CVE-2024-29510 (GCVE-0-2024-29510)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-07-03 00:00 – Updated: 2024-08-19 07:47
VLAI
Summary
Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1 allows memory corruption, and SAFER sandbox bypass, via format string injection with a uniprint device.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- n/a
- CWE-693 - Protection Mechanism Failure
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ghostscript | ghostscript |
Affected:
0 , < 10.03.0
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:ghostscript:ghostscript:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ghostscript:ghostscript:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "ghostscript",
"vendor": "ghostscript",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.03.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-29510",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-10T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-693",
"description": "CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-30T03:55:31.945Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-19T07:47:53.603Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/critical-vulnerability-in-ghostscript-cve-2024-29510"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1 allows memory corruption, and SAFER sandbox bypass, via format string injection with a uniprint device."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-03T18:26:31.334Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662"
},
{
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7"
},
{
"url": "https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-29510",
"datePublished": "2024-07-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-03-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-19T07:47:53.603Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-29510",
"date": "2026-06-08",
"epss": "0.08233",
"percentile": "0.9237"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-29510\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2024-07-03T19:15:03.320\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-28T17:12:24.787\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1 allows memory corruption, and SAFER sandbox bypass, via format string injection with a uniprint device.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Artifex Ghostscript anterior a 10.03.1 permite la corrupci\u00f3n de la memoria y una omisi\u00f3n M\u00c1S SEGURA de la sandbox mediante la inyecci\u00f3n de cadena de formato con un dispositivo uniprint.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":4.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-693\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:artifex:ghostscript:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"10.03.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"62DFF97A-B408-4992-940C-5AEAFCB69A99\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/critical-vulnerability-in-ghostscript-cve-2024-29510\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation/\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/critical-vulnerability-in-ghostscript-cve-2024-29510\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-19T07:47:53.603Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.3, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-29510\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-07-08T13:49:45.881449Z\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:ghostscript:ghostscript:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"ghostscript\", \"product\": \"ghostscript\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"10.03.0\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-693\", \"description\": \"CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-07-08T13:39:57.806Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707662\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/03/7\"}, {\"url\": \"https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-29510-ghostscript-format-string-exploitation/\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1 allows memory corruption, and SAFER sandbox bypass, via format string injection with a uniprint device.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-07-03T18:26:31.334443\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-29510\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-19T07:47:53.603Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-03-19T00:00:00\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-07-03T00:00:00\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…