Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-38552 (GCVE-0-2024-38552)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-06-19 13:35 – Updated: 2026-08-05 11:32| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c
(git)
Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7 (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869 (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86 (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123 (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29 (git) Affected: b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942 , < 63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
4.16
Unaffected: 0 , < 4.16 (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.316 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.278 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.219 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.161 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.93 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.33 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.8.12 , ≤ 6.8.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.9.3 , ≤ 6.9.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:24.332Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:50.788974Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T17:34:57.332Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:54:36.137Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.16"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.16",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\n\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0027i\u0027 exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\n\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0027i\u0027 is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0027i\u0027 is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\n\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The code is reached only through the DRM atomic modeset ioctl on /dev/dri/cardN (amdgpu_dm color management \u2192 dcn*_set_output_transfer_func); there is no network or remote-peer path into the AMD display color pipeline.\nAC:L - The attacker directly supplies the GAMMA_LUT/DEGAMMA_LUT blobs and the shaper/blend transfer-function enums that drive the loop, and can re-issue the atomic commit at will with no race and no dependence on unpredictable system state.\nPR:L - DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC is gated on DRM_MASTER (drm_ioctl.c:701), which the logged-in seat user or a member of the video group holds on the active VT \u2014 no root or CAP_SYS_ADMIN is required.\nUI:N - The attacker performs the atomic commit itself; no victim action, no filesystem mount, and no separate user interaction is needed.\nS:U - The out-of-bounds access stays within the kernel\u0027s own memory and the amdgpu driver\u0027s security authority; no VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - The flagged defect is an unbounded out-of-bounds read past the 1025-entry tf_pts arrays inside the kernel heap object, not a read strictly bounded to a few bytes, so adjacent kernel heap contents can be sampled and pushed into the display pipeline.\nI:L - The out-of-bounds values are converted and programmed into the DPP regamma/shaper hardware LUT, corrupting display output with attacker-uncontrolled kernel data; there is no out-of-bounds write and no control-flow hijack primitive, so impact is limited.\nA:H - An out-of-bounds read at a large index can touch an unmapped page or trip KASAN/hardened-usercopy checks, oopsing in the atomic commit path while display locks are held, and an unprivileged seat user can retrigger it in a loop."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:43.970Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
}
],
"title": "drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-38552",
"datePublished": "2024-06-19T13:35:24.067Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T19:36:34.920Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:43.970Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-38552",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00297",
"percentile": "0.22607"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.16"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.16",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ED5E0A5E-EF43-449A-90CC-20F2A9F6DBB5",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FDBF235-DA18-49A1-8690-6C7272FD0701",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9063AF3-D593-43B7-810D-58B87F82F9F9",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "31130639-53FE-4726-8986-434EE2528CB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EEFB78EE-F990-4197-BF1C-156760A55667",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80550309-67AB-4FD1-AC07-3DED5C4F01B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E07124C1-19E8-4D21-828D-9932A01D3011",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\n\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0027i\u0027 exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\n\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0027i\u0027 is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0027i\u0027 is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\n\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/amd/display: corrige un posible \u00edndice fuera de los l\u00edmites en la funci\u00f3n de transformaci\u00f3n de color. Corrige el problema de \u00edndice fuera de los l\u00edmites en la funci\u00f3n de transformaci\u00f3n de color. El problema podr\u00eda ocurrir cuando el \u00edndice \u0027i\u0027 excede la cantidad de puntos de funci\u00f3n de transferencia (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). La soluci\u00f3n agrega una verificaci\u00f3n para garantizar que \u0027i\u0027 est\u00e9 dentro de los l\u00edmites antes de acceder a los puntos de funci\u00f3n de transferencia. Si \u0027i\u0027 est\u00e1 fuera de los l\u00edmites, se registra un mensaje de error y la funci\u00f3n devuelve falso para indicar un error. Reportado por smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: desbordamiento del b\u00fafer \u0027output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u0026lt;= controladores s32max/gpu /drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: desbordamiento del b\u00fafer \u0027output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u0026lt;= controladores s32max/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ ../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 error de cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format(): desbordamiento del b\u00fafer \u0027output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:18:43.230",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.5,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:50.788974Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-19T14:15:15.450",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-129"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T22:46:37+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-38552",
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"initial_release_date": "2024-06-19T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "198",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-38552.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T17:21:24.332Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:54:36.137Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:50.788974Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:27.134Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.16"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.16",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\n\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0027i\u0027 exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\n\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0027i\u0027 is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0027i\u0027 is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\n\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The code is reached only through the DRM atomic modeset ioctl on /dev/dri/cardN (amdgpu_dm color management \u2192 dcn*_set_output_transfer_func); there is no network or remote-peer path into the AMD display color pipeline.\nAC:L - The attacker directly supplies the GAMMA_LUT/DEGAMMA_LUT blobs and the shaper/blend transfer-function enums that drive the loop, and can re-issue the atomic commit at will with no race and no dependence on unpredictable system state.\nPR:L - DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ATOMIC is gated on DRM_MASTER (drm_ioctl.c:701), which the logged-in seat user or a member of the video group holds on the active VT \u2014 no root or CAP_SYS_ADMIN is required.\nUI:N - The attacker performs the atomic commit itself; no victim action, no filesystem mount, and no separate user interaction is needed.\nS:U - The out-of-bounds access stays within the kernel\u0027s own memory and the amdgpu driver\u0027s security authority; no VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - The flagged defect is an unbounded out-of-bounds read past the 1025-entry tf_pts arrays inside the kernel heap object, not a read strictly bounded to a few bytes, so adjacent kernel heap contents can be sampled and pushed into the display pipeline.\nI:L - The out-of-bounds values are converted and programmed into the DPP regamma/shaper hardware LUT, corrupting display output with attacker-uncontrolled kernel data; there is no out-of-bounds write and no control-flow hijack primitive, so impact is limited.\nA:H - An out-of-bounds read at a large index can touch an unmapped page or trip KASAN/hardened-usercopy checks, oopsing in the atomic commit path while display locks are held, and an unprivileged seat user can retrigger it in a loop."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:43.970Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
}
],
"title": "drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-38552",
"datePublished": "2024-06-19T13:35:24.067Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T19:36:34.920Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:32:43.970Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-08-23 - Updated: 2024-08-23
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-269355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-269355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-08-23T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2980-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242980-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2940-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242940-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2944-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242944-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2943-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242943-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2948-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242948-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2973-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242973-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-08-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:2947-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242947-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-13 - Updated: 2024-09-13
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0778",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7005-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7008-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7008-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-6999-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7006-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7006-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7004-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7004-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-20 - Updated: 2024-09-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0799",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7022-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7022-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7009-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7019-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7019-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-13",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7005-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-2"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-09-27 - Updated: 2024-09-27
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-32936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42160"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0823",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-09-27T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7039-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7039-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7020-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7020-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-6999-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7009-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7003-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7003-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7029-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7029-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7021-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7021-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7007-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-09-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7028-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7028-1"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-38552
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-06-19 14:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 11:187.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca",
"status": "affected",
"version": "b629596072e5fa901c84f9e88d845a696ee32942",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.16"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.16",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.316",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.278",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.219",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.161",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.93",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.33",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.9.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ED5E0A5E-EF43-449A-90CC-20F2A9F6DBB5",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.316",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7FDBF235-DA18-49A1-8690-6C7272FD0701",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.278",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E9063AF3-D593-43B7-810D-58B87F82F9F9",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.219",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "31130639-53FE-4726-8986-434EE2528CB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.161",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EEFB78EE-F990-4197-BF1C-156760A55667",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FCE796DF-3B50-4DC6-BAE5-95271068FC9E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.33",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80550309-67AB-4FD1-AC07-3DED5C4F01B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.8.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E07124C1-19E8-4D21-828D-9932A01D3011",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\n\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0027i\u0027 exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\n\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0027i\u0027 is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0027i\u0027 is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\n\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/amd/display: corrige un posible \u00edndice fuera de los l\u00edmites en la funci\u00f3n de transformaci\u00f3n de color. Corrige el problema de \u00edndice fuera de los l\u00edmites en la funci\u00f3n de transformaci\u00f3n de color. El problema podr\u00eda ocurrir cuando el \u00edndice \u0027i\u0027 excede la cantidad de puntos de funci\u00f3n de transferencia (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). La soluci\u00f3n agrega una verificaci\u00f3n para garantizar que \u0027i\u0027 est\u00e9 dentro de los l\u00edmites antes de acceder a los puntos de funci\u00f3n de transferencia. Si \u0027i\u0027 est\u00e1 fuera de los l\u00edmites, se registra un mensaje de error y la funci\u00f3n devuelve falso para indicar un error. Reportado por smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: desbordamiento del b\u00fafer \u0027output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u0026lt;= controladores s32max/gpu /drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: desbordamiento del b\u00fafer \u0027output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u0026lt;= controladores s32max/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ ../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 error de cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format(): desbordamiento del b\u00fafer \u0027output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:18:43.230",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.5,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-38552",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T17:14:50.788974Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-06-19T14:15:15.450",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-129"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-R3VW-M8QR-8F9R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-19 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function
Fixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).
The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, an error message is logged and the function returns false to indicate an error.
Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38552"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-19T14:15:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\n\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0027i\u0027 exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\n\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0027i\u0027 is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0027i\u0027 is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\n\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.red\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.green\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0027output_tf-\u003etf_pts.blue\u0027 1025 \u003c= s32max",
"id": "GHSA-r3vw-m8qr-8f9r",
"modified": "2026-05-12T12:31:54Z",
"published": "2024-06-19T15:30:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04bc4d1090c343025d69149ca669a27c5b9c34a7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/123edbae64f4d21984359b99c6e79fcde31c6123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e8c8b37ee84b3b19c448d2b8e4c916d2f5b9c86"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604c506ca43fce52bb882cff9c1fdf2ec3b4029c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63ae548f1054a0b71678d0349c7dc9628ddd42ca"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7226ddf3311c5e5a7726ad7d4e7b079bb3cfbb29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98b8a6bfd30d07a19cfacdf82b50f84bf3360869"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced9c4e2289a786b8fa684d8893b7045ea53ef7e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e280ab978c81443103d7c61bdd1d8d708cf6ed6d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-24-102-01
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2024-04-09 00:00 - Updated: 2026-05-14 06:00OESA-2024-1767 (CVE-2021-47231)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-28 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: mcba_usb: fix memory leak in mcba_usb
Syzbot reported memory leak in SocketCAN driver for Microchip CAN BUS Analyzer Tool. The problem was in unfreed usb_coherent.
In mcba_usb_start() 20 coherent buffers are allocated and there is nothing, that frees them:
1) In callback function the urb is resubmitted and that's all 2) In disconnect function urbs are simply killed, but URB_FREE_BUFFER is not set (see mcba_usb_start) and this flag cannot be used with coherent buffers.
Fail log: | [ 1354.053291][ T8413] mcba_usb 1-1:0.0 can0: device disconnected | [ 1367.059384][ T8420] kmemleak: 20 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmem)
So, all allocated buffers should be freed with usb_free_coherent() explicitly
NOTE: The same pattern for allocating and freeing coherent buffers is used in drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_core.c(CVE-2021-47231)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: j1939: fix Use-after-Free, hold skb ref while in use
This patch fixes a Use-after-Free found by the syzbot.
The problem is that a skb is taken from the per-session skb queue, without incrementing the ref count. This leads to a Use-after-Free if the skb is taken concurrently from the session queue due to a CTS.(CVE-2021-47232)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: Avoid WARN_ON timing related checks
The soft/batadv interface for a queued OGM can be changed during the time the OGM was queued for transmission and when the OGM is actually transmitted by the worker.
But WARN_ON must be used to denote kernel bugs and not to print simple warnings. A warning can simply be printed using pr_warn.(CVE-2021-47252)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: ngene: Fix out-of-bounds bug in ngene_command_config_free_buf()
Fix an 11-year old bug in ngene_command_config_free_buf() while addressing the following warnings caught with -Warray-bounds:
arch/alpha/include/asm/string.h:22:16: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [12, 16] from the object at 'com' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'config' with type 'unsigned char' at offset 10 [-Warray-bounds] arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [12, 16] from the object at 'com' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'config' with type 'unsigned char' at offset 10 [-Warray-bounds]
The problem is that the original code is trying to copy 6 bytes of data into a one-byte size member config of the wrong structue FW_CONFIGURE_BUFFERS, in a single call to memcpy(). This causes a legitimate compiler warning because memcpy() overruns the length of &com.cmd.ConfigureBuffers.config. It seems that the right structure is FW_CONFIGURE_FREE_BUFFERS, instead, because it contains 6 more members apart from the header hdr. Also, the name of the function ngene_command_config_free_buf() suggests that the actual intention is to ConfigureFreeBuffers, instead of ConfigureBuffers (which takes place in the function ngene_command_config_buf(), above).
Fix this by enclosing those 6 members of struct FW_CONFIGURE_FREE_BUFFERS into new struct config, and use &com.cmd.ConfigureFreeBuffers.config as the destination address, instead of &com.cmd.ConfigureBuffers.config, when calling memcpy().
This also helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy().(CVE-2021-47288)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
coresight: tmc-etf: Fix global-out-of-bounds in tmc_update_etf_buffer()
commit 6f755e85c332 ("coresight: Add helper for inserting synchronization packets") removed trailing '\0' from barrier_pkt array and updated the call sites like etb_update_buffer() to have proper checks for barrier_pkt size before read but missed updating tmc_update_etf_buffer() which still reads barrier_pkt past the array size resulting in KASAN out-of-bounds bug. Fix this by adding a check for barrier_pkt size before accessing like it is done in etb_update_buffer().
BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in tmc_update_etf_buffer+0x4b8/0x698 Read of size 4 at addr ffffffd05b7d1030 by task perf/2629
Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x27c show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0x11c/0x188 print_address_description+0x3c/0x4a4 __kasan_report+0x140/0x164 kasan_report+0x10/0x18 __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x1c/0x24 tmc_update_etf_buffer+0x4b8/0x698 etm_event_stop+0x248/0x2d8 etm_event_del+0x20/0x2c event_sched_out+0x214/0x6f0 group_sched_out+0xd0/0x270 ctx_sched_out+0x2ec/0x518 __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x4fc/0xe6c __schedule+0x1094/0x16a0 preempt_schedule_irq+0x88/0x170 arm64_preempt_schedule_irq+0xf0/0x18c el1_irq+0xe8/0x180 perf_event_exec+0x4d8/0x56c setup_new_exec+0x204/0x400 load_elf_binary+0x72c/0x18c0 search_binary_handler+0x13c/0x420 load_script+0x500/0x6c4 search_binary_handler+0x13c/0x420 exec_binprm+0x118/0x654 __do_execve_file+0x77c/0xba4 __arm64_compat_sys_execve+0x98/0xac el0_svc_common+0x1f8/0x5e0 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x84/0xb0 el0_svc_compat+0x10/0x50
The buggy address belongs to the variable: barrier_pkt+0x10/0x40
Memory state around the buggy address: ffffffd05b7d0f00: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 ffffffd05b7d0f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffffffd05b7d1000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 03 ^ ffffffd05b7d1080: fa fa fa fa 00 02 fa fa fa fa fa fa 03 fa fa fa ffffffd05b7d1100: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa ==================================================================(CVE-2021-47346)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wl1251: Fix possible buffer overflow in wl1251_cmd_scan
Function wl1251_cmd_scan calls memcpy without checking the length. Harden by checking the length is within the maximum allowed size.(CVE-2021-47347)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xhci: Fix command ring pointer corruption while aborting a command
The command ring pointer is located at [6:63] bits of the command ring control register (CRCR). All the control bits like command stop, abort are located at [0:3] bits. While aborting a command, we read the CRCR and set the abort bit and write to the CRCR. The read will always give command ring pointer as all zeros. So we essentially write only the control bits. Since we split the 64 bit write into two 32 bit writes, there is a possibility of xHC command ring stopped before the upper dword (all zeros) is written. If that happens, xHC updates the upper dword of its internal command ring pointer with all zeros. Next time, when the command ring is restarted, we see xHC memory access failures. Fix this issue by only writing to the lower dword of CRCR where all control bits are located.(CVE-2021-47434)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm, slub: fix potential memoryleak in kmem_cache_open()
In error path, the random_seq of slub cache might be leaked. Fix this by using __kmem_cache_release() to release all the relevant resources.(CVE-2021-47466)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses
Currently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new devices so that we can check that we're not trying to reuse a chip select that's already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is itself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI devices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate those devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller and hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care about concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per controller, avoiding the deadlock.
This can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.(CVE-2021-47469)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix race between searching chunks and release journal_head from buffer_head
Encountered a race between ocfs2_test_bg_bit_allocatable() and jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() resulting in the below vmcore.
PID: 106879 TASK: ffff880244ba9c00 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "loop3" Call trace: panic oops_end no_context __bad_area_nosemaphore bad_area_nosemaphore __do_page_fault do_page_fault page_fault [exception RIP: ocfs2_block_group_find_clear_bits+316] ocfs2_block_group_find_clear_bits [ocfs2] ocfs2_cluster_group_search [ocfs2] ocfs2_search_chain [ocfs2] ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits [ocfs2] __ocfs2_claim_clusters [ocfs2] ocfs2_claim_clusters [ocfs2] ocfs2_local_alloc_slide_window [ocfs2] ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits [ocfs2] ocfs2_reserve_clusters_with_limit [ocfs2] ocfs2_reserve_clusters [ocfs2] ocfs2_lock_refcount_allocators [ocfs2] ocfs2_make_clusters_writable [ocfs2] ocfs2_replace_cow [ocfs2] ocfs2_refcount_cow [ocfs2] ocfs2_file_write_iter [ocfs2] lo_rw_aio loop_queue_work kthread_worker_fn kthread ret_from_fork
When ocfs2_test_bg_bit_allocatable() called bh2jh(bg_bh), the bg_bh->b_private NULL as jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() raced and released the jounal head from the buffer head. Needed to take bit lock for the bit 'BH_JournalHead' to fix this race.(CVE-2021-47493)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: mma8452: Fix trigger reference couting
The mma8452 driver directly assigns a trigger to the struct iio_dev. The
IIO core when done using this trigger will call iio_trigger_put() to drop
the reference count by 1.
Without the matching iio_trigger_get() in the driver the reference count
can reach 0 too early, the trigger gets freed while still in use and a
use-after-free occurs.
Fix this by getting a reference to the trigger before assigning it to the IIO device.(CVE-2021-47500)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: sja1000: fix use after free in ems_pcmcia_add_card()
If the last channel is not available then "dev" is freed. Fortunately, we can just use "pdev->irq" instead.
Also we should check if at least one channel was set up.(CVE-2021-47521)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: mpt3sas: Fix kernel panic during drive powercycle test
While looping over shost's sdev list it is possible that one of the drives is getting removed and its sas_target object is freed but its sdev object remains intact.
Consequently, a kernel panic can occur while the driver is trying to access the sas_address field of sas_target object without also checking the sas_target object for NULL.(CVE-2021-47565)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet_diag: fix kernel-infoleak for UDP sockets
KMSAN reported a kernel-infoleak [1], that can exploited by unpriv users.
After analysis it turned out UDP was not initializing r->idiag_expires. Other users of inet_sk_diag_fill() might make the same mistake in the future, so fix this in inet_sk_diag_fill().
[1] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:121 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copyout lib/iov_iter.c:156 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x69d/0x25c0 lib/iov_iter.c:670 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:121 [inline] copyout lib/iov_iter.c:156 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x69d/0x25c0 lib/iov_iter.c:670 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:155 [inline] simple_copy_to_iter+0xf3/0x140 net/core/datagram.c:519 __skb_datagram_iter+0x2cb/0x1280 net/core/datagram.c:425 skb_copy_datagram_iter+0xdc/0x270 net/core/datagram.c:533 skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:3657 [inline] netlink_recvmsg+0x660/0x1c60 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1974 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:944 [inline] sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:962 [inline] sock_read_iter+0x5a9/0x630 net/socket.c:1035 call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2156 [inline] new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:400 [inline] vfs_read+0x1631/0x1980 fs/read_write.c:481 ksys_read+0x28c/0x520 fs/read_write.c:619 __do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:629 [inline] __se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:627 [inline] __x64_sys_read+0xdb/0x120 fs/read_write.c:627 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:524 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3251 [inline] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xe0c/0x1510 mm/slub.c:4974 kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:354 [inline] __alloc_skb+0x545/0xf90 net/core/skbuff.c:426 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1126 [inline] netlink_dump+0x3d5/0x16a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2245 __netlink_dump_start+0xd1c/0xee0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2370 netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:254 [inline] inet_diag_handler_cmd+0x2e7/0x400 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1343 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x24a/0x620 netlink_rcv_skb+0x447/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2491 sock_diag_rcv+0x63/0x80 net/core/sock_diag.c:276 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x1095/0x1360 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 netlink_sendmsg+0x16f3/0x1870 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1916 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:724 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x594/0x690 net/socket.c:1057 do_iter_readv_writev+0xa7f/0xc70 do_iter_write+0x52c/0x1500 fs/read_write.c:851 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:924 [inline] do_writev+0x63f/0xe30 fs/read_write.c:967 __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1040 [inline] __se_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1037 [inline] __x64_sys_writev+0xe5/0x120 fs/read_write.c:1037 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Bytes 68-71 of 312 are uninitialized Memory access of size 312 starts at ffff88812ab54000 Data copied to user address 0000000020001440
CPU: 1 PID: 6365 Comm: syz-executor801 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011(CVE-2021-47597)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firmware: arm_scpi: Fix string overflow in SCPI genpd driver
Without the bound checks for scpi_pd->name, it could result in the buffer overflow when copying the SCPI device name from the corresponding device tree node as the name string is set at maximum size of 30.
Let us fix it by using devm_kasprintf so that the string buffer is allocated dynamically.(CVE-2021-47609)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()
We don't currently validate that the values being set are within the range we advertised to userspace as being valid, do so and reject any values that are out of range.(CVE-2022-48737)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06
Johan reported the below crash with test_bpf on ppc64 e5500:
test_bpf: #296 ALU_END_FROM_LE 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1] BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500 Modules linked in: test_bpf(+) CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty #1 NIP: 8000000000061c3c LR: 80000000006dea64 CTR: 8000000000061c18 REGS: c0000000032d3420 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty) MSR: 0000000080089000 <EE,ME> CR: 88002822 XER: 20000000 IRQMASK: 0 <...> NIP [8000000000061c3c] 0x8000000000061c3c LR [80000000006dea64] .__run_one+0x104/0x17c [test_bpf] Call Trace: .__run_one+0x60/0x17c [test_bpf] (unreliable) .test_bpf_init+0x6a8/0xdc8 [test_bpf] .do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x28c .do_init_module+0x68/0x28c .load_module+0x2460/0x2abc .__do_sys_init_module+0x120/0x18c .system_call_exception+0x110/0x1b8 system_call_common+0xf0/0x210 --- interrupt: c00 at 0x101d0acc <...> ---[ end trace 47b2bf19090bb3d0 ]---
Illegal instruction
The illegal instruction turned out to be 'ldbrx' emitted for BPF_FROM_[L|B]E, which was only introduced in ISA v2.06. Guard use of the same and implement an alternative approach for older processors.(CVE-2022-48755)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dsi: invalid parameter check in msm_dsi_phy_enable
The function performs a check on the "phy" input parameter, however, it is used before the check.
