Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-38578 (GCVE-0-2024-38578)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-06-19 13:37 – Updated: 2026-08-05 11:32| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < 1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1
(git)
Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < 235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1 (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < 12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93 (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < 0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < 2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910 (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74 (git) Affected: dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a , < 85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.21
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.21 (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.316 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.278 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.219 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.161 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.93 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.33 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.8.12 , ≤ 6.8.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.9.3 , ≤ 6.9.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Siemens | RUGGEDCOM RST2428P |
Affected:
0 , < V3.1
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family |
Unaffected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family |
Affected:
0 , < V3.1
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:32.595Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:06.312936Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T17:34:55.678Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:54:43.334Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\n\nThe \u0027TAG 66 Packet Format\u0027 description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\n\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\n\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\n\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The overflow is reached through a local `openat(O_CREAT)` syscall against a file in an eCryptfs mount; no network or remote peer data is involved.\nAC:L - The out-of-bounds write occurs deterministically on every file creation once the auth token is of private-key type, and the attacker chooses the allocation size via the `ecryptfs_key_bytes=`/`cipher=` mount options so the stray byte lands exactly on an adjacent kmalloc-32/kmalloc-64 object; no uncontrolled precondition or race is involved.\nPR:L - An unprivileged local user reaches this on standard eCryptfs deployments (ecryptfs-utils\u0027 setuid-root `mount.ecryptfs_private`, encrypted home/Private dirs), since the auth-token payload is a user-owned `key_type_user` key re-read on every file creation and `token_type` can be set to `ECRYPTFS_PRIVATE_KEY` by the user themselves.\nUI:N - The attacker performs the entire sequence (key setup, mount of their own private directory, file creation) with no action by any other user; the mount is already present in the normal per-user encrypted-home scenario.\nS:U - The heap corruption stays within the kernel\u0027s own security authority; no hypervisor, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - The overflow corrupts the first byte of a neighbouring slab object, which can be groomed to be a length/index/pointer field, converting the bug into an out-of-bounds read primitive and disclosure of arbitrary kernel memory.\nI:H - This is a heap out-of-bounds write into an adjacent slab allocation with attacker-controlled allocation size and brute-forceable byte value \u2014 a classic single-byte heap corruption primitive leading to control-flow hijack or privilege escalation.\nA:H - Corrupting adjacent slab metadata or object state readily produces kernel oops/panic, and the write is triggerable on every file creation, so the system can be crashed repeatedly at will."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:55.740Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
}
],
"title": "ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-38578",
"datePublished": "2024-06-19T13:37:36.487Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T19:36:34.926Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:55.740Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-38578",
"date": "2026-09-23",
"epss": "0.00263",
"percentile": "0.18503"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E315B994-7483-4734-BC1B-9F19C2CD9EF9",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FDBF235-DA18-49A1-8690-6C7272FD0701",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9063AF3-D593-43B7-810D-58B87F82F9F9",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "31130639-53FE-4726-8986-434EE2528CB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EEFB78EE-F990-4197-BF1C-156760A55667",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80550309-67AB-4FD1-AC07-3DED5C4F01B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E07124C1-19E8-4D21-828D-9932A01D3011",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\n\nThe \u0027TAG 66 Packet Format\u0027 description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\n\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\n\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\n\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ecryptfs: corrige el tama\u00f1o del b\u00fafer para el paquete etiqueta 66. A la descripci\u00f3n \u0027Formato de paquete TAG 66\u0027 le faltan el c\u00f3digo de cifrado y los campos de suma de verificaci\u00f3n que est\u00e1n empaquetados en el paquete de mensaje. Como resultado, el b\u00fafer asignado para el paquete es 3 bytes demasiado peque\u00f1o y write_tag_66_packet() escribir\u00e1 hasta 3 bytes m\u00e1s all\u00e1 del final del b\u00fafer. Solucione este problema aumentando el tama\u00f1o de la asignaci\u00f3n para que todo el paquete siempre quepa en el b\u00fafer. Esto corrige el siguiente error de kasan slab-out-of-bounds: ERROR: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 Escritura de tama\u00f1o 1 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff88800afbb2a5 mediante tarea t\u00e1ctil/181 CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm : touch No contaminado 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6 Nombre del hardware: PC est\u00e1ndar QEMU (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 01/04/2014 Seguimiento de llamadas: 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX : ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67 RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc088e4 8d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941 R13: 00000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040 Asignado por tarea 181: kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x66/0x160 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0 _write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 ruta_openat+ 0x17cf/0x1ba0 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:18:48.007",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:06.312936Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-19T14:15:17.870",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-19T10:26:16+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-38578",
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"initial_release_date": "2024-06-19T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "14",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "184",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-38578.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:32.595Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:54:43.334Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:06.312936Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:26.894Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\n\nThe \u0027TAG 66 Packet Format\u0027 description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\n\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\n\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\n\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The overflow is reached through a local `openat(O_CREAT)` syscall against a file in an eCryptfs mount; no network or remote peer data is involved.\nAC:L - The out-of-bounds write occurs deterministically on every file creation once the auth token is of private-key type, and the attacker chooses the allocation size via the `ecryptfs_key_bytes=`/`cipher=` mount options so the stray byte lands exactly on an adjacent kmalloc-32/kmalloc-64 object; no uncontrolled precondition or race is involved.\nPR:L - An unprivileged local user reaches this on standard eCryptfs deployments (ecryptfs-utils\u0027 setuid-root `mount.ecryptfs_private`, encrypted home/Private dirs), since the auth-token payload is a user-owned `key_type_user` key re-read on every file creation and `token_type` can be set to `ECRYPTFS_PRIVATE_KEY` by the user themselves.\nUI:N - The attacker performs the entire sequence (key setup, mount of their own private directory, file creation) with no action by any other user; the mount is already present in the normal per-user encrypted-home scenario.\nS:U - The heap corruption stays within the kernel\u0027s own security authority; no hypervisor, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - The overflow corrupts the first byte of a neighbouring slab object, which can be groomed to be a length/index/pointer field, converting the bug into an out-of-bounds read primitive and disclosure of arbitrary kernel memory.\nI:H - This is a heap out-of-bounds write into an adjacent slab allocation with attacker-controlled allocation size and brute-forceable byte value \u2014 a classic single-byte heap corruption primitive leading to control-flow hijack or privilege escalation.\nA:H - Corrupting adjacent slab metadata or object state readily produces kernel oops/panic, and the write is triggerable on every file creation, so the system can be crashed repeatedly at will."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:55.740Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
}
],
"title": "ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-38578",
"datePublished": "2024-06-19T13:37:36.487Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T19:36:34.926Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:55.740Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-08-23 - Updated: 2024-08-23
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2980-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242980-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2940-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242940-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2944-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242944-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2943-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242943-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2948-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242948-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2973-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242973-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242947-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-13 - Updated: 2024-09-13
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7005-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7008-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7008-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-6999-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7006-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7006-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7004-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7004-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-20 - Updated: 2024-09-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7022-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7022-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7009-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7019-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7019-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7005-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-2"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-27 - Updated: 2024-09-27
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7039-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7039-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-6999-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7009-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7029-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7029-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7028-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7028-1"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-38578
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-06-19 14:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 11:187.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "dddfa461fc8951f9b5f951c13565b6cac678635a",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"fs/ecryptfs/keystore.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.21"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.21",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E315B994-7483-4734-BC1B-9F19C2CD9EF9",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.21",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FDBF235-DA18-49A1-8690-6C7272FD0701",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9063AF3-D593-43B7-810D-58B87F82F9F9",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "31130639-53FE-4726-8986-434EE2528CB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EEFB78EE-F990-4197-BF1C-156760A55667",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80550309-67AB-4FD1-AC07-3DED5C4F01B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E07124C1-19E8-4D21-828D-9932A01D3011",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\n\nThe \u0027TAG 66 Packet Format\u0027 description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\n\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\n\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\n\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ecryptfs: corrige el tama\u00f1o del b\u00fafer para el paquete etiqueta 66. A la descripci\u00f3n \u0027Formato de paquete TAG 66\u0027 le faltan el c\u00f3digo de cifrado y los campos de suma de verificaci\u00f3n que est\u00e1n empaquetados en el paquete de mensaje. Como resultado, el b\u00fafer asignado para el paquete es 3 bytes demasiado peque\u00f1o y write_tag_66_packet() escribir\u00e1 hasta 3 bytes m\u00e1s all\u00e1 del final del b\u00fafer. Solucione este problema aumentando el tama\u00f1o de la asignaci\u00f3n para que todo el paquete siempre quepa en el b\u00fafer. Esto corrige el siguiente error de kasan slab-out-of-bounds: ERROR: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 Escritura de tama\u00f1o 1 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff88800afbb2a5 mediante tarea t\u00e1ctil/181 CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm : touch No contaminado 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6 Nombre del hardware: PC est\u00e1ndar QEMU (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 01/04/2014 Seguimiento de llamadas: 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX : ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67 RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc088e4 8d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941 R13: 00000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040 Asignado por tarea 181: kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x66/0x160 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0 _write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 ruta_openat+ 0x17cf/0x1ba0 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:18:48.007",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38578",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:06.312936Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-19T14:15:17.870",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-Q624-V3V9-VMP4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-19 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet
The 'TAG 66 Packet Format' description is missing the cipher code and checksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result, the buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and write_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the buffer.
Fix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet will always fit in the buffer.
This fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70 print_report+0xc5/0x610 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 kasan_report+0xc2/0x110 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 __asan_store1+0x62/0x80 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10 ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540 ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d] ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10 ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67 Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67 RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040
Allocated by task 181: kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x66/0x160 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38578"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-19T14:15:17Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\n\nThe \u0027TAG 66 Packet Format\u0027 description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\n\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\n\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\n\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8",
"id": "GHSA-q624-v3v9-vmp4",
"modified": "2026-05-12T12:31:55Z",
"published": "2024-06-19T15:30:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d0f8ba042af16519f1ef7dd10463a33b21b677c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12db25a54ce6bb22b0af28010fff53ef9cb3fe93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c125b9287e58f364d82174efb167414b92b11f1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/235b85981051cd68fc215fd32a81c6f116bfc4df"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ed750b7ae1b5dc72896d7dd114c419afd3d1910"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85a6a1aff08ec9f5b929d345d066e2830e8818e5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a20f09452e2f58f761d11ad7b96b5c894c91030e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edbfc42ab080e78c6907d40a42c9d10b69e445c1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6008487f1eeb8693f8d2a36a89c87d9122ddf74"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-24-102-01
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2024-04-09 00:00 - Updated: 2026-05-14 06:00ICSA-25-226-15
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00OESA-2024-1835 (CVE-2021-47270)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-07-12 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: fix various gadgets null ptr deref on 10gbps cabling.
This avoids a null pointer dereference in f_{ecm,eem,hid,loopback,printer,rndis,serial,sourcesink,subset,tcm} by simply reusing the 5gbps config for 10gbps.(CVE-2021-47270)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
seg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block
When an IPv4 packet is received, the ip_rcv_core(...) sets the receiving interface index into the IPv4 socket control block (v5.16-rc4, net/ipv4/ip_input.c line 510):
IPCB(skb)->iif = skb->skb_iif;
If that IPv4 packet is meant to be encapsulated in an outer IPv6+SRH header, the seg6_do_srh_encap(...) performs the required encapsulation. In this case, the seg6_do_srh_encap function clears the IPv6 socket control block (v5.16-rc4 net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c line 163):
memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
The memset(...) was introduced in commit ef489749aae5 ("ipv6: sr: clear IP6CB(skb) on SRH ip4ip6 encapsulation") a long time ago (2019-01-29).
Since the IPv6 socket control block and the IPv4 socket control block share the same memory area (skb->cb), the receiving interface index info is lost (IP6CB(skb)->iif is set to zero).
As a side effect, that condition triggers a NULL pointer dereference if commit 0857d6f8c759 ("ipv6: When forwarding count rx stats on the orig netdev") is applied.
To fix that issue, we set the IP6CB(skb)->iif with the index of the receiving interface once again.(CVE-2021-47515)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: mxl111sf: change mutex_init() location
Syzbot reported, that mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() uses uninitialized mutex. The problem was in wrong mutex_init() location.
Previous mutex_init(&state->msg_lock) call was in ->init() function, but dvb_usbv2_init() has this order of calls:
dvb_usbv2_init()
dvb_usbv2_adapter_init()
dvb_usbv2_adapter_frontend_init()
props->frontend_attach()
props->init()
Since mxl111sf_ devices call mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() in ->frontend_attach() internally we need to initialize state->msg_lock before frontend_attach(). To achieve it, ->probe() call added to all mxl111sf_ devices, which will simply initiaize mutex.(CVE-2021-47583)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mac80211: validate extended element ID is present
Before attempting to parse an extended element, verify that the extended element ID is present.(CVE-2021-47611)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: Fix queues reservation for XDP
When XDP was configured on a system with large number of CPUs and X722 NIC there was a call trace with NULL pointer dereference.
i40e 0000:87:00.0: failed to get tracking for 256 queues for VSI 0 err -12 i40e 0000:87:00.0: setup of MAIN VSI failed
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 RIP: 0010:i40e_xdp+0xea/0x1b0 [i40e] Call Trace: ? i40e_reconfig_rss_queues+0x130/0x130 [i40e] dev_xdp_install+0x61/0xe0 dev_xdp_attach+0x18a/0x4c0 dev_change_xdp_fd+0x1e6/0x220 do_setlink+0x616/0x1030 ? ahci_port_stop+0x80/0x80 ? ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0 ? lock_timer_base+0x61/0x80 ? __mod_timer+0x202/0x380 rtnl_setlink+0xe5/0x170 ? bpf_lsm_binder_transaction+0x10/0x10 ? security_capable+0x36/0x50 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x121/0x350 ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x100/0x100 netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0xf0 netlink_unicast+0x1d3/0x2a0 netlink_sendmsg+0x22a/0x440 sock_sendmsg+0x5e/0x60 __sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160 ? __sys_getsockname+0x7e/0xc0 ? _copy_from_user+0x3c/0x80 ? __sys_setsockopt+0xc8/0x1a0 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f83fa7a39e0
This was caused by PF queue pile fragmentation due to flow director VSI queue being placed right after main VSI. Because of this main VSI was not able to resize its queue allocation for XDP resulting in no queues allocated for main VSI when XDP was turned on.
Fix this by always allocating last queue in PF queue pile for a flow director VSI.(CVE-2021-47619)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: max9759: fix underflow in speaker_gain_control_put()
Check for negative values of "priv->gain" to prevent an out of bounds access. The concern is that these might come from the user via: -> snd_ctl_elem_write_user() -> snd_ctl_elem_write() -> kctl->put()(CVE-2022-48717)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ieee802154: ca8210: Stop leaking skb's
Upon error the ieee802154_xmit_complete() helper is not called. Only ieee802154_wake_queue() is called manually. We then leak the skb structure.
Free the skb structure upon error before returning.(CVE-2022-48722)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2022-48736)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw()
We don't currently validate that the values being set are within the range we advertised to userspace as being valid, do so and reject any values that are out of range.(CVE-2022-48738)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow
There will be BUG_ON() triggered in include/linux/skbuff.h leading to intermittent kernel panic, when the skb length underflow is detected.
Fix this by dropping the packet if such length underflows are seen because of inconsistencies in the hardware descriptors.(CVE-2022-48743)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid intentionally writing across neighboring fields.
Use flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they are always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves that can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.
We were doing:
#define ETH_HLEN 14
#define VLAN_HLEN 4
...
#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)
...
struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);
...
struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = &wqe->eth;
struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe->data;
...
memcpy(eseg->inline_hdr.start, xdptxd->data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);
target is wqe->eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being 2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start (really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into wqe->data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr (8 bytes).
struct mlx5e_tx_wqe { struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; / 0 16 / struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; / 16 16 / struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; / 32 0 /
/* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
};
struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg { u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; / 0 1 / u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; / 1 1 / u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; / 2 1 / u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; / 3 1 / u8 cs_flags; / 4 1 / u8 swp_flags; / 5 1 / __be16 mss; / 6 2 / __be32 flow_table_metadata; / 8 4 / union { struct { __be16 sz; / 12 2 / u8 start[2]; / 14 2 / } inline_hdr; / 12 4 / struct { __be16 type; / 12 2 / __be16 vlan_tci; / 14 2 / } insert; / 12 4 / __be32 trailer; / 12 4 / }; / 12 4 /
/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg { __be32 byte_count; / 0 4 / __be32 lkey; / 4 4 / __be64 addr; / 8 8 /
/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
So, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer sizes.
