Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-38659 (GCVE-0-2024-38659)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-06-21 10:28 – Updated: 2026-08-05 11:33| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < 2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600
(git)
Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d (git) Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < 3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227 (git) Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < 25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7 (git) Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < 7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5 (git) Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c (git) Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31 (git) Affected: f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 , < e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.35
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.35 (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.316 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.278 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.219 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.161 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.93 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.33 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.9.4 , ≤ 6.9.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Siemens | RUGGEDCOM RST2428P |
Affected:
0 , < V3.1
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family |
Affected:
0 , < V3.1
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-21T13:26:27.611937Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-21T13:26:37.555Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:55.964Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:55:14.627Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\n\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The only entry point is a locally crafted RTM_SETLINK rtnetlink message carrying IFLA_PORT_SELF/IFLA_VF_PORTS attributes; no remote peer data reaches enic_set_vf_port.\nAC:L - A single crafted netlink message with a short IFLA_PORT_PROFILE (1 byte) or zero-length IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID deterministically triggers the fixed-size memcpy over-read every time \u2014 no race, no timing window, and no memory layout the attacker must guess.\nPR:L - RTM_SETLINK requires only CAP_NET_ADMIN in the user namespace owning the netns holding the enic netdev, which a container or userns-confined principal holding a delegated enic SR-IOV VF possesses without any host privilege; reading the leaked bytes back via RTM_GETLINK requires no privileges at all.\nUI:N - The attacker sends the malformed set request and then reads back the port profile entirely on their own; no victim action is involved.\nS:U - The out-of-bounds accesses and the disclosure stay inside the kernel\u0027s own memory and security authority; no hypervisor, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - Up to 40 bytes plus two 16-byte reads of adjacent kernel memory \u2014 uninitialized recycled heap slack and skb_shared_info fields containing kernel pointers \u2014 are copied into the port profile and returned verbatim to unprivileged userspace by enic_get_vf_port() via RTM_GETLINK, and the unterminated name additionally makes strlen() walk unbounded past the kmalloc\u0027d enic-\u003epp object into neighbouring slab data that is packed into the provisioning payload.\nI:L - There is no out-of-bounds write, but attacker-uninfluenced kernel heap bytes are committed into the driver\u0027s persistent port-profile state and shipped to the adapter firmware as a VIC provisioning TLV whose length comes from the unterminated strlen(), modifying fabric port-profile provisioning with data of a size and content the interface never permits.\nA:H - The strlen() over-read runs off the end of the small kmalloc\u0027d enic-\u003epp object, producing a KASAN slab-out-of-bounds report (panic under panic_on_warn) and, with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC or page poisoning, a page fault/oops when it crosses into unmapped memory \u2014 repeatable at will by the same actor."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:33:18.969Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
}
],
"title": "enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-38659",
"datePublished": "2024-06-21T10:28:15.337Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-21T10:12:11.472Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:33:18.969Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-38659",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00245",
"percentile": "0.15987"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1BF99E52-091D-4D39-8639-6E3471FEBD3A",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FDBF235-DA18-49A1-8690-6C7272FD0701",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9063AF3-D593-43B7-810D-58B87F82F9F9",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "31130639-53FE-4726-8986-434EE2528CB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EEFB78EE-F990-4197-BF1C-156760A55667",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "991B9791-966A-4D18-9E8D-A8AB128E5627",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.10:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2EBB4392-5FA6-4DA9-9772-8F9C750109FA",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\n\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: enic: Validar la longitud de los atributos nl en enic_set_vf_port enic_set_vf_port supone que el atributo nl IFLA_PORT_PROFILE tiene una longitud PORT_PROFILE_MAX y que los atributos nl IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID tienen una longitud PORT_UUID_MAX. Estos atributos se validan (en la funci\u00f3n do_setlink en rtnetlink.c) usando nla_policy ifla_port_policy. La pol\u00edtica define IFLA_PORT_PROFILE como NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID como NLA_BINARY e IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID como NLA_STRING. Eso significa que la validaci\u00f3n de longitud que utiliza la pol\u00edtica es para el tama\u00f1o m\u00e1ximo de los atributos y no para el tama\u00f1o exacto, por lo que la longitud de estos atributos puede ser menor que los tama\u00f1os que espera enic_set_vf_port. Esto podr\u00eda causar un acceso de lectura fuera de banda en los memcpys de los datos de estos atributos en enic_set_vf_port."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:18:54.600",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.5,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-21T13:26:27.611937Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-21T11:15:12.480",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-1284"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-13T08:27:50+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-38659",
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"initial_release_date": "2024-06-21T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "14",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "184",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-38659.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:55.964Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-21T13:26:27.611937Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-21T13:26:32.928Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\n\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:15:56.715Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
}
],
"title": "enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-38659",
"datePublished": "2024-06-21T10:28:15.337Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-21T10:12:11.472Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:55.964Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-08-23 - Updated: 2024-08-23
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2980-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242980-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2940-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242940-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2944-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242944-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2943-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242943-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2948-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242948-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2973-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242973-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242947-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-13 - Updated: 2024-09-13
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7005-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7008-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7008-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-6999-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7006-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7006-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7004-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7004-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-20 - Updated: 2024-09-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7022-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7022-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7009-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7019-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7019-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7005-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-2"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-27 - Updated: 2024-09-27
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7039-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7039-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-6999-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7009-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7029-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7029-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7028-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7028-1"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-38659
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-06-21 11:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 11:187.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.10 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449",
"status": "affected",
"version": "f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1BF99E52-091D-4D39-8639-6E3471FEBD3A",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FDBF235-DA18-49A1-8690-6C7272FD0701",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9063AF3-D593-43B7-810D-58B87F82F9F9",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "31130639-53FE-4726-8986-434EE2528CB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EEFB78EE-F990-4197-BF1C-156760A55667",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "991B9791-966A-4D18-9E8D-A8AB128E5627",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.10:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2EBB4392-5FA6-4DA9-9772-8F9C750109FA",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\n\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: enic: Validar la longitud de los atributos nl en enic_set_vf_port enic_set_vf_port supone que el atributo nl IFLA_PORT_PROFILE tiene una longitud PORT_PROFILE_MAX y que los atributos nl IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID tienen una longitud PORT_UUID_MAX. Estos atributos se validan (en la funci\u00f3n do_setlink en rtnetlink.c) usando nla_policy ifla_port_policy. La pol\u00edtica define IFLA_PORT_PROFILE como NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID como NLA_BINARY e IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID como NLA_STRING. Eso significa que la validaci\u00f3n de longitud que utiliza la pol\u00edtica es para el tama\u00f1o m\u00e1ximo de los atributos y no para el tama\u00f1o exacto, por lo que la longitud de estos atributos puede ser menor que los tama\u00f1os que espera enic_set_vf_port. Esto podr\u00eda causar un acceso de lectura fuera de banda en los memcpys de los datos de estos atributos en enic_set_vf_port."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:18:54.600",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.5,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38659",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-21T13:26:27.611937Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-21T11:15:12.480",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-1284"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-5H94-MXHC-FGXW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-21 12:31 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port
enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX. These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c) using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands read access in the memcpys of the data of these attributes in enic_set_vf_port.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38659"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1284"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-21T11:15:12Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\n\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port.",
"id": "GHSA-5h94-mxhc-fgxw",
"modified": "2026-05-12T12:31:57Z",
"published": "2024-06-21T12:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-24-102-01
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2024-04-09 00:00 - Updated: 2026-05-14 06:00ICSA-25-226-15
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00OESA-2024-1835 (CVE-2021-47270)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-07-12 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: fix various gadgets null ptr deref on 10gbps cabling.
This avoids a null pointer dereference in f_{ecm,eem,hid,loopback,printer,rndis,serial,sourcesink,subset,tcm} by simply reusing the 5gbps config for 10gbps.(CVE-2021-47270)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
seg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block
When an IPv4 packet is received, the ip_rcv_core(...) sets the receiving interface index into the IPv4 socket control block (v5.16-rc4, net/ipv4/ip_input.c line 510):
IPCB(skb)->iif = skb->skb_iif;
If that IPv4 packet is meant to be encapsulated in an outer IPv6+SRH header, the seg6_do_srh_encap(...) performs the required encapsulation. In this case, the seg6_do_srh_encap function clears the IPv6 socket control block (v5.16-rc4 net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c line 163):
memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
The memset(...) was introduced in commit ef489749aae5 ("ipv6: sr: clear IP6CB(skb) on SRH ip4ip6 encapsulation") a long time ago (2019-01-29).
Since the IPv6 socket control block and the IPv4 socket control block share the same memory area (skb->cb), the receiving interface index info is lost (IP6CB(skb)->iif is set to zero).
As a side effect, that condition triggers a NULL pointer dereference if commit 0857d6f8c759 ("ipv6: When forwarding count rx stats on the orig netdev") is applied.
To fix that issue, we set the IP6CB(skb)->iif with the index of the receiving interface once again.(CVE-2021-47515)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mxl111sf: change mutex_init() location
Syzbot reported, that mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() uses uninitialized mutex. The problem was in wrong mutex_init() location.
Previous mutex_init(&state->msg_lock) call was in ->init() function, but dvb_usbv2_init() has this order of calls:
dvb_usbv2_init()
dvb_usbv2_adapter_init()
dvb_usbv2_adapter_frontend_init()
props->frontend_attach()
props->init()
Since mxl111sf_ devices call mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() in ->frontend_attach() internally we need to initialize state->msg_lock before frontend_attach(). To achieve it, ->probe() call added to all mxl111sf_ devices, which will simply initiaize mutex.(CVE-2021-47583)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mac80211: validate extended element ID is present
Before attempting to parse an extended element, verify that the extended element ID is present.(CVE-2021-47611)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: Fix queues reservation for XDP
When XDP was configured on a system with large number of CPUs and X722 NIC there was a call trace with NULL pointer dereference.
i40e 0000:87:00.0: failed to get tracking for 256 queues for VSI 0 err -12 i40e 0000:87:00.0: setup of MAIN VSI failed
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 RIP: 0010:i40e_xdp+0xea/0x1b0 [i40e] Call Trace: ? i40e_reconfig_rss_queues+0x130/0x130 [i40e] dev_xdp_install+0x61/0xe0 dev_xdp_attach+0x18a/0x4c0 dev_change_xdp_fd+0x1e6/0x220 do_setlink+0x616/0x1030 ? ahci_port_stop+0x80/0x80 ? ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0 ? lock_timer_base+0x61/0x80 ? __mod_timer+0x202/0x380 rtnl_setlink+0xe5/0x170 ? bpf_lsm_binder_transaction+0x10/0x10 ? security_capable+0x36/0x50 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x121/0x350 ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x100/0x100 netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0xf0 netlink_unicast+0x1d3/0x2a0 netlink_sendmsg+0x22a/0x440 sock_sendmsg+0x5e/0x60 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160 ? __sys_getsockname+0x7e/0xc0 ? _copy_from_user+0x3c/0x80 ? __sys_setsockopt+0xc8/0x1a0 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f83fa7a39e0
This was caused by PF queue pile fragmentation due to flow director VSI queue being placed right after main VSI. Because of this main VSI was not able to resize its queue allocation for XDP resulting in no queues allocated for main VSI when XDP was turned on.
Fix this by always allocating last queue in PF queue pile for a flow director VSI.(CVE-2021-47619)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: max9759: fix underflow in speaker_gain_control_put()
Check for negative values of "priv->gain" to prevent an out of bounds access. The concern is that these might come from the user via: -> snd_ctl_elem_write_user() -> snd_ctl_elem_write() -> kctl->put()(CVE-2022-48717)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ieee802154: ca8210: Stop leaking skb's
Upon error the ieee802154_xmit_complete() helper is not called. Only ieee802154_wake_queue() is called manually. We then leak the skb structure.
Free the skb structure upon error before returning.(CVE-2022-48722)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2022-48736)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw()
We don't currently validate that the values being set are within the range we advertised to userspace as being valid, do so and reject any values that are out of range.(CVE-2022-48738)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow
There will be BUG_ON() triggered in include/linux/skbuff.h leading to intermittent kernel panic, when the skb length underflow is detected.
Fix this by dropping the packet if such length underflows are seen because of inconsistencies in the hardware descriptors.(CVE-2022-48743)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid intentionally writing across neighboring fields.
Use flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they are always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves that can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.
We were doing:
#define ETH_HLEN 14
#define VLAN_HLEN 4
...
#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)
...
struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);
...
struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = &wqe->eth;
struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe->data;
...
memcpy(eseg->inline_hdr.start, xdptxd->data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);
target is wqe->eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being 2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start (really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into wqe->data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr (8 bytes).
struct mlx5e_tx_wqe { struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; / 0 16 / struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; / 16 16 / struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; / 32 0 /
/* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
};
struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg { u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; / 0 1 / u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; / 1 1 / u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; / 2 1 / u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; / 3 1 / u8 cs_flags; / 4 1 / u8 swp_flags; / 5 1 / __be16 mss; / 6 2 / __be32 flow_table_metadata; / 8 4 / union { struct { __be16 sz; / 12 2 / u8 start[2]; / 14 2 / } inline_hdr; / 12 4 / struct { __be16 type; / 12 2 / __be16 vlan_tci; / 14 2 / } insert; / 12 4 / __be32 trailer; / 12 4 / }; / 12 4 /
/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg { __be32 byte_count; / 0 4 / __be32 lkey; / 4 4 / __be64 addr; / 8 8 /
/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
So, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer sizes.
"pahole" shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe nor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. "objdump -d" shows no meaningful object code changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and optimizations).(CVE-2022-48744)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: bnx2fc: Flush destroy_work queue before calling bnx2fc_interface_put()
The bnx2fc_destroy() functions are removing the interface before calling destroy_work. This results multiple WARNings from sysfs_remove_group() as the controller rport device attributes are removed too early.
Replace the fcoe_port's destroy_work queue. It's not needed.
The problem is easily reproducible with the following steps.
Example:
$ dmesg -w & $ systemctl enable --now fcoe $ fipvlan -s -c ens2f1 $ fcoeadm -d ens2f1.802 [ 583.464488] host2: libfc: Link down on port (7500a1) [ 583.472651] bnx2fc: 7500a1 - rport not created Yet!! [ 583.490468] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 583.538725] sysfs group 'power' not found for kobject 'rport-2:0-0' [ 583.568814] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 192 at fs/sysfs/group.c:279 sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80 [ 583.607130] Modules linked in: dm_service_time 8021q garp mrp stp llc bnx2fc cnic uio rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 ... [ 583.942994] CPU: 3 PID: 192 Comm: kworker/3:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-39.el9.x86_64 #1 [ 583.984105] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL120 G7, BIOS J01 07/01/2013 [ 584.016535] Workqueue: fc_wq_2 fc_rport_final_delete [scsi_transport_fc] [ 584.050691] RIP: 0010:sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80 [ 584.074725] Code: ff 5b 48 89 ef 5d 41 5c e9 ee c0 ff ff 48 89 ef e8 f6 b8 ff ff eb d1 49 8b 14 24 48 8b 33 48 c7 c7 ... [ 584.162586] RSP: 0018:ffffb567c15afdc0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 584.188225] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8eec4220 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 584.221053] RDX: ffff8c1586ce84c0 RSI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0 RDI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0 [ 584.255089] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb567c15afc00 [ 584.287954] R10: ffffb567c15afbf8 R11: ffffffff8fbe7f28 R12: ffff8c1486326400 [ 584.322356] R13: ffff8c1486326480 R14: ffff8c1483a4a000 R15: 0000000000000004 [ 584.355379] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c1586cc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 584.394419] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 584.421123] CR2: 00007fe95a6f7840 CR3: 0000000107674002 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 584.454888] Call Trace: [ 584.466108] device_del+0xb2/0x3e0 [ 584.481701] device_unregister+0x13/0x60 [ 584.501306] bsg_unregister_queue+0x5b/0x80 [ 584.522029] bsg_remove_queue+0x1c/0x40 [ 584.541884] fc_rport_final_delete+0xf3/0x1d0 [scsi_transport_fc] [ 584.573823] process_one_work+0x1e3/0x3b0 [ 584.592396] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 584.609256] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370 [ 584.628877] kthread+0x149/0x170 [ 584.643673] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 584.662909] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 584.680002] ---[ end trace 53575ecefa942ece ]---(CVE-2022-48758)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def
The driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.
The following log reveals it:
[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414 [ 29.612820] Call Trace: [ 29.613030] <TASK> [ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7 [ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190 [ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0 [ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60 [ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310 [ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: sdio: fix possible resource leaks in some error paths
If sdio_add_func() or sdio_init_func() fails, sdio_remove_func() can not release the resources, because the sdio function is not presented in these two cases, it won't call of_node_put() or put_device().
