Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-250

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges

The product performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses.

CVE-2026-21426 (GCVE-0-2026-21426)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-04 12:41 – Updated: 2026-03-05 04:55
VLAI
Summary
Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions prior to 9.10.1.6 and versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.12.0.1, contains an execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service, elevation of privileges, and information disclosure.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-250 - Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Dell PowerScale OneFS Affected: prior to 9.10.1.6 , < 9.10.1.6 or later (semver)
Affected: 9.11.0.0 through 9.12.0.1 , < 9.13.0.0 or later (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-02-24 18:30
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-21426",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-04T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T04:55:33.342Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "PowerScale OneFS",
          "vendor": "Dell",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "9.10.1.6 or later",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "prior to 9.10.1.6",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "9.13.0.0 or later",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "9.11.0.0 through 9.12.0.1",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-02-24T18:30:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions prior to 9.10.1.6 and versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.12.0.1, contains an execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service, elevation of privileges, and information disclosure.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions prior to 9.10.1.6 and versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.12.0.1, contains an execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service, elevation of privileges, and information disclosure."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.7,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T12:41:35.897Z",
        "orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
        "shortName": "dell"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-sg/000432452/dsa-2026-038-security-update-for-dell-powerscale-onefs-multiple-vulnerabilities"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
    "assignerShortName": "dell",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-21426",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-04T12:41:35.897Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-12-24T16:33:47.095Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T04:55:33.342Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-21882 (GCVE-0-2026-21882)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-02 19:17 – Updated: 2026-03-02 19:44
VLAI
Title
theshit's Improper Privilege Dropping Allows Local Privilege Escalation via Command Re-execution
Summary
theshit is a command-line utility that automatically detects and fixes common mistakes in shell commands. Prior to version 0.2.0, improper privilege dropping allows local privilege escalation via command re-execution. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-273 - Improper Check for Dropped Privileges
  • CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management
  • CWE-250 - Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
AsfhtgkDavid theshit Affected: < 0.2.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-21882",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-02T19:44:23.867553Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T19:44:41.557Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "theshit",
          "vendor": "AsfhtgkDavid",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.2.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "theshit is a command-line utility that automatically detects and fixes common mistakes in shell commands. Prior to version 0.2.0, improper privilege dropping allows local privilege escalation via command re-execution. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-273",
              "description": "CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-269",
              "description": "CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T19:17:22.220Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/security/advisories/GHSA-2j3p-gqw5-g59j",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/security/advisories/GHSA-2j3p-gqw5-g59j"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/commit/5293957b119e55212dce2c6dcbaf1d7eb794602a",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/commit/5293957b119e55212dce2c6dcbaf1d7eb794602a"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-2j3p-gqw5-g59j",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "theshit\u0027s Improper Privilege Dropping Allows Local Privilege Escalation via Command Re-execution"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-21882",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-02T19:17:22.220Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-05T17:24:36.928Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T19:44:41.557Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-22549 (GCVE-0-2026-22549)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-04 15:15 – Updated: 2026-02-04 15:58
VLAI
Title
BIG-IP Container Ingress Services vulnerability
Summary
A vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services that may allow excessive permissions to read cluster secrets.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-250 - Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
Assigner
f5
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
F5 F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services Affected: 2.0.0 , < 2.20.2 (custom)
Affected: 1.0.0 , < * (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-02-04 15:00
Credits
F5
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-22549",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-04T15:58:00.463164Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-04T15:58:22.668Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services",
          "vendor": "F5",
          "versions": [
            {
              "changes": [
                {
                  "at": "2.20.1 with Helm version 0.0.36",
                  "status": "unaffected"
                }
              ],
              "lessThan": "2.20.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.0.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "F5"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-02-04T15:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services that may allow excessive permissions to read cluster secrets.\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp; Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated."
            }
          ],
          "value": "A vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services that may allow excessive permissions to read cluster secrets.\u00a0 Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-04T15:15:36.466Z",
        "orgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
        "shortName": "f5"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000157960"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "INTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "BIG-IP Container Ingress Services vulnerability",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "F5 SIRTBot v1.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
    "assignerShortName": "f5",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-22549",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-04T15:15:36.466Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-21T21:33:16.368Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-04T15:58:22.668Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-23528 (GCVE-0-2026-23528)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-16 16:44 – Updated: 2026-01-16 17:21
VLAI
Title
Dask distributed Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Jupyter Proxy and Dashboard
Summary
Dask distributed is a distributed task scheduler for Dask. Prior to 2026.1.0, when Jupyter Lab, jupyter-server-proxy, and Dask distributed are all run together, it is possible to craft a URL which will result in code being executed by Jupyter due to a cross-side-scripting (XSS) bug in the Dask dashboard. It is possible for attackers to craft a phishing URL that assumes Jupyter Lab and Dask may be running on localhost and using default ports. If a user clicks on the malicious link it will open an error page in the Dask Dashboard via the Jupyter Lab proxy which will cause code to be executed by the default Jupyter Python kernel. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.1.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-80 - Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)
  • CWE-250 - Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
dask distributed Affected: < 2026.1.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-23528",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-16T17:21:28.221629Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-16T17:21:36.324Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "distributed",
          "vendor": "dask",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2026.1.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Dask distributed is a distributed task scheduler for Dask. Prior to 2026.1.0, when Jupyter Lab, jupyter-server-proxy, and Dask distributed are all run together, it is possible to craft a URL which will result in code being executed by Jupyter due to a cross-side-scripting (XSS) bug in the Dask dashboard. It is possible for attackers to craft a phishing URL that assumes Jupyter Lab and Dask may be running on localhost and using default ports. If a user clicks on the malicious link it will open an error page in the Dask Dashboard via the Jupyter Lab proxy which will cause code to be executed by the default Jupyter Python kernel. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.1.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-80",
