FKIE_CVE-2012-3372

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-07-09 10:20 - Updated: 2026-04-29 01:13
Summary
The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance "does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.
Impacted products

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [
    {
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "** EN DISPUTA ** La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto del dispositivo Cyberoam UTM utiliza la misma clave privada en distintas instalaciones de clientes, lo que que facilita a atacantes MITM (man-in-the-Middle u hombre-en-medio) a espiar servidores SSL aprovechando la presencia del certificado Cyberoam_SSL_CA en una lista de confianza de autoridades emisoras de certificados ra\u00edz. NOTA: el vendedor se opone a la importancia de esta cuesti\u00f3n, porque el dispositivo \"no permite la importaci\u00f3n o exportaci\u00f3n de la mencionada clave privada\""
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-3372",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-29T01:13:23.040",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 4.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.4,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2012-07-09T10:20:44.417",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-310"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…