CVE-2021-3521 (GCVE-0-2021-3521)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-08-22 00:00 – Updated: 2024-08-03 17:01
VLAI
Summary
There is a flaw in RPM's signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a "binding signature." RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • CWE-347 - - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a RPM Affected: Fixed in rpm-4.18.0-beta1, rpm-4.18.0-alpha2, rpm-4.18.0-alpha1 .
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T17:01:07.975Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-202210-22",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RPM",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "Fixed in rpm-4.18.0-beta1, rpm-4.18.0-alpha2, rpm-4.18.0-alpha1 ."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "There is a flaw in RPM\u0027s signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a \"binding signature.\" RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-347",
              "description": "CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-10-31T00:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8"
        },
        {
          "name": "GLSA-202210-22",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2021-3521",
    "datePublished": "2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2021-04-28T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T17:01:07.975Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2021-3521",
      "date": "2026-05-30",
      "epss": "0.00019",
      "percentile": "0.05386"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-3521\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2022-08-22T15:15:13.473\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:21:45.260\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"There is a flaw in RPM\u0027s signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a \\\"binding signature.\\\" RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se presenta un fallo en la funcionalidad de firma de RPM. Las subclaves OpenPGP se asocian a una clave primaria por medio de una \\\"firma vinculante\\\". RPM no comprueba la firma vinculante de las subclaves antes de importarlas. Si un atacante es capaz de a\u00f1adir o hacer ingenier\u00eda social para que otra parte a\u00f1ada una subclave maliciosa a una clave p\u00fablica leg\u00edtima, RPM podr\u00eda confiar err\u00f3neamente en una firma maliciosa. El mayor impacto de este fallo es la integridad de los datos. Para explotar este fallo, un atacante debe comprometer un repositorio de RPM o convencer a un administrador para que instale un RPM o una clave p\u00fablica que no sean confiables. Es recomendado encarecidamente usar s\u00f3lo RPMs y claves p\u00fablicas de fuentes confiables.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.0,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.17.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1074C3F6-BFE3-45EC-B03B-F39E7DC4E323\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.