              "description": "CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-16T16:44:28.152Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/dask/distributed/security/advisories/GHSA-c336-7962-wfj2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/dask/distributed/security/advisories/GHSA-c336-7962-wfj2"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/dask/distributed/commit/ab72092a8a938923c2bb51a2cd14ca26614827fa",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/dask/distributed/commit/ab72092a8a938923c2bb51a2cd14ca26614827fa"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-c336-7962-wfj2",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Dask distributed Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Jupyter Proxy and Dashboard"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-23528",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-16T16:44:28.152Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-13T18:22:43.981Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-16T17:21:36.324Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-23559 (GCVE-0-2026-23559)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-09 15:09 – Updated: 2026-07-09 16:02
VLAI
Title
Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] XAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role Based Access Control. For more details, see: https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles The pool-admin role is fully privileged. Notably, users with this role can also SSH into the host as root. The other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and vm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various aspects of the system. Some settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower privilege of administrator than expected. * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said disks to a VM they control. This is an arbitrary read and/or modify of files in dom0. * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain and mark a VM as a system domain. System domains are ignored and left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be hidden from view in tooling. * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not. * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally restricted to the pool-admin role. However one API was missing this check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware. * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it can allow arbitrary dom0 file write.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-250 - Execution with unnecessary privileges
Assigner
XEN
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Xen XAPI Affected: all
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-04-29 18:05
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-23559",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-09T16:02:25.587757Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T16:02:32.186Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "XAPI",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-04-29T18:05:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\u003cbr\u003e\u003cpre\u003eXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\nBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\n\n  \u003ca href=\"https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\"\u003ehttps://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\u003c/a\u003e\n\nThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\ncan also SSH into the host as root.\n\nThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\nvm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\naspects of the system.\n\nSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\nprivilege of administrator than expected.\n\n * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\n   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\n   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\n   of files in dom0.\n\n * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\n   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\n   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\n   hidden from view in tooling.\n\n * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\n   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\n   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\n   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\n\n * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\n   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\n   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\n\n * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\n   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\n   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write.\u003c/pre\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\n\n\nXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\nBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\n\n   https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles \n\nThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\ncan also SSH into the host as root.\n\nThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\nvm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\naspects of the system.\n\nSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\nprivilege of administrator than expected.\n\n * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\n   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\n   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\n   of files in dom0.\n\n * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\n   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\n   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\n   hidden from view in tooling.\n\n * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\n   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\n   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\n   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\n\n * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\n   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\n   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\n\n * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\n   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\n   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-233",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 9.4,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250 Execution with unnecessary privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T15:09:51.762Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-489.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-23559",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-09T15:09:51.762Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-14T13:07:36.961Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T16:02:32.186Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-23560 (GCVE-0-2026-23560)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-09 15:12 – Updated: 2026-07-09 16:08
VLAI
Title
Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] XAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role Based Access Control. For more details, see: https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles The pool-admin role is fully privileged. Notably, users with this role can also SSH into the host as root. The other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and vm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various aspects of the system. Some settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower privilege of administrator than expected. * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said disks to a VM they control. This is an arbitrary read and/or modify of files in dom0. * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain and mark a VM as a system domain. System domains are ignored and left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be hidden from view in tooling. * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not. * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally restricted to the pool-admin role. However one API was missing this check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware. * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it can allow arbitrary dom0 file write.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-250 - Execution with unnecessary privileges
Assigner
XEN
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Xen XAPI Affected: all
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-04-28 18:05
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-23560",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-09T16:08:07.196380Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T16:08:13.898Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "XAPI",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-04-28T18:05:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\u003cbr\u003eXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\u003cbr\u003eBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\u003cbr\u003ecan also SSH into the host as root.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\u003cbr\u003evm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\u003cbr\u003easpects of the system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\u003cbr\u003eprivilege of administrator than expected.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\u003cbr\u003e   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\u003cbr\u003e   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\u003cbr\u003e   of files in dom0.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\u003cbr\u003e   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\u003cbr\u003e   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\u003cbr\u003e   hidden from view in tooling.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\u003cbr\u003e   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\u003cbr\u003e   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\u003cbr\u003e   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\u003cbr\u003e   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\u003cbr\u003e   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\u003cbr\u003e   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\u003cbr\u003e   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
            }
          ],
