CWE-829
Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
The product imports, requires, or includes executable functionality (such as a library) from a source that is outside of the intended control sphere.
CVE-2025-34074 (GCVE-0-2025-34074)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-02 19:26 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:43
VLAI
Title
Lucee Admin Interface Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Scheduled Job File Write
Summary
An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Lucee’s administrative interface due to insecure design in the scheduled task functionality. An administrator with access to /lucee/admin/web.cfm can configure a scheduled job to retrieve a remote .cfm file from an attacker-controlled server, which is written to the Lucee webroot and executed with the privileges of the Lucee service account. Because Lucee does not enforce integrity checks, path restrictions, or execution controls for scheduled task fetches, this feature can be abused to achieve arbitrary code execution. This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-55354.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasplo… | exploit |
| https://github.com/lucee/Lucee | product |
| https://vulncheck.com/advisories/lucee-admin-inte… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucee Association Switzerland | Lucee |
Affected:
5.0
Affected: 6.0 Affected: All versions with scheduled task functionality |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-34074",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-03T13:16:58.679999Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-03T13:17:11.697Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/multi/http/lucee_scheduled_job.rb"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Lucee Administrative Web Interface \u2014 Scheduled Task Handler",
"file (used during job update via action=services.schedule\u0026action2=edit)"
],
"product": "Lucee",
"vendor": "Lucee Association Switzerland",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions with scheduled task functionality"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Alexander Philiotis of SynerComm"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn authenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Lucee\u2019s administrative interface due to insecure design in the scheduled task functionality. An administrator with access to \u003ccode\u003e/lucee/admin/web.cfm\u003c/code\u003e can configure a scheduled job to retrieve a remote \u003ccode\u003e.cfm\u003c/code\u003e file from an attacker-controlled server, which is written to the Lucee webroot and executed with the privileges of the Lucee service account. Because Lucee does not enforce integrity checks, path restrictions, or execution controls for scheduled task fetches, this feature can be abused to achieve arbitrary code execution. This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-55354.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Lucee\u2019s administrative interface due to insecure design in the scheduled task functionality. An administrator with access to /lucee/admin/web.cfm can configure a scheduled job to retrieve a remote .cfm file from an attacker-controlled server, which is written to the Lucee webroot and executed with the privileges of the Lucee service account. Because Lucee does not enforce integrity checks, path restrictions, or execution controls for scheduled task fetches, this feature can be abused to achieve arbitrary code execution. This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-55354."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-137",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-137 Parameter Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T15:43:31.978Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/multi/http/lucee_scheduled_job.rb"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lucee/Lucee"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vulncheck.com/advisories/lucee-admin-interface-rce"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Lucee Admin Interface Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Scheduled Job File Write",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-34074",
"datePublished": "2025-07-02T19:26:31.382Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-15T19:15:22.550Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T15:43:31.978Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-36355 (GCVE-0-2025-36355)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-06 16:52 – Updated: 2025-10-06 19:59
VLAI
Title
IBM Security Verify Access code execution
Summary
IBM Security Verify Access and IBM Security Verify Access Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.9.0 and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.1.0
could allow a locally authenticated user to execute malicious scripts from outside of its control sphere.
Severity
8.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7247215 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Security Verify Access Appliance |
Affected:
10.0.0.0 , ≤ 10.0.9.0 IF2
(semver)
Affected: 11.0.0.0 , ≤ 11.0.1.0 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.9.0:interm_fix2:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:11.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:11.0.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| IBM | Security Verify Access Docker |
Affected:
10.0.0.0 , ≤ 10.0.9.0 IF2
(semver)
Affected: 11.0.0.0 , ≤ 11.0.1.0 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:10.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:10.0.9.0:interm_fix2:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:11.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:11.0.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-36355",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T19:59:22.629391Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T19:59:35.611Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.9.0:interm_fix2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:11.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:11.0.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Security Verify Access Appliance",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.0.9.0 IF2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "11.0.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:10.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:10.0.9.0:interm_fix2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:11.0.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_docker:11.0.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Security Verify Access Docker",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.0.9.0 IF2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "11.0.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "IBM Security Verify Access and IBM Security Verify Access Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.9.0 and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.1.0 \n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003ecould allow a locally authenticated user to execute malicious scripts from outside of its control sphere.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Security Verify Access and IBM Security Verify Access Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.9.0 and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.1.0 \n\ncould allow a locally authenticated user to execute malicious scripts from outside of its control sphere."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T16:52:30.705Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7247215"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "IBM Security Verify Access code execution",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-36355",
"datePublished": "2025-10-06T16:52:30.705Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-15T21:16:54.209Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-06T19:59:35.611Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-36727 (GCVE-0-2025-36727)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-25 16:37 – Updated: 2025-07-25 17:24
VLAI
Title
SimpleHelp Inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere
Summary
Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability in Simplehelp.This issue affects Simplehelp: before 5.5.12.