To fix these leaks, make sdio_func_present() only control whether device_del() needs to be called or not, then always call of_node_put() and put_device().
In error case in sdio_init_func(), the reference of 'card->dev' is not get, to avoid redundant put in sdio_free_func_cis(), move the get_device() to sdio_alloc_func() and put_device() to sdio_release_func(), it can keep the get/put function be balanced.
Without this patch, while doing fault inject test, it can get the following leak reports, after this fix, the leak is gone.
unreferenced object 0xffff888112514000 (size 2048): comm "kworker/3:2", pid 65, jiffies 4294741614 (age 124.774s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 e0 6f 12 81 88 ff ff 60 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff ..o.....`X...... 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff .@Q......@Q..... backtrace: [<000000009e5931da>] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110 [<000000002f839ccb>] mmc_alloc_card+0x38/0xb0 [mmc_core] [<0000000004adcbf6>] mmc_sdio_init_card+0xde/0x170 [mmc_core] [<000000007538fea0>] mmc_attach_sdio+0xcb/0x1b0 [mmc_core] [<00000000d4fdeba7>] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 [mmc_core]
unreferenced object 0xffff888112511000 (size 2048): comm "kworker/3:2", pid 65, jiffies 4294741623 (age 124.766s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff e0 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff .@Q......X...... 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff ..Q.......Q..... backtrace: [<000000009e5931da>] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110 [<00000000fcbe706c>] sdio_alloc_func+0x35/0x100 [mmc_core] [<00000000c68f4b50>] mmc_attach_sdio.cold.18+0xb1/0x395 [mmc_core] [<00000000d4fdeba7>] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 mmc_core
In the Linux kernel through 6.7.1, there is a use-after-free in cec_queue_msg_fh, related to drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c and drivers/media/cec/core/cec-api.c.(CVE-2024-23848)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline
The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the original CPU.
When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU, but the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately reclaimed. Instead, apicd->move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming process is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.
Upon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU, irq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU's vector_cleanup list if it remains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its vector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.
However, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the interrupt triggers again on the new CPU.
In that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU to reclaim the old apicd->prev_vector because the interrupt isn't currently affine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even though __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it doesn't reclaim apicd->prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both apicd->move_in_progress and apicd->prev_vector to 0.
As a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a CPU vector leak.
To address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move() before the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd->prev_vector, if the interrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.
Additionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well, following a warning message, although theoretically it should never see apicd->move_in_progress with apicd->prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: act_skbmod: prevent kernel-infoleak
syzbot found that tcf_skbmod_dump() was copying four bytes from kernel stack to user space [1].
The issue here is that 'struct tc_skbmod' has a four bytes hole.
We need to clear the structure before filling fields.
[1] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline] simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline] __skb_datagram_iter+0x185/0x1000 net/core/datagram.c:420 skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5c/0x200 net/core/datagram.c:546 skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4050 [inline] netlink_recvmsg+0x432/0x1610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1962 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068 __sys_recvfrom+0x35a/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2242 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2256 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x126/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2256 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was stored to memory at: pskb_expand_head+0x30f/0x19d0 net/core/skbuff.c:2253 netlink_trim+0x2c2/0x330 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317 netlink_unicast+0x9f/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1351 nlmsg_unicast include/net/netlink.h:1144 [inline] nlmsg_notify+0x21d/0x2f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2610 rtnetlink_send+0x73/0x90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:741 rtnetlink_maybe_send include/linux/rtnetlink.h:17 [inline] tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2048 [inline] tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x146e/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2559 rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6613 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf4c/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10df/0x11f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was stored to memory at: __nla_put lib/nlattr.c:1041 [inline] nla_put+0x1c6/0x230 lib/nlattr.c:1099 tcf_skbmod_dump+0x23f/0xc20 net/sched/act_skbmod.c:256 tcf_action_dump_old net/sched/act_api.c:1191 [inline] tcf_action_dump_1+0x85e/0x970 net/sched/act_api.c:1227 tcf_action_dump+0x1fd/0x460 net/sched/act_api.c:1251 tca_get_fill+0x519/0x7a0 net/sched/act_api.c:1628 tcf_add_notify_msg net/sched/act_api.c:2023 [inline] tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2042 [inline] tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x1365/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netli ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1][2]:
nci_rx_work() parses and processes received packet. When the payload length is zero, each message type handler reads uninitialized payload and KMSAN detects this issue. The receipt of a packet with a zero-size payload is considered unexpected, and therefore, such packets should be silently discarded.
This patch resolved this issue by checking payload size before calling each message type handler codes.(CVE-2024-35915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/arm/malidp: fix a possible null pointer dereference
In malidp_mw_connector_reset, new memory is allocated with kzalloc, but no check is performed. In order to prevent null pointer dereferencing, ensure that mw_state is checked before calling __drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset.(CVE-2024-36014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
amd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted
If there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first device will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes on all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will start reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been evicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page fault.(CVE-2024-36949)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in dctcp_update_alpha().
In dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g as follows:
alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha >> dctcp_shift_g); ... delivered_ce <<= (10 - dctcp_shift_g);
It seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered shift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g:
memcpy((void)0x20000080, "/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\000", 47); res = syscall(__NR_openat, /fd=/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /file=/0x20000080ul, /flags=/2ul, /mode=/0ul); memcpy((void)0x20000000, "100\000", 4); syscall(__NR_write, /fd=/r[0], /val=/0x20000000ul, /len=/4ul);
Let's limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax().
With this patch:
# echo 10 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g 10 # echo 11 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[0]: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12 shift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') CPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468 dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143 tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline] tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline] __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983 release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549 mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907 mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976 __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072 mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127 inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878 do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c. RSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0 R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 </TASK>(CVE-2024-37356)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference
In vc4_hdmi_audio_init() of_get_address() may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38546)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks
There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the commit ac0a230f719b ("eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks"). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the .ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver, so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device
There is a reference count leak issue of the object "net_device" in ax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one or zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause memory leak.
In order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of net_device after dev->ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qedf: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a count-sized kernel buffer and copy count from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use kstrtouint on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using kstrtouint. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38559)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet
The 'TAG 66 Packet Format' description is missing the cipher code and checksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result, the buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and write_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the buffer.
Fix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet will always fit in the buffer.
This fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70 print_report+0xc5/0x610 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 kasan_report+0xc2/0x110 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 __asan_store1+0x62/0x80 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10 ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540 ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d] ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10 ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67 Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67 RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040 </TASK>
Allocated by task 181: kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x66/0x160 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8(CVE-2024-38578)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic
In spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len instead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the buffer boundaries. Fix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()
Syzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called during nilfs2 unmount.
Analysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which synchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after nilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace below:
nilfs_detach_log_writer nilfs_segctor_destroy nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --> Shut down log writer thread flush_work nilfs_iput_work_func nilfs_dispose_list iput nilfs_evict_inode nilfs_transaction_commit nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync) nilfs_segctor_sync --> Attempt to synchronize with log writer thread *** DEADLOCK ***
Fix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer thread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by forcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread terminates.
The skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the subsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread
Patch series "nilfs2: fix log writer related issues".
This bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues, including a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on unmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found during their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.
This patch (of 3):
A use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on the nilfs_sc_info structure.
The problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log writer thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure is about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread's lifetime.
Fix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer thread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time
Currently ALSA timer doesn't have the lower limit of the start tick time, and it allows a very small size, e.g. 1 tick with 1ns resolution for hrtimer. Such a situation may lead to an unexpected RCU stall, where the callback repeatedly queuing the expire update, as reported by fuzzer.
This patch introduces a sanity check of the timer start tick time, so that the system returns an error when a too small start size is set. As of this patch, the lower limit is hard-coded to 100us, which is small enough but can still work somehow.(CVE-2024-38618)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal
The removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal of the driver. However, code doesn't update the respective global variable and after insmod — rmmod — insmod cycle the kernel oopses:
max3100 spi-PRP0001:01: max3100_probe: adding port 0 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000408 ... RIP: 0010:serial_core_register_port+0xa0/0x840 ... max3100_probe+0x1b6/0x280 [max3100] spi_probe+0x8d/0xb0
Update the actual state so next time UART driver will be registered again.
Hugo also noticed, that the error path in the probe also affected by having the variable set, and not cleared. Instead of clearing it move the assignment after the successfull uart_register_driver() call.(CVE-2024-38633)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Lock port->lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()
uart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken, Since we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at the time of running. Make sure that it's taken by explicitly doing that. Without it we got a splat:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100] RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100] max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 max3100
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode
If channel for the given node is not found we return null from get_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer before using it in two of the missing places.
This was originally reported in [0]: Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port
enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX. These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c) using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands read access in the memcpys of the data of these attributes in enic_set_vf_port.(CVE-2024-38659)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-buf/sw-sync: don't enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()
Since commit a6aa8fca4d79 ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from known context") by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with spin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite sync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains inconsistent lock state warning.
Use plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for sync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()
Syzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline] new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391 slaballoc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525 slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852 p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline] p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641 p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
If p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req->rc.tag will not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res() ends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc() finishes.
Fix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields such as 'tag' and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) 'id' during the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: fix various gadgets null ptr deref on 10gbps cabling.\r\n\r\nThis avoids a null pointer dereference in\nf_{ecm,eem,hid,loopback,printer,rndis,serial,sourcesink,subset,tcm}\nby simply reusing the 5gbps config for 10gbps.(CVE-2021-47270)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nseg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block\r\n\r\nWhen an IPv4 packet is received, the ip_rcv_core(...) sets the receiving\ninterface index into the IPv4 socket control block (v5.16-rc4,\nnet/ipv4/ip_input.c line 510):\r\n\r\n IPCB(skb)-\u0026gt;iif = skb-\u0026gt;skb_iif;\r\n\r\nIf that IPv4 packet is meant to be encapsulated in an outer IPv6+SRH\nheader, the seg6_do_srh_encap(...) performs the required encapsulation.\nIn this case, the seg6_do_srh_encap function clears the IPv6 socket control\nblock (v5.16-rc4 net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c line 163):\r\n\r\n memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));\r\n\r\nThe memset(...) was introduced in commit ef489749aae5 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: clear\nIP6CB(skb) on SRH ip4ip6 encapsulation\u0026quot;) a long time ago (2019-01-29).\r\n\r\nSince the IPv6 socket control block and the IPv4 socket control block share\nthe same memory area (skb-\u0026gt;cb), the receiving interface index info is lost\n(IP6CB(skb)-\u0026gt;iif is set to zero).\r\n\r\nAs a side effect, that condition triggers a NULL pointer dereference if\ncommit 0857d6f8c759 (\u0026quot;ipv6: When forwarding count rx stats on the orig\nnetdev\u0026quot;) is applied.\r\n\r\nTo fix that issue, we set the IP6CB(skb)-\u0026gt;iif with the index of the\nreceiving interface once again.(CVE-2021-47515)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mxl111sf: change mutex_init() location\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported, that mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() uses uninitialized\nmutex. The problem was in wrong mutex_init() location.\r\n\r\nPrevious mutex_init(\u0026amp;state-\u0026gt;msg_lock) call was in -\u0026gt;init() function, but\ndvb_usbv2_init() has this order of calls:\r\n\r\n\tdvb_usbv2_init()\n\t dvb_usbv2_adapter_init()\n\t dvb_usbv2_adapter_frontend_init()\n\t props-\u0026gt;frontend_attach()\r\n\r\n\t props-\u0026gt;init()\r\n\r\nSince mxl111sf_* devices call mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() in -\u0026gt;frontend_attach()\ninternally we need to initialize state-\u0026gt;msg_lock before\nfrontend_attach(). To achieve it, -\u0026gt;probe() call added to all mxl111sf_*\ndevices, which will simply initiaize mutex.(CVE-2021-47583)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmac80211: validate extended element ID is present\r\n\r\nBefore attempting to parse an extended element, verify that\nthe extended element ID is present.(CVE-2021-47611)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni40e: Fix queues reservation for XDP\r\n\r\nWhen XDP was configured on a system with large number of CPUs\nand X722 NIC there was a call trace with NULL pointer dereference.\r\n\r\ni40e 0000:87:00.0: failed to get tracking for 256 queues for VSI 0 err -12\ni40e 0000:87:00.0: setup of MAIN VSI failed\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nRIP: 0010:i40e_xdp+0xea/0x1b0 [i40e]\nCall Trace:\n? i40e_reconfig_rss_queues+0x130/0x130 [i40e]\ndev_xdp_install+0x61/0xe0\ndev_xdp_attach+0x18a/0x4c0\ndev_change_xdp_fd+0x1e6/0x220\ndo_setlink+0x616/0x1030\n? ahci_port_stop+0x80/0x80\n? ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0\n? lock_timer_base+0x61/0x80\n? __mod_timer+0x202/0x380\nrtnl_setlink+0xe5/0x170\n? bpf_lsm_binder_transaction+0x10/0x10\n? security_capable+0x36/0x50\nrtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x121/0x350\n? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x100/0x100\nnetlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0xf0\nnetlink_unicast+0x1d3/0x2a0\nnetlink_sendmsg+0x22a/0x440\nsock_sendmsg+0x5e/0x60\n__sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160\n? __sys_getsockname+0x7e/0xc0\n? _copy_from_user+0x3c/0x80\n? __sys_setsockopt+0xc8/0x1a0\n__x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30\ndo_syscall_64+0x33/0x40\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\nRIP: 0033:0x7f83fa7a39e0\r\n\r\nThis was caused by PF queue pile fragmentation due to\nflow director VSI queue being placed right after main VSI.\nBecause of this main VSI was not able to resize its\nqueue allocation for XDP resulting in no queues allocated\nfor main VSI when XDP was turned on.\r\n\r\nFix this by always allocating last queue in PF queue pile\nfor a flow director VSI.(CVE-2021-47619)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: max9759: fix underflow in speaker_gain_control_put()\r\n\r\nCheck for negative values of \u0026quot;priv-\u0026gt;gain\u0026quot; to prevent an out of bounds\naccess. The concern is that these might come from the user via:\n -\u0026gt; snd_ctl_elem_write_user()\n -\u0026gt; snd_ctl_elem_write()\n -\u0026gt; kctl-\u0026gt;put()(CVE-2022-48717)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ieee802154: ca8210: Stop leaking skb\u0026apos;s\r\n\r\nUpon error the ieee802154_xmit_complete() helper is not called. Only\nieee802154_wake_queue() is called manually. We then leak the skb\nstructure.\r\n\r\nFree the skb structure upon error before returning.(CVE-2022-48722)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2022-48736)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw()\r\n\r\nWe don\u0026apos;t currently validate that the values being set are within the range\nwe advertised to userspace as being valid, do so and reject any values\nthat are out of range.(CVE-2022-48738)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow\r\n\r\nThere will be BUG_ON() triggered in include/linux/skbuff.h leading to\nintermittent kernel panic, when the skb length underflow is detected.\r\n\r\nFix this by dropping the packet if such length underflows are seen\nbecause of inconsistencies in the hardware descriptors.(CVE-2022-48743)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()\r\n\r\nIn preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time\nfield bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid\nintentionally writing across neighboring fields.\r\n\r\nUse flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they\nare always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves\nthat can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.\r\n\r\nWe were doing:\r\n\r\n\t#define ETH_HLEN 14\n\t#define VLAN_HLEN 4\n\t...\n\t#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)\n\t...\n struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);\n\t...\n struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = \u0026amp;wqe-\u0026gt;eth;\n struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe-\u0026gt;data;\n\t...\n\tmemcpy(eseg-\u0026gt;inline_hdr.start, xdptxd-\u0026gt;data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);\r\n\r\ntarget is wqe-\u0026gt;eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being\n2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start\n(really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into\nwqe-\u0026gt;data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr\n(8 bytes).\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5e_tx_wqe {\n struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; /* 0 16 */\n struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; /* 16 16 */\n struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; /* 32 0 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */\n /* last cacheline: 32 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg {\n u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; /* 0 1 */\n u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; /* 1 1 */\n u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; /* 2 1 */\n u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; /* 3 1 */\n u8 cs_flags; /* 4 1 */\n u8 swp_flags; /* 5 1 */\n __be16 mss; /* 6 2 */\n __be32 flow_table_metadata; /* 8 4 */\n union {\n struct {\n __be16 sz; /* 12 2 */\n u8 start[2]; /* 14 2 */\n } inline_hdr; /* 12 4 */\n struct {\n __be16 type; /* 12 2 */\n __be16 vlan_tci; /* 14 2 */\n } insert; /* 12 4 */\n __be32 trailer; /* 12 4 */\n }; /* 12 4 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */\n /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5_wqe_data_seg {\n __be32 byte_count; /* 0 4 */\n __be32 lkey; /* 4 4 */\n __be64 addr; /* 8 8 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */\n /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nSo, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer\nsizes.