CWE-918
AllowedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
6670 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-F776-FP4W-266C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-14 20:22 – Updated: 2026-05-19 15:59Summary
Blind server side request forgery (SSRF) via the PDF generate function. The finding resulted from a penetration test for a customer. It is suspected that the root cause of the issue lies within the core of Open WebUI, which is why it is being reported as a security issue here. Tested on Open WebUI 0.5.4.
Details
In the PDF export, user inputs are interpreted as HTML and embedded into the PDF. According to tests, scripts and some potentially dangerous tags (iFrame, Object, etc.) are blocked, preventing server-side content from being read through this vulnerability. However, an image tag can be used to force a server-side request (SSRF), as shown in the following below.
PoC
Start a chat and export the PDF:
Intercept the request and insert an <img> tag into the title:
POST /api/v1/utils/pdf HTTP/2
Host: domain.local
//Some headers removed
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 541
Te: trailers
{"title":"<img src='https://d5jok0s7ghl1p77v5brlqlxwmnsega4z.oastify.com' />","messages":[{"id":"81f24589-384d-431c-a26c-5cd3382ac941","parentId":null,"childrenIds":["0c1a3ee1-6350-4bb4-b95e-fc2341c47e8e"],"role":"user","content":"hallo","timestamp":1736932102,"models":["gpt-4o-POC"]},{"parentId":"81f24589-384d-431c-a26c-5cd3382ac941","id":"0c1a3ee1-6350-4bb4-b95e-fc2341c47e8e","childrenIds":[],"role":"assistant","content":"Hallo! Wie kann ich Ihnen helfen?","model":"gpt-4o-POC","modelName":"gpt-4o-POC","modelIdx":0,"userContext":null,"timestamp":1736932103,"done":true}]}
A HTTPS callback was received at https://d5jok0s7ghl1p77v5brlqlxwmnsega4z.oastify.com.
Impact
A user can force server-side GET requests. During the available testing time, no method was found to read the responses (Blind SSRF). Nonetheless, this should be prevented, as an attacker could enumerate internal assets through response delays and trigger arbitrary GET requests.
Resolution
Fixed in commit 167c8bf00, first released in v0.5.11 (2025-02). The fix wraps every user-controllable field that flows into the PDF HTML template (title, content, role, model, formatted date) in html.escape() before the template f-string is fed to fpdf2.write_html(). The PoC payload <img src='...' /> is escaped to <img src='...' /> and rendered as literal text by fpdf2, with no HTML parsing and no outbound request. Users on >= 0.5.11 are not affected.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45347"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T20:22:02Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-15T22:16:55Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nBlind server side request forgery (SSRF) via the PDF generate function. \nThe finding resulted from a penetration test for a customer. It is suspected that the root cause of the issue lies within the core of Open WebUI, which is why it is being reported as a security issue here. Tested on Open WebUI 0.5.4.\n\n### Details\nIn the PDF export, user inputs are interpreted as HTML and embedded into the PDF. According to tests, scripts and some potentially dangerous tags (iFrame, Object, etc.) are blocked, preventing server-side content from being read through this vulnerability. However, an image tag can be used to force a server-side request (SSRF), as shown in the following below.\n\n### PoC\nStart a chat and export the PDF:\n\n\nIntercept the request and insert an `\u003cimg\u003e` tag into the `title`:\n```http\nPOST /api/v1/utils/pdf HTTP/2\nHost: domain.local\n//Some headers removed\nContent-Type: application/json\nContent-Length: 541\nTe: trailers\n\n{\"title\":\"\u003cimg src=\u0027https://d5jok0s7ghl1p77v5brlqlxwmnsega4z.oastify.com\u0027 /\u003e\",\"messages\":[{\"id\":\"81f24589-384d-431c-a26c-5cd3382ac941\",\"parentId\":null,\"childrenIds\":[\"0c1a3ee1-6350-4bb4-b95e-fc2341c47e8e\"],\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"hallo\",\"timestamp\":1736932102,\"models\":[\"gpt-4o-POC\"]},{\"parentId\":\"81f24589-384d-431c-a26c-5cd3382ac941\",\"id\":\"0c1a3ee1-6350-4bb4-b95e-fc2341c47e8e\",\"childrenIds\":[],\"role\":\"assistant\",\"content\":\"Hallo! Wie kann ich Ihnen helfen?\",\"model\":\"gpt-4o-POC\",\"modelName\":\"gpt-4o-POC\",\"modelIdx\":0,\"userContext\":null,\"timestamp\":1736932103,\"done\":true}]}\n```\n\nA HTTPS callback was received at https://d5jok0s7ghl1p77v5brlqlxwmnsega4z.oastify.com.\n\n### Impact\nA user can force server-side GET requests. During the available testing time, no method was found to read the responses (Blind SSRF). Nonetheless, this should be prevented, as an attacker could enumerate internal assets through response delays and trigger arbitrary GET requests.\n\n## Resolution\n\nFixed in commit [167c8bf00](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/167c8bf00d165af523acfc3b870749f6be6d3e57), first released in **v0.5.11** (2025-02). The fix wraps every user-controllable field that flows into the PDF HTML template (`title`, `content`, `role`, `model`, formatted date) in `html.escape()` before the template f-string is fed to `fpdf2.write_html()`. The PoC payload `\u003cimg src=\u0027...\u0027 /\u003e` is escaped to `\u0026lt;img src=\u0026#x27;...\u0026#x27; /\u0026gt;` and rendered as literal text by fpdf2, with no HTML parsing and no outbound request. Users on `\u003e= 0.5.11` are not affected.",
"id": "GHSA-f776-fp4w-266c",
"modified": "2026-05-19T15:59:48Z",
"published": "2026-05-14T20:22:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-f776-fp4w-266c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45347"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/167c8bf00d165af523acfc3b870749f6be6d3e57"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.5.11"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI vulnerable to blind server side request forgery (SSRF) via the PDF generate function"
}
