model() calls page_pool_destroy() with\nrcu_read_lock().\nThe page_pool_destroy() internally acquires mutex_lock().\r\n\r\nSplat looks like:\n=============================\n[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]\n6.10.0-rc6+ #4 Tainted: G W\n-----------------------------\nethtool/1806 is trying to lock:\nffffffff90387b90 (mem_id_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\nother info that might help us debug this:\ncontext-{5:5}\n3 locks held by ethtool/1806:\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 0 PID: 1806 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc6+ #4 f916f41f172891c800f2fed\nHardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\ndump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0\n__lock_acquire+0x1681/0x4de0\n? _printk+0x64/0xe0\n? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10\n? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\nlock_acquire+0x1b3/0x580\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x16/0xc0\n? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10\n? dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xc0\n__mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1690\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __pfx_prb_read_valid+0x10/0x10\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __pfx_llist_add_batch+0x10/0x10\n? console_unlock+0x193/0x1b0\n? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbe/0x140\n? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10\n? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x16/0x90\n? __irq_work_queue_local+0x1e5/0x330\n? irq_work_queue+0x39/0x50\n? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x79/0xc0\n? mem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\nmem_allocator_disconnect+0x73/0x150\n? __pfx_mem_allocator_disconnect+0x10/0x10\n? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0\n? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0\npage_pool_release+0x36e/0x6d0\npage_pool_destroy+0xd7/0x440\nxdp_unreg_mem_model+0x1a7/0x2a0\n? __pfx_xdp_unreg_mem_model+0x10/0x10\n? kfree+0x125/0x370\n? bnxt_free_ring.isra.0+0x2eb/0x500\n? bnxt_free_mem+0x5ac/0x2500\nxdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x4a/0xd0\nbnxt_free_mem+0x1356/0x2500\nbnxt_close_nic+0xf0/0x3b0\n? __pfx_bnxt_close_nic+0x10/0x10\n? ethnl_parse_bit+0x2c6/0x6d0\n? __pfx___nla_validate_parse+0x10/0x10\n? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bit+0x10/0x10\nbnxt_set_features+0x2a8/0x3e0\n__netdev_update_features+0x4dc/0x1370\n? ethnl_parse_bitset+0x4ff/0x750\n? __pfx_ethnl_parse_bitset+0x10/0x10\n? __pfx___netdev_update_features+0x10/0x10\n? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xf0\n? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x70\n? __pm_runtime_resume+0x7d/0x110\nethnl_set_features+0x32d/0xa20\r\n\r\nTo fix this problem, it uses rhashtable_lookup_fast() instead of\nrhashtable_lookup() with rcu_read_lock().\nUsing xa without rcu_read_lock() here is safe.\nxa is freed by __xdp_mem_allocator_rcu_free() and this is called by\ncall_rcu() of mem_xa_remove().\nThe mem_xa_remove() is called by page_pool_destroy() if a reference\ncount reaches 0.\nThe xa is already protected by the reference count mechanism well in the\ncontrol plane.\nSo removing rcu_read_lock() for page_pool_destroy() is safe.(CVE-2024-43834)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG\r\n\r\nWhen BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is set, the trampoline calls\n__bpf_tramp_enter() and __bpf_tramp_exit() functions, passing them\nthe struct bpf_tramp_image *im pointer as an argument in R0.\r\n\r\nThe trampoline generation code uses emit_addr_mov_i64() to emit\ninstructions for moving the bpf_tramp_image address into R0, but\nemit_addr_mov_i64() assumes the address to be in the vmalloc() space\nand uses only 48 bits. Because bpf_tramp_image is allocated using\nkzalloc(), its address can use more than 48-bits, in this case the\ntrampoline will pass an invalid address to __bpf_tramp_enter/exit()\ncausing a kernel crash.\r\n\r\nFix this by using emit_a64_mov_i64() in place of emit_addr_mov_i64()\nas it can work with addresses that are greater than 48-bits.(CVE-2024-43840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nremoteproc: imx_rproc: Skip over memory region when node value is NULL\r\n\r\nIn imx_rproc_addr_init() \u0026quot;nph = of_count_phandle_with_args()\u0026quot; just counts\nnumber of phandles. But phandles may be empty. So of_parse_phandle() in\nthe parsing loop (0 \u0026lt; a \u0026lt; nph) may return NULL which is later dereferenced.\nAdjust this issue by adding NULL-return check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[Fixed title to fit within the prescribed 70-75 charcters](CVE-2024-43860)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmemcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr\r\n\r\nCommit 73f576c04b94 (\u0026quot;mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after\nmany small jobs\u0026quot;) decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the\ncgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID\nspace. