CVE-2013-1634 (GCVE-0-2013-1634)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-02-13 21:15 – Updated: 2024-08-06 15:04
VLAI
Summary
A denial of service vulnerability exists in some motherboard implementations of Intel e1000e/82574L network controller devices through 2013-02-06 where the device can be brought into a non-processing state when parsing 32 hex, 33 hex, or 34 hex byte values at the 0x47f offset. NOTE: A followup statement from Intel suggests that the root cause of this issue was an incorrectly configured EEPROM image.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028089 | vdb-entryx_refsource_SECTRACK |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/4 | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/3 | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
| https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilit… | vdb-entryx_refsource_XF |
| http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https:/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T15:04:49.568Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "1028089",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028089"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130212 Re: Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/4"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130212 Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/3"
},
{
"name": "85069",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85069"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A denial of service vulnerability exists in some motherboard implementations of Intel e1000e/82574L network controller devices through 2013-02-06 where the device can be brought into a non-processing state when parsing 32 hex, 33 hex, or 34 hex byte values at the 0x47f offset. NOTE: A followup statement from Intel suggests that the root cause of this issue was an incorrectly configured EEPROM image."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-02-13T21:15:37.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "1028089",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028089"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130212 Re: Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/4"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130212 Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/3"
},
{
"name": "85069",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85069"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2013-1634",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "A denial of service vulnerability exists in some motherboard implementations of Intel e1000e/82574L network controller devices through 2013-02-06 where the device can be brought into a non-processing state when parsing 32 hex, 33 hex, or 34 hex byte values at the 0x47f offset. NOTE: A followup statement from Intel suggests that the root cause of this issue was an incorrectly configured EEPROM image."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "1028089",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028089"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130212 Re: Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/4"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20130212 Re: e1000e/82574L hardware erratum",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/3"
},
{
"name": "85069",
"refsource": "XF",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85069"
},
{
"name": "http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement"
},
{
"name": "http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2013-1634",
"datePublished": "2020-02-13T21:15:37.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2013-02-07T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T15:04:49.568Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2013-1634",
"date": "2026-06-20",
"epss": "0.02488",
"percentile": "0.82551"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2013-1634\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2020-02-13T22:15:11.033\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:50:02.400\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A denial of service vulnerability exists in some motherboard implementations of Intel e1000e/82574L network controller devices through 2013-02-06 where the device can be brought into a non-processing state when parsing 32 hex, 33 hex, or 34 hex byte values at the 0x47f offset. NOTE: A followup statement from Intel suggests that the root cause of this issue was an incorrectly configured EEPROM image.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se presenta una vulnerabilidad de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio en algunas implementaciones de tarjetas madre de dispositivos controladores de red Intel e1000e/82574L hasta el 06-02-2013, donde el dispositivo puede pasar a un estado sin procesamiento al analizar valores de 32 hex, 33 hex o 34 hex byte en el desplazamiento 0x47f. NOTA: Una declaraci\u00f3n de seguimiento de Intel sugiere que la causa ra\u00edz de este problema fue una imagen EEPROM configurada incorrectamente.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-665\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:intel:82574l_controller_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2013-02-06\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4C23F61B-6C4D-4A92-A79B-FAFED063CFD3\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:intel:82574l_controller:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2406CD17-5DF7-4C65-9524-FCDA61CC1444\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/3\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/4\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028089\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85069\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://web.archive.org/web/20131205055429/https://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/12/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028089\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85069\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…