\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;pahole\u0026quot; shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe\nnor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. \u0026quot;objdump -d\u0026quot; shows no meaningful object\ncode changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and\noptimizations).(CVE-2022-48744)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: bnx2fc: Flush destroy_work queue before calling bnx2fc_interface_put()\r\n\r\nThe bnx2fc_destroy() functions are removing the interface before calling\ndestroy_work. This results multiple WARNings from sysfs_remove_group() as\nthe controller rport device attributes are removed too early.\r\n\r\nReplace the fcoe_port\u0026apos;s destroy_work queue. It\u0026apos;s not needed.\r\n\r\nThe problem is easily reproducible with the following steps.\r\n\r\nExample:\r\n\r\n $ dmesg -w \u0026amp;\n $ systemctl enable --now fcoe\n $ fipvlan -s -c ens2f1\n $ fcoeadm -d ens2f1.802\n [ 583.464488] host2: libfc: Link down on port (7500a1)\n [ 583.472651] bnx2fc: 7500a1 - rport not created Yet!!\n [ 583.490468] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n [ 583.538725] sysfs group \u0026apos;power\u0026apos; not found for kobject \u0026apos;rport-2:0-0\u0026apos;\n [ 583.568814] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 192 at fs/sysfs/group.c:279 sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80\n [ 583.607130] Modules linked in: dm_service_time 8021q garp mrp stp llc bnx2fc cnic uio rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 ...\n [ 583.942994] CPU: 3 PID: 192 Comm: kworker/3:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-39.el9.x86_64 #1\n [ 583.984105] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL120 G7, BIOS J01 07/01/2013\n [ 584.016535] Workqueue: fc_wq_2 fc_rport_final_delete [scsi_transport_fc]\n [ 584.050691] RIP: 0010:sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80\n [ 584.074725] Code: ff 5b 48 89 ef 5d 41 5c e9 ee c0 ff ff 48 89 ef e8 f6 b8 ff ff eb d1 49 8b 14 24 48 8b 33 48 c7 c7 ...\n [ 584.162586] RSP: 0018:ffffb567c15afdc0 EFLAGS: 00010282\n [ 584.188225] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8eec4220 RCX: 0000000000000000\n [ 584.221053] RDX: ffff8c1586ce84c0 RSI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0 RDI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0\n [ 584.255089] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb567c15afc00\n [ 584.287954] R10: ffffb567c15afbf8 R11: ffffffff8fbe7f28 R12: ffff8c1486326400\n [ 584.322356] R13: ffff8c1486326480 R14: ffff8c1483a4a000 R15: 0000000000000004\n [ 584.355379] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c1586cc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [ 584.394419] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [ 584.421123] CR2: 00007fe95a6f7840 CR3: 0000000107674002 CR4: 00000000000606e0\n [ 584.454888] Call Trace:\n [ 584.466108] device_del+0xb2/0x3e0\n [ 584.481701] device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n [ 584.501306] bsg_unregister_queue+0x5b/0x80\n [ 584.522029] bsg_remove_queue+0x1c/0x40\n [ 584.541884] fc_rport_final_delete+0xf3/0x1d0 [scsi_transport_fc]\n [ 584.573823] process_one_work+0x1e3/0x3b0\n [ 584.592396] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0\n [ 584.609256] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370\n [ 584.628877] kthread+0x149/0x170\n [ 584.643673] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40\n [ 584.662909] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n [ 584.680002] ---[ end trace 53575ecefa942ece ]---(CVE-2022-48758)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def\r\n\r\nThe driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414\n[ 29.612820] Call Trace:\n[ 29.613030] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f\n[ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7\n[ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190\n[ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0\n[ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60\n[ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310\n[ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: sdio: fix possible resource leaks in some error paths\r\n\r\nIf sdio_add_func() or sdio_init_func() fails, sdio_remove_func() can\nnot release the resources, because the sdio function is not presented\nin these two cases, it won\u0026apos;t call of_node_put() or put_device().\r\n\r\nTo fix these leaks, make sdio_func_present() only control whether\ndevice_del() needs to be called or not, then always call of_node_put()\nand put_device().\r\n\r\nIn error case in sdio_init_func(), the reference of \u0026apos;card-\u0026gt;dev\u0026apos; is\nnot get, to avoid redundant put in sdio_free_func_cis(), move the\nget_device() to sdio_alloc_func() and put_device() to sdio_release_func(),\nit can keep the get/put function be balanced.\r\n\r\nWithout this patch, while doing fault inject test, it can get the\nfollowing leak reports, after this fix, the leak is gone.\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff888112514000 (size 2048):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/3:2\u0026quot;, pid 65, jiffies 4294741614 (age 124.774s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 e0 6f 12 81 88 ff ff 60 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff ..o.....`X......\n 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff .@Q......@Q.....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009e5931da\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110\n [\u0026lt;000000002f839ccb\u0026gt;] mmc_alloc_card+0x38/0xb0 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000004adcbf6\u0026gt;] mmc_sdio_init_card+0xde/0x170 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;000000007538fea0\u0026gt;] mmc_attach_sdio+0xcb/0x1b0 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000d4fdeba7\u0026gt;] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 [mmc_core]\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff888112511000 (size 2048):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/3:2\u0026quot;, pid 65, jiffies 4294741623 (age 124.766s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff e0 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff .@Q......X......\n 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff ..Q.......Q.....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009e5931da\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110\n [\u0026lt;00000000fcbe706c\u0026gt;] sdio_alloc_func+0x35/0x100 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000c68f4b50\u0026gt;] mmc_attach_sdio.cold.18+0xb1/0x395 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000d4fdeba7\u0026gt;] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 [mmc_core](CVE-2023-52730)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel through 6.7.1, there is a use-after-free in cec_queue_msg_fh, related to drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c and drivers/media/cec/core/cec-api.c.(CVE-2024-23848)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngenirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline\r\n\r\nThe absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of\ninterrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is\ndeferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the\noriginal CPU.\r\n\r\nWhen the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is\nenforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,\nbut the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately\nreclaimed. Instead, apicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming\nprocess is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nUpon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU,\nirq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU\u0026apos;s vector_cleanup list if it\nremains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its\nvector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.\r\n\r\nHowever, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the\ninterrupt triggers again on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nIn that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU\nto reclaim the old apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector because the interrupt isn\u0026apos;t currently\naffine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even\nthough __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it\ndoesn\u0026apos;t reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress and apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector to 0.\r\n\r\nAs a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a\nCPU vector leak.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move()\nbefore the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector, if the\ninterrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well,\nfollowing a warning message, although theoretically it should never see\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress with apicd-\u0026gt;prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: act_skbmod: prevent kernel-infoleak\r\n\r\nsyzbot found that tcf_skbmod_dump() was copying four bytes\nfrom kernel stack to user space [1].\r\n\r\nThe issue here is that \u0026apos;struct tc_skbmod\u0026apos; has a four bytes hole.\r\n\r\nWe need to clear the structure before filling fields.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline]\n simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline]\n __skb_datagram_iter+0x185/0x1000 net/core/datagram.c:420\n skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5c/0x200 net/core/datagram.c:546\n skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4050 [inline]\n netlink_recvmsg+0x432/0x1610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1962\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068\n __sys_recvfrom+0x35a/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2242\n __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2256 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x126/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2256\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n pskb_expand_head+0x30f/0x19d0 net/core/skbuff.c:2253\n netlink_trim+0x2c2/0x330 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317\n netlink_unicast+0x9f/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1351\n nlmsg_unicast include/net/netlink.h:1144 [inline]\n nlmsg_notify+0x21d/0x2f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2610\n rtnetlink_send+0x73/0x90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:741\n rtnetlink_maybe_send include/linux/rtnetlink.h:17 [inline]\n tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2048 [inline]\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x146e/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2559\n rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6613\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xf4c/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10df/0x11f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n __nla_put lib/nlattr.c:1041 [inline]\n nla_put+0x1c6/0x230 lib/nlattr.c:1099\n tcf_skbmod_dump+0x23f/0xc20 net/sched/act_skbmod.c:256\n tcf_action_dump_old net/sched/act_api.c:1191 [inline]\n tcf_action_dump_1+0x85e/0x970 net/sched/act_api.c:1227\n tcf_action_dump+0x1fd/0x460 net/sched/act_api.c:1251\n tca_get_fill+0x519/0x7a0 net/sched/act_api.c:1628\n tcf_add_notify_msg net/sched/act_api.c:2023 [inline]\n tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2042 [inline]\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x1365/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netli\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1][2]:\r\n\r\nnci_rx_work() parses and processes received packet. When the payload\nlength is zero, each message type handler reads uninitialized payload\nand KMSAN detects this issue. The receipt of a packet with a zero-size\npayload is considered unexpected, and therefore, such packets should be\nsilently discarded.\r\n\r\nThis patch resolved this issue by checking payload size before calling\neach message type handler codes.(CVE-2024-35915)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/arm/malidp: fix a possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn malidp_mw_connector_reset, new memory is allocated with kzalloc, but\nno check is performed. In order to prevent null pointer dereferencing,\nensure that mw_state is checked before calling\n__drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset.(CVE-2024-36014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\namd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted\r\n\r\nIf there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first\ndevice will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes\non all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will\nstart reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been\nevicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page\nfault.(CVE-2024-36949)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in dctcp_update_alpha().\r\n\r\nIn dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g\nas follows:\r\n\r\n alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha \u0026gt;\u0026gt; dctcp_shift_g);\n ...\n delivered_ce \u0026lt;\u0026lt;= (10 - dctcp_shift_g);\r\n\r\nIt seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered\nshift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g:\r\n\r\n memcpy((void*)0x20000080,\n \u0026quot;/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\\000\u0026quot;, 47);\n res = syscall(__NR_openat, /*fd=*/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /*file=*/0x20000080ul,\n /*flags=*/2ul, /*mode=*/0ul);\n memcpy((void*)0x20000000, \u0026quot;100\\000\u0026quot;, 4);\n syscall(__NR_write, /*fd=*/r[0], /*val=*/0x20000000ul, /*len=*/4ul);\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax().\r\n\r\nWith this patch:\r\n\r\n # echo 10 \u0026gt; /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n 10\n # echo 11 \u0026gt; /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument\r\n\r\n[0]:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12\nshift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type \u0026apos;u32\u0026apos; (aka \u0026apos;unsigned int\u0026apos;)\nCPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468\n dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143\n tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline]\n tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948\n tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711\n tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937\n sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline]\n __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983\n release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549\n mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907\n mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976\n __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072\n mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127\n inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437\n __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]\n sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421\n __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422\n task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]\n do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878\n do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027\n __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline]\n __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline]\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c.\nRSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0\nR10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0\nR13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-37356)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn vc4_hdmi_audio_init() of_get_address() may return\nNULL which is later dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38546)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks\r\n\r\nThere is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the\ncommit ac0a230f719b (\u0026quot;eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid\ndeadlocks\u0026quot;). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic\ncontext and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface\nof sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing\nthe implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have\nthe same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the\n.ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver,\nso fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device\r\n\r\nThere is a reference count leak issue of the object \u0026quot;net_device\u0026quot; in\nax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the\nax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one\nor zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will\ncause memory leak.\r\n\r\nIn order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of\nnet_device after dev-\u0026gt;ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qedf: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a count-sized kernel buffer and copy count from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use kstrtouint on this buffer but we\ndon\u0026apos;t ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can\nlead to OOB read when using kstrtouint. Fix this issue by using\nmemdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38559)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\r\n\r\nThe \u0026apos;TAG 66 Packet Format\u0026apos; description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\r\n\r\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\r\n\r\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8(CVE-2024-38578)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic\r\n\r\nIn spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len\ninstead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the\nbuffer boundaries.\nFix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()\r\n\r\nSyzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called\nduring nilfs2 unmount.\r\n\r\nAnalysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which\nsynchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after\nnilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace\nbelow:\r\n\r\nnilfs_detach_log_writer\n nilfs_segctor_destroy\n nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --\u0026gt; Shut down log writer thread\n flush_work\n nilfs_iput_work_func\n nilfs_dispose_list\n iput\n nilfs_evict_inode\n nilfs_transaction_commit\n nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync)\n nilfs_segctor_sync --\u0026gt; Attempt to synchronize with\n log writer thread\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\nFix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer\nthread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by\nforcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread\nterminates.\r\n\r\nThe skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the\nsubsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;nilfs2: fix log writer related issues\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nThis bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues,\nincluding a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on\nunmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found\nduring their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.\r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 3):\r\n\r\nA use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on\nthe nilfs_sc_info structure.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log\nwriter thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure\nis about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread\u0026apos;s lifetime.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer\nthread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time\r\n\r\nCurrently ALSA timer doesn\u0026apos;t have the lower limit of the start tick\ntime, and it allows a very small size, e.g. 1 tick with 1ns resolution\nfor hrtimer. Such a situation may lead to an unexpected RCU stall,\nwhere the callback repeatedly queuing the expire update, as reported\nby fuzzer.\r\n\r\nThis patch introduces a sanity check of the timer start tick time, so\nthat the system returns an error when a too small start size is set.\nAs of this patch, the lower limit is hard-coded to 100us, which is\nsmall enough but can still work somehow.(CVE-2024-38618)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal\r\n\r\nThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal of\nthe driver. However, code doesn\u0026apos;t update the respective global\nvariable and after insmod \u2014 rmmod \u2014 insmod cycle the kernel\noopses:\r\n\r\n max3100 spi-PRP0001:01: max3100_probe: adding port 0\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000408\n ...\n RIP: 0010:serial_core_register_port+0xa0/0x840\n ...\n max3100_probe+0x1b6/0x280 [max3100]\n spi_probe+0x8d/0xb0\r\n\r\nUpdate the actual state so next time UART driver will be registered\nagain.\r\n\r\nHugo also noticed, that the error path in the probe also affected\nby having the variable set, and not cleared. Instead of clearing it\nmove the assignment after the successfull uart_register_driver() call.(CVE-2024-38633)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Lock port-\u0026gt;lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()\r\n\r\nuart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken,\nSince we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at\nthe time of running. Make sure that it\u0026apos;s taken by explicitly doing\nthat. Without it we got a splat:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100]\n RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100]\n max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 [max3100](CVE-2024-38634)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode\r\n\r\nIf channel for the given node is not found we return null from\nget_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer\nbefore using it in two of the missing places.\r\n\r\nThis was originally reported in [0]:\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\r\n\r\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port.(CVE-2024-38659)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma-buf/sw-sync: don\u0026apos;t enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()\r\n\r\nSince commit a6aa8fca4d79 (\u0026quot;dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from\nknown context\u0026quot;) by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with\nspin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite\nsync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains\ninconsistent lock state warning.\r\n\r\nUse plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for\nsync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()\r\n\r\nSyzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\n p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598\n __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]\n alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline]\n allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline]\n new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391\n ___slab_alloc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525\n __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline]\n __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852\n p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline]\n p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641\n p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nIf p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req-\u0026gt;rc.tag\nwill not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res()\nends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc()\nfinishes.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields\nsuch as \u0026apos;tag\u0026apos; and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) \u0026apos;id\u0026apos;\nduring the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1835",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:18Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T11:07:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1835"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47270"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47515"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47583"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47611"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48717"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48722"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48736"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48738"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48743"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48758"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39301"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47270",
"CVE-2021-47515",
"CVE-2021-47583",
"CVE-2021-47611",
"CVE-2021-47619",
"CVE-2022-48717",
"CVE-2022-48722",
"CVE-2022-48736",
"CVE-2022-48738",
"CVE-2022-48743",
"CVE-2022-48744",
"CVE-2022-48758",
"CVE-2022-48772",
"CVE-2023-52730",
"CVE-2024-23848",
"CVE-2024-31076",
"CVE-2024-35893",
"CVE-2024-35915",
"CVE-2024-36014",
"CVE-2024-36949",
"CVE-2024-37356",
"CVE-2024-38546",
"CVE-2024-38553",
"CVE-2024-38554",
"CVE-2024-38559",
"CVE-2024-38578",
"CVE-2024-38579",
"CVE-2024-38582",
"CVE-2024-38583",
"CVE-2024-38618",
"CVE-2024-38633",
"CVE-2024-38634",
"CVE-2024-38637",
"CVE-2024-38659",
"CVE-2024-38780",
"CVE-2024-39301"
]
}
OESA-2024-2216 (CVE-2024-27436)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-10-12 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: usb-audio: Stop parsing channels bits when all channels are found.