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for\nmodifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace()\nhappen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex\nfrom concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr\nwas not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for\ndifferent memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that.\r\n\r\nWe have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in\nour fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of\nlist_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting\ncode. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry\nand inode), the super_block\u0026apos;s list_lru didn\u0026apos;t have list_lru_one for the\nmemcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is\nnot allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow\nmemcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but\nreturned success. No evidence were found for these cases.\r\n\r\nLooking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg\u0026apos;s id\nis not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs\nhave same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most\nreasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race\nbetween multiple idr_remove() calls or race between\nidr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing\nmultiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them\nwould cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from\nother memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one.(CVE-2024-43892)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: core: check uartclk for zero to avoid divide by zero\r\n\r\nCalling ioctl TIOCSSERIAL with an invalid baud_base can\nresult in uartclk being zero, which will result in a\ndivide by zero error in uart_get_divisor(). The check for\nuartclk being zero in uart_set_info() needs to be done\nbefore other settings are made as subsequent calls to\nioctl TIOCSSERIAL for the same port would be impacted if\nthe uartclk check was done where uartclk gets set.\r\n\r\nOops: divide error: 0000 PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nRIP: 0010:uart_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:580)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\nserial8250_get_divisor (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2576\n drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2589)\nserial8250_do_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:502\n drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2741)\nserial8250_set_termios (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:2862)\nuart_change_line_settings (./include/linux/spinlock.h:376\n ./include/linux/serial_core.h:608 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:222)\nuart_port_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:342)\nuart_startup (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:368)\nuart_set_info (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1034)\nuart_set_info_user (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:1059)\ntty_set_serial (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2637)\ntty_ioctl (drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2647 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2791)\n__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:907\n fs/ioctl.c:893 fs/ioctl.c:893)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1))\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\nRule: add(CVE-2024-43893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/client: fix null pointer dereference in drm_client_modeset_probe\r\n\r\nIn drm_client_modeset_probe(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to modeset-\u0026gt;mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer\ndereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-43894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()\r\n\r\nUserspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio\ndescriptor array.\nUsers can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range.\nOffset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get\nthe gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using\narray_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative\ninformation leaks.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndriver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race\r\n\r\nuevent_show() wants to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver-\u0026gt;name. There is no clean\nway for a device attribute to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver unless that\nattribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the\nanti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks\ndeadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding\nthe lock.