CVE-2017-15090 (GCVE-0-2017-15090)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2018-01-23 15:00 – Updated: 2024-09-16 18:38
VLAI
Summary
An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CWE
Assigner
redhat CNA under the redhat root
CNA scorecard B 82/100 over 1037 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
PowerDNS PowerDNS Affected: from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2017-11-27 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:50:14.915Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "101982",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "PowerDNS",
          "vendor": "PowerDNS",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-11-27T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-347",
              "description": "CWE-347",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2018-01-24T10:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "101982",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-11-27T00:00:00",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-15090",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "PowerDNS",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "PowerDNS"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-347"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "101982",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2017-15090",
    "datePublished": "2018-01-23T15:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2017-10-08T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T18:38:21.212Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2017-15090",
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "epss": "0.00709",
      "percentile": "0.52912"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:recursor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "94094CC8-C228-40FF-BA81-FD93082D99A2",
                    "versionEndIncluding": "4.0.6",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Se ha descubierto un problema en el componente de validaci\u00f3n DNSSEC de PowerDNS Recursor, desde la versi\u00f3n 4.0.0 hasta la versi\u00f3n 4.0.6, tambi\u00e9n incluida, en el que las firmas podr\u00edan haber sido aceptadas como v\u00e1lidas incluso aunque los datos firmados no estuvieran en el territorio del DNSKEY empleado para firmarlo. Esto permite que un atacante en posici\u00f3n Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) altere el contenido de los registros enviando una firma v\u00e1lida para los registros manipulados."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2017-15090",
        "lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:14:03.050",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 4.3,
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
              "impactScore": 2.9,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV30": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 5.9,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
              "impactScore": 3.6,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2018-01-23T15:29:00.213",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory",
              "VDB Entry"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
          },
          {
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Third Party Advisory",
              "VDB Entry"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-347"
              }
            ],
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          },
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-347"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2025-11-21T16:10:40+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2017-15090",
      "id": "CVE-2017-15090",
      "initial_release_date": "2017-11-27T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "pdns-recursor: 4.0.7 release fixing security issues",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2017/cve-2017-15090.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.