CVE-2012-3372 (GCVE-0-2012-3372)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2012-07-09 10:00 – Updated: 2025-01-27 21:07 Disputed
VLAI?
Summary
The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance "does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.
Severity ?
7.4 (High)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
},
{
"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2012-3372",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
},
{
"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
}
],
"tags": [
"disputed"
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2012-3372",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\""
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
},
{
"name": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
},
{
"name": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
},
{
"name": "20120703 Cyberoam advisory",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
},
{
"name": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2012-3372",
"datePublished": "2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2012-3372",
"date": "2026-05-03",
"epss": "0.00084",
"percentile": "0.24339"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-3372\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-07-09T10:20:44.417\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-29T01:13:23.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto del dispositivo Cyberoam UTM utiliza la misma clave privada en distintas instalaciones de clientes, lo que que facilita a atacantes MITM (man-in-the-Middle u hombre-en-medio) a espiar servidores SSL aprovechando la presencia del certificado Cyberoam_SSL_CA en una lista de confianza de autoridades emisoras de certificados ra\u00edz. NOTA: el vendedor se opone a la importancia de esta cuesti\u00f3n, porque el dispositivo \\\"no permite la importaci\u00f3n o exportaci\u00f3n de la mencionada clave privada\\\"\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-310\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"product\": \"n/a\", \"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"description\": \"n/a\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"dateUpdated\": \"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z\", \"orgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"shortName\": \"redhat\"}, \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\"}, {\"name\": \"20120703 Cyberoam advisory\", \"tags\": [\"mailing-list\", \"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ\"], \"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\"}], \"tags\": [\"disputed\"], \"x_legacyV4Record\": {\"CVE_data_meta\": {\"ASSIGNER\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"ID\": \"CVE-2012-3372\", \"STATE\": \"PUBLIC\"}, \"affects\": {\"vendor\": {\"vendor_data\": [{\"product\": {\"product_data\": [{\"product_name\": \"n/a\", \"version\": {\"version_data\": [{\"version_value\": \"n/a\"}]}}]}, \"vendor_name\": \"n/a\"}]}}, \"data_format\": \"MITRE\", \"data_type\": \"CVE\", \"data_version\": \"4.0\", \"description\": {\"description_data\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \\\"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\\\"\"}]}, \"problemtype\": {\"problemtype_data\": [{\"description\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"n/a\"}]}]}, \"references\": {\"reference_data\": [{\"name\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\"}, {\"name\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\"}, {\"name\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\"}, {\"name\": \"20120703 Cyberoam advisory\", \"refsource\": \"BUGTRAQ\", \"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\"}, {\"name\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\", \"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\"}]}}}, \"adp\": [{\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z\"}, \"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372\"}, {\"name\": \"20120703 Cyberoam advisory\", \"tags\": [\"mailing-list\", \"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html\"}, {\"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"], \"url\": \"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/\"}]}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.4, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2012-3372\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"description\": \"CWE-noinfo Not enough information\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-21T19:32:09.694Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"assignerOrgId\": \"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749\", \"assignerShortName\": \"redhat\", \"cveId\": \"CVE-2012-3372\", \"datePublished\": \"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…