Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

Weakness Allowed-with-Review

Missing Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

Dimensions

  • Behavior-Property: Missing
  • Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance

This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate

Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit

Relationships and members
ChildOf: CWE-285 · View CWE-1000
  • Behavior-Property: Improper
ChildOf: CWE-284 · View CWE-1340
  • Behavior-Property: Improper
  • Behavior-Type: Access Control
Modes of introduction
Architecture and Design

OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.

Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.

Implementation

A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.

Operation
Detection methods

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.

Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.

Effectiveness: Limited

Automated Dynamic Analysis

Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.

Manual Analysis

This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.

Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.

Effectiveness: Moderate

These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.

Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Web Application Scanner

Web Services Scanner

Database Scanners

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Host Application Interface Scanner

Fuzz Tester

Framework-based Fuzzer

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source

Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Source code Weakness Analyzer

Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Architecture or Design Review

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:

Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)

Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction

Effectiveness: High

Notes

Terminology

Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.

Content history
Submission: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-05-24 · CWE 1.13
Contribution: "Mapping CWE to 62443" Sub-Working Group · CWE-CAPEC ICS/OT SIG · 2023-04-25 · CWE 4.11

Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.

Contribution: Abhi Balakrishnan · 2024-02-29 · CWE 4.16

Provided diagram to improve CWE usability

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-06-27 · CWE 2.0

updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-09-13 · CWE 2.1

updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2012-05-11 · CWE 2.2

updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2012-10-30 · CWE 2.3

updated Potential_Mitigations

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2014-02-18 · CWE 2.6

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2014-07-30 · CWE 2.8

updated Detection_Factors

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2017-01-19 · CWE 2.10

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2017-11-08 · CWE 3.0

updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2018-03-27 · CWE 3.1

updated References

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2019-06-20 · CWE 3.3

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-02-24 · CWE 4.0

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-08-20 · CWE 4.2

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-12-10 · CWE 4.3

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-03-15 · CWE 4.4

updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-07-20 · CWE 4.5

updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-10-28 · CWE 4.6

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2022-06-28 · CWE 4.8

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2022-10-13 · CWE 4.9

updated Observed_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-01-31 · CWE 4.10

updated Description, Potential_Mitigations

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-04-27 · CWE 4.11

updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-06-29 · CWE 4.12

updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2024-11-19 · CWE 4.16

updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-09-09 · CWE 4.18

updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-12-11 · CWE 4.19

updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2026-04-30 · CWE 4.20

updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2026-10-28 · CWE 5.0

updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

20074 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-JGMR-FG2F-G83Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-11 18:31
VLAI
Details

MoguBlog through 6.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the POST /pictureSort/getPictureSortByUid endpoint, which omits the @AuthorityVerify annotation required to enforce role-based permissions. Authenticated back-office users without image-category permissions can supply a category uid to retrieve restricted image-category records including metadata such as name, cover file uid, sort order and timestamps.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89265"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T16:17:51Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "MoguBlog through 6.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the POST /pictureSort/getPictureSortByUid endpoint, which omits the @AuthorityVerify annotation required to enforce role-based permissions. Authenticated back-office users without image-category permissions can supply a category uid to retrieve restricted image-category records including metadata such as name, cover file uid, sort order and timestamps.",
  "id": "GHSA-jgmr-fg2f-g83q",
  "modified": "2026-09-11T18:31:25Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T18:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89265"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitee.com/moxi159753/mogu_blog_v2/releases"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/LinYuanyi1/cve-request-poc/blob/master/mogublog-poc/C13_pictureSort_getByUid_bfla.py"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/moxi624/mogu_blog_v2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/moxi624/mogu_blog_v2/blob/025d78c7ac7e19b1abf796fa3cc158d855723d15/mogu_admin/src/main/java/com/moxi/mogublog/admin/restapi/PictureSortRestApi.java"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mogublog-through-6.2-missing-authorization-on-the-admin-getpicturesortbyuid-endpoint"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JGQG-V28Q-JXGH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-19 00:01 – Updated: 2022-03-29 00:01
VLAI
Details