          "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\nXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\nBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\n\n  https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\n\nThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\ncan also SSH into the host as root.\n\nThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\nvm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\naspects of the system.\n\nSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\nprivilege of administrator than expected.\n\n * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\n   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\n   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\n   of files in dom0.\n\n * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\n   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\n   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\n   hidden from view in tooling.\n\n * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\n   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\n   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\n   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\n\n * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\n   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\n   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\n\n * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\n   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\n   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-233",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 9.4,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250 Execution with unnecessary privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T15:12:00.013Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-489.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-23560",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-09T15:12:00.013Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-14T13:07:36.961Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T16:08:13.898Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-23561 (GCVE-0-2026-23561)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-09 15:13 – Updated: 2026-07-10 03:55
VLAI
Title
Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] XAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role Based Access Control. For more details, see: https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles The pool-admin role is fully privileged. Notably, users with this role can also SSH into the host as root. The other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and vm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various aspects of the system. Some settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower privilege of administrator than expected. * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said disks to a VM they control. This is an arbitrary read and/or modify of files in dom0. * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain and mark a VM as a system domain. System domains are ignored and left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be hidden from view in tooling. * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not. * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally restricted to the pool-admin role. However one API was missing this check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware. * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it can allow arbitrary dom0 file write.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-250 - Execution with unnecessary privileges
Assigner
XEN
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Xen XAPI Affected: all
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-04-28 18:05
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-23561",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-09T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-10T03:55:44.455Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "XAPI",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-04-28T18:05:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\u003cbr\u003eXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\u003cbr\u003eBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\u003cbr\u003ecan also SSH into the host as root.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\u003cbr\u003evm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\u003cbr\u003easpects of the system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\u003cbr\u003eprivilege of administrator than expected.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\u003cbr\u003e   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\u003cbr\u003e   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\u003cbr\u003e   of files in dom0.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\u003cbr\u003e   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\u003cbr\u003e   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\u003cbr\u003e   hidden from view in tooling.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\u003cbr\u003e   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\u003cbr\u003e   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\u003cbr\u003e   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\u003cbr\u003e   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\u003cbr\u003e   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\u003cbr\u003e   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\u003cbr\u003e   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
            }
          ],
          "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\nXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\nBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\n\n  https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\n\nThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\ncan also SSH into the host as root.\n\nThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\nvm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\naspects of the system.\n\nSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\nprivilege of administrator than expected.\n\n * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\n   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\n   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\n   of files in dom0.\n\n * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\n   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\n   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\n   hidden from view in tooling.\n\n * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\n   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\n   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\n   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\n\n * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\n   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\n   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\n\n * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\n   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\n   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-233",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 9.4,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250 Execution with unnecessary privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T15:13:50.370Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-489.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-23561",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-09T15:13:22.160Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-14T13:07:36.961Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-10T03:55:44.455Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-23562 (GCVE-0-2026-23562)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-09 15:15 – Updated: 2026-07-10 03:55
VLAI
Title
Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI
Summary
[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] XAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role Based Access Control. For more details, see: https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles The pool-admin role is fully privileged. Notably, users with this role can also SSH into the host as root. The other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and vm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various aspects of the system. Some settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower privilege of administrator than expected. * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said disks to a VM they control. This is an arbitrary read and/or modify of files in dom0. * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain and mark a VM as a system domain. System domains are ignored and left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be hidden from view in tooling. * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not. * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally restricted to the pool-admin role. However one API was missing this check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware. * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it can allow arbitrary dom0 file write.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-250 - Execution with unnecessary privileges
Assigner
XEN
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Xen XAPI Affected: all
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-04-28 18:05
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-23562",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-09T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-10T03:55:42.936Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "XAPI",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-04-28T18:05:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\u003cbr\u003eXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\u003cbr\u003eBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e  https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\u003cbr\u003ecan also SSH into the host as root.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\u003cbr\u003evm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\u003cbr\u003easpects of the system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\u003cbr\u003eprivilege of administrator than expected.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\u003cbr\u003e   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\u003cbr\u003e   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\u003cbr\u003e   of files in dom0.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\u003cbr\u003e   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\u003cbr\u003e   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\u003cbr\u003e   hidden from view in tooling.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\u003cbr\u003e   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\u003cbr\u003e   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\u003cbr\u003e   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\u003cbr\u003e   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\u003cbr\u003e   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\u003cbr\u003e   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\u003cbr\u003e   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