Initialize the "dev" variable after the sanity check to avoid a possible NULL pointer dereference.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1493860 ("Null pointer dereference")(CVE-2022-48756)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rpmsg: virtio: Free driver_override when rpmsg_remove()
Free driver_override when rpmsg_remove(), otherwise the following memory leak will occur:
unreferenced object 0xffff0000d55d7080 (size 128): comm "kworker/u8:2", pid 56, jiffies 4294893188 (age 214.272s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 72 70 6d 73 67 5f 6e 73 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 rpmsg_ns........ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000009c94c9c1>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1f8/0x320 [<000000002300d89b>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x44/0x70 [<00000000228a60c3>] kstrndup+0x4c/0x90 [<0000000077158695>] driver_set_override+0xd0/0x164 [<000000003e9c4ea5>] rpmsg_register_device_override+0x98/0x170 [<000000001c0c89a8>] rpmsg_ns_register_device+0x24/0x30 [<000000008bbf8fa2>] rpmsg_probe+0x2e0/0x3ec [<00000000e65a68df>] virtio_dev_probe+0x1c0/0x280 [<00000000443331cc>] really_probe+0xbc/0x2dc [<00000000391064b1>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0 [<00000000a41c9a5b>] driver_probe_device+0xd8/0x160 [<000000009c3bd5df>] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x140 [<0000000043cd7614>] bus_for_each_drv+0x7c/0xd4 [<000000003b929a36>] __device_attach+0x9c/0x19c [<00000000a94e0ba8>] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20 [<000000003c999637>] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xac(CVE-2023-52670)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Fix page corruption caused by racy check in __free_pages
When we upgraded our kernel, we started seeing some page corruption like the following consistently:
BUG: Bad page state in process ganesha.nfsd pfn:1304ca page:0000000022261c55 refcount:0 mapcount:-128 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1304ca flags: 0x17ffffc0000000() raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffff8a513ffd4c98 ffffeee24b35ec08 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 00000000ffffff7f 0000000000000000 page dumped because: nonzero mapcount CPU: 0 PID: 15567 Comm: ganesha.nfsd Kdump: loaded Tainted: P B O 5.10.158-1.nutanix.20221209.el7.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/05/2016 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x74/0x96 bad_page.cold+0x63/0x94 check_new_page_bad+0x6d/0x80 rmqueue+0x46e/0x970 get_page_from_freelist+0xcb/0x3f0 ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x40 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x164/0x300 alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xf0 skb_page_frag_refill+0x84/0x110 ...
Sometimes, it would also show up as corruption in the free list pointer and cause crashes.
After bisecting the issue, we found the issue started from commit e320d3012d25 ("mm/page_alloc.c: fix freeing non-compound pages"):
if (put_page_testzero(page))
free_the_page(page, order);
else if (!PageHead(page))
while (order-- > 0)
free_the_page(page + (1 << order), order);
So the problem is the check PageHead is racy because at this point we already dropped our reference to the page. So even if we came in with compound page, the page can already be freed and PageHead can return false and we will end up freeing all the tail pages causing double free.(CVE-2023-52739)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
atl1c: Work around the DMA RX overflow issue
This is based on alx driver commit 881d0327db37 ("net: alx: Work around the DMA RX overflow issue").
The alx and atl1c drivers had RX overflow error which was why a custom allocator was created to avoid certain addresses. The simpler workaround then created for alx driver, but not for atl1c due to lack of tester.
Instead of using a custom allocator, check the allocated skb address and use skb_reserve() to move away from problematic 0x...fc0 address.
Tested on AR8131 on Acer 4540.(CVE-2023-52834)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hid: cp2112: Fix duplicate workqueue initialization
Previously the cp2112 driver called INIT_DELAYED_WORK within cp2112_gpio_irq_startup, resulting in duplicate initilizations of the workqueue on subsequent IRQ startups following an initial request. This resulted in a warning in set_work_data in workqueue.c, as well as a rare NULL dereference within process_one_work in workqueue.c.
Initialize the workqueue within _probe instead.(CVE-2023-52853)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: usb-audio: Stop parsing channels bits when all channels are found.
If a usb audio device sets more bits than the amount of channels it could write outside of the map array.(CVE-2024-27436)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: tc358743: register v4l2 async device only after successful setup
Ensure the device has been setup correctly before registering the v4l2 async device, thus allowing userspace to access.(CVE-2024-35830)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete
FFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue pending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the FFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a soft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks like the following:
DWC3 Gadget FFS Application
dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ... --> dwc3_stop_active_transfers() --> dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN) --> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel() --> usb_ep_free_request() --> usb_ep_dequeue()
There is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion handler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is running in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application. As the completion call frees the USB request (io_data->req) the FFS application is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can lead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.
commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently") relocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). However, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the spinlock can't be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as usb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the function driver's completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading into a deadlock.
Fix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to ffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data->req to NULL after freeing it within the ffs->eps_lock. This resolves the race condition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue attempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the ffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is done referencing it.
This fix depends on commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently")(CVE-2024-36894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: nl80211: don't free NULL coalescing rule
If the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firewire: ohci: mask bus reset interrupts between ISR and bottom half
In the FireWire OHCI interrupt handler, if a bus reset interrupt has occurred, mask bus reset interrupts until bus_reset_work has serviced and cleared the interrupt.
Normally, we always leave bus reset interrupts masked. We infer the bus reset from the self-ID interrupt that happens shortly thereafter. A scenario where we unmask bus reset interrupts was introduced in 2008 in a007bb857e0b26f5d8b73c2ff90782d9c0972620: If OHCI_PARAM_DEBUG_BUSRESETS (8) is set in the debug parameter bitmask, we will unmask bus reset interrupts so we can log them.
irq_handler logs the bus reset interrupt. However, we can't clear the bus reset event flag in irq_handler, because we won't service the event until later. irq_handler exits with the event flag still set. If the corresponding interrupt is still unmasked, the first bus reset will usually freeze the system due to irq_handler being called again each time it exits. This freeze can be reproduced by loading firewire_ohci with "modprobe firewire_ohci debug=-1" (to enable all debugging output). Apparently there are also some cases where bus_reset_work will get called soon enough to clear the event, and operation will continue normally.
This freeze was first reported a few months after a007bb85 was committed, but until now it was never fixed. The debug level could safely be set to -1 through sysfs after the module was loaded, but this would be ineffectual in logging bus reset interrupts since they were only unmasked during initialization.
irq_handler will now leave the event flag set but mask bus reset interrupts, so irq_handler won't be called again and there will be no freeze. If OHCI_PARAM_DEBUG_BUSRESETS is enabled, bus_reset_work will unmask the interrupt after servicing the event, so future interrupts will be caught as desired.
As a side effect to this change, OHCI_PARAM_DEBUG_BUSRESETS can now be enabled through sysfs in addition to during initial module loading. However, when enabled through sysfs, logging of bus reset interrupts will be effective only starting with the second bus reset, after bus_reset_work has executed.(CVE-2024-36950)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race
__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when sk->dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.
RCU rules are that we must first clear sk->sk_dst_cache, then call dst_release(old_dst).
Note that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly, while __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.
Given that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic against RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three ->negative_advice() existing methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.
Note the check against NULL dst is centralized in __dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate it in various callbacks.
Many thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.
This old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: bridge: xmit: make sure we have at least eth header len bytes
syzbot triggered an uninit value[1] error in bridge device's xmit path by sending a short (less than ETH_HLEN bytes) skb. To fix it check if we can actually pull that amount instead of assuming.
Tested with dropwatch: drop at: br_dev_xmit+0xb93/0x12d0 [bridge] (0xffffffffc06739b3) origin: software timestamp: Mon May 13 11:31:53 2024 778214037 nsec protocol: 0x88a8 length: 2 original length: 2 drop reason: PKT_TOO_SMALL
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65 br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547 __dev_queue_xmit+0x34db/0x5350 net/core/dev.c:4341 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline] __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2136 [inline] __bpf_redirect_common net/core/filter.c:2180 [inline] __bpf_redirect+0x14a6/0x1620 net/core/filter.c:2187 _bpfclone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2460 [inline] bpf_clone_redirect+0x328/0x470 net/core/filter.c:2432 _bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997 __bpf_prog_run512+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2238 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline] bpf_test_run+0x499/0xc30 net/bpf/test_run.c:425 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x14ea/0x1f20 net/bpf/test_run.c:1058 bpf_prog_test_run+0x6b7/0xad0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4269 __sys_bpf+0x6aa/0xd90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5678 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0xa0/0xe0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 x64_sys_call+0x96b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:322 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-38538)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
of: module: add buffer overflow check in of_modalias()
In of_modalias(), if the buffer happens to be too small even for the 1st snprintf() call, the len parameter will become negative and str parameter (if not NULL initially) will point beyond the buffer's end. Add the buffer overflow check after the 1st snprintf() call and fix such check after the strlen() call (accounting for the terminating NUL char).(CVE-2024-38541)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function
Fixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).
The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, an error message is logged and the function returns false to indicate an error.
Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-38552)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
KASAN reports a bug:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424 CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+ [...] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_report+0xcf/0x610 kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0 ftrace_location+0x90/0x120 register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40 kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example] do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0 do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0 load_module+0x3082/0x33d0 init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130 __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
The root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address is being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages at the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the corresponding module is being deleted:
CPU1 | CPU2
register_kprobes() { | delete_module() { check_kprobe_address_safe() { | arch_check_ftrace_location() { | ftrace_location() { | lookup_rec() // USE! | ftrace_release_mod() // Free!
To fix this issue: 1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range(); 2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in ftrace_location(); 3. Call synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages both in ftrace_process_locs()/ftrace_release_mod()/ftrace_free_mem().(CVE-2024-38588)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: Fix data races in unix_release_sock/unix_stream_sendmsg
A data-race condition has been identified in af_unix. In one data path, the write function unix_release_sock() atomically writes to sk->sk_shutdown using WRITE_ONCE. However, on the reader side, unix_stream_sendmsg() does not read it atomically. Consequently, this issue is causing the following KCSAN splat to occur:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in unix_release_sock / unix_stream_sendmsg
write (marked) to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 7270 on cpu 28:
unix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:640)
unix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050)
sock_close (net/socket.c:659 net/socket.c:1421)
__fput (fs/file_table.c:422)
__fput_sync (fs/file_table.c:508)
__se_sys_close (fs/open.c:1559 fs/open.c:1541)
__x64_sys_close (fs/open.c:1541)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
read to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 989 on cpu 14:
unix_stream_sendmsg (net/unix/af_unix.c:2273)
__sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:730 net/socket.c:745)
____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2584)
__sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2638 net/socket.c:2724)
__x64_sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2753 net/socket.c:2750 net/socket.c:2750)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
value changed: 0x01 -> 0x03
The line numbers are related to commit dd5a440a31fa ("Linux 6.9-rc7").
Commit e1d09c2c2f57 ("af_unix: Fix data races around sk->sk_shutdown.") addressed a comparable issue in the past regarding sk->sk_shutdown. However, it overlooked resolving this particular data path. This patch only offending unix_stream_sendmsg() function, since the other reads seem to be protected by unix_state_lock() as discussed in(CVE-2024-38596)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
macintosh/via-macii: Fix "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"
The via-macii ADB driver calls request_irq() after disabling hard interrupts. But disabling interrupts isn't necessary here because the VIA shift register interrupt was masked during VIA1 initialization.(CVE-2024-38607)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2406.4.0.0283.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: mcba_usb: fix memory leak in mcba_usb\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported memory leak in SocketCAN driver for Microchip CAN BUS\nAnalyzer Tool. The problem was in unfreed usb_coherent.\r\n\r\nIn mcba_usb_start() 20 coherent buffers are allocated and there is\nnothing, that frees them:\r\n\r\n1) In callback function the urb is resubmitted and that\u0026apos;s all\n2) In disconnect function urbs are simply killed, but URB_FREE_BUFFER\n is not set (see mcba_usb_start) and this flag cannot be used with\n coherent buffers.\r\n\r\nFail log:\n| [ 1354.053291][ T8413] mcba_usb 1-1:0.0 can0: device disconnected\n| [ 1367.059384][ T8420] kmemleak: 20 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmem)\r\n\r\nSo, all allocated buffers should be freed with usb_free_coherent()\nexplicitly\r\n\r\nNOTE:\nThe same pattern for allocating and freeing coherent buffers\nis used in drivers/net/can/usb/kvaser_usb/kvaser_usb_core.c(CVE-2021-47231)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: j1939: fix Use-after-Free, hold skb ref while in use\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes a Use-after-Free found by the syzbot.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that a skb is taken from the per-session skb queue,\nwithout incrementing the ref count. This leads to a Use-after-Free if\nthe skb is taken concurrently from the session queue due to a CTS.(CVE-2021-47232)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbatman-adv: Avoid WARN_ON timing related checks\r\n\r\nThe soft/batadv interface for a queued OGM can be changed during the time\nthe OGM was queued for transmission and when the OGM is actually\ntransmitted by the worker.\r\n\r\nBut WARN_ON must be used to denote kernel bugs and not to print simple\nwarnings. A warning can simply be printed using pr_warn.(CVE-2021-47252)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: ngene: Fix out-of-bounds bug in ngene_command_config_free_buf()\r\n\r\nFix an 11-year old bug in ngene_command_config_free_buf() while\naddressing the following warnings caught with -Warray-bounds:\r\n\r\narch/alpha/include/asm/string.h:22:16: warning: \u0026apos;__builtin_memcpy\u0026apos; offset [12, 16] from the object at \u0026apos;com\u0026apos; is out of the bounds of referenced subobject \u0026apos;config\u0026apos; with type \u0026apos;unsigned char\u0026apos; at offset 10 [-Warray-bounds]\narch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25: warning: \u0026apos;__builtin_memcpy\u0026apos; offset [12, 16] from the object at \u0026apos;com\u0026apos; is out of the bounds of referenced subobject \u0026apos;config\u0026apos; with type \u0026apos;unsigned char\u0026apos; at offset 10 [-Warray-bounds]\r\n\r\nThe problem is that the original code is trying to copy 6 bytes of\ndata into a one-byte size member _config_ of the wrong structue\nFW_CONFIGURE_BUFFERS, in a single call to memcpy(). This causes a\nlegitimate compiler warning because memcpy() overruns the length\nof \u0026amp;com.cmd.ConfigureBuffers.config. It seems that the right\nstructure is FW_CONFIGURE_FREE_BUFFERS, instead, because it contains\n6 more members apart from the header _hdr_. Also, the name of\nthe function ngene_command_config_free_buf() suggests that the actual\nintention is to ConfigureFreeBuffers, instead of ConfigureBuffers\n(which takes place in the function ngene_command_config_buf(), above).\r\n\r\nFix this by enclosing those 6 members of struct FW_CONFIGURE_FREE_BUFFERS\ninto new struct config, and use \u0026amp;com.cmd.ConfigureFreeBuffers.config as\nthe destination address, instead of \u0026amp;com.cmd.ConfigureBuffers.config,\nwhen calling memcpy().\r\n\r\nThis also helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable\n-Warray-bounds and get us closer to being able to tighten the\nFORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy().(CVE-2021-47288)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncoresight: tmc-etf: Fix global-out-of-bounds in tmc_update_etf_buffer()\r\n\r\ncommit 6f755e85c332 (\u0026quot;coresight: Add helper for inserting synchronization\npackets\u0026quot;) removed trailing \u0026apos;\\0\u0026apos; from barrier_pkt array and updated the\ncall sites like etb_update_buffer() to have proper checks for barrier_pkt\nsize before read but missed updating tmc_update_etf_buffer() which still\nreads barrier_pkt past the array size resulting in KASAN out-of-bounds\nbug. Fix this by adding a check for barrier_pkt size before accessing\nlike it is done in etb_update_buffer().\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in tmc_update_etf_buffer+0x4b8/0x698\n Read of size 4 at addr ffffffd05b7d1030 by task perf/2629\r\n\r\n Call trace:\n dump_backtrace+0x0/0x27c\n show_stack+0x20/0x2c\n dump_stack+0x11c/0x188\n print_address_description+0x3c/0x4a4\n __kasan_report+0x140/0x164\n kasan_report+0x10/0x18\n __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x1c/0x24\n tmc_update_etf_buffer+0x4b8/0x698\n etm_event_stop+0x248/0x2d8\n etm_event_del+0x20/0x2c\n event_sched_out+0x214/0x6f0\n group_sched_out+0xd0/0x270\n ctx_sched_out+0x2ec/0x518\n __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x4fc/0xe6c\n __schedule+0x1094/0x16a0\n preempt_schedule_irq+0x88/0x170\n arm64_preempt_schedule_irq+0xf0/0x18c\n el1_irq+0xe8/0x180\n perf_event_exec+0x4d8/0x56c\n setup_new_exec+0x204/0x400\n load_elf_binary+0x72c/0x18c0\n search_binary_handler+0x13c/0x420\n load_script+0x500/0x6c4\n search_binary_handler+0x13c/0x420\n exec_binprm+0x118/0x654\n __do_execve_file+0x77c/0xba4\n __arm64_compat_sys_execve+0x98/0xac\n el0_svc_common+0x1f8/0x5e0\n el0_svc_compat_handler+0x84/0xb0\n el0_svc_compat+0x10/0x50\r\n\r\n The buggy address belongs to the variable:\n barrier_pkt+0x10/0x40\r\n\r\n Memory state around the buggy address:\n ffffffd05b7d0f00: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00\n ffffffd05b7d0f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n \u0026gt;ffffffd05b7d1000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 03\n ^\n ffffffd05b7d1080: fa fa fa fa 00 02 fa fa fa fa fa fa 03 fa fa fa\n ffffffd05b7d1100: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa\n ==================================================================(CVE-2021-47346)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwl1251: Fix possible buffer overflow in wl1251_cmd_scan\r\n\r\nFunction wl1251_cmd_scan calls memcpy without checking the length.\nHarden by checking the length is within the maximum allowed size.(CVE-2021-47347)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxhci: Fix command ring pointer corruption while aborting a command\r\n\r\nThe command ring pointer is located at [6:63] bits of the command\nring control register (CRCR). All the control bits like command stop,\nabort are located at [0:3] bits. While aborting a command, we read the\nCRCR and set the abort bit and write to the CRCR. The read will always\ngive command ring pointer as all zeros. So we essentially write only\nthe control bits. Since we split the 64 bit write into two 32 bit writes,\nthere is a possibility of xHC command ring stopped before the upper\ndword (all zeros) is written. If that happens, xHC updates the upper\ndword of its internal command ring pointer with all zeros. Next time,\nwhen the command ring is restarted, we see xHC memory access failures.\nFix this issue by only writing to the lower dword of CRCR where all\ncontrol bits are located.(CVE-2021-47434)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm, slub: fix potential memoryleak in kmem_cache_open()\r\n\r\nIn error path, the random_seq of slub cache might be leaked. Fix this\nby using __kmem_cache_release() to release all the relevant resources.(CVE-2021-47466)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses\r\n\r\nCurrently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new\ndevices so that we can check that we\u0026apos;re not trying to reuse a chip\nselect that\u0026apos;s already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is\nitself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI\ndevices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate\nthose devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller\nand hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care\nabout concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per\ncontroller, avoiding the deadlock.\r\n\r\nThis can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.(CVE-2021-47469)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: fix race between searching chunks and release journal_head from buffer_head\r\n\r\nEncountered a race between ocfs2_test_bg_bit_allocatable() and\njbd2_journal_put_journal_head() resulting in the below vmcore.\r\n\r\n PID: 106879 TASK: ffff880244ba9c00 CPU: 2 COMMAND: \u0026quot;loop3\u0026quot;\n Call trace:\n panic\n oops_end\n no_context\n __bad_area_nosemaphore\n bad_area_nosemaphore\n __do_page_fault\n do_page_fault\n page_fault\n [exception RIP: ocfs2_block_group_find_clear_bits+316]\n ocfs2_block_group_find_clear_bits [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_cluster_group_search [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_search_chain [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits [ocfs2]\n __ocfs2_claim_clusters [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_claim_clusters [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_local_alloc_slide_window [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_reserve_clusters_with_limit [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_reserve_clusters [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_lock_refcount_allocators [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_make_clusters_writable [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_replace_cow [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_refcount_cow [ocfs2]\n ocfs2_file_write_iter [ocfs2]\n lo_rw_aio\n loop_queue_work\n kthread_worker_fn\n kthread\n ret_from_fork\r\n\r\nWhen ocfs2_test_bg_bit_allocatable() called bh2jh(bg_bh), the\nbg_bh-\u0026gt;b_private NULL as jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() raced and\nreleased the jounal head from the buffer head. Needed to take bit lock\nfor the bit \u0026apos;BH_JournalHead\u0026apos; to fix this race.(CVE-2021-47493)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niio: mma8452: Fix trigger reference couting\r\n\r\nThe mma8452 driver directly assigns a trigger to the struct iio_dev. The\nIIO core when done using this trigger will call `iio_trigger_put()` to drop\nthe reference count by 1.\r\n\r\nWithout the matching `iio_trigger_get()` in the driver the reference count\ncan reach 0 too early, the trigger gets freed while still in use and a\nuse-after-free occurs.\r\n\r\nFix this by getting a reference to the trigger before assigning it to the\nIIO device.(CVE-2021-47500)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: sja1000: fix use after free in ems_pcmcia_add_card()\r\n\r\nIf the last channel is not available then \u0026quot;dev\u0026quot; is freed. Fortunately,\nwe can just use \u0026quot;pdev-\u0026gt;irq\u0026quot; instead.\r\n\r\nAlso we should check if at least one channel was set up.(CVE-2021-47521)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: mpt3sas: Fix kernel panic during drive powercycle test\r\n\r\nWhile looping over shost\u0026apos;s sdev list it is possible that one\nof the drives is getting removed and its sas_target object is\nfreed but its sdev object remains intact.\r\n\r\nConsequently, a kernel panic can occur while the driver is trying to access\nthe sas_address field of sas_target object without also checking the\nsas_target object for NULL.(CVE-2021-47565)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ninet_diag: fix kernel-infoleak for UDP sockets\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported a kernel-infoleak [1], that can exploited\nby unpriv users.\r\n\r\nAfter analysis it turned out UDP was not initializing\nr-\u0026gt;idiag_expires. Other users of inet_sk_diag_fill()\nmight make the same mistake in the future, so fix this\nin inet_sk_diag_fill().\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:121 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copyout lib/iov_iter.c:156 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x69d/0x25c0 lib/iov_iter.c:670\n instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:121 [inline]\n copyout lib/iov_iter.c:156 [inline]\n _copy_to_iter+0x69d/0x25c0 lib/iov_iter.c:670\n copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:155 [inline]\n simple_copy_to_iter+0xf3/0x140 net/core/datagram.c:519\n __skb_datagram_iter+0x2cb/0x1280 net/core/datagram.c:425\n skb_copy_datagram_iter+0xdc/0x270 net/core/datagram.c:533\n skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:3657 [inline]\n netlink_recvmsg+0x660/0x1c60 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1974\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:944 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:962 [inline]\n sock_read_iter+0x5a9/0x630 net/socket.c:1035\n call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2156 [inline]\n new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:400 [inline]\n vfs_read+0x1631/0x1980 fs/read_write.c:481\n ksys_read+0x28c/0x520 fs/read_write.c:619\n __do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:629 [inline]\n __se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:627 [inline]\n __x64_sys_read+0xdb/0x120 fs/read_write.c:627\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:524 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3251 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xe0c/0x1510 mm/slub.c:4974\n kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:354 [inline]\n __alloc_skb+0x545/0xf90 net/core/skbuff.c:426\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1126 [inline]\n netlink_dump+0x3d5/0x16a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2245\n __netlink_dump_start+0xd1c/0xee0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2370\n netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:254 [inline]\n inet_diag_handler_cmd+0x2e7/0x400 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1343\n sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x24a/0x620\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x447/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2491\n sock_diag_rcv+0x63/0x80 net/core/sock_diag.c:276\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0x1095/0x1360 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345\n netlink_sendmsg+0x16f3/0x1870 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1916\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:724 [inline]\n sock_write_iter+0x594/0x690 net/socket.c:1057\n do_iter_readv_writev+0xa7f/0xc70\n do_iter_write+0x52c/0x1500 fs/read_write.c:851\n vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:924 [inline]\n do_writev+0x63f/0xe30 fs/read_write.c:967\n __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1040 [inline]\n __se_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1037 [inline]\n __x64_sys_writev+0xe5/0x120 fs/read_write.c:1037\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\r\n\r\nBytes 68-71 of 312 are uninitialized\nMemory access of size 312 starts at ffff88812ab54000\nData copied to user address 0000000020001440\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 6365 Comm: syz-executor801 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc3-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011(CVE-2021-47597)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfirmware: arm_scpi: Fix string overflow in SCPI genpd driver\r\n\r\nWithout the bound checks for scpi_pd-\u0026gt;name, it could result in the buffer\noverflow when copying the SCPI device name from the corresponding device\ntree node as the name string is set at maximum size of 30.\r\n\r\nLet us fix it by using devm_kasprintf so that the string buffer is\nallocated dynamically.(CVE-2021-47609)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()\r\n\r\nWe don\u0026apos;t currently validate that the values being set are within the range\nwe advertised to userspace as being valid, do so and reject any values\nthat are out of range.