Severity
8.3 (High)
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simplehelp | Simplehelp |
Affected:
0 , < 5.5.12
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-36727",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-25T17:24:07.198343Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-25T17:24:23.662Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Simplehelp",
"vendor": "Simplehelp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.5.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability in Simplehelp.\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Simplehelp: before 5.5.12.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability in Simplehelp.This issue affects Simplehelp: before 5.5.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-25T16:37:51.633Z",
"orgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"shortName": "tenable"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2025-24"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SimpleHelp Inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"assignerShortName": "tenable",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-36727",
"datePublished": "2025-07-25T16:37:51.633Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-15T21:53:52.386Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-25T17:24:23.662Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-36852 (GCVE-0-2025-36852)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-10 19:23 – Updated: 2025-06-10 21:35
VLAI
Title
Build Cache Poisoning via Untrusted Pull Requests
Summary
A critical security vulnerability exists in remote cache extensions for common build systems utilizing bucket-based remote cache (such as those using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, or similar object storage) that allows any contributor with pull request privileges to inject compromised artifacts from an untrusted environment into trusted production environments without detection.
The vulnerability exploits a fundamental design flaw in the "first-to-cache wins" principle, where artifacts built in untrusted environments (feature branches, pull requests) can poison the cache used by trusted environments (protected branches, production deployments).
This attack bypasses all traditional security measures including encryption, access controls, and checksum validation because the poisoning occurs during the artifact construction phase, before any security measures are applied.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://nx.app/files/cve-2025-06 |
Impacted products
7 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niklas Portmann | Azure Based Remote Cache Plugin for Nx |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:niklas_portmann:nx-remotecache-azure:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Niklas Portmann | Minio Based Remote Cache Plugin for Nx |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:niklas_portmann:nx-remotecache-minio:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Niklas Portmann | Nx Remote Cache Utilities |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:niklas_portmann:nx-remotecache-custom:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Nx | AWS S3 Remote Cache Plugin for Nx |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:nx:s3-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Nx | GCS Remote Cache Plugin for Nx |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:nx:gcs-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Nx | Azure Blob Remote Cache Plugin for Nx |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:nx:azure-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Nx | Shared File System Cache Plugin for Nx |
Affected:
0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:nx:shared-fs-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-36852",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-10T20:12:14.201636Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-10T20:12:58.460Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:niklas_portmann:nx-remotecache-azure:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "nx-remotecache-azure",
"product": "Azure Based Remote Cache Plugin for Nx",
"repo": "https://github.com/NiklasPor/nx-remotecache-azure",
"vendor": "Niklas Portmann",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:niklas_portmann:nx-remotecache-minio:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "nx-remotecache-minio",
"product": "Minio Based Remote Cache Plugin for Nx",
"repo": "https://github.com/NiklasPor/nx-remotecache-minio",
"vendor": "Niklas Portmann",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:niklas_portmann:nx-remotecache-custom:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "nx-remotecache-custom",
"product": "Nx Remote Cache Utilities",
"repo": "https://github.com/NiklasPor/nx-remotecache-custom",
"vendor": "Niklas Portmann",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:nx:s3-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "@nx/s3-cache",
"product": "AWS S3 Remote Cache Plugin for Nx",
"vendor": "Nx",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:nx:gcs-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "@nx/gcs-cache",
"product": "GCS Remote Cache Plugin for Nx",
"vendor": "Nx",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:nx:azure-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "@nx/azure-cache",
"product": "Azure Blob Remote Cache Plugin for Nx",
"vendor": "Nx",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:nx:shared-fs-cache:0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "@nx/shared-fs-cache",
"product": "Shared File System Cache Plugin for Nx",
