CVE-2013-6078 (GCVE-0-2013-6078)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2014-06-17 15:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 17:29- n/a
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/r… | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-re… | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-usin… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T17:29:42.965Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2013-09-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The default configuration of EMC RSA BSAFE Toolkits and RSA Data Protection Manager (DPM) 20130918 uses the Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generation (Dual_EC_DRBG) algorithm, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging unspecified \"security concerns,\" aka the ESA-2013-068 issue. NOTE: this issue has been SPLIT from CVE-2007-6755 because the vendor announcement did not state a specific technical rationale for a change in the algorithm; thus, CVE cannot reach a conclusion that a CVE-2007-6755 concern was the reason, or one of the reasons, for this change."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2014-06-17T14:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "43595867-4340-4103-b7a2-9a5208d29a85",
"shortName": "oracle"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"ID": "CVE-2013-6078",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The default configuration of EMC RSA BSAFE Toolkits and RSA Data Protection Manager (DPM) 20130918 uses the Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generation (Dual_EC_DRBG) algorithm, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging unspecified \"security concerns,\" aka the ESA-2013-068 issue. NOTE: this issue has been SPLIT from CVE-2007-6755 because the vendor announcement did not state a specific technical rationale for a change in the algorithm; thus, CVE cannot reach a conclusion that a CVE-2007-6755 concern was the reason, or one of the reasons, for this change."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/"
},
{
"name": "http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html"
},
{
"name": "http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect"
},
{
"name": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "43595867-4340-4103-b7a2-9a5208d29a85",
"assignerShortName": "oracle",
"cveId": "CVE-2013-6078",
"datePublished": "2014-06-17T15:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2013-10-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T17:29:42.965Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2013-6078",
"date": "2026-11-09",
"epss": "0.01011",
"percentile": "0.63393"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:rsa_bsafe_toolkits:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D4F2CC09-7CC4-4580-B175-5A4D99762388",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:rsa_data_protection_manager:20130918:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "76E4EBB4-A378-45C4-A521-CDAE6A63D1F5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The default configuration of EMC RSA BSAFE Toolkits and RSA Data Protection Manager (DPM) 20130918 uses the Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generation (Dual_EC_DRBG) algorithm, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging unspecified \"security concerns,\" aka the ESA-2013-068 issue. NOTE: this issue has been SPLIT from CVE-2007-6755 because the vendor announcement did not state a specific technical rationale for a change in the algorithm; thus, CVE cannot reach a conclusion that a CVE-2007-6755 concern was the reason, or one of the reasons, for this change."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto de EMC RSA BSAFE Toolkits y RSA Data Protection Manager (DPM) 20130918 utiliza el algoritmo Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generation (Dual_EC_DRBG), lo que facilita a atacantes dependientes de contexto anular mecanismos de protecci\u00f3n criptogr\u00e1fica mediante el aprovechamiento de \u0027temas de seguridad\u0027 no especificados, tambi\u00e9n conocido como el problema ESA-2013-068. NOTA: este problema ha sido dividido (SPLIT) de CVE-2007-6755 porque la declaraci\u00f3n del proveedor no ofreci\u00f3 un razonamiento t\u00e9cnico especifico para un cambio en el algoritmo; por lo tanto, CVE no puede llegar a una conclusi\u00f3n que un tema de CVE-2007-6755 fue la raz\u00f3n, o una de las razones, para este cambio."
}
],
"evaluatorComment": "As with CVE-2007-6755 this vulnerability has been scored with the assumption the relationship between P and Q is known to the attacker. Please see CVE-2007-6755 [link: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2007-6755] more information.",
"id": "CVE-2013-6078",
"lastModified": "2026-05-06T22:30:45.220",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2014-06-17T15:55:05.550",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/"
},
{
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"url": "http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"url": "http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/"
},
{
"source": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"url": "http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/stop-using-nsa-influence-code-in-our-product-rsa-tells-customers/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/09/rsa-warns-developers-against-its-own.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-332655/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://threatpost.com/in-wake-of-latest-crypto-revelations-everything-is-suspect"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert_us@oracle.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.