GHSA-F786-CCX7-HWCW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-11 12:30 – Updated: 2026-08-11 12:30A server-side request forgery vulnerability in HumanSignal Label Studio through 1.24.0.dev0 exists because SSRF_PROTECTION_ENABLED is set to false by default. The import-from-URL endpoint fetches any caller-supplied URL including internal loopback addresses on the default installation. An authenticated user can use this to reach internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and other resources not intended for external access.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-72560"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-11T12:17:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A server-side request forgery vulnerability in HumanSignal Label Studio through 1.24.0.dev0 exists because SSRF_PROTECTION_ENABLED is set to false by default. The import-from-URL endpoint fetches any caller-supplied URL including internal loopback addresses on the default installation. An authenticated user can use this to reach internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and other resources not intended for external access.",
"id": "GHSA-f786-ccx7-hwcw",
"modified": "2026-08-11T12:30:25Z",
"published": "2026-08-11T12:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72560"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7FH-QG34-X2XH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-17 22:18 – Updated: 2026-05-12 13:34Summary
CDP /json/version WebSocket URL could pivot to untrusted second-hop targets.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw - Ecosystem: npm
- Affected versions:
< 2026.4.5 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.4.5
Impact
A browser profile could trust a CDP /json/version response whose webSocketDebuggerUrl pointed at a different host, enabling a second-hop SSRF-style pivot.
Technical Details
The fix normalizes and re-validates direct CDP WebSocket targets before connecting.
Fix
The issue was fixed in #60469. The first stable tag containing the fix is v2026.4.5, and openclaw@2026.4.14 includes the fix.
Fix Commit(s)
bc356cc8c2beaa747c71dd86cceab8f804699665- PR: #60469
Release Process Note
Users should upgrade to openclaw 2026.4.5 or newer. The latest npm release, 2026.4.14, already includes the fix.
Credits
Thanks to @tdjackey for reporting this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.4.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43576"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-17T22:18:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nCDP /json/version WebSocket URL could pivot to untrusted second-hop targets.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw`\n- Ecosystem: npm\n- Affected versions: `\u003c 2026.4.5`\n- Patched versions: `\u003e= 2026.4.5`\n\n## Impact\n\nA browser profile could trust a CDP `/json/version` response whose `webSocketDebuggerUrl` pointed at a different host, enabling a second-hop SSRF-style pivot.\n\n## Technical Details\n\nThe fix normalizes and re-validates direct CDP WebSocket targets before connecting.\n\n## Fix\n\nThe issue was fixed in #60469. The first stable tag containing the fix is `v2026.4.5`, and `openclaw@2026.4.14` includes the fix.\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `bc356cc8c2beaa747c71dd86cceab8f804699665`\n- PR: #60469\n\n## Release Process Note\n\nUsers should upgrade to `openclaw` 2026.4.5 or newer. The latest npm release, `2026.4.14`, already includes the fix.\n\n## Credits\n\nThanks to @tdjackey for reporting this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-f7fh-qg34-x2xh",
"modified": "2026-05-12T13:34:48Z",
"published": "2026-04-17T22:18:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-f7fh-qg34-x2xh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/60469"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/bc356cc8c2beaa747c71dd86cceab8f804699665"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-second-hop-ssrf-via-cdp-json-version-websocket-url"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: CDP /json/version WebSocket URL could pivot to untrusted second-hop targets"
}
GHSA-F7FP-X9MV-9JHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kerfred FG Drupal to WordPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects FG Drupal to WordPress: from n/a through 3.90.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48294"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-16T11:15:25Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kerfred FG Drupal to WordPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects FG Drupal to WordPress: from n/a through 3.90.0.",
"id": "GHSA-f7fp-x9mv-9jhh",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:46Z",
"published": "2025-07-16T12:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48294"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/fg-drupal-to-wp/vulnerability/wordpress-fg-drupal-to-wordpress-plugin-3-90-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7GX-8WV8-8WM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-03 00:31 – Updated: 2026-07-03 00:31Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45499"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-02T23:16:51Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.",
"id": "GHSA-f7gx-8wv8-8wm9",
"modified": "2026-07-03T00:31:53Z",
"published": "2026-07-03T00:31:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45499"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7H5-C625-3795
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-16 12:30 – Updated: 2025-07-18 17:45In Eclipse GlassFish version 6.2.5, it is possible to perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack using specific endpoints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.glassfish.main.admingui:console-common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "6.2.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9408"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-18T17:45:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-16T12:15:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Eclipse GlassFish version 6.2.5, it is possible to perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack using specific endpoints.",
"id": "GHSA-f7h5-c625-3795",
"modified": "2025-07-18T17:45:26Z",
"published": "2025-07-16T12:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9408"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/38"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/239"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Eclipse GlassFish is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery attacks through specific endpoints"
}
GHSA-F7QG-XJ45-W956
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-15 20:31 – Updated: 2025-09-22 15:49Impact
A vulnerability in Ghost's oEmbed mechanism allows staff users to exfiltrate data from internal systems via SSRF.