\r\n\r\nThis deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()\nis marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a\nlocal lockdep key for @dev-\u0026gt;mutex to reveal reports of the form:\r\n\r\n ======================================================\n WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N\n ------------------------------------------------------\n modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8c2270070de0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\r\n\r\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8c22016e88f8 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210\r\n\r\n which lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\n the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30\n uevent_show+0xac/0x130\n dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40\n sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0\n seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450\n vfs_read+0x25b/0x340\n ksys_read+0x67/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0\n lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0\n kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200\n __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\n kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0\n device_del+0x168/0x410\n device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110\n device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70\n device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210\n driver_detach+0x47/0x90\n bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0\n cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]\n __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\nThe observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer\nlived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless\nde-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a\ndevice. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use\nsynchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential\nraces. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to\nhandle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.\r\n\r\nThanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok\r\n\r\nWe must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: flowtable: initialise extack before use\r\n\r\nFix missing initialisation of extack in flow offload.(CVE-2024-45018)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check\r\n\r\nIn case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this\ncombination successfully passes the check\n\u0026apos;if (!im_protocols \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !tm_protocols)\u0026apos; in the nfc_start_poll().\nBut then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll()\npoll mod list will remain empty and dev-\u0026gt;poll_mod_count will remain 0\nwhich lead to division by zero.\r\n\r\nNormally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is\nnot expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from\nuserspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a\nbroken or malicious program may pass a message containing a \u0026quot;bad\u0026quot;\ncombination of protocol parameter values so that dev-\u0026gt;poll_mod_count\nis not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading\nto division by zero.\nCall trace looks like:\nnfc_genl_start_poll()\n nfc_start_poll()\n -\u0026gt;start_poll()\n pn533_start_poll()\r\n\r\nAdd poll mod list filling check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-46676)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: cmd-db: Map shared memory as WC, not WB\r\n\r\nLinux does not write into cmd-db region. This region of memory is write\nprotected by XPU. XPU may sometime falsely detect clean cache eviction\nas \u0026quot;write\u0026quot; into the write protected region leading to secure interrupt\nwhich causes an endless loop somewhere in Trust Zone.\r\n\r\nThe only reason it is working right now is because Qualcomm Hypervisor\nmaps the same region as Non-Cacheable memory in Stage 2 translation\ntables. The issue manifests if we want to use another hypervisor (like\nXen or KVM), which does not know anything about those specific mappings.\r\n\r\nChanging the mapping of cmd-db memory from MEMREMAP_WB to MEMREMAP_WT/WC\nremoves dependency on correct mappings in Stage 2 tables. This patch\nfixes the issue by updating the mapping to MEMREMAP_WC.\r\n\r\nI tested this on SA8155P with Xen.(CVE-2024-46689)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: typec: ucsi: Move unregister out of atomic section\r\n\r\nCommit \u0026apos;9329933699b3 (\u0026quot;soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Make client-lock\nnon-sleeping\u0026quot;)\u0026apos; moved the pmic_glink client list under a spinlock, as it\nis accessed by the rpmsg/glink callback, which in turn is invoked from\nIRQ context.\r\n\r\nThis means that ucsi_unregister() is now called from atomic context,\nwhich isn\u0026apos;t feasible as it\u0026apos;s expecting a sleepable context. An effort is\nunder way to get GLINK to invoke its callbacks in a sleepable context,\nbut until then lets schedule the unregistration.\r\n\r\nA side effect of this is that ucsi_unregister() can now happen\nafter the remote processor, and thereby the communication link with it, is\ngone. pmic_glink_send() is amended with a check to avoid the resulting NULL\npointer dereference.\nThis does however result in the user being informed about this error by\nthe following entry in the kernel log:\r\n\r\n ucsi_glink.pmic_glink_ucsi pmic_glink.ucsi.0: failed to send UCSI write request: -5(CVE-2024-46691)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/vmwgfx: Fix prime with external buffers\r\n\r\nMake sure that for external buffers mapping goes through the dma_buf\ninterface instead of trying to access pages directly.