(CVE-2022-48737)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npowerpc64/bpf: Limit \u0026apos;ldbrx\u0026apos; to processors compliant with ISA v2.06\r\n\r\nJohan reported the below crash with test_bpf on ppc64 e5500:\r\n\r\n test_bpf: #296 ALU_END_FROM_LE 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -\u0026gt; 0x67452301 jited:1\n Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]\n BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500\n Modules linked in: test_bpf(+)\n CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty #1\n NIP: 8000000000061c3c LR: 80000000006dea64 CTR: 8000000000061c18\n REGS: c0000000032d3420 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty)\n MSR: 0000000080089000 \u0026lt;EE,ME\u0026gt; CR: 88002822 XER: 20000000 IRQMASK: 0\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n NIP [8000000000061c3c] 0x8000000000061c3c\n LR [80000000006dea64] .__run_one+0x104/0x17c [test_bpf]\n Call Trace:\n .__run_one+0x60/0x17c [test_bpf] (unreliable)\n .test_bpf_init+0x6a8/0xdc8 [test_bpf]\n .do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x28c\n .do_init_module+0x68/0x28c\n .load_module+0x2460/0x2abc\n .__do_sys_init_module+0x120/0x18c\n .system_call_exception+0x110/0x1b8\n system_call_common+0xf0/0x210\n --- interrupt: c00 at 0x101d0acc\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n ---[ end trace 47b2bf19090bb3d0 ]---\r\n\r\n Illegal instruction\r\n\r\nThe illegal instruction turned out to be \u0026apos;ldbrx\u0026apos; emitted for\nBPF_FROM_[L|B]E, which was only introduced in ISA v2.06. Guard use of\nthe same and implement an alternative approach for older processors.(CVE-2022-48755)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/msm/dsi: invalid parameter check in msm_dsi_phy_enable\r\n\r\nThe function performs a check on the \u0026quot;phy\u0026quot; input parameter, however, it\nis used before the check.\r\n\r\nInitialize the \u0026quot;dev\u0026quot; variable after the sanity check to avoid a possible\nNULL pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nAddresses-Coverity-ID: 1493860 (\u0026quot;Null pointer dereference\u0026quot;)(CVE-2022-48756)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrpmsg: virtio: Free driver_override when rpmsg_remove()\r\n\r\nFree driver_override when rpmsg_remove(), otherwise\nthe following memory leak will occur:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff0000d55d7080 (size 128):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/u8:2\u0026quot;, pid 56, jiffies 4294893188 (age 214.272s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 72 70 6d 73 67 5f 6e 73 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 rpmsg_ns........\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009c94c9c1\u0026gt;] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1f8/0x320\n [\u0026lt;000000002300d89b\u0026gt;] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x44/0x70\n [\u0026lt;00000000228a60c3\u0026gt;] kstrndup+0x4c/0x90\n [\u0026lt;0000000077158695\u0026gt;] driver_set_override+0xd0/0x164\n [\u0026lt;000000003e9c4ea5\u0026gt;] rpmsg_register_device_override+0x98/0x170\n [\u0026lt;000000001c0c89a8\u0026gt;] rpmsg_ns_register_device+0x24/0x30\n [\u0026lt;000000008bbf8fa2\u0026gt;] rpmsg_probe+0x2e0/0x3ec\n [\u0026lt;00000000e65a68df\u0026gt;] virtio_dev_probe+0x1c0/0x280\n [\u0026lt;00000000443331cc\u0026gt;] really_probe+0xbc/0x2dc\n [\u0026lt;00000000391064b1\u0026gt;] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0\n [\u0026lt;00000000a41c9a5b\u0026gt;] driver_probe_device+0xd8/0x160\n [\u0026lt;000000009c3bd5df\u0026gt;] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x140\n [\u0026lt;0000000043cd7614\u0026gt;] bus_for_each_drv+0x7c/0xd4\n [\u0026lt;000000003b929a36\u0026gt;] __device_attach+0x9c/0x19c\n [\u0026lt;00000000a94e0ba8\u0026gt;] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20\n [\u0026lt;000000003c999637\u0026gt;] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xac(CVE-2023-52670)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nFix page corruption caused by racy check in __free_pages\r\n\r\nWhen we upgraded our kernel, we started seeing some page corruption like\nthe following consistently:\r\n\r\n BUG: Bad page state in process ganesha.nfsd pfn:1304ca\n page:0000000022261c55 refcount:0 mapcount:-128 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1304ca\n flags: 0x17ffffc0000000()\n raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffff8a513ffd4c98 ffffeee24b35ec08 0000000000000000\n raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 00000000ffffff7f 0000000000000000\n page dumped because: nonzero mapcount\n CPU: 0 PID: 15567 Comm: ganesha.nfsd Kdump: loaded Tainted: P B O 5.10.158-1.nutanix.20221209.el7.x86_64 #1\n Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/05/2016\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack+0x74/0x96\n bad_page.cold+0x63/0x94\n check_new_page_bad+0x6d/0x80\n rmqueue+0x46e/0x970\n get_page_from_freelist+0xcb/0x3f0\n ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x40\n __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x164/0x300\n alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xf0\n skb_page_frag_refill+0x84/0x110\n ...\r\n\r\nSometimes, it would also show up as corruption in the free list pointer\nand cause crashes.\r\n\r\nAfter bisecting the issue, we found the issue started from commit\ne320d3012d25 (\u0026quot;mm/page_alloc.c: fix freeing non-compound pages\u0026quot;):\r\n\r\n\tif (put_page_testzero(page))\n\t\tfree_the_page(page, order);\n\telse if (!PageHead(page))\n\t\twhile (order-- \u0026gt; 0)\n\t\t\tfree_the_page(page + (1 \u0026lt;\u0026lt; order), order);\r\n\r\nSo the problem is the check PageHead is racy because at this point we\nalready dropped our reference to the page. So even if we came in with\ncompound page, the page can already be freed and PageHead can return\nfalse and we will end up freeing all the tail pages causing double free.(CVE-2023-52739)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\natl1c: Work around the DMA RX overflow issue\r\n\r\nThis is based on alx driver commit 881d0327db37 (\u0026quot;net: alx: Work around\nthe DMA RX overflow issue\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nThe alx and atl1c drivers had RX overflow error which was why a custom\nallocator was created to avoid certain addresses. The simpler workaround\nthen created for alx driver, but not for atl1c due to lack of tester.\r\n\r\nInstead of using a custom allocator, check the allocated skb address and\nuse skb_reserve() to move away from problematic 0x...fc0 address.\r\n\r\nTested on AR8131 on Acer 4540.(CVE-2023-52834)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhid: cp2112: Fix duplicate workqueue initialization\r\n\r\nPreviously the cp2112 driver called INIT_DELAYED_WORK within\ncp2112_gpio_irq_startup, resulting in duplicate initilizations of the\nworkqueue on subsequent IRQ startups following an initial request. This\nresulted in a warning in set_work_data in workqueue.c, as well as a rare\nNULL dereference within process_one_work in workqueue.c.\r\n\r\nInitialize the workqueue within _probe instead.(CVE-2023-52853)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: usb-audio: Stop parsing channels bits when all channels are found.\r\n\r\nIf a usb audio device sets more bits than the amount of channels\nit could write outside of the map array.(CVE-2024-27436)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: tc358743: register v4l2 async device only after successful setup\r\n\r\nEnsure the device has been setup correctly before registering the v4l2\nasync device, thus allowing userspace to access.(CVE-2024-35830)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete\r\n\r\nFFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue\npending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the\nFFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a\nsoft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks\nlike the following:\r\n\r\n DWC3 Gadget FFS Application\ndwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ...\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_stop_active_transfers()\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN)\n --\u0026gt; ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel()\n --\u0026gt; usb_ep_free_request() --\u0026gt; usb_ep_dequeue()\r\n\r\nThere is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion\nhandler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is\nrunning in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application.\nAs the completion call frees the USB request (io_data-\u0026gt;req) the FFS\napplication is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can\nlead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.\r\n\r\ncommit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status consistently\u0026quot;)\nrelocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete().\nHowever, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the\nspinlock can\u0026apos;t be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as\nusb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the\nfunction driver\u0026apos;s completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading\ninto a deadlock.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to\nffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data-\u0026gt;req\nto NULL after freeing it within the ffs-\u0026gt;eps_lock. This resolves the race\ncondition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue\nattempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the\nffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is\ndone referencing it.\r\n\r\nThis fix depends on\n commit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status\n consistently\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: nl80211: don\u0026apos;t free NULL coalescing rule\r\n\r\nIf the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfirewire: ohci: mask bus reset interrupts between ISR and bottom half\r\n\r\nIn the FireWire OHCI interrupt handler, if a bus reset interrupt has\noccurred, mask bus reset interrupts until bus_reset_work has serviced and\ncleared the interrupt.\r\n\r\nNormally, we always leave bus reset interrupts masked. We infer the bus\nreset from the self-ID interrupt that happens shortly thereafter. A\nscenario where we unmask bus reset interrupts was introduced in 2008 in\na007bb857e0b26f5d8b73c2ff90782d9c0972620: If\nOHCI_PARAM_DEBUG_BUSRESETS (8) is set in the debug parameter bitmask, we\nwill unmask bus reset interrupts so we can log them.\r\n\r\nirq_handler logs the bus reset interrupt. However, we can\u0026apos;t clear the bus\nreset event flag in irq_handler, because we won\u0026apos;t service the event until\nlater. irq_handler exits with the event flag still set. If the\ncorresponding interrupt is still unmasked, the first bus reset will\nusually freeze the system due to irq_handler being called again each\ntime it exits. This freeze can be reproduced by loading firewire_ohci\nwith \u0026quot;modprobe firewire_ohci debug=-1\u0026quot; (to enable all debugging output).\nApparently there are also some cases where bus_reset_work will get called\nsoon enough to clear the event, and operation will continue normally.\r\n\r\nThis freeze was first reported a few months after a007bb85 was committed,\nbut until now it was never fixed. The debug level could safely be set\nto -1 through sysfs after the module was loaded, but this would be\nineffectual in logging bus reset interrupts since they were only\nunmasked during initialization.\r\n\r\nirq_handler will now leave the event flag set but mask bus reset\ninterrupts, so irq_handler won\u0026apos;t be called again and there will be no\nfreeze. If OHCI_PARAM_DEBUG_BUSRESETS is enabled, bus_reset_work will\nunmask the interrupt after servicing the event, so future interrupts\nwill be caught as desired.\r\n\r\nAs a side effect to this change, OHCI_PARAM_DEBUG_BUSRESETS can now be\nenabled through sysfs in addition to during initial module loading.\nHowever, when enabled through sysfs, logging of bus reset interrupts will\nbe effective only starting with the second bus reset, after\nbus_reset_work has executed.(CVE-2024-36950)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix __dst_negative_advice() race\r\n\r\n__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when\nsk-\u0026gt;dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.\r\n\r\nRCU rules are that we must first clear sk-\u0026gt;sk_dst_cache,\nthen call dst_release(old_dst).\r\n\r\nNote that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly,\nwhile __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.\r\n\r\nGiven that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic\nagainst RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three -\u0026gt;negative_advice()\nexisting methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.\r\n\r\nNote the check against NULL dst is centralized in\n__dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate\nit in various callbacks.\r\n\r\nMany thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.\r\n\r\nThis old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: bridge: xmit: make sure we have at least eth header len bytes\r\n\r\nsyzbot triggered an uninit value[1] error in bridge device\u0026apos;s xmit path\nby sending a short (less than ETH_HLEN bytes) skb. To fix it check if\nwe can actually pull that amount instead of assuming.\r\n\r\nTested with dropwatch:\n drop at: br_dev_xmit+0xb93/0x12d0 [bridge] (0xffffffffc06739b3)\n origin: software\n timestamp: Mon May 13 11:31:53 2024 778214037 nsec\n protocol: 0x88a8\n length: 2\n original length: 2\n drop reason: PKT_TOO_SMALL\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65\n br_dev_xmit+0x61d/0x1cb0 net/bridge/br_device.c:65\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4903 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4917 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3531 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x247/0xa20 net/core/dev.c:3547\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x34db/0x5350 net/core/dev.c:4341\n dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3091 [inline]\n __bpf_tx_skb net/core/filter.c:2136 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect_common net/core/filter.c:2180 [inline]\n __bpf_redirect+0x14a6/0x1620 net/core/filter.c:2187\n ____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2460 [inline]\n bpf_clone_redirect+0x328/0x470 net/core/filter.c:2432\n ___bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997\n __bpf_prog_run512+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2238\n bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]\n __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]\n bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]\n bpf_test_run+0x499/0xc30 net/bpf/test_run.c:425\n bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x14ea/0x1f20 net/bpf/test_run.c:1058\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x6b7/0xad0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4269\n __sys_bpf+0x6aa/0xd90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5678\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0xa0/0xe0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765\n x64_sys_call+0x96b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:322\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-38538)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nof: module: add buffer overflow check in of_modalias()\r\n\r\nIn of_modalias(), if the buffer happens to be too small even for the 1st\nsnprintf() call, the len parameter will become negative and str parameter\n(if not NULL initially) will point beyond the buffer\u0026apos;s end. Add the buffer\noverflow check after the 1st snprintf() call and fix such check after the\nstrlen() call (accounting for the terminating NUL char).(CVE-2024-38541)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\r\n\r\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\r\n\r\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\r\n\r\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-38552)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()\r\n\r\nKASAN reports a bug:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424\n CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0\n print_report+0xcf/0x610\n kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0\n ftrace_location+0x90/0x120\n register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40\n kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example]\n do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0\n do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0\n load_module+0x3082/0x33d0\n init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130\n __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440\n do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79\r\n\r\nThe root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address\nis being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages\nat the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the\ncorresponding module is being deleted:\r\n\r\n CPU1 | CPU2\n register_kprobes() { | delete_module() {\n check_kprobe_address_safe() { |\n arch_check_ftrace_location() { |\n ftrace_location() { |\n lookup_rec() // USE! | ftrace_release_mod() // Free!\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue:\n 1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range();\n 2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in\n ftrace_location();\n 3. Call synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages both in\n ftrace_process_locs()/ftrace_release_mod()/ftrace_free_mem().(CVE-2024-38588)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\naf_unix: Fix data races in unix_release_sock/unix_stream_sendmsg\r\n\r\nA data-race condition has been identified in af_unix. In one data path,\nthe write function unix_release_sock() atomically writes to\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown using WRITE_ONCE. However, on the reader side,\nunix_stream_sendmsg() does not read it atomically. Consequently, this\nissue is causing the following KCSAN splat to occur:\r\n\r\n\tBUG: KCSAN: data-race in unix_release_sock / unix_stream_sendmsg\r\n\r\n\twrite (marked) to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 7270 on cpu 28:\n\tunix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:640)\n\tunix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050)\n\tsock_close (net/socket.c:659 net/socket.c:1421)\n\t__fput (fs/file_table.c:422)\n\t__fput_sync (fs/file_table.c:508)\n\t__se_sys_close (fs/open.c:1559 fs/open.c:1541)\n\t__x64_sys_close (fs/open.c:1541)\n\tx64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)\n\tdo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)\n\tentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\n\tread to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 989 on cpu 14:\n\tunix_stream_sendmsg (net/unix/af_unix.c:2273)\n\t__sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:730 net/socket.c:745)\n\t____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2584)\n\t__sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2638 net/socket.c:2724)\n\t__x64_sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2753 net/socket.c:2750 net/socket.c:2750)\n\tx64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)\n\tdo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)\n\tentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\n\tvalue changed: 0x01 -\u0026gt; 0x03\r\n\r\nThe line numbers are related to commit dd5a440a31fa (\u0026quot;Linux 6.9-rc7\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nCommit e1d09c2c2f57 (\u0026quot;af_unix: Fix data races around sk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown.\u0026quot;)\naddressed a comparable issue in the past regarding sk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown.\nHowever, it overlooked resolving this particular data path.\nThis patch only offending unix_stream_sendmsg() function, since the\nother reads seem to be protected by unix_state_lock() as discussed in(CVE-2024-38596)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmacintosh/via-macii: Fix \u0026quot;BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nThe via-macii ADB driver calls request_irq() after disabling hard\ninterrupts. But disabling interrupts isn\u0026apos;t necessary here because the\nVIA shift register interrupt was masked during VIA1 initialization.(CVE-2024-38607)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1767",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:14Z",
"published": "2024-06-28T11:07:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1767"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47232"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47252"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47288"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47346"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47347"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47434"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47469"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47493"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47521"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47565"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47597"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47609"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48737"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48755"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48756"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27436"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35830"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38607"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47231",
"CVE-2021-47232",
"CVE-2021-47252",
"CVE-2021-47288",
"CVE-2021-47346",
"CVE-2021-47347",
"CVE-2021-47434",
"CVE-2021-47466",
"CVE-2021-47469",
"CVE-2021-47493",
"CVE-2021-47500",
"CVE-2021-47521",
"CVE-2021-47565",
"CVE-2021-47597",
"CVE-2021-47609",
"CVE-2022-48737",
"CVE-2022-48755",
"CVE-2022-48756",
"CVE-2023-52670",
"CVE-2023-52739",
"CVE-2023-52834",
"CVE-2023-52853",
"CVE-2024-27436",
"CVE-2024-35830",
"CVE-2024-36894",
"CVE-2024-36941",
"CVE-2024-36950",
"CVE-2024-36971",
"CVE-2024-38538",
"CVE-2024-38541",
"CVE-2024-38552",
"CVE-2024-38588",
"CVE-2024-38596",
"CVE-2024-38607"
]
}
OESA-2024-1836 (CVE-2022-48772)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-07-12 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def
The driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.
The following log reveals it:
[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414 [ 29.612820] Call Trace: [ 29.613030] <TASK> [ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7 [ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190 [ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0 [ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60 [ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310 [ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline
The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the original CPU.
When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU, but the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately reclaimed. Instead, apicd->move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming process is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.
Upon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU, irq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU's vector_cleanup list if it remains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its vector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.
However, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the interrupt triggers again on the new CPU.
In that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU to reclaim the old apicd->prev_vector because the interrupt isn't currently affine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even though __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it doesn't reclaim apicd->prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both apicd->move_in_progress and apicd->prev_vector to 0.
As a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a CPU vector leak.
To address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move() before the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd->prev_vector, if the interrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.
Additionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well, following a warning message, although theoretically it should never see apicd->move_in_progress with apicd->prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tls: fix missing memory barrier in tls_init
In tls_init(), a write memory barrier is missing, and store-store reordering may cause NULL dereference in tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}.
CPU0 CPU1 ----- ----- // In tls_init() // In tls_ctx_create() ctx = kzalloc() ctx->sk_proto = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot) -(1)
// In update_sk_prot() WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, tls_prots) -(2)
// In sock_common_setsockopt()
READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)->setsockopt()
// In tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}()
ctx->sk_proto->setsockopt() -(3)
In the above scenario, when (1) and (2) are reordered, (3) can observe the NULL value of ctx->sk_proto, causing NULL dereference.
To fix it, we rely on rcu_assign_pointer() which implies the release barrier semantic. By moving rcu_assign_pointer() after ctx->sk_proto is initialized, we can ensure that ctx->sk_proto are visible when changing sk->sk_prot.(CVE-2024-36489)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
amd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted
If there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first device will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes on all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will start reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been evicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page fault.(CVE-2024-36949)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Move NPIV's transport unregistration to after resource clean up
There are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes the NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is unregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the fabric.
Currently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including the fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport object. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and LOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.
Fix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID and LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ks8851: Queue RX packets in IRQ handler instead of disabling BHs
Currently the driver uses local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() in its IRQ handler to avoid triggering net_rx_action() softirq on exit from netif_rx(). The net_rx_action() could trigger this driver .start_xmit callback, which is protected by the same lock as the IRQ handler, so calling the .start_xmit from netif_rx() from the IRQ handler critical section protected by the lock could lead to an attempt to claim the already claimed lock, and a hang.
The local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() approach works only in case the IRQ handler is protected by a spinlock, but does not work if the IRQ handler is protected by mutex, i.e. this works for KS8851 with Parallel bus interface, but not for KS8851 with SPI bus interface.
Remove the BH manipulation and instead of calling netif_rx() inside the IRQ handler code protected by the lock, queue all the received SKBs in the IRQ handler into a queue first, and once the IRQ handler exits the critical section protected by the lock, dequeue all the queued SKBs and push them all into netif_rx(). At this point, it is safe to trigger the net_rx_action() softirq, since the netif_rx() call is outside of the lock that protects the IRQ handler.(CVE-2024-36962)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: mediatek: Make sure IPI buffer fits in L2TCM
The IPI buffer location is read from the firmware that we load to the System Companion Processor, and it's not granted that both the SRAM (L2TCM) size that is defined in the devicetree node is large enough for that, and while this is especially true for multi-core SCP, it's still useful to check on single-core variants as well.
Failing to perform this check may make this driver perform R/W operations out of the L2TCM boundary, resulting (at best) in a kernel panic.
To fix that, check that the IPI buffer fits, otherwise return a failure and refuse to boot the relevant SCP core (or the SCP at all, if this is single core).(CVE-2024-36965)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
virtio: delete vq in vp_find_vqs_msix() when request_irq() fails
When request_irq() fails, error path calls vp_del_vqs(). There, as vq is present in the list, free_irq() is called for the same vector. That causes following splat:
[ 0.414355] Trying to free already-free IRQ 27 [ 0.414403] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1899 free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414510] Modules linked in: [ 0.414540] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #27 [ 0.414540] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 [ 0.414540] RIP: 0010:free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] Code: 1e 00 48 83 c4 08 48 89 e8 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 90 8b 74 24 04 48 c7 c7 98 80 6c b1 e8 00 c9 f7 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 89 ee 4c 89 ef e8 e0 20 b8 00 49 8b 47 40 48 8b 40 [ 0.414540] RSP: 0000:ffffb71480013ae0 EFLAGS: 00010086 [ 0.414540] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa099c2722000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 0.414540] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffb71480013998 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 0.414540] RBP: 0000000000000246 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: 0000000000000001 [ 0.414540] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffffb18729c0 R12: ffffa099c1c91760 [ 0.414540] R13: ffffa099c1c916a4 R14: ffffa099c1d2f200 R15: ffffa099c1c91600 [ 0.414540] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa099fec40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.414540] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.414540] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000008e3e001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 0.414540] Call Trace: [ 0.414540] <TASK> [ 0.414540] ? __warn+0x80/0x120 [ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190 [ 0.414540] ? handle_bug+0x3b/0x70 [ 0.414540] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 0.414540] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] vp_del_vqs+0xc1/0x220 [ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs_msix+0x305/0x470 [ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs+0x3e/0x1a0 [ 0.414540] vp_modern_find_vqs+0x1b/0x70 [ 0.414540] init_vqs+0x387/0x600 [ 0.414540] virtnet_probe+0x50a/0xc80 [ 0.414540] virtio_dev_probe+0x1e0/0x2b0 [ 0.414540] really_probe+0xc0/0x2c0 [ 0.414540] ? __pfxdriverattach+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] driver_probe_device+0x73/0x120 [ 0.414540] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xe0 [ 0.414540] __driver_attach+0x88/0x180 [ 0.414540] bus_for_each_dev+0x85/0xd0 [ 0.414540] bus_add_driver+0xec/0x1f0 [ 0.414540] driver_register+0x59/0x100 [ 0.414540] ? __pfx_virtio_net_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] virtio_net_driver_init+0x90/0xb0 [ 0.414540] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x230 [ 0.414540] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] kernel_init+0x1a/0x1c0 [ 0.414540] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 [ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 0.414540] </TASK>
Fix this by calling deleting the current vq when request_irq() fails.(CVE-2024-37353)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix crash on racing fsync and size-extending write into prealloc
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in btrfs_set_item_key_safe():
BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]
With the following stack trace:
#0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4) #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4) #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9) #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9) #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9) #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8) #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8) #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8) #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9) #9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9) #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9) #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9) #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14) #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7) #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree, triggering the BUG().