If a usb audio device sets more bits than the amount of channels it could write outside of the map array.(CVE-2024-27436)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete
FFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue pending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the FFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a soft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks like the following:
DWC3 Gadget FFS Application
dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ... --> dwc3_stop_active_transfers() --> dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN) --> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel() --> usb_ep_free_request() --> usb_ep_dequeue()
There is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion handler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is running in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application. As the completion call frees the USB request (io_data->req) the FFS application is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can lead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.
commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently") relocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). However, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the spinlock can't be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as usb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the function driver's completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading into a deadlock.
Fix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to ffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data->req to NULL after freeing it within the ffs->eps_lock. This resolves the race condition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue attempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the ffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is done referencing it.
This fix depends on commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently")(CVE-2024-36894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: bfa: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38560)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port
enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX. These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c) using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands read access in the memcpys of the data of these attributes in enic_set_vf_port.(CVE-2024-38659)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bcache: fix variable length array abuse in btree_iter
btree_iter is used in two ways: either allocated on the stack with a fixed size MAX_BSETS, or from a mempool with a dynamic size based on the specific cache set. Previously, the struct had a fixed-length array of size MAX_BSETS which was indexed out-of-bounds for the dynamically-sized iterators, which causes UBSAN to complain.
This patch uses the same approach as in bcachefs's sort_iter and splits the iterator into a btree_iter with a flexible array member and a btree_iter_stack which embeds a btree_iter as well as a fixed-length data array.(CVE-2024-39482)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: discard write access to the directory open
may_open() does not allow a directory to be opened with the write access. However, some writing flags set by client result in adding write access on server, making ksmbd incompatible with FUSE file system. Simply, let's discard the write access when opening a directory.
list_add corruption. next is NULL. ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:26! pc : __list_add_valid+0x88/0xbc lr : __list_add_valid+0x88/0xbc Call trace: __list_add_valid+0x88/0xbc fuse_finish_open+0x11c/0x170 fuse_open_common+0x284/0x5e8 fuse_dir_open+0x14/0x24 do_dentry_open+0x2a4/0x4e0 dentry_open+0x50/0x80 smb2_open+0xbe4/0x15a4 handle_ksmbd_work+0x478/0x5ec process_one_work+0x1b4/0x448 worker_thread+0x25c/0x430 kthread+0x104/0x1d4 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20(CVE-2024-41030)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/nouveau/dispnv04: fix null pointer dereference in nv17_tv_get_ld_modes
In nv17_tv_get_ld_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-41095)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: xc2028: avoid use-after-free in load_firmware_cb()
syzkaller reported use-after-free in load_firmware_cb() 1. The reason is because the module allocated a struct tuner in tuner_probe(), and then the module initialization failed, the struct tuner was released. A worker which created during module initialization accesses this struct tuner later, it caused use-after-free.
The process is as follows:
task-6504 worker_thread tuner_probe <= alloc dvb_frontend [2] ... request_firmware_nowait <= create a worker ... tuner_remove <= free dvb_frontend ... request_firmware_work_func <= the firmware is ready load_firmware_cb <= but now the dvb_frontend has been freed
To fix the issue, check the dvd_frontend in load_firmware_cb(), if it is null, report a warning and just return.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8000d7ca2308 by task kworker/2:3/6504
Call trace:
load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0
request_firmware_work_func+0x128/0x220
process_one_work+0x770/0x1824
worker_thread+0x488/0xea0
kthread+0x300/0x430
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Allocated by task 6504:
kzalloc
tuner_probe+0xb0/0x1430
i2c_device_probe+0x92c/0xaf0
really_probe+0x678/0xcd0
driver_probe_device+0x280/0x370
__device_attach_driver+0x220/0x330
bus_for_each_drv+0x134/0x1c0
__device_attach+0x1f4/0x410
device_initial_probe+0x20/0x30
bus_probe_device+0x184/0x200
device_add+0x924/0x12c0
device_register+0x24/0x30
i2c_new_device+0x4e0/0xc44
v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board+0xbc/0x290
v4l2_i2c_new_subdev+0xc8/0x104
em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1dd0/0x3770
Freed by task 6504:
kfree+0x238/0x4e4
tuner_remove+0x144/0x1c0
i2c_device_remove+0xc8/0x290
__device_release_driver+0x314/0x5fc
device_release_driver+0x30/0x44
bus_remove_device+0x244/0x490
device_del+0x350/0x900
device_unregister+0x28/0xd0
i2c_unregister_device+0x174/0x1d0
v4l2_device_unregister+0x224/0x380
em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1d90/0x3770
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8000d7ca2000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048
The buggy address is located 776 bytes inside of
2048-byte region [ffff8000d7ca2000, ffff8000d7ca2800)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffff7fe00035f280 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8000c001f000 index:0x0
flags: 0x7ff800000000100(slab)
raw: 07ff800000000100 ffff7fe00049d880 0000000300000003 ffff8000c001f000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff8000d7ca2200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff8000d7ca2280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>ffff8000d7ca2300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
ffff8000d7ca2380: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff8000d7ca2400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================
[2] Actually, it is allocated for struct tuner, and dvb_frontend is inside.(CVE-2024-43900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/smt: Fix unbalance sched_smt_present dec/inc
I got the following warn report while doing stress test:
jump label: negative count! WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 38 at kernel/jump_label.c:263 static_key_slow_try_dec+0x9d/0xb0 Call Trace: <TASK> __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x16/0x70 sched_cpu_deactivate+0x26e/0x2a0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x3ad/0x10d0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x3f5/0x680 smpboot_thread_fn+0x56d/0x8d0 kthread+0x309/0x400 ret_from_fork+0x41/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>
Because when cpuset_cpu_inactive() fails in sched_cpu_deactivate(), the cpu offline failed, but sched_smt_present is decremented before calling sched_cpu_deactivate(), it leads to unbalanced dec/inc, so fix it by incrementing sched_smt_present in the error path.(CVE-2024-44958)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dpu: cleanup FB if dpu_format_populate_layout fails
If the dpu_format_populate_layout() fails, then FB is prepared, but not cleaned up. This ends up leaking the pin_count on the GEM object and causes a splat during DRM file closure:
msm_obj->pin_count WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 569 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:121 update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc [...] Call trace: update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc put_pages+0xac/0x100 msm_gem_free_object+0x138/0x180 drm_gem_object_free+0x1c/0x30 drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked+0x108/0x10c drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x58/0x70 idr_for_each+0x68/0xec drm_gem_release+0x28/0x40 drm_file_free+0x174/0x234 drm_release+0xb0/0x160 __fput+0xc0/0x2c8 __fput_sync+0x50/0x5c __arm64_sys_close+0x38/0x7c invoke_syscall+0x48/0x118 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x4c/0x120 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 irq event stamp: 129818 hardirqs last enabled at (129817): [<ffffa5f6d953fcc0>] console_unlock+0x118/0x124 hardirqs last disabled at (129818): [<ffffa5f6da7dcf04>] el1_dbg+0x24/0x8c softirqs last enabled at (129808): [<ffffa5f6d94afc18>] handle_softirqs+0x4c8/0x4e8 softirqs last disabled at (129785): [<ffffa5f6d94105e4>] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/600714/(CVE-2024-44982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Input: MT - limit max slots
syzbot is reporting too large allocation at input_mt_init_slots(), for num_slots is supplied from userspace using ioctl(UI_DEV_CREATE).
Since nobody knows possible max slots, this patch chose 1024.(CVE-2024-45008)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netem: fix return value if duplicate enqueue fails
There is a bug in netem_enqueue() introduced by commit 5845f706388a ("net: netem: fix skb length BUG_ON in __skb_to_sgvec") that can lead to a use-after-free.
This commit made netem_enqueue() always return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS when a packet is duplicated, which can cause the parent qdisc's q.qlen to be mistakenly incremented. When this happens qlen_notify() may be skipped on the parent during destruction, leaving a dangling pointer for some classful qdiscs like DRR.
There are two ways for the bug happen:
- If the duplicated packet is dropped by rootq->enqueue() and then the original packet is also dropped.
- If rootq->enqueue() sends the duplicated packet to a different qdisc and the original packet is dropped.
In both cases NET_XMIT_SUCCESS is returned even though no packets are enqueued at the netem qdisc.
The fix is to defer the enqueue of the duplicate packet until after the original packet has been guaranteed to return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS.(CVE-2024-45016)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: aacraid: Fix double-free on probe failure
aac_probe_one() calls hardware-specific init functions through the aac_driver_ident::init pointer, all of which eventually call down to aac_init_adapter().
If aac_init_adapter() fails after allocating memory for aac_dev::queues, it frees the memory but does not clear that member.
After the hardware-specific init function returns an error, aac_probe_one() goes down an error path that frees the memory pointed to by aac_dev::queues, resulting.in a double-free.(CVE-2024-46673)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: dwc3: st: fix probed platform device ref count on probe error path
The probe function never performs any paltform device allocation, thus error path "undo_platform_dev_alloc" is entirely bogus. It drops the reference count from the platform device being probed. If error path is triggered, this will lead to unbalanced device reference counts and premature release of device resources, thus possible use-after-free when releasing remaining devm-managed resources.(CVE-2024-46674)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ethtool: check device is present when getting link settings
A sysfs reader can race with a device reset or removal, attempting to read device state when the device is not actually present. eg:
[exception RIP: qed_get_current_link+17]
#8 [ffffb9e4f2907c48] qede_get_link_ksettings at ffffffffc07a994a [qede] #9 [ffffb9e4f2907cd8] __rh_call_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff992b01a3 #10 [ffffb9e4f2907d38] __ethtool_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff992b04e4 #11 [ffffb9e4f2907d90] duplex_show at ffffffff99260300 #12 [ffffb9e4f2907e38] dev_attr_show at ffffffff9905a01c #13 [ffffb9e4f2907e50] sysfs_kf_seq_show at ffffffff98e0145b #14 [ffffb9e4f2907e68] seq_read at ffffffff98d902e3 #15 [ffffb9e4f2907ec8] vfs_read at ffffffff98d657d1 #16 [ffffb9e4f2907f00] ksys_read at ffffffff98d65c3f #17 [ffffb9e4f2907f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff98a052fb
crash> struct net_device.state ffff9a9d21336000 state = 5,
state 5 is __LINK_STATE_START (0b1) and __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER (0b100). The device is not present, note lack of __LINK_STATE_PRESENT (0b10).
This is the same sort of panic as observed in commit 4224cfd7fb65 ("net-sysfs: add check for netdevice being present to speed_show").
There are many other callers of __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which don't have a device presence check.
Move this check into ethtool to protect all callers.(CVE-2024-46679)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pktgen: use cpus_read_lock() in pg_net_init()
I have seen the WARN_ON(smp_processor_id() != cpu) firing in pktgen_thread_worker() during tests.
We must use cpus_read_lock()/cpus_read_unlock() around the for_each_online_cpu(cpu) loop.
While we are at it use WARN_ON_ONCE() to avoid a possible syslog flood.(CVE-2024-46681)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook
Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled.
The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states:
- This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it
- is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate
- permission checks.
nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do.
Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the added benefit of causing nfsd to recall conflicting delegations on a file when a client tries to change its security label.(CVE-2024-46695)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: arm64: Make ICC_SGI_EL1 undef in the absence of a vGICv3
On a system with a GICv3, if a guest hasn't been configured with GICv3 and that the host is not capable of GICv2 emulation, a write to any of the ICC_SGI_EL1 registers is trapped to EL2.
We therefore try to emulate the SGI access, only to hit a NULL pointer as no private interrupt is allocated (no GIC, remember?).
The obvious fix is to give the guest what it deserves, in the shape of a UNDEF exception.(CVE-2024-46707)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: fix possible NULL pointer dereference
profile->parent->dents[AAFS_PROF_DIR] could be NULL only if its parent is made from __create_missing_ancestors(..) and 'ent->old' is NULL in aa_replace_profiles(..). In that case, it must return an error code and the code, -ENOENT represents its state that the path of its parent is not existed yet.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 PGD 0 P4D 0 PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 3362 Comm: apparmor_parser Not tainted 6.8.0-24-generic #24 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:aafs_create.constprop.0+0x7f/0x130 Code: 4c 63 e0 48 83 c4 18 4c 89 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 45 31 d2 c3 cc cc cc cc <4d> 8b 55 30 4d 8d ba a0 00 00 00 4c 89 55 c0 4c 89 ff e8 7a 6a ae RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b2c7c98 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000041ed RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000b2c7cd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff82baac10 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007be9f22cf740(0000) GS:ffff88817bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000134b08000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 ? __die+0x24/0x80 ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0 ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xb2/0x140 ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a5/0x2c0 ? find_vma+0x34/0x60 ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x30 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2a2/0x6b0 ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 ? aafs_create.constprop.0+0x7f/0x130 ? aafs_create.constprop.0+0x51/0x130 __aafs_profile_mkdir+0x3d6/0x480 aa_replace_profiles+0x83f/0x1270 policy_update+0xe3/0x180 profile_load+0xbc/0x150 ? rw_verify_area+0x47/0x140 vfs_write+0x100/0x480 ? __x64_sys_openat+0x55/0xa0 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x86/0x260 ksys_write+0x73/0x100 __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x7e/0x25c0 do_syscall_64+0x7f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0x80 RIP: 0033:0x7be9f211c574 Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d d5 ea 0e 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 RSP: 002b:00007ffd26f2b8c8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005d504415e200 RCX: 00007be9f211c574 RDX: 0000000000001fc1 RSI: 00005d504418bc80 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 0000000000001fc1 R08: 0000000000001fc1 R09: 0000000080000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00005d504418bc80 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffd26f2b9b0 R15: 00007ffd26f2ba30 </TASK> Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer qrtr snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_intel_sdw_acpi snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device i2c_i801 snd_timer i2c_smbus qxl snd soundcore drm_ttm_helper lpc_ich ttm joydev input_leds serio_raw mac_hid binfmt_misc msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore nfnetlink dmi_sysfs qemu_fw_cfg ip_tables x_tables autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid ahci libahci psmouse virtio_rng xhci_pci xhci_pci_renesas CR2: 0000000000000030 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:aafs_create.constprop.0+0x7f/0x130 Code: 4c 63 e0 48 83 c4 18 4c 89 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 45 31 d2 c3 cc cc cc cc <4d> 8b 55 30 4d 8d ba a0 00 00 00 4c 89 55 c0 4c 89 ff e8 7a 6a ae RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b2c7c98 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000041ed RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000b2c7cd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46721)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix out-of-bounds write warning
Check the ring type value to fix the out-of-bounds write warning(CVE-2024-46725)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow
[WHY & HOW] Make sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will never overflow and exceess array size.
This fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46726)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Assign linear_pitch_alignment even for VM
[Description] Assign linear_pitch_alignment so we don't cause a divide by 0 error in VM environments(CVE-2024-46732)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet-tcp: fix kernel crash if commands allocation fails
If the commands allocation fails in nvmet_tcp_alloc_cmds() the kernel crashes in nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work() because of a NULL pointer dereference.
nvmet: failed to install queue 0 cntlid 1 ret 6 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
Fix the bug by setting queue->nr_cmds to zero in case nvmet_tcp_alloc_cmd() fails.(CVE-2024-46737)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
VMCI: Fix use-after-free when removing resource in vmci_resource_remove()
When removing a resource from vmci_resource_table in vmci_resource_remove(), the search is performed using the resource handle by comparing context and resource fields.
It is possible though to create two resources with different types but same handle (same context and resource fields).
When trying to remove one of the resources, vmci_resource_remove() may not remove the intended one, but the object will still be freed as in the case of the datagram type in vmci_datagram_destroy_handle(). vmci_resource_table will still hold a pointer to this freed resource leading to a use-after-free vulnerability.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vmci_handle_is_equal include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h:142 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vmci_resource_remove+0x3a1/0x410 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c:147 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88801c16d800 by task syz-executor197/1592 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xa9 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x21/0x366 mm/kasan/report.c:239 __kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x132 mm/kasan/report.c:425 kasan_report+0x38/0x51 mm/kasan/report.c:442 vmci_handle_is_equal include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h:142 [inline] vmci_resource_remove+0x3a1/0x410 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c:147 vmci_qp_broker_detach+0x89a/0x11b9 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:2182 ctx_free_ctx+0x473/0xbe1 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:444 kref_put include/linux/kref.h:65 [inline] vmci_ctx_put drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:497 [inline] vmci_ctx_destroy+0x170/0x1d6 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:195 vmci_host_close+0x125/0x1ac drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:143 __fput+0x261/0xa34 fs/file_table.c:282 task_work_run+0xf0/0x194 kernel/task_work.c:164 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:189 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x184/0x189 kernel/entry/common.c:187 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x11b/0x123 kernel/entry/common.c:220 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:302 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x18/0x42 kernel/entry/common.c:313 do_syscall_64+0x41/0x85 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0
This change ensures the type is also checked when removing the resource from vmci_resource_table in vmci_resource_remove().(CVE-2024-46738)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
uio_hv_generic: Fix kernel NULL pointer dereference in hv_uio_rescind
For primary VM Bus channels, primary_channel pointer is always NULL. This pointer is valid only for the secondary channels. Also, rescind callback is meant for primary channels only.