"pahole" shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe nor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. "objdump -d" shows no meaningful object code changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and optimizations).(CVE-2022-48744)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: bnx2fc: Flush destroy_work queue before calling bnx2fc_interface_put()
The bnx2fc_destroy() functions are removing the interface before calling destroy_work. This results multiple WARNings from sysfs_remove_group() as the controller rport device attributes are removed too early.
Replace the fcoe_port's destroy_work queue. It's not needed.
The problem is easily reproducible with the following steps.
Example:
$ dmesg -w & $ systemctl enable --now fcoe $ fipvlan -s -c ens2f1 $ fcoeadm -d ens2f1.802 [ 583.464488] host2: libfc: Link down on port (7500a1) [ 583.472651] bnx2fc: 7500a1 - rport not created Yet!! [ 583.490468] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 583.538725] sysfs group 'power' not found for kobject 'rport-2:0-0' [ 583.568814] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 192 at fs/sysfs/group.c:279 sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80 [ 583.607130] Modules linked in: dm_service_time 8021q garp mrp stp llc bnx2fc cnic uio rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 ... [ 583.942994] CPU: 3 PID: 192 Comm: kworker/3:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-39.el9.x86_64 #1 [ 583.984105] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL120 G7, BIOS J01 07/01/2013 [ 584.016535] Workqueue: fc_wq_2 fc_rport_final_delete [scsi_transport_fc] [ 584.050691] RIP: 0010:sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80 [ 584.074725] Code: ff 5b 48 89 ef 5d 41 5c e9 ee c0 ff ff 48 89 ef e8 f6 b8 ff ff eb d1 49 8b 14 24 48 8b 33 48 c7 c7 ... [ 584.162586] RSP: 0018:ffffb567c15afdc0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 584.188225] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8eec4220 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 584.221053] RDX: ffff8c1586ce84c0 RSI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0 RDI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0 [ 584.255089] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb567c15afc00 [ 584.287954] R10: ffffb567c15afbf8 R11: ffffffff8fbe7f28 R12: ffff8c1486326400 [ 584.322356] R13: ffff8c1486326480 R14: ffff8c1483a4a000 R15: 0000000000000004 [ 584.355379] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c1586cc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 584.394419] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 584.421123] CR2: 00007fe95a6f7840 CR3: 0000000107674002 CR4: 00000000000606e0 [ 584.454888] Call Trace: [ 584.466108] device_del+0xb2/0x3e0 [ 584.481701] device_unregister+0x13/0x60 [ 584.501306] bsg_unregister_queue+0x5b/0x80 [ 584.522029] bsg_remove_queue+0x1c/0x40 [ 584.541884] fc_rport_final_delete+0xf3/0x1d0 [scsi_transport_fc] [ 584.573823] process_one_work+0x1e3/0x3b0 [ 584.592396] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 584.609256] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370 [ 584.628877] kthread+0x149/0x170 [ 584.643673] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 584.662909] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 584.680002] ---[ end trace 53575ecefa942ece ]---(CVE-2022-48758)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def
The driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.
The following log reveals it:
[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414 [ 29.612820] Call Trace: [ 29.613030] <TASK> [ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7 [ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190 [ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0 [ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60 [ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310 [ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: sdio: fix possible resource leaks in some error paths
If sdio_add_func() or sdio_init_func() fails, sdio_remove_func() can not release the resources, because the sdio function is not presented in these two cases, it won't call of_node_put() or put_device().
To fix these leaks, make sdio_func_present() only control whether device_del() needs to be called or not, then always call of_node_put() and put_device().
In error case in sdio_init_func(), the reference of 'card->dev' is not get, to avoid redundant put in sdio_free_func_cis(), move the get_device() to sdio_alloc_func() and put_device() to sdio_release_func(), it can keep the get/put function be balanced.
Without this patch, while doing fault inject test, it can get the following leak reports, after this fix, the leak is gone.
unreferenced object 0xffff888112514000 (size 2048): comm "kworker/3:2", pid 65, jiffies 4294741614 (age 124.774s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 e0 6f 12 81 88 ff ff 60 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff ..o.....`X...... 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff .@Q......@Q..... backtrace: [<000000009e5931da>] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110 [<000000002f839ccb>] mmc_alloc_card+0x38/0xb0 [mmc_core] [<0000000004adcbf6>] mmc_sdio_init_card+0xde/0x170 [mmc_core] [<000000007538fea0>] mmc_attach_sdio+0xcb/0x1b0 [mmc_core] [<00000000d4fdeba7>] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 [mmc_core]
unreferenced object 0xffff888112511000 (size 2048): comm "kworker/3:2", pid 65, jiffies 4294741623 (age 124.766s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff e0 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff .@Q......X...... 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff ..Q.......Q..... backtrace: [<000000009e5931da>] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110 [<00000000fcbe706c>] sdio_alloc_func+0x35/0x100 [mmc_core] [<00000000c68f4b50>] mmc_attach_sdio.cold.18+0xb1/0x395 [mmc_core] [<00000000d4fdeba7>] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 mmc_core
In the Linux kernel through 6.7.1, there is a use-after-free in cec_queue_msg_fh, related to drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c and drivers/media/cec/core/cec-api.c.(CVE-2024-23848)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline
The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the original CPU.
When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU, but the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately reclaimed. Instead, apicd->move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming process is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.
Upon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU, irq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU's vector_cleanup list if it remains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its vector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.
However, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the interrupt triggers again on the new CPU.
In that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU to reclaim the old apicd->prev_vector because the interrupt isn't currently affine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even though __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it doesn't reclaim apicd->prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both apicd->move_in_progress and apicd->prev_vector to 0.
As a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a CPU vector leak.
To address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move() before the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd->prev_vector, if the interrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.
Additionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well, following a warning message, although theoretically it should never see apicd->move_in_progress with apicd->prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: act_skbmod: prevent kernel-infoleak
syzbot found that tcf_skbmod_dump() was copying four bytes from kernel stack to user space [1].
The issue here is that 'struct tc_skbmod' has a four bytes hole.
We need to clear the structure before filling fields.
[1] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline] simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline] __skb_datagram_iter+0x185/0x1000 net/core/datagram.c:420 skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5c/0x200 net/core/datagram.c:546 skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4050 [inline] netlink_recvmsg+0x432/0x1610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1962 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068 __sys_recvfrom+0x35a/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2242 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2256 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x126/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2256 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was stored to memory at: pskb_expand_head+0x30f/0x19d0 net/core/skbuff.c:2253 netlink_trim+0x2c2/0x330 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317 netlink_unicast+0x9f/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1351 nlmsg_unicast include/net/netlink.h:1144 [inline] nlmsg_notify+0x21d/0x2f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2610 rtnetlink_send+0x73/0x90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:741 rtnetlink_maybe_send include/linux/rtnetlink.h:17 [inline] tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2048 [inline] tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x146e/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2559 rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6613 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf4c/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10df/0x11f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was stored to memory at: __nla_put lib/nlattr.c:1041 [inline] nla_put+0x1c6/0x230 lib/nlattr.c:1099 tcf_skbmod_dump+0x23f/0xc20 net/sched/act_skbmod.c:256 tcf_action_dump_old net/sched/act_api.c:1191 [inline] tcf_action_dump_1+0x85e/0x970 net/sched/act_api.c:1227 tcf_action_dump+0x1fd/0x460 net/sched/act_api.c:1251 tca_get_fill+0x519/0x7a0 net/sched/act_api.c:1628 tcf_add_notify_msg net/sched/act_api.c:2023 [inline] tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2042 [inline] tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x1365/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netli ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1][2]:
nci_rx_work() parses and processes received packet. When the payload length is zero, each message type handler reads uninitialized payload and KMSAN detects this issue. The receipt of a packet with a zero-size payload is considered unexpected, and therefore, such packets should be silently discarded.
This patch resolved this issue by checking payload size before calling each message type handler codes.(CVE-2024-35915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/arm/malidp: fix a possible null pointer dereference
In malidp_mw_connector_reset, new memory is allocated with kzalloc, but no check is performed. In order to prevent null pointer dereferencing, ensure that mw_state is checked before calling __drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset.(CVE-2024-36014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
amd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted
If there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first device will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes on all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will start reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been evicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page fault.(CVE-2024-36949)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in dctcp_update_alpha().
In dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g as follows:
alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha >> dctcp_shift_g); ... delivered_ce <<= (10 - dctcp_shift_g);
It seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered shift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g:
memcpy((void)0x20000080, "/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\000", 47); res = syscall(__NR_openat, /fd=/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /file=/0x20000080ul, /flags=/2ul, /mode=/0ul); memcpy((void)0x20000000, "100\000", 4); syscall(__NR_write, /fd=/r[0], /val=/0x20000000ul, /len=/4ul);
Let's limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax().
With this patch:
# echo 10 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g 10 # echo 11 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[0]: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12 shift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') CPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468 dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143 tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline] tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline] __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983 release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549 mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907 mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976 __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072 mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127 inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878 do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c. RSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0 R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 </TASK>(CVE-2024-37356)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference
In vc4_hdmi_audio_init() of_get_address() may return NULL which is later dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38546)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks
There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the commit ac0a230f719b ("eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks"). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the .ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver, so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device
There is a reference count leak issue of the object "net_device" in ax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one or zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause memory leak.
In order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of net_device after dev->ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qedf: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a count-sized kernel buffer and copy count from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use kstrtouint on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using kstrtouint. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38559)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet
The 'TAG 66 Packet Format' description is missing the cipher code and checksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result, the buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and write_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the buffer.
Fix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet will always fit in the buffer.
This fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70 print_report+0xc5/0x610 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 kasan_report+0xc2/0x110 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 __asan_store1+0x62/0x80 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10 ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540 ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d] ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10 ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67 Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67 RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040 </TASK>
Allocated by task 181: kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x66/0x160 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8(CVE-2024-38578)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic
In spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len instead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the buffer boundaries. Fix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()
Syzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called during nilfs2 unmount.
Analysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which synchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after nilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace below:
nilfs_detach_log_writer nilfs_segctor_destroy nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --> Shut down log writer thread flush_work nilfs_iput_work_func nilfs_dispose_list iput nilfs_evict_inode nilfs_transaction_commit nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync) nilfs_segctor_sync --> Attempt to synchronize with log writer thread *** DEADLOCK ***
Fix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer thread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by forcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread terminates.
The skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the subsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread
Patch series "nilfs2: fix log writer related issues".
This bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues, including a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on unmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found during their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.
This patch (of 3):
A use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on the nilfs_sc_info structure.
The problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log writer thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure is about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread's lifetime.
Fix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer thread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time
Currently ALSA timer doesn't have the lower limit of the start tick time, and it allows a very small size, e.g. 1 tick with 1ns resolution for hrtimer. Such a situation may lead to an unexpected RCU stall, where the callback repeatedly queuing the expire update, as reported by fuzzer.
This patch introduces a sanity check of the timer start tick time, so that the system returns an error when a too small start size is set. As of this patch, the lower limit is hard-coded to 100us, which is small enough but can still work somehow.(CVE-2024-38618)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal
The removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal of the driver. However, code doesn't update the respective global variable and after insmod — rmmod — insmod cycle the kernel oopses:
max3100 spi-PRP0001:01: max3100_probe: adding port 0 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000408 ... RIP: 0010:serial_core_register_port+0xa0/0x840 ... max3100_probe+0x1b6/0x280 [max3100] spi_probe+0x8d/0xb0
Update the actual state so next time UART driver will be registered again.
Hugo also noticed, that the error path in the probe also affected by having the variable set, and not cleared. Instead of clearing it move the assignment after the successfull uart_register_driver() call.(CVE-2024-38633)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Lock port->lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()
uart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken, Since we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at the time of running. Make sure that it's taken by explicitly doing that. Without it we got a splat:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100] RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100] max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 max3100
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode
If channel for the given node is not found we return null from get_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer before using it in two of the missing places.
This was originally reported in [0]: Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port
enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX. These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c) using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands read access in the memcpys of the data of these attributes in enic_set_vf_port.(CVE-2024-38659)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-buf/sw-sync: don't enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()
Since commit a6aa8fca4d79 ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from known context") by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with spin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite sync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains inconsistent lock state warning.
Use plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for sync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()
Syzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline] new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391 slaballoc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525 slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852 p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline] p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641 p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
If p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req->rc.tag will not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res() ends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc() finishes.
