CVE-2000-1022 (GCVE-0-2000-1022)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2001-01-22 05:00 – Updated: 2024-08-08 05:37
VLAI
Summary
The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Date Public
2000-09-19 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T05:37:32.356Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "1698",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698"
          },
          {
            "name": "cisco-pix-smtp-filtering(5277)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277"
          },
          {
            "name": "20001005 Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Mailguard Vulnerability",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_CISCO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml"
          },
          {
            "name": "20000920 Re: Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack) - Version 4.2(1) not exploitable",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20000919 Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack)",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2000-09-19T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2005-11-02T10:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "1698",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698"
        },
        {
          "name": "cisco-pix-smtp-filtering(5277)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277"
        },
        {
          "name": "20001005 Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Mailguard Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_CISCO"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml"
        },
        {
          "name": "20000920 Re: Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack) - Version 4.2(1) not exploitable",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "20000919 Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack)",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2000-1022",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "1698",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698"
            },
            {
              "name": "cisco-pix-smtp-filtering(5277)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277"
            },
            {
              "name": "20001005 Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Mailguard Vulnerability",
              "refsource": "CISCO",
              "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml"
            },
            {
              "name": "20000920 Re: Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack) - Version 4.2(1) not exploitable",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20000919 Cisco PIX Firewall (smtp content filtering hack)",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2000-1022",
    "datePublished": "2001-01-22T05:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2000-11-24T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T05:37:32.356Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2000-1022",
      "date": "2026-07-23",
      "epss": "0.07102",
      "percentile": "0.93569"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2000-1022\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2000-12-11T05:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-16T00:27:16.627\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The mailguard feature in Cisco Secure PIX Firewall 5.2(2) and earlier does not properly restrict access to SMTP commands, which allows remote attackers to execute restricted commands by sending a DATA command before sending the restricted commands.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":true,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(1\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B1C4F7D5-DCD0-409C-86BF-A96A5253DF64\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(2\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8198D129-76D0-4983-BFC4-8EC724FE1B6A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.2\\\\(5\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6BEECFAA-9DD5-4950-B9F1-CF8582225314\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"49566EAC-05AF-4880-8000-351AF538E4CC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:4.4\\\\(4\\\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"118CBF59-DAD8-468E-B279-F6359E4624F1\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7AA2E425-904C-4070-8F5F-B81BCF3147F6\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"604CF950-5D4B-4DC6-819E-0528B22CB05C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:cisco:pix_firewall_software:5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"999A0969-60EB-4B2E-A274-9F05D9F840E5\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0222.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-09/0241.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-pub.shtml\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1698\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5277\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.