Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

Allowed

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

4862 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-289V-J7VM-CM7Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:45 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:45
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 12.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a SSRF attack through the Outbound Requests feature.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-22179"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-24T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab versions before 12.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a SSRF attack through the Outbound Requests feature.",
  "id": "GHSA-289v-j7vm-cm7q",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:45:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:45:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1055816"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2021/CVE-2021-22179.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/293733"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-28CV-7XWR-65C6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-02 18:31 – Updated: 2025-10-02 21:31
VLAI
Details

VitaraCharts 5.3.5 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in fileLoader.jsp.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-57305"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-02T16:15:35Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "VitaraCharts 5.3.5 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in fileLoader.jsp.",
  "id": "GHSA-28cv-7xwr-65c6",
  "modified": "2025-10-02T21:31:18Z",
  "published": "2025-10-02T18:31:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mattz.io/posts/cve-2025-57305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://vitaracharts.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-28F5-38XR-JH2W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-28 14:26 – Updated: 2026-07-28 14:26
VLAI
Summary
java-client Allows Network Pivot via Unvalidated directConnect Redirect in AppiumCommandExecutor
Details

Summary

When directConnect(true) is enabled, appium/java-client unconditionally accepts directConnectHost, directConnectPort, and directConnectPath from the server's NEW_SESSION response and silently redirects all subsequent session traffic to the attacker-specified endpoint — with no allowlist, no host validation, and no user notification.

Affected Code

  • AppiumCommandExecutor.java (line 196–219): setDirectConnect() builds a new URL from server-supplied fields and calls overrideServerUrl(newUrl) without validating host/IP.
  • DirectConnect.java: getUrl() constructs protocol://host:port/path with no allowlist.

Root Cause

Only the protocol is validated (must equal "https"). The destination host and port are never checked against any allowlist or denylist.

PoC (confirmed)

A rogue server injecting directConnectHost=127.0.0.1:4443 causes the client to silently redirect all post-session commands:

[bootstrap] POST /wd/hub/session [bootstrap] Injecting directConnect -> https://127.0.0.1:4443/wd/hub [redirect-target] HIT #1: GET /wd/hub/session/poc-session-001/source [redirect-target] HIT #2: DELETE /wd/hub/session/poc-session-001

Original source code unmodified — confirmed via git diff HEAD (empty).

Evidence Screenshots

Screenshot 1 — Rogue server capturing redirected traffic:

1

Screenshot 2 — Java client processing response from attacker host:

2

Impact

  • Full interception of session traffic
  • Network pivot to internal hosts (RFC-1918, 169.254.169.254)
  • Cloud credential theft via IMDS endpoint
  • Escalates to ~8.1 High in CI/CD environments where directConnect(true) is set in shared base configuration

Suggested Fix

Add allowlist validation before overrideServerUrl() is called, and/or block RFC-1918/loopback/link-local destinations by default.