This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py) to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:
>>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"]) leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610 leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16) item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192 item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 ...
So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5 (8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and item 5 starts at i_size.
Here is the state of ---truncated---(CVE-2024-37354)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in dctcp_update_alpha().
In dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g as follows:
alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha >> dctcp_shift_g); ... delivered_ce <<= (10 - dctcp_shift_g);
It seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered shift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g:
memcpy((void)0x20000080, "/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\000", 47); res = syscall(__NR_openat, /fd=/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /file=/0x20000080ul, /flags=/2ul, /mode=/0ul); memcpy((void)0x20000000, "100\000", 4); syscall(__NR_write, /fd=/r[0], /val=/0x20000000ul, /len=/4ul);
Let's limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax().
With this patch:
# echo 10 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g 10 # echo 11 > /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[0]: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12 shift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') CPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468 dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143 tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline] tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline] __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983 release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549 mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907 mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976 __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072 mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127 inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878 do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c. RSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0 R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 </TASK>(CVE-2024-37356)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: mediatek: Assign dummy when codec not specified for a DAI link
MediaTek sound card drivers are checking whether a DAI link is present and used on a board to assign the correct parameters and this is done by checking the codec DAI names at probe time.
If no real codec is present, assign the dummy codec to the DAI link to avoid NULL pointer during string comparison.(CVE-2024-38551)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function
Fixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).
The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, an error message is logged and the function returns false to indicate an error.
Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-38552)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device
There is a reference count leak issue of the object "net_device" in ax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one or zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause memory leak.
In order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of net_device after dev->ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Discard command completions in internal error
Fix use after free when FW completion arrives while device is in internal error state. Avoid calling completion handler in this case, since the device will flush the command interface and trigger all completions manually.
Kernel log: ------------[ cut here ]------------ refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. ... RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn+0x79/0x120 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 ? report_bug+0x17c/0x190 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x60 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0 cmd_ent_put+0x13b/0x160 [mlx5_core] mlx5_cmd_comp_handler+0x5f9/0x670 [mlx5_core] cmd_comp_notifier+0x1f/0x30 [mlx5_core] notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 mlx5_eq_async_int+0xf6/0x290 [mlx5_core] notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 irq_int_handler+0x19/0x30 [mlx5_core] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4b/0x160 handle_irq_event+0x2e/0x80 handle_edge_irq+0x98/0x230 __common_interrupt+0x3b/0xa0 common_interrupt+0x7b/0xa0 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40(CVE-2024-38555)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: nl80211: Avoid address calculations via out of bounds array indexing
Before request->channels[] can be used, request->n_channels must be set. Additionally, address calculations for memory after the "channels" array need to be calculated from the allocation base ("request") rather than via the first "out of bounds" index of "channels", otherwise run-time bounds checking will throw a warning.(CVE-2024-38562)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Add BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB attach type enforcement in BPF_LINK_CREATE
bpf_prog_attach uses attach_type_to_prog_type to enforce proper attach type for BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB. link_create uses bpf_prog_get and relies on bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type to properly verify prog_type <> attach_type association.
Add missing attach_type enforcement for the link_create case. Otherwise, it's currently possible to attach cgroup_skb prog types to other cgroup hooks.(CVE-2024-38564)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rcu-tasks: Fix show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread buffer overflow
There is a possibility of buffer overflow in show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed to sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this are unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still possible.
Use snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38577)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic
In spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len instead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the buffer boundaries. Fix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()
Syzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called during nilfs2 unmount.
Analysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which synchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after nilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace below:
nilfs_detach_log_writer nilfs_segctor_destroy nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --> Shut down log writer thread flush_work nilfs_iput_work_func nilfs_dispose_list iput nilfs_evict_inode nilfs_transaction_commit nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync) nilfs_segctor_sync --> Attempt to synchronize with log writer thread *** DEADLOCK ***
Fix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer thread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by forcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread terminates.
The skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the subsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
KASAN reports a bug:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424 CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+ [...] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 print_report+0xcf/0x610 kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0 ftrace_location+0x90/0x120 register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40 kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example] do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0 do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0 load_module+0x3082/0x33d0 init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130 __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
The root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address is being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages at the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the corresponding module is being deleted:
CPU1 | CPU2
register_kprobes() { | delete_module() { check_kprobe_address_safe() { | arch_check_ftrace_location() { | ftrace_location() { | lookup_rec() // USE! | ftrace_release_mod() // Free!
To fix this issue: 1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range(); 2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in ftrace_location(); 3. Call synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages both in ftrace_process_locs()/ftrace_release_mod()/ftrace_free_mem().(CVE-2024-38588)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: fix resync softlockup when bitmap size is less than array size
Is is reported that for dm-raid10, lvextend + lvchange --syncaction will trigger following softlockup:
kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 26s! [mdX_resync:6976] CPU: 7 PID: 3588 Comm: mdX_resync Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240419 #1 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x13/0x30 Call Trace: <TASK> md_bitmap_start_sync+0x6b/0xf0 raid10_sync_request+0x25c/0x1b40 [raid10] md_do_sync+0x64b/0x1020 md_thread+0xa7/0x170 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
And the detailed process is as follows:
md_do_sync j = mddev->resync_min while (j < max_sectors) sectors = raid10_sync_request(mddev, j, &skipped) if (!md_bitmap_start_sync(..., &sync_blocks)) // md_bitmap_start_sync set sync_blocks to 0 return sync_blocks + sectors_skippe; // sectors = 0; j += sectors; // j never change
Root cause is that commit 301867b1c168 ("md/raid10: check slab-out-of-bounds in md_bitmap_get_counter") return early from md_bitmap_get_counter(), without setting returned blocks.
Fix this problem by always set returned blocks from md_bitmap_get_counter"(), as it used to be.
Noted that this patch just fix the softlockup problem in kernel, the case that bitmap size doesn't match array size still need to be fixed.(CVE-2024-38598)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jffs2: prevent xattr node from overflowing the eraseblock
Add a check to make sure that the requested xattr node size is no larger than the eraseblock minus the cleanmarker.
Unlike the usual inode nodes, the xattr nodes aren't split into parts and spread across multiple eraseblocks, which means that a xattr node must not occupy more than one eraseblock. If the requested xattr value is too large, the xattr node can spill onto the next eraseblock, overwriting the nodes and causing errors such as:
jffs2: argh. node added in wrong place at 0x0000b050(2) jffs2: nextblock 0x0000a000, expected at 0000b00c jffs2: error: (823) do_verify_xattr_datum: node CRC failed at 0x01e050, read=0xfc892c93, calc=0x000000 jffs2: notice: (823) jffs2_get_inode_nodes: Node header CRC failed at 0x01e00c. {848f,2fc4,0fef511f,59a3d171} jffs2: Node at 0x0000000c with length 0x00001044 would run over the end of the erase block jffs2: Perhaps the file system was created with the wrong erase size? jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x00000010: 0x1044 instead
This breaks the filesystem and can lead to KASAN crashes such as:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88802c31e914 by task repro/830 CPU: 0 PID: 830 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120 print_report+0xc4/0x620 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x308/0x5b0 kasan_report+0xc1/0xf0 ? jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0 ? jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0 jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0 jffs2_flash_direct_writev+0xa8/0xd0 jffs2_flash_writev+0x9c9/0xef0 ? __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc4/0x160 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x140 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [...]
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2024-38599)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix reference count leak issues of ax25_dev
The ax25_addr_ax25dev() and ax25_dev_device_down() exist a reference count leak issue of the object "ax25_dev".
Memory leak issue in ax25_addr_ax25dev():
The reference count of the object "ax25_dev" can be increased multiple times in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). This will cause a memory leak.
Memory leak issues in ax25_dev_device_down():
The reference count of ax25_dev is set to 1 in ax25_dev_device_up() and then increase the reference count when ax25_dev is added to ax25_dev_list. As a result, the reference count of ax25_dev is 2. But when the device is shutting down. The ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count once or twice depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause memory leak.
As for the issue of ax25_addr_ax25dev(), it is impossible for one pointer to be on a list twice. So add a break in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). As for the issue of ax25_dev_device_down(), increase the reference count of ax25_dev once in ax25_dev_device_up() and decrease the reference count of ax25_dev after it is removed from the ax25_dev_list.(CVE-2024-38602)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: refine the EOF check in blkdev_iomap_begin
blkdev_iomap_begin rounds down the offset to the logical block size before stashing it in iomap->offset and checking that it still is inside the inode size.
Check the i_size check to the raw pos value so that we don't try a zero size write if iter->pos is unaligned.(CVE-2024-38604)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()
Patch series "mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes".
Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver. It compiles, that's all I know. I'll appreciate some review and testing from acrn folks.
Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding more sanity checks, and improving the documentation. Gave it a quick test on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte().
This patch (of 3):
We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.
(1) We're not checking PTE write permissions.
Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let's check for ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.
(2) We're not rejecting refcounted pages.
As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let's make sure to reject them.
(3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.
We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap->len may span a larger area. Let's loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn't have worked either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn't be accessing.(CVE-2024-38610)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dpu: Add callback function pointer check before its call
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to NULL, but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer. Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/588237/(CVE-2024-38622)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Use variable length array instead of fixed size
Should fix smatch warning: ntfs_set_label() error: __builtin_memcpy() 'uni->name' too small (20 vs 256)(CVE-2024-38623)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Use 64 bit variable to avoid 32 bit overflow
For example, in the expression: vbo = 2 * vbo + skip(CVE-2024-38624)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Check 'folio' pointer for NULL
It can be NULL if bmap is called.(CVE-2024-38625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: u_audio: Fix race condition use of controls after free during gadget unbind.
Hang on to the control IDs instead of pointers since those are correctly handled with locks.(CVE-2024-38628)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: Avoid unnecessary destruction of file_ida
file_ida is allocated during cdev open and is freed accordingly during cdev release. This sequence is guaranteed by driver file operations. Therefore, there is no need to destroy an already empty file_ida when the WQ cdev is removed.
Worse, ida_free() in cdev release may happen after destruction of file_ida per WQ cdev. This can lead to accessing an id in file_ida after it has been destroyed, resulting in a kernel panic.
Remove ida_destroy(&file_ida) to address these issues.(CVE-2024-38629)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
watchdog: cpu5wdt.c: Fix use-after-free bug caused by cpu5wdt_trigger
When the cpu5wdt module is removing, the origin code uses del_timer() to de-activate the timer. If the timer handler is running, del_timer() could not stop it and will return directly. If the port region is released by release_region() and then the timer handler cpu5wdt_trigger() calls outb() to write into the region that is released, the use-after-free bug will happen.
Change del_timer() to timer_shutdown_sync() in order that the timer handler could be finished before the port region is released.(CVE-2024-38630)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Lock port->lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()
uart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken, Since we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at the time of running. Make sure that it's taken by explicitly doing that. Without it we got a splat:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100] RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0 ... max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100] max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 max3100
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode
If channel for the given node is not found we return null from get_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer before using it in two of the missing places.
This was originally reported in [0]: Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Allow delete from sockmap/sockhash only if update is allowed
We have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to a tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete on a sockmap/sockhash.
We don't intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the existing verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash to also cover deleting from a map.
From now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update sockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types.(CVE-2024-38662)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm: zynqmp_dpsub: Always register bridge
We must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func calls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be initialized. We do this before zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init since that calls drm_bridge_attach. This fixes the following lockdep warning:
[ 19.217084] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 19.227530] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) [ 19.227768] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 140 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:582 __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550 [ 19.241696] Modules linked in: [ 19.244937] CPU: 0 PID: 140 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 6.6.20+ #96 [ 19.252046] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 19.256421] Workqueue: events zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func [ 19.261795] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 19.269104] pc : __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550 [ 19.273364] lr : __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550 [ 19.277592] sp : ffffffc085c5bbe0 [ 19.281066] x29: ffffffc085c5bbe0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff88009417f8 [ 19.288624] x26: ffffff8800941788 x25: ffffff8800020008 x24: ffffffc082aa3000 [ 19.296227] x23: ffffffc080d90e3c x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000 [ 19.303744] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff88002f5210 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 19.311295] x17: 6c707369642e3030 x16: 3030613464662072 x15: 0720072007200720 [ 19.318922] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 284e4f5f4e524157 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 19.326442] x11: 0001ffc085c5b940 x10: 0001ff88003f388b x9 : 0001ff88003f3888 [ 19.334003] x8 : 0001ff88003f3888 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 19.341537] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000001668 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 19.349054] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff88003f3880 [ 19.356581] Call trace: [ 19.359160] __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550 [ 19.363032] mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30 [ 19.367187] drm_bridge_hpd_notify+0x2c/0x6c [ 19.371698] zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func+0x44/0x54 [ 19.376364] process_one_work+0x3ac/0x988 [ 19.380660] worker_thread+0x398/0x694 [ 19.384736] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c0 [ 19.388241] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 19.392031] irq event stamp: 183 [ 19.395450] hardirqs last enabled at (183): [<ffffffc0800b9278>] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xa8/0x2d4 [ 19.405140] hardirqs last disabled at (182): [<ffffffc081ad3754>] __schedule+0x714/0xd04 [ 19.413612] softirqs last enabled at (114): [<ffffffc080133de8>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x158/0x23c [ 19.423128] softirqs last disabled at (110): [<ffffffc080133de8>] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x158/0x23c [ 19.432614] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
(cherry picked from commit 61ba791c4a7a09a370c45b70a81b8c7d4cf6b2ae)(CVE-2024-38664)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-buf/sw-sync: don't enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()
Since commit a6aa8fca4d79 ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from known context") by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with spin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite sync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains inconsistent lock state warning.
Use plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for sync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix oops during rmmod
"rmmod bonding" causes an oops ever since commit cc317ea3d927 ("bonding: remove redundant NULL check in debugfs function"). Here are the relevant functions being called:
bonding_exit() bond_destroy_debugfs() debugfs_remove_recursive(bonding_debug_root); bonding_debug_root = NULL; <--------- SET TO NULL HERE bond_netlink_fini() rtnl_link_unregister() __rtnl_link_unregister() unregister_netdevice_many_notify() bond_uninit() bond_debug_unregister() (commit removed check for bonding_debug_root == NULL) debugfs_remove() simple_recursive_removal() down_write() -> OOPS
However, reverting the bad commit does not solve the problem completely because the original code contains a race that could cause the same oops, although it was much less likely to be triggered unintentionally:
CPU1 rmmod bonding bonding_exit() bond_destroy_debugfs() debugfs_remove_recursive(bonding_debug_root);
CPU2 echo -bond0 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters bond_uninit() bond_debug_unregister() if (!bonding_debug_root)
CPU1 bonding_debug_root = NULL;
So do NOT revert the bad commit (since the removed checks were racy anyway), and instead change the order of actions taken during module removal. The same oops can also happen if there is an error during module init, so apply the same fix there.(CVE-2024-39296)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()
Syzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline] new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391 slaballoc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525 slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852 p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline] p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641 p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
If p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req->rc.tag will not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res() ends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc() finishes.
Fix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields such as 'tag' and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) 'id' during the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-39362)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: check for non-NULL file pointer in io_file_can_poll()
In earlier kernels, it was possible to trigger a NULL pointer dereference off the forced async preparation path, if no file had been assigned. The trace leading to that looks as follows:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000b0 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 67 PID: 1633 Comm: buf-ring-invali Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 RIP: 0010:io_buffer_select+0xc3/0x210 Code: 00 00 48 39 d1 0f 82 ae 00 00 00 48 81 4b 48 00 00 01 00 48 89 73 70 0f b7 50 0c 66 89 53 42 85 ed 0f 85 d2 00 00 00 48 8b 13 <48> 8b 92 b0 00 00 00 48 83 7a 40 00 0f 84 21 01 00 00 4c 8b 20 5b RSP: 0018:ffffb7bec38c7d88 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff97af2be61000 RBX: ffff97af234f1700 RCX: 0000000000000040 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff97aecfb04820 RDI: ffff97af234f1700 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000200030 R09: 0000000000000020 R10: ffffb7bec38c7dc8 R11: 000000000000c000 R12: ffffb7bec38c7db8 R13: ffff97aecfb05800 R14: ffff97aecfb05800 R15: ffff97af2be5e000 FS: 00007f852f74b740(0000) GS:ffff97b1eeec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000b0 CR3: 000000016deab005 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x1f/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x14d/0x420 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x61/0x6a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x6c/0x150 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? io_buffer_select+0xc3/0x210 __io_import_iovec+0xb5/0x120 io_readv_prep_async+0x36/0x70 io_queue_sqe_fallback+0x20/0x260 io_submit_sqes+0x314/0x630 __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x339/0xbc0 ? __do_sys_io_uring_register+0x11b/0xc50 ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0xce/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e RIP: 0033:0x55e0a110a67e Code: ba cc 00 00 00 45 31 c0 44 0f b6 92 d0 00 00 00 31 d2 41 b9 08 00 00 00 41 83 e2 01 41 c1 e2 04 41 09 c2 b8 aa 01 00 00 0f 05 <c3> 90 89 30 eb a9 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 42 20 8b 00 a8 06 75 af 85 f6
because the request is marked forced ASYNC and has a bad file fd, and hence takes the forced async prep path.
Current kernels with the request async prep cleaned up can no longer hit this issue, but for ease of backporting, let's add this safety check in here too as it really doesn't hurt. For both cases, this will inevitably end with a CQE posted with -EBADF.(CVE-2024-39371)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: bcm: rpi: Assign ->num before accessing ->hws
Commit f316cdff8d67 ("clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with __counted_by") annotated the hws member of 'struct clk_hw_onecell_data' with __counted_by, which informs the bounds sanitizer about the number of elements in hws, so that it can warn when hws is accessed out of bounds. As noted in that change, the __counted_by member must be initialized with the number of elements before the first array access happens, otherwise there will be a warning from each access prior to the initialization because the number of elements is zero. This occurs in raspberrypi_discover_clocks() due to ->num being assigned after ->hws has been accessed:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c:374:4 index 3 is out of range for type 'struct clk_hw [] __counted_by(num)' (aka 'struct clk_hw []')
Move the ->num initialization to before the first access of ->hws, which clears up the warning.(CVE-2024-39461)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
thermal/drivers/qcom/lmh: Check for SCM availability at probe
Up until now, the necessary scm availability check has not been performed, leading to possible null pointer dereferences (which did happen for me on RB1).
Fix that.(CVE-2024-39466)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid in sanity_check_inode()
syzbot reports a kernel bug as below:
F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 48b305e4
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88807a58c76c by task syz-executor280/5076
CPU: 1 PID: 5076 Comm: syz-executor280 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline] current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline] f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600 f2fs_xattr_fiemap fs/f2fs/data.c:1848 [inline] f2fs_fiemap+0x55d/0x1ee0 fs/f2fs/data.c:1925 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1c07/0x2e50 fs/ioctl.c:838 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:902 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x81/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
The root cause is we missed to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid during f2fs_iget(), so that in fiemap() path, current_nat_addr() will access nat_bitmap w/ offset from invalid i_xattr_nid, result in triggering kasan bug report, fix it.(CVE-2024-39467)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix deadlock in smb2_find_smb_tcon()
Unlock cifs_tcp_ses_lock before calling cifs_put_smb_ses() to avoid such deadlock.(CVE-2024-39468)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
eventfs: Fix a possible null pointer dereference in eventfs_find_events()
In function eventfs_find_events,there is a potential null pointer that may be caused by calling update_events_attr which will perform some operations on the members of the ei struct when ei is NULL.