Fix NULL pointer dereference by retrieving the device_obj from the parent for the primary channel.(CVE-2024-46739)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
binder: fix UAF caused by offsets overwrite
Binder objects are processed and copied individually into the target buffer during transactions. Any raw data in-between these objects is copied as well. However, this raw data copy lacks an out-of-bounds check. If the raw data exceeds the data section size then the copy overwrites the offsets section. This eventually triggers an error that attempts to unwind the processed objects. However, at this point the offsets used to index these objects are now corrupted.
Unwinding with corrupted offsets can result in decrements of arbitrary nodes and lead to their premature release. Other users of such nodes are left with a dangling pointer triggering a use-after-free. This issue is made evident by the following KASAN report (trimmed):
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xe4/0x19c Write of size 4 at addr ffff47fc91598f04 by task binder-util/743
CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 743 Comm: binder-util Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4 #1 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: _raw_spin_lock+0xe4/0x19c binder_free_buf+0x128/0x434 binder_thread_write+0x8a4/0x3260 binder_ioctl+0x18f0/0x258c [...]
Allocated by task 743: __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x110/0x270 binder_new_node+0x50/0x700 binder_transaction+0x413c/0x6da8 binder_thread_write+0x978/0x3260 binder_ioctl+0x18f0/0x258c [...]
Freed by task 745: kfree+0xbc/0x208 binder_thread_read+0x1c5c/0x37d4 binder_ioctl+0x16d8/0x258c [...] ==================================================================
To avoid this issue, let's check that the raw data copy is within the boundaries of the data section.(CVE-2024-46740)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
of/irq: Prevent device address out-of-bounds read in interrupt map walk
When of_irq_parse_raw() is invoked with a device address smaller than the interrupt parent node (from #address-cells property), KASAN detects the following out-of-bounds read when populating the initial match table (dyndbg="func of_irq_parse_* +p"):
OF: of_irq_parse_one: dev=/soc@0/picasso/watchdog, index=0 OF: parent=/soc@0/pci@878000000000/gpio0@17,0, intsize=2 OF: intspec=4 OF: of_irq_parse_raw: ipar=/soc@0/pci@878000000000/gpio0@17,0, size=2 OF: -> addrsize=3 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_irq_parse_raw+0x2b8/0x8d0 Read of size 4 at addr ffffff81beca5608 by task bash/764
CPU: 1 PID: 764 Comm: bash Tainted: G O 6.1.67-484c613561-nokia_sm_arm64 #1 Hardware name: Unknown Unknown Product/Unknown Product, BIOS 2023.01-12.24.03-dirty 01/01/2023 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xdc/0x130 show_stack+0x1c/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x84 print_report+0x150/0x448 kasan_report+0x98/0x140 __asan_load4+0x78/0xa0 of_irq_parse_raw+0x2b8/0x8d0 of_irq_parse_one+0x24c/0x270 parse_interrupts+0xc0/0x120 of_fwnode_add_links+0x100/0x2d0 fw_devlink_parse_fwtree+0x64/0xc0 device_add+0xb38/0xc30 of_device_add+0x64/0x90 of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xd0/0x170 of_platform_bus_create+0x244/0x600 of_platform_notify+0x1b0/0x254 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x9c/0xd0 __of_changeset_entry_notify+0x1b8/0x230 __of_changeset_apply_notify+0x54/0xe4 of_overlay_fdt_apply+0xc04/0xd94 ...
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffffff81beca5600 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128 The buggy address is located 8 bytes inside of 128-byte region [ffffff81beca5600, ffffff81beca5680)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:00000000230d3d03 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1beca4 head:00000000230d3d03 order:1 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 flags: 0x8000000000010200(slab|head|zone=2) raw: 8000000000010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffffff810000c300 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address: ffffff81beca5500: 04 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ffffff81beca5580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc >ffffff81beca5600: 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ^ ffffff81beca5680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ffffff81beca5700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ================================================================== OF: -> got it !
Prevent the out-of-bounds read by copying the device address into a buffer of sufficient size.(CVE-2024-46743)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()
One of the true positives that the cfg_access_lock lockdep effort identified is this sequence:
WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1 at drivers/pci/pci.c:4886 pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70 RIP: 0010:pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x8c/0x190 ? pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70 ? report_bug+0x1f8/0x200 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70 pci_reset_bus+0x1d8/0x270 vmd_probe+0x778/0xa10 pci_device_probe+0x95/0x120
Where pci_reset_bus() users are triggering unlocked secondary bus resets. Ironically pci_bus_reset(), several calls down from pci_reset_bus(), uses pci_bus_lock() before issuing the reset which locks everything but the bridge itself.
For the same motivation as adding:
bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); if (bridge) pci_dev_lock(bridge);
to pci_reset_function() for the "bus" and "cxl_bus" reset cases, add pci_dev_lock() for @bus->self to pci_bus_lock().
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: handle errors from btrfs_dec_ref() properly
In walk_up_proc() we BUG_ON(ret) from btrfs_dec_ref(). This is incorrect, we have proper error handling here, return the error.(CVE-2024-46753)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mwifiex: Do not return unused priv in mwifiex_get_priv_by_id()
mwifiex_get_priv_by_id() returns the priv pointer corresponding to the bss_num and bss_type, but without checking if the priv is actually currently in use. Unused priv pointers do not have a wiphy attached to them which can lead to NULL pointer dereferences further down the callstack. Fix this by returning only used priv pointers which have priv->bss_mode set to something else than NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED.
Said NULL pointer dereference happened when an Accesspoint was started with wpa_supplicant -i mlan0 with this config:
network={ ssid="somessid" mode=2 frequency=2412 key_mgmt=WPA-PSK WPA-PSK-SHA256 proto=RSN group=CCMP pairwise=CCMP psk="12345678" }
When waiting for the AP to be established, interrupting wpa_supplicant with <ctrl-c> and starting it again this happens:
| Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000140 | Mem abort info: | ESR = 0x0000000096000004 | EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits | SET = 0, FnV = 0 | EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 | FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault | Data abort info: | ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 | CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 | GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 | user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000046d96000 | [0000000000000140] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP | Modules linked in: caam_jr caamhash_desc spidev caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes mwifiex_sdio +mwifiex crct10dif_ce cdc_acm onboard_usb_hub fsl_imx8_ddr_perf imx8m_ddrc rtc_ds1307 lm75 rtc_snvs +imx_sdma caam imx8mm_thermal spi_imx error imx_cpufreq_dt fuse ip_tables x_tables ipv6 | CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-00007-g937242013fce-dirty #18 | Hardware name: somemachine (DT) | Workqueue: events sdio_irq_work | pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : mwifiex_get_cfp+0xd8/0x15c [mwifiex] | lr : mwifiex_get_cfp+0x34/0x15c [mwifiex] | sp : ffff8000818b3a70 | x29: ffff8000818b3a70 x28: ffff000006bfd8a5 x27: 0000000000000004 | x26: 000000000000002c x25: 0000000000001511 x24: 0000000002e86bc9 | x23: ffff000006bfd996 x22: 0000000000000004 x21: ffff000007bec000 | x20: 000000000000002c x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 00500072b5503510 x15: ccc283740681e517 | x14: 0201000101006d15 x13: 0000000002e8ff43 x12: 002c01000000ffb1 | x11: 0100000000000000 x10: 02e8ff43002c0100 x9 : 0000ffb100100157 | x8 : ffff000003d20000 x7 : 00000000000002f1 x6 : 00000000ffffe124 | x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000003 x3 : 0000000000000000 | x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0001000000011001 x0 : 0000000000000000 | Call trace: | mwifiex_get_cfp+0xd8/0x15c [mwifiex] | mwifiex_parse_single_response_buf+0x1d0/0x504 [mwifiex] | mwifiex_handle_event_ext_scan_report+0x19c/0x2f8 [mwifiex] | mwifiex_process_sta_event+0x298/0xf0c [mwifiex] | mwifiex_process_event+0x110/0x238 [mwifiex] | mwifiex_main_process+0x428/0xa44 [mwifiex] | mwifiex_sdio_interrupt+0x64/0x12c [mwifiex_sdio] | process_sdio_pending_irqs+0x64/0x1b8 | sdio_irq_work+0x4c/0x7c | process_one_work+0x148/0x2a0 | worker_thread+0x2fc/0x40c | kthread+0x110/0x114 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | Code: a94153f3 a8c37bfd d50323bf d65f03c0 (f940a000) | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-46755)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (w83627ehf) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large negative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user. Fix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46756)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (lm95234) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large negative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user. Fix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46758)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (adc128d818) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large negative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user. Fix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46759)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pci/hotplug/pnv_php: Fix hotplug driver crash on Powernv
The hotplug driver for powerpc (pci/hotplug/pnv_php.c) causes a kernel crash when we try to hot-unplug/disable the PCIe switch/bridge from the PHB.
The crash occurs because although the MSI data structure has been released during disable/hot-unplug path and it has been assigned with NULL, still during unregistration the code was again trying to explicitly disable the MSI which causes the NULL pointer dereference and kernel crash.
The patch fixes the check during unregistration path to prevent invoking pci_disable_msi/msix() since its data structure is already freed.(CVE-2024-46761)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: bcm: Remove proc entry when dev is unregistered.
syzkaller reported a warning in bcm_connect() below. [0]
The repro calls connect() to vxcan1, removes vxcan1, and calls connect() with ifindex == 0.
Calling connect() for a BCM socket allocates a proc entry. Then, bcm_sk(sk)->bound is set to 1 to prevent further connect().
However, removing the bound device resets bcm_sk(sk)->bound to 0 in bcm_notify().
The 2nd connect() tries to allocate a proc entry with the same name and sets NULL to bcm_sk(sk)->bcm_proc_read, leaking the original proc entry.
Since the proc entry is available only for connect()ed sockets, let's clean up the entry when the bound netdev is unregistered.
[0]: proc_dir_entry 'can-bcm/2456' already registered WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 394 at fs/proc/generic.c:376 proc_register+0x645/0x8f0 fs/proc/generic.c:375 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 394 Comm: syz-executor403 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-g852e42cc2dd4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:proc_register+0x645/0x8f0 fs/proc/generic.c:375 Code: 00 00 00 00 00 48 85 ed 0f 85 97 02 00 00 4d 85 f6 0f 85 9f 02 00 00 48 c7 c7 9b cb cf 87 48 89 de 4c 89 fa e8 1c 6f eb fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 c7 c7 98 37 99 89 e8 cb 7e 22 05 bb 00 00 00 10 48 RSP: 0018:ffa0000000cd7c30 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 9e129be1950f0200 RBX: ff1100011b51582c RCX: ff1100011857cd80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000002 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffd400000000000f R09: ff1100013e78cac0 R10: ffac800000cd7980 R11: ff1100013e12b1f0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ff1100011a99a2ec FS: 00007fbd7086f740(0000) GS:ff1100013fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000200071c0 CR3: 0000000118556004 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> proc_create_net_single+0x144/0x210 fs/proc/proc_net.c:220 bcm_connect+0x472/0x840 net/can/bcm.c:1673 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2049 [inline] __sys_connect+0x5d2/0x690 net/socket.c:2066 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2076 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2073 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x8f/0x100 net/socket.c:2073 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fbd708b0e5d Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 9f 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff8cd33f08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fbd708b0e5d RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000040 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000040 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff8cd34098 R13: 0000000000401280 R14: 0000000000406de8 R15: 00007fbd70ab9000 </TASK> remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'net/can-bcm', leaking at least '2456'(CVE-2024-46771)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udf: Avoid excessive partition lengths
Avoid mounting filesystems where the partition would overflow the 32-bits used for block number. Also refuse to mount filesystems where the partition length is so large we cannot safely index bits in a block bitmap.(CVE-2024-46777)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: protect references to superblock parameters exposed in sysfs
The superblock buffers of nilfs2 can not only be overwritten at runtime for modifications/repairs, but they are also regularly swapped, replaced during resizing, and even abandoned when degrading to one side due to backing device issues. So, accessing them requires mutual exclusion using the reader/writer semaphore "nilfs->ns_sem".
Some sysfs attribute show methods read this superblock buffer without the necessary mutual exclusion, which can cause problems with pointer dereferencing and memory access, so fix it.(CVE-2024-46780)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix missing cleanup on rollforward recovery error
In an error injection test of a routine for mount-time recovery, KASAN found a use-after-free bug.
It turned out that if data recovery was performed using partial logs created by dsync writes, but an error occurred before starting the log writer to create a recovered checkpoint, the inodes whose data had been recovered were left in the ns_dirty_files list of the nilfs object and were not freed.
Fix this issue by cleaning up inodes that have read the recovery data if the recovery routine fails midway before the log writer starts.(CVE-2024-46781)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: mcp251x: fix deadlock if an interrupt occurs during mcp251x_open
The mcp251x_hw_wake() function is called with the mpc_lock mutex held and disables the interrupt handler so that no interrupts can be processed while waking the device. If an interrupt has already occurred then waiting for the interrupt handler to complete will deadlock because it will be trying to acquire the same mutex.
CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- mcp251x_open() mutex_lock(&priv->mcp_lock) request_threaded_irq() <interrupt> mcp251x_can_ist() mutex_lock(&priv->mcp_lock) mcp251x_hw_wake() disable_irq() <-- deadlock
Use disable_irq_nosync() instead because the interrupt handler does everything while holding the mutex so it doesn't matter if it's still running.(CVE-2024-46791)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: dapm: Fix UAF for snd_soc_pcm_runtime object
When using kernel with the following extra config,
- CONFIG_KASAN=y
- CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC=y
- CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE=y
- CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y
- CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=4096
kernel detects that snd_pcm_suspend_all() access a freed 'snd_soc_pcm_runtime' object when the system is suspended, which leads to a use-after-free bug:
[ 52.047746] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in snd_pcm_suspend_all+0x1a8/0x270 [ 52.047765] Read of size 1 at addr ffff0000b9434d50 by task systemd-sleep/2330
[ 52.047785] Call trace: [ 52.047787] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3c0 [ 52.047794] show_stack+0x34/0x50 [ 52.047797] dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x8c [ 52.047802] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x74/0x2c0 [ 52.047809] kasan_report+0x210/0x230 [ 52.047815] __asan_report_load1_noabort+0x3c/0x50 [ 52.047820] snd_pcm_suspend_all+0x1a8/0x270 [ 52.047824] snd_soc_suspend+0x19c/0x4e0
The snd_pcm_sync_stop() has a NULL check on 'substream->runtime' before making any access. So we need to always set 'substream->runtime' to NULL everytime we kfree() it.(CVE-2024-46798)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add array index check for hdcp ddc access
[Why] Coverity reports OVERRUN warning. Do not check if array index valid.
[How] Check msg_id valid and valid array index.(CVE-2024-46804)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check msg_id before processing transcation
[WHY & HOW] HDCP_MESSAGE_ID_INVALID (-1) is not a valid msg_id nor is it a valid array index, and it needs checking before used.
This fixes 4 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46814)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when link nums greater than max_links
[Why] Coverity report OVERRUN warning. There are only max_links elements within dc->links. link count could up to AMDGPU_DM_MAX_DISPLAY_INDEX 31.
[How] Make sure link count less than max_links.(CVE-2024-46816)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Check gpio_id before used as array index
[WHY & HOW] GPIO_ID_UNKNOWN (-1) is not a valid value for array index and therefore should be checked in advance.
This fixes 5 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46818)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read
Avoid using the negative values for clk_idex as an index into an array pptable->DpmDescriptor.
V2: fix clk_index return check (Tim Huang)(CVE-2024-46821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rtmutex: Drop rt_mutex::wait_lock before scheduling
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock() is called with rt_mutex::wait_lock held. In the good case it returns with the lock held and in the deadlock case it emits a warning and goes into an endless scheduling loop with the lock held, which triggers the 'scheduling in atomic' warning.