\r\n\r\nExternal buffers might not provide direct access to readable/writable\npages so to make sure the bo\u0026apos;s created from external dma_bufs can be\nread dma_buf interface has to be used.\r\n\r\nFixes crashes in IGT\u0026apos;s kms_prime with vgem. Regular desktop usage won\u0026apos;t\ntrigger this due to the fact that virtual machines will not have\nmultiple GPUs but it enables better test coverage in IGT.(CVE-2024-46709)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nRemove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role\nof msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with\nlist_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the path:\n msgdma_free_chan_resources -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptors -\u0026gt;\n msgdma_free_desc_list -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nwhich does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not\nremoved from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow\r\n\r\n[WHY \u0026amp; HOW]\nMake sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will\nnever overflow and exceess array size.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46726)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.\r\n\r\nThe syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked\nvia bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf()\nfirst.\r\n\r\nMartin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL\nprobably didn\u0026apos;t work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a\n(\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF\u0026quot;). The reason is that the\nper-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self\ntest case but each BPF function expects it.\r\n\r\nRemove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.(CVE-2024-46754)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: unset the binding mark of a reused connection\r\n\r\nSteve French reported null pointer dereference error from sha256 lib.\ncifs.ko can send session setup requests on reused connection.\nIf reused connection is used for binding session, conn-\u0026gt;binding can\nstill remain true and generate_preauth_hash() will not set\nsess-\u0026gt;Preauth_HashValue and it will be NULL.\nIt is used as a material to create an encryption key in\nksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey. -\u0026gt;Preauth_HashValue cause null pointer\ndereference error from crypto_shash_update().\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\n#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nCPU: 8 PID: 429254 Comm: kworker/8:39\nHardware name: LENOVO 20MAS08500/20MAS08500, BIOS N2CET69W (1.52 )\nWorkqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd]\nRIP: 0010:lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3]\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n? show_regs+0x6d/0x80\n? __die+0x24/0x80\n? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0\n? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ee/0x6b0\n? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0\n? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n? lib_sha256_base_do_update.isra.0+0x11e/0x1d0 [sha256_ssse3]\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n? __pfx_sha256_transform_rorx+0x10/0x10 [sha256_ssse3]\n_sha256_update+0x77/0xa0 [sha256_ssse3]\nsha256_avx2_update+0x15/0x30 [sha256_ssse3]\ncrypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40\nhmac_update+0x12/0x20\ncrypto_shash_update+0x1e/0x40\ngenerate_key+0x234/0x380 [ksmbd]\ngenerate_smb3encryptionkey+0x40/0x1c0 [ksmbd]\nksmbd_gen_smb311_encryptionkey+0x72/0xa0 [ksmbd]\nntlm_authenticate.isra.0+0x423/0x5d0 [ksmbd]\nsmb2_sess_setup+0x952/0xaa0 [ksmbd]\n__process_request+0xa3/0x1d0 [ksmbd]\n__handle_ksmbd_work+0x1c4/0x2f0 [ksmbd]\nhandle_ksmbd_work+0x2d/0xa0 [ksmbd]\nprocess_one_work+0x16c/0x350\nworker_thread+0x306/0x440\n? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\nkthread+0xef/0x120\n? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\nret_from_fork+0x44/0x70\n? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\nret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n\u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-46795)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: fix the waring dereferencing hive\r\n\r\nCheck the amdgpu_hive_info *hive that maybe is NULL.(CVE-2024-46805)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/bridge: tc358767: Check if fully initialized before signalling HPD event via IRQ\r\n\r\nMake sure the connector is fully initialized before signalling any\nHPD events via drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(), otherwise this may\nlead to NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-46810)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm\ninitialize.\r\n\r\n[How]\nReturn failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: the warning dereferencing obj for nbio_v7_4\r\n\r\nif ras_manager obj null, don\u0026apos;t print NBIO err data(CVE-2024-46819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read\r\n\r\nAvoid using the negative values\nfor clk_idex as an index into an array pptable-\u0026gt;DpmDescriptor.\r\n\r\nV2: fix clk_index return check (Tim Huang)(CVE-2024-46821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry\r\n\r\nIn a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where\na check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was\nnoted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index\ninto a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.