Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-863

Allowed-with-Review

Incorrect Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

5528 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-M4H2-MJFM-MP55

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-06 18:47 – Updated: 2026-03-09 13:12
VLAI
Summary
Mercurius's queryDepth limit bypassed for WebSocket subscriptions
Details

Description

Mercurius fails to enforce the configured queryDepth limit on GraphQL subscription queries received over WebSocket connections. The depth check is correctly applied to HTTP queries and mutations, but subscription queries are parsed and executed without invoking the depth validation. This allows a remote client to submit arbitrarily deeply nested subscription queries over WebSocket, bypassing the intended depth restriction. On schemas with recursive types, this can lead to denial of service through exponential data resolution on each subscription event.

Workarounds

Disable subscriptions and, in general, queries over the WebSocket.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "mercurius"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "16.8.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-30241"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-06T18:47:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-06T22:16:01Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "## Description\n\nMercurius fails to enforce the configured queryDepth limit on GraphQL subscription queries received over WebSocket connections. The depth check is correctly applied to HTTP queries and mutations, but subscription queries are parsed and executed without invoking the depth validation. This allows a remote client to submit arbitrarily deeply nested subscription queries over WebSocket, bypassing the intended depth restriction. On schemas with recursive types, this can lead to denial of service through exponential data resolution on each subscription event.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nDisable subscriptions and, in general, queries over the WebSocket.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4h2-mjfm-mp55",
  "modified": "2026-03-09T13:12:23Z",
  "published": "2026-03-06T18:47:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mercurius-js/mercurius/security/advisories/GHSA-m4h2-mjfm-mp55"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30241"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mercurius-js/mercurius/commit/5b56f60f4b0d60780b0ff499a479bd830bdd6986"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/mercurius-js/mercurius"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Mercurius\u0027s queryDepth limit bypassed for WebSocket subscriptions"
}

GHSA-M4JG-5F6H-V8Q3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:13 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:01
VLAI
Details

This issue was addressed with improved data protection. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.4. A malicious application may be able to bypass certain Privacy preferences.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-30751"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-09-08T14:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "This issue was addressed with improved data protection. This issue is fixed in macOS Big Sur 11.4. A malicious application may be able to bypass certain Privacy preferences.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4jg-5f6h-v8q3",
  "modified": "2022-07-13T00:01:24Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:13:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-30751"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212529"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M4PG-623X-3C8H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-29 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-02 00:01
VLAI
Details

D-Link DIR845L A1 contains a authentication vulnerability via an AUTHORIZED_GROUP=1 value, as demonstrated by a request for getcfg.php.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-36755"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-28T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "D-Link DIR845L A1 contains a authentication vulnerability via an AUTHORIZED_GROUP=1 value, as demonstrated by a request for getcfg.php.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4pg-623x-3c8h",
  "modified": "2022-09-02T00:01:05Z",
  "published": "2022-08-29T00:00:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36755"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yc4aYBiU_ao-YYCNGPfayhwWIaXxkWQJ/view?usp=sharing"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M4QH-QP46-JWG7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-23 18:33 – Updated: 2024-10-23 18:33
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have a valid account on the device that is configured with a custom read-only role.

This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of role permissions in part of the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a write operation on the affected part of the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify certain parts of the configuration.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-20482"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-23T18:15:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have a valid account on the device that is configured with a custom read-only role.\n\n This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of role permissions in part of the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a write operation on the affected part of the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify certain parts of the configuration.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4qh-qp46-jwg7",
  "modified": "2024-10-23T18:33:09Z",
  "published": "2024-10-23T18:33:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20482"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-priv-esc-CMQ4S6m7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M4RH-5WPC-FV8R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-11 00:02
VLAI
Details

The admin API module in the QuizGame extension for MediaWiki through 1.37.2 (before 665e33a68f6fa1167df99c0aa18ed0157cdf9f66) omits a check for the quizadmin user.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-29906"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-04-29T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The admin API module in the QuizGame extension for MediaWiki through 1.37.2 (before 665e33a68f6fa1167df99c0aa18ed0157cdf9f66) omits a check for the quizadmin user.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4rh-5wpc-fv8r",
  "modified": "2022-05-11T00:02:04Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T00:00:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29906"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/QuizGame/+/765651"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T302199"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M4V8-WQVR-P9F7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-04 14:20 – Updated: 2025-11-04 19:44
VLAI
Summary
Undici's Proxy-Authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect for dispatch, request, stream, pipeline
Details

Impact

Undici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for fetch(), but did not clear them for undici.request().

Patches

This has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75. Fixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.

Workarounds

use fetch() or disable maxRedirections.

References

Linzi Shang reported this.