Fix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields such as 'tag' and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) 'id' during the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2407.3.0.0285.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: fix various gadgets null ptr deref on 10gbps cabling.\r\n\r\nThis avoids a null pointer dereference in\nf_{ecm,eem,hid,loopback,printer,rndis,serial,sourcesink,subset,tcm}\nby simply reusing the 5gbps config for 10gbps.(CVE-2021-47270)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nseg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block\r\n\r\nWhen an IPv4 packet is received, the ip_rcv_core(...) sets the receiving\ninterface index into the IPv4 socket control block (v5.16-rc4,\nnet/ipv4/ip_input.c line 510):\r\n\r\n IPCB(skb)-\u0026gt;iif = skb-\u0026gt;skb_iif;\r\n\r\nIf that IPv4 packet is meant to be encapsulated in an outer IPv6+SRH\nheader, the seg6_do_srh_encap(...) performs the required encapsulation.\nIn this case, the seg6_do_srh_encap function clears the IPv6 socket control\nblock (v5.16-rc4 net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c line 163):\r\n\r\n memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));\r\n\r\nThe memset(...) was introduced in commit ef489749aae5 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: clear\nIP6CB(skb) on SRH ip4ip6 encapsulation\u0026quot;) a long time ago (2019-01-29).\r\n\r\nSince the IPv6 socket control block and the IPv4 socket control block share\nthe same memory area (skb-\u0026gt;cb), the receiving interface index info is lost\n(IP6CB(skb)-\u0026gt;iif is set to zero).\r\n\r\nAs a side effect, that condition triggers a NULL pointer dereference if\ncommit 0857d6f8c759 (\u0026quot;ipv6: When forwarding count rx stats on the orig\nnetdev\u0026quot;) is applied.\r\n\r\nTo fix that issue, we set the IP6CB(skb)-\u0026gt;iif with the index of the\nreceiving interface once again.(CVE-2021-47515)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: mxl111sf: change mutex_init() location\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported, that mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() uses uninitialized\nmutex. The problem was in wrong mutex_init() location.\r\n\r\nPrevious mutex_init(\u0026amp;state-\u0026gt;msg_lock) call was in -\u0026gt;init() function, but\ndvb_usbv2_init() has this order of calls:\r\n\r\n\tdvb_usbv2_init()\n\t dvb_usbv2_adapter_init()\n\t dvb_usbv2_adapter_frontend_init()\n\t props-\u0026gt;frontend_attach()\r\n\r\n\t props-\u0026gt;init()\r\n\r\nSince mxl111sf_* devices call mxl111sf_ctrl_msg() in -\u0026gt;frontend_attach()\ninternally we need to initialize state-\u0026gt;msg_lock before\nfrontend_attach(). To achieve it, -\u0026gt;probe() call added to all mxl111sf_*\ndevices, which will simply initiaize mutex.(CVE-2021-47583)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmac80211: validate extended element ID is present\r\n\r\nBefore attempting to parse an extended element, verify that\nthe extended element ID is present.(CVE-2021-47611)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni40e: Fix queues reservation for XDP\r\n\r\nWhen XDP was configured on a system with large number of CPUs\nand X722 NIC there was a call trace with NULL pointer dereference.\r\n\r\ni40e 0000:87:00.0: failed to get tracking for 256 queues for VSI 0 err -12\ni40e 0000:87:00.0: setup of MAIN VSI failed\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nRIP: 0010:i40e_xdp+0xea/0x1b0 [i40e]\nCall Trace:\n? i40e_reconfig_rss_queues+0x130/0x130 [i40e]\ndev_xdp_install+0x61/0xe0\ndev_xdp_attach+0x18a/0x4c0\ndev_change_xdp_fd+0x1e6/0x220\ndo_setlink+0x616/0x1030\n? ahci_port_stop+0x80/0x80\n? ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0\n? lock_timer_base+0x61/0x80\n? __mod_timer+0x202/0x380\nrtnl_setlink+0xe5/0x170\n? bpf_lsm_binder_transaction+0x10/0x10\n? security_capable+0x36/0x50\nrtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x121/0x350\n? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x100/0x100\nnetlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0xf0\nnetlink_unicast+0x1d3/0x2a0\nnetlink_sendmsg+0x22a/0x440\nsock_sendmsg+0x5e/0x60\n__sys_sendto+0xf0/0x160\n? __sys_getsockname+0x7e/0xc0\n? _copy_from_user+0x3c/0x80\n? __sys_setsockopt+0xc8/0x1a0\n__x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30\ndo_syscall_64+0x33/0x40\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\nRIP: 0033:0x7f83fa7a39e0\r\n\r\nThis was caused by PF queue pile fragmentation due to\nflow director VSI queue being placed right after main VSI.\nBecause of this main VSI was not able to resize its\nqueue allocation for XDP resulting in no queues allocated\nfor main VSI when XDP was turned on.\r\n\r\nFix this by always allocating last queue in PF queue pile\nfor a flow director VSI.(CVE-2021-47619)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: max9759: fix underflow in speaker_gain_control_put()\r\n\r\nCheck for negative values of \u0026quot;priv-\u0026gt;gain\u0026quot; to prevent an out of bounds\naccess. The concern is that these might come from the user via:\n -\u0026gt; snd_ctl_elem_write_user()\n -\u0026gt; snd_ctl_elem_write()\n -\u0026gt; kctl-\u0026gt;put()(CVE-2022-48717)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ieee802154: ca8210: Stop leaking skb\u0026apos;s\r\n\r\nUpon error the ieee802154_xmit_complete() helper is not called. Only\nieee802154_wake_queue() is called manually. We then leak the skb\nstructure.\r\n\r\nFree the skb structure upon error before returning.(CVE-2022-48722)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2022-48736)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw()\r\n\r\nWe don\u0026apos;t currently validate that the values being set are within the range\nwe advertised to userspace as being valid, do so and reject any values\nthat are out of range.(CVE-2022-48738)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow\r\n\r\nThere will be BUG_ON() triggered in include/linux/skbuff.h leading to\nintermittent kernel panic, when the skb length underflow is detected.\r\n\r\nFix this by dropping the packet if such length underflows are seen\nbecause of inconsistencies in the hardware descriptors.(CVE-2022-48743)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()\r\n\r\nIn preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time\nfield bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid\nintentionally writing across neighboring fields.\r\n\r\nUse flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they\nare always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves\nthat can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.\r\n\r\nWe were doing:\r\n\r\n\t#define ETH_HLEN 14\n\t#define VLAN_HLEN 4\n\t...\n\t#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)\n\t...\n struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);\n\t...\n struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = \u0026amp;wqe-\u0026gt;eth;\n struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe-\u0026gt;data;\n\t...\n\tmemcpy(eseg-\u0026gt;inline_hdr.start, xdptxd-\u0026gt;data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);\r\n\r\ntarget is wqe-\u0026gt;eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being\n2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start\n(really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into\nwqe-\u0026gt;data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr\n(8 bytes).\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5e_tx_wqe {\n struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; /* 0 16 */\n struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; /* 16 16 */\n struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; /* 32 0 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */\n /* last cacheline: 32 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg {\n u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; /* 0 1 */\n u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; /* 1 1 */\n u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; /* 2 1 */\n u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; /* 3 1 */\n u8 cs_flags; /* 4 1 */\n u8 swp_flags; /* 5 1 */\n __be16 mss; /* 6 2 */\n __be32 flow_table_metadata; /* 8 4 */\n union {\n struct {\n __be16 sz; /* 12 2 */\n u8 start[2]; /* 14 2 */\n } inline_hdr; /* 12 4 */\n struct {\n __be16 type; /* 12 2 */\n __be16 vlan_tci; /* 14 2 */\n } insert; /* 12 4 */\n __be32 trailer; /* 12 4 */\n }; /* 12 4 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */\n /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5_wqe_data_seg {\n __be32 byte_count; /* 0 4 */\n __be32 lkey; /* 4 4 */\n __be64 addr; /* 8 8 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */\n /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nSo, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer\nsizes.\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;pahole\u0026quot; shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe\nnor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. \u0026quot;objdump -d\u0026quot; shows no meaningful object\ncode changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and\noptimizations).(CVE-2022-48744)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: bnx2fc: Flush destroy_work queue before calling bnx2fc_interface_put()\r\n\r\nThe bnx2fc_destroy() functions are removing the interface before calling\ndestroy_work. This results multiple WARNings from sysfs_remove_group() as\nthe controller rport device attributes are removed too early.\r\n\r\nReplace the fcoe_port\u0026apos;s destroy_work queue. It\u0026apos;s not needed.\r\n\r\nThe problem is easily reproducible with the following steps.\r\n\r\nExample:\r\n\r\n $ dmesg -w \u0026amp;\n $ systemctl enable --now fcoe\n $ fipvlan -s -c ens2f1\n $ fcoeadm -d ens2f1.802\n [ 583.464488] host2: libfc: Link down on port (7500a1)\n [ 583.472651] bnx2fc: 7500a1 - rport not created Yet!!\n [ 583.490468] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n [ 583.538725] sysfs group \u0026apos;power\u0026apos; not found for kobject \u0026apos;rport-2:0-0\u0026apos;\n [ 583.568814] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 192 at fs/sysfs/group.c:279 sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80\n [ 583.607130] Modules linked in: dm_service_time 8021q garp mrp stp llc bnx2fc cnic uio rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 ...\n [ 583.942994] CPU: 3 PID: 192 Comm: kworker/3:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-39.el9.x86_64 #1\n [ 583.984105] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL120 G7, BIOS J01 07/01/2013\n [ 584.016535] Workqueue: fc_wq_2 fc_rport_final_delete [scsi_transport_fc]\n [ 584.050691] RIP: 0010:sysfs_remove_group+0x6f/0x80\n [ 584.074725] Code: ff 5b 48 89 ef 5d 41 5c e9 ee c0 ff ff 48 89 ef e8 f6 b8 ff ff eb d1 49 8b 14 24 48 8b 33 48 c7 c7 ...\n [ 584.162586] RSP: 0018:ffffb567c15afdc0 EFLAGS: 00010282\n [ 584.188225] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8eec4220 RCX: 0000000000000000\n [ 584.221053] RDX: ffff8c1586ce84c0 RSI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0 RDI: ffff8c1586cd7cc0\n [ 584.255089] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb567c15afc00\n [ 584.287954] R10: ffffb567c15afbf8 R11: ffffffff8fbe7f28 R12: ffff8c1486326400\n [ 584.322356] R13: ffff8c1486326480 R14: ffff8c1483a4a000 R15: 0000000000000004\n [ 584.355379] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c1586cc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [ 584.394419] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [ 584.421123] CR2: 00007fe95a6f7840 CR3: 0000000107674002 CR4: 00000000000606e0\n [ 584.454888] Call Trace:\n [ 584.466108] device_del+0xb2/0x3e0\n [ 584.481701] device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n [ 584.501306] bsg_unregister_queue+0x5b/0x80\n [ 584.522029] bsg_remove_queue+0x1c/0x40\n [ 584.541884] fc_rport_final_delete+0xf3/0x1d0 [scsi_transport_fc]\n [ 584.573823] process_one_work+0x1e3/0x3b0\n [ 584.592396] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0\n [ 584.609256] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370\n [ 584.628877] kthread+0x149/0x170\n [ 584.643673] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40\n [ 584.662909] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n [ 584.680002] ---[ end trace 53575ecefa942ece ]---(CVE-2022-48758)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def\r\n\r\nThe driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414\n[ 29.612820] Call Trace:\n[ 29.613030] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f\n[ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7\n[ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190\n[ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0\n[ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60\n[ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310\n[ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: sdio: fix possible resource leaks in some error paths\r\n\r\nIf sdio_add_func() or sdio_init_func() fails, sdio_remove_func() can\nnot release the resources, because the sdio function is not presented\nin these two cases, it won\u0026apos;t call of_node_put() or put_device().\r\n\r\nTo fix these leaks, make sdio_func_present() only control whether\ndevice_del() needs to be called or not, then always call of_node_put()\nand put_device().\r\n\r\nIn error case in sdio_init_func(), the reference of \u0026apos;card-\u0026gt;dev\u0026apos; is\nnot get, to avoid redundant put in sdio_free_func_cis(), move the\nget_device() to sdio_alloc_func() and put_device() to sdio_release_func(),\nit can keep the get/put function be balanced.\r\n\r\nWithout this patch, while doing fault inject test, it can get the\nfollowing leak reports, after this fix, the leak is gone.\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff888112514000 (size 2048):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/3:2\u0026quot;, pid 65, jiffies 4294741614 (age 124.774s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 e0 6f 12 81 88 ff ff 60 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff ..o.....`X......\n 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff .@Q......@Q.....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009e5931da\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110\n [\u0026lt;000000002f839ccb\u0026gt;] mmc_alloc_card+0x38/0xb0 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;0000000004adcbf6\u0026gt;] mmc_sdio_init_card+0xde/0x170 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;000000007538fea0\u0026gt;] mmc_attach_sdio+0xcb/0x1b0 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000d4fdeba7\u0026gt;] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 [mmc_core]\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff888112511000 (size 2048):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/3:2\u0026quot;, pid 65, jiffies 4294741623 (age 124.766s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 40 51 12 81 88 ff ff e0 58 8d 06 81 88 ff ff .@Q......X......\n 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff 10 10 51 12 81 88 ff ff ..Q.......Q.....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009e5931da\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x21/0x110\n [\u0026lt;00000000fcbe706c\u0026gt;] sdio_alloc_func+0x35/0x100 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000c68f4b50\u0026gt;] mmc_attach_sdio.cold.18+0xb1/0x395 [mmc_core]\n [\u0026lt;00000000d4fdeba7\u0026gt;] mmc_rescan+0x54a/0x640 [mmc_core](CVE-2023-52730)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel through 6.7.1, there is a use-after-free in cec_queue_msg_fh, related to drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c and drivers/media/cec/core/cec-api.c.(CVE-2024-23848)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngenirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline\r\n\r\nThe absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of\ninterrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is\ndeferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the\noriginal CPU.\r\n\r\nWhen the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is\nenforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,\nbut the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately\nreclaimed. Instead, apicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming\nprocess is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nUpon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU,\nirq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU\u0026apos;s vector_cleanup list if it\nremains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its\nvector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.\r\n\r\nHowever, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the\ninterrupt triggers again on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nIn that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU\nto reclaim the old apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector because the interrupt isn\u0026apos;t currently\naffine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even\nthough __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it\ndoesn\u0026apos;t reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress and apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector to 0.\r\n\r\nAs a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a\nCPU vector leak.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move()\nbefore the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector, if the\ninterrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well,\nfollowing a warning message, although theoretically it should never see\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress with apicd-\u0026gt;prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: act_skbmod: prevent kernel-infoleak\r\n\r\nsyzbot found that tcf_skbmod_dump() was copying four bytes\nfrom kernel stack to user space [1].\r\n\r\nThe issue here is that \u0026apos;struct tc_skbmod\u0026apos; has a four bytes hole.\r\n\r\nWe need to clear the structure before filling fields.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline]\n simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline]\n __skb_datagram_iter+0x185/0x1000 net/core/datagram.c:420\n skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5c/0x200 net/core/datagram.c:546\n skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4050 [inline]\n netlink_recvmsg+0x432/0x1610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1962\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068\n __sys_recvfrom+0x35a/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2242\n __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2256 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x126/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2256\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n pskb_expand_head+0x30f/0x19d0 net/core/skbuff.c:2253\n netlink_trim+0x2c2/0x330 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317\n netlink_unicast+0x9f/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1351\n nlmsg_unicast include/net/netlink.h:1144 [inline]\n nlmsg_notify+0x21d/0x2f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2610\n rtnetlink_send+0x73/0x90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:741\n rtnetlink_maybe_send include/linux/rtnetlink.h:17 [inline]\n tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2048 [inline]\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x146e/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2559\n rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6613\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xf4c/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10df/0x11f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n __nla_put lib/nlattr.c:1041 [inline]\n nla_put+0x1c6/0x230 lib/nlattr.c:1099\n tcf_skbmod_dump+0x23f/0xc20 net/sched/act_skbmod.c:256\n tcf_action_dump_old net/sched/act_api.c:1191 [inline]\n tcf_action_dump_1+0x85e/0x970 net/sched/act_api.c:1227\n tcf_action_dump+0x1fd/0x460 net/sched/act_api.c:1251\n tca_get_fill+0x519/0x7a0 net/sched/act_api.c:1628\n tcf_add_notify_msg net/sched/act_api.c:2023 [inline]\n tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2042 [inline]\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x1365/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netli\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1][2]:\r\n\r\nnci_rx_work() parses and processes received packet. When the payload\nlength is zero, each message type handler reads uninitialized payload\nand KMSAN detects this issue. The receipt of a packet with a zero-size\npayload is considered unexpected, and therefore, such packets should be\nsilently discarded.\r\n\r\nThis patch resolved this issue by checking payload size before calling\neach message type handler codes.(CVE-2024-35915)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/arm/malidp: fix a possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn malidp_mw_connector_reset, new memory is allocated with kzalloc, but\nno check is performed. In order to prevent null pointer dereferencing,\nensure that mw_state is checked before calling\n__drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset.(CVE-2024-36014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\namd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted\r\n\r\nIf there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first\ndevice will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes\non all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will\nstart reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been\nevicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page\nfault.(CVE-2024-36949)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in dctcp_update_alpha().\r\n\r\nIn dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g\nas follows:\r\n\r\n alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha \u0026gt;\u0026gt; dctcp_shift_g);\n ...\n delivered_ce \u0026lt;\u0026lt;= (10 - dctcp_shift_g);\r\n\r\nIt seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered\nshift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g:\r\n\r\n memcpy((void*)0x20000080,\n \u0026quot;/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\\000\u0026quot;, 47);\n res = syscall(__NR_openat, /*fd=*/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /*file=*/0x20000080ul,\n /*flags=*/2ul, /*mode=*/0ul);\n memcpy((void*)0x20000000, \u0026quot;100\\000\u0026quot;, 4);\n syscall(__NR_write, /*fd=*/r[0], /*val=*/0x20000000ul, /*len=*/4ul);\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax().\r\n\r\nWith this patch:\r\n\r\n # echo 10 \u0026gt; /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n 10\n # echo 11 \u0026gt; /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument\r\n\r\n[0]:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12\nshift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type \u0026apos;u32\u0026apos; (aka \u0026apos;unsigned int\u0026apos;)\nCPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468\n dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143\n tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline]\n tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948\n tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711\n tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937\n sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline]\n __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983\n release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549\n mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907\n mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976\n __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072\n mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127\n inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437\n __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]\n sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421\n __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422\n task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]\n do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878\n do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027\n __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline]\n __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline]\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c.\nRSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0\nR10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0\nR13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-37356)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn vc4_hdmi_audio_init() of_get_address() may return\nNULL which is later dereferenced. Fix this bug by adding NULL check.