CVE-2011-4092 (GCVE-0-2011-4092)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2014-02-10 17:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 23:53
VLAI
Summary
obby (aka libobby) does not verify SSL server certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary certificate.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750636 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/30/5 | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/1 | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
Date Public
2011-10-30 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T23:53:32.651Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750636"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20111030 Re: CVE request: 3 flaws in libobby and libnet6",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/30/5"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20111031 Re: CVE request: 3 flaws in libobby and libnet6",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2011-10-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "obby (aka libobby) does not verify SSL server certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary certificate."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2014-02-10T16:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750636"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20111030 Re: CVE request: 3 flaws in libobby and libnet6",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/30/5"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20111031 Re: CVE request: 3 flaws in libobby and libnet6",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/1"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2011-4092",
"datePublished": "2014-02-10T17:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2011-10-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T23:53:32.651Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2011-4092",
"date": "2026-06-03",
"epss": "0.00147",
"percentile": "0.34883"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2011-4092\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2014-02-10T18:15:09.107\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-29T01:13:23.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"obby (aka libobby) does not verify SSL server certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary certificate.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"obby (tambi\u00e9n conocido como libobby) no verifica certificados de servidor SSL, lo que permite a atacantes remotos falsificar servidores a trav\u00e9s de un certificado arbitrario.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ubuntu_developers:obby:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"473891A2-7846-4F5D-B23F-F809B7E2A17D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/30/5\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750636\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/30/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/10/31/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750636\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…