  • https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074
  • https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "undici"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.28.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "undici"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.11.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-30260"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-285",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-04T14:20:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T16:15:08Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nUndici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for `fetch()`, but did not clear them for `undici.request()`.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75.\nFixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nuse `fetch()` or disable `maxRedirections`.\n\n### References\n\nLinzi Shang reported this.\n\n* https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074\n* https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3",
  "id": "GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7",
  "modified": "2025-11-04T19:44:28Z",
  "published": "2024-04-04T14:20:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30260"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/64e3402da4e032e68de46acb52800c9a06aaea3f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HQVHWAS6WDXXIU7F72XI55VZ2LTZUB33"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NC3V3HFZ5MOJRZDY5ZELL6REIRSPFROJ"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P6Q4RGETHVYVHDIQGTJGU5AV6NJEI67E"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240905-0008"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Undici\u0027s Proxy-Authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect for dispatch, request, stream, pipeline"
}

GHSA-M56J-8CWC-QGV8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-02-27 06:31
VLAI
Details

The installers for multiple products provided by Soliton Systems K.K. contain an issue with incorrect default permissions, which may allow arbitrary code to be executed with SYSTEM privileges.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-27653"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-276",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-27T06:17:59Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The installers for multiple products provided by Soliton Systems K.K. contain an issue with incorrect default permissions, which may allow arbitrary code to be executed with SYSTEM privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-m56j-8cwc-qgv8",
  "modified": "2026-02-27T06:31:28Z",
  "published": "2026-02-27T06:31:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27653"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN41357120"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.soliton.co.jp/support/2026/006679.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M5C2-384P-37R2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:05 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:05
VLAI
Details

The FTP Server in Cisco IOS 11.3 through 12.4 does not properly check user authorization, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, and have other impact including reading startup-config, as demonstrated by a crafted MKD command that involves access to a VTY device and overflows a buffer, aka bug ID CSCek55259.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-2586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-05-10T00:19:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The FTP Server in Cisco IOS 11.3 through 12.4 does not properly check user authorization, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, and have other impact including reading startup-config, as demonstrated by a crafted MKD command that involves access to a VTY device and overflows a buffer, aka bug ID CSCek55259.",
  "id": "GHSA-m5c2-384p-37r2",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:05:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:05:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5036"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2009/Jan/0183.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25199"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a00808399d0.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6155"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/35334"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/494868"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23885"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018030"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1749"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-M5FR-488C-22RQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:15 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:15
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered on Virgin Media Super Hub 3 (based on ARRIS TG2492) devices. Because their SNMP commands have insufficient protection mechanisms, it is possible to use JavaScript and DNS rebinding to leak the WAN IP address of a user (if they are using certain VPN implementations, this would decloak them).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-16651"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-09-20T14:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered on Virgin Media Super Hub 3 (based on ARRIS TG2492) devices. Because their SNMP commands have insufficient protection mechanisms, it is possible to use JavaScript and DNS rebinding to leak the WAN IP address of a user (if they are using certain VPN implementations, this would decloak them).",
  "id": "GHSA-m5fr-488c-22rq",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:15:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:15:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16651"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fidusinfosec.com/silently-unmasking-virgin-media-vpn-users-in-seconds-cve-2019-16651"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/vpn-users-unmasked-by-zero-day-vulnerability-in-virgin-media-routers"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-M5GV-VJ3F-6V2P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-12 21:31 – Updated: 2025-12-12 22:12
VLAI
Summary
Liferay Portal and DXP Instance Admin can execute code using Objects Actions and Validations
Details

In Liferay Portal 7.4.3.27 through 7.4.3.42, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 update 27 through update 42 (Liferay PaaS, and Liferay Self-Hosted), the Objects module does not restrict the use of Groovy scripts in Object actions for Admin Users. This allows remote authenticated admin users with the Instance Administrator role to execute arbitrary Groovy scripts (i.e., remote code execution) through Object actions.

In contrast, in Liferay DXP (Liferay SaaS), the use of Groovy in Object actions is not allowed due to the high security risks it poses.

Starting from Liferay DXP 2024.Q2 and later, a new feature has been introduced in Instance Settings that allows administrators to configure whether Groovy scripts are allowed in their instances.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.liferay:com.liferay.object.service"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.96"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-3586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-12T22:12:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-01T18:15:29Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In Liferay Portal 7.4.3.27 through 7.4.3.42, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 update 27 through update 42 (Liferay PaaS, and Liferay Self-Hosted), the Objects module does not restrict the use of Groovy scripts in Object actions for Admin Users. This allows remote authenticated admin users with the Instance Administrator role to execute arbitrary Groovy scripts (i.e., remote code execution) through Object actions. \n\nIn contrast, in Liferay DXP (Liferay SaaS), the use of Groovy in Object actions is not allowed due to the high security risks it poses. \n\nStarting from Liferay DXP 2024.Q2 and later, a new feature has been introduced in Instance Settings that allows administrators to configure whether Groovy scripts are allowed in their instances.",
  "id": "GHSA-m5gv-vj3f-6v2p",
  "modified": "2025-12-12T22:12:32Z",
  "published": "2025-12-12T21:31:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal/commit/3b9e3bb1462ccd33ede05f73f45b38b8262f018f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal/commit/79ddc243e60864c0c30cfccb1cc46e705e922cb0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal/commit/b2aa19be228fb308ebe8ae1f47d3224e1fd06225"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://liferay.atlassian.net/browse/LPE-17586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://liferay.dev/portal/security/known-vulnerabilities/-/asset_publisher/jekt/content/CVE-2025-3586"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Liferay Portal and DXP Instance Admin can execute code using Objects Actions and Validations"
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.