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38546)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks\r\n\r\nThere is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the\ncommit ac0a230f719b (\u0026quot;eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid\ndeadlocks\u0026quot;). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic\ncontext and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface\nof sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing\nthe implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have\nthe same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the\n.ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver,\nso fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device\r\n\r\nThere is a reference count leak issue of the object \u0026quot;net_device\u0026quot; in\nax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the\nax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one\nor zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will\ncause memory leak.\r\n\r\nIn order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of\nnet_device after dev-\u0026gt;ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qedf: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a count-sized kernel buffer and copy count from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use kstrtouint on this buffer but we\ndon\u0026apos;t ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can\nlead to OOB read when using kstrtouint. Fix this issue by using\nmemdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38559)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\r\n\r\nThe \u0026apos;TAG 66 Packet Format\u0026apos; description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\r\n\r\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\r\n\r\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8(CVE-2024-38578)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic\r\n\r\nIn spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len\ninstead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the\nbuffer boundaries.\nFix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()\r\n\r\nSyzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called\nduring nilfs2 unmount.\r\n\r\nAnalysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which\nsynchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after\nnilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace\nbelow:\r\n\r\nnilfs_detach_log_writer\n nilfs_segctor_destroy\n nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --\u0026gt; Shut down log writer thread\n flush_work\n nilfs_iput_work_func\n nilfs_dispose_list\n iput\n nilfs_evict_inode\n nilfs_transaction_commit\n nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync)\n nilfs_segctor_sync --\u0026gt; Attempt to synchronize with\n log writer thread\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\nFix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer\nthread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by\nforcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread\nterminates.\r\n\r\nThe skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the\nsubsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;nilfs2: fix log writer related issues\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nThis bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues,\nincluding a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on\nunmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found\nduring their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.\r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 3):\r\n\r\nA use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on\nthe nilfs_sc_info structure.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log\nwriter thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure\nis about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread\u0026apos;s lifetime.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer\nthread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time\r\n\r\nCurrently ALSA timer doesn\u0026apos;t have the lower limit of the start tick\ntime, and it allows a very small size, e.g. 1 tick with 1ns resolution\nfor hrtimer. Such a situation may lead to an unexpected RCU stall,\nwhere the callback repeatedly queuing the expire update, as reported\nby fuzzer.\r\n\r\nThis patch introduces a sanity check of the timer start tick time, so\nthat the system returns an error when a too small start size is set.\nAs of this patch, the lower limit is hard-coded to 100us, which is\nsmall enough but can still work somehow.(CVE-2024-38618)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal\r\n\r\nThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal of\nthe driver. However, code doesn\u0026apos;t update the respective global\nvariable and after insmod \u2014 rmmod \u2014 insmod cycle the kernel\noopses:\r\n\r\n max3100 spi-PRP0001:01: max3100_probe: adding port 0\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000408\n ...\n RIP: 0010:serial_core_register_port+0xa0/0x840\n ...\n max3100_probe+0x1b6/0x280 [max3100]\n spi_probe+0x8d/0xb0\r\n\r\nUpdate the actual state so next time UART driver will be registered\nagain.\r\n\r\nHugo also noticed, that the error path in the probe also affected\nby having the variable set, and not cleared. Instead of clearing it\nmove the assignment after the successfull uart_register_driver() call.(CVE-2024-38633)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Lock port-\u0026gt;lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()\r\n\r\nuart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken,\nSince we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at\nthe time of running. Make sure that it\u0026apos;s taken by explicitly doing\nthat. Without it we got a splat:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100]\n RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100]\n max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 [max3100](CVE-2024-38634)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode\r\n\r\nIf channel for the given node is not found we return null from\nget_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer\nbefore using it in two of the missing places.\r\n\r\nThis was originally reported in [0]:\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nenic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port\r\n\r\nenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes\nIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.\nThese attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)\nusing the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE\nas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and\nIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation\nusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact\nsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that\nenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands\nread access in the memcpys of the data of these\nattributes in enic_set_vf_port.(CVE-2024-38659)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma-buf/sw-sync: don\u0026apos;t enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()\r\n\r\nSince commit a6aa8fca4d79 (\u0026quot;dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from\nknown context\u0026quot;) by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with\nspin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite\nsync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains\ninconsistent lock state warning.\r\n\r\nUse plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for\nsync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()\r\n\r\nSyzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\n p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598\n __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]\n alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline]\n allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline]\n new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391\n ___slab_alloc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525\n __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline]\n __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852\n p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline]\n p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641\n p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nIf p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req-\u0026gt;rc.tag\nwill not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res()\nends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc()\nfinishes.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields\nsuch as \u0026apos;tag\u0026apos; and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) \u0026apos;id\u0026apos;\nduring the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1835",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:18Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T11:07:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1835"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47270"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47515"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47583"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47611"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48717"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48722"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48736"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48738"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48743"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48758"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39301"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47270",
"CVE-2021-47515",
"CVE-2021-47583",
"CVE-2021-47611",
"CVE-2021-47619",
"CVE-2022-48717",
"CVE-2022-48722",
"CVE-2022-48736",
"CVE-2022-48738",
"CVE-2022-48743",
"CVE-2022-48744",
"CVE-2022-48758",
"CVE-2022-48772",
"CVE-2023-52730",
"CVE-2024-23848",
"CVE-2024-31076",
"CVE-2024-35893",
"CVE-2024-35915",
"CVE-2024-36014",
"CVE-2024-36949",
"CVE-2024-37356",
"CVE-2024-38546",
"CVE-2024-38553",
"CVE-2024-38554",
"CVE-2024-38559",
"CVE-2024-38578",
"CVE-2024-38579",
"CVE-2024-38582",
"CVE-2024-38583",
"CVE-2024-38618",
"CVE-2024-38633",
"CVE-2024-38634",
"CVE-2024-38637",
"CVE-2024-38659",
"CVE-2024-38780",
"CVE-2024-39301"
]
}
OESA-2024-1894 (CVE-2021-47432)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-07-26 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don't overflow in peek()
When we started spreading new inode numbers throughout most of the 64 bit inode space, that triggered some corner case bugs, in particular some integer overflows related to the radix tree code. Oops.(CVE-2021-47432)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler
The following deadlock has been observed on a test setup:
-
All tags allocated
-
The SCSI error handler calls ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler()
-
ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() queues work that calls ufshcd_err_handler()
-
ufshcd_err_handler() locks up as follows:
Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler.cfi_jt Call trace: __switch_to+0x298/0x5d8 __schedule+0x6cc/0xa94 schedule+0x12c/0x298 blk_mq_get_tag+0x210/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_request+0x1c8/0x284 blk_get_request+0x74/0x134 ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd+0x68/0x640 ufshcd_verify_dev_init+0x68/0x35c ufshcd_probe_hba+0x12c/0x1cb8 ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x88/0x254 ufshcd_reset_and_restore+0xd0/0x354 ufshcd_err_handler+0x408/0xc58 process_one_work+0x24c/0x66c worker_thread+0x3e8/0xa4c kthread+0x150/0x1b4 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
Fix this lockup by making ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() allocate a reserved request.(CVE-2021-47622)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dsa: seville: register the mdiobus under devres
As explained in commits: 74b6d7d13307 ("net: dsa: realtek: register the MDIO bus under devres") 5135e96a3dd2 ("net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres")
mdiobus_free() will panic when called from devm_mdiobus_free() <- devres_release_all() <- __device_release_driver(), and that mdiobus was not previously unregistered.
The Seville VSC9959 switch is a platform device, so the initial set of constraints that I thought would cause this (I2C or SPI buses which call ->remove on ->shutdown) do not apply. But there is one more which applies here.
If the DSA master itself is on a bus that calls ->remove from ->shutdown (like dpaa2-eth, which is on the fsl-mc bus), there is a device link between the switch and the DSA master, and device_links_unbind_consumers() will unbind the seville switch driver on shutdown.
So the same treatment must be applied to all DSA switch drivers, which is: either use devres for both the mdiobus allocation and registration, or don't use devres at all.
The seville driver has a code structure that could accommodate both the mdiobus_unregister and mdiobus_free calls, but it has an external dependency upon mscc_miim_setup() from mdio-mscc-miim.c, which calls devm_mdiobus_alloc_size() on its behalf. So rather than restructuring that, and exporting yet one more symbol mscc_miim_teardown(), let's work with devres and replace of_mdiobus_register with the devres variant. When we use all-devres, we can ensure that devres doesn't free a still-registered bus (it either runs both callbacks, or none).(CVE-2022-48814)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: lock against ->sock changing during sysfs read
->sock can be set to NULL asynchronously unless ->recv_mutex is held. So it is important to hold that mutex. Otherwise a sysfs read can trigger an oops. Commit 17f09d3f619a ("SUNRPC: Check if the xprt is connected before handling sysfs reads") appears to attempt to fix this problem, but it only narrows the race window.(CVE-2022-48816)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_core: Fix leaking sent_cmd skb
sent_cmd memory is not freed before freeing hci_dev causing it to leak it contents.(CVE-2022-48844)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix potential deadlock when releasing mids
All release_mid() callers seem to hold a reference of @mid so there is no need to call kref_put(&mid->refcount, __release_mid) under @server->mid_lock spinlock. If they don't, then an use-after-free bug would have occurred anyways.
By getting rid of such spinlock also fixes a potential deadlock as shown below
CPU 0 CPU 1
cifs_demultiplex_thread() cifs_debug_data_proc_show() release_mid() spin_lock(&server->mid_lock); spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock) spin_lock(&server->mid_lock) __release_mid() smb2_find_smb_tcon() spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock) deadlock(CVE-2023-52757)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: config: fix iteration issue in 'usb_get_bos_descriptor()'
The BOS descriptor defines a root descriptor and is the base descriptor for accessing a family of related descriptors.
Function 'usb_get_bos_descriptor()' encounters an iteration issue when skipping the 'USB_DT_DEVICE_CAPABILITY' descriptor type. This results in the same descriptor being read repeatedly.
To address this issue, a 'goto' statement is introduced to ensure that the pointer and the amount read is updated correctly. This ensures that the function iterates to the next descriptor instead of reading the same descriptor repeatedly.(CVE-2023-52781)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
keys: Fix overwrite of key expiration on instantiation
The expiry time of a key is unconditionally overwritten during instantiation, defaulting to turn it permanent. This causes a problem for DNS resolution as the expiration set by user-space is overwritten to TIME64_MAX, disabling further DNS updates. Fix this by restoring the condition that key_set_expiry is only called when the pre-parser sets a specific expiry.(CVE-2024-36031)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: Handle error of rpc_proc_register() in nfs_net_init().
syzkaller reported a warning [0] triggered while destroying immature netns.
rpc_proc_register() was called in init_nfs_fs(), but its error has been ignored since at least the initial commit 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2").
Recently, commit d47151b79e32 ("nfs: expose /proc/net/sunrpc/nfs in net namespaces") converted the procfs to per-netns and made the problem more visible.
Even when rpc_proc_register() fails, nfs_net_init() could succeed, and thus nfs_net_exit() will be called while destroying the netns.
Then, remove_proc_entry() will be called for non-existing proc directory and trigger the warning below.
Let's handle the error of rpc_proc_register() properly in nfs_net_init().
[0]: name 'nfs' WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1710 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x1bb/0x2d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 1710 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-12822-gcd51db110a7e #12 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x1bb/0x2d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Code: 41 5d 41 5e c3 e8 85 09 b5 ff 48 c7 c7 88 58 64 86 e8 09 0e 71 02 e8 74 09 b5 ff 4c 89 e6 48 c7 c7 de 1b 80 84 e8 c5 ad 97 ff <0f> 0b eb b1 e8 5c 09 b5 ff 48 c7 c7 88 58 64 86 e8 e0 0d 71 02 eb RSP: 0018:ffffc9000c6d7ce0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880422b8b00 RCX: ffffffff8110503c RDX: ffff888030652f00 RSI: ffffffff81105045 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffff81bb62cb R12: ffffffff84807ffc R13: ffff88804ad6fcc0 R14: ffffffff84807ffc R15: ffffffff85741ff8 FS: 00007f30cfba8640(0000) GS:ffff88807dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ff51afe8000 CR3: 000000005a60a005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> rpc_proc_unregister+0x64/0x70 net/sunrpc/stats.c:310 nfs_net_exit+0x1c/0x30 fs/nfs/inode.c:2438 ops_exit_list+0x62/0xb0 net/core/net_namespace.c:170 setup_net+0x46c/0x660 net/core/net_namespace.c:372 copy_net_ns+0x244/0x590 net/core/net_namespace.c:505 create_new_namespaces+0x2ed/0x770 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xae/0x160 kernel/nsproxy.c:228 ksys_unshare+0x342/0x760 kernel/fork.c:3322 __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3393 [inline] __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3391 [inline] __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 kernel/fork.c:3391 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e RIP: 0033:0x7f30d0febe5d Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 9f 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f30cfba7cc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000110 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004bbf80 RCX: 00007f30d0febe5d RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000006c020600 RBP: 00000000004bbf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f30d104c530 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK>(CVE-2024-36939)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qedf: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a count-sized kernel buffer and copy count from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use kstrtouint on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using kstrtouint. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38559)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events in an event_group is greater than HNS3_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS, the memory write overflow of event_group array occurs.
Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation, and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.
There are 9 different events in an event_group. [1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}(CVE-2024-38568)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ecryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet
The 'TAG 66 Packet Format' description is missing the cipher code and checksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result, the buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and write_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the buffer.
Fix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet will always fit in the buffer.
This fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181
CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70 print_report+0xc5/0x610 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 kasan_report+0xc2/0x110 ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 __asan_store1+0x62/0x80 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10 ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540 ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d] ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10 ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30 ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67 Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67 RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040 </TASK>
Allocated by task 181: kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40 __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x66/0x160 ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0 ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550 ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150 ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0 path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0 do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290 do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160 __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8(CVE-2024-38578)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()
syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1]
Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node)
[1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted
syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697
but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f70 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-38589)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time
Currently ALSA timer doesn't have the lower limit of the start tick time, and it allows a very small size, e.g. 1 tick with 1ns resolution for hrtimer. Such a situation may lead to an unexpected RCU stall, where the callback repeatedly queuing the expire update, as reported by fuzzer.
This patch introduces a sanity check of the timer start tick time, so that the system returns an error when a too small start size is set. As of this patch, the lower limit is hard-coded to 100us, which is small enough but can still work somehow.(CVE-2024-38618)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb-storage: alauda: Check whether the media is initialized
The member "uzonesize" of struct alauda_info will remain 0 if alauda_init_media() fails, potentially causing divide errors in alauda_read_data() and alauda_write_lba(). - Add a member "media_initialized" to struct alauda_info. - Change a condition in alauda_check_media() to ensure the first initialization. - Add an error check for the return value of alauda_init_media().(CVE-2024-38619)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix nilfs_empty_dir() misjudgment and long loop on I/O errors
The error handling in nilfs_empty_dir() when a directory folio/page read fails is incorrect, as in the old ext2 implementation, and if the folio/page cannot be read or nilfs_check_folio() fails, it will falsely determine the directory as empty and corrupt the file system.
In addition, since nilfs_empty_dir() does not immediately return on a failed folio/page read, but continues to loop, this can cause a long loop with I/O if i_size of the directory's inode is also corrupted, causing the log writer thread to wait and hang, as reported by syzbot.
Fix these issues by making nilfs_empty_dir() immediately return a false value (0) if it fails to get a directory folio/page.(CVE-2024-39469)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: fix log recovery buffer allocation for the legacy h_size fixup
Commit a70f9fe52daa ("xfs: detect and handle invalid iclog size set by mkfs") added a fixup for incorrect h_size values used for the initial umount record in old xfsprogs versions. Later commit 0c771b99d6c9 ("xfs: clean up calculation of LR header blocks") cleaned up the log reover buffer calculation, but stoped using the fixed up h_size value to size the log recovery buffer, which can lead to an out of bounds access when the incorrect h_size does not come from the old mkfs tool, but a fuzzer.