Automotive Grade Linux Kooky Koi 11.0.0, 11.0.1, 11.0.2, 11.0.3, 11.0.4, and 11.0.5 is affected by Incorrect Access Control in usr/bin/afb-daemon. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker should send a well-crafted HTTP (or WebSocket) request to the socket listened by the afb-daemon process. No credentials nor user interactions are required.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-24595"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-18T12:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Automotive Grade Linux Kooky Koi 11.0.0, 11.0.1, 11.0.2, 11.0.3, 11.0.4, and 11.0.5 is affected by Incorrect Access Control in usr/bin/afb-daemon. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker should send a well-crafted HTTP (or WebSocket) request to the socket listened by the afb-daemon process. No credentials nor user interactions are required.",
  "id": "GHSA-jgqg-v28q-jxgh",
  "modified": "2022-03-29T00:01:38Z",
  "published": "2022-03-19T00:01:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24595"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://youtu.be/E-ZTuWSg-JU"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JGV4-5FJV-3XP7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-07 21:30 – Updated: 2026-08-07 21:30
VLAI
Details

Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.18.21 through 2.0.2 are vulnerable to a partial arbitrary file read when configured to use the Vault Connect CA provider with JWT or AppRole authentication. A privileged attacker with operator:write permission may direct Consul to read and forward credential files outside the intended scope, potentially leading to the exfiltration of sensitive secrets from the Consul server host. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-19017, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-19017"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-07T20:16:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.18.21 through 2.0.2 are vulnerable to a partial arbitrary file read when configured to use the Vault Connect CA provider with JWT or AppRole authentication. A privileged attacker with `operator:write` permission may direct Consul to read and forward credential files outside the intended scope, potentially leading to the exfiltration of sensitive secrets from the Consul server host. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-19017, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3.",
  "id": "GHSA-jgv4-5fjv-3xp7",
  "modified": "2026-08-07T21:30:38Z",
  "published": "2026-08-07T21:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-19017"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-25-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul/77629"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JGWP-VC7J-PQJ9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-09 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in woobewoo Product Filter by WBW allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Product Filter by WBW: from n/a through 2.5.0.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-50877"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-09T13:15:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in woobewoo Product Filter by WBW allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Product Filter by WBW: from n/a through 2.5.0.",
  "id": "GHSA-jgwp-vc7j-pqj9",
  "modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:22Z",
  "published": "2024-12-09T15:31:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50877"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/woo-product-filter/vulnerability/wordpress-product-filter-by-wbw-plugin-2-5-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JGX6-27QX-3G2X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:11 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:11
VLAI
Details

An arbitrary file write vulnerability in lib/AjaxHandlers/ajaxEditTemplate.php of rConfig 3.9.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-27466"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-08-20T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An arbitrary file write vulnerability in lib/AjaxHandlers/ajaxEditTemplate.php of rConfig 3.9.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file.",
  "id": "GHSA-jgx6-27qx-3g2x",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:11:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:11:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-27466"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://ssd-disclosure.com/ssd-advisory-rconfig-unauthenticated-rce"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-JGXP-79J8-M39M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-18 03:31 – Updated: 2024-07-18 03:31
VLAI
Details

The Meks Video Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized API key modification due to a missing capability check on the ajax_save_settings function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.11. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify the plugin's API keys

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-6599"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-18T02:15:03Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Meks Video Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized API key modification due to a missing capability check on the ajax_save_settings function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.11. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify the plugin\u0027s API keys",
  "id": "GHSA-jgxp-79j8-m39m",
  "modified": "2024-07-18T03:31:32Z",
  "published": "2024-07-18T03:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6599"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/meks-video-importer/trunk/includes/class.meks-video-importer-vimeo.php#L74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/meks-video-importer/trunk/includes/class.meks-video-importer-youtube.php#L98"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/eaf9cc48-1ba6-4e9b-9f49-54f7747c26e0?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JH28-P6W6-8GF8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 00:34 – Updated: 2026-08-04 00:34
VLAI
Details

Missing authorization in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-66326"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-04T00:17:39Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing authorization in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.",
  "id": "GHSA-jh28-p6w6-8gf8",
  "modified": "2026-08-04T00:34:55Z",
  "published": "2026-08-04T00:34:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-66326"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-66326"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JH2F-HWV7-P5G3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 15:30 – Updated: 2026-08-12 15:30
VLAI
Details