poc_appium_directconnect.zip

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 10.1.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.appium:java-client"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "8.2.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "10.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43910"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-441",
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-28T14:26:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nWhen `directConnect(true)` is enabled, appium/java-client unconditionally\naccepts `directConnectHost`, `directConnectPort`, and `directConnectPath`\nfrom the server\u0027s NEW_SESSION response and silently redirects all subsequent\nsession traffic to the attacker-specified endpoint \u2014 with no allowlist,\nno host validation, and no user notification.\n\n## Affected Code\n\n- `AppiumCommandExecutor.java` (line 196\u2013219): `setDirectConnect()` builds\n  a new URL from server-supplied fields and calls `overrideServerUrl(newUrl)`\n  without validating host/IP.\n- `DirectConnect.java`: `getUrl()` constructs `protocol://host:port/path`\n  with no allowlist.\n\n## Root Cause\n\nOnly the protocol is validated (must equal \"https\"). The destination host\nand port are never checked against any allowlist or denylist.\n\n## PoC (confirmed)\n\nA rogue server injecting `directConnectHost=127.0.0.1:4443` causes the\nclient to silently redirect all post-session commands:\n\n[bootstrap]       POST /wd/hub/session\n[bootstrap]       Injecting directConnect -\u003e https://127.0.0.1:4443/wd/hub\n[redirect-target] HIT #1: GET /wd/hub/session/poc-session-001/source\n[redirect-target] HIT #2: DELETE /wd/hub/session/poc-session-001\n\nOriginal source code unmodified \u2014 confirmed via `git diff HEAD` (empty).\n\n## Evidence Screenshots\n\n**Screenshot 1 \u2014 Rogue server capturing redirected traffic:**\n\n\u003cimg width=\"887\" height=\"146\" alt=\"1\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc28002c-ea20-4ac8-8336-cec632e3c842\" /\u003e\n\n**Screenshot 2 \u2014 Java client processing response from attacker host:**\n\n\u003cimg width=\"788\" height=\"130\" alt=\"2\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/222cbab0-0d53-45b2-847d-6aa4e3b79370\" /\u003e\n\n## Impact\n\n- Full interception of session traffic\n- Network pivot to internal hosts (RFC-1918, 169.254.169.254)\n- Cloud credential theft via IMDS endpoint\n- Escalates to ~8.1 High in CI/CD environments where directConnect(true)\n  is set in shared base configuration\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nAdd allowlist validation before `overrideServerUrl()` is called, and/or\nblock RFC-1918/loopback/link-local destinations by default.\n\n[poc_appium_directconnect.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/26472525/poc_appium_directconnect.zip)",
  "id": "GHSA-28f5-38xr-jh2w",
  "modified": "2026-07-28T14:26:53Z",
  "published": "2026-07-28T14:26:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/appium/java-client/security/advisories/GHSA-28f5-38xr-jh2w"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/appium/java-client/pull/2408"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/appium/java-client/commit/2b9cd442b9dbf56ccc6f1e83aeeb411c0ec230c9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/appium/java-client"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/appium/java-client/releases/tag/v10.1.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "java-client Allows Network Pivot via Unvalidated directConnect Redirect in AppiumCommandExecutor"
}

GHSA-28JJ-P35H-662J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-31 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-08 00:00
VLAI
Details

Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.38.0 allows SSRF.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-27907"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-30T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.38.0 allows SSRF.",
  "id": "GHSA-28jj-p35h-662j",
  "modified": "2022-04-08T00:00:32Z",
  "published": "2022-03-31T00:00:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27907"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sonatype.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.sonatype.com/hc/en-us/articles/5011047953555"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-28PF-M5G8-4RQM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-28 12:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Compress WP Compress for MainWP allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Compress for MainWP: from n/a through 6.30.03.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-31076"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-28T10:15:16Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Compress WP Compress for MainWP allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Compress for MainWP: from n/a through 6.30.03.",
  "id": "GHSA-28pf-m5g8-4rqm",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:11Z",
  "published": "2025-03-28T12:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31076"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-compress-mainwp/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-compress-for-mainwp-plugin-6-30-03-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-28V8-9MR3-438F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-01 06:30 – Updated: 2024-08-01 06:30
VLAI
Details

The Remote Content Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5 via the remote_content shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-2090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-01T05:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Remote Content Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5 via the remote_content shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.",
  "id": "GHSA-28v8-9mr3-438f",
  "modified": "2024-08-01T06:30:34Z",
  "published": "2024-08-01T06:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/remote-content-shortcode"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ec93f360-2eed-4858-b36f-8cc17f7b4ac1?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-28VQ-345C-25GG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-27 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-27 12:31
VLAI
Details

