CVE-2022-26942 (GCVE-0-2022-26942)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-10-19 09:35 – Updated: 2024-08-03 05:18
VLAI
Title
Multiple missing pointer validation checks in trusted execution module in Motorola MTM5000
Summary
The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack pointer validation on arguments passed to trusted execution environment (TEE) modules. Two modules are used, one responsible for KVL key management and the other for TETRA cryptographic functionality. In both modules, an adversary with non-secure supervisor level code execution can exploit the issue in order to gain secure supervisor code execution within the TEE. This constitutes a full break of the TEE module, exposing the device key as well as any TETRA cryptographic keys and the confidential TETRA cryptographic primitives.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2024-07-15 16:23 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-822 - Untrusted Pointer Dereference
Assigner
NCSC-NL CNA under the ENISA root
CNA scorecard – unranked: 1 record in the last 180 days, 10 needed details
References
URL Tags
https://tetraburst.com/ related
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Motorola Mobile Radio Affected: MTM5000
guessed Create a notification for this product.
motorola mtm5000_series_firmware Affected: 0
    cpe:2.3:h:motorola:mtm5000_series_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:h:motorola:mtm5000_series_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "mtm5000_series_firmware",
            "vendor": "motorola",
            "versions": [
              {
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "0"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-26942",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-07-15T16:23:58.876138Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-07-15T16:25:32.089Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:18:38.371Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "TETRA:BURST",
            "tags": [
              "related",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://tetraburst.com/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Mobile Radio",
          "vendor": "Motorola",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "MTM5000"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Midnight Blue"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack pointer validation on arguments passed to trusted execution environment (TEE) modules. Two modules are used, one responsible for KVL key management and the other for TETRA cryptographic functionality. In both modules, an adversary with non-secure supervisor level code execution can exploit the issue in order to gain secure supervisor code execution within the TEE. This constitutes a full break of the TEE module, exposing the device key as well as any TETRA cryptographic keys and the confidential TETRA cryptographic primitives."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.2,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:U/RC:C/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:L/MAC:L/MPR:H/MUI:N/MS:C/MC:H/MI:H/MA:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-822",
              "description": "Untrusted Pointer Dereference",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-07-15T00:27:54.327Z",
        "orgId": "cf4a7ff5-dd38-4ede-a530-ffaa7ea59c39",
        "shortName": "NCSC-NL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "TETRA:BURST",
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://tetraburst.com/"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Multiple missing pointer validation checks in trusted execution module in Motorola MTM5000"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "cf4a7ff5-dd38-4ede-a530-ffaa7ea59c39",
    "assignerShortName": "NCSC-NL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-26942",
    "datePublished": "2023-10-19T09:35:24.386Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-03-11T22:19:24.848Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:18:38.371Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2022-26942",
      "date": "2026-11-10",
      "epss": "0.00208",
      "percentile": "0.1104"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "product": "Mobile Radio",
                "vendor": "Motorola",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "MTM5000"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "cert@ncsc.nl"
          },
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "cpes": [
                  "cpe:2.3:h:motorola:mtm5000_series_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
                ],
                "defaultStatus": "unknown",
                "product": "mtm5000_series_firmware",
                "vendor": "motorola",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0"
          }
        ],
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:motorola:mtm5500_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "BB7C0C44-3660-4B47-A1ED-0BD19EFC5F03",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              },
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:motorola:mtm5500:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "A1A0784B-AE84-4457-A884-5C26EEA8D181",
                    "vulnerable": false
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ],
            "operator": "AND"
          },
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:motorola:mtm5400_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "FF669A29-B983-40F6-BBA9-D9F67E653BEF",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              },
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:motorola:mtm5400:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "03AA5A43-A1B5-4E1C-A844-691607765E30",
                    "vulnerable": false
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ],