Unlock rt_mutex::wait_lock in the dead lock case before issuing the warning and dropping into the schedule for ever loop.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: void array out of bound when loop tnl_num
When query reg inf of SSU, it loops tnl_num times. However, tnl_num comes from hardware and the length of array is a fixed value. To void array out of bound, make sure the loop time is not greater than the length of array(CVE-2024-46833)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: don't BUG_ON on ENOMEM from btrfs_lookup_extent_info() in walk_down_proc()
We handle errors here properly, ENOMEM isn't fatal, return the error.(CVE-2024-46841)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
um: line: always fill *error_out in setup_one_line()
The pointer isn't initialized by callers, but I have encountered cases where it's still printed; initialize it in all possible cases in setup_one_line().(CVE-2024-46844)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: meson: axg-card: fix 'use-after-free'
Buffer 'card->dai_link' is reallocated in 'meson_card_reallocate_links()', so move 'pad' pointer initialization after this function when memory is already reallocated.
Kasan bug report:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in axg_card_add_link+0x76c/0x9bc Read of size 8 at addr ffff000000e8b260 by task modprobe/356
CPU: 0 PID: 356 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G O 6.9.12-sdkernel #1 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x94/0xec show_stack+0x18/0x24 dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90 print_report+0xfc/0x5c0 kasan_report+0xb8/0xfc __asan_load8+0x9c/0xb8 axg_card_add_link+0x76c/0x9bc [snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card] meson_card_probe+0x344/0x3b8 [snd_soc_meson_card_utils] platform_probe+0x8c/0xf4 really_probe+0x110/0x39c __driver_probe_device+0xb8/0x18c driver_probe_device+0x108/0x1d8 __driver_attach+0xd0/0x25c bus_for_each_dev+0xe0/0x154 driver_attach+0x34/0x44 bus_add_driver+0x134/0x294 driver_register+0xa8/0x1e8 __platform_driver_register+0x44/0x54 axg_card_pdrv_init+0x20/0x1000 [snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card] do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x25c do_init_module+0x10c/0x334 load_module+0x24c4/0x26cc init_module_from_file+0xd4/0x128 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x1f4/0x41c invoke_syscall+0x60/0x188 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x78/0x13c do_el0_svc+0x30/0x40 el0_svc+0x38/0x78 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194(CVE-2024-46849)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Fix bridge mode operations when there are no VFs
Currently, trying to set the bridge mode attribute when numvfs=0 leads to a crash:
bridge link set dev eth2 hwmode vepa
[ 168.967392] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 [...] [ 168.969989] RIP: 0010:mlx5_add_flow_rules+0x1f/0x300 [mlx5_core] [...] [ 168.976037] Call Trace: [ 168.976188] <TASK> [ 168.978620] _mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa_locked+0x113/0x230 [mlx5_core] [ 168.979074] mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa+0x7f/0xa0 [mlx5_core] [ 168.979471] rtnl_bridge_setlink+0xe9/0x1f0 [ 168.979714] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x159/0x400 [ 168.980451] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 [ 168.980675] netlink_unicast+0x241/0x360 [ 168.980918] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f6/0x430 [ 168.981162] _syssendmsg+0x3bb/0x3f0 [ 168.982155] _sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xd0 [ 168.985036] __sys_sendmsg+0x59/0xa0 [ 168.985477] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x150 [ 168.987273] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 168.987773] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f7950f917
(esw->fdb_table.legacy.vepa_fdb is null)
The bridge mode is only relevant when there are multiple functions per port. Therefore, prevent setting and getting this setting when there are no VFs.
Note that after this change, there are no settings to change on the PF
interface using bridge link when there are no VFs, so the interface no
longer appears in the bridge link output.(CVE-2024-46857)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-231.0.0.133.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: usb-audio: Stop parsing channels bits when all channels are found.\r\n\r\nIf a usb audio device sets more bits than the amount of channels\nit could write outside of the map array.(CVE-2024-27436)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete\r\n\r\nFFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue\npending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the\nFFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a\nsoft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks\nlike the following:\r\n\r\n DWC3 Gadget FFS Application\ndwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ...\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_stop_active_transfers()\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN)\n --\u0026gt; ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel()\n --\u0026gt; usb_ep_free_request() --\u0026gt; usb_ep_dequeue()\r\n\r\nThere is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion\nhandler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is\nrunning in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application.\nAs the completion call frees the USB request (io_data-\u0026gt;req) the FFS\napplication is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can\nlead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.\r\n\r\ncommit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status consistently\u0026quot;)\nrelocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete().\nHowever, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the\nspinlock can\u0026apos;t be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as\nusb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the\nfunction driver\u0026apos;s completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading\ninto a deadlock.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to\nffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data-\u0026gt;req\nto NULL after freeing it within the ffs-\u0026gt;eps_lock. This resolves the race\ncondition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue\nattempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the\nffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is\ndone referencing it.\r\n\r\nThis fix depends on\n commit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status\n consistently\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: bfa: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don\u0026apos;t\nensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to\nOOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead\nof memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38560)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\r\n\r\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port.(CVE-2024-38659)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbcache: fix variable length array abuse in btree_iter\r\n\r\nbtree_iter is used in two ways: either allocated on the stack with a\nfixed size MAX_BSETS, or from a mempool with a dynamic size based on the\nspecific cache set. Previously, the struct had a fixed-length array of\nsize MAX_BSETS which was indexed out-of-bounds for the dynamically-sized\niterators, which causes UBSAN to complain.\r\n\r\nThis patch uses the same approach as in bcachefs\u0026apos;s sort_iter and splits\nthe iterator into a btree_iter with a flexible array member and a\nbtree_iter_stack which embeds a btree_iter as well as a fixed-length\ndata array.(CVE-2024-39482)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: discard write access to the directory open\r\n\r\nmay_open() does not allow a directory to be opened with the write access.\nHowever, some writing flags set by client result in adding write access\non server, making ksmbd incompatible with FUSE file system. Simply, let\u0026apos;s\ndiscard the write access when opening a directory.\r\n\r\nlist_add corruption. next is NULL.\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:26!\npc : __list_add_valid+0x88/0xbc\nlr : __list_add_valid+0x88/0xbc\nCall trace:\n__list_add_valid+0x88/0xbc\nfuse_finish_open+0x11c/0x170\nfuse_open_common+0x284/0x5e8\nfuse_dir_open+0x14/0x24\ndo_dentry_open+0x2a4/0x4e0\ndentry_open+0x50/0x80\nsmb2_open+0xbe4/0x15a4\nhandle_ksmbd_work+0x478/0x5ec\nprocess_one_work+0x1b4/0x448\nworker_thread+0x25c/0x430\nkthread+0x104/0x1d4\nret_from_fork+0x10/0x20(CVE-2024-41030)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/nouveau/dispnv04: fix null pointer dereference in nv17_tv_get_ld_modes\r\n\r\nIn nv17_tv_get_ld_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mode, which will lead to a possible NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2024-41095)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: xc2028: avoid use-after-free in load_firmware_cb()\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported use-after-free in load_firmware_cb() [1].\nThe reason is because the module allocated a struct tuner in tuner_probe(),\nand then the module initialization failed, the struct tuner was released.\nA worker which created during module initialization accesses this struct\ntuner later, it caused use-after-free.\r\n\r\nThe process is as follows:\r\n\r\ntask-6504 worker_thread\ntuner_probe \u0026lt;= alloc dvb_frontend [2]\n...\nrequest_firmware_nowait \u0026lt;= create a worker\n...\ntuner_remove \u0026lt;= free dvb_frontend\n...\n request_firmware_work_func \u0026lt;= the firmware is ready\n load_firmware_cb \u0026lt;= but now the dvb_frontend has been freed\r\n\r\nTo fix the issue, check the dvd_frontend in load_firmware_cb(), if it is\nnull, report a warning and just return.\r\n\r\n[1]:\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff8000d7ca2308 by task kworker/2:3/6504\r\n\r\n Call trace:\n load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0\n request_firmware_work_func+0x128/0x220\n process_one_work+0x770/0x1824\n worker_thread+0x488/0xea0\n kthread+0x300/0x430\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 6504:\n kzalloc\n tuner_probe+0xb0/0x1430\n i2c_device_probe+0x92c/0xaf0\n really_probe+0x678/0xcd0\n driver_probe_device+0x280/0x370\n __device_attach_driver+0x220/0x330\n bus_for_each_drv+0x134/0x1c0\n __device_attach+0x1f4/0x410\n device_initial_probe+0x20/0x30\n bus_probe_device+0x184/0x200\n device_add+0x924/0x12c0\n device_register+0x24/0x30\n i2c_new_device+0x4e0/0xc44\n v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board+0xbc/0x290\n v4l2_i2c_new_subdev+0xc8/0x104\n em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1dd0/0x3770\r\n\r\n Freed by task 6504:\n kfree+0x238/0x4e4\n tuner_remove+0x144/0x1c0\n i2c_device_remove+0xc8/0x290\n __device_release_driver+0x314/0x5fc\n device_release_driver+0x30/0x44\n bus_remove_device+0x244/0x490\n device_del+0x350/0x900\n device_unregister+0x28/0xd0\n i2c_unregister_device+0x174/0x1d0\n v4l2_device_unregister+0x224/0x380\n em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1d90/0x3770\r\n\r\n The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8000d7ca2000\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048\n The buggy address is located 776 bytes inside of\n 2048-byte region [ffff8000d7ca2000, ffff8000d7ca2800)\n The buggy address belongs to the page:\n page:ffff7fe00035f280 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8000c001f000 index:0x0\n flags: 0x7ff800000000100(slab)\n raw: 07ff800000000100 ffff7fe00049d880 0000000300000003 ffff8000c001f000\n raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000\n page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\r\n\r\n Memory state around the buggy address:\n ffff8000d7ca2200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ffff8000d7ca2280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n \u0026gt;ffff8000d7ca2300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ^\n ffff8000d7ca2380: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ffff8000d7ca2400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ==================================================================\r\n\r\n[2]\n Actually, it is allocated for struct tuner, and dvb_frontend is inside.(CVE-2024-43900)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsched/smt: Fix unbalance sched_smt_present dec/inc\r\n\r\nI got the following warn report while doing stress test:\r\n\r\njump label: negative count!\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 38 at kernel/jump_label.c:263 static_key_slow_try_dec+0x9d/0xb0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x16/0x70\n sched_cpu_deactivate+0x26e/0x2a0\n cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x3ad/0x10d0\n cpuhp_thread_fun+0x3f5/0x680\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x56d/0x8d0\n kthread+0x309/0x400\n ret_from_fork+0x41/0x70\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nBecause when cpuset_cpu_inactive() fails in sched_cpu_deactivate(),\nthe cpu offline failed, but sched_smt_present is decremented before\ncalling sched_cpu_deactivate(), it leads to unbalanced dec/inc, so\nfix it by incrementing sched_smt_present in the error path.(CVE-2024-44958)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/msm/dpu: cleanup FB if dpu_format_populate_layout fails\r\n\r\nIf the dpu_format_populate_layout() fails, then FB is prepared, but not\ncleaned up. This ends up leaking the pin_count on the GEM object and\ncauses a splat during DRM file closure:\r\n\r\nmsm_obj-\u0026gt;pin_count\nWARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 569 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:121 update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc\n[...]\nCall trace:\n update_lru_locked+0xc4/0xcc\n put_pages+0xac/0x100\n msm_gem_free_object+0x138/0x180\n drm_gem_object_free+0x1c/0x30\n drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked+0x108/0x10c\n drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x58/0x70\n idr_for_each+0x68/0xec\n drm_gem_release+0x28/0x40\n drm_file_free+0x174/0x234\n drm_release+0xb0/0x160\n __fput+0xc0/0x2c8\n __fput_sync+0x50/0x5c\n __arm64_sys_close+0x38/0x7c\n invoke_syscall+0x48/0x118\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0\n do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28\n el0_svc+0x4c/0x120\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c\n el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\nirq event stamp: 129818\nhardirqs last enabled at (129817): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6d953fcc0\u0026gt;] console_unlock+0x118/0x124\nhardirqs last disabled at (129818): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6da7dcf04\u0026gt;] el1_dbg+0x24/0x8c\nsoftirqs last enabled at (129808): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6d94afc18\u0026gt;] handle_softirqs+0x4c8/0x4e8\nsoftirqs last disabled at (129785): [\u0026lt;ffffa5f6d94105e4\u0026gt;] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20\r\n\r\nPatchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/600714/(CVE-2024-44982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nInput: MT - limit max slots\r\n\r\nsyzbot is reporting too large allocation at input_mt_init_slots(), for\nnum_slots is supplied from userspace using ioctl(UI_DEV_CREATE).\r\n\r\nSince nobody knows possible max slots, this patch chose 1024.(CVE-2024-45008)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetem: fix return value if duplicate enqueue fails\r\n\r\nThere is a bug in netem_enqueue() introduced by\ncommit 5845f706388a (\u0026quot;net: netem: fix skb length BUG_ON in __skb_to_sgvec\u0026quot;)\nthat can lead to a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nThis commit made netem_enqueue() always return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS\nwhen a packet is duplicated, which can cause the parent qdisc\u0026apos;s q.qlen\nto be mistakenly incremented. When this happens qlen_notify() may be\nskipped on the parent during destruction, leaving a dangling pointer\nfor some classful qdiscs like DRR.\r\n\r\nThere are two ways for the bug happen:\r\n\r\n- If the duplicated packet is dropped by rootq-\u0026gt;enqueue() and then\n the original packet is also dropped.\n- If rootq-\u0026gt;enqueue() sends the duplicated packet to a different qdisc\n and the original packet is dropped.\r\n\r\nIn both cases NET_XMIT_SUCCESS is returned even though no packets\nare enqueued at the netem qdisc.\r\n\r\nThe fix is to defer the enqueue of the duplicate packet until after\nthe original packet has been guaranteed to return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS.(CVE-2024-45016)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: aacraid: Fix double-free on probe failure\r\n\r\naac_probe_one() calls hardware-specific init functions through the\naac_driver_ident::init pointer, all of which eventually call down to\naac_init_adapter().\r\n\r\nIf aac_init_adapter() fails after allocating memory for aac_dev::queues,\nit frees the memory but does not clear that member.\r\n\r\nAfter the hardware-specific init function returns an error,\naac_probe_one() goes down an error path that frees the memory pointed to\nby aac_dev::queues, resulting.in a double-free.(CVE-2024-46673)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: dwc3: st: fix probed platform device ref count on probe error path\r\n\r\nThe probe function never performs any paltform device allocation, thus\nerror path \u0026quot;undo_platform_dev_alloc\u0026quot; is entirely bogus. It drops the\nreference count from the platform device being probed. If error path is\ntriggered, this will lead to unbalanced device reference counts and\npremature release of device resources, thus possible use-after-free when\nreleasing remaining devm-managed resources.(CVE-2024-46674)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nethtool: check device is present when getting link settings\r\n\r\nA sysfs reader can race with a device reset or removal, attempting to\nread device state when the device is not actually present. eg:\r\n\r\n [exception RIP: qed_get_current_link+17]\n #8 [ffffb9e4f2907c48] qede_get_link_ksettings at ffffffffc07a994a [qede]\n #9 [ffffb9e4f2907cd8] __rh_call_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff992b01a3\n #10 [ffffb9e4f2907d38] __ethtool_get_link_ksettings at ffffffff992b04e4\n #11 [ffffb9e4f2907d90] duplex_show at ffffffff99260300\n #12 [ffffb9e4f2907e38] dev_attr_show at ffffffff9905a01c\n #13 [ffffb9e4f2907e50] sysfs_kf_seq_show at ffffffff98e0145b\n #14 [ffffb9e4f2907e68] seq_read at ffffffff98d902e3\n #15 [ffffb9e4f2907ec8] vfs_read at ffffffff98d657d1\n #16 [ffffb9e4f2907f00] ksys_read at ffffffff98d65c3f\n #17 [ffffb9e4f2907f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff98a052fb\r\n\r\n crash\u0026gt; struct net_device.state ffff9a9d21336000\n state = 5,\r\n\r\nstate 5 is __LINK_STATE_START (0b1) and __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER (0b100).\nThe device is not present, note lack of __LINK_STATE_PRESENT (0b10).\r\n\r\nThis is the same sort of panic as observed in commit 4224cfd7fb65\n(\u0026quot;net-sysfs: add check for netdevice being present to speed_show\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nThere are many other callers of __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() which\ndon\u0026apos;t have a device presence check.