\r\n\r\nIf an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible\nfor the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would\nthen cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger\nthis has not been established, harden this caller against the\npossibility.(CVE-2024-46822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read\r\n\r\nELF loader uses \u0026quot;randomize_va_space\u0026quot; twice. It is sysctl and can change\nat any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with\nunpredictable consequences.\r\n\r\nIssue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: x86: Acquire kvm-\u0026gt;srcu when handling KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS\r\n\r\nGrab kvm-\u0026gt;srcu when processing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, as KVM will forcibly\nleave nested VMX/SVM if SMM mode is being toggled, and leaving nested VMX\nreads guest memory.\r\n\r\nNote, kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() can also be called from KVM_RUN\nvia sync_regs(), which already holds SRCU. I.e. trying to precisely use\nkvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock() around the problematic SMM code would cause\nproblems. Acquiring SRCU isn\u0026apos;t all that expensive, so for simplicity,\ngrab it unconditionally for KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS.\r\n\r\n =============================\n WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552 Not tainted\n -----------------------------\n include/linux/kvm_host.h:1027 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!\r\n\r\n other info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n 1 lock held by repro/1071:\n #0: ffff88811e424430 (\u0026amp;vcpu-\u0026gt;mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]\r\n\r\n stack backtrace:\n CPU: 15 PID: 1071 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-332d2c1d713e-next-vm #552\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x13f/0x1a0\n kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x168/0x190 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm]\n nested_vmx_load_msr+0x6b/0x1d0 [kvm_intel]\n load_vmcs12_host_state+0x432/0xb40 [kvm_intel]\n vmx_leave_nested+0x30/0x40 [kvm_intel]\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events+0x15d/0x2b0 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x1107/0x1750 [kvm]\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7d/0x970 [kvm]\n ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm]\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x497/0x970 [kvm]\n ? lock_acquire+0xba/0x2d0\n ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x40c/0x6f0\n ? lock_release+0xb7/0x270\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0\n do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n RIP: 0033:0x7ff11eb1b539\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-46830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc\r\n\r\nWe should verify the bound of the array to assure that host\nmay not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.\r\n\r\nFound by static analysis.(CVE-2024-46836)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nuserfaultfd: don\u0026apos;t BUG_ON() if khugepaged yanks our page table\r\n\r\nSince khugepaged was changed to allow retracting page tables in file\nmappings without holding the mmap lock, these BUG_ON()s are wrong - get\nrid of them.\r\n\r\nWe could also remove the preceding \u0026quot;if (unlikely(...))\u0026quot; block, but then we\ncould reach pte_offset_map_lock() with transhuge pages not just for file\nmappings but also for anonymous mappings - which would probably be fine\nbut I think is not necessarily expected.(CVE-2024-46838)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete\r\n\r\nIn reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren\u0026apos;t\nholding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient\nincorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which\ncould happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return\n-EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,\nhowever we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.\nFinally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert\nthat to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can\nactually do something with the information.(CVE-2024-46840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN\r\n\r\nWhen sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer\nfollowing the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to\nETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be\nreproduced by running\r\n\r\n\t$ ping -s 11 destination(CVE-2024-46854)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nft_socket: fix sk refcount leaks\r\n\r\nWe must put \u0026apos;sk\u0026apos; reference before returning.