CVE-2020-1744 (GCVE-0-2020-1744)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-03-24 00:00 – Updated: 2024-08-04 06:46
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
A flaw was found in keycloak before version 9.0.1. When configuring an Conditional OTP Authentication Flow as a post login flow of an IDP, the failure login events for OTP are not being sent to the brute force protection event queue. So BruteForceProtector does not handle this events.
Severity
5.6 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.879Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1744"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1744"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "keycloak",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "all keycloak versions prior to 9.0.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in keycloak before version 9.0.1. When configuring an Conditional OTP Authentication Flow as a post login flow of an IDP, the failure login events for OTP are not being sent to the brute force protection event queue. So BruteForceProtector does not handle this events."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-755",
"description": "CWE-755",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-10-07T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1744"
},
{
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1744"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-1744",
"datePublished": "2020-03-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2019-11-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.879Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2020-1744",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.0112",
"percentile": "0.66631"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "23787EE3-4659-4D20-8473-C7237168FDB9",
"versionEndExcluding": "9.0.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in keycloak before version 9.0.1. When configuring an Conditional OTP Authentication Flow as a post login flow of an IDP, the failure login events for OTP are not being sent to the brute force protection event queue. So BruteForceProtector does not handle this events."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un fallo en keycloak versiones anteriores a la versi\u00f3n 9.0.1. Cuando se configura un Conditional OTP Authentication Flow como un flujo posterior al inicio de sesi\u00f3n de un IDP, los eventos de inicio de sesi\u00f3n fallidos para OTP no son enviados hacia la cola de eventos de protecci\u00f3n de fuerza bruta. Entonces BruteForceProtector no maneja estos eventos."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2020-1744",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:11:17.480",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2020-03-24T14:15:13.293",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1744"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1744"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1744"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1744"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-755"
}
],
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-755"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-11-07T13:34:30+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2020-1744",
"id": "CVE-2020-1744",
"initial_release_date": "2020-03-23T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "12",
"product_status:known_affected": "2",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "keycloak: failedLogin Event not sent to BruteForceProtector when using Post Login Flow with Conditional-OTP",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2020/cve-2020-1744.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.