CVE-2024-23959 (GCVE-0-2024-23959)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-09-28 06:15 – Updated: 2024-10-03 13:44- CWE-121 - Stack-based Buffer Overflow
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-… | x_research-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autel | MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 |
Affected:
1.32.00
|
guessed | |
| autel | maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware |
Affected:
0 , < 1.35
(custom)
cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| autel | maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware |
Affected:
0 , < 1.50
(custom)
cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware:1.50:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware",
"vendor": "autel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.35",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware:1.50:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware",
"vendor": "autel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.50",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-23959",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-03T13:44:18.263961Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-03T13:44:29.019Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50",
"vendor": "Autel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.32.00"
}
]
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2024-01-25T03:47:00.000Z",
"datePublic": "2024-06-21T23:41:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAutel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 charging stations. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the AppChargingControl BLE command. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWas ZDI-CAN-23194\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 charging stations. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the AppChargingControl BLE command. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device.\n\nWas ZDI-CAN-23194"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-28T06:15:15.076Z",
"orgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"shortName": "ASRG"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "ZDI-24-851",
"tags": [
"x_research-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-24-851/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN",
"lang": "en",
"value": "Synacktiv (@Synacktiv)"
},
"title": "Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"assignerShortName": "ASRG",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-23959",
"datePublished": "2024-09-28T06:15:15.076Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-01-25T00:14:40.298Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-03T13:44:29.019Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-23959",
"date": "2026-11-10",
"epss": "0.00817",
"percentile": "0.57441"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50",
"vendor": "Autel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.32.00"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@asrg.io"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware",
"vendor": "autel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.35",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware:1.50:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware",
"vendor": "autel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.50",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware:1.32.00:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8AE968C0-3E5C-4A7A-9687-C6D7208224E7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5B2F9001-71B7-4B39-9114-FC54F4EAE9E7",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 charging stations. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the AppChargingControl BLE command. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device.\n\nWas ZDI-CAN-23194"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo por desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila en el BLE AppChargingControl de Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50. Esta vulnerabilidad permite a los atacantes adyacentes a la red ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario en las instalaciones afectadas de las estaciones de carga Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50. Aunque se requiere autenticaci\u00f3n para explotar esta vulnerabilidad, se puede omitir el mecanismo de autenticaci\u00f3n existente. La falla espec\u00edfica existe en el manejo del comando AppChargingControl BLE. El problema es el resultado de la falta de una validaci\u00f3n adecuada de la longitud de los datos proporcionados por el usuario antes de copiarlos a un b\u00fafer basado en pila de longitud fija. Un atacante puede aprovechar esta vulnerabilidad para ejecutar c\u00f3digo en el contexto del dispositivo. Era ZDI-CAN-23194"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-23959",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:13:57.393",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.0,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.1,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "cve@asrg.io",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.0,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.1,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-23959",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-03T13:44:18.263961Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-28T07:15:03.367",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@asrg.io",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-24-851/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@asrg.io",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-121"
}
],
"source": "cve@asrg.io",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-28T22:14:25+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-23959",
"id": "CVE-2024-23959",
"initial_release_date": "2024-06-21T23:41:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-23959.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_firmware",
"vendor": "autel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.35",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:autel:maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware:1.50:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "maxicharger_ac_elite_business_c50_eu_firmware",
"vendor": "autel",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.50",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-23959",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-03T13:44:18.263961Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-03T13:43:29.932Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50",
"vendor": "Autel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.32.00"
}
]
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2024-01-25T03:47:00.000Z",
"datePublic": "2024-06-21T23:41:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAutel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 charging stations. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the AppChargingControl BLE command. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWas ZDI-CAN-23194\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 charging stations. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the handling of the AppChargingControl BLE command. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device.\n\nWas ZDI-CAN-23194"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-28T06:15:15.076Z",
"orgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"shortName": "ASRG"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "ZDI-24-851",
"tags": [
"x_research-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-24-851/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN",
"lang": "en",
"value": "Synacktiv (@Synacktiv)"
},
"title": "Autel MaxiCharger AC Elite Business C50 BLE AppChargingControl Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"assignerShortName": "ASRG",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-23959",
"datePublished": "2024-09-28T06:15:15.076Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-01-25T00:14:40.298Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-03T13:44:29.019Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.