CWE-863
Allowed-with-ReviewIncorrect Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
5513 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-M4QH-QP46-JWG7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-23 18:33 – Updated: 2024-10-23 18:33A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have a valid account on the device that is configured with a custom read-only role.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of role permissions in part of the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a write operation on the affected part of the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify certain parts of the configuration.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-20482"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-23T18:15:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have a valid account on the device that is configured with a custom read-only role.\n\n This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of role permissions in part of the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a write operation on the affected part of the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify certain parts of the configuration.",
"id": "GHSA-m4qh-qp46-jwg7",
"modified": "2024-10-23T18:33:09Z",
"published": "2024-10-23T18:33:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20482"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-priv-esc-CMQ4S6m7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M4RH-5WPC-FV8R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-11 00:02The admin API module in the QuizGame extension for MediaWiki through 1.37.2 (before 665e33a68f6fa1167df99c0aa18ed0157cdf9f66) omits a check for the quizadmin user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-29906"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-29T04:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The admin API module in the QuizGame extension for MediaWiki through 1.37.2 (before 665e33a68f6fa1167df99c0aa18ed0157cdf9f66) omits a check for the quizadmin user.",
"id": "GHSA-m4rh-5wpc-fv8r",
"modified": "2022-05-11T00:02:04Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T00:00:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/QuizGame/+/765651"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T302199"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M4V8-WQVR-P9F7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-04 14:20 – Updated: 2025-11-04 19:44Impact
Undici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for fetch(), but did not clear them for undici.request().
Patches
This has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75. Fixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.
Workarounds
use fetch() or disable maxRedirections.
References
Linzi Shang reported this.
- https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.28.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.11.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-30260"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-285",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-04T14:20:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T16:15:08Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nUndici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for `fetch()`, but did not clear them for `undici.request()`.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75.\nFixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nuse `fetch()` or disable `maxRedirections`.\n\n### References\n\nLinzi Shang reported this.\n\n* https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074\n* https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3",
"id": "GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7",
"modified": "2025-11-04T19:44:28Z",
"published": "2024-04-04T14:20:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30260"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/64e3402da4e032e68de46acb52800c9a06aaea3f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/6805746680d27a5369d7fb67bc05f95a28247d75"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2408074"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HQVHWAS6WDXXIU7F72XI55VZ2LTZUB33"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NC3V3HFZ5MOJRZDY5ZELL6REIRSPFROJ"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P6Q4RGETHVYVHDIQGTJGU5AV6NJEI67E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240905-0008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Undici\u0027s Proxy-Authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect for dispatch, request, stream, pipeline"
}
GHSA-M56J-8CWC-QGV8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-02-27 06:31The installers for multiple products provided by Soliton Systems K.K. contain an issue with incorrect default permissions, which may allow arbitrary code to be executed with SYSTEM privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-27653"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-276",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-27T06:17:59Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The installers for multiple products provided by Soliton Systems K.K. contain an issue with incorrect default permissions, which may allow arbitrary code to be executed with SYSTEM privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-m56j-8cwc-qgv8",
"modified": "2026-02-27T06:31:28Z",
"published": "2026-02-27T06:31:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN41357120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.soliton.co.jp/support/2026/006679.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-M5C2-384P-37R2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:05 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:05The FTP Server in Cisco IOS 11.3 through 12.4 does not properly check user authorization, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, and have other impact including reading startup-config, as demonstrated by a crafted MKD command that involves access to a VTY device and overflows a buffer, aka bug ID CSCek55259.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-2586"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-05-10T00:19:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The FTP Server in Cisco IOS 11.3 through 12.4 does not properly check user authorization, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, and have other impact including reading startup-config, as demonstrated by a crafted MKD command that involves access to a VTY device and overflows a buffer, aka bug ID CSCek55259.",
"id": "GHSA-m5c2-384p-37r2",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:05:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:05:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34197"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2009/Jan/0183.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25199"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a00808399d0.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6155"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/35334"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/494868"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23885"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1749"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M5FR-488C-22RQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:15 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:15An issue was discovered on Virgin Media Super Hub 3 (based on ARRIS TG2492) devices. Because their SNMP commands have insufficient protection mechanisms, it is possible to use JavaScript and DNS rebinding to leak the WAN IP address of a user (if they are using certain VPN implementations, this would decloak them).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-16651"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-20T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered on Virgin Media Super Hub 3 (based on ARRIS TG2492) devices. Because their SNMP commands have insufficient protection mechanisms, it is possible to use JavaScript and DNS rebinding to leak the WAN IP address of a user (if they are using certain VPN implementations, this would decloak them).",
"id": "GHSA-m5fr-488c-22rq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:15:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:15:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16651"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fidusinfosec.com/silently-unmasking-virgin-media-vpn-users-in-seconds-cve-2019-16651"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/vpn-users-unmasked-by-zero-day-vulnerability-in-virgin-media-routers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M5GV-VJ3F-6V2P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-12 21:31 – Updated: 2025-12-12 22:12In Liferay Portal 7.4.3.27 through 7.4.3.42, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 update 27 through update 42 (Liferay PaaS, and Liferay Self-Hosted), the Objects module does not restrict the use of Groovy scripts in Object actions for Admin Users. This allows remote authenticated admin users with the Instance Administrator role to execute arbitrary Groovy scripts (i.e., remote code execution) through Object actions.