(CVE-2024-46855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync\r\n\r\nThere are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race\ncondition:\r\n\r\n CPU1\t\t\t\tCPU2\n ==== ====\n net_rx_action\n napi_poll netlink_sendmsg\n __napi_poll netlink_unicast\n process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel\n __netif_receive_skb genl_rcv\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb\n NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg\n ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit\n tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit\n tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list\n tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows\n tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr\n mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer\n mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)\r\n\r\nIn remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical\nzone protected by \u0026quot;pm.lock\u0026quot;, the entry will be released, which leads to the\noccurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).\r\n\r\nKeeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling\nsk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of \u0026quot;entry-\u0026gt;add_timer\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nMove list_del(\u0026amp;entry-\u0026gt;list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock,\ndo not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which\ncan avoid similar \u0026quot;entry-\u0026gt;x\u0026quot; uaf.(CVE-2024-46858)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses\r\n\r\nThe panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index\nvalues of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array\nis big enough.\r\n\r\nNot all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example\nthe Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only\nsupports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.\r\n\r\nCheck that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC\nbrightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.\r\n\r\nFor higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array\ndoes not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store()\naccessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe()\nand resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: stm32/cryp - call finalize with bh disabled\r\n\r\nThe finalize operation in interrupt mode produce a produces a spinlock\nrecursion warning. The reason is the fact that BH must be disabled\nduring this process.(CVE-2024-47658)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Error out instead on BUG_ON() in IBI DMA setup\r\n\r\nDefinitely condition dma_get_cache_alignment * defined value \u0026gt; 256\nduring driver initialization is not reason to BUG_ON(). Turn that to\ngraceful error out with -EINVAL.(CVE-2024-47665)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix state management in error path of log writing function\r\n\r\nAfter commit a694291a6211 (\u0026quot;nilfs2: separate wait function from\nnilfs_segctor_write\u0026quot;) was applied, the log writing function\nnilfs_segctor_do_construct() was able to issue I/O requests continuously\neven if user data blocks were split into multiple logs across segments,\nbut two potential flaws were introduced in its error handling.\r\n\r\nFirst, if nilfs_segctor_begin_construction() fails while creating the\nsecond or subsequent logs, the log writing function returns without\ncalling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction(), so the writeback flag set on\npages/folios will remain uncleared. This causes page cache operations to\nhang waiting for the writeback flag. For example,\ntruncate_inode_pages_final(), which is called via nilfs_evict_inode() when\nan inode is evicted from memory, will hang.\r\n\r\nSecond, the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag set on normal inodes remain uncleared. \nAs a result, if the next log write involves checkpoint creation, that\u0026apos;s\nfine, but if a partial log write is performed that does not, inodes with\nNILFS_I_COLLECTED set are erroneously removed from the \u0026quot;sc_dirty_files\u0026quot;\nlist, and their data and b-tree blocks may not be written to the device,\ncorrupting the block mapping.\r\n\r\nFix these issues by uniformly calling nilfs_segctor_abort_construction()\non failure of each step in the loop in nilfs_segctor_do_construct(),\nhaving it clean up logs and segment usages according to progress, and\ncorrecting the conditions for calling nilfs_redirty_inodes() to ensure\nthat the NILFS_I_COLLECTED flag is cleared.(CVE-2024-47669)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak\r\n\r\nThe syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write,\nwe need to clear the structure before filling fields.(CVE-2024-47671)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don\u0026apos;t wait for tx queues if firmware is dead\r\n\r\nThere is a WARNING in iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() (that was\nrecently converted from just a message), that can be hit if we\nwait for TX queues to become empty after firmware died. Clearly,\nwe can\u0026apos;t expect anything from the firmware after it\u0026apos;s declared dead.\r\n\r\nDon\u0026apos;t call iwl_trans_wait_tx_queues_empty() in this case. While it could\nbe a good idea to stop the flow earlier, the flush functions do some\nmaintenance work that is not related to the firmware, so keep that part\nof the code running even when the firmware is not running.