Fix this by open coding xlog_logrec_hblks and taking the fixed h_size into account for this calculation.(CVE-2024-39472)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ima: Fix use-after-free on a dentry's dname.name
->d_name.name can change on rename and the earlier value can be freed; there are conditions sufficient to stabilize it (->d_lock on dentry, ->d_lock on its parent, ->i_rwsem exclusive on the parent's inode, rename_lock), but none of those are met at any of the sites. Take a stable snapshot of the name instead.(CVE-2024-39494)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vmci: prevent speculation leaks by sanitizing event in event_deliver()
Coverity spotted that event_msg is controlled by user-space, event_msg->event_data.event is passed to event_deliver() and used as an index without sanitization.
This change ensures that the event index is sanitized to mitigate any possibility of speculative information leaks.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.
Only compile tested, no access to HW.(CVE-2024-39499)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/komeda: check for error-valued pointer
komeda_pipeline_get_state() may return an error-valued pointer, thus check the pointer for negative or null value before dereferencing.(CVE-2024-39505)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: class: cdc-wdm: Fix CPU lockup caused by excessive log messages
The syzbot fuzzer found that the interrupt-URB completion callback in the cdc-wdm driver was taking too long, and the driver's immediate resubmission of interrupt URBs with -EPROTO status combined with the dummy-hcd emulation to cause a CPU lockup:
cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: nonzero urb status received: -71 cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: wdm_int_callback - 0 bytes watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [syz-executor782:6625] CPU#0 Utilization every 4s during lockup: #1: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #2: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #3: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #4: 98% system, 0% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle #5: 98% system, 1% softirq, 3% hardirq, 0% idle Modules linked in: irq event stamp: 73096 hardirqs last enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2935 [inline] hardirqs last enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_flush_all+0x650/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994 hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline] hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551 softirqs last enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] softirq_handle_end kernel/softirq.c:400 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] handle_softirqs+0xa60/0xc34 kernel/softirq.c:582 softirqs last disabled at (73043): [<ffff800080020de8>] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20 kernel/softirq.c:588 CPU: 0 PID: 6625 Comm: syz-executor782 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-g8867bbd4a056 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
Testing showed that the problem did not occur if the two error messages -- the first two lines above -- were removed; apparently adding material to the kernel log takes a surprisingly large amount of time.
In any case, the best approach for preventing these lockups and to avoid spamming the log with thousands of error messages per second is to ratelimit the two dev_err() calls. Therefore we replace them with dev_err_ratelimited().(CVE-2024-40904)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fix possible race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from()
syzbot found a race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from() [1]
If compiler reads more than once (*ppcpu_rt), second read could read NULL, if another cpu clears the value in rt6_get_pcpu_route().
Add a READ_ONCE() to prevent this race.
Also add rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() because we rely on RCU protection while dereferencing pcpu_rt.
[1]
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000012: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097] CPU: 0 PID: 7543 Comm: kworker/u8:17 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-00013-g2bfcfd584ff5 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net RIP: 0010:__fib6_drop_pcpu_from.part.0+0x10a/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:984 Code: f8 48 c1 e8 03 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 16 02 00 00 4d 8b 3f 4d 85 ff 74 31 e8 74 a7 fa f7 49 8d bf 90 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <80> 3c 28 00 0f 85 1e 02 00 00 49 8b 87 90 00 00 00 48 8b 0c 24 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900040df070 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff89932e16 RDX: ffff888049dd1e00 RSI: ffffffff89932d7c RDI: 0000000000000091 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000007 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88807fa080b8 R13: fffffbfff1a9a07d R14: ffffed100ff41022 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b32c26000 CR3: 000000005d56e000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:966 [inline] fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1027 [inline] fib6_purge_rt+0x7f2/0x9f0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1038 fib6_del_route net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1998 [inline] fib6_del+0xa70/0x17b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2043 fib6_clean_node+0x426/0x5b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2205 fib6_walk_continue+0x44f/0x8d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2127 fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2175 fib6_clean_tree+0xd7/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2255 __fib6_clean_all+0x100/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2271 rt6_sync_down_dev net/ipv6/route.c:4906 [inline] rt6_disable_ip+0x7ed/0xa00 net/ipv6/route.c:4911 addrconf_ifdown.isra.0+0x117/0x1b40 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3855 addrconf_notify+0x223/0x19e0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3778 notifier_call_chain+0xb9/0x410 kernel/notifier.c:93 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xbe/0x140 net/core/dev.c:1992 call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2030 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2044 [inline] dev_close_many+0x333/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:1585 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x46d/0x19f0 net/core/dev.c:11193 unregister_netdevice_many net/core/dev.c:11276 [inline] default_device_exit_batch+0x85b/0xae0 net/core/dev.c:11759 ops_exit_list+0x128/0x180 net/core/net_namespace.c:178 cleanup_net+0x5b7/0xbf0 net/core/net_namespace.c:640 process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline] worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: Fix deadlock in ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup()
The ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup() function takes sta->ps_lock to synchronizes with ieee80211_tx_h_unicast_ps_buf() which is called from softirq context. However using only spin_lock() to get sta->ps_lock in ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup() does not prevent softirq to execute on this same CPU, to run ieee80211_tx_h_unicast_ps_buf() and try to take this same lock ending in deadlock. Below is an example of rcu stall that arises in such situation.
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 2-....: (42413413 ticks this GP) idle=b154/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1763/1765 fqs=21206996 rcu: (t=42586894 jiffies g=2057 q=362405 ncpus=4) CPU: 2 PID: 719 Comm: wpa_supplicant Tainted: G W 6.4.0-02158-g1b062f552873 #742 Hardware name: RPT (r1) (DT) pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x58/0x2d0 lr : invoke_tx_handlers_early+0x5b4/0x5c0 sp : ffff00001ef64660 x29: ffff00001ef64660 x28: ffff000009bc1070 x27: ffff000009bc0ad8 x26: ffff000009bc0900 x25: ffff00001ef647a8 x24: 0000000000000000 x23: ffff000009bc0900 x22: ffff000009bc0900 x21: ffff00000ac0e000 x20: ffff00000a279e00 x19: ffff00001ef646e8 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: ffff800016468000 x16: ffff00001ef608c0 x15: 0010533c93f64f80 x14: 0010395c9faa3946 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000fa83b2da x11: 000000012edeceea x10: ffff0000010fbe00 x9 : 0000000000895440 x8 : 000000000010533c x7 : ffff00000ad8b740 x6 : ffff00000c350880 x5 : 0000000000000007 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ffff00000ac0e0e8 Call trace: queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x58/0x2d0 ieee80211_tx+0x80/0x12c ieee80211_tx_pending+0x110/0x278 tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x10c/0x144 tasklet_action+0x20/0x28 _stext+0x11c/0x284 _dosoftirq+0xc/0x14 call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x34 do_softirq_own_stack+0x18/0x20 do_softirq+0x74/0x7c local_bh_enable_ip+0xa0/0xa4 _ieee80211_wake_txqs+0x3b0/0x4b8 __ieee80211_wake_queue+0x12c/0x168 ieee80211_add_pending_skbs+0xec/0x138 ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup+0x2a4/0x480 ieee80211_mps_sta_status_update.part.0+0xd8/0x11c ieee80211_mps_sta_status_update+0x18/0x24 sta_apply_parameters+0x3bc/0x4c0 ieee80211_change_station+0x1b8/0x2dc nl80211_set_station+0x444/0x49c genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xa4/0xfc genl_rcv_msg+0x1b0/0x244 netlink_rcv_skb+0x38/0x10c genl_rcv+0x34/0x48 netlink_unicast+0x254/0x2bc netlink_sendmsg+0x190/0x3b4 _syssendmsg+0x1e8/0x218 _sys_sendmsg+0x68/0x8c __sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x84 __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x20/0x28 do_el0_svc+0x6c/0xe8 el0_svc+0x14/0x48 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb4 el0t_64_sync+0x14c/0x150
Using spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() instead prevents softirq to raise on the same CPU that is holding the lock.(CVE-2024-40912)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: check n_ssids before accessing the ssids
In some versions of cfg80211, the ssids poinet might be a valid one even though n_ssids is 0. Accessing the pointer in this case will cuase an out-of-bound access. Fix this by checking n_ssids first.(CVE-2024-40929)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/exynos/vidi: fix memory leak in .get_modes()
The duplicated EDID is never freed. Fix it.(CVE-2024-40932)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don't read past the mfuart notifcation
In case the firmware sends a notification that claims it has more data than it has, we will read past that was allocated for the notification. Remove the print of the buffer, we won't see it by default. If needed, we can see the content with tracing.
This was reported by KFENCE.(CVE-2024-40941)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix races between hole punching and AIO+DIO
After commit "ocfs2: return real error code in ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block", fstests/generic/300 become from always failed to sometimes failed:
======================================================================== [ 473.293420 ] run fstests generic/300
[ 475.296983 ] JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal [ 475.302473 ] ocfs2: Mounting device (253,1) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode. [ 494.290998 ] OCFS2: ERROR (device dm-1): ocfs2_change_extent_flag: Owner 5668 has an extent at cpos 78723 which can no longer be found [ 494.291609 ] On-disk corruption discovered. Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the filesystem is unmounted. [ 494.292018 ] OCFS2: File system is now read-only. [ 494.292224 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_mark_extent_written:5272 ERROR: status = -30 [ 494.292602 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_dio_end_io_write:2374 ERROR: status = -3 fio: io_u error on file /mnt/scratch/racer: Read-only file system: write offset=460849152, buflen=131072 =========================================================================
In __blockdev_direct_IO, ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block is called to add unwritten extents to a list. extents are also inserted into extent tree in ocfs2_write_begin_nolock. Then another thread call fallocate to puch a hole at one of the unwritten extent. The extent at cpos was removed by ocfs2_remove_extent(). At end io worker thread, ocfs2_search_extent_list found there is no such extent at the cpos.
T1 T2 T3
inode lock
...
insert extents
...
inode unlock
ocfs2_fallocate __ocfs2_change_file_space inode lock lock ip_alloc_sem ocfs2_remove_inode_range inode ocfs2_remove_btree_range ocfs2_remove_extent ^---remove the extent at cpos 78723 ... unlock ip_alloc_sem inode unlock ocfs2_dio_end_io ocfs2_dio_end_io_write lock ip_alloc_sem ocfs2_mark_extent_written ocfs2_change_extent_flag ocfs2_search_extent_list ^---failed to find extent ... unlock ip_alloc_sem
In most filesystems, fallocate is not compatible with racing with AIO+DIO, so fix it by adding to wait for all dio before fallocate/punch_hole like ext4.(CVE-2024-40943)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
MIPS: Octeon: Add PCIe link status check
The standard PCIe configuration read-write interface is used to access the configuration space of the peripheral PCIe devices of the mips processor after the PCIe link surprise down, it can generate kernel panic caused by "Data bus error". So it is necessary to add PCIe link status check for system protection. When the PCIe link is down or in training, assigning a value of 0 to the configuration address can prevent read-write behavior to the configuration space of peripheral PCIe devices, thereby preventing kernel panic.(CVE-2024-40968)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size
plpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to provide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this is communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has no idea.
For example, if I write a bug like this:
long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...);
This compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack corruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end of the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not found a real instance yet.)
To make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized array parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall APIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now provokes a diagnostic like this:
error: array argument is too small; is of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, | ^ ~~~~~~
[1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit 0da6e5fd6c37 ("gcc: disable '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-13 too") and related changes.(CVE-2024-40974)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: force a dst refcount before doing decryption
As it says in commit 3bc07321ccc2 ("xfrm: Force a dst refcount before entering the xfrm type handlers"):
"Crypto requests might return asynchronous. In this case we leave the rcu protected region, so force a refcount on the skb's destination entry before we enter the xfrm type input/output handlers."
On TIPC decryption path it has the same problem, and skb_dst_force() should be called before doing decryption to avoid a possible crash.
Shuang reported this issue when this warning is triggered:
[] WARNING: include/net/dst.h:337 tipc_sk_rcv+0x1055/0x1ea0 [tipc] [] Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W --------- - - 4.18.0-496.el8.x86_64+debug [] Workqueue: crypto cryptd_queue_worker [] RIP: 0010:tipc_sk_rcv+0x1055/0x1ea0 [tipc] [] Call Trace: [] tipc_sk_mcast_rcv+0x548/0xea0 [tipc] [] tipc_rcv+0xcf5/0x1060 [tipc] [] tipc_aead_decrypt_done+0x215/0x2e0 [tipc] [] cryptd_aead_crypt+0xdb/0x190 [] cryptd_queue_worker+0xed/0x190 [] process_one_work+0x93d/0x17e0(CVE-2024-40983)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPICA: Revert "ACPICA: avoid Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is fine."
Undo the modifications made in commit d410ee5109a1 ("ACPICA: avoid "Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is fine.""). The initial purpose of this commit was to stop memory mappings for operation regions from overlapping page boundaries, as it can trigger warnings if different page attributes are present.
However, it was found that when this situation arises, mapping continues until the boundary's end, but there is still an attempt to read/write the entire length of the map, leading to a NULL pointer deference. For example, if a four-byte mapping request is made but only one byte is mapped because it hits the current page boundary's end, a four-byte read/write attempt is still made, resulting in a NULL pointer deference.
Instead, map the entire length, as the ACPI specification does not mandate that it must be within the same page boundary. It is permissible for it to be mapped across different regions.(CVE-2024-40984)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix UBSAN warning in kv_dpm.c
Adds bounds check for sumo_vid_mapping_entry.(CVE-2024-40987)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing: Build event generation tests only as modules
The kprobes and synth event generation test modules add events and lock (get a reference) those event file reference in module init function, and unlock and delete it in module exit function. This is because those are designed for playing as modules.
If we make those modules as built-in, those events are left locked in the kernel, and never be removed. This causes kprobe event self-test failure as below.
[ 97.349708] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 97.353453] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:2133 kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480 [ 97.357106] Modules linked in: [ 97.358488] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-g699646734ab5-dirty #14 [ 97.361556] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 97.363880] RIP: 0010:kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480 [ 97.365538] Code: a8 24 08 82 e9 ae fd ff ff 90 0f 0b 90 48 c7 c7 e5 aa 0b 82 e9 ee fc ff ff 90 0f 0b 90 48 c7 c7 2d 61 06 82 e9 8e fd ff ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 48 c7 c7 33 0b 0c 82 89 c6 e8 6e 03 1f ff 41 ff c7 e9 90 [ 97.370429] RSP: 0000:ffffc90000013b50 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 97.371852] RAX: 00000000fffffff0 RBX: ffff888005919c00 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 97.373829] RDX: ffff888003f40000 RSI: ffffffff8236a598 RDI: ffff888003f40a68 [ 97.375715] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 97.377675] R10: ffffffff811c9ae5 R11: ffffffff8120c4e0 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 97.379591] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000015 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 97.381536] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88807dcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 97.383813] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 97.385449] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000002244000 CR4: 00000000000006b0 [ 97.387347] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 97.389277] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 97.391196] Call Trace: [ 97.391967] <TASK> [ 97.392647] ? __warn+0xcc/0x180 [ 97.393640] ? kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480 [ 97.395181] ? report_bug+0xbd/0x150 [ 97.396234] ? handle_bug+0x3e/0x60 [ 97.397311] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50 [ 97.398434] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 97.399652] ? trace_kprobe_is_busy+0x20/0x20 [ 97.400904] ? tracing_reset_all_online_cpus+0x15/0x90 [ 97.402304] ? kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480 [ 97.403773] ? init_kprobe_trace+0x50/0x50 [ 97.404972] do_one_initcall+0x112/0x240 [ 97.406113] do_initcall_level+0x95/0xb0 [ 97.407286] ? kernel_init+0x1a/0x1a0 [ 97.408401] do_initcalls+0x3f/0x70 [ 97.409452] kernel_init_freeable+0x16f/0x1e0 [ 97.410662] ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 97.411738] kernel_init+0x1a/0x1a0 [ 97.412788] ret_from_fork+0x39/0x50 [ 97.413817] ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 97.414844] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 97.416285] </TASK> [ 97.417134] irq event stamp: 13437323 [ 97.418376] hardirqs last enabled at (13437337): [<ffffffff8110bc0c>] console_unlock+0x11c/0x150 [ 97.421285] hardirqs last disabled at (13437370): [<ffffffff8110bbf1>] console_unlock+0x101/0x150 [ 97.423838] softirqs last enabled at (13437366): [<ffffffff8108e17f>] handle_softirqs+0x23f/0x2a0 [ 97.426450] softirqs last disabled at (13437393): [<ffffffff8108e346>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x66/0xd0 [ 97.428850] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
And also, since we can not cleanup dynamic_event file, ftracetest are failed too.