In contrast, in Liferay DXP (Liferay SaaS), the use of Groovy in Object actions is not allowed due to the high security risks it poses.
Starting from Liferay DXP 2024.Q2 and later, a new feature has been introduced in Instance Settings that allows administrators to configure whether Groovy scripts are allowed in their instances.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.liferay:com.liferay.object.service"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.96"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-3586"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-12T22:12:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-01T18:15:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Liferay Portal 7.4.3.27 through 7.4.3.42, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 update 27 through update 42 (Liferay PaaS, and Liferay Self-Hosted), the Objects module does not restrict the use of Groovy scripts in Object actions for Admin Users. This allows remote authenticated admin users with the Instance Administrator role to execute arbitrary Groovy scripts (i.e., remote code execution) through Object actions. \n\nIn contrast, in Liferay DXP (Liferay SaaS), the use of Groovy in Object actions is not allowed due to the high security risks it poses. \n\nStarting from Liferay DXP 2024.Q2 and later, a new feature has been introduced in Instance Settings that allows administrators to configure whether Groovy scripts are allowed in their instances.",
"id": "GHSA-m5gv-vj3f-6v2p",
"modified": "2025-12-12T22:12:32Z",
"published": "2025-12-12T21:31:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal/commit/3b9e3bb1462ccd33ede05f73f45b38b8262f018f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal/commit/79ddc243e60864c0c30cfccb1cc46e705e922cb0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal/commit/b2aa19be228fb308ebe8ae1f47d3224e1fd06225"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://liferay.atlassian.net/browse/LPE-17586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://liferay.dev/portal/security/known-vulnerabilities/-/asset_publisher/jekt/content/CVE-2025-3586"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Liferay Portal and DXP Instance Admin can execute code using Objects Actions and Validations"
}
GHSA-M5JP-P3R5-MFQP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-10 00:30 – Updated: 2026-04-18 00:43Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-h4jx-hjr3-fhgc. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw before 2026.3.25 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the gateway plugin subagent fallback deleteSession function that uses a synthetic operator.admin runtime scope. Attackers can exploit this by triggering session deletion without a request-scoped client to execute privileged operations with unintended administrative scope.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.3.24"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-648",
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-18T00:43:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-09T22:16:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-h4jx-hjr3-fhgc. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw before 2026.3.25 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the gateway plugin subagent fallback deleteSession function that uses a synthetic operator.admin runtime scope. Attackers can exploit this by triggering session deletion without a request-scoped client to execute privileged operations with unintended administrative scope.",
"id": "GHSA-m5jp-p3r5-mfqp",
"modified": "2026-04-18T00:43:39Z",
"published": "2026-04-10T00:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-h4jx-hjr3-fhgc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35645"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/b5d785f1a59a56c3471f2cef328f7c9a6c15f3e7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-privilege-escalation-via-synthetic-operator-admin-in-deletesession"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: OpenClaw: Gateway Plugin Subagent Fallback `deleteSession` Uses Synthetic `operator.admin`",
"withdrawn": "2026-04-18T00:43:39Z"
}
GHSA-M5QG-RVJQ-727P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-21 20:34 – Updated: 2026-05-21 20:34Summary
The OAuth token strategy attached oauth_scope and oauth_granted_resources to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricted scope (e.g. MCP-only) therefore inherited the full permissions of the underlying user across all routes; the granted_resources.base_id restriction was bypassed on org-level endpoints that don't populate req.context.base_id.