\r\n\r\n[edit commit message](CVE-2024-47672)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix use-after-free in bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() goes to the error_free label and frees the array of bpf_uprobe\u0026apos;s without calling bpf_uprobe_unregister(). This leaks bpf_uprobe-\u0026gt;uprobe and worse, this frees bpf_uprobe-\u0026gt;consumer without removing it from the uprobe-\u0026gt;consumers list.(CVE-2024-47675)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/perf: Fix ali_drw_pmu driver interrupt status clearing The alibaba_uncore_pmu driver forgot to clear all interrupt status in the interrupt processing function. After the PMU counter overflow interrupt occurred, an interrupt storm occurred, causing the system to hang. Therefore, clear the correct interrupt status in the interrupt handling function to fix it.(CVE-2024-47731)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file\u0026apos;s private_data pointer into a local variable named \u0026apos;private\u0026apos;, which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file-\u0026gt;private_data into its local variable \u0026apos;private\u0026apos;, which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there\u0026apos;s also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode\u0026apos;s spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it\u0026apos;s used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future.(CVE-2024-47741)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2296",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:46Z",
"published": "2024-10-25T11:07:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2296"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36963"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42280"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42283"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42286"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42287"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42290"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42295"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42299"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42305"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42306"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42308"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42309"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42311"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43834"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43860"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46691"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46709"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46795"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46805"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46810"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46838"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46854"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47665"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47671"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47675"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47731"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47741"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2023-52889",
"CVE-2024-27397",
"CVE-2024-36012",
"CVE-2024-36015",
"CVE-2024-36032",
"CVE-2024-36244",
"CVE-2024-36880",
"CVE-2024-36889",
"CVE-2024-36894",
"CVE-2024-36909",
"CVE-2024-36910",
"CVE-2024-36911",
"CVE-2024-36913",
"CVE-2024-36915",
"CVE-2024-36918",
"CVE-2024-36920",
"CVE-2024-36921",
"CVE-2024-36922",
"CVE-2024-36927",
"CVE-2024-36936",
"CVE-2024-36940",
"CVE-2024-36941",
"CVE-2024-36946",
"CVE-2024-36963",
"CVE-2024-36971",
"CVE-2024-38594",
"CVE-2024-38608",
"CVE-2024-38612",
"CVE-2024-40999",
"CVE-2024-42104",
"CVE-2024-42128",
"CVE-2024-42157",
"CVE-2024-42229",
"CVE-2024-42232",
"CVE-2024-42236",
"CVE-2024-42280",
"CVE-2024-42283",
"CVE-2024-42286",
"CVE-2024-42287",
"CVE-2024-42289",
"CVE-2024-42290",
"CVE-2024-42292",
"CVE-2024-42295",
"CVE-2024-42299",
"CVE-2024-42305",
"CVE-2024-42306",
"CVE-2024-42308",
"CVE-2024-42309",
"CVE-2024-42311",
"CVE-2024-42313",
"CVE-2024-42322",
"CVE-2024-43823",
"CVE-2024-43828",
"CVE-2024-43830",
"CVE-2024-43831",
"CVE-2024-43834",
"CVE-2024-43840",
"CVE-2024-43860",
"CVE-2024-43892",
"CVE-2024-43893",
"CVE-2024-43894",
"CVE-2024-44931",
"CVE-2024-44952",
"CVE-2024-44990",
"CVE-2024-45018",
"CVE-2024-46676",
"CVE-2024-46689",
"CVE-2024-46691",
"CVE-2024-46709",
"CVE-2024-46716",
"CVE-2024-46726",
"CVE-2024-46754",
"CVE-2024-46795",
"CVE-2024-46805",
"CVE-2024-46810",
"CVE-2024-46817",
"CVE-2024-46819",
"CVE-2024-46821",
"CVE-2024-46822",
"CVE-2024-46826",
"CVE-2024-46830",
"CVE-2024-46836",
"CVE-2024-46838",
"CVE-2024-46840",
"CVE-2024-46854",
"CVE-2024-46855",
"CVE-2024-46858",
"CVE-2024-46859",
"CVE-2024-47658",
"CVE-2024-47665",
"CVE-2024-47669",
"CVE-2024-47671",
"CVE-2024-47672",
"CVE-2024-47675",
"CVE-2024-47731",
"CVE-2024-47741"
]
}
SUSE-SU-2024:3189-1
Vulnerability from csaf_suse - Published: 2024-09-10 08:45 - Updated: 2024-09-10 08:45SUSE-SU-2024:3190-1
Vulnerability from csaf_suse - Published: 2024-09-10 08:46 - Updated: 2024-09-10 08:46Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.