To avoid these issues, build these tests only as modules.(CVE-2024-41004)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netpoll: Fix race condition in netpoll_owner_active
KCSAN detected a race condition in netpoll:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in net_rx_action / netpoll_send_skb
write (marked) to 0xffff8881164168b0 of 4 bytes by interrupt on cpu 10:
net_rx_action (./include/linux/netpoll.h:90 net/core/dev.c:6712 net/core/dev.c:6822)
<snip> read to 0xffff8881164168b0 of 4 bytes by task 1 on cpu 2: netpoll_send_skb (net/core/netpoll.c:319 net/core/netpoll.c:345 net/core/netpoll.c:393) netpoll_send_udp (net/core/netpoll.c:?) <snip> value changed: 0x0000000a -> 0xffffffff
This happens because netpoll_owner_active() needs to check if the current CPU is the owner of the lock, touching napi->poll_owner non atomically. The ->poll_owner field contains the current CPU holding the lock.
Use an atomic read to check if the poll owner is the current CPU.(CVE-2024-41005)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: avoid too many retransmit packets
If a TCP socket is using TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, and the other peer retracted its window to zero, tcp_retransmit_timer() can retransmit a packet every two jiffies (2 ms for HZ=1000), for about 4 minutes after TCP_USER_TIMEOUT has 'expired'.
The fix is to make sure tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out() takes icsk->icsk_user_timeout into account.
Before blamed commit, the socket would not timeout after icsk->icsk_user_timeout, but would use standard exponential backoff for the retransmits.
Also worth noting that before commit e89688e3e978 ("net: tcp: fix unexcepted socket die when snd_wnd is 0"), the issue would last 2 minutes instead of 4.(CVE-2024-41007)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix overrunning reservations in ringbuf
The BPF ring buffer internally is implemented as a power-of-2 sized circular buffer, with two logical and ever-increasing counters: consumer_pos is the consumer counter to show which logical position the consumer consumed the data, and producer_pos which is the producer counter denoting the amount of data reserved by all producers.
Each time a record is reserved, the producer that "owns" the record will successfully advance producer counter. In user space each time a record is read, the consumer of the data advanced the consumer counter once it finished processing. Both counters are stored in separate pages so that from user space, the producer counter is read-only and the consumer counter is read-write.
One aspect that simplifies and thus speeds up the implementation of both producers and consumers is how the data area is mapped twice contiguously back-to-back in the virtual memory, allowing to not take any special measures for samples that have to wrap around at the end of the circular buffer data area, because the next page after the last data page would be first data page again, and thus the sample will still appear completely contiguous in virtual memory.
Each record has a struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr { u32 len; u32 pg_off; } header for
book-keeping the length and offset, and is inaccessible to the BPF program.
Helpers like bpf_ringbuf_reserve() return (void *)hdr + BPF_RINGBUF_HDR_SZ
for the BPF program to use. Bing-Jhong and Muhammad reported that it is however
possible to make a second allocated memory chunk overlapping with the first
chunk and as a result, the BPF program is now able to edit first chunk's
header.
For example, consider the creation of a BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF map with size
of 0x4000. Next, the consumer_pos is modified to 0x3000 /before/ a call to
bpf_ringbuf_reserve() is made. This will allocate a chunk A, which is in
[0x0,0x3008], and the BPF program is able to edit [0x8,0x3008]. Now, lets
allocate a chunk B with size 0x3000. This will succeed because consumer_pos
was edited ahead of time to pass the new_prod_pos - cons_pos > rb->mask
check. Chunk B will be in range [0x3008,0x6010], and the BPF program is able
to edit [0x3010,0x6010]. Due to the ring buffer memory layout mentioned
earlier, the ranges [0x0,0x4000] and [0x4000,0x8000] point to the same data
pages. This means that chunk B at [0x4000,0x4008] is chunk A's header.
bpf_ringbuf_submit() / bpf_ringbuf_discard() use the header's pg_off to then
locate the bpf_ringbuf itself via bpf_ringbuf_restore_from_rec(). Once chunk
B modified chunk A's header, then bpf_ringbuf_commit() refers to the wrong
page and could cause a crash.
Fix it by calculating the oldest pending_pos and check whether the range from the oldest outstanding record to the newest would span beyond the ring buffer size. If that is the case, then reject the request. We've tested with the ring buffer benchmark in BPF selftests (./benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh) before/after the fix and while it seems a bit slower on some benchmarks, it is still not significantly enough to matter.(CVE-2024-41009)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-220.0.0.123.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don\u0026apos;t overflow in peek()\r\n\r\nWhen we started spreading new inode numbers throughout most of the 64\nbit inode space, that triggered some corner case bugs, in particular\nsome integer overflows related to the radix tree code. Oops.(CVE-2021-47432)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler\r\n\r\nThe following deadlock has been observed on a test setup:\r\n\r\n - All tags allocated\r\n\r\n - The SCSI error handler calls ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler()\r\n\r\n - ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() queues work that calls\n ufshcd_err_handler()\r\n\r\n - ufshcd_err_handler() locks up as follows:\r\n\r\nWorkqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler.cfi_jt\nCall trace:\n __switch_to+0x298/0x5d8\n __schedule+0x6cc/0xa94\n schedule+0x12c/0x298\n blk_mq_get_tag+0x210/0x480\n __blk_mq_alloc_request+0x1c8/0x284\n blk_get_request+0x74/0x134\n ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd+0x68/0x640\n ufshcd_verify_dev_init+0x68/0x35c\n ufshcd_probe_hba+0x12c/0x1cb8\n ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x88/0x254\n ufshcd_reset_and_restore+0xd0/0x354\n ufshcd_err_handler+0x408/0xc58\n process_one_work+0x24c/0x66c\n worker_thread+0x3e8/0xa4c\n kthread+0x150/0x1b4\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30\r\n\r\nFix this lockup by making ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() allocate a reserved\nrequest.(CVE-2021-47622)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dsa: seville: register the mdiobus under devres\r\n\r\nAs explained in commits:\n74b6d7d13307 (\u0026quot;net: dsa: realtek: register the MDIO bus under devres\u0026quot;)\n5135e96a3dd2 (\u0026quot;net: dsa: don\u0026apos;t allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nmdiobus_free() will panic when called from devm_mdiobus_free() \u0026lt;-\ndevres_release_all() \u0026lt;- __device_release_driver(), and that mdiobus was\nnot previously unregistered.\r\n\r\nThe Seville VSC9959 switch is a platform device, so the initial set of\nconstraints that I thought would cause this (I2C or SPI buses which call\n-\u0026gt;remove on -\u0026gt;shutdown) do not apply. But there is one more which\napplies here.\r\n\r\nIf the DSA master itself is on a bus that calls -\u0026gt;remove from -\u0026gt;shutdown\n(like dpaa2-eth, which is on the fsl-mc bus), there is a device link\nbetween the switch and the DSA master, and device_links_unbind_consumers()\nwill unbind the seville switch driver on shutdown.\r\n\r\nSo the same treatment must be applied to all DSA switch drivers, which\nis: either use devres for both the mdiobus allocation and registration,\nor don\u0026apos;t use devres at all.\r\n\r\nThe seville driver has a code structure that could accommodate both the\nmdiobus_unregister and mdiobus_free calls, but it has an external\ndependency upon mscc_miim_setup() from mdio-mscc-miim.c, which calls\ndevm_mdiobus_alloc_size() on its behalf. So rather than restructuring\nthat, and exporting yet one more symbol mscc_miim_teardown(), let\u0026apos;s work\nwith devres and replace of_mdiobus_register with the devres variant.\nWhen we use all-devres, we can ensure that devres doesn\u0026apos;t free a\nstill-registered bus (it either runs both callbacks, or none).(CVE-2022-48814)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: lock against -\u0026gt;sock changing during sysfs read\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt;sock can be set to NULL asynchronously unless -\u0026gt;recv_mutex is held.\nSo it is important to hold that mutex. Otherwise a sysfs read can\ntrigger an oops.\nCommit 17f09d3f619a (\u0026quot;SUNRPC: Check if the xprt is connected before\nhandling sysfs reads\u0026quot;) appears to attempt to fix this problem, but it\nonly narrows the race window.(CVE-2022-48816)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: hci_core: Fix leaking sent_cmd skb\r\n\r\nsent_cmd memory is not freed before freeing hci_dev causing it to leak\nit contents.(CVE-2022-48844)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsmb: client: fix potential deadlock when releasing mids\r\n\r\nAll release_mid() callers seem to hold a reference of @mid so there is\nno need to call kref_put(\u0026amp;mid-\u0026gt;refcount, __release_mid) under\n@server-\u0026gt;mid_lock spinlock. If they don\u0026apos;t, then an use-after-free bug\nwould have occurred anyways.\r\n\r\nBy getting rid of such spinlock also fixes a potential deadlock as\nshown below\r\n\r\nCPU 0 CPU 1\n------------------------------------------------------------------\ncifs_demultiplex_thread() cifs_debug_data_proc_show()\n release_mid()\n spin_lock(\u0026amp;server-\u0026gt;mid_lock);\n spin_lock(\u0026amp;cifs_tcp_ses_lock)\n\t\t\t\t spin_lock(\u0026amp;server-\u0026gt;mid_lock)\n __release_mid()\n smb2_find_smb_tcon()\n spin_lock(\u0026amp;cifs_tcp_ses_lock) *deadlock*(CVE-2023-52757)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: config: fix iteration issue in \u0026apos;usb_get_bos_descriptor()\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nThe BOS descriptor defines a root descriptor and is the base descriptor for\naccessing a family of related descriptors.\r\n\r\nFunction \u0026apos;usb_get_bos_descriptor()\u0026apos; encounters an iteration issue when\nskipping the \u0026apos;USB_DT_DEVICE_CAPABILITY\u0026apos; descriptor type. This results in\nthe same descriptor being read repeatedly.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, a \u0026apos;goto\u0026apos; statement is introduced to ensure that the\npointer and the amount read is updated correctly. This ensures that the\nfunction iterates to the next descriptor instead of reading the same\ndescriptor repeatedly.(CVE-2023-52781)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkeys: Fix overwrite of key expiration on instantiation\r\n\r\nThe expiry time of a key is unconditionally overwritten during\ninstantiation, defaulting to turn it permanent. This causes a problem\nfor DNS resolution as the expiration set by user-space is overwritten to\nTIME64_MAX, disabling further DNS updates. Fix this by restoring the\ncondition that key_set_expiry is only called when the pre-parser sets a\nspecific expiry.(CVE-2024-36031)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfs: Handle error of rpc_proc_register() in nfs_net_init().\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported a warning [0] triggered while destroying immature\nnetns.\r\n\r\nrpc_proc_register() was called in init_nfs_fs(), but its error\nhas been ignored since at least the initial commit 1da177e4c3f4\n(\u0026quot;Linux-2.6.12-rc2\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nRecently, commit d47151b79e32 (\u0026quot;nfs: expose /proc/net/sunrpc/nfs\nin net namespaces\u0026quot;) converted the procfs to per-netns and made\nthe problem more visible.\r\n\r\nEven when rpc_proc_register() fails, nfs_net_init() could succeed,\nand thus nfs_net_exit() will be called while destroying the netns.\r\n\r\nThen, remove_proc_entry() will be called for non-existing proc\ndirectory and trigger the warning below.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s handle the error of rpc_proc_register() properly in nfs_net_init().\r\n\r\n[0]:\nname \u0026apos;nfs\u0026apos;\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1710 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x1bb/0x2d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 1710 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-12822-gcd51db110a7e #12\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x1bb/0x2d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711\nCode: 41 5d 41 5e c3 e8 85 09 b5 ff 48 c7 c7 88 58 64 86 e8 09 0e 71 02 e8 74 09 b5 ff 4c 89 e6 48 c7 c7 de 1b 80 84 e8 c5 ad 97 ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b eb b1 e8 5c 09 b5 ff 48 c7 c7 88 58 64 86 e8 e0 0d 71 02 eb\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000c6d7ce0 EFLAGS: 00010286\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880422b8b00 RCX: ffffffff8110503c\nRDX: ffff888030652f00 RSI: ffffffff81105045 RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffff81bb62cb R12: ffffffff84807ffc\nR13: ffff88804ad6fcc0 R14: ffffffff84807ffc R15: ffffffff85741ff8\nFS: 00007f30cfba8640(0000) GS:ffff88807dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007ff51afe8000 CR3: 000000005a60a005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n rpc_proc_unregister+0x64/0x70 net/sunrpc/stats.c:310\n nfs_net_exit+0x1c/0x30 fs/nfs/inode.c:2438\n ops_exit_list+0x62/0xb0 net/core/net_namespace.c:170\n setup_net+0x46c/0x660 net/core/net_namespace.c:372\n copy_net_ns+0x244/0x590 net/core/net_namespace.c:505\n create_new_namespaces+0x2ed/0x770 kernel/nsproxy.c:110\n unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xae/0x160 kernel/nsproxy.c:228\n ksys_unshare+0x342/0x760 kernel/fork.c:3322\n __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3393 [inline]\n __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3391 [inline]\n __x64_sys_unshare+0x1f/0x30 kernel/fork.c:3391\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\nRIP: 0033:0x7f30d0febe5d\nCode: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 9f 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007f30cfba7cc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000110\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004bbf80 RCX: 00007f30d0febe5d\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000006c020600\nRBP: 00000000004bbf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002\nR13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f30d104c530 R15: 0000000000000000\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-36939)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qedf: Ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a count-sized kernel buffer and copy count from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use kstrtouint on this buffer but we\ndon\u0026apos;t ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can\nlead to OOB read when using kstrtouint. Fix this issue by using\nmemdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-38559)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group\r\n\r\nThe perf tool allows users to create event groups through following\ncmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out\nof bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of\nevents in an event_group is greater than HNS3_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS, the\nmemory write overflow of event_group array occurs.\r\n\r\nAdd array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,\nand return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.\r\n\r\nThere are 9 different events in an event_group.\n[1] perf stat -e \u0026apos;{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}(CVE-2024-38568)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\necryptfs: Fix buffer size for tag 66 packet\r\n\r\nThe \u0026apos;TAG 66 Packet Format\u0026apos; description is missing the cipher code and\nchecksum fields that are packed into the message packet. As a result,\nthe buffer allocated for the packet is 3 bytes too small and\nwrite_tag_66_packet() will write up to 3 bytes past the end of the\nbuffer.\r\n\r\nFix this by increasing the size of the allocation so the whole packet\nwill always fit in the buffer.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the below kasan slab-out-of-bounds bug:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n Write of size 1 at addr ffff88800afbb2a5 by task touch/181\r\n\r\n CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: touch Not tainted 6.6.13-gnu #1 4c9534092be820851bb687b82d1f92a426598dc6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2/GNU Guix 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x70\n print_report+0xc5/0x610\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x44/0x210\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n kasan_report+0xc2/0x110\n ? ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n __asan_store1+0x62/0x80\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x7d6/0xde0\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x10/0x10\n ? __alloc_pages+0x2e2/0x540\n ? __pfx_ovl_open+0x10/0x10 [overlay 30837f11141636a8e1793533a02e6e2e885dad1d]\n ? dentry_open+0x8f/0xd0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ? __pfx_ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x10/0x10\n ? ecryptfs_get_lower_file+0x6b/0x190\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n ? __pfx_do_filp_open+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? _raw_spin_lock+0x86/0xf0\n ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10\n ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x30\n ? alloc_fd+0xf4/0x330\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n RIP: 0033:0x7f00a703fd67\n Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 37 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 5b 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 85 00 00 00 48 83 c4 68 5d 41 5c c3 0f 1f\n RSP: 002b:00007ffc088e30b0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc088e3368 RCX: 00007f00a703fd67\n RDX: 0000000000000941 RSI: 00007ffc088e48d7 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c\n RBP: 00007ffc088e48d7 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000941\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc088e48d7 R15: 00007f00a7180040\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 181:\n kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x60\n kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x25/0x40\n __kasan_kmalloc+0xc5/0xd0\n __kmalloc+0x66/0x160\n ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x6d2/0xde0\n ecryptfs_write_metadata+0x30a/0x550\n ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x77/0x150\n ecryptfs_create+0x1c2/0x2f0\n path_openat+0x17cf/0x1ba0\n do_filp_open+0x15e/0x290\n do_sys_openat2+0x122/0x160\n __x64_sys_openat+0xef/0x170\n do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8(CVE-2024-38578)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()\r\n\r\nsyzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1]\r\n\r\nMake sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node)\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted\n------------------------------------------------------\nsyz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8880186e2070 (\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n ffff8880186e2070 (\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline]\n ffff8880186e2070 (\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline]\n ffff8880186e2070 (\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697\r\n\r\nbut task is already holding lock:\n ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline]\n ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697\r\n\r\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}:\n lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754\n __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]\n _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178\n spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline]\n nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355\n nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683\n sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222\n sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #0 (\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}:\n check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]\n check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]\n validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869\n __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137\n lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754\n __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]\n _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178\n spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline]\n nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline]\n nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697\n sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222\n sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nother info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock(nr_node_list_lock);\n lock(\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock);\n lock(nr_node_list_lock);\n lock(\u0026amp;nr_node-\u0026gt;node_lock);\r\n\r\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\n1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129:\n #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline]\n #0: ffffffff8f70\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-38589)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time\r\n\r\nCurrently ALSA timer doesn\u0026apos;t have the lower limit of the start tick\ntime, and it allows a very small size, e.g. 1 tick with 1ns resolution\nfor hrtimer. Such a situation may lead to an unexpected RCU stall,\nwhere the callback repeatedly queuing the expire update, as reported\nby fuzzer.\r\n\r\nThis patch introduces a sanity check of the timer start tick time, so\nthat the system returns an error when a too small start size is set.\nAs of this patch, the lower limit is hard-coded to 100us, which is\nsmall enough but can still work somehow.(CVE-2024-38618)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb-storage: alauda: Check whether the media is initialized\r\n\r\nThe member \u0026quot;uzonesize\u0026quot; of struct alauda_info will remain 0\nif alauda_init_media() fails, potentially causing divide errors\nin alauda_read_data() and alauda_write_lba().\n- Add a member \u0026quot;media_initialized\u0026quot; to struct alauda_info.\n- Change a condition in alauda_check_media() to ensure the\n first initialization.\n- Add an error check for the return value of alauda_init_media().(CVE-2024-38619)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix nilfs_empty_dir() misjudgment and long loop on I/O errors\r\n\r\nThe error handling in nilfs_empty_dir() when a directory folio/page read\nfails is incorrect, as in the old ext2 implementation, and if the\nfolio/page cannot be read or nilfs_check_folio() fails, it will falsely\ndetermine the directory as empty and corrupt the file system.\r\n\r\nIn addition, since nilfs_empty_dir() does not immediately return on a\nfailed folio/page read, but continues to loop, this can cause a long loop\nwith I/O if i_size of the directory\u0026apos;s inode is also corrupted, causing the\nlog writer thread to wait and hang, as reported by syzbot.\r\n\r\nFix these issues by making nilfs_empty_dir() immediately return a false\nvalue (0) if it fails to get a directory folio/page.(CVE-2024-39469)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfs: fix log recovery buffer allocation for the legacy h_size fixup\r\n\r\nCommit a70f9fe52daa (\u0026quot;xfs: detect and handle invalid iclog size set by\nmkfs\u0026quot;) added a fixup for incorrect h_size values used for the initial\numount record in old xfsprogs versions. Later commit 0c771b99d6c9\n(\u0026quot;xfs: clean up calculation of LR header blocks\u0026quot;) cleaned up the log\nreover buffer calculation, but stoped using the fixed up h_size value\nto size the log recovery buffer, which can lead to an out of bounds\naccess when the incorrect h_size does not come from the old mkfs\ntool, but a fuzzer.\r\n\r\nFix this by open coding xlog_logrec_hblks and taking the fixed h_size\ninto account for this calculation.(CVE-2024-39472)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nima: Fix use-after-free on a dentry\u0026apos;s dname.name\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt;d_name.name can change on rename and the earlier value can be freed;\nthere are conditions sufficient to stabilize it (-\u0026gt;d_lock on dentry,\n-\u0026gt;d_lock on its parent, -\u0026gt;i_rwsem exclusive on the parent\u0026apos;s inode,\nrename_lock), but none of those are met at any of the sites. Take a stable\nsnapshot of the name instead.(CVE-2024-39494)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvmci: prevent speculation leaks by sanitizing event in event_deliver()\r\n\r\nCoverity spotted that event_msg is controlled by user-space,\nevent_msg-\u0026gt;event_data.event is passed to event_deliver() and used\nas an index without sanitization.\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the event index is sanitized to mitigate any\npossibility of speculative information leaks.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.\r\n\r\nOnly compile tested, no access to HW.(CVE-2024-39499)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/komeda: check for error-valued pointer\r\n\r\nkomeda_pipeline_get_state() may return an error-valued pointer, thus\ncheck the pointer for negative or null value before dereferencing.(CVE-2024-39505)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: class: cdc-wdm: Fix CPU lockup caused by excessive log messages\r\n\r\nThe syzbot fuzzer found that the interrupt-URB completion callback in\nthe cdc-wdm driver was taking too long, and the driver\u0026apos;s immediate\nresubmission of interrupt URBs with -EPROTO status combined with the\ndummy-hcd emulation to cause a CPU lockup:\r\n\r\ncdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: nonzero urb status received: -71\ncdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: wdm_int_callback - 0 bytes\nwatchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [syz-executor782:6625]\nCPU#0 Utilization every 4s during lockup:\n\t#1: 98% system,\t 0% softirq,\t 3% hardirq,\t 0% idle\n\t#2: 98% system,\t 0% softirq,\t 3% hardirq,\t 0% idle\n\t#3: 98% system,\t 0% softirq,\t 3% hardirq,\t 0% idle\n\t#4: 98% system,\t 0% softirq,\t 3% hardirq,\t 0% idle\n\t#5: 98% system,\t 1% softirq,\t 3% hardirq,\t 0% idle\nModules linked in:\nirq event stamp: 73096\nhardirqs last enabled at (73095): [\u0026lt;ffff80008037bc00\u0026gt;] console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2935 [inline]\nhardirqs last enabled at (73095): [\u0026lt;ffff80008037bc00\u0026gt;] console_flush_all+0x650/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994\nhardirqs last disabled at (73096): [\u0026lt;ffff80008af10b00\u0026gt;] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline]\nhardirqs last disabled at (73096): [\u0026lt;ffff80008af10b00\u0026gt;] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551\nsoftirqs last enabled at (73048): [\u0026lt;ffff8000801ea530\u0026gt;] softirq_handle_end kernel/softirq.c:400 [inline]\nsoftirqs last enabled at (73048): [\u0026lt;ffff8000801ea530\u0026gt;] handle_softirqs+0xa60/0xc34 kernel/softirq.c:582\nsoftirqs last disabled at (73043): [\u0026lt;ffff800080020de8\u0026gt;] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20 kernel/softirq.c:588\nCPU: 0 PID: 6625 Comm: syz-executor782 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-g8867bbd4a056 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\r\n\r\nTesting showed that the problem did not occur if the two error\nmessages -- the first two lines above -- were removed; apparently adding\nmaterial to the kernel log takes a surprisingly large amount of time.\r\n\r\nIn any case, the best approach for preventing these lockups and to\navoid spamming the log with thousands of error messages per second is\nto ratelimit the two dev_err() calls. Therefore we replace them with\ndev_err_ratelimited().(CVE-2024-40904)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fix possible race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from()\r\n\r\nsyzbot found a race in __fib6_drop_pcpu_from() [1]\r\n\r\nIf compiler reads more than once (*ppcpu_rt),\nsecond read could read NULL, if another cpu clears\nthe value in rt6_get_pcpu_route().\r\n\r\nAdd a READ_ONCE() to prevent this race.\r\n\r\nAlso add rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() because\nwe rely on RCU protection while dereferencing pcpu_rt.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000012: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097]\nCPU: 0 PID: 7543 Comm: kworker/u8:17 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-00013-g2bfcfd584ff5 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nWorkqueue: netns cleanup_net\n RIP: 0010:__fib6_drop_pcpu_from.part.0+0x10a/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:984\nCode: f8 48 c1 e8 03 80 3c 28 00 0f 85 16 02 00 00 4d 8b 3f 4d 85 ff 74 31 e8 74 a7 fa f7 49 8d bf 90 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 28 00 0f 85 1e 02 00 00 49 8b 87 90 00 00 00 48 8b 0c 24 48\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900040df070 EFLAGS: 00010206\nRAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff89932e16\nRDX: ffff888049dd1e00 RSI: ffffffff89932d7c RDI: 0000000000000091\nRBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000007\nR10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88807fa080b8\nR13: fffffbfff1a9a07d R14: ffffed100ff41022 R15: 0000000000000001\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b32c26000 CR3: 000000005d56e000 CR4: 00000000003526f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:966 [inline]\n fib6_drop_pcpu_from net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1027 [inline]\n fib6_purge_rt+0x7f2/0x9f0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1038\n fib6_del_route net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1998 [inline]\n fib6_del+0xa70/0x17b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2043\n fib6_clean_node+0x426/0x5b0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2205\n fib6_walk_continue+0x44f/0x8d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2127\n fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2175\n fib6_clean_tree+0xd7/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2255\n __fib6_clean_all+0x100/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2271\n rt6_sync_down_dev net/ipv6/route.c:4906 [inline]\n rt6_disable_ip+0x7ed/0xa00 net/ipv6/route.c:4911\n addrconf_ifdown.isra.0+0x117/0x1b40 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3855\n addrconf_notify+0x223/0x19e0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3778\n notifier_call_chain+0xb9/0x410 kernel/notifier.c:93\n call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xbe/0x140 net/core/dev.c:1992\n call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2030 [inline]\n call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2044 [inline]\n dev_close_many+0x333/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:1585\n unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x46d/0x19f0 net/core/dev.c:11193\n unregister_netdevice_many net/core/dev.c:11276 [inline]\n default_device_exit_batch+0x85b/0xae0 net/core/dev.c:11759\n ops_exit_list+0x128/0x180 net/core/net_namespace.c:178\n cleanup_net+0x5b7/0xbf0 net/core/net_namespace.c:640\n process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393\n kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: Fix deadlock in ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup()\r\n\r\nThe ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup() function takes sta-\u0026gt;ps_lock to\nsynchronizes with ieee80211_tx_h_unicast_ps_buf() which is called from\nsoftirq context. However using only spin_lock() to get sta-\u0026gt;ps_lock in\nieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup() does not prevent softirq to execute\non this same CPU, to run ieee80211_tx_h_unicast_ps_buf() and try to\ntake this same lock ending in deadlock. Below is an example of rcu stall\nthat arises in such situation.\r\n\r\n rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU\n rcu: 2-....: (42413413 ticks this GP) idle=b154/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1763/1765 fqs=21206996\n rcu: (t=42586894 jiffies g=2057 q=362405 ncpus=4)\n CPU: 2 PID: 719 Comm: wpa_supplicant Tainted: G W 6.4.0-02158-g1b062f552873 #742\n Hardware name: RPT (r1) (DT)\n pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x58/0x2d0\n lr : invoke_tx_handlers_early+0x5b4/0x5c0\n sp : ffff00001ef64660\n x29: ffff00001ef64660 x28: ffff000009bc1070 x27: ffff000009bc0ad8\n x26: ffff000009bc0900 x25: ffff00001ef647a8 x24: 0000000000000000\n x23: ffff000009bc0900 x22: ffff000009bc0900 x21: ffff00000ac0e000\n x20: ffff00000a279e00 x19: ffff00001ef646e8 x18: 0000000000000000\n x17: ffff800016468000 x16: ffff00001ef608c0 x15: 0010533c93f64f80\n x14: 0010395c9faa3946 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000fa83b2da\n x11: 000000012edeceea x10: ffff0000010fbe00 x9 : 0000000000895440\n x8 : 000000000010533c x7 : ffff00000ad8b740 x6 : ffff00000c350880\n x5 : 0000000000000007 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000\n x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ffff00000ac0e0e8\n Call trace:\n queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x58/0x2d0\n ieee80211_tx+0x80/0x12c\n ieee80211_tx_pending+0x110/0x278\n tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x10c/0x144\n tasklet_action+0x20/0x28\n _stext+0x11c/0x284\n ____do_softirq+0xc/0x14\n call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x34\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x18/0x20\n do_softirq+0x74/0x7c\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa0/0xa4\n _ieee80211_wake_txqs+0x3b0/0x4b8\n __ieee80211_wake_queue+0x12c/0x168\n ieee80211_add_pending_skbs+0xec/0x138\n ieee80211_sta_ps_deliver_wakeup+0x2a4/0x480\n ieee80211_mps_sta_status_update.part.0+0xd8/0x11c\n ieee80211_mps_sta_status_update+0x18/0x24\n sta_apply_parameters+0x3bc/0x4c0\n ieee80211_change_station+0x1b8/0x2dc\n nl80211_set_station+0x444/0x49c\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xa4/0xfc\n genl_rcv_msg+0x1b0/0x244\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x38/0x10c\n genl_rcv+0x34/0x48\n netlink_unicast+0x254/0x2bc\n netlink_sendmsg+0x190/0x3b4\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x1e8/0x218\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x68/0x8c\n __sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x84\n __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x20/0x28\n do_el0_svc+0x6c/0xe8\n el0_svc+0x14/0x48\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb4\n el0t_64_sync+0x14c/0x150\r\n\r\nUsing spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() instead prevents softirq to raise\non the same CPU that is holding the lock.(CVE-2024-40912)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: check n_ssids before accessing the ssids\r\n\r\nIn some versions of cfg80211, the ssids poinet might be a valid one even\nthough n_ssids is 0. Accessing the pointer in this case will cuase an\nout-of-bound access. Fix this by checking n_ssids first.(CVE-2024-40929)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/exynos/vidi: fix memory leak in .get_modes()\r\n\r\nThe duplicated EDID is never freed. Fix it.