Details
In packages/nocodb/src/strategies/oauth-token.strategy.ts, the strategy set is_oauth_token, oauth_client_id, oauth_granted_resources, and oauth_scope on the user object, then mapped through to the user's existing roles / base_roles. The ACL middleware in extract-ids.middleware.ts honoured is_api_token via blockApiTokenAccess but had no equivalent gate for is_oauth_token or scope-string enforcement.
The base/workspace restriction logic short-circuited when req.context.base_id was unset (org-level routes), so an OAuth token scoped to one base could still call org-level endpoints as the underlying user.
The fix adds a path-prefix allowlist (['/mcp', '/api/v3/', '/auth/user/me']) enforced inside the strategy and a blockOAuthTokenAccess ACL flag for endpoints that should never accept OAuth tokens.
Impact
- Scope escalation: tokens issued with a narrow scope received the underlying user's full role.
- Resource boundary bypass: per-base restrictions did not apply to org-level routes.
- Violates least-privilege expectation for third-party OAuth integrations.
Credit
This issue was reported by @ik0z.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "nocodb"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.301.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-46549"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-21T20:34:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe OAuth token strategy attached `oauth_scope` and `oauth_granted_resources` to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricted scope (e.g. MCP-only) therefore inherited the full permissions of the underlying user across all routes; the `granted_resources.base_id` restriction was bypassed on org-level endpoints that don\u0027t populate `req.context.base_id`.\n\n### Details\n\nIn `packages/nocodb/src/strategies/oauth-token.strategy.ts`, the strategy set `is_oauth_token`, `oauth_client_id`, `oauth_granted_resources`, and `oauth_scope` on the user object, then mapped through to the user\u0027s existing `roles` / `base_roles`. The ACL middleware in `extract-ids.middleware.ts` honoured `is_api_token` via `blockApiTokenAccess` but had no equivalent gate for `is_oauth_token` or scope-string enforcement.\n\nThe base/workspace restriction logic short-circuited when `req.context.base_id` was unset (org-level routes), so an OAuth token scoped to one base could still call org-level endpoints as the underlying user.\n\nThe fix adds a path-prefix allowlist (`[\u0027/mcp\u0027, \u0027/api/v3/\u0027, \u0027/auth/user/me\u0027]`) enforced inside the strategy and a `blockOAuthTokenAccess` ACL flag for endpoints that should never accept OAuth tokens.\n\n### Impact\n\n- Scope escalation: tokens issued with a narrow scope received the underlying user\u0027s full role.\n- Resource boundary bypass: per-base restrictions did not apply to org-level routes.\n- Violates least-privilege expectation for third-party OAuth integrations.\n\n### Credit\n\nThis issue was reported by [@ik0z](https://github.com/ik0z).",
"id": "GHSA-m5qg-rvjq-727p",
"modified": "2026-05-21T20:34:51Z",
"published": "2026-05-21T20:34:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-m5qg-rvjq-727p"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "NocoDB: OAuth Token Scope Not Enforced at ACL Layer Allows Scope Escalation"
}
GHSA-M62G-7V8J-3FWC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-16 14:37 – Updated: 2024-09-17 18:33app/Controller/UserLoginProfilesController.php in MISP before 2.4.198 does not prevent an org admin from viewing sensitive login fields of another org admin in the same org.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46918"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-15T20:15:02Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "app/Controller/UserLoginProfilesController.php in MISP before 2.4.198 does not prevent an org admin from viewing sensitive login fields of another org admin in the same org.",
"id": "GHSA-m62g-7v8j-3fwc",
"modified": "2024-09-17T18:33:25Z",
"published": "2024-09-16T14:37:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/3a5227d7b3d4518ac109af61979a00145a0de6fa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/compare/v2.4.197...v2.4.198"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.