"vendor": "Nx",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003eA critical security vulnerability exists in \u003cb\u003eremote cache extensions\u003c/b\u003e for common build systems utilizing bucket-based remote cache (such as those using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, or similar object storage) that allows any contributor with pull request privileges to inject compromised artifacts from an untrusted environment into trusted production environments without detection.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003eThe vulnerability exploits a fundamental design flaw in the \"first-to-cache wins\" principle, where artifacts built in untrusted environments (feature branches, pull requests) can poison the cache used by trusted environments (protected branches, production deployments).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003eThis attack bypasses all traditional security measures including encryption, access controls, and checksum validation because the poisoning occurs during the artifact construction phase, before any security measures are applied.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A critical security vulnerability exists in remote cache extensions for common build systems utilizing bucket-based remote cache (such as those using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, or similar object storage) that allows any contributor with pull request privileges to inject compromised artifacts from an untrusted environment into trusted production environments without detection.\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nThe vulnerability exploits a fundamental design flaw in the \"first-to-cache wins\" principle, where artifacts built in untrusted environments (feature branches, pull requests) can poison the cache used by trusted environments (protected branches, production deployments).\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nThis attack bypasses all traditional security measures including encryption, access controls, and checksum validation because the poisoning occurs during the artifact construction phase, before any security measures are applied."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-141",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-141 Cache Poisoning"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-554",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-554 Functionality Bypass"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-438",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-438 Modification During Manufacture"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "PRESENT",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "RED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/S:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-10T21:35:37.274Z",
"orgId": "36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542c",
"shortName": "HeroDevs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://nx.app/files/cve-2025-06"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Build Cache Poisoning via Untrusted Pull Requests",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542c",
"assignerShortName": "HeroDevs",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-36852",
"datePublished": "2025-06-10T19:23:33.956Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-15T23:50:31.198Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-10T21:35:37.274Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-39666 (GCVE-0-2025-39666)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-07 12:09 – Updated: 2026-04-07 13:18
VLAI
Title
omd: Local privilege escalation when executing omd commands as root
Summary
Local privilege escalation in Checkmk 2.2.0 (EOL), Checkmk 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p46, Checkmk 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p25, and Checkmk 2.5.0 (beta) before 2.5.0b3 allows a site user to escalate their privileges to root, by manipulating files in the site context that are processed when the `omd` administrative command is run by root.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://checkmk.com/werk/18891 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Checkmk GmbH | Checkmk |
Affected:
2.2.0
(semver)
Affected: 2.3.0 , < 2.3.0p46 (semver) Affected: 2.4.0 , < 2.4.0p25 (semver) Affected: 2.5.0b1 , < 2.5.0b3 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-39666",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-07T13:18:12.687066Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T13:18:19.609Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Checkmk",
"vendor": "Checkmk GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.3.0p46",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.4.0p25",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.5.0b3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.5.0b1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:checkmk:checkmk:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:checkmk:checkmk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.3.0p46",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.3.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:checkmk:checkmk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.4.0p25",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.4.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:checkmk:checkmk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.5.0b3",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.5.0b1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Local privilege escalation in Checkmk 2.2.0 (EOL), Checkmk 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p46, Checkmk 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p25, and Checkmk 2.5.0 (beta) before 2.5.0b3 allows a site user to escalate their privileges to root, by manipulating files in the site context that are processed when the `omd` administrative command is run by root."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-471",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-471: Search Order Hijacking"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-17",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-17: Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-426",
"description": "CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T12:09:07.609Z",
"orgId": "f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f",
"shortName": "Checkmk"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://checkmk.com/werk/18891"
}
],
"title": "omd: Local privilege escalation when executing omd commands as root",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f7d6281c-4801-44ce-ace2-493291dedb0f",
"assignerShortName": "Checkmk",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-39666",
"datePublished": "2026-04-07T12:09:07.609Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T07:07:38.257Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T13:18:19.609Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-41390 (GCVE-0-2025-41390)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-20 14:15 – Updated: 2025-11-03 17:44
VLAI
Summary
An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the git functionality of Truffle Security Co. TruffleHog 3.90.2. A specially crafted repository can lead to a arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious respository to trigger this vulnerability.