(CVE-2024-40932)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don\u0026apos;t read past the mfuart notifcation\r\n\r\nIn case the firmware sends a notification that claims it has more data\nthan it has, we will read past that was allocated for the notification.\nRemove the print of the buffer, we won\u0026apos;t see it by default. If needed,\nwe can see the content with tracing.\r\n\r\nThis was reported by KFENCE.(CVE-2024-40941)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: fix races between hole punching and AIO+DIO\r\n\r\nAfter commit \u0026quot;ocfs2: return real error code in ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block\u0026quot;,\nfstests/generic/300 become from always failed to sometimes failed:\r\n\r\n========================================================================\n[ 473.293420 ] run fstests generic/300\r\n\r\n[ 475.296983 ] JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal\n[ 475.302473 ] ocfs2: Mounting device (253,1) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode.\n[ 494.290998 ] OCFS2: ERROR (device dm-1): ocfs2_change_extent_flag: Owner 5668 has an extent at cpos 78723 which can no longer be found\n[ 494.291609 ] On-disk corruption discovered. Please run fsck.ocfs2 once the filesystem is unmounted.\n[ 494.292018 ] OCFS2: File system is now read-only.\n[ 494.292224 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_mark_extent_written:5272 ERROR: status = -30\n[ 494.292602 ] (kworker/19:11,2628,19):ocfs2_dio_end_io_write:2374 ERROR: status = -3\nfio: io_u error on file /mnt/scratch/racer: Read-only file system: write offset=460849152, buflen=131072\n=========================================================================\r\n\r\nIn __blockdev_direct_IO, ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block is called to add unwritten\nextents to a list. extents are also inserted into extent tree in\nocfs2_write_begin_nolock. Then another thread call fallocate to puch a\nhole at one of the unwritten extent. The extent at cpos was removed by\nocfs2_remove_extent(). At end io worker thread, ocfs2_search_extent_list\nfound there is no such extent at the cpos.\r\n\r\n T1 T2 T3\n inode lock\n ...\n insert extents\n ...\n inode unlock\nocfs2_fallocate\n __ocfs2_change_file_space\n inode lock\n lock ip_alloc_sem\n ocfs2_remove_inode_range inode\n ocfs2_remove_btree_range\n ocfs2_remove_extent\n ^---remove the extent at cpos 78723\n ...\n unlock ip_alloc_sem\n inode unlock\n ocfs2_dio_end_io\n ocfs2_dio_end_io_write\n lock ip_alloc_sem\n ocfs2_mark_extent_written\n ocfs2_change_extent_flag\n ocfs2_search_extent_list\n ^---failed to find extent\n ...\n unlock ip_alloc_sem\r\n\r\nIn most filesystems, fallocate is not compatible with racing with AIO+DIO,\nso fix it by adding to wait for all dio before fallocate/punch_hole like\next4.(CVE-2024-40943)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nMIPS: Octeon: Add PCIe link status check\r\n\r\nThe standard PCIe configuration read-write interface is used to\naccess the configuration space of the peripheral PCIe devices\nof the mips processor after the PCIe link surprise down, it can\ngenerate kernel panic caused by \u0026quot;Data bus error\u0026quot;. So it is\nnecessary to add PCIe link status check for system protection.\nWhen the PCIe link is down or in training, assigning a value\nof 0 to the configuration address can prevent read-write behavior\nto the configuration space of peripheral PCIe devices, thereby\npreventing kernel panic.(CVE-2024-40968)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc/pseries: Enforce hcall result buffer validity and size\r\n\r\nplpar_hcall(), plpar_hcall9(), and related functions expect callers to\nprovide valid result buffers of certain minimum size. Currently this\nis communicated only through comments in the code and the compiler has\nno idea.\r\n\r\nFor example, if I write a bug like this:\r\n\r\n long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; // should be PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE\n plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf, ...);\r\n\r\nThis compiles with no diagnostics emitted, but likely results in stack\ncorruption at runtime when plpar_hcall9() stores results past the end\nof the array. (To be clear this is a contrived example and I have not\nfound a real instance yet.)\r\n\r\nTo make this class of error less likely, we can use explicitly-sized\narray parameters instead of pointers in the declarations for the hcall\nAPIs. When compiled with -Warray-bounds[1], the code above now\nprovokes a diagnostic like this:\r\n\r\nerror: array argument is too small;\nis of size 32, callee requires at least 72 [-Werror,-Warray-bounds]\n 60 | plpar_hcall9(H_ALLOCATE_VAS_WINDOW, retbuf,\n | ^ ~~~~~~\r\n\r\n[1] Enabled for LLVM builds but not GCC for now. See commit\n 0da6e5fd6c37 (\u0026quot;gcc: disable \u0026apos;-Warray-bounds\u0026apos; for gcc-13 too\u0026quot;) and\n related changes.(CVE-2024-40974)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: force a dst refcount before doing decryption\r\n\r\nAs it says in commit 3bc07321ccc2 (\u0026quot;xfrm: Force a dst refcount before\nentering the xfrm type handlers\u0026quot;):\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;Crypto requests might return asynchronous. In this case we leave the\n rcu protected region, so force a refcount on the skb\u0026apos;s destination\n entry before we enter the xfrm type input/output handlers.\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nOn TIPC decryption path it has the same problem, and skb_dst_force()\nshould be called before doing decryption to avoid a possible crash.\r\n\r\nShuang reported this issue when this warning is triggered:\r\n\r\n [] WARNING: include/net/dst.h:337 tipc_sk_rcv+0x1055/0x1ea0 [tipc]\n [] Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W --------- - - 4.18.0-496.el8.x86_64+debug\n [] Workqueue: crypto cryptd_queue_worker\n [] RIP: 0010:tipc_sk_rcv+0x1055/0x1ea0 [tipc]\n [] Call Trace:\n [] tipc_sk_mcast_rcv+0x548/0xea0 [tipc]\n [] tipc_rcv+0xcf5/0x1060 [tipc]\n [] tipc_aead_decrypt_done+0x215/0x2e0 [tipc]\n [] cryptd_aead_crypt+0xdb/0x190\n [] cryptd_queue_worker+0xed/0x190\n [] process_one_work+0x93d/0x17e0(CVE-2024-40983)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPICA: Revert \u0026quot;ACPICA: avoid Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is fine.\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nUndo the modifications made in commit d410ee5109a1 (\u0026quot;ACPICA: avoid\n\u0026quot;Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is fine.\u0026quot;\u0026quot;). The initial\npurpose of this commit was to stop memory mappings for operation\nregions from overlapping page boundaries, as it can trigger warnings\nif different page attributes are present.\r\n\r\nHowever, it was found that when this situation arises, mapping\ncontinues until the boundary\u0026apos;s end, but there is still an attempt to\nread/write the entire length of the map, leading to a NULL pointer\ndeference. For example, if a four-byte mapping request is made but\nonly one byte is mapped because it hits the current page boundary\u0026apos;s\nend, a four-byte read/write attempt is still made, resulting in a NULL\npointer deference.\r\n\r\nInstead, map the entire length, as the ACPI specification does not\nmandate that it must be within the same page boundary. It is\npermissible for it to be mapped across different regions.(CVE-2024-40984)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: fix UBSAN warning in kv_dpm.c\r\n\r\nAdds bounds check for sumo_vid_mapping_entry.(CVE-2024-40987)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracing: Build event generation tests only as modules\r\n\r\nThe kprobes and synth event generation test modules add events and lock\n(get a reference) those event file reference in module init function,\nand unlock and delete it in module exit function. This is because those\nare designed for playing as modules.\r\n\r\nIf we make those modules as built-in, those events are left locked in the\nkernel, and never be removed. This causes kprobe event self-test failure\nas below.\r\n\r\n[ 97.349708] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 97.353453] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:2133 kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480\n[ 97.357106] Modules linked in:\n[ 97.358488] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-g699646734ab5-dirty #14\n[ 97.361556] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n[ 97.363880] RIP: 0010:kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480\n[ 97.365538] Code: a8 24 08 82 e9 ae fd ff ff 90 0f 0b 90 48 c7 c7 e5 aa 0b 82 e9 ee fc ff ff 90 0f 0b 90 48 c7 c7 2d 61 06 82 e9 8e fd ff ff 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 48 c7 c7 33 0b 0c 82 89 c6 e8 6e 03 1f ff 41 ff c7 e9 90\n[ 97.370429] RSP: 0000:ffffc90000013b50 EFLAGS: 00010286\n[ 97.371852] RAX: 00000000fffffff0 RBX: ffff888005919c00 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[ 97.373829] RDX: ffff888003f40000 RSI: ffffffff8236a598 RDI: ffff888003f40a68\n[ 97.375715] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\n[ 97.377675] R10: ffffffff811c9ae5 R11: ffffffff8120c4e0 R12: 0000000000000000\n[ 97.379591] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000015 R15: 0000000000000000\n[ 97.381536] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88807dcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 97.383813] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 97.385449] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000002244000 CR4: 00000000000006b0\n[ 97.387347] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 97.389277] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 97.391196] Call Trace:\n[ 97.391967] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 97.392647] ? __warn+0xcc/0x180\n[ 97.393640] ? kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480\n[ 97.395181] ? report_bug+0xbd/0x150\n[ 97.396234] ? handle_bug+0x3e/0x60\n[ 97.397311] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50\n[ 97.398434] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[ 97.399652] ? trace_kprobe_is_busy+0x20/0x20\n[ 97.400904] ? tracing_reset_all_online_cpus+0x15/0x90\n[ 97.402304] ? kprobe_trace_self_tests_init+0x3f1/0x480\n[ 97.403773] ? init_kprobe_trace+0x50/0x50\n[ 97.404972] do_one_initcall+0x112/0x240\n[ 97.406113] do_initcall_level+0x95/0xb0\n[ 97.407286] ? kernel_init+0x1a/0x1a0\n[ 97.408401] do_initcalls+0x3f/0x70\n[ 97.409452] kernel_init_freeable+0x16f/0x1e0\n[ 97.410662] ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0\n[ 97.411738] kernel_init+0x1a/0x1a0\n[ 97.412788] ret_from_fork+0x39/0x50\n[ 97.413817] ? rest_init+0x1f0/0x1f0\n[ 97.414844] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 97.416285] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 97.417134] irq event stamp: 13437323\n[ 97.418376] hardirqs last enabled at (13437337): [\u0026lt;ffffffff8110bc0c\u0026gt;] console_unlock+0x11c/0x150\n[ 97.421285] hardirqs last disabled at (13437370): [\u0026lt;ffffffff8110bbf1\u0026gt;] console_unlock+0x101/0x150\n[ 97.423838] softirqs last enabled at (13437366): [\u0026lt;ffffffff8108e17f\u0026gt;] handle_softirqs+0x23f/0x2a0\n[ 97.426450] softirqs last disabled at (13437393): [\u0026lt;ffffffff8108e346\u0026gt;] __irq_exit_rcu+0x66/0xd0\n[ 97.428850] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\r\n\r\nAnd also, since we can not cleanup dynamic_event file, ftracetest are\nfailed too.\r\n\r\nTo avoid these issues, build these tests only as modules.(CVE-2024-41004)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetpoll: Fix race condition in netpoll_owner_active\r\n\r\nKCSAN detected a race condition in netpoll:\r\n\r\n\tBUG: KCSAN: data-race in net_rx_action / netpoll_send_skb\n\twrite (marked) to 0xffff8881164168b0 of 4 bytes by interrupt on cpu 10:\n\tnet_rx_action (./include/linux/netpoll.h:90 net/core/dev.c:6712 net/core/dev.c:6822)\n\u0026lt;snip\u0026gt;\n\tread to 0xffff8881164168b0 of 4 bytes by task 1 on cpu 2:\n\tnetpoll_send_skb (net/core/netpoll.c:319 net/core/netpoll.c:345 net/core/netpoll.c:393)\n\tnetpoll_send_udp (net/core/netpoll.c:?)\n\u0026lt;snip\u0026gt;\n\tvalue changed: 0x0000000a -\u0026gt; 0xffffffff\r\n\r\nThis happens because netpoll_owner_active() needs to check if the\ncurrent CPU is the owner of the lock, touching napi-\u0026gt;poll_owner\nnon atomically. The -\u0026gt;poll_owner field contains the current CPU holding\nthe lock.\r\n\r\nUse an atomic read to check if the poll owner is the current CPU.(CVE-2024-41005)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: avoid too many retransmit packets\r\n\r\nIf a TCP socket is using TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, and the other peer\nretracted its window to zero, tcp_retransmit_timer() can\nretransmit a packet every two jiffies (2 ms for HZ=1000),\nfor about 4 minutes after TCP_USER_TIMEOUT has \u0026apos;expired\u0026apos;.\r\n\r\nThe fix is to make sure tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out() takes\nicsk-\u0026gt;icsk_user_timeout into account.\r\n\r\nBefore blamed commit, the socket would not timeout after\nicsk-\u0026gt;icsk_user_timeout, but would use standard exponential\nbackoff for the retransmits.\r\n\r\nAlso worth noting that before commit e89688e3e978 (\u0026quot;net: tcp:\nfix unexcepted socket die when snd_wnd is 0\u0026quot;), the issue\nwould last 2 minutes instead of 4.(CVE-2024-41007)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Fix overrunning reservations in ringbuf\r\n\r\nThe BPF ring buffer internally is implemented as a power-of-2 sized circular\nbuffer, with two logical and ever-increasing counters: consumer_pos is the\nconsumer counter to show which logical position the consumer consumed the\ndata, and producer_pos which is the producer counter denoting the amount of\ndata reserved by all producers.\r\n\r\nEach time a record is reserved, the producer that \u0026quot;owns\u0026quot; the record will\nsuccessfully advance producer counter. In user space each time a record is\nread, the consumer of the data advanced the consumer counter once it finished\nprocessing. Both counters are stored in separate pages so that from user\nspace, the producer counter is read-only and the consumer counter is read-write.\r\n\r\nOne aspect that simplifies and thus speeds up the implementation of both\nproducers and consumers is how the data area is mapped twice contiguously\nback-to-back in the virtual memory, allowing to not take any special measures\nfor samples that have to wrap around at the end of the circular buffer data\narea, because the next page after the last data page would be first data page\nagain, and thus the sample will still appear completely contiguous in virtual\nmemory.\r\n\r\nEach record has a struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr { u32 len; u32 pg_off; } header for\nbook-keeping the length and offset, and is inaccessible to the BPF program.\nHelpers like bpf_ringbuf_reserve() return `(void *)hdr + BPF_RINGBUF_HDR_SZ`\nfor the BPF program to use. Bing-Jhong and Muhammad reported that it is however\npossible to make a second allocated memory chunk overlapping with the first\nchunk and as a result, the BPF program is now able to edit first chunk\u0026apos;s\nheader.\r\n\r\nFor example, consider the creation of a BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF map with size\nof 0x4000. Next, the consumer_pos is modified to 0x3000 /before/ a call to\nbpf_ringbuf_reserve() is made. This will allocate a chunk A, which is in\n[0x0,0x3008], and the BPF program is able to edit [0x8,0x3008]. Now, lets\nallocate a chunk B with size 0x3000. This will succeed because consumer_pos\nwas edited ahead of time to pass the `new_prod_pos - cons_pos \u0026gt; rb-\u0026gt;mask`\ncheck. Chunk B will be in range [0x3008,0x6010], and the BPF program is able\nto edit [0x3010,0x6010]. Due to the ring buffer memory layout mentioned\nearlier, the ranges [0x0,0x4000] and [0x4000,0x8000] point to the same data\npages. This means that chunk B at [0x4000,0x4008] is chunk A\u0026apos;s header.\nbpf_ringbuf_submit() / bpf_ringbuf_discard() use the header\u0026apos;s pg_off to then\nlocate the bpf_ringbuf itself via bpf_ringbuf_restore_from_rec(). Once chunk\nB modified chunk A\u0026apos;s header, then bpf_ringbuf_commit() refers to the wrong\npage and could cause a crash.\r\n\r\nFix it by calculating the oldest pending_pos and check whether the range\nfrom the oldest outstanding record to the newest would span beyond the ring\nbuffer size. If that is the case, then reject the request. We\u0026apos;ve tested with\nthe ring buffer benchmark in BPF selftests (./benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh)\nbefore/after the fix and while it seems a bit slower on some benchmarks, it\nis still not significantly enough to matter.(CVE-2024-41009)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1894",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:21Z",
"published": "2024-07-26T11:07:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36031"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41009"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47432",
"CVE-2021-47622",
"CVE-2022-48814",
"CVE-2022-48816",
"CVE-2022-48844",
"CVE-2023-52757",
"CVE-2023-52781",
"CVE-2024-36031",
"CVE-2024-36939",
"CVE-2024-38559",
"CVE-2024-38568",
"CVE-2024-38578",
"CVE-2024-38589",
"CVE-2024-38618",
"CVE-2024-38619",
"CVE-2024-39469",
"CVE-2024-39472",
"CVE-2024-39494",
"CVE-2024-39499",
"CVE-2024-39505",
"CVE-2024-40904",
"CVE-2024-40905",
"CVE-2024-40912",
"CVE-2024-40929",
"CVE-2024-40932",
"CVE-2024-40941",
"CVE-2024-40943",
"CVE-2024-40968",
"CVE-2024-40974",
"CVE-2024-40983",
"CVE-2024-40984",
"CVE-2024-40987",
"CVE-2024-41004",
"CVE-2024-41005",
"CVE-2024-41007",
"CVE-2024-41009"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.