            }
          ],
          "value": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\nXAPI can configure different users with different roles, using Role\nBased Access Control.  For more details, see:\n\n  https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xencenter/current-release/rbac-overview.html#rbac-roles\n\nThe pool-admin role is fully privileged.  Notably, users with this role\ncan also SSH into the host as root.\n\nThe other administrator roles are pool-operator, vm-power-admin and\nvm-admin, each of which are authorised to configure and manage various\naspects of the system.\n\nSome settings are inadequately restricted, and can be set by a lower\nprivilege of administrator than expected.\n\n * CVE-2026-23559: A vm-admin can set VBD.other_config:backend-local and\n   turn arbitrary files in dom0 into VDIs (virtual disks) and give said\n   disks to a VM they control.  This is an arbitrary read and/or modify\n   of files in dom0.\n\n * CVE-2026-23560: A vm-admin can set VM.other-config:is_system_domain\n   and mark a VM as a system domain.  System domains are ignored and\n   left running during certain other host/pool operations, and may be\n   hidden from view in tooling.\n\n * CVE-2026-23561: A vm-admin can set VM.other_config:storage_driver_domain\n   and mark a VM as the storage domain for a particular host storage\n   connection (PBD). Shutting down the VM can cause the PBD to be\n   erroneously marked as unplugged when it is not.\n\n * CVE-2026-23562: Configuration of PCI passthrough is normally\n   restricted to the pool-admin role.  However one API was missing this\n   check, allowing a vm-admin access to unintended host hardware.\n\n * CVE-2026-42486: A vm-admin can set the VM.platform:hvm_serial\n   parameter, which should be restricted to the pool-admin role, as it\n   can allow arbitrary dom0 file write."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-233",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-233 Privilege Escalation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 9.4,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250 Execution with unnecessary privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-09T15:15:24.093Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-489.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Multiple RBAC issues in XAPI",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-23562",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-09T15:15:24.093Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-14T13:07:36.961Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-10T03:55:42.936Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-23742 (GCVE-0-2026-23742)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-16 20:07 – Updated: 2026-01-16 20:24
VLAI
Title
Skipper arbitrary code execution through lua filters
Summary
Skipper is an HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition. The default skipper configuration before 0.23.0 was -lua-sources=inline,file. The problem starts if untrusted users can create lua filters, because of -lua-sources=inline , for example through a Kubernetes Ingress resource. The configuration inline allows these user to create a script that is able to read the filesystem accessible to the skipper process and if the user has access to read the logs, they an read skipper secrets. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.0.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
  • CWE-250 - Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
  • CWE-522 - Insufficiently Protected Credentials
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
zalando skipper Affected: < 0.23.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-23742",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-16T20:22:53.499072Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-16T20:24:12.702Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "skipper",
          "vendor": "zalando",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.23.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Skipper is an HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition. The default skipper configuration before 0.23.0 was -lua-sources=inline,file. The problem starts if untrusted users can create lua filters, because of -lua-sources=inline , for example through a Kubernetes Ingress resource. The configuration inline allows these user to create a script that is able to read the filesystem accessible to the skipper process and if the user has access to read the logs, they an read skipper secrets. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-94",
              "description": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-522",
              "description": "CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-16T20:07:46.746Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/zalando/skipper/security/advisories/GHSA-cc8m-98fm-rc9g",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/zalando/skipper/security/advisories/GHSA-cc8m-98fm-rc9g"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/zalando/skipper/commit/0b52894570773b29e2f3c571b94b4211ef8fa714",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/zalando/skipper/commit/0b52894570773b29e2f3c571b94b4211ef8fa714"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/zalando/skipper/releases/tag/v0.23.0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/zalando/skipper/releases/tag/v0.23.0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-cc8m-98fm-rc9g",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Skipper arbitrary code execution through lua filters"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-23742",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-16T20:07:46.746Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-15T15:45:01.958Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-16T20:24:12.702Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-25643 (GCVE-0-2026-25643)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-06 19:16 – Updated: 2026-02-06 20:24
VLAI
Title
Frigate Affected by Authenticated Remote Command Execution (RCE) and Container Escape
Summary
Frigate is a network video recorder (NVR) with realtime local object detection for IP cameras. Prior to 0.16.4, a critical Remote Command Execution (RCE) vulnerability has been identified in the Frigate integration with go2rtc. The application does not sanitize user input in the video stream configuration (config.yaml), allowing direct injection of system commands via the exec: directive. The go2rtc service executes these commands without restrictions. This vulnerability is only exploitable by an administrator or users who have exposed their Frigate install to the open internet with no authentication which allows anyone full administrative control. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.16.4.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
  • CWE-250 - Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
  • CWE-269 - Improper Privilege Management
  • CWE-668 - Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
blakeblackshear frigate Affected: < 0.16.4
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-25643",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-06T20:24:30.544006Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:24:33.963Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/security/advisories/GHSA-4c97-5jmr-8f6x"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "frigate",
          "vendor": "blakeblackshear",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.16.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Frigate is a network video recorder (NVR) with realtime local object detection for IP cameras. Prior to 0.16.4, a critical Remote Command Execution (RCE) vulnerability has been identified in the Frigate integration with go2rtc. The application does not sanitize user input in the video stream configuration (config.yaml), allowing direct injection of system commands via the exec: directive. The go2rtc service executes these commands without restrictions. This vulnerability is only exploitable by an administrator or users who have exposed their Frigate install to the open internet with no authentication which allows anyone full administrative control. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.16.4."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.1,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-78",
              "description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-250",
              "description": "CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-269",
              "description": "CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-668",
              "description": "CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T19:16:26.005Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/security/advisories/GHSA-4c97-5jmr-8f6x",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/security/advisories/GHSA-4c97-5jmr-8f6x"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/releases/tag/v0.16.4",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/releases/tag/v0.16.4"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-4c97-5jmr-8f6x",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Frigate Affected by Authenticated Remote Command Execution (RCE) and Container Escape"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-25643",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-06T19:16:26.005Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-02-04T05:15:41.791Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-06T20:24:33.963Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Mitigation ID: MIT-17

Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

Description:

  • Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-18

Phase: Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

Description:

  • Identify the functionality that requires additional privileges, such as access to privileged operating system resources. Wrap and centralize this functionality if possible, and isolate the privileged code as much as possible from other code [REF-76]. Raise privileges as late as possible, and drop them as soon as possible to avoid CWE-271. Avoid weaknesses such as CWE-288 and CWE-420 by protecting all possible communication channels that could interact with the privileged code, such as a secondary socket that is only intended to be accessed by administrators.
Mitigation ID: MIT-18

Phase: Architecture and Design

Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction

Description:

  • Identify the functionality that requires additional privileges, such as access to privileged operating system resources. Wrap and centralize this functionality if possible, and isolate the privileged code as much as possible from other code [REF-76]. Raise privileges as late as possible, and drop them as soon as possible to avoid CWE-271. Avoid weaknesses such as CWE-288 and CWE-420 by protecting all possible communication channels that could interact with the privileged code, such as a secondary socket that is only intended to be accessed by administrators.
Mitigation

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • Perform extensive input validation for any privileged code that must be exposed to the user and reject anything that does not fit your strict requirements.
Mitigation ID: MIT-19

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • When dropping privileges, ensure that they have been dropped successfully to avoid CWE-273. As protection mechanisms in the environment get stronger, privilege-dropping calls may fail even if it seems like they would always succeed.
Mitigation

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • If circumstances force you to run with extra privileges, then determine the minimum access level necessary. First identify the different permissions that the software and its users will need to perform their actions, such as file read and write permissions, network socket permissions, and so forth. Then explicitly allow those actions while denying all else [REF-76]. Perform extensive input validation and canonicalization to minimize the chances of introducing a separate vulnerability. This mitigation is much more prone to error than dropping the privileges in the first place.
Mitigation ID: MIT-37

Phases: Operation, System Configuration

Strategy: Environment Hardening

Description:

  • Ensure that the software runs properly under the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) [REF-199] or an equivalent hardening configuration guide, which many organizations use to limit the attack surface and potential risk of deployed software.
CAPEC-104: Cross Zone Scripting

An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security.

CAPEC-470: Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database

An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.

CAPEC-69: Target Programs with Elevated Privileges

This attack targets programs running with elevated privileges. The adversary tries to leverage a vulnerability in the running program and get arbitrary code to execute with elevated privileges.

Back to CWE stats page