\r\n\r\nMove this check into ethtool to protect all callers.(CVE-2024-46679)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npktgen: use cpus_read_lock() in pg_net_init()\r\n\r\nI have seen the WARN_ON(smp_processor_id() != cpu) firing\nin pktgen_thread_worker() during tests.\r\n\r\nWe must use cpus_read_lock()/cpus_read_unlock()\naround the for_each_online_cpu(cpu) loop.\r\n\r\nWhile we are at it use WARN_ON_ONCE() to avoid a possible syslog flood.(CVE-2024-46681)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nselinux,smack: don\u0026apos;t bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook\r\n\r\nMarek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to\nchange the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is\nexported with root squashing enabled.\r\n\r\nThe end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states:\r\n\r\n * This function requires the caller to lock the inode\u0026apos;s i_mutex before it\n * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate\n * permission checks.\r\n\r\nnfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and\nnfsd_permission(), but those don\u0026apos;t do all the same permissions checks\nthat are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do.\r\n\r\nSince nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(),\nsimplest solution appears to be to replace the call to\n__vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This\nfixes the above issue and has the added benefit of causing nfsd to\nrecall conflicting delegations on a file when a client tries to change\nits security label.(CVE-2024-46695)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: arm64: Make ICC_*SGI*_EL1 undef in the absence of a vGICv3\r\n\r\nOn a system with a GICv3, if a guest hasn\u0026apos;t been configured with\nGICv3 and that the host is not capable of GICv2 emulation,\na write to any of the ICC_*SGI*_EL1 registers is trapped to EL2.\r\n\r\nWe therefore try to emulate the SGI access, only to hit a NULL\npointer as no private interrupt is allocated (no GIC, remember?).\r\n\r\nThe obvious fix is to give the guest what it deserves, in the\nshape of a UNDEF exception.(CVE-2024-46707)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\napparmor: fix possible NULL pointer dereference\r\n\r\nprofile-\u0026gt;parent-\u0026gt;dents[AAFS_PROF_DIR] could be NULL only if its parent is made\nfrom __create_missing_ancestors(..) and \u0026apos;ent-\u0026gt;old\u0026apos; is NULL in\naa_replace_profiles(..).\nIn that case, it must return an error code and the code, -ENOENT represents\nits state that the path of its parent is not existed yet.\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nPREEMPT SMP PTI\nCPU: 4 PID: 3362 Comm: apparmor_parser Not tainted 6.8.0-24-generic #24\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:aafs_create.constprop.0+0x7f/0x130\nCode: 4c 63 e0 48 83 c4 18 4c 89 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 45 31 d2 c3 cc cc cc cc \u0026lt;4d\u0026gt; 8b 55 30 4d 8d ba a0 00 00 00 4c 89 55 c0 4c 89 ff e8 7a 6a ae\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000b2c7c98 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000041ed RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc9000b2c7cd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff82baac10\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007be9f22cf740(0000) GS:ffff88817bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000134b08000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80\n ? __die+0x24/0x80\n ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0\n ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xb2/0x140\n ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a5/0x2c0\n ? find_vma+0x34/0x60\n ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x16/0x30\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2a2/0x6b0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30\n ? aafs_create.constprop.0+0x7f/0x130\n ? aafs_create.constprop.0+0x51/0x130\n __aafs_profile_mkdir+0x3d6/0x480\n aa_replace_profiles+0x83f/0x1270\n policy_update+0xe3/0x180\n profile_load+0xbc/0x150\n ? rw_verify_area+0x47/0x140\n vfs_write+0x100/0x480\n ? __x64_sys_openat+0x55/0xa0\n ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x86/0x260\n ksys_write+0x73/0x100\n __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30\n x64_sys_call+0x7e/0x25c0\n do_syscall_64+0x7f/0x180\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0x80\nRIP: 0033:0x7be9f211c574\nCode: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d d5 ea 0e 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89\nRSP: 002b:00007ffd26f2b8c8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005d504415e200 RCX: 00007be9f211c574\nRDX: 0000000000001fc1 RSI: 00005d504418bc80 RDI: 0000000000000004\nRBP: 0000000000001fc1 R08: 0000000000001fc1 R09: 0000000080000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00005d504418bc80\nR13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffd26f2b9b0 R15: 00007ffd26f2ba30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nModules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer qrtr snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_intel_sdw_acpi snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device i2c_i801 snd_timer i2c_smbus qxl snd soundcore drm_ttm_helper lpc_ich ttm joydev input_leds serio_raw mac_hid binfmt_misc msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore nfnetlink dmi_sysfs qemu_fw_cfg ip_tables x_tables autofs4 hid_generic usbhid hid ahci libahci psmouse virtio_rng xhci_pci xhci_pci_renesas\nCR2: 0000000000000030\n---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\nRIP: 0010:aafs_create.constprop.0+0x7f/0x130\nCode: 4c 63 e0 48 83 c4 18 4c 89 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 45 31 d2 c3 cc cc cc cc \u0026lt;4d\u0026gt; 8b 55 30 4d 8d ba a0 00 00 00 4c 89 55 c0 4c 89 ff e8 7a 6a ae\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000b2c7c98 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000041ed RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc9000b2c7cd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46721)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix out-of-bounds write warning\r\n\r\nCheck the ring type value to fix the out-of-bounds\nwrite warning(CVE-2024-46725)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow\r\n\r\n[WHY \u0026amp; HOW]\nMake sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will\nnever overflow and exceess array size.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46726)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Assign linear_pitch_alignment even for VM\r\n\r\n[Description]\nAssign linear_pitch_alignment so we don\u0026apos;t cause a divide by 0\nerror in VM environments(CVE-2024-46732)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvmet-tcp: fix kernel crash if commands allocation fails\r\n\r\nIf the commands allocation fails in nvmet_tcp_alloc_cmds()\nthe kernel crashes in nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work() because of\na NULL pointer dereference.\r\n\r\n nvmet: failed to install queue 0 cntlid 1 ret 6\n Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at\n virtual address 0000000000000008\r\n\r\nFix the bug by setting queue-\u0026gt;nr_cmds to zero in case\nnvmet_tcp_alloc_cmd() fails.(CVE-2024-46737)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nVMCI: Fix use-after-free when removing resource in vmci_resource_remove()\r\n\r\nWhen removing a resource from vmci_resource_table in\nvmci_resource_remove(), the search is performed using the resource\nhandle by comparing context and resource fields.\r\n\r\nIt is possible though to create two resources with different types\nbut same handle (same context and resource fields).\r\n\r\nWhen trying to remove one of the resources, vmci_resource_remove()\nmay not remove the intended one, but the object will still be freed\nas in the case of the datagram type in vmci_datagram_destroy_handle().\nvmci_resource_table will still hold a pointer to this freed resource\nleading to a use-after-free vulnerability.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vmci_handle_is_equal include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h:142 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vmci_resource_remove+0x3a1/0x410 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c:147\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88801c16d800 by task syz-executor197/1592\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xa9 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x21/0x366 mm/kasan/report.c:239\n __kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x132 mm/kasan/report.c:425\n kasan_report+0x38/0x51 mm/kasan/report.c:442\n vmci_handle_is_equal include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h:142 [inline]\n vmci_resource_remove+0x3a1/0x410 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c:147\n vmci_qp_broker_detach+0x89a/0x11b9 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:2182\n ctx_free_ctx+0x473/0xbe1 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:444\n kref_put include/linux/kref.h:65 [inline]\n vmci_ctx_put drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:497 [inline]\n vmci_ctx_destroy+0x170/0x1d6 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:195\n vmci_host_close+0x125/0x1ac drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:143\n __fput+0x261/0xa34 fs/file_table.c:282\n task_work_run+0xf0/0x194 kernel/task_work.c:164\n tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:189 [inline]\n exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x184/0x189 kernel/entry/common.c:187\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x11b/0x123 kernel/entry/common.c:220\n __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:302 [inline]\n syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x18/0x42 kernel/entry/common.c:313\n do_syscall_64+0x41/0x85 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0\r\n\r\nThis change ensures the type is also checked when removing\nthe resource from vmci_resource_table in vmci_resource_remove().(CVE-2024-46738)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nuio_hv_generic: Fix kernel NULL pointer dereference in hv_uio_rescind\r\n\r\nFor primary VM Bus channels, primary_channel pointer is always NULL. This\npointer is valid only for the secondary channels. Also, rescind callback\nis meant for primary channels only.\r\n\r\nFix NULL pointer dereference by retrieving the device_obj from the parent\nfor the primary channel.(CVE-2024-46739)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbinder: fix UAF caused by offsets overwrite\r\n\r\nBinder objects are processed and copied individually into the target\nbuffer during transactions. Any raw data in-between these objects is\ncopied as well. However, this raw data copy lacks an out-of-bounds\ncheck. If the raw data exceeds the data section size then the copy\noverwrites the offsets section. This eventually triggers an error that\nattempts to unwind the processed objects. However, at this point the\noffsets used to index these objects are now corrupted.\r\n\r\nUnwinding with corrupted offsets can result in decrements of arbitrary\nnodes and lead to their premature release. Other users of such nodes are\nleft with a dangling pointer triggering a use-after-free. This issue is\nmade evident by the following KASAN report (trimmed):\r\n\r\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xe4/0x19c\n Write of size 4 at addr ffff47fc91598f04 by task binder-util/743\r\n\r\n CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 743 Comm: binder-util Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4 #1\n Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n Call trace:\n _raw_spin_lock+0xe4/0x19c\n binder_free_buf+0x128/0x434\n binder_thread_write+0x8a4/0x3260\n binder_ioctl+0x18f0/0x258c\n [...]\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 743:\n __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x110/0x270\n binder_new_node+0x50/0x700\n binder_transaction+0x413c/0x6da8\n binder_thread_write+0x978/0x3260\n binder_ioctl+0x18f0/0x258c\n [...]\r\n\r\n Freed by task 745:\n kfree+0xbc/0x208\n binder_thread_read+0x1c5c/0x37d4\n binder_ioctl+0x16d8/0x258c\n [...]\n ==================================================================\r\n\r\nTo avoid this issue, let\u0026apos;s check that the raw data copy is within the\nboundaries of the data section.(CVE-2024-46740)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nof/irq: Prevent device address out-of-bounds read in interrupt map walk\r\n\r\nWhen of_irq_parse_raw() is invoked with a device address smaller than\nthe interrupt parent node (from #address-cells property), KASAN detects\nthe following out-of-bounds read when populating the initial match table\n(dyndbg=\u0026quot;func of_irq_parse_* +p\u0026quot;):\r\n\r\n OF: of_irq_parse_one: dev=/soc@0/picasso/watchdog, index=0\n OF: parent=/soc@0/pci@878000000000/gpio0@17,0, intsize=2\n OF: intspec=4\n OF: of_irq_parse_raw: ipar=/soc@0/pci@878000000000/gpio0@17,0, size=2\n OF: -\u0026gt; addrsize=3\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_irq_parse_raw+0x2b8/0x8d0\n Read of size 4 at addr ffffff81beca5608 by task bash/764\r\n\r\n CPU: 1 PID: 764 Comm: bash Tainted: G O 6.1.67-484c613561-nokia_sm_arm64 #1\n Hardware name: Unknown Unknown Product/Unknown Product, BIOS 2023.01-12.24.03-dirty 01/01/2023\n Call trace:\n dump_backtrace+0xdc/0x130\n show_stack+0x1c/0x30\n dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x84\n print_report+0x150/0x448\n kasan_report+0x98/0x140\n __asan_load4+0x78/0xa0\n of_irq_parse_raw+0x2b8/0x8d0\n of_irq_parse_one+0x24c/0x270\n parse_interrupts+0xc0/0x120\n of_fwnode_add_links+0x100/0x2d0\n fw_devlink_parse_fwtree+0x64/0xc0\n device_add+0xb38/0xc30\n of_device_add+0x64/0x90\n of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xd0/0x170\n of_platform_bus_create+0x244/0x600\n of_platform_notify+0x1b0/0x254\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x9c/0xd0\n __of_changeset_entry_notify+0x1b8/0x230\n __of_changeset_apply_notify+0x54/0xe4\n of_overlay_fdt_apply+0xc04/0xd94\n ...\r\n\r\n The buggy address belongs to the object at ffffff81beca5600\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128\n The buggy address is located 8 bytes inside of\n 128-byte region [ffffff81beca5600, ffffff81beca5680)\r\n\r\n The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n page:00000000230d3d03 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1beca4\n head:00000000230d3d03 order:1 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0\n flags: 0x8000000000010200(slab|head|zone=2)\n raw: 8000000000010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffffff810000c300\n raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000\n page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\r\n\r\n Memory state around the buggy address:\n ffffff81beca5500: 04 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n ffffff81beca5580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n \u0026gt;ffffff81beca5600: 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n ^\n ffffff81beca5680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n ffffff81beca5700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n ==================================================================\n OF: -\u0026gt; got it !\r\n\r\nPrevent the out-of-bounds read by copying the device address into a\nbuffer of sufficient size.(CVE-2024-46743)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()\r\n\r\nOne of the true positives that the cfg_access_lock lockdep effort\nidentified is this sequence:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1 at drivers/pci/pci.c:4886 pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70\n RIP: 0010:pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __warn+0x8c/0x190\n ? pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70\n ? report_bug+0x1f8/0x200\n ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n ? pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset+0x5d/0x70\n pci_reset_bus+0x1d8/0x270\n vmd_probe+0x778/0xa10\n pci_device_probe+0x95/0x120\r\n\r\nWhere pci_reset_bus() users are triggering unlocked secondary bus resets.\nIronically pci_bus_reset(), several calls down from pci_reset_bus(), uses\npci_bus_lock() before issuing the reset which locks everything *but* the\nbridge itself.\r\n\r\nFor the same motivation as adding:\r\n\r\n bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);\n if (bridge)\n pci_dev_lock(bridge);\r\n\r\nto pci_reset_function() for the \u0026quot;bus\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;cxl_bus\u0026quot; reset cases, add\npci_dev_lock() for @bus-\u0026gt;self to pci_bus_lock().\r\n\r\n[bhelgaas: squash in recursive locking deadlock fix from Keith Busch:\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711193650.701834-1-kbusch@meta.com](CVE-2024-46750)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: handle errors from btrfs_dec_ref() properly\r\n\r\nIn walk_up_proc() we BUG_ON(ret) from btrfs_dec_ref(). This is\nincorrect, we have proper error handling here, return the error.(CVE-2024-46753)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mwifiex: Do not return unused priv in mwifiex_get_priv_by_id()\r\n\r\nmwifiex_get_priv_by_id() returns the priv pointer corresponding to\nthe bss_num and bss_type, but without checking if the priv is actually\ncurrently in use.\nUnused priv pointers do not have a wiphy attached to them which can\nlead to NULL pointer dereferences further down the callstack. Fix\nthis by returning only used priv pointers which have priv-\u0026gt;bss_mode\nset to something else than NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED.\r\n\r\nSaid NULL pointer dereference happened when an Accesspoint was started\nwith wpa_supplicant -i mlan0 with this config:\r\n\r\nnetwork={\n ssid=\u0026quot;somessid\u0026quot;\n mode=2\n frequency=2412\n key_mgmt=WPA-PSK WPA-PSK-SHA256\n proto=RSN\n group=CCMP\n pairwise=CCMP\n psk=\u0026quot;12345678\u0026quot;\n}\r\n\r\nWhen waiting for the AP to be established, interrupting wpa_supplicant\nwith \u0026lt;ctrl-c\u0026gt; and starting it again this happens:\r\n\r\n| Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000140\n| Mem abort info:\n| ESR = 0x0000000096000004\n| EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n| SET = 0, FnV = 0\n| EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n| FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault\n| Data abort info:\n| ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000\n| CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0\n| GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0\n| user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000046d96000\n| [0000000000000140] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000\n| Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n| Modules linked in: caam_jr caamhash_desc spidev caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes mwifiex_sdio\n+mwifiex crct10dif_ce cdc_acm onboard_usb_hub fsl_imx8_ddr_perf imx8m_ddrc rtc_ds1307 lm75 rtc_snvs\n+imx_sdma caam imx8mm_thermal spi_imx error imx_cpufreq_dt fuse ip_tables x_tables ipv6\n| CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-00007-g937242013fce-dirty #18\n| Hardware name: somemachine (DT)\n| Workqueue: events sdio_irq_work\n| pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n| pc : mwifiex_get_cfp+0xd8/0x15c [mwifiex]\n| lr : mwifiex_get_cfp+0x34/0x15c [mwifiex]\n| sp : ffff8000818b3a70\n| x29: ffff8000818b3a70 x28: ffff000006bfd8a5 x27: 0000000000000004\n| x26: 000000000000002c x25: 0000000000001511 x24: 0000000002e86bc9\n| x23: ffff000006bfd996 x22: 0000000000000004 x21: ffff000007bec000\n| x20: 000000000000002c x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000\n| x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 00500072b5503510 x15: ccc283740681e517\n| x14: 0201000101006d15 x13: 0000000002e8ff43 x12: 002c01000000ffb1\n| x11: 0100000000000000 x10: 02e8ff43002c0100 x9 : 0000ffb100100157\n| x8 : ffff000003d20000 x7 : 00000000000002f1 x6 : 00000000ffffe124\n| x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000003 x3 : 0000000000000000\n| x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0001000000011001 x0 : 0000000000000000\n| Call trace:\n| mwifiex_get_cfp+0xd8/0x15c [mwifiex]\n| mwifiex_parse_single_response_buf+0x1d0/0x504 [mwifiex]\n| mwifiex_handle_event_ext_scan_report+0x19c/0x2f8 [mwifiex]\n| mwifiex_process_sta_event+0x298/0xf0c [mwifiex]\n| mwifiex_process_event+0x110/0x238 [mwifiex]\n| mwifiex_main_process+0x428/0xa44 [mwifiex]\n| mwifiex_sdio_interrupt+0x64/0x12c [mwifiex_sdio]\n| process_sdio_pending_irqs+0x64/0x1b8\n| sdio_irq_work+0x4c/0x7c\n| process_one_work+0x148/0x2a0\n| worker_thread+0x2fc/0x40c\n| kthread+0x110/0x114\n| ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n| Code: a94153f3 a8c37bfd d50323bf d65f03c0 (f940a000)\n| ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-46755)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhwmon: (w83627ehf) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes\r\n\r\nDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large\nnegative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user.