Hence,When ei->is_freed is set,return NULL directly.(CVE-2024-39470)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-33.0.0.40.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def\r\n\r\nThe driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414\n[ 29.612820] Call Trace:\n[ 29.613030] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f\n[ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7\n[ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190\n[ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0\n[ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60\n[ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310\n[ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngenirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline\r\n\r\nThe absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of\ninterrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is\ndeferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the\noriginal CPU.\r\n\r\nWhen the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is\nenforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,\nbut the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately\nreclaimed. Instead, apicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming\nprocess is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nUpon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU,\nirq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU\u0026apos;s vector_cleanup list if it\nremains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its\nvector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.\r\n\r\nHowever, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the\ninterrupt triggers again on the new CPU.\r\n\r\nIn that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU\nto reclaim the old apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector because the interrupt isn\u0026apos;t currently\naffine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even\nthough __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it\ndoesn\u0026apos;t reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress and apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector to 0.\r\n\r\nAs a result, the vector remains unreclaimed in vector_matrix, leading to a\nCPU vector leak.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, move the invocation of irq_force_complete_move()\nbefore the irq_needs_fixup() call to reclaim apicd-\u0026gt;prev_vector, if the\ninterrupt is currently or used to be affine to the outgoing CPU.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, reclaim the vector in __vector_schedule_cleanup() as well,\nfollowing a warning message, although theoretically it should never see\napicd-\u0026gt;move_in_progress with apicd-\u0026gt;prev_cpu pointing to an offline CPU.(CVE-2024-31076)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntls: fix missing memory barrier in tls_init\r\n\r\nIn tls_init(), a write memory barrier is missing, and store-store\nreordering may cause NULL dereference in tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}.\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\n----- -----\n// In tls_init()\n// In tls_ctx_create()\nctx = kzalloc()\nctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto = READ_ONCE(sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot) -(1)\r\n\r\n// In update_sk_prot()\nWRITE_ONCE(sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot, tls_prots) -(2)\r\n\r\n // In sock_common_setsockopt()\n READ_ONCE(sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot)-\u0026gt;setsockopt()\r\n\r\n // In tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}()\n ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto-\u0026gt;setsockopt() -(3)\r\n\r\nIn the above scenario, when (1) and (2) are reordered, (3) can observe\nthe NULL value of ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto, causing NULL dereference.\r\n\r\nTo fix it, we rely on rcu_assign_pointer() which implies the release\nbarrier semantic. By moving rcu_assign_pointer() after ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto is\ninitialized, we can ensure that ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto are visible when\nchanging sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot.(CVE-2024-36489)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\namd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted\r\n\r\nIf there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first\ndevice will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes\non all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will\nstart reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been\nevicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page\nfault.(CVE-2024-36949)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Move NPIV\u0026apos;s transport unregistration to after resource clean up\r\n\r\nThere are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes\nthe NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is\nunregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the\nfabric.\r\n\r\nCurrently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including\nthe fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport\nobject. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and\nLOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.\r\n\r\nFix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID\nand LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ks8851: Queue RX packets in IRQ handler instead of disabling BHs\r\n\r\nCurrently the driver uses local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() in its\nIRQ handler to avoid triggering net_rx_action() softirq on exit from\nnetif_rx(). The net_rx_action() could trigger this driver .start_xmit\ncallback, which is protected by the same lock as the IRQ handler, so\ncalling the .start_xmit from netif_rx() from the IRQ handler critical\nsection protected by the lock could lead to an attempt to claim the\nalready claimed lock, and a hang.\r\n\r\nThe local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() approach works only in case\nthe IRQ handler is protected by a spinlock, but does not work if the\nIRQ handler is protected by mutex, i.e. this works for KS8851 with\nParallel bus interface, but not for KS8851 with SPI bus interface.\r\n\r\nRemove the BH manipulation and instead of calling netif_rx() inside\nthe IRQ handler code protected by the lock, queue all the received\nSKBs in the IRQ handler into a queue first, and once the IRQ handler\nexits the critical section protected by the lock, dequeue all the\nqueued SKBs and push them all into netif_rx(). At this point, it is\nsafe to trigger the net_rx_action() softirq, since the netif_rx()\ncall is outside of the lock that protects the IRQ handler.(CVE-2024-36962)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nremoteproc: mediatek: Make sure IPI buffer fits in L2TCM\r\n\r\nThe IPI buffer location is read from the firmware that we load to the\nSystem Companion Processor, and it\u0026apos;s not granted that both the SRAM\n(L2TCM) size that is defined in the devicetree node is large enough\nfor that, and while this is especially true for multi-core SCP, it\u0026apos;s\nstill useful to check on single-core variants as well.\r\n\r\nFailing to perform this check may make this driver perform R/W\noperations out of the L2TCM boundary, resulting (at best) in a\nkernel panic.\r\n\r\nTo fix that, check that the IPI buffer fits, otherwise return a\nfailure and refuse to boot the relevant SCP core (or the SCP at\nall, if this is single core).(CVE-2024-36965)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvirtio: delete vq in vp_find_vqs_msix() when request_irq() fails\r\n\r\nWhen request_irq() fails, error path calls vp_del_vqs(). There, as vq is\npresent in the list, free_irq() is called for the same vector. That\ncauses following splat:\r\n\r\n[ 0.414355] Trying to free already-free IRQ 27\n[ 0.414403] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1899 free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414510] Modules linked in:\n[ 0.414540] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #27\n[ 0.414540] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014\n[ 0.414540] RIP: 0010:free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] Code: 1e 00 48 83 c4 08 48 89 e8 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 90 8b 74 24 04 48 c7 c7 98 80 6c b1 e8 00 c9 f7 ff 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 48 89 ee 4c 89 ef e8 e0 20 b8 00 49 8b 47 40 48 8b 40\n[ 0.414540] RSP: 0000:ffffb71480013ae0 EFLAGS: 00010086\n[ 0.414540] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa099c2722000 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[ 0.414540] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffb71480013998 RDI: 0000000000000001\n[ 0.414540] RBP: 0000000000000246 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: 0000000000000001\n[ 0.414540] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffffb18729c0 R12: ffffa099c1c91760\n[ 0.414540] R13: ffffa099c1c916a4 R14: ffffa099c1d2f200 R15: ffffa099c1c91600\n[ 0.414540] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa099fec40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 0.414540] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 0.414540] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000008e3e001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0\n[ 0.414540] Call Trace:\n[ 0.414540] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 0.414540] ? __warn+0x80/0x120\n[ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190\n[ 0.414540] ? handle_bug+0x3b/0x70\n[ 0.414540] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70\n[ 0.414540] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] vp_del_vqs+0xc1/0x220\n[ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs_msix+0x305/0x470\n[ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs+0x3e/0x1a0\n[ 0.414540] vp_modern_find_vqs+0x1b/0x70\n[ 0.414540] init_vqs+0x387/0x600\n[ 0.414540] virtnet_probe+0x50a/0xc80\n[ 0.414540] virtio_dev_probe+0x1e0/0x2b0\n[ 0.414540] really_probe+0xc0/0x2c0\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x120\n[ 0.414540] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xe0\n[ 0.414540] __driver_attach+0x88/0x180\n[ 0.414540] bus_for_each_dev+0x85/0xd0\n[ 0.414540] bus_add_driver+0xec/0x1f0\n[ 0.414540] driver_register+0x59/0x100\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx_virtio_net_driver_init+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] virtio_net_driver_init+0x90/0xb0\n[ 0.414540] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x230\n[ 0.414540] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] kernel_init+0x1a/0x1c0\n[ 0.414540] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n[ 0.414540] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nFix this by calling deleting the current vq when request_irq() fails.(CVE-2024-37353)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: fix crash on racing fsync and size-extending write into prealloc\r\n\r\nWe have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in\nbtrfs_set_item_key_safe():\r\n\r\n BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192)\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620!\n invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]\r\n\r\nWith the following stack trace:\r\n\r\n #0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4)\n #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4)\n #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9)\n #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9)\n #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9)\n #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8)\n #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8)\n #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8)\n #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9)\n #9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9)\n #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9)\n #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9)\n #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)\n #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)\n #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14)\n #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7)\n #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)\r\n\r\nSo we\u0026apos;re logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an\nextent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree,\ntriggering the BUG().\r\n\r\nThis is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with\ndrgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py)\nto get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:\r\n\r\n \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0026quot;eb\u0026quot;])\n leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610\n leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000\n fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677\n chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da\n item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160\n generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198\n block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0\n sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)\n atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)\n ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)\n mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)\n otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16)\n item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13\n index 195 namelen 3 name: 193\n item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37\n location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR\n transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6\n name: user.a\n data a\n item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53\n generation 9 type 1 (regular)\n extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288\n extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288\n extent compression 0 (none)\n item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53\n generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)\n prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288\n prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192\n item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53\n generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)\n prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288\n prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096\n ...\r\n\r\nSo the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5\n(8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and\nitem 5 starts at i_size.\r\n\r\nHere is the state of \n---truncated---(CVE-2024-37354)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: Fix shift-out-of-bounds in dctcp_update_alpha().\r\n\r\nIn dctcp_update_alpha(), we use a module parameter dctcp_shift_g\nas follows:\r\n\r\n alpha -= min_not_zero(alpha, alpha \u0026gt;\u0026gt; dctcp_shift_g);\n ...\n delivered_ce \u0026lt;\u0026lt;= (10 - dctcp_shift_g);\r\n\r\nIt seems syzkaller started fuzzing module parameters and triggered\nshift-out-of-bounds [0] by setting 100 to dctcp_shift_g:\r\n\r\n memcpy((void*)0x20000080,\n \u0026quot;/sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\\000\u0026quot;, 47);\n res = syscall(__NR_openat, /*fd=*/0xffffffffffffff9cul, /*file=*/0x20000080ul,\n /*flags=*/2ul, /*mode=*/0ul);\n memcpy((void*)0x20000000, \u0026quot;100\\000\u0026quot;, 4);\n syscall(__NR_write, /*fd=*/r[0], /*val=*/0x20000000ul, /*len=*/4ul);\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s limit the max value of dctcp_shift_g by param_set_uint_minmax().\r\n\r\nWith this patch:\r\n\r\n # echo 10 \u0026gt; /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n # cat /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n 10\n # echo 11 \u0026gt; /sys/module/tcp_dctcp/parameters/dctcp_shift_g\n -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument\r\n\r\n[0]:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143:12\nshift exponent 100 is too large for 32-bit type \u0026apos;u32\u0026apos; (aka \u0026apos;unsigned int\u0026apos;)\nCPU: 0 PID: 8083 Comm: syz-executor345 Not tainted 6.9.0-05151-g1b294a1f3561 #2\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline]\n __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x346/0x3a0 lib/ubsan.c:468\n dctcp_update_alpha+0x540/0x570 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c:143\n tcp_in_ack_event net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3802 [inline]\n tcp_ack+0x17b1/0x3bc0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3948\n tcp_rcv_state_process+0x57a/0x2290 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6711\n tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x764/0xc40 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1937\n sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1106 [inline]\n __release_sock+0x20f/0x350 net/core/sock.c:2983\n release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3549\n mptcp_subflow_shutdown+0x3d0/0x620 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2907\n mptcp_check_send_data_fin+0x225/0x410 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2976\n __mptcp_close+0x238/0xad0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3072\n mptcp_close+0x2a/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3127\n inet_release+0x190/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:437\n __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]\n sock_close+0xc0/0x240 net/socket.c:1421\n __fput+0x41b/0x890 fs/file_table.c:422\n task_work_run+0x23b/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:180\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]\n do_exit+0x9c8/0x2540 kernel/exit.c:878\n do_group_exit+0x201/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:1027\n __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1038 [inline]\n __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1036 [inline]\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1036\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xe4/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f6c2b5005b6\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f6c2b50058c.\nRSP: 002b:00007ffe883eb948 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6c2b5862f0 RCX: 00007f6c2b5005b6\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000003c RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000000000e7 R09: ffffffffffffffc0\nR10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6c2b5862f0\nR13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-37356)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: mediatek: Assign dummy when codec not specified for a DAI link\r\n\r\nMediaTek sound card drivers are checking whether a DAI link is present\nand used on a board to assign the correct parameters and this is done\nby checking the codec DAI names at probe time.\r\n\r\nIf no real codec is present, assign the dummy codec to the DAI link\nto avoid NULL pointer during string comparison.(CVE-2024-38551)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\r\n\r\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\r\n\r\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\r\n\r\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-38552)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device\r\n\r\nThere is a reference count leak issue of the object \u0026quot;net_device\u0026quot; in\nax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the\nax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one\nor zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will\ncause memory leak.\r\n\r\nIn order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of\nnet_device after dev-\u0026gt;ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5: Discard command completions in internal error\r\n\r\nFix use after free when FW completion arrives while device is in\ninternal error state. Avoid calling completion handler in this case,\nsince the device will flush the command interface and trigger all\ncompletions manually.\r\n\r\nKernel log:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nrefcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n...\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\n...\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n? __warn+0x79/0x120\n? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\n? report_bug+0x17c/0x190\n? handle_bug+0x3c/0x60\n? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70\n? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n? refcount_warn_saturate+0xd8/0xe0\ncmd_ent_put+0x13b/0x160 [mlx5_core]\nmlx5_cmd_comp_handler+0x5f9/0x670 [mlx5_core]\ncmd_comp_notifier+0x1f/0x30 [mlx5_core]\nnotifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\natomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20\nmlx5_eq_async_int+0xf6/0x290 [mlx5_core]\nnotifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\natomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20\nirq_int_handler+0x19/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x4b/0x160\nhandle_irq_event+0x2e/0x80\nhandle_edge_irq+0x98/0x230\n__common_interrupt+0x3b/0xa0\ncommon_interrupt+0x7b/0xa0\n\u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\nasm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40(CVE-2024-38555)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: nl80211: Avoid address calculations via out of bounds array indexing\r\n\r\nBefore request-\u0026gt;channels[] can be used, request-\u0026gt;n_channels must be set.\nAdditionally, address calculations for memory after the \u0026quot;channels\u0026quot; array\nneed to be calculated from the allocation base (\u0026quot;request\u0026quot;) rather than\nvia the first \u0026quot;out of bounds\u0026quot; index of \u0026quot;channels\u0026quot;, otherwise run-time\nbounds checking will throw a warning.(CVE-2024-38562)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Add BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB attach type enforcement in BPF_LINK_CREATE\r\n\r\nbpf_prog_attach uses attach_type_to_prog_type to enforce proper\nattach type for BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB. link_create uses\nbpf_prog_get and relies on bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type\nto properly verify prog_type \u0026lt;\u0026gt; attach_type association.\r\n\r\nAdd missing attach_type enforcement for the link_create case.\nOtherwise, it\u0026apos;s currently possible to attach cgroup_skb prog\ntypes to other cgroup hooks.(CVE-2024-38564)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrcu-tasks: Fix show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread buffer overflow\r\n\r\nThere is a possibility of buffer overflow in\nshow_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed\nto sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this\nare unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still\npossible.\r\n\r\nUse snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38577)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic\r\n\r\nIn spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len\ninstead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the\nbuffer boundaries.\nFix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()\r\n\r\nSyzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called\nduring nilfs2 unmount.\r\n\r\nAnalysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which\nsynchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after\nnilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace\nbelow:\r\n\r\nnilfs_detach_log_writer\n nilfs_segctor_destroy\n nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --\u0026gt; Shut down log writer thread\n flush_work\n nilfs_iput_work_func\n nilfs_dispose_list\n iput\n nilfs_evict_inode\n nilfs_transaction_commit\n nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync)\n nilfs_segctor_sync --\u0026gt; Attempt to synchronize with\n log writer thread\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\nFix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer\nthread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by\nforcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread\nterminates.\r\n\r\nThe skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the\nsubsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()\r\n\r\nKASAN reports a bug:\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424\n CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+\n [...]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0\n print_report+0xcf/0x610\n kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0\n ftrace_location+0x90/0x120\n register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40\n kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example]\n do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0\n do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0\n load_module+0x3082/0x33d0\n init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130\n __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440\n do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79\r\n\r\nThe root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address\nis being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages\nat the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the\ncorresponding module is being deleted:\r\n\r\n CPU1 | CPU2\n register_kprobes() { | delete_module() {\n check_kprobe_address_safe() { |\n arch_check_ftrace_location() { |\n ftrace_location() { |\n lookup_rec() // USE! | ftrace_release_mod() // Free!\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue:\n 1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range();\n 2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in\n ftrace_location();\n 3. Call synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages both in\n ftrace_process_locs()/ftrace_release_mod()/ftrace_free_mem().(CVE-2024-38588)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd: fix resync softlockup when bitmap size is less than array size\r\n\r\nIs is reported that for dm-raid10, lvextend + lvchange --syncaction will\ntrigger following softlockup:\r\n\r\nkernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 26s! [mdX_resync:6976]\nCPU: 7 PID: 3588 Comm: mdX_resync Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-next-20240419 #1\nRIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x13/0x30\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n md_bitmap_start_sync+0x6b/0xf0\n raid10_sync_request+0x25c/0x1b40 [raid10]\n md_do_sync+0x64b/0x1020\n md_thread+0xa7/0x170\n kthread+0xcf/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\r\n\r\nAnd the detailed process is as follows:\r\n\r\nmd_do_sync\n j = mddev-\u0026gt;resync_min\n while (j \u0026lt; max_sectors)\n sectors = raid10_sync_request(mddev, j, \u0026amp;skipped)\n if (!md_bitmap_start_sync(..., \u0026amp;sync_blocks))\n // md_bitmap_start_sync set sync_blocks to 0\n return sync_blocks + sectors_skippe;\n // sectors = 0;\n j += sectors;\n // j never change\r\n\r\nRoot cause is that commit 301867b1c168 (\u0026quot;md/raid10: check\nslab-out-of-bounds in md_bitmap_get_counter\u0026quot;) return early from\nmd_bitmap_get_counter(), without setting returned blocks.\r\n\r\nFix this problem by always set returned blocks from\nmd_bitmap_get_counter\u0026quot;(), as it used to be.\r\n\r\nNoted that this patch just fix the softlockup problem in kernel, the\ncase that bitmap size doesn\u0026apos;t match array size still need to be fixed.(CVE-2024-38598)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njffs2: prevent xattr node from overflowing the eraseblock\r\n\r\nAdd a check to make sure that the requested xattr node size is no larger\nthan the eraseblock minus the cleanmarker.\r\n\r\nUnlike the usual inode nodes, the xattr nodes aren\u0026apos;t split into parts\nand spread across multiple eraseblocks, which means that a xattr node\nmust not occupy more than one eraseblock. If the requested xattr value is\ntoo large, the xattr node can spill onto the next eraseblock, overwriting\nthe nodes and causing errors such as:\r\n\r\njffs2: argh. node added in wrong place at 0x0000b050(2)\njffs2: nextblock 0x0000a000, expected at 0000b00c\njffs2: error: (823) do_verify_xattr_datum: node CRC failed at 0x01e050,\nread=0xfc892c93, calc=0x000000\njffs2: notice: (823) jffs2_get_inode_nodes: Node header CRC failed\nat 0x01e00c. {848f,2fc4,0fef511f,59a3d171}\njffs2: Node at 0x0000000c with length 0x00001044 would run over the\nend of the erase block\njffs2: Perhaps the file system was created with the wrong erase size?\njffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found\nat 0x00000010: 0x1044 instead\r\n\r\nThis breaks the filesystem and can lead to KASAN crashes such as:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88802c31e914 by task repro/830\nCPU: 0 PID: 830 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3+ #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),\nBIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0xc6/0x120\n print_report+0xc4/0x620\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x308/0x5b0\n kasan_report+0xc1/0xf0\n ? jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0\n ? jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0\n jffs2_sum_add_kvec+0x125e/0x15d0\n jffs2_flash_direct_writev+0xa8/0xd0\n jffs2_flash_writev+0x9c9/0xef0\n ? __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc4/0x160\n ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x140\n ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n [...]\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2024-38599)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix reference count leak issues of ax25_dev\r\n\r\nThe ax25_addr_ax25dev() and ax25_dev_device_down() exist a reference\ncount leak issue of the object \u0026quot;ax25_dev\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nMemory leak issue in ax25_addr_ax25dev():\r\n\r\nThe reference count of the object \u0026quot;ax25_dev\u0026quot; can be increased multiple\ntimes in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). This will cause a memory leak.\r\n\r\nMemory leak issues in ax25_dev_device_down():\r\n\r\nThe reference count of ax25_dev is set to 1 in ax25_dev_device_up() and\nthen increase the reference count when ax25_dev is added to ax25_dev_list.\nAs a result, the reference count of ax25_dev is 2. But when the device is\nshutting down. The ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count once\nor twice depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause\nmemory leak.\r\n\r\nAs for the issue of ax25_addr_ax25dev(), it is impossible for one pointer\nto be on a list twice. So add a break in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). As for the\nissue of ax25_dev_device_down(), increase the reference count of ax25_dev\nonce in ax25_dev_device_up() and decrease the reference count of ax25_dev\nafter it is removed from the ax25_dev_list.(CVE-2024-38602)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: refine the EOF check in blkdev_iomap_begin\r\n\r\nblkdev_iomap_begin rounds down the offset to the logical block size\nbefore stashing it in iomap-\u0026gt;offset and checking that it still is\ninside the inode size.\r\n\r\nCheck the i_size check to the raw pos value so that we don\u0026apos;t try a\nzero size write if iter-\u0026gt;pos is unaligned.(CVE-2024-38604)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nPatch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver. It\ncompiles, that\u0026apos;s all I know. I\u0026apos;ll appreciate some review and testing from\nacrn folks.\r\n\r\nPatch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding\nmore sanity checks, and improving the documentation. Gave it a quick test\non x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte().\r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 3):\r\n\r\nWe currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous\nfollow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage.\r\n\r\n(1) We\u0026apos;re not checking PTE write permissions.\r\n\r\nMaybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for\npin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let\u0026apos;s check for\nACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now.\r\n\r\n(2) We\u0026apos;re not rejecting refcounted pages.\r\n\r\nAs we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is\ndangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let\u0026apos;s make sure to reject them.\r\n\r\n(3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range.\r\n\r\nWe only lookup a single PTE, but memmap-\u0026gt;len may span a larger area.\nLet\u0026apos;s loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is\nactually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn\u0026apos;t have worked\neither way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn\u0026apos;t be accessing.(CVE-2024-38610)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/msm/dpu: Add callback function pointer check before its call\r\n\r\nIn dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to NULL,\nbut then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.\nFix this bug by adding conditional return.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\nPatchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/588237/(CVE-2024-38622)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Use variable length array instead of fixed size\r\n\r\nShould fix smatch warning:\n\tntfs_set_label() error: __builtin_memcpy() \u0026apos;uni-\u0026gt;name\u0026apos; too small (20 vs 256)(CVE-2024-38623)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Use 64 bit variable to avoid 32 bit overflow\r\n\r\nFor example, in the expression:\n\tvbo = 2 * vbo + skip(CVE-2024-38624)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Check \u0026apos;folio\u0026apos; pointer for NULL\r\n\r\nIt can be NULL if bmap is called.(CVE-2024-38625)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: u_audio: Fix race condition use of controls after free during gadget unbind.\r\n\r\nHang on to the control IDs instead of pointers since those are correctly\nhandled with locks.(CVE-2024-38628)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: idxd: Avoid unnecessary destruction of file_ida\r\n\r\nfile_ida is allocated during cdev open and is freed accordingly\nduring cdev release. This sequence is guaranteed by driver file\noperations. Therefore, there is no need to destroy an already empty\nfile_ida when the WQ cdev is removed.\r\n\r\nWorse, ida_free() in cdev release may happen after destruction of\nfile_ida per WQ cdev. This can lead to accessing an id in file_ida\nafter it has been destroyed, resulting in a kernel panic.\r\n\r\nRemove ida_destroy(\u0026amp;file_ida) to address these issues.(CVE-2024-38629)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwatchdog: cpu5wdt.c: Fix use-after-free bug caused by cpu5wdt_trigger\r\n\r\nWhen the cpu5wdt module is removing, the origin code uses del_timer() to\nde-activate the timer. If the timer handler is running, del_timer() could\nnot stop it and will return directly. If the port region is released by\nrelease_region() and then the timer handler cpu5wdt_trigger() calls outb()\nto write into the region that is released, the use-after-free bug will\nhappen.\r\n\r\nChange del_timer() to timer_shutdown_sync() in order that the timer handler\ncould be finished before the port region is released.