CVE-2022-0329 (GCVE-0-2022-0329)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-01-21 10:30 – Updated: 2022-02-02 20:10DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-02-02T20:10:18.000Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntrdev"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntrdev",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-0329",
"datePublished": "2022-01-21T10:30:10.000Z",
"dateRejected": "2022-02-02T20:10:18.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-01-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2022-02-02T20:10:18.000Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-0329",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T03:41:12.753",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2022-01-21T11:15:07.680",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@huntr.dev",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.