An unauthenticated user may access restricted Artifactory content when a credentialed remote repository is configured in a specific way.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68753"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-12T15:18:21Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An unauthenticated user may access restricted Artifactory content when a credentialed remote repository is configured in a specific way.",
  "id": "GHSA-jh2f-hwv7-p5g3",
  "modified": "2026-08-12T15:30:48Z",
  "published": "2026-08-12T15:30:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68753"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JH32-V29G-68PQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-12 19:32 – Updated: 2026-06-12 19:32
VLAI
Summary
TYPO3 CMS has Privilege Escalation & SQL Injection in its Form Framework
Details

Problem

Backend users with write access to the form_definition database table were able to directly create, update, or delete form definition records via DataHandler, bypassing the Form Framework's persistence validation and permission checks. This allowed injecting arbitrary form configurations, re-enabling attack vectors originally addressed in TYPO3-CORE-SA-2018-003, including SQL injection and privilege escalation.

Solution

Update to TYPO3 version 14.3.3 LTS that fixes the problem described.

Credits

TYPO3 CMS thanks Selçuk Güney for reporting this issue, and to TYPO3 core & security team member Oliver Hader for fixing it.

Resources

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "14.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "14.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "typo3/cms-form"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "14.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "14.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49741"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862",
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-12T19:32:22Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-09T11:16:53Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Problem\nBackend users with write access to the `form_definition` database table were able to directly create, update, or delete form definition records via `DataHandler`, bypassing the Form Framework\u0027s persistence validation and permission checks. This allowed injecting arbitrary form configurations, re-enabling attack vectors originally addressed in [TYPO3-CORE-SA-2018-003](https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2018-003), including SQL injection and privilege escalation.\n\n### Solution\nUpdate to TYPO3 version 14.3.3 LTS that fixes the problem described.\n\n### Credits\nTYPO3 CMS thanks Sel\u00e7uk G\u00fcney for reporting this issue, and to TYPO3 core \u0026 security team member Oliver Hader for fixing it.\n\n### Resources\n* [TYPO3-CORE-SA-2026-017](https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2026-017)",
  "id": "GHSA-jh32-v29g-68pq",
  "modified": "2026-06-12T19:32:23Z",
  "published": "2026-06-12T19:32:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3/security/advisories/GHSA-jh32-v29g-68pq"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49741"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3/commit/c90493c13b633f328cf2c066182c90a1655ff0fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/typo3/cms-core/CVE-2026-49741.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/typo3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2018-003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2026-017"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "TYPO3 CMS has Privilege Escalation \u0026 SQL Injection in its Form Framework"
}

GHSA-JH3W-6JP2-VQQM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-26 19:47 – Updated: 2023-04-26 19:47
VLAI
Summary
Missing permission check of canView in GridFieldPrintButton
Details

The GridField print view incorrectly validates the permission of DataObjects potentially allowing a content author to view records they are not authorised to access.

Upgrade to silverstripe/framework 4.12.5 or above to address the issue.

Reported by Stephan Bauer from relaxt Webdienstleistungsagentur GmbH

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "silverstripe/framework"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.12.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-22728"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-04-26T19:47:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-26T14:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The GridField print view incorrectly validates the permission of DataObjects potentially allowing a content author to view records they are not authorised to access. \n\nUpgrade to `silverstripe/framework` 4.12.5 or above to address the issue.\n\nReported by Stephan Bauer from [relaxt Webdienstleistungsagentur GmbH](https://www.relaxt.at/)",
  "id": "GHSA-jh3w-6jp2-vqqm",
  "modified": "2023-04-26T19:47:07Z",
  "published": "2023-04-26T19:47:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework/security/advisories/GHSA-jh3w-6jp2-vqqm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22728"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework/commit/fd5d8217e83768d7bf841e94b2d4d82642d5bc58"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/silverstripe/framework/CVE-2023-22728.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.silverstripe.org/download/security-releases/cve-2023-22728"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Missing permission check of canView in GridFieldPrintButton"
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws

An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.