CVE-2016-1929 (GCVE-0-2016-1929)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2016-01-20 16:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 23:10
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
The XS engine in SAP HANA allows remote attackers to spoof log entries in trace files and consequently cause a denial of service (disk consumption and process crash) via a crafted HTTP request, related to an unspecified debug function, aka SAP Security Note 2241978.
Severity
9.3 (Critical)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security… | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/59 | mailing-listx_refsource_FULLDISC |
Date Public
2016-01-12 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T23:10:40.439Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-hana-log-injection-and-no-size-restriction/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security-notes-january-2016-review/"
},
{
"name": "20160415 [ERPSCAN-16-002] SAP HANA - log injection and no size restriction",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/59"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2016-01-12T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The XS engine in SAP HANA allows remote attackers to spoof log entries in trace files and consequently cause a denial of service (disk consumption and process crash) via a crafted HTTP request, related to an unspecified debug function, aka SAP Security Note 2241978."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-12-10T17:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-hana-log-injection-and-no-size-restriction/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security-notes-january-2016-review/"
},
{
"name": "20160415 [ERPSCAN-16-002] SAP HANA - log injection and no size restriction",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/59"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2016-1929",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The XS engine in SAP HANA allows remote attackers to spoof log entries in trace files and consequently cause a denial of service (disk consumption and process crash) via a crafted HTTP request, related to an unspecified debug function, aka SAP Security Note 2241978."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-hana-log-injection-and-no-size-restriction/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-hana-log-injection-and-no-size-restriction/"
},
{
"name": "https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security-notes-january-2016-review/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security-notes-january-2016-review/"
},
{
"name": "20160415 [ERPSCAN-16-002] SAP HANA - log injection and no size restriction",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/59"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-1929",
"datePublished": "2016-01-20T16:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2016-01-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T23:10:40.439Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2016-1929",
"date": "2026-07-18",
"epss": "0.02263",
"percentile": "0.81044"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-1929\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2016-01-20T16:59:07.817\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-06T22:30:45.220\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The XS engine in SAP HANA allows remote attackers to spoof log entries in trace files and consequently cause a denial of service (disk consumption and process crash) via a crafted HTTP request, related to an unspecified debug function, aka SAP Security Note 2241978.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El motor XS en SAP HANA permite a atacantes remotos suplantar entradas de archivos de registro de seguimiento y consecuentemente provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (consumo de disco y ca\u00edda del proceso) a trav\u00e9s de una petici\u00f3n HTTP manipulada, relacionado con una funci\u00f3n de depuraci\u00f3n no especificada, tambi\u00e9n conocido como SAP Security Note 2241978.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":4.7}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:C\",\"baseScore\":8.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":7.8,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:sap:hana:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"64E722FC-5FEF-4EE2-9A88-5CD4938283F1\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/59\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-hana-log-injection-and-no-size-restriction/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security-notes-january-2016-review/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/59\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-16-002-sap-hana-log-injection-and-no-size-restriction/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://erpscan.io/press-center/blog/sap-security-notes-january-2016-review/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…