Severity
7.8 (High)
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Truffle Security Co. | TruffleHog |
Affected:
3.90.2
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-41390",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-20T14:38:23.855752Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-20T14:38:34.557Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T17:44:44.504Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2243"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "TruffleHog",
"vendor": "Truffle Security Co.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.90.2"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Adam Reiser of Cisco ASIG"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the git functionality of Truffle Security Co. TruffleHog 3.90.2. A specially crafted repository can lead to a arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious respository to trigger this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-20T14:15:29.418Z",
"orgId": "b86d76f8-0f8a-4a96-a78d-d8abfc7fc29b",
"shortName": "talos"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2243",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2243"
},
{
"name": "https://trufflesecurity.com/blog/contributor-spotlight-adam-reiser-of-cisco-talos",
"url": "https://trufflesecurity.com/blog/contributor-spotlight-adam-reiser-of-cisco-talos"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b86d76f8-0f8a-4a96-a78d-d8abfc7fc29b",
"assignerShortName": "talos",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-41390",
"datePublished": "2025-10-20T14:15:29.418Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-29T15:53:04.788Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T17:44:44.504Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-49809 (GCVE-0-2025-49809)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-04 00:00 – Updated: 2025-07-08 14:30
VLAI
Summary
mtr through 0.95, in certain privileged contexts, mishandles execution of a program specified by the MTR_PACKET environment variable. NOTE: mtr on macOS may often have Sudo rules, as an indirect consequence of Homebrew not installing setuid binaries.
Severity
7.8 (High)
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-49809",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-08T14:11:17.790058Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T14:30:08.475Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/traviscross/mtr/blob/master/SECURITY"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "mtr",
"vendor": "mtr",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.95",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:mtr:mtr:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "0.95",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "mtr through 0.95, in certain privileged contexts, mishandles execution of a program specified by the MTR_PACKET environment variable. NOTE: mtr on macOS may often have Sudo rules, as an indirect consequence of Homebrew not installing setuid binaries."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-04T12:33:53.377Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/35085"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/traviscross/mtr/blob/master/SECURITY"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/traviscross/mtr/commit/5226f105f087c29d3cfad9f28000e7536af91ac6"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-49809",
"datePublished": "2025-07-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T14:30:08.475Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-52655 (GCVE-0-2025-52655)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-10 08:55 – Updated: 2025-10-10 13:46
VLAI
Title
HCL MyXalytics is affected by a Cross-Domain Script Include vulnerability.
Summary
Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability in HCL MyXalytics. v6.6
allows Loading third-party scripts without integrity checks or validation can allow external code run in the application's context, risking data exposure.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCL | HCL MyXalytics |
Affected:
6.6
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-52655",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-10T13:46:09.371910Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-10T13:46:15.359Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HCL MyXalytics",
"vendor": "HCL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability in HCL MyXalytics. v6.6\u003cbr\u003eallows Loading third-party scripts without integrity checks or validation can allow external code run in the application\u0027s context, risking data exposure."
}
],
"value": "Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability in HCL MyXalytics. v6.6\nallows Loading third-party scripts without integrity checks or validation can allow external code run in the application\u0027s context, risking data exposure."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-10T08:55:40.033Z",
"orgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"shortName": "HCL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0124411"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "As a part of HCL MyXalytics v6.7, these issues have been remediated. For customers using older versions, the mitigation path will include upgrade to version 6.7 which in turn will fix the vulnerabilities during upgrade process. For fix implementation, our HCL MyXalytics support team will provide required the assistance.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "As a part of HCL MyXalytics v6.7, these issues have been remediated. For customers using older versions, the mitigation path will include upgrade to version 6.7 which in turn will fix the vulnerabilities during upgrade process. For fix implementation, our HCL MyXalytics support team will provide required the assistance."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "HCL MyXalytics is affected by a Cross-Domain Script Include vulnerability.",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"assignerShortName": "HCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-52655",
"datePublished": "2025-10-10T08:55:40.033Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-18T14:03:06.891Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-10T13:46:15.359Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-53546 (GCVE-0-2025-53546)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-09 14:27 – Updated: 2025-07-09 16:00