(CVE-2024-38630)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Lock port-\u0026gt;lock when calling uart_handle_cts_change()\r\n\r\nuart_handle_cts_change() has to be called with port lock taken,\nSince we run it in a separate work, the lock may not be taken at\nthe time of running. Make sure that it\u0026apos;s taken by explicitly doing\nthat. Without it we got a splat:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3491 uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n Workqueue: max3100-0 max3100_work [max3100]\n RIP: 0010:uart_handle_cts_change+0xa6/0xb0\n ...\n max3100_handlerx+0xc5/0x110 [max3100]\n max3100_work+0x12a/0x340 [max3100](CVE-2024-38634)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode\r\n\r\nIf channel for the given node is not found we return null from\nget_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer\nbefore using it in two of the missing places.\r\n\r\nThis was originally reported in [0]:\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Allow delete from sockmap/sockhash only if update is allowed\r\n\r\nWe have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to\na tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete\non a sockmap/sockhash.\r\n\r\nWe don\u0026apos;t intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the\nexisting verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash\nto also cover deleting from a map.\r\n\r\nFrom now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update\nsockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types.(CVE-2024-38662)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm: zynqmp_dpsub: Always register bridge\r\n\r\nWe must always register the DRM bridge, since zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func\ncalls drm_bridge_hpd_notify, which in turn expects hpd_mutex to be\ninitialized. We do this before zynqmp_dpsub_drm_init since that calls\ndrm_bridge_attach. This fixes the following lockdep warning:\r\n\r\n[ 19.217084] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 19.227530] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock-\u0026gt;magic != lock)\n[ 19.227768] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 140 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:582 __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550\n[ 19.241696] Modules linked in:\n[ 19.244937] CPU: 0 PID: 140 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 6.6.20+ #96\n[ 19.252046] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT)\n[ 19.256421] Workqueue: events zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func\n[ 19.261795] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 19.269104] pc : __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550\n[ 19.273364] lr : __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550\n[ 19.277592] sp : ffffffc085c5bbe0\n[ 19.281066] x29: ffffffc085c5bbe0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff88009417f8\n[ 19.288624] x26: ffffff8800941788 x25: ffffff8800020008 x24: ffffffc082aa3000\n[ 19.296227] x23: ffffffc080d90e3c x22: 0000000000000002 x21: 0000000000000000\n[ 19.303744] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff88002f5210 x18: 0000000000000000\n[ 19.311295] x17: 6c707369642e3030 x16: 3030613464662072 x15: 0720072007200720\n[ 19.318922] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 284e4f5f4e524157 x12: 0000000000000001\n[ 19.326442] x11: 0001ffc085c5b940 x10: 0001ff88003f388b x9 : 0001ff88003f3888\n[ 19.334003] x8 : 0001ff88003f3888 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000\n[ 19.341537] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000001668 x3 : 0000000000000000\n[ 19.349054] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff88003f3880\n[ 19.356581] Call trace:\n[ 19.359160] __mutex_lock+0x4bc/0x550\n[ 19.363032] mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30\n[ 19.367187] drm_bridge_hpd_notify+0x2c/0x6c\n[ 19.371698] zynqmp_dp_hpd_work_func+0x44/0x54\n[ 19.376364] process_one_work+0x3ac/0x988\n[ 19.380660] worker_thread+0x398/0x694\n[ 19.384736] kthread+0x1bc/0x1c0\n[ 19.388241] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n[ 19.392031] irq event stamp: 183\n[ 19.395450] hardirqs last enabled at (183): [\u0026lt;ffffffc0800b9278\u0026gt;] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xa8/0x2d4\n[ 19.405140] hardirqs last disabled at (182): [\u0026lt;ffffffc081ad3754\u0026gt;] __schedule+0x714/0xd04\n[ 19.413612] softirqs last enabled at (114): [\u0026lt;ffffffc080133de8\u0026gt;] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x158/0x23c\n[ 19.423128] softirqs last disabled at (110): [\u0026lt;ffffffc080133de8\u0026gt;] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x158/0x23c\n[ 19.432614] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 61ba791c4a7a09a370c45b70a81b8c7d4cf6b2ae)(CVE-2024-38664)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma-buf/sw-sync: don\u0026apos;t enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()\r\n\r\nSince commit a6aa8fca4d79 (\u0026quot;dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from\nknown context\u0026quot;) by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with\nspin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite\nsync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains\ninconsistent lock state warning.\r\n\r\nUse plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for\nsync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix oops during rmmod\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;rmmod bonding\u0026quot; causes an oops ever since commit cc317ea3d927 (\u0026quot;bonding:\nremove redundant NULL check in debugfs function\u0026quot;). Here are the relevant\nfunctions being called:\r\n\r\nbonding_exit()\n bond_destroy_debugfs()\n debugfs_remove_recursive(bonding_debug_root);\n bonding_debug_root = NULL; \u0026lt;--------- SET TO NULL HERE\n bond_netlink_fini()\n rtnl_link_unregister()\n __rtnl_link_unregister()\n unregister_netdevice_many_notify()\n bond_uninit()\n bond_debug_unregister()\n (commit removed check for bonding_debug_root == NULL)\n debugfs_remove()\n simple_recursive_removal()\n down_write() -\u0026gt; OOPS\r\n\r\nHowever, reverting the bad commit does not solve the problem completely\nbecause the original code contains a race that could cause the same\noops, although it was much less likely to be triggered unintentionally:\r\n\r\nCPU1\n rmmod bonding\n bonding_exit()\n bond_destroy_debugfs()\n debugfs_remove_recursive(bonding_debug_root);\r\n\r\nCPU2\n echo -bond0 \u0026gt; /sys/class/net/bonding_masters\n bond_uninit()\n bond_debug_unregister()\n if (!bonding_debug_root)\r\n\r\nCPU1\n bonding_debug_root = NULL;\r\n\r\nSo do NOT revert the bad commit (since the removed checks were racy\nanyway), and instead change the order of actions taken during module\nremoval. The same oops can also happen if there is an error during\nmodule init, so apply the same fix there.(CVE-2024-39296)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()\r\n\r\nSyzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\n p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598\n __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]\n alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline]\n allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline]\n new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391\n ___slab_alloc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525\n __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline]\n __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852\n p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline]\n p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641\n p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nIf p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req-\u0026gt;rc.tag\nwill not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res()\nends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc()\nfinishes.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields\nsuch as \u0026apos;tag\u0026apos; and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) \u0026apos;id\u0026apos;\nduring the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-39362)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring: check for non-NULL file pointer in io_file_can_poll()\r\n\r\nIn earlier kernels, it was possible to trigger a NULL pointer\ndereference off the forced async preparation path, if no file had\nbeen assigned. The trace leading to that looks as follows:\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000b0\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\nCPU: 67 PID: 1633 Comm: buf-ring-invali Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3+ #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS unknown 2/2/2022\nRIP: 0010:io_buffer_select+0xc3/0x210\nCode: 00 00 48 39 d1 0f 82 ae 00 00 00 48 81 4b 48 00 00 01 00 48 89 73 70 0f b7 50 0c 66 89 53 42 85 ed 0f 85 d2 00 00 00 48 8b 13 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8b 92 b0 00 00 00 48 83 7a 40 00 0f 84 21 01 00 00 4c 8b 20 5b\nRSP: 0018:ffffb7bec38c7d88 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: ffff97af2be61000 RBX: ffff97af234f1700 RCX: 0000000000000040\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff97aecfb04820 RDI: ffff97af234f1700\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000200030 R09: 0000000000000020\nR10: ffffb7bec38c7dc8 R11: 000000000000c000 R12: ffffb7bec38c7db8\nR13: ffff97aecfb05800 R14: ffff97aecfb05800 R15: ffff97af2be5e000\nFS: 00007f852f74b740(0000) GS:ffff97b1eeec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00000000000000b0 CR3: 000000016deab005 CR4: 0000000000370ef0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x1f/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x14d/0x420\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x61/0x6a0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x6c/0x150\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? io_buffer_select+0xc3/0x210\n __io_import_iovec+0xb5/0x120\n io_readv_prep_async+0x36/0x70\n io_queue_sqe_fallback+0x20/0x260\n io_submit_sqes+0x314/0x630\n __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x339/0xbc0\n ? __do_sys_io_uring_register+0x11b/0xc50\n ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0xce/0x160\n do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x180\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\nRIP: 0033:0x55e0a110a67e\nCode: ba cc 00 00 00 45 31 c0 44 0f b6 92 d0 00 00 00 31 d2 41 b9 08 00 00 00 41 83 e2 01 41 c1 e2 04 41 09 c2 b8 aa 01 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;c3\u0026gt; 90 89 30 eb a9 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 42 20 8b 00 a8 06 75 af 85 f6\r\n\r\nbecause the request is marked forced ASYNC and has a bad file fd, and\nhence takes the forced async prep path.\r\n\r\nCurrent kernels with the request async prep cleaned up can no longer hit\nthis issue, but for ease of backporting, let\u0026apos;s add this safety check in\nhere too as it really doesn\u0026apos;t hurt. For both cases, this will inevitably\nend with a CQE posted with -EBADF.(CVE-2024-39371)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: bcm: rpi: Assign -\u0026gt;num before accessing -\u0026gt;hws\r\n\r\nCommit f316cdff8d67 (\u0026quot;clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with\n__counted_by\u0026quot;) annotated the hws member of \u0026apos;struct clk_hw_onecell_data\u0026apos;\nwith __counted_by, which informs the bounds sanitizer about the number\nof elements in hws, so that it can warn when hws is accessed out of\nbounds. As noted in that change, the __counted_by member must be\ninitialized with the number of elements before the first array access\nhappens, otherwise there will be a warning from each access prior to the\ninitialization because the number of elements is zero. This occurs in\nraspberrypi_discover_clocks() due to -\u0026gt;num being assigned after -\u0026gt;hws\nhas been accessed:\r\n\r\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c:374:4\n index 3 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct clk_hw *[] __counted_by(num)\u0026apos; (aka \u0026apos;struct clk_hw *[]\u0026apos;)\r\n\r\nMove the -\u0026gt;num initialization to before the first access of -\u0026gt;hws, which\nclears up the warning.(CVE-2024-39461)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nthermal/drivers/qcom/lmh: Check for SCM availability at probe\r\n\r\nUp until now, the necessary scm availability check has not been\nperformed, leading to possible null pointer dereferences (which did\nhappen for me on RB1).\r\n\r\nFix that.(CVE-2024-39466)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid in sanity_check_inode()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports a kernel bug as below:\r\n\r\nF2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 48b305e4\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600\nRead of size 1 at addr ffff88807a58c76c by task syz-executor280/5076\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5076 Comm: syz-executor280 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline]\n current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline]\n f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600\n f2fs_xattr_fiemap fs/f2fs/data.c:1848 [inline]\n f2fs_fiemap+0x55d/0x1ee0 fs/f2fs/data.c:1925\n ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline]\n do_vfs_ioctl+0x1c07/0x2e50 fs/ioctl.c:838\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:902 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x81/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nThe root cause is we missed to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid during\nf2fs_iget(), so that in fiemap() path, current_nat_addr() will access\nnat_bitmap w/ offset from invalid i_xattr_nid, result in triggering\nkasan bug report, fix it.(CVE-2024-39467)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsmb: client: fix deadlock in smb2_find_smb_tcon()\r\n\r\nUnlock cifs_tcp_ses_lock before calling cifs_put_smb_ses() to avoid such\ndeadlock.(CVE-2024-39468)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\neventfs: Fix a possible null pointer dereference in eventfs_find_events()\r\n\r\nIn function eventfs_find_events,there is a potential null pointer\nthat may be caused by calling update_events_attr which will perform\nsome operations on the members of the ei struct when ei is NULL.\r\n\r\nHence,When ei-\u0026gt;is_freed is set,return NULL directly.(CVE-2024-39470)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1836",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:18Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T11:07:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36965"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38551"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38562"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38577"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38599"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38610"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38622"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38623"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38624"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38630"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38662"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38664"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39296"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39371"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39461"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39466"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39467"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39470"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-48772",
"CVE-2024-31076",
"CVE-2024-36489",
"CVE-2024-36949",
"CVE-2024-36952",
"CVE-2024-36962",
"CVE-2024-36965",
"CVE-2024-37353",
"CVE-2024-37354",
"CVE-2024-37356",
"CVE-2024-38551",
"CVE-2024-38552",
"CVE-2024-38554",
"CVE-2024-38555",
"CVE-2024-38562",
"CVE-2024-38564",
"CVE-2024-38577",
"CVE-2024-38579",
"CVE-2024-38582",
"CVE-2024-38588",
"CVE-2024-38598",
"CVE-2024-38599",
"CVE-2024-38602",
"CVE-2024-38604",
"CVE-2024-38610",
"CVE-2024-38622",
"CVE-2024-38623",
"CVE-2024-38624",
"CVE-2024-38625",
"CVE-2024-38628",
"CVE-2024-38629",
"CVE-2024-38630",
"CVE-2024-38634",
"CVE-2024-38637",
"CVE-2024-38662",
"CVE-2024-38664",
"CVE-2024-38780",
"CVE-2024-39296",
"CVE-2024-39301",
"CVE-2024-39362",
"CVE-2024-39371",
"CVE-2024-39461",
"CVE-2024-39466",
"CVE-2024-39467",
"CVE-2024-39468",
"CVE-2024-39470"
]
}
OESA-2024-1838 (CVE-2021-47618)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-07-12 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ARM: 9170/1: fix panic when kasan and kprobe are enabled
arm32 uses software to simulate the instruction replaced by kprobe. some instructions may be simulated by constructing assembly functions. therefore, before executing instruction simulation, it is necessary to construct assembly function execution environment in C language through binding registers. after kasan is enabled, the register binding relationship will be destroyed, resulting in instruction simulation errors and causing kernel panic.
the kprobe emulate instruction function is distributed in three files: actions-common.c actions-arm.c actions-thumb.c, so disable KASAN when compiling these files.
for example, use kprobe insert on cap_capable+20 after kasan enabled, the cap_capable assembly code is as follows: <cap_capable>: e92d47f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, lr} e1a05000 mov r5, r0 e280006c add r0, r0, #108 ; 0x6c e1a04001 mov r4, r1 e1a06002 mov r6, r2 e59fa090 ldr sl, [pc, #144] ; ebfc7bf8 bl c03aa4b4 <__asan_load4> e595706c ldr r7, [r5, #108] ; 0x6c e2859014 add r9, r5, #20 ...... The emulate_ldr assembly code after enabling kasan is as follows: c06f1384 <emulate_ldr>: e92d47f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, lr} e282803c add r8, r2, #60 ; 0x3c e1a05000 mov r5, r0 e7e37855 ubfx r7, r5, #16, #4 e1a00008 mov r0, r8 e1a09001 mov r9, r1 e1a04002 mov r4, r2 ebf35462 bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e357000f cmp r7, #15 e7e36655 ubfx r6, r5, #12, #4 e205a00f and sl, r5, #15 0a000001 beq c06f13bc <emulate_ldr+0x38> e0840107 add r0, r4, r7, lsl #2 ebf3545c bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e084010a add r0, r4, sl, lsl #2 ebf3545a bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e2890010 add r0, r9, #16 ebf35458 bl c03c6530 <__asan_load4> e5990010 ldr r0, [r9, #16] e12fff30 blx r0 e356000f cm r6, #15 1a000014 bne c06f1430 <emulate_ldr+0xac> e1a06000 mov r6, r0 e2840040 add r0, r4, #64 ; 0x40 ......
when running in emulate_ldr to simulate the ldr instruction, panic occurred, and the log is as follows: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000090 pgd = ecb46400 [00000090] pgd=2e0fa003, pmd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 206 [#1] SMP ARM PC is at cap_capable+0x14/0xb0 LR is at emulate_ldr+0x50/0xc0 psr: 600d0293 sp : ecd63af8 ip : 00000004 fp : c0a7c30c r10: 00000000 r9 : c30897f4 r8 : ecd63cd4 r7 : 0000000f r6 : 0000000a r5 : e59fa090 r4 : ecd63c98 r3 : c06ae294 r2 : 00000000 r1 : b7611300 r0 : bf4ec008 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user Control: 32c5387d Table: 2d546400 DAC: 55555555 Process bash (pid: 1643, stack limit = 0xecd60190) (cap_capable) from (kprobe_handler+0x218/0x340) (kprobe_handler) from (kprobe_trap_handler+0x24/0x48) (kprobe_trap_handler) from (do_undefinstr+0x13c/0x364) (do_undefinstr) from (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x30) (__und_svc_finish) from (cap_capable+0x18/0xb0) (cap_capable) from (cap_vm_enough_memory+0x38/0x48) (cap_vm_enough_memory) from (security_vm_enough_memory_mm+0x48/0x6c) (security_vm_enough_memory_mm) from (copy_process.constprop.5+0x16b4/0x25c8) (copy_process.constprop.5) from (_do_fork+0xe8/0x55c) (_do_fork) from (SyS_clone+0x1c/0x24) (SyS_clone) from (__sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10) Code: 0050a0e1 6c0080e2 0140a0e1 0260a0e1 (f801f0e7)(CVE-2021-47618)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots;
2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list;
3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction() we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can access it anymore.(CVE-2022-48733)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid intentionally writing across neighboring fields.
Use flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they are always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves that can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.
We were doing:
#define ETH_HLEN 14
#define VLAN_HLEN 4
...
#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)
...
struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);
...
struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = &wqe->eth;
struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe->data;
...
memcpy(eseg->inline_hdr.start, xdptxd->data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);
target is wqe->eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being 2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start (really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into wqe->data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr (8 bytes).
struct mlx5e_tx_wqe { struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; / 0 16 / struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; / 16 16 / struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; / 32 0 /
/* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
};
struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg { u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; / 0 1 / u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; / 1 1 / u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; / 2 1 / u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; / 3 1 / u8 cs_flags; / 4 1 / u8 swp_flags; / 5 1 / __be16 mss; / 6 2 / __be32 flow_table_metadata; / 8 4 / union { struct { __be16 sz; / 12 2 / u8 start[2]; / 14 2 / } inline_hdr; / 12 4 / struct { __be16 type; / 12 2 / __be16 vlan_tci; / 14 2 / } insert; / 12 4 / __be32 trailer; / 12 4 / }; / 12 4 /
/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg { __be32 byte_count; / 0 4 / __be32 lkey; / 4 4 / __be64 addr; / 8 8 /
/* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};
So, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer sizes.
"pahole" shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe nor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. "objdump -d" shows no meaningful object code changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and optimizations).(CVE-2022-48744)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: LAPIC: Also cancel preemption timer during SET_LAPIC
The below warning is splatting during guest reboot.
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1931 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10322 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x874/0x880 [kvm] CPU: 0 PID: 1931 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G I 5.17.0-rc1+ #5 RIP: 0010:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x874/0x880 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x279/0x710 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fd39797350b
This can be triggered by not exposing tsc-deadline mode and doing a reboot in the guest. The lapic_shutdown() function which is called in sys_reboot path will not disarm the flying timer, it just masks LVTT. lapic_shutdown() clears APIC state w/ LVT_MASKED and timer-mode bit is 0, this can trigger timer-mode switch between tsc-deadline and oneshot/periodic, which can result in preemption timer be cancelled in apic_update_lvtt(). However, We can't depend on this when not exposing tsc-deadline mode and oneshot/periodic modes emulated by preemption timer. Qemu will synchronise states around reset, let's cancel preemption timer under KVM_SET_LAPIC.(CVE-2022-48765)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def
The driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.
The following log reveals it:
[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414 [ 29.612820] Call Trace: [ 29.613030] <TASK> [ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7 [ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190 [ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0 [ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60 [ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40 [ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310 [ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt6779: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52873)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals
In the following sequence: 1) of_platform_depopulate() 2) of_overlay_remove()
During the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed. During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but __of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing of_node_put(): ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...
Indeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal itself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job queued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to function calls. When the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly too late from the workqueue job.
In order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before the of_node destruction, synchronize the of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals.(CVE-2024-35879)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: act_skbmod: prevent kernel-infoleak
syzbot found that tcf_skbmod_dump() was copying four bytes from kernel stack to user space [1].
The issue here is that 'struct tc_skbmod' has a four bytes hole.
We need to clear the structure before filling fields.
[1] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline] simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline] __skb_datagram_iter+0x185/0x1000 net/core/datagram.c:420 skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5c/0x200 net/core/datagram.c:546 skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4050 [inline] netlink_recvmsg+0x432/0x1610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1962 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068 __sys_recvfrom+0x35a/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2242 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2256 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x126/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2256 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was stored to memory at: pskb_expand_head+0x30f/0x19d0 net/core/skbuff.c:2253 netlink_trim+0x2c2/0x330 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317 netlink_unicast+0x9f/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1351 nlmsg_unicast include/net/netlink.h:1144 [inline] nlmsg_notify+0x21d/0x2f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2610 rtnetlink_send+0x73/0x90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:741 rtnetlink_maybe_send include/linux/rtnetlink.h:17 [inline] tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2048 [inline] tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x146e/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2559 rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6613 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf4c/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10df/0x11f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was stored to memory at: __nla_put lib/nlattr.c:1041 [inline] nla_put+0x1c6/0x230 lib/nlattr.c:1099 tcf_skbmod_dump+0x23f/0xc20 net/sched/act_skbmod.c:256 tcf_action_dump_old net/sched/act_api.c:1191 [inline] tcf_action_dump_1+0x85e/0x970 net/sched/act_api.c:1227 tcf_action_dump+0x1fd/0x460 net/sched/act_api.c:1251 tca_get_fill+0x519/0x7a0 net/sched/act_api.c:1628 tcf_add_notify_msg net/sched/act_api.c:2023 [inline] tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2042 [inline] tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x1365/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netli ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35893)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fix race condition between ipv6_get_ifaddr and ipv6_del_addr
Although ipv6_get_ifaddr walks inet6_addr_lst under the RCU lock, it still means hlist_for_each_entry_rcu can return an item that got removed from the list. The memory itself of such item is not freed thanks to RCU but nothing guarantees the actual content of the memory is sane.
In particular, the reference count can be zero. This can happen if ipv6_del_addr is called in parallel. ipv6_del_addr removes the entry from inet6_addr_lst (hlist_del_init_rcu(&ifp->addr_lst)) and drops all references (__in6_ifa_put(ifp) + in6_ifa_put(ifp)). With bad enough timing, this can happen:
-
In ipv6_get_ifaddr, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu returns an entry.
-
Then, the whole ipv6_del_addr is executed for the given entry. The reference count drops to zero and kfree_rcu is scheduled.
-
ipv6_get_ifaddr continues and tries to increments the reference count (in6_ifa_hold).
-
The rcu is unlocked and the entry is freed.
-
The freed entry is returned.
Prevent increasing of the reference count in such case. The name in6_ifa_hold_safe is chosen to mimic the existing fib6_info_hold_safe.
[ 41.506330] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. [ 41.506760] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 595 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.507413] Modules linked in: veth bridge stp llc [ 41.507821] CPU: 0 PID: 595 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2.main-00208-g49563be82afa #14 [ 41.508479] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) [ 41.509163] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.509586] Code: ad ff 90 0f 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d c0 30 ad 01 00 75 a0 c6 05 b7 30 ad 01 01 90 48 c7 c7 38 cc 7a 8c e8 cc 18 ad ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d 98 30 ad 01 00 0f 85 75 ff ff ff [ 41.510956] RSP: 0018:ffffbda3c026baf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 41.511368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e9c46914800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 41.511910] RDX: ffff9e9c7ec29c00 RSI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 RDI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 [ 41.512445] RBP: ffff9e9c43660c9c R08: 0000000000009ffb R09: 00000000ffffdfff [ 41.512998] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff8ca58a40 R12: ffff9e9c4339a000 [ 41.513534] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9e9c438a0000 R15: ffffbda3c026bb48 [ 41.514086] FS: 00007fbc4cda1740(0000) GS:ffff9e9c7ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 41.514726] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 41.515176] CR2: 000056233b337d88 CR3: 000000000376e006 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 41.515713] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 41.516252] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 41.516799] Call Trace: [ 41.517037] <TASK> [ 41.517249] ? __warn+0x7b/0x120 [ 41.517535] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.517923] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190 [ 41.518240] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 [ 41.518541] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 41.520972] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 41.521325] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.521708] ipv6_get_ifaddr+0xda/0xe0 [ 41.522035] inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x342/0x3f0 [ 41.522376] ? __pfx_inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x10/0x10 [ 41.522758] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x334/0x3d0 [ 41.523102] ? netlink_unicast+0x30f/0x390 [ 41.523445] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [ 41.523832] netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 [ 41.524157] netlink_unicast+0x23b/0x390 [ 41.524484] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f2/0x440 [ 41.524826] __sys_sendto+0x1d8/0x1f0 [ 41.525145] __x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30 [ 41.525467] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x1b0 [ 41.525794] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a [ 41.526213] RIP: 0033:0x7fbc4cfcea9a [ 41.526528] Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 7e c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 48 83 ec 30 44 89 [ 41.527942] RSP: 002b:00007f ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35969)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: Fix TASK_SIZE on 64-bit NOMMU
On NOMMU, userspace memory can come from anywhere in physical RAM. The current definition of TASK_SIZE is wrong if any RAM exists above 4G, causing spurious failures in the userspace access routines.(CVE-2024-35988)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: Fix oops during rmmod on single-CPU platforms
During the removal of the idxd driver, registered offline callback is invoked as part of the clean up process. However, on systems with only one CPU online, no valid target is available to migrate the perf context, resulting in a kernel oops:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000000002a2b8
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 1470e1067 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 20 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-dsa+ #57
Hardware name: Intel Corporation AvenueCity/AvenueCity, BIOS BHSDCRB1.86B.2492.D03.2307181620 07/18/2023
RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__die+0x24/0x70
page_fault_oops+0x82/0x160
do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x6b0
__pfx___rdmsr_safe_on_cpu+0x10/0x10
exc_page_fault+0x7d/0x170
asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50
mutex_lock+0x1e/0x50
perf_pmu_migrate_context+0x87/0x1f0
perf_event_cpu_offline+0x76/0x90 [idxd]
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xa2/0x4f0
__pfx_perf_event_cpu_offline+0x10/0x10 [idxd]
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x98/0x150
smpboot_thread_fn+0x27/0x260
smpboot_thread_fn+0x1af/0x260
__pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x103/0x140
__pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
__pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
<TASK>
Fix the issue by preventing the migration of the perf context to an invalid target.(CVE-2024-35989)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/arm/malidp: fix a possible null pointer dereference
In malidp_mw_connector_reset, new memory is allocated with kzalloc, but no check is performed. In order to prevent null pointer dereferencing, ensure that mw_state is checked before calling __drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset.(CVE-2024-36014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tls: fix missing memory barrier in tls_init
In tls_init(), a write memory barrier is missing, and store-store reordering may cause NULL dereference in tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}.
CPU0 CPU1 ----- ----- // In tls_init() // In tls_ctx_create() ctx = kzalloc() ctx->sk_proto = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot) -(1)
// In update_sk_prot() WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, tls_prots) -(2)
// In sock_common_setsockopt()
READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)->setsockopt()
// In tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}()
ctx->sk_proto->setsockopt() -(3)
In the above scenario, when (1) and (2) are reordered, (3) can observe the NULL value of ctx->sk_proto, causing NULL dereference.
