FKIE_CVE-2012-3372

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-07-09 10:20 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:43
Severity
7.4 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance "does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttp://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html
secalert@redhat.comhttp://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/
secalert@redhat.comhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/
secalert@redhat.comhttps://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372
secalert@redhat.comhttps://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
elitecore cyberoam_unified_threat_management *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [
    {
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "** EN DISPUTA ** La configuraci\u00f3n por defecto del dispositivo Cyberoam UTM utiliza la misma clave privada en distintas instalaciones de clientes, lo que que facilita a atacantes MITM (man-in-the-Middle u hombre-en-medio) a espiar servidores SSL aprovechando la presencia del certificado Cyberoam_SSL_CA en una lista de confianza de autoridades emisoras de certificados ra\u00edz. NOTA: el vendedor se opone a la importancia de esta cuesti\u00f3n, porque el dispositivo \"no permite la importaci\u00f3n o exportaci\u00f3n de la mencionada clave privada\""
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-3372",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:43:05.787",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 4.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.4,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2012-3372",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2012-07-09T10:20:44.417",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-310"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.