CVE-2017-11385 (GCVE-0-2017-11385)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-08-02 21:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 18:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
SQL Injection in Trend Micro Control Manager 6.0 causes Remote Code Execution when executing opcode 0x6b1b due to lack of proper user input validation in cmdHandlerStatusMonitor.dll. Formerly ZDI-CAN-4545.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100078 | vdb-entryx_refsource_BID |
| http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039049 | vdb-entryx_refsource_SECTRACK |
| https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722 | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495 | x_refsource_MISC |
Date Public
2017-07-13 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:05:30.596Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "100078",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100078"
},
{
"name": "1039049",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039049"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SQL Injection in Trend Micro Control Manager 6.0 causes Remote Code Execution when executing opcode 0x6b1b due to lack of proper user input validation in cmdHandlerStatusMonitor.dll. Formerly ZDI-CAN-4545."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-08-05T09:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "7f7bd7df-cffe-4fdb-ab6d-859363b89272",
"shortName": "trendmicro"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "100078",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100078"
},
{
"name": "1039049",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039049"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@trendmicro.com",
"ID": "CVE-2017-11385",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "SQL Injection in Trend Micro Control Manager 6.0 causes Remote Code Execution when executing opcode 0x6b1b due to lack of proper user input validation in cmdHandlerStatusMonitor.dll. Formerly ZDI-CAN-4545."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "100078",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100078"
},
{
"name": "1039049",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039049"
},
{
"name": "https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722"
},
{
"name": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7f7bd7df-cffe-4fdb-ab6d-859363b89272",
"assignerShortName": "trendmicro",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-11385",
"datePublished": "2017-08-02T21:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-07-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:05:30.596Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2017-11385",
"date": "2026-07-23",
"epss": "0.3874",
"percentile": "0.98433"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-11385\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@trendmicro.com\",\"published\":\"2017-08-02T21:29:00.260\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-13T00:24:29.033\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"SQL Injection in Trend Micro Control Manager 6.0 causes Remote Code Execution when executing opcode 0x6b1b due to lack of proper user input validation in cmdHandlerStatusMonitor.dll. Formerly ZDI-CAN-4545.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n SQL en Trend Micro Control Manager 6.0 permite la ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo remoto cuando se ejecuta opcode 0x6b1b por no haber una validaci\u00f3n de los datos de entrada del usuario correcta en cmdHandlerStatusMonitor.dll. Anteriormente esta vulnerabilidad ten\u00eda el c\u00f3digo ZDI-CAN-4545.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-89\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:trendmicro:control_manager:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2F7E3779-69E4-46AB-94E3-4A81E35A5194\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100078\",\"source\":\"security@trendmicro.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039049\",\"source\":\"security@trendmicro.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495\",\"source\":\"security@trendmicro.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722\",\"source\":\"security@trendmicro.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100078\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039049\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-495\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117722\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…