\nFix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46756)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhwmon: (lm95234) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes\r\n\r\nDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large\nnegative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user.\nFix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46758)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhwmon: (adc128d818) Fix underflows seen when writing limit attributes\r\n\r\nDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() after kstrtol() results in an underflow if a large\nnegative number such as -9223372036854775808 is provided by the user.\nFix it by reordering clamp_val() and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() operations.(CVE-2024-46759)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npci/hotplug/pnv_php: Fix hotplug driver crash on Powernv\r\n\r\nThe hotplug driver for powerpc (pci/hotplug/pnv_php.c) causes a kernel\ncrash when we try to hot-unplug/disable the PCIe switch/bridge from\nthe PHB.\r\n\r\nThe crash occurs because although the MSI data structure has been\nreleased during disable/hot-unplug path and it has been assigned\nwith NULL, still during unregistration the code was again trying to\nexplicitly disable the MSI which causes the NULL pointer dereference and\nkernel crash.\r\n\r\nThe patch fixes the check during unregistration path to prevent invoking\npci_disable_msi/msix() since its data structure is already freed.(CVE-2024-46761)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: bcm: Remove proc entry when dev is unregistered.\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported a warning in bcm_connect() below. [0]\r\n\r\nThe repro calls connect() to vxcan1, removes vxcan1, and calls\nconnect() with ifindex == 0.\r\n\r\nCalling connect() for a BCM socket allocates a proc entry.\nThen, bcm_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;bound is set to 1 to prevent further connect().\r\n\r\nHowever, removing the bound device resets bcm_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;bound to 0\nin bcm_notify().\r\n\r\nThe 2nd connect() tries to allocate a proc entry with the same\nname and sets NULL to bcm_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;bcm_proc_read, leaking the\noriginal proc entry.\r\n\r\nSince the proc entry is available only for connect()ed sockets,\nlet\u0026apos;s clean up the entry when the bound netdev is unregistered.\r\n\r\n[0]:\nproc_dir_entry \u0026apos;can-bcm/2456\u0026apos; already registered\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 394 at fs/proc/generic.c:376 proc_register+0x645/0x8f0 fs/proc/generic.c:375\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 394 Comm: syz-executor403 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-g852e42cc2dd4\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:proc_register+0x645/0x8f0 fs/proc/generic.c:375\nCode: 00 00 00 00 00 48 85 ed 0f 85 97 02 00 00 4d 85 f6 0f 85 9f 02 00 00 48 c7 c7 9b cb cf 87 48 89 de 4c 89 fa e8 1c 6f eb fe 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 48 c7 c7 98 37 99 89 e8 cb 7e 22 05 bb 00 00 00 10 48\nRSP: 0018:ffa0000000cd7c30 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 9e129be1950f0200 RBX: ff1100011b51582c RCX: ff1100011857cd80\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000002\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffd400000000000f R09: ff1100013e78cac0\nR10: ffac800000cd7980 R11: ff1100013e12b1f0 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ff1100011a99a2ec\nFS: 00007fbd7086f740(0000) GS:ff1100013fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00000000200071c0 CR3: 0000000118556004 CR4: 0000000000771ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n proc_create_net_single+0x144/0x210 fs/proc/proc_net.c:220\n bcm_connect+0x472/0x840 net/can/bcm.c:1673\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2049 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x5d2/0x690 net/socket.c:2066\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2076 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2073 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x8f/0x100 net/socket.c:2073\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\nRIP: 0033:0x7fbd708b0e5d\nCode: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 9f 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fff8cd33f08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fbd708b0e5d\nRDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000040 R09: 0000000000000040\nR10: 0000000000000040 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff8cd34098\nR13: 0000000000401280 R14: 0000000000406de8 R15: 00007fbd70ab9000\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nremove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory \u0026apos;net/can-bcm\u0026apos;, leaking at least \u0026apos;2456\u0026apos;(CVE-2024-46771)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudf: Avoid excessive partition lengths\r\n\r\nAvoid mounting filesystems where the partition would overflow the\n32-bits used for block number. Also refuse to mount filesystems where\nthe partition length is so large we cannot safely index bits in a\nblock bitmap.(CVE-2024-46777)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: protect references to superblock parameters exposed in sysfs\r\n\r\nThe superblock buffers of nilfs2 can not only be overwritten at runtime\nfor modifications/repairs, but they are also regularly swapped, replaced\nduring resizing, and even abandoned when degrading to one side due to\nbacking device issues. So, accessing them requires mutual exclusion using\nthe reader/writer semaphore \u0026quot;nilfs-\u0026gt;ns_sem\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nSome sysfs attribute show methods read this superblock buffer without the\nnecessary mutual exclusion, which can cause problems with pointer\ndereferencing and memory access, so fix it.(CVE-2024-46780)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix missing cleanup on rollforward recovery error\r\n\r\nIn an error injection test of a routine for mount-time recovery, KASAN\nfound a use-after-free bug.\r\n\r\nIt turned out that if data recovery was performed using partial logs\ncreated by dsync writes, but an error occurred before starting the log\nwriter to create a recovered checkpoint, the inodes whose data had been\nrecovered were left in the ns_dirty_files list of the nilfs object and\nwere not freed.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by cleaning up inodes that have read the recovery data if\nthe recovery routine fails midway before the log writer starts.(CVE-2024-46781)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: mcp251x: fix deadlock if an interrupt occurs during mcp251x_open\r\n\r\nThe mcp251x_hw_wake() function is called with the mpc_lock mutex held and\ndisables the interrupt handler so that no interrupts can be processed while\nwaking the device. If an interrupt has already occurred then waiting for\nthe interrupt handler to complete will deadlock because it will be trying\nto acquire the same mutex.\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\n---- ----\nmcp251x_open()\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;mcp_lock)\n request_threaded_irq()\n \u0026lt;interrupt\u0026gt;\n mcp251x_can_ist()\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;mcp_lock)\n mcp251x_hw_wake()\n disable_irq() \u0026lt;-- deadlock\r\n\r\nUse disable_irq_nosync() instead because the interrupt handler does\neverything while holding the mutex so it doesn\u0026apos;t matter if it\u0026apos;s still\nrunning.(CVE-2024-46791)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: dapm: Fix UAF for snd_soc_pcm_runtime object\r\n\r\nWhen using kernel with the following extra config,\r\n\r\n - CONFIG_KASAN=y\n - CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC=y\n - CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE=y\n - CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y\n - CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=4096\r\n\r\nkernel detects that snd_pcm_suspend_all() access a freed\n\u0026apos;snd_soc_pcm_runtime\u0026apos; object when the system is suspended, which\nleads to a use-after-free bug:\r\n\r\n[ 52.047746] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in snd_pcm_suspend_all+0x1a8/0x270\n[ 52.047765] Read of size 1 at addr ffff0000b9434d50 by task systemd-sleep/2330\r\n\r\n[ 52.047785] Call trace:\n[ 52.047787] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3c0\n[ 52.047794] show_stack+0x34/0x50\n[ 52.047797] dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x8c\n[ 52.047802] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x74/0x2c0\n[ 52.047809] kasan_report+0x210/0x230\n[ 52.047815] __asan_report_load1_noabort+0x3c/0x50\n[ 52.047820] snd_pcm_suspend_all+0x1a8/0x270\n[ 52.047824] snd_soc_suspend+0x19c/0x4e0\r\n\r\nThe snd_pcm_sync_stop() has a NULL check on \u0026apos;substream-\u0026gt;runtime\u0026apos; before\nmaking any access. So we need to always set \u0026apos;substream-\u0026gt;runtime\u0026apos; to NULL\neverytime we kfree() it.(CVE-2024-46798)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Add array index check for hdcp ddc access\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity reports OVERRUN warning. Do not check if array\nindex valid.\r\n\r\n[How]\nCheck msg_id valid and valid array index.(CVE-2024-46804)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check msg_id before processing transcation\r\n\r\n[WHY \u0026amp; HOW]\nHDCP_MESSAGE_ID_INVALID (-1) is not a valid msg_id nor is it a valid\narray index, and it needs checking before used.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 4 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46814)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when link nums greater than max_links\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity report OVERRUN warning. There are\nonly max_links elements within dc-\u0026gt;links. link\ncount could up to AMDGPU_DM_MAX_DISPLAY_INDEX 31.\r\n\r\n[How]\nMake sure link count less than max_links.(CVE-2024-46816)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Check gpio_id before used as array index\r\n\r\n[WHY \u0026amp; HOW]\nGPIO_ID_UNKNOWN (-1) is not a valid value for array index and therefore\nshould be checked in advance.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 5 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-46818)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read\r\n\r\nAvoid using the negative values\nfor clk_idex as an index into an array pptable-\u0026gt;DpmDescriptor.\r\n\r\nV2: fix clk_index return check (Tim Huang)(CVE-2024-46821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrtmutex: Drop rt_mutex::wait_lock before scheduling\r\n\r\nrt_mutex_handle_deadlock() is called with rt_mutex::wait_lock held. In the\ngood case it returns with the lock held and in the deadlock case it emits a\nwarning and goes into an endless scheduling loop with the lock held, which\ntriggers the \u0026apos;scheduling in atomic\u0026apos; warning.\r\n\r\nUnlock rt_mutex::wait_lock in the dead lock case before issuing the warning\nand dropping into the schedule for ever loop.\r\n\r\n[ tglx: Moved unlock before the WARN(), removed the pointless comment,\n \tmassaged changelog, added Fixes tag ](CVE-2024-46829)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: hns3: void array out of bound when loop tnl_num\r\n\r\nWhen query reg inf of SSU, it loops tnl_num times. However, tnl_num comes\nfrom hardware and the length of array is a fixed value. To void array out\nof bound, make sure the loop time is not greater than the length of array(CVE-2024-46833)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: don\u0026apos;t BUG_ON on ENOMEM from btrfs_lookup_extent_info() in walk_down_proc()\r\n\r\nWe handle errors here properly, ENOMEM isn\u0026apos;t fatal, return the error.(CVE-2024-46841)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\num: line: always fill *error_out in setup_one_line()\r\n\r\nThe pointer isn\u0026apos;t initialized by callers, but I have\nencountered cases where it\u0026apos;s still printed; initialize\nit in all possible cases in setup_one_line().(CVE-2024-46844)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: meson: axg-card: fix \u0026apos;use-after-free\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nBuffer \u0026apos;card-\u0026gt;dai_link\u0026apos; is reallocated in \u0026apos;meson_card_reallocate_links()\u0026apos;,\nso move \u0026apos;pad\u0026apos; pointer initialization after this function when memory is\nalready reallocated.\r\n\r\nKasan bug report:\r\n\r\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in axg_card_add_link+0x76c/0x9bc\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff000000e8b260 by task modprobe/356\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 356 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G O 6.9.12-sdkernel #1\nCall trace:\n dump_backtrace+0x94/0xec\n show_stack+0x18/0x24\n dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90\n print_report+0xfc/0x5c0\n kasan_report+0xb8/0xfc\n __asan_load8+0x9c/0xb8\n axg_card_add_link+0x76c/0x9bc [snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card]\n meson_card_probe+0x344/0x3b8 [snd_soc_meson_card_utils]\n platform_probe+0x8c/0xf4\n really_probe+0x110/0x39c\n __driver_probe_device+0xb8/0x18c\n driver_probe_device+0x108/0x1d8\n __driver_attach+0xd0/0x25c\n bus_for_each_dev+0xe0/0x154\n driver_attach+0x34/0x44\n bus_add_driver+0x134/0x294\n driver_register+0xa8/0x1e8\n __platform_driver_register+0x44/0x54\n axg_card_pdrv_init+0x20/0x1000 [snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card]\n do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x25c\n do_init_module+0x10c/0x334\n load_module+0x24c4/0x26cc\n init_module_from_file+0xd4/0x128\n __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x1f4/0x41c\n invoke_syscall+0x60/0x188\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x78/0x13c\n do_el0_svc+0x30/0x40\n el0_svc+0x38/0x78\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c\n el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194(CVE-2024-46849)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Fix bridge mode operations when there are no VFs\r\n\r\nCurrently, trying to set the bridge mode attribute when numvfs=0 leads to a\ncrash:\r\n\r\nbridge link set dev eth2 hwmode vepa\r\n\r\n[ 168.967392] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030\n[...]\n[ 168.969989] RIP: 0010:mlx5_add_flow_rules+0x1f/0x300 [mlx5_core]\n[...]\n[ 168.976037] Call Trace:\n[ 168.976188] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 168.978620] _mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa_locked+0x113/0x230 [mlx5_core]\n[ 168.979074] mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa+0x7f/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n[ 168.979471] rtnl_bridge_setlink+0xe9/0x1f0\n[ 168.979714] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x159/0x400\n[ 168.980451] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100\n[ 168.980675] netlink_unicast+0x241/0x360\n[ 168.980918] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f6/0x430\n[ 168.981162] ____sys_sendmsg+0x3bb/0x3f0\n[ 168.982155] ___sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xd0\n[ 168.985036] __sys_sendmsg+0x59/0xa0\n[ 168.985477] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x150\n[ 168.987273] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n[ 168.987773] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f7950f917\r\n\r\n(esw-\u0026gt;fdb_table.legacy.vepa_fdb is null)\r\n\r\nThe bridge mode is only relevant when there are multiple functions per\nport. Therefore, prevent setting and getting this setting when there are no\nVFs.\r\n\r\nNote that after this change, there are no settings to change on the PF\ninterface using `bridge link` when there are no VFs, so the interface no\nlonger appears in the `bridge link` output.(CVE-2024-46857)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2216",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:41Z",
"published": "2024-10-12T11:07:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2216"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44958"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45016"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46695"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46732"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46753"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46833"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46841"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46849"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46857"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-27436",
"CVE-2024-36894",
"CVE-2024-38560",
"CVE-2024-38659",
"CVE-2024-39482",
"CVE-2024-41030",
"CVE-2024-41095",
"CVE-2024-43900",
"CVE-2024-44958",
"CVE-2024-44982",
"CVE-2024-45008",
"CVE-2024-45016",
"CVE-2024-46673",
"CVE-2024-46674",
"CVE-2024-46679",
"CVE-2024-46681",
"CVE-2024-46695",
"CVE-2024-46707",
"CVE-2024-46721",
"CVE-2024-46725",
"CVE-2024-46726",
"CVE-2024-46732",
"CVE-2024-46737",
"CVE-2024-46738",
"CVE-2024-46739",
"CVE-2024-46740",
"CVE-2024-46743",
"CVE-2024-46750",
"CVE-2024-46753",
"CVE-2024-46755",
"CVE-2024-46756",
"CVE-2024-46758",
"CVE-2024-46759",
"CVE-2024-46761",
"CVE-2024-46771",
"CVE-2024-46777",
"CVE-2024-46780",
"CVE-2024-46781",
"CVE-2024-46791",
"CVE-2024-46798",
"CVE-2024-46804",
"CVE-2024-46814",
"CVE-2024-46816",
"CVE-2024-46818",
"CVE-2024-46821",
"CVE-2024-46829",
"CVE-2024-46833",
"CVE-2024-46841",
"CVE-2024-46844",
"CVE-2024-46849",
"CVE-2024-46857"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.