VLAI
Title
Folo allows secrets exfiltration via `pull_request_target`
Summary
Folo organizes feeds content into one timeline. Using pull_request_target on .github/workflows/auto-fix-lint-format-commit.yml can be exploited by attackers, since untrusted code can be executed having full access to secrets (from the base repo). By exploiting the vulnerability is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN which has high privileges. GITHUB_TOKEN can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content write privileges. This vulnerability is fixed in commit 585c6a591440cd39f92374230ac5d65d7dd23d6a.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/security/advisori… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/commit/585c6a5914… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-53546",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-09T16:00:26.658492Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-09T16:00:30.688Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/security/advisories/GHSA-h87r-5w74-qfm4"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Folo",
"vendor": "RSSNext",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 585c6a591440cd39f92374230ac5d65d7dd23d6a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Folo organizes feeds content into one timeline. Using pull_request_target on .github/workflows/auto-fix-lint-format-commit.yml can be exploited by attackers, since untrusted code can be executed having full access to secrets (from the base repo). By exploiting the vulnerability is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN which has high privileges. GITHUB_TOKEN can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content write privileges. This vulnerability is fixed in commit 585c6a591440cd39f92374230ac5d65d7dd23d6a."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-09T14:27:40.848Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/security/advisories/GHSA-h87r-5w74-qfm4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/security/advisories/GHSA-h87r-5w74-qfm4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/commit/585c6a591440cd39f92374230ac5d65d7dd23d6a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RSSNext/Folo/commit/585c6a591440cd39f92374230ac5d65d7dd23d6a"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h87r-5w74-qfm4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Folo allows secrets exfiltration via `pull_request_target`"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-53546",
"datePublished": "2025-07-09T14:27:40.848Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-02T15:15:11.516Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-09T16:00:30.688Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-53841 (GCVE-0-2025-53841)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-03 00:00 – Updated: 2025-12-10 19:40
VLAI
Summary
The GC-AGENTS-SERVICE running as part of Akamai´s Guardicore Platform Agent for Windows versions prior to v49.20.1, v50.15.0, v51.12.0, v52.2.0 is affected by a local privilege escalation vulnerability. The service will attempt to read an OpenSSL configuration file from a non-existent location that standard Windows users have default write access to. This allows an unprivileged local user to create a crafted "openssl.cnf" file in that location and, by specifying the path to a custom DLL file in a custom OpenSSL engine definition, execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Guardicore Agent process. Since Guardicore Agent runs with SYSTEM privileges, this permits an unprivileged user to fully elevate privileges to SYSTEM level in this manner.
Severity
7.8 (High)
CWE
- CWE-829 - Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akamai | Guardicore Platform Agent |
Affected:
0 , < 50.15.0
(custom)
Affected: 51 , < 51.12.0 (custom) Affected: 52 , < 52.1.1 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-53841",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-03T15:43:47.855576Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T15:48:40.398Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Guardicore Platform Agent",
"vendor": "Akamai",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "50.15.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "51.12.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "51",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "52.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "52",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The GC-AGENTS-SERVICE running as part of Akamai\u00b4s Guardicore Platform Agent for Windows versions prior to v49.20.1, v50.15.0, v51.12.0, v52.2.0 is affected by a local privilege escalation vulnerability. The service will attempt to read an OpenSSL configuration file from a non-existent location that standard Windows users have default write access to. This allows an unprivileged local user to create a crafted \"openssl.cnf\" file in that location and, by specifying the path to a custom DLL file in a custom OpenSSL engine definition, execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Guardicore Agent process. Since Guardicore Agent runs with SYSTEM privileges, this permits an unprivileged user to fully elevate privileges to SYSTEM level in this manner."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-829",
"description": "CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T19:40:45.478Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.tuv.com/landingpage/en/vulnerability-disclosure/"
},
{
"url": "https://techdocs.akamai.com/guardicore-platform-agent/changelog"
},
{
"url": "https://community.akamai.com/customers/s/article/Windows-Agent-Vulnerability-Summary-and-Resolution"
},
{
"url": "https://www.akamai.com/blog/security/advisory-cve-2025-53841-guardicore-local-privilege-escalation"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-53841",
"datePublished": "2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-10T19:40:45.478Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation ID: MIT-4
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
Mitigation ID: MIT-21.1
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5.1
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434.
- Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would be removed from the original string, but the remaining characters would still form the "../" string.
Mitigation ID: MIT-34
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately.