            "operator": "AND"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack pointer validation on arguments passed to trusted execution environment (TEE) modules. Two modules are used, one responsible for KVL key management and the other for TETRA cryptographic functionality. In both modules, an adversary with non-secure supervisor level code execution can exploit the issue in order to gain secure supervisor code execution within the TEE. This constitutes a full break of the TEE module, exposing the device key as well as any TETRA cryptographic keys and the confidential TETRA cryptographic primitives."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Los firmwares de la serie Motorola MTM5000 carecen de validaci\u00f3n de puntero en los argumentos pasados a los m\u00f3dulos Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). Se utilizan dos m\u00f3dulos, uno responsable de la gesti\u00f3n de claves KVL y el otro de la funcionalidad criptogr\u00e1fica TETRA. En ambos m\u00f3dulos, un adversario con una ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo de nivel de supervisor no segura puede aprovechar el problema para obtener una ejecuci\u00f3n segura de c\u00f3digo de supervisor dentro del TEE. Esto constituye una ruptura total del m\u00f3dulo TEE, exponiendo la clave del dispositivo, as\u00ed como cualquier clave criptogr\u00e1fica TETRA y las primitivas criptogr\u00e1ficas TETRA confidenciales."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2022-26942",
        "lastModified": "2026-06-17T04:36:12.207",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "LOCAL",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.2,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
                "scope": "CHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 1.5,
              "impactScore": 6.0,
              "source": "cert@ncsc.nl",
              "type": "Secondary"
            },
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "LOCAL",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.2,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
                "scope": "CHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 1.5,
              "impactScore": 6.0,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-26942",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-07-15T16:23:58.876138Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2023-10-19T10:15:09.913",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cert@ncsc.nl",
            "tags": [
              "Technical Description"
            ],
            "url": "https://tetraburst.com/"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Technical Description"
            ],
            "url": "https://tetraburst.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cert@ncsc.nl",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-822"
              }
            ],
            "source": "cert@ncsc.nl",
            "type": "Secondary"
          },
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-763"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-03-27T12:37:39+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2022-26942",
      "id": "CVE-2022-26942",
      "initial_release_date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Multiple missing pointer validation checks in trusted execution module in Motorola MTM5000",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2022/cve-2022-26942.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:18:38.371Z",
              "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
              "shortName": "CVE"
            },
            "references": [
              {
                "name": "TETRA:BURST",
                "tags": [
                  "related",
                  "x_transferred"
                ],
                "url": "https://tetraburst.com/"
              }
            ],
            "title": "CVE Program Container"
          },
          {
            "affected": [
              {
                "cpes": [
                  "cpe:2.3:h:motorola:mtm5000_series_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
                ],
                "defaultStatus": "unknown",
                "product": "mtm5000_series_firmware",
                "vendor": "motorola",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2022-26942",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "total"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2024-07-15T16:23:58.876138Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2024-07-15T16:25:21.416Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "product": "Mobile Radio",
              "vendor": "Motorola",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "MTM5000"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "finder",
              "value": "Midnight Blue"
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack pointer validation on arguments passed to trusted execution environment (TEE) modules. Two modules are used, one responsible for KVL key management and the other for TETRA cryptographic functionality. In both modules, an adversary with non-secure supervisor level code execution can exploit the issue in order to gain secure supervisor code execution within the TEE. This constitutes a full break of the TEE module, exposing the device key as well as any TETRA cryptographic keys and the confidential TETRA cryptographic primitives."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "LOCAL",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.2,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
                "scope": "CHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:U/RC:C/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:L/MAC:L/MPR:H/MUI:N/MS:C/MC:H/MI:H/MA:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-822",
                  "description": "Untrusted Pointer Dereference",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2024-07-15T00:27:54.327Z",
            "orgId": "cf4a7ff5-dd38-4ede-a530-ffaa7ea59c39",
            "shortName": "NCSC-NL"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "TETRA:BURST",
              "tags": [
                "related"
              ],
              "url": "https://tetraburst.com/"
            }
          ],
          "title": "Multiple missing pointer validation checks in trusted execution module in Motorola MTM5000"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "cf4a7ff5-dd38-4ede-a530-ffaa7ea59c39",
        "assignerShortName": "NCSC-NL",
        "cveId": "CVE-2022-26942",
        "datePublished": "2023-10-19T09:35:24.386Z",
        "dateReserved": "2022-03-11T22:19:24.848Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T05:18:38.371Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.