To fix it, we rely on rcu_assign_pointer() which implies the release barrier semantic. By moving rcu_assign_pointer() after ctx->sk_proto is initialized, we can ensure that ctx->sk_proto are visible when changing sk->sk_prot.(CVE-2024-36489)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
virtio: delete vq in vp_find_vqs_msix() when request_irq() fails
When request_irq() fails, error path calls vp_del_vqs(). There, as vq is present in the list, free_irq() is called for the same vector. That causes following splat:
[ 0.414355] Trying to free already-free IRQ 27 [ 0.414403] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1899 free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414510] Modules linked in: [ 0.414540] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #27 [ 0.414540] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 [ 0.414540] RIP: 0010:free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] Code: 1e 00 48 83 c4 08 48 89 e8 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 90 8b 74 24 04 48 c7 c7 98 80 6c b1 e8 00 c9 f7 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 89 ee 4c 89 ef e8 e0 20 b8 00 49 8b 47 40 48 8b 40 [ 0.414540] RSP: 0000:ffffb71480013ae0 EFLAGS: 00010086 [ 0.414540] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa099c2722000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 0.414540] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffb71480013998 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 0.414540] RBP: 0000000000000246 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: 0000000000000001 [ 0.414540] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffffb18729c0 R12: ffffa099c1c91760 [ 0.414540] R13: ffffa099c1c916a4 R14: ffffa099c1d2f200 R15: ffffa099c1c91600 [ 0.414540] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa099fec40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.414540] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.414540] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000008e3e001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 0.414540] Call Trace: [ 0.414540] <TASK> [ 0.414540] ? __warn+0x80/0x120 [ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190 [ 0.414540] ? handle_bug+0x3b/0x70 [ 0.414540] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 0.414540] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] vp_del_vqs+0xc1/0x220 [ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs_msix+0x305/0x470 [ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs+0x3e/0x1a0 [ 0.414540] vp_modern_find_vqs+0x1b/0x70 [ 0.414540] init_vqs+0x387/0x600 [ 0.414540] virtnet_probe+0x50a/0xc80 [ 0.414540] virtio_dev_probe+0x1e0/0x2b0 [ 0.414540] really_probe+0xc0/0x2c0 [ 0.414540] ? __pfxdriverattach+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] driver_probe_device+0x73/0x120 [ 0.414540] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xe0 [ 0.414540] __driver_attach+0x88/0x180 [ 0.414540] bus_for_each_dev+0x85/0xd0 [ 0.414540] bus_add_driver+0xec/0x1f0 [ 0.414540] driver_register+0x59/0x100 [ 0.414540] ? __pfx_virtio_net_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] virtio_net_driver_init+0x90/0xb0 [ 0.414540] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x230 [ 0.414540] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x2d0 [ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] kernel_init+0x1a/0x1c0 [ 0.414540] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 [ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10 [ 0.414540] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 0.414540] </TASK>
Fix this by calling deleting the current vq when request_irq() fails.(CVE-2024-37353)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix crash on racing fsync and size-extending write into prealloc
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in btrfs_set_item_key_safe():
BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]
With the following stack trace:
#0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4) #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4) #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9) #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9) #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9) #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8) #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8) #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8) #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9) #9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9) #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9) #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9) #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1) #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14) #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7) #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree, triggering the BUG().
This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py) to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:
>>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"]) leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610 leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000 fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677 chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC) atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43) ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44) otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16) item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13 index 195 namelen 3 name: 193 item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37 location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6 name: user.a data a item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288 extent compression 0 (none) item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192 item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 2 (prealloc) prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288 prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096 ...
So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5 (8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and item 5 starts at i_size.
Here is the state of ---truncated---(CVE-2024-37354)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]
nci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev->rx_q. It should be validated header size, payload size and total packet size before processing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be silently discarded.(CVE-2024-38381)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: atomisp: ssh_css: Fix a null-pointer dereference in load_video_binaries
The allocation failure of mycs->yuv_scaler_binary in load_video_binaries() is followed with a dereference of mycs->yuv_scaler_binary after the following call chain:
sh_css_pipe_load_binaries() |-> load_video_binaries(mycs->yuv_scaler_binary == NULL) | |-> sh_css_pipe_unload_binaries() |-> unload_video_binaries()
In unload_video_binaries(), it calls to ia_css_binary_unload with argument &pipe->pipe_settings.video.yuv_scaler_binary[i], which refers to the same memory slot as mycs->yuv_scaler_binary. Thus, a null-pointer dereference is triggered.(CVE-2024-38547)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function
Fixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).
The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds, an error message is logged and the function returns false to indicate an error.
Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max(CVE-2024-38552)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks
There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the commit ac0a230f719b ("eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks"). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the .ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver, so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device
There is a reference count leak issue of the object "net_device" in ax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one or zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause memory leak.
In order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of net_device after dev->ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rcu-tasks: Fix show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread buffer overflow
There is a possibility of buffer overflow in show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed to sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this are unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still possible.
Use snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38577)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic
In spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len instead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the buffer boundaries. Fix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()
Syzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called during nilfs2 unmount.
Analysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which synchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after nilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace below:
nilfs_detach_log_writer nilfs_segctor_destroy nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --> Shut down log writer thread flush_work nilfs_iput_work_func nilfs_dispose_list iput nilfs_evict_inode nilfs_transaction_commit nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync) nilfs_segctor_sync --> Attempt to synchronize with log writer thread *** DEADLOCK ***
Fix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer thread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by forcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread terminates.
The skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the subsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread
Patch series "nilfs2: fix log writer related issues".
This bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues, including a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on unmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found during their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.
This patch (of 3):
A use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on the nilfs_sc_info structure.
The problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log writer thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure is about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread's lifetime.
Fix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer thread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Modify the print level of CQE error
Too much print may lead to a panic in kernel. Change ibdev_err() to ibdev_err_ratelimited(), and change the printing level of cqe dump to debug level.(CVE-2024-38590)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: Fix data races in unix_release_sock/unix_stream_sendmsg
A data-race condition has been identified in af_unix. In one data path, the write function unix_release_sock() atomically writes to sk->sk_shutdown using WRITE_ONCE. However, on the reader side, unix_stream_sendmsg() does not read it atomically. Consequently, this issue is causing the following KCSAN splat to occur:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in unix_release_sock / unix_stream_sendmsg
write (marked) to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 7270 on cpu 28:
unix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:640)
unix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050)
sock_close (net/socket.c:659 net/socket.c:1421)
__fput (fs/file_table.c:422)
__fput_sync (fs/file_table.c:508)
__se_sys_close (fs/open.c:1559 fs/open.c:1541)
__x64_sys_close (fs/open.c:1541)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
read to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 989 on cpu 14:
unix_stream_sendmsg (net/unix/af_unix.c:2273)
__sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:730 net/socket.c:745)
____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2584)
__sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2638 net/socket.c:2724)
__x64_sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2753 net/socket.c:2750 net/socket.c:2750)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
value changed: 0x01 -> 0x03
The line numbers are related to commit dd5a440a31fa ("Linux 6.9-rc7").
Commit e1d09c2c2f57 ("af_unix: Fix data races around sk->sk_shutdown.") addressed a comparable issue in the past regarding sk->sk_shutdown. However, it overlooked resolving this particular data path. This patch only offending unix_stream_sendmsg() function, since the other reads seem to be protected by unix_state_lock() as discussed in(CVE-2024-38596)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix reference count leak issues of ax25_dev
The ax25_addr_ax25dev() and ax25_dev_device_down() exist a reference count leak issue of the object "ax25_dev".
Memory leak issue in ax25_addr_ax25dev():
The reference count of the object "ax25_dev" can be increased multiple times in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). This will cause a memory leak.
Memory leak issues in ax25_dev_device_down():
The reference count of ax25_dev is set to 1 in ax25_dev_device_up() and then increase the reference count when ax25_dev is added to ax25_dev_list. As a result, the reference count of ax25_dev is 2. But when the device is shutting down. The ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count once or twice depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause memory leak.
As for the issue of ax25_addr_ax25dev(), it is impossible for one pointer to be on a list twice. So add a break in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). As for the issue of ax25_dev_device_down(), increase the reference count of ax25_dev once in ax25_dev_device_up() and decrease the reference count of ax25_dev after it is removed from the ax25_dev_list.(CVE-2024-38602)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Actually use devm_add_action_or_reset()
pci_alloc_irq_vectors() allocates an irq vector. When devm_add_action() fails, the irq vector is not freed, which leads to a memory leak.
Replace the devm_add_action with devm_add_action_or_reset to ensure the irq vector can be destroyed when it fails.(CVE-2024-38603)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Check 'folio' pointer for NULL
It can be NULL if bmap is called.(CVE-2024-38625)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal
The removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal of the driver. However, code doesn't update the respective global variable and after insmod — rmmod — insmod cycle the kernel oopses:
max3100 spi-PRP0001:01: max3100_probe: adding port 0 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000408 ... RIP: 0010:serial_core_register_port+0xa0/0x840 ... max3100_probe+0x1b6/0x280 [max3100] spi_probe+0x8d/0xb0
Update the actual state so next time UART driver will be registered again.
Hugo also noticed, that the error path in the probe also affected by having the variable set, and not cleared. Instead of clearing it move the assignment after the successfull uart_register_driver() call.(CVE-2024-38633)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode
If channel for the given node is not found we return null from get_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer before using it in two of the missing places.
This was originally reported in [0]: Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-buf/sw-sync: don't enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()
Since commit a6aa8fca4d79 ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from known context") by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with spin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite sync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains inconsistent lock state warning.
Use plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for sync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()
Syzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline] p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline] new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391 slaballoc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525 slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852 p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline] p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641 p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688 p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031 v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410 v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122 legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797 do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352 path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
If p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req->rc.tag will not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res() ends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc() finishes.
Fix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields such as 'tag' and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) 'id' during the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-39362)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid in sanity_check_inode()
syzbot reports a kernel bug as below:
F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 48b305e4
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88807a58c76c by task syz-executor280/5076
CPU: 1 PID: 5076 Comm: syz-executor280 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline] current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline] f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600 f2fs_xattr_fiemap fs/f2fs/data.c:1848 [inline] f2fs_fiemap+0x55d/0x1ee0 fs/f2fs/data.c:1925 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1c07/0x2e50 fs/ioctl.c:838 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:902 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x81/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
The root cause is we missed to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid during f2fs_iget(), so that in fiemap() path, current_nat_addr() will access nat_bitmap w/ offset from invalid i_xattr_nid, result in triggering kasan bug report, fix it.(CVE-2024-39467)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.84.0.165.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nARM: 9170/1: fix panic when kasan and kprobe are enabled\r\n\r\narm32 uses software to simulate the instruction replaced\nby kprobe. some instructions may be simulated by constructing\nassembly functions. therefore, before executing instruction\nsimulation, it is necessary to construct assembly function\nexecution environment in C language through binding registers.\nafter kasan is enabled, the register binding relationship will\nbe destroyed, resulting in instruction simulation errors and\ncausing kernel panic.\r\n\r\nthe kprobe emulate instruction function is distributed in three\nfiles: actions-common.c actions-arm.c actions-thumb.c, so disable\nKASAN when compiling these files.\r\n\r\nfor example, use kprobe insert on cap_capable+20 after kasan\nenabled, the cap_capable assembly code is as follows:\n\u0026lt;cap_capable\u0026gt;:\ne92d47f0\tpush\t{r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, lr}\ne1a05000\tmov\tr5, r0\ne280006c\tadd\tr0, r0, #108 ; 0x6c\ne1a04001\tmov\tr4, r1\ne1a06002\tmov\tr6, r2\ne59fa090\tldr\tsl, [pc, #144] ;\nebfc7bf8\tbl\tc03aa4b4 \u0026lt;__asan_load4\u0026gt;\ne595706c\tldr\tr7, [r5, #108] ; 0x6c\ne2859014\tadd\tr9, r5, #20\n......\nThe emulate_ldr assembly code after enabling kasan is as follows:\nc06f1384 \u0026lt;emulate_ldr\u0026gt;:\ne92d47f0\tpush\t{r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, lr}\ne282803c\tadd\tr8, r2, #60 ; 0x3c\ne1a05000\tmov\tr5, r0\ne7e37855\tubfx\tr7, r5, #16, #4\ne1a00008\tmov\tr0, r8\ne1a09001\tmov\tr9, r1\ne1a04002\tmov\tr4, r2\nebf35462\tbl\tc03c6530 \u0026lt;__asan_load4\u0026gt;\ne357000f\tcmp\tr7, #15\ne7e36655\tubfx\tr6, r5, #12, #4\ne205a00f\tand\tsl, r5, #15\n0a000001\tbeq\tc06f13bc \u0026lt;emulate_ldr+0x38\u0026gt;\ne0840107\tadd\tr0, r4, r7, lsl #2\nebf3545c\tbl\tc03c6530 \u0026lt;__asan_load4\u0026gt;\ne084010a\tadd\tr0, r4, sl, lsl #2\nebf3545a\tbl\tc03c6530 \u0026lt;__asan_load4\u0026gt;\ne2890010\tadd\tr0, r9, #16\nebf35458\tbl\tc03c6530 \u0026lt;__asan_load4\u0026gt;\ne5990010\tldr\tr0, [r9, #16]\ne12fff30\tblx\tr0\ne356000f\tcm\tr6, #15\n1a000014\tbne\tc06f1430 \u0026lt;emulate_ldr+0xac\u0026gt;\ne1a06000\tmov\tr6, r0\ne2840040\tadd\tr0, r4, #64 ; 0x40\n......\r\n\r\nwhen running in emulate_ldr to simulate the ldr instruction, panic\noccurred, and the log is as follows:\nUnable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address\n00000090\npgd = ecb46400\n[00000090] *pgd=2e0fa003, *pmd=00000000\nInternal error: Oops: 206 [#1] SMP ARM\nPC is at cap_capable+0x14/0xb0\nLR is at emulate_ldr+0x50/0xc0\npsr: 600d0293 sp : ecd63af8 ip : 00000004 fp : c0a7c30c\nr10: 00000000 r9 : c30897f4 r8 : ecd63cd4\nr7 : 0000000f r6 : 0000000a r5 : e59fa090 r4 : ecd63c98\nr3 : c06ae294 r2 : 00000000 r1 : b7611300 r0 : bf4ec008\nFlags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user\nControl: 32c5387d Table: 2d546400 DAC: 55555555\nProcess bash (pid: 1643, stack limit = 0xecd60190)\n(cap_capable) from (kprobe_handler+0x218/0x340)\n(kprobe_handler) from (kprobe_trap_handler+0x24/0x48)\n(kprobe_trap_handler) from (do_undefinstr+0x13c/0x364)\n(do_undefinstr) from (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x30)\n(__und_svc_finish) from (cap_capable+0x18/0xb0)\n(cap_capable) from (cap_vm_enough_memory+0x38/0x48)\n(cap_vm_enough_memory) from\n(security_vm_enough_memory_mm+0x48/0x6c)\n(security_vm_enough_memory_mm) from\n(copy_process.constprop.5+0x16b4/0x25c8)\n(copy_process.constprop.5) from (_do_fork+0xe8/0x55c)\n(_do_fork) from (SyS_clone+0x1c/0x24)\n(SyS_clone) from (__sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10)\nCode: 0050a0e1 6c0080e2 0140a0e1 0260a0e1 (f801f0e7)(CVE-2021-47618)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot\r\n\r\nAt ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and\nthen attach it to the transaction\u0026apos;s list of pending snapshots. After that\nwe call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump\nto \u0026apos;fail\u0026apos; label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can\nresult in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:\r\n\r\n1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction\u0026apos;s\n list of pending snapshots;\r\n\r\n2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first\n call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().\n In both cases, we don\u0026apos;t abort the transaction and we release our\n transaction handle. We jump to the \u0026apos;fail\u0026apos; label and free the pending\n snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the\n transaction\u0026apos;s list;\r\n\r\n3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there\u0026apos;s no error at\n all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer\n to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task\n has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.\r\n\r\nThis issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the\nfollowing warning:\r\n\r\n fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: \u0026apos;\u0026amp;pending_snapshot-\u0026gt;list\u0026apos; not removed from list\r\n\r\nSo fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the\npending snapshot to the transaction\u0026apos;s list. Instead add the pending\nsnapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()\nwe add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error\nreturned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which\ncase the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can\naccess it anymore.(CVE-2022-48733)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()\r\n\r\nIn preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time\nfield bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid\nintentionally writing across neighboring fields.\r\n\r\nUse flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they\nare always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves\nthat can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.\r\n\r\nWe were doing:\r\n\r\n\t#define ETH_HLEN 14\n\t#define VLAN_HLEN 4\n\t...\n\t#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)\n\t...\n struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);\n\t...\n struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = \u0026amp;wqe-\u0026gt;eth;\n struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe-\u0026gt;data;\n\t...\n\tmemcpy(eseg-\u0026gt;inline_hdr.start, xdptxd-\u0026gt;data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);\r\n\r\ntarget is wqe-\u0026gt;eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being\n2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start\n(really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into\nwqe-\u0026gt;data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr\n(8 bytes).\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5e_tx_wqe {\n struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; /* 0 16 */\n struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; /* 16 16 */\n struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; /* 32 0 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */\n /* last cacheline: 32 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg {\n u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; /* 0 1 */\n u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; /* 1 1 */\n u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; /* 2 1 */\n u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; /* 3 1 */\n u8 cs_flags; /* 4 1 */\n u8 swp_flags; /* 5 1 */\n __be16 mss; /* 6 2 */\n __be32 flow_table_metadata; /* 8 4 */\n union {\n struct {\n __be16 sz; /* 12 2 */\n u8 start[2]; /* 14 2 */\n } inline_hdr; /* 12 4 */\n struct {\n __be16 type; /* 12 2 */\n __be16 vlan_tci; /* 14 2 */\n } insert; /* 12 4 */\n __be32 trailer; /* 12 4 */\n }; /* 12 4 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */\n /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nstruct mlx5_wqe_data_seg {\n __be32 byte_count; /* 0 4 */\n __be32 lkey; /* 4 4 */\n __be64 addr; /* 8 8 */\r\n\r\n /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */\n /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */\n};\r\n\r\nSo, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer\nsizes.\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;pahole\u0026quot; shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe\nnor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. \u0026quot;objdump -d\u0026quot; shows no meaningful object\ncode changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and\noptimizations).(CVE-2022-48744)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: LAPIC: Also cancel preemption timer during SET_LAPIC\r\n\r\nThe below warning is splatting during guest reboot.\r\n\r\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1931 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10322 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x874/0x880 [kvm]\n CPU: 0 PID: 1931 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G I 5.17.0-rc1+ #5\n RIP: 0010:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x874/0x880 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x279/0x710 [kvm]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0\n do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n RIP: 0033:0x7fd39797350b\r\n\r\nThis can be triggered by not exposing tsc-deadline mode and doing a reboot in\nthe guest. The lapic_shutdown() function which is called in sys_reboot path\nwill not disarm the flying timer, it just masks LVTT. lapic_shutdown() clears\nAPIC state w/ LVT_MASKED and timer-mode bit is 0, this can trigger timer-mode\nswitch between tsc-deadline and oneshot/periodic, which can result in preemption\ntimer be cancelled in apic_update_lvtt(). However, We can\u0026apos;t depend on this when\nnot exposing tsc-deadline mode and oneshot/periodic modes emulated by preemption\ntimer. Qemu will synchronise states around reset, let\u0026apos;s cancel preemption timer\nunder KVM_SET_LAPIC.(CVE-2022-48765)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: lgdt3306a: Add a check against null-pointer-def\r\n\r\nThe driver should check whether the client provides the platform_data.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 29.610324] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.610730] Read of size 40 at addr 0000000000000000 by task bash/414\n[ 29.612820] Call Trace:\n[ 29.613030] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 29.613201] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f\n[ 29.613496] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.613754] print_report.cold+0x494/0x6b7\n[ 29.614082] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614340] kasan_report+0x8a/0x190\n[ 29.614628] ? kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.614888] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0\n[ 29.615213] memcpy+0x20/0x60\n[ 29.615454] kmemdup+0x30/0x40\n[ 29.615700] lgdt3306a_probe+0x52/0x310\n[ 29.616339] i2c_device_probe+0x951/0xa90(CVE-2022-48772)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt6779: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52873)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nof: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals\r\n\r\nIn the following sequence:\n 1) of_platform_depopulate()\n 2) of_overlay_remove()\r\n\r\nDuring the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed.\nDuring the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but\n__of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing\nof_node_put():\n ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...\r\n\r\nIndeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal\nitself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job\nqueued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to\nfunction calls.\nWhen the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly\ntoo late from the workqueue job.\r\n\r\nIn order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before\nthe of_node destruction, synchronize the of_changeset_destroy() with the\ndevlink removals.(CVE-2024-35879)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: act_skbmod: prevent kernel-infoleak\r\n\r\nsyzbot found that tcf_skbmod_dump() was copying four bytes\nfrom kernel stack to user space [1].\r\n\r\nThe issue here is that \u0026apos;struct tc_skbmod\u0026apos; has a four bytes hole.\r\n\r\nWe need to clear the structure before filling fields.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]\n copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline]\n iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline]\n iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline]\n _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185\n copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline]\n simple_copy_to_iter net/core/datagram.c:532 [inline]\n __skb_datagram_iter+0x185/0x1000 net/core/datagram.c:420\n skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5c/0x200 net/core/datagram.c:546\n skb_copy_datagram_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4050 [inline]\n netlink_recvmsg+0x432/0x1610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1962\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068\n __sys_recvfrom+0x35a/0x5f0 net/socket.c:2242\n __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2260 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2256 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x126/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2256\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n pskb_expand_head+0x30f/0x19d0 net/core/skbuff.c:2253\n netlink_trim+0x2c2/0x330 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317\n netlink_unicast+0x9f/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1351\n nlmsg_unicast include/net/netlink.h:1144 [inline]\n nlmsg_notify+0x21d/0x2f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2610\n rtnetlink_send+0x73/0x90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:741\n rtnetlink_maybe_send include/linux/rtnetlink.h:17 [inline]\n tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2048 [inline]\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x146e/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2559\n rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6613\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xf4c/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10df/0x11f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n __nla_put lib/nlattr.c:1041 [inline]\n nla_put+0x1c6/0x230 lib/nlattr.c:1099\n tcf_skbmod_dump+0x23f/0xc20 net/sched/act_skbmod.c:256\n tcf_action_dump_old net/sched/act_api.c:1191 [inline]\n tcf_action_dump_1+0x85e/0x970 net/sched/act_api.c:1227\n tcf_action_dump+0x1fd/0x460 net/sched/act_api.c:1251\n tca_get_fill+0x519/0x7a0 net/sched/act_api.c:1628\n tcf_add_notify_msg net/sched/act_api.c:2023 [inline]\n tcf_add_notify net/sched/act_api.c:2042 [inline]\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2071 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x1365/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2119\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1737/0x1900 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6595\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netli\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35893)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: fix race condition between ipv6_get_ifaddr and ipv6_del_addr\r\n\r\nAlthough ipv6_get_ifaddr walks inet6_addr_lst under the RCU lock, it\nstill means hlist_for_each_entry_rcu can return an item that got removed\nfrom the list. The memory itself of such item is not freed thanks to RCU\nbut nothing guarantees the actual content of the memory is sane.