- This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
Mitigation ID: MIT-6
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Many file inclusion problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, especially for cookies and URL components.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
CAPEC-175: Code Inclusion
An adversary exploits a weakness on the target to force arbitrary code to be retrieved locally or from a remote location and executed. This differs from code injection in that code injection involves the direct inclusion of code while code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-201: Serialized Data External Linking
An adversary creates a serialized data file (e.g. XML, YAML, etc...) that contains an external data reference. Because serialized data parsers may not validate documents with external references, there may be no checks on the nature of the reference in the external data. This can allow an adversary to open arbitrary files or connections, which may further lead to the adversary gaining access to information on the system that they would normally be unable to obtain.
CAPEC-228: DTD Injection
An attacker injects malicious content into an application's DTD in an attempt to produce a negative technical impact. DTDs are used to describe how XML documents are processed. Certain malformed DTDs (for example, those with excessive entity expansion as described in CAPEC 197) can cause the XML parsers that process the DTDs to consume excessive resources resulting in resource depletion.
CAPEC-251: Local Code Inclusion
The attacker forces an application to load arbitrary code files from the local machine. The attacker could use this to try to load old versions of library files that have known vulnerabilities, to load files that the attacker placed on the local machine during a prior attack, or to otherwise change the functionality of the targeted application in unexpected ways.
CAPEC-252: PHP Local File Inclusion
The attacker loads and executes an arbitrary local PHP file on a target machine. The attacker could use this to try to load old versions of PHP files that have known vulnerabilities, to load PHP files that the attacker placed on the local machine during a prior attack, or to otherwise change the functionality of the targeted application in unexpected ways.
CAPEC-253: Remote Code Inclusion
The attacker forces an application to load arbitrary code files from a remote location. The attacker could use this to try to load old versions of library files that have known vulnerabilities, to load malicious files that the attacker placed on the remote machine, or to otherwise change the functionality of the targeted application in unexpected ways.
CAPEC-263: Force Use of Corrupted Files
This describes an attack where an application is forced to use a file that an attacker has corrupted. The result is often a denial of service caused by the application being unable to process the corrupted file, but other results, including the disabling of filters or access controls (if the application fails in an unsafe way rather than failing by locking down) or buffer overflows are possible.
CAPEC-538: Open-Source Library Manipulation
Adversaries implant malicious code in open source software (OSS) libraries to have it widely distributed, as OSS is commonly downloaded by developers and other users to incorporate into software development projects. The adversary can have a particular system in mind to target, or the implantation can be the first stage of follow-on attacks on many systems.
CAPEC-549: Local Execution of Code
An adversary installs and executes malicious code on the target system in an effort to achieve a negative technical impact. Examples include rootkits, ransomware, spyware, adware, and others.
CAPEC-640: Inclusion of Code in Existing Process
The adversary takes advantage of a bug in an application failing to verify the integrity of the running process to execute arbitrary code in the address space of a separate live process. The adversary could use running code in the context of another process to try to access process's memory, system/network resources, etc. The goal of this attack is to evade detection defenses and escalate privileges by masking the malicious code under an existing legitimate process. Examples of approaches include but not limited to: dynamic-link library (DLL) injection, portable executable injection, thread execution hijacking, ptrace system calls, VDSO hijacking, function hooking, reflective code loading, and more.
CAPEC-660: Root/Jailbreak Detection Evasion via Hooking
An adversary forces a non-restricted mobile application to load arbitrary code or code files, via Hooking, with the goal of evading Root/Jailbreak detection. Mobile device users often Root/Jailbreak their devices in order to gain administrative control over the mobile operating system and/or to install third-party mobile applications that are not provided by authorized application stores (e.g. Google Play Store and Apple App Store). Adversaries may further leverage these capabilities to escalate privileges or bypass access control on legitimate applications. Although many mobile applications check if a mobile device is Rooted/Jailbroken prior to authorized use of the application, adversaries may be able to "hook" code in order to circumvent these checks. Successfully evading Root/Jailbreak detection allows an adversary to execute administrative commands, obtain confidential data, impersonate legitimate users of the application, and more.
CAPEC-695: Repo Jacking
An adversary takes advantage of the redirect property of directly linked Version Control System (VCS) repositories to trick users into incorporating malicious code into their applications.
CAPEC-698: Install Malicious Extension
An adversary directly installs or tricks a user into installing a malicious extension into existing trusted software, with the goal of achieving a variety of negative technical impacts.