Kimi Code (@moonshot-ai/kimi-code) before 0.27.0 implements FetchURL SSRF hardening as a static hostname and IP-literal denylist in assertSafeFetchTarget, without resolving DNS or re-validating hosts after HTTP redirects. An attacker who can influence a FetchURL call (for example via prompt injection) can supply a crafted public hostname that resolves to loopback or another internal address, or a public URL that redirects to such a target, and thereby reach internal network services that the denylist was intended to block. FetchURL is included in the default auto-approve tool set, so the call does not require interactive user confirmation in manual mode.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-17534"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-27T10:16:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Kimi Code (@moonshot-ai/kimi-code) before 0.27.0 implements FetchURL SSRF hardening as a static hostname and IP-literal denylist in assertSafeFetchTarget, without resolving DNS or re-validating hosts after HTTP redirects. An attacker who can influence a FetchURL call (for example via prompt injection) can supply a crafted public hostname that resolves to loopback or another internal address, or a public URL that redirects to such a target, and thereby reach internal network services that the denylist was intended to block. FetchURL is included in the default auto-approve tool set, so the call does not require interactive user confirmation in manual mode.",
  "id": "GHSA-28vq-345c-25gg",
  "modified": "2026-07-27T12:31:16Z",
  "published": "2026-07-27T12:31:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-17534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/pull/1791"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/commit/31449728b72df94e22bcb2de350a1e7624895e30"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/releases/tag/%40moonshot-ai%2Fkimi-code%400.27.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2928-R2W9-GM4X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-21 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-08 18:30
VLAI
Details

Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.12 allows SSRF because of the configuration of the chat proxy.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-62763"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-21T17:15:41Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.12 allows SSRF because of the configuration of the chat proxy.",
  "id": "GHSA-2928-r2w9-gm4x",
  "modified": "2025-12-08T18:30:24Z",
  "published": "2025-10-21T18:30:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62763"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.zimbra.com/2025/10/patch-release-update-zimbra-10-1-12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.12#Security_Fixes"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2944-57XV-2682

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-02 19:07 – Updated: 2026-07-02 19:07
VLAI
Summary
@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs: `data:` URI allowed without size restriction
Details

Finding

Location: core/src/shared/secure-fetch.ts:33-35

data: URIs were allowed without any restriction. While data: URIs don't make network requests, they can be used for memory exhaustion via very large data URIs.

Status

Fixed in v0.2.136data: URIs are now limited to 1MB. URIs exceeding this limit throw an error.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.2.136"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-02T19:07:44Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Finding\n\n**Location**: `core/src/shared/secure-fetch.ts:33-35`\n\n`data:` URIs were allowed without any restriction. While `data:` URIs don\u0027t make network requests, they can be used for memory exhaustion via very large data URIs.\n\n## Status\n\n**Fixed in v0.2.136** \u2014 `data:` URIs are now limited to 1MB. URIs exceeding this limit throw an error.",
  "id": "GHSA-2944-57xv-2682",
  "modified": "2026-07-02T19:07:44Z",
  "published": "2026-07-02T19:07:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/asymmetric-effort/specifyjs/security/advisories/GHSA-2944-57xv-2682"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/asymmetric-effort/specifyjs/commit/25d1fb491d99479efdf501f5f75e0bb80c908f0a"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/asymmetric-effort/specifyjs"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs: `data:` URI allowed without size restriction"
}

GHSA-2988-FJ4Q-FRXV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-26 15:30 – Updated: 2025-05-26 15:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was found in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.11.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function ResourceLoader.getResource of the file /cms/fileTemplate/form of the component URI Scheme Handler. The manipulation of the argument Name leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-5186"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-26T13:15:20Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.11.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function ResourceLoader.getResource of the file /cms/fileTemplate/form of the component URI Scheme Handler. The manipulation of the argument Name leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-2988-fj4q-frxv",
  "modified": "2025-05-26T15:30:34Z",
  "published": "2025-05-26T15:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-5186"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/xiaoyangsec/JeeSite_SSRF/blob/main/jeesite5-ssrf-file-read.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.310274"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.310274"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.581704"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery

An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.