Vulnerable versions
This vulnerability is present in Ghost v5.99.0 to v5.130.3 to and Ghost v6.0.0 to v6.0.8.
Patches
v5.130.4 and v6.0.9 contain a fix for this issue.
References
The original report is available here: https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/regida
We thank Cristian Vargas for discovering and disclosing this vulnerability responsibly.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at security@ghost.org.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.0.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "ghost"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.0.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.130.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "ghost"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.99.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.130.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-9862"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-15T20:31:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-17T15:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nA vulnerability in Ghost\u0027s oEmbed mechanism allows staff users to exfiltrate data from internal systems via SSRF.\n\n### Vulnerable versions\n\nThis vulnerability is present in Ghost v5.99.0 to v5.130.3 to and Ghost v6.0.0 to v6.0.8.\n\n### Patches\n\nv5.130.4 and v6.0.9 contain a fix for this issue.\n\n### References\n\nThe original report is available here: https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/regida\n\nWe thank Cristian Vargas for discovering and disclosing this vulnerability responsibly. \n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at [security@ghost.org](mailto:security@ghost.org).",
"id": "GHSA-f7qg-xj45-w956",
"modified": "2025-09-22T15:49:29Z",
"published": "2025-09-15T20:31:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/security/advisories/GHSA-f7qg-xj45-w956"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9862"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/01d64c7c0ffbf90cd036195c60ded6d08077d612"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/ffe9d079afa68557c581d224f1ff126e625b06e3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/regida"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/releases/tag/v6.0.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Ghost vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via oEmbed Bookmark"
}
GHSA-F7RM-PM4C-W834
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-15 18:31 – Updated: 2025-08-15 18:31Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal AI SEO Link Advisor allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects AI SEO Link Advisor: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8675"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-15T17:15:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal AI SEO Link Advisor allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects AI SEO Link Advisor: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6.",
"id": "GHSA-f7rm-pm4c-w834",
"modified": "2025-08-15T18:31:12Z",
"published": "2025-08-15T18:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8675"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2025-095"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7V3-XHM6-W245
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 16:22 – Updated: 2026-10-07 16:22Impact
An authenticated user who can register or modify documentation sources may cause a TechDocs build to access resources outside the intended documentation boundary. Depending on deployment configuration, this may expose sensitive backend-host data or internal network resources.
Patches
Patched in @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node version 1.15.4.
Adopters must also use pymdown-extensions version 10.21.3 or newer, normally through mkdocs-techdocs-core version 1.7.0 or newer. @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node does not control the Python dependencies used by the generator; with an older PyMdown release, snippets may remain vulnerable to file inclusion even after their configuration is sanitized.
Workarounds
- Generate TechDocs only from trusted repositories with reviewed MkDocs configuration.
- Use isolated build environments with restricted filesystem access and network egress.
- Prefer externally generated TechDocs with appropriately sandboxed CI.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-106557"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T16:22:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAn authenticated user who can register or modify documentation sources may cause a TechDocs build to access resources outside the intended documentation boundary. Depending on deployment configuration, this may expose sensitive backend-host data or internal network resources.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` version `1.15.4`.\n\nAdopters must also use `pymdown-extensions` version `10.21.3` or newer, normally through `mkdocs-techdocs-core` version `1.7.0` or newer. `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node` does not control the Python dependencies used by the generator; with an older PyMdown release, snippets may remain vulnerable to file inclusion even after their configuration is sanitized.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Generate TechDocs only from trusted repositories with reviewed MkDocs configuration.\n- Use isolated build environments with restricted filesystem access and network egress.\n- Prefer externally generated TechDocs with appropriately sandboxed CI.",
"id": "GHSA-f7v3-xhm6-w245",
"modified": "2026-10-07T16:22:58Z",
"published": "2026-10-07T16:22:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-f7v3-xhm6-w245"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/017ace52d9b327ededc6704cf17799c875ae0f29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/2d9de4ca117a529de4b6ed7dfb7aa507ca7b3f91"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.50.5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Backstage has improper input validation in TechDocs Markdown extension configuration"
}
GHSA-F85C-9HH8-HMWH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-13 21:37 – Updated: 2026-10-13 21:37ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-76001"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-13T21:18:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker\u0027s control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.",
"id": "GHSA-f85c-9hh8-hmwh",
"modified": "2026-10-13T21:37:31Z",
"published": "2026-10-13T21:37:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-76001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.adobe.com/trust/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-144.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery
An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.