\r\n\r\nIn particular, the reference count can be zero. This can happen if\nipv6_del_addr is called in parallel. ipv6_del_addr removes the entry\nfrom inet6_addr_lst (hlist_del_init_rcu(\u0026amp;ifp-\u0026gt;addr_lst)) and drops all\nreferences (__in6_ifa_put(ifp) + in6_ifa_put(ifp)). With bad enough\ntiming, this can happen:\r\n\r\n1. In ipv6_get_ifaddr, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu returns an entry.\r\n\r\n2. Then, the whole ipv6_del_addr is executed for the given entry. The\n reference count drops to zero and kfree_rcu is scheduled.\r\n\r\n3. ipv6_get_ifaddr continues and tries to increments the reference count\n (in6_ifa_hold).\r\n\r\n4. The rcu is unlocked and the entry is freed.\r\n\r\n5. The freed entry is returned.\r\n\r\nPrevent increasing of the reference count in such case. The name\nin6_ifa_hold_safe is chosen to mimic the existing fib6_info_hold_safe.\r\n\r\n[ 41.506330] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n[ 41.506760] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 595 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130\n[ 41.507413] Modules linked in: veth bridge stp llc\n[ 41.507821] CPU: 0 PID: 595 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2.main-00208-g49563be82afa #14\n[ 41.508479] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)\n[ 41.509163] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130\n[ 41.509586] Code: ad ff 90 0f 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d c0 30 ad 01 00 75 a0 c6 05 b7 30 ad 01 01 90 48 c7 c7 38 cc 7a 8c e8 cc 18 ad ff 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d 98 30 ad 01 00 0f 85 75 ff ff ff\n[ 41.510956] RSP: 0018:ffffbda3c026baf0 EFLAGS: 00010282\n[ 41.511368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e9c46914800 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[ 41.511910] RDX: ffff9e9c7ec29c00 RSI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 RDI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900\n[ 41.512445] RBP: ffff9e9c43660c9c R08: 0000000000009ffb R09: 00000000ffffdfff\n[ 41.512998] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff8ca58a40 R12: ffff9e9c4339a000\n[ 41.513534] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9e9c438a0000 R15: ffffbda3c026bb48\n[ 41.514086] FS: 00007fbc4cda1740(0000) GS:ffff9e9c7ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 41.514726] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 41.515176] CR2: 000056233b337d88 CR3: 000000000376e006 CR4: 0000000000370ef0\n[ 41.515713] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 41.516252] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 41.516799] Call Trace:\n[ 41.517037] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 41.517249] ? __warn+0x7b/0x120\n[ 41.517535] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130\n[ 41.517923] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190\n[ 41.518240] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70\n[ 41.518541] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70\n[ 41.520972] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[ 41.521325] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130\n[ 41.521708] ipv6_get_ifaddr+0xda/0xe0\n[ 41.522035] inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x342/0x3f0\n[ 41.522376] ? __pfx_inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x10/0x10\n[ 41.522758] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x334/0x3d0\n[ 41.523102] ? netlink_unicast+0x30f/0x390\n[ 41.523445] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10\n[ 41.523832] netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100\n[ 41.524157] netlink_unicast+0x23b/0x390\n[ 41.524484] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f2/0x440\n[ 41.524826] __sys_sendto+0x1d8/0x1f0\n[ 41.525145] __x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30\n[ 41.525467] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x1b0\n[ 41.525794] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a\n[ 41.526213] RIP: 0033:0x7fbc4cfcea9a\n[ 41.526528] Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 7e c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 48 83 ec 30 44 89\n[ 41.527942] RSP: 002b:00007f\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35969)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: Fix TASK_SIZE on 64-bit NOMMU\r\n\r\nOn NOMMU, userspace memory can come from anywhere in physical RAM. The\ncurrent definition of TASK_SIZE is wrong if any RAM exists above 4G,\ncausing spurious failures in the userspace access routines.(CVE-2024-35988)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: idxd: Fix oops during rmmod on single-CPU platforms\r\n\r\nDuring the removal of the idxd driver, registered offline callback is\ninvoked as part of the clean up process. However, on systems with only\none CPU online, no valid target is available to migrate the\nperf context, resulting in a kernel oops:\r\n\r\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000000002a2b8\n #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n PGD 1470e1067 P4D 0\n Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n CPU: 0 PID: 20 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-dsa+ #57\n Hardware name: Intel Corporation AvenueCity/AvenueCity, BIOS BHSDCRB1.86B.2492.D03.2307181620 07/18/2023\n RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __die+0x24/0x70\n page_fault_oops+0x82/0x160\n do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x6b0\n __pfx___rdmsr_safe_on_cpu+0x10/0x10\n exc_page_fault+0x7d/0x170\n asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n mutex_lock+0x2e/0x50\n mutex_lock+0x1e/0x50\n perf_pmu_migrate_context+0x87/0x1f0\n perf_event_cpu_offline+0x76/0x90 [idxd]\n cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xa2/0x4f0\n __pfx_perf_event_cpu_offline+0x10/0x10 [idxd]\n cpuhp_thread_fun+0x98/0x150\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x27/0x260\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x1af/0x260\n __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0x103/0x140\n __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nFix the issue by preventing the migration of the perf context to an\ninvalid target.(CVE-2024-35989)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/arm/malidp: fix a possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn malidp_mw_connector_reset, new memory is allocated with kzalloc, but\nno check is performed. In order to prevent null pointer dereferencing,\nensure that mw_state is checked before calling\n__drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset.(CVE-2024-36014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntls: fix missing memory barrier in tls_init\r\n\r\nIn tls_init(), a write memory barrier is missing, and store-store\nreordering may cause NULL dereference in tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}.\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\n----- -----\n// In tls_init()\n// In tls_ctx_create()\nctx = kzalloc()\nctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto = READ_ONCE(sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot) -(1)\r\n\r\n// In update_sk_prot()\nWRITE_ONCE(sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot, tls_prots) -(2)\r\n\r\n // In sock_common_setsockopt()\n READ_ONCE(sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot)-\u0026gt;setsockopt()\r\n\r\n // In tls_{setsockopt,getsockopt}()\n ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto-\u0026gt;setsockopt() -(3)\r\n\r\nIn the above scenario, when (1) and (2) are reordered, (3) can observe\nthe NULL value of ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto, causing NULL dereference.\r\n\r\nTo fix it, we rely on rcu_assign_pointer() which implies the release\nbarrier semantic. By moving rcu_assign_pointer() after ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto is\ninitialized, we can ensure that ctx-\u0026gt;sk_proto are visible when\nchanging sk-\u0026gt;sk_prot.(CVE-2024-36489)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvirtio: delete vq in vp_find_vqs_msix() when request_irq() fails\r\n\r\nWhen request_irq() fails, error path calls vp_del_vqs(). There, as vq is\npresent in the list, free_irq() is called for the same vector. That\ncauses following splat:\r\n\r\n[ 0.414355] Trying to free already-free IRQ 27\n[ 0.414403] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1899 free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414510] Modules linked in:\n[ 0.414540] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #27\n[ 0.414540] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014\n[ 0.414540] RIP: 0010:free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] Code: 1e 00 48 83 c4 08 48 89 e8 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 90 8b 74 24 04 48 c7 c7 98 80 6c b1 e8 00 c9 f7 ff 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 48 89 ee 4c 89 ef e8 e0 20 b8 00 49 8b 47 40 48 8b 40\n[ 0.414540] RSP: 0000:ffffb71480013ae0 EFLAGS: 00010086\n[ 0.414540] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa099c2722000 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[ 0.414540] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffb71480013998 RDI: 0000000000000001\n[ 0.414540] RBP: 0000000000000246 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: 0000000000000001\n[ 0.414540] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffffb18729c0 R12: ffffa099c1c91760\n[ 0.414540] R13: ffffa099c1c916a4 R14: ffffa099c1d2f200 R15: ffffa099c1c91600\n[ 0.414540] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa099fec40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 0.414540] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 0.414540] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000008e3e001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0\n[ 0.414540] Call Trace:\n[ 0.414540] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 0.414540] ? __warn+0x80/0x120\n[ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190\n[ 0.414540] ? handle_bug+0x3b/0x70\n[ 0.414540] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70\n[ 0.414540] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[ 0.414540] ? free_irq+0x1a1/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] vp_del_vqs+0xc1/0x220\n[ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs_msix+0x305/0x470\n[ 0.414540] vp_find_vqs+0x3e/0x1a0\n[ 0.414540] vp_modern_find_vqs+0x1b/0x70\n[ 0.414540] init_vqs+0x387/0x600\n[ 0.414540] virtnet_probe+0x50a/0xc80\n[ 0.414540] virtio_dev_probe+0x1e0/0x2b0\n[ 0.414540] really_probe+0xc0/0x2c0\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x120\n[ 0.414540] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xe0\n[ 0.414540] __driver_attach+0x88/0x180\n[ 0.414540] bus_for_each_dev+0x85/0xd0\n[ 0.414540] bus_add_driver+0xec/0x1f0\n[ 0.414540] driver_register+0x59/0x100\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx_virtio_net_driver_init+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] virtio_net_driver_init+0x90/0xb0\n[ 0.414540] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x230\n[ 0.414540] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x2d0\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] kernel_init+0x1a/0x1c0\n[ 0.414540] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n[ 0.414540] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10\n[ 0.414540] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n[ 0.414540] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nFix this by calling deleting the current vq when request_irq() fails.(CVE-2024-37353)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: fix crash on racing fsync and size-extending write into prealloc\r\n\r\nWe have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in\nbtrfs_set_item_key_safe():\r\n\r\n BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192)\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620!\n invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]\r\n\r\nWith the following stack trace:\r\n\r\n #0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4)\n #1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4)\n #2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9)\n #3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9)\n #4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9)\n #5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8)\n #6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8)\n #7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8)\n #8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9)\n #9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9)\n #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9)\n #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9)\n #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)\n #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)\n #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14)\n #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7)\n #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)\r\n\r\nSo we\u0026apos;re logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an\nextent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree,\ntriggering the BUG().\r\n\r\nThis is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with\ndrgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py)\nto get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:\r\n\r\n \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0026quot;eb\u0026quot;])\n leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610\n leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000\n fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677\n chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da\n item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160\n generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198\n block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0\n sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)\n atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)\n ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)\n mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)\n otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16)\n item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13\n index 195 namelen 3 name: 193\n item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37\n location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR\n transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6\n name: user.a\n data a\n item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53\n generation 9 type 1 (regular)\n extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288\n extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288\n extent compression 0 (none)\n item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53\n generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)\n prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288\n prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192\n item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53\n generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)\n prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288\n prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096\n ...\r\n\r\nSo the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5\n(8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and\nitem 5 starts at i_size.\r\n\r\nHere is the state of \n---truncated---(CVE-2024-37354)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_rx_work\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]\r\n\r\nnci_rx_work() parses received packet from ndev-\u0026gt;rx_q. It should be\nvalidated header size, payload size and total packet size before\nprocessing the packet. If an invalid packet is detected, it should be\nsilently discarded.(CVE-2024-38381)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: atomisp: ssh_css: Fix a null-pointer dereference in load_video_binaries\r\n\r\nThe allocation failure of mycs-\u0026gt;yuv_scaler_binary in load_video_binaries()\nis followed with a dereference of mycs-\u0026gt;yuv_scaler_binary after the\nfollowing call chain:\r\n\r\nsh_css_pipe_load_binaries()\n |-\u0026gt; load_video_binaries(mycs-\u0026gt;yuv_scaler_binary == NULL)\n |\n |-\u0026gt; sh_css_pipe_unload_binaries()\n |-\u0026gt; unload_video_binaries()\r\n\r\nIn unload_video_binaries(), it calls to ia_css_binary_unload with argument\n\u0026amp;pipe-\u0026gt;pipe_settings.video.yuv_scaler_binary[i], which refers to the\nsame memory slot as mycs-\u0026gt;yuv_scaler_binary. Thus, a null-pointer\ndereference is triggered.(CVE-2024-38547)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential index out of bounds in color transformation function\r\n\r\nFixes index out of bounds issue in the color transformation function.\nThe issue could occur when the index \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; exceeds the number of transfer\nfunction points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS).\r\n\r\nThe fix adds a check to ensure \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is within bounds before accessing the\ntransfer function points. If \u0026apos;i\u0026apos; is out of bounds, an error message is\nlogged and the function returns false to indicate an error.\r\n\r\nReported by smatch:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:405 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.red\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:406 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.green\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:407 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_hw_format() error: buffer overflow \u0026apos;output_tf-\u0026gt;tf_pts.blue\u0026apos; 1025 \u0026lt;= s32max(CVE-2024-38552)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks\r\n\r\nThere is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the\ncommit ac0a230f719b (\u0026quot;eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid\ndeadlocks\u0026quot;). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic\ncontext and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface\nof sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing\nthe implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have\nthe same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the\n.ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver,\nso fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix reference count leak issue of net_device\r\n\r\nThere is a reference count leak issue of the object \u0026quot;net_device\u0026quot; in\nax25_dev_device_down(). When the ax25 device is shutting down, the\nax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count of net_device one\nor zero times depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will\ncause memory leak.\r\n\r\nIn order to solve the above issue, decrease the reference count of\nnet_device after dev-\u0026gt;ax25_ptr is set to null.(CVE-2024-38554)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrcu-tasks: Fix show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread buffer overflow\r\n\r\nThere is a possibility of buffer overflow in\nshow_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed\nto sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this\nare unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still\npossible.\r\n\r\nUse snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38577)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncrypto: bcm - Fix pointer arithmetic\r\n\r\nIn spu2_dump_omd() value of ptr is increased by ciph_key_len\ninstead of hash_iv_len which could lead to going beyond the\nbuffer boundaries.\nFix this bug by changing ciph_key_len to hash_iv_len.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-38579)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer()\r\n\r\nSyzbot has reported a potential hang in nilfs_detach_log_writer() called\nduring nilfs2 unmount.\r\n\r\nAnalysis revealed that this is because nilfs_segctor_sync(), which\nsynchronizes with the log writer thread, can be called after\nnilfs_segctor_destroy() terminates that thread, as shown in the call trace\nbelow:\r\n\r\nnilfs_detach_log_writer\n nilfs_segctor_destroy\n nilfs_segctor_kill_thread --\u0026gt; Shut down log writer thread\n flush_work\n nilfs_iput_work_func\n nilfs_dispose_list\n iput\n nilfs_evict_inode\n nilfs_transaction_commit\n nilfs_construct_segment (if inode needs sync)\n nilfs_segctor_sync --\u0026gt; Attempt to synchronize with\n log writer thread\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\nFix this issue by changing nilfs_segctor_sync() so that the log writer\nthread returns normally without synchronizing after it terminates, and by\nforcing tasks that are already waiting to complete once after the thread\nterminates.\r\n\r\nThe skipped inode metadata flushout will then be processed together in the\nsubsequent cleanup work in nilfs_segctor_destroy().(CVE-2024-38582)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix use-after-free of timer for log writer thread\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;nilfs2: fix log writer related issues\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nThis bug fix series covers three nilfs2 log writer-related issues,\nincluding a timer use-after-free issue and potential deadlock issue on\nunmount, and a potential freeze issue in event synchronization found\nduring their analysis. Details are described in each commit log.\r\n\r\n\nThis patch (of 3):\r\n\r\nA use-after-free issue has been reported regarding the timer sc_timer on\nthe nilfs_sc_info structure.\r\n\r\nThe problem is that even though it is used to wake up a sleeping log\nwriter thread, sc_timer is not shut down until the nilfs_sc_info structure\nis about to be freed, and is used regardless of the thread\u0026apos;s lifetime.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by limiting the use of sc_timer only while the log writer\nthread is alive.(CVE-2024-38583)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nRDMA/hns: Modify the print level of CQE error\r\n\r\nToo much print may lead to a panic in kernel. Change ibdev_err() to\nibdev_err_ratelimited(), and change the printing level of cqe dump\nto debug level.(CVE-2024-38590)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\naf_unix: Fix data races in unix_release_sock/unix_stream_sendmsg\r\n\r\nA data-race condition has been identified in af_unix. In one data path,\nthe write function unix_release_sock() atomically writes to\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown using WRITE_ONCE. However, on the reader side,\nunix_stream_sendmsg() does not read it atomically. Consequently, this\nissue is causing the following KCSAN splat to occur:\r\n\r\n\tBUG: KCSAN: data-race in unix_release_sock / unix_stream_sendmsg\r\n\r\n\twrite (marked) to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 7270 on cpu 28:\n\tunix_release_sock (net/unix/af_unix.c:640)\n\tunix_release (net/unix/af_unix.c:1050)\n\tsock_close (net/socket.c:659 net/socket.c:1421)\n\t__fput (fs/file_table.c:422)\n\t__fput_sync (fs/file_table.c:508)\n\t__se_sys_close (fs/open.c:1559 fs/open.c:1541)\n\t__x64_sys_close (fs/open.c:1541)\n\tx64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)\n\tdo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)\n\tentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\n\tread to 0xffff88867256ddbb of 1 bytes by task 989 on cpu 14:\n\tunix_stream_sendmsg (net/unix/af_unix.c:2273)\n\t__sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:730 net/socket.c:745)\n\t____sys_sendmsg (net/socket.c:2584)\n\t__sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2638 net/socket.c:2724)\n\t__x64_sys_sendmmsg (net/socket.c:2753 net/socket.c:2750 net/socket.c:2750)\n\tx64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)\n\tdo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)\n\tentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\n\tvalue changed: 0x01 -\u0026gt; 0x03\r\n\r\nThe line numbers are related to commit dd5a440a31fa (\u0026quot;Linux 6.9-rc7\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nCommit e1d09c2c2f57 (\u0026quot;af_unix: Fix data races around sk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown.\u0026quot;)\naddressed a comparable issue in the past regarding sk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown.\nHowever, it overlooked resolving this particular data path.\nThis patch only offending unix_stream_sendmsg() function, since the\nother reads seem to be protected by unix_state_lock() as discussed in(CVE-2024-38596)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: Fix reference count leak issues of ax25_dev\r\n\r\nThe ax25_addr_ax25dev() and ax25_dev_device_down() exist a reference\ncount leak issue of the object \u0026quot;ax25_dev\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nMemory leak issue in ax25_addr_ax25dev():\r\n\r\nThe reference count of the object \u0026quot;ax25_dev\u0026quot; can be increased multiple\ntimes in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). This will cause a memory leak.\r\n\r\nMemory leak issues in ax25_dev_device_down():\r\n\r\nThe reference count of ax25_dev is set to 1 in ax25_dev_device_up() and\nthen increase the reference count when ax25_dev is added to ax25_dev_list.\nAs a result, the reference count of ax25_dev is 2. But when the device is\nshutting down. The ax25_dev_device_down() drops the reference count once\nor twice depending on if we goto unlock_put or not, which will cause\nmemory leak.\r\n\r\nAs for the issue of ax25_addr_ax25dev(), it is impossible for one pointer\nto be on a list twice. So add a break in ax25_addr_ax25dev(). As for the\nissue of ax25_dev_device_down(), increase the reference count of ax25_dev\nonce in ax25_dev_device_up() and decrease the reference count of ax25_dev\nafter it is removed from the ax25_dev_list.(CVE-2024-38602)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Actually use devm_add_action_or_reset()\r\n\r\npci_alloc_irq_vectors() allocates an irq vector. When devm_add_action()\nfails, the irq vector is not freed, which leads to a memory leak.\r\n\r\nReplace the devm_add_action with devm_add_action_or_reset to ensure\nthe irq vector can be destroyed when it fails.(CVE-2024-38603)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Check \u0026apos;folio\u0026apos; pointer for NULL\r\n\r\nIt can be NULL if bmap is called.(CVE-2024-38625)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal\r\n\r\nThe removal of the last MAX3100 device triggers the removal of\nthe driver. However, code doesn\u0026apos;t update the respective global\nvariable and after insmod \u2014 rmmod \u2014 insmod cycle the kernel\noopses:\r\n\r\n max3100 spi-PRP0001:01: max3100_probe: adding port 0\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000408\n ...\n RIP: 0010:serial_core_register_port+0xa0/0x840\n ...\n max3100_probe+0x1b6/0x280 [max3100]\n spi_probe+0x8d/0xb0\r\n\r\nUpdate the actual state so next time UART driver will be registered\nagain.\r\n\r\nHugo also noticed, that the error path in the probe also affected\nby having the variable set, and not cleared. Instead of clearing it\nmove the assignment after the successfull uart_register_driver() call.(CVE-2024-38633)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: lights: check return of get_channel_from_mode\r\n\r\nIf channel for the given node is not found we return null from\nget_channel_from_mode. Make sure we validate the return pointer\nbefore using it in two of the missing places.\r\n\r\nThis was originally reported in [0]:\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.\r\n\r\n[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240301190425.120605-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru(CVE-2024-38637)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma-buf/sw-sync: don\u0026apos;t enable IRQ from sync_print_obj()\r\n\r\nSince commit a6aa8fca4d79 (\u0026quot;dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from\nknown context\u0026quot;) by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with\nspin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite\nsync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains\ninconsistent lock state warning.\r\n\r\nUse plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for\nsync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().(CVE-2024-38780)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/9p: fix uninit-value in p9_client_rpc()\r\n\r\nSyzbot with the help of KMSAN reported the following error:\r\n\r\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n trace_9p_client_res include/trace/events/9p.h:146 [inline]\n p9_client_rpc+0x1314/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:754\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n __alloc_pages+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4598\n __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline]\n alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline]\n allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline]\n new_slab+0x2de/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2391\n ___slab_alloc+0x1184/0x33d0 mm/slub.c:3525\n __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3610 [inline]\n __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc+0x6d3/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:3852\n p9_tag_alloc net/9p/client.c:278 [inline]\n p9_client_prepare_req+0x20a/0x1770 net/9p/client.c:641\n p9_client_rpc+0x27e/0x1340 net/9p/client.c:688\n p9_client_create+0x1551/0x1ff0 net/9p/client.c:1031\n v9fs_session_init+0x1b9/0x28e0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:410\n v9fs_mount+0xe2/0x12b0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:122\n legacy_get_tree+0x114/0x290 fs/fs_context.c:662\n vfs_get_tree+0xa7/0x570 fs/super.c:1797\n do_new_mount+0x71f/0x15e0 fs/namespace.c:3352\n path_mount+0x742/0x1f20 fs/namespace.c:3679\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x725/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875\n __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3875\n do_syscall_64+0xd5/0x1f0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nIf p9_check_errors() fails early in p9_client_rpc(), req-\u0026gt;rc.tag\nwill not be properly initialized. However, trace_9p_client_res()\nends up trying to print it out anyway before p9_client_rpc()\nfinishes.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by assigning default values to p9_fcall fields\nsuch as \u0026apos;tag\u0026apos; and (just in case KMSAN unearths something new) \u0026apos;id\u0026apos;\nduring the tag allocation stage.(CVE-2024-39301)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-39362)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid in sanity_check_inode()\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports a kernel bug as below:\r\n\r\nF2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 48b305e4\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600\nRead of size 1 at addr ffff88807a58c76c by task syz-executor280/5076\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 5076 Comm: syz-executor280 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n f2fs_test_bit fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2933 [inline]\n current_nat_addr fs/f2fs/node.h:213 [inline]\n f2fs_get_node_info+0xece/0x1200 fs/f2fs/node.c:600\n f2fs_xattr_fiemap fs/f2fs/data.c:1848 [inline]\n f2fs_fiemap+0x55d/0x1ee0 fs/f2fs/data.c:1925\n ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:220 [inline]\n do_vfs_ioctl+0x1c07/0x2e50 fs/ioctl.c:838\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:902 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x81/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nThe root cause is we missed to do sanity check on i_xattr_nid during\nf2fs_iget(), so that in fiemap() path, current_nat_addr() will access\nnat_bitmap w/ offset from invalid i_xattr_nid, result in triggering\nkasan bug report, fix it.(CVE-2024-39467)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1838",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:18Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T11:07:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1838"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47618"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48733"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48765"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48772"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35879"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35969"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35988"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37353"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38381"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38547"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38552"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38553"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38577"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38582"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38583"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38590"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38602"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38603"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38633"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38637"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38780"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39362"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39467"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47618",
"CVE-2022-48733",
"CVE-2022-48744",
"CVE-2022-48765",
"CVE-2022-48772",
"CVE-2023-52873",
"CVE-2024-35879",
"CVE-2024-35893",
"CVE-2024-35969",
"CVE-2024-35988",
"CVE-2024-35989",
"CVE-2024-36014",
"CVE-2024-36489",
"CVE-2024-37353",
"CVE-2024-37354",
"CVE-2024-38381",
"CVE-2024-38547",
"CVE-2024-38552",
"CVE-2024-38553",
"CVE-2024-38554",
"CVE-2024-38577",
"CVE-2024-38579",
"CVE-2024-38582",
"CVE-2024-38583",
"CVE-2024-38590",
"CVE-2024-38596",
"CVE-2024-38602",
"CVE-2024-38603",
"CVE-2024-38625",
"CVE-2024-38633",
"CVE-2024-38637",
"CVE-2024-38780",
"CVE-2024-39301",
"CVE-2024-39362",
"CVE-2024-39467"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.