CVE-2019-0825 (GCVE-0-2019-0825)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-04-09 20:16 – Updated: 2024-08-04 17:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0823, CVE-2019-0824, CVE-2019-0826, CVE-2019-0827.
Severity
7.8 (High)
CWE
- Remote Code Execution
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Office |
Affected:
2010 Service Pack 2 (32-bit editions)
Affected: 2010 Service Pack 2 (64-bit editions) Affected: 2016 (32-bit edition) Affected: 2016 (64-bit edition) Affected: 2019 for 32-bit editions Affected: 2019 for 64-bit editions |
guessed | |
| Microsoft | Office 365 ProPlus |
Affected:
32-bit Systems
Affected: 64-bit Systems |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T17:58:59.498Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0825"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Microsoft Office",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2010 Service Pack 2 (32-bit editions)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2010 Service Pack 2 (64-bit editions)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2016 (32-bit edition)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2016 (64-bit edition)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2019 for 32-bit editions"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2019 for 64-bit editions"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Office 365 ProPlus",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "32-bit Systems"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "64-bit Systems"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka \u0027Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0823, CVE-2019-0824, CVE-2019-0826, CVE-2019-0827."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Remote Code Execution",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2019-04-09T20:16:25.000Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0825"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secure@microsoft.com",
"ID": "CVE-2019-0825",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Microsoft Office",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "2010 Service Pack 2 (32-bit editions)"
},
{
"version_value": "2010 Service Pack 2 (64-bit editions)"
},
{
"version_value": "2016 (32-bit edition)"
},
{
"version_value": "2016 (64-bit edition)"
},
{
"version_value": "2019 for 32-bit editions"
},
{
"version_value": "2019 for 64-bit editions"
}
]
}
},
{
"product_name": "Office 365 ProPlus",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "32-bit Systems"
},
{
"version_value": "64-bit Systems"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Microsoft"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka \u0027Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0823, CVE-2019-0824, CVE-2019-0826, CVE-2019-0827."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Remote Code Execution"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0825",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0825"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2019-0825",
"datePublished": "2019-04-09T20:16:25.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2018-11-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T17:58:59.498Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2019-0825",
"date": "2026-11-07",
"epss": "0.10505",
"percentile": "0.95791"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:office:2010:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "081DE1E3-4622-4C32-8B9C-9AEC1CD20638",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:office:2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0B3B0BC-C7C6-4687-AD72-DCA29FF9AE3A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:office:2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FF177984-A906-43FA-BF60-298133FBBD6B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:office_365_proplus:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "94A9F645-7A3A-44E1-B9E6-14E128746785",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka \u0027Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0823, CVE-2019-0824, CVE-2019-0826, CVE-2019-0827."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se presenta una vulnerabilidad de ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo remota cuando el motor de conectividad de Microsoft Office Access maneja de manera inapropiada los objetos en la memoria, tambi\u00e9n se conoce como \"Microsoft Office Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\". Este ID de CVE es diferente de los CVE-2019-0823, CVE-2019-0824, CVE-2019-0826, CVE-2019-0827."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2019-0825",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:17:20.770",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2019-04-09T21:29:01.473",
"references": [
{
"source": "secure@microsoft.com",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0825"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0825"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secure@microsoft.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.