CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
20019 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-FXWQ-QQHR-34Q4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-11 18:31 – Updated: 2026-05-11 18:31In Meari IoT Cloud alert image storage on Alibaba OSS (latest observed; storage service version not disclosed), motion snapshots are retrievable without authentication, signed URLs, or expiry enforcement. URLs function as direct object references and remain valid beyond expected operational windows.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33359"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-11T17:16:30Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Meari IoT Cloud alert image storage on Alibaba OSS (latest observed; storage service version not disclosed), motion snapshots are retrievable without authentication, signed URLs, or expiry enforcement. URLs function as direct object references and remain valid beyond expected operational windows.",
"id": "GHSA-fxwq-qqhr-34q4",
"modified": "2026-05-11T18:31:45Z",
"published": "2026-05-11T18:31:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33359"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/xn0tsa/nobody-puts-baby-in-a-corner"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.runzero.com/advisories/meari-unauthenticated-alert-image-access-in-cloud-object-storage-cve-2026-33359"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G225-M5GC-PHVJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:31 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:31AtomXCMS 2.0 is affected by Arbitrary File Read via admin/dump.php
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-26650"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-10-22T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "AtomXCMS 2.0 is affected by Arbitrary File Read via admin/dump.php",
"id": "GHSA-g225-m5gc-phvj",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:31:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26650"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Drunyacoder/AtomXCMS-2/issues/20"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G246-2588-XPCW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-03 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Missing Authorization vulnerability in Realwebcare Image Gallery – Responsive Photo Gallery allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Image Gallery – Responsive Photo Gallery: from n/a through 1.0.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-24697"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-03T15:15:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Realwebcare Image Gallery \u2013 Responsive Photo Gallery allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Image Gallery \u2013 Responsive Photo Gallery: from n/a through 1.0.5.",
"id": "GHSA-g246-2588-xpcw",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:33Z",
"published": "2025-02-03T15:32:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24697"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/awesome-responsive-photo-gallery/vulnerability/wordpress-image-gallery-responsive-photo-gallery-plugin-1-0-5-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G24J-J8M9-65FG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-13 00:31 – Updated: 2026-10-13 00:31Frappe ERPNext before 15.120.0 and 16.x before 16.23.0 contains an authorization bypass in an endpoint that honours a caller-supplied flag disabling its own permission enforcement. Authenticated attackers can set this flag when calling the endpoint to skip permission checks and read party records beyond their permitted role.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-109621"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-12T23:17:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Frappe ERPNext before 15.120.0 and 16.x before 16.23.0 contains an authorization bypass in an endpoint that honours a caller-supplied flag disabling its own permission enforcement. Authenticated attackers can set this flag when calling the endpoint to skip permission checks and read party records beyond their permitted role.",
"id": "GHSA-g24j-j8m9-65fg",
"modified": "2026-10-13T00:31:27Z",
"published": "2026-10-13T00:31:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/security/advisories/GHSA-wwgm-3pv3-gmqh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109621"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/frappe-erpnext-before-15.120.0-unauthorized-party-record-access-via-permission-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G24P-55F9-P54C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-18 00:31 – Updated: 2026-09-18 00:31The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar – Amelia plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification of data due to a missing ownership verification on /users/customers/ endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with wpamelia-provider role, to view and modify arbitrary customers, including password reset. Takeover of WordPress user accounts, with the roles up to Editor, is also possible if that user had made an Amelia booking. This vulnerability affects only the Premium version of the plugin, where the Employee Panel is present.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-14311"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T22:16:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar \u2013 Amelia plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification of data due to a missing ownership verification on /users/customers/\u003cid\u003e endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with wpamelia-provider role, to view and modify arbitrary customers, including password reset. Takeover of WordPress user accounts, with the roles up to Editor, is also possible if that user had made an Amelia booking. This vulnerability affects only the Premium version of the plugin, where the Employee Panel is present.",
"id": "GHSA-g24p-55f9-p54c",
"modified": "2026-09-18T00:31:06Z",
"published": "2026-09-18T00:31:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14311"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3614392"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/df09d88a-2cda-4ab1-99a0-c54e98cf59e5?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G25R-GVQ3-WRQ7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-25 19:36 – Updated: 2023-02-07 15:49Impact
An issue was discovered in Rancher where an authorization logic flaw allows an authenticated user on any downstream cluster to (1) open a shell pod in the Rancher local cluster and (2) have limited kubectl access to it. The expected behavior is that a user does not have such access in the Rancher local cluster unless explicitly granted.
This issue does not allow the user to escalate privileges in the local cluster directly (this would require another vulnerability to be exploited).
The security issue happens in two different ways:
-
Shell pod access - This is when a user opens a shell pod in the Rancher UI to a downstream cluster that the user has permission to access. The web request can be intercepted using the browser's web inspector/network console or a proxy tool to change the shell's destination to the Rancher
localcluster instead of the desired downstream cluster. -
This flaw cannot be exploited to access a downstream cluster that the user has no permissions to.
-
The shell pod runs with a limited non-root user, reducing the severity of this issue. However, even as a non-root user, it is still possible download and run binaries inside the shell pod.
-
The blast radius of this issue can increase based on the configuration of the
localcluster. For example:-
If the
localcluster has unlimited network access, e.g. to the Internet, the user can open a reverse network connection to the shell pod. -
Or access the cloud metadata API of the underlying cloud infrastructure, where the user can extract the credentials associated with the
localcluster and use them to interact with the cloud environment (this will be limited by the permissions granted to the cloud credentials in question). -
Check further recommendations about liming access to the cloud metadata API in Rancher's security best practices.
-
-
Kubectl access - When downloading the kubeconfig file of a downstream cluster that the user has access to, the
servercluster address in the kubeconfig file can be changed to point to the Rancherlocalcluster instead of the intended downstream cluster.-
This can also be achieved by crafting a kubeconfig using a Rancher token instead of using the kubeconfig from an active cluster.
-
This flaw cannot be exploited to access a downstream cluster that the user has no permissions to.
-
Notes:
- Rancher local cluster means the cluster where Rancher is installed. It is named as local inside the list of clusters in the Rancher UI.
- Audit logs in Rancher can be used to identify possible abuses of this issue, by tracking API requests to the user ID of the user that performed the action. API audit logs can be enabled as described in the documentation when set to level 1 or above.
Workarounds
There is no workaround or direct mitigation besides updating to a patched Rancher version.
Patches
Patched versions include releases 2.5.17, 2.6.10, 2.7.1 and later versions.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Reach out to SUSE Rancher Security team for security related inquiries.
- Open an issue in Rancher repository.
- Verify our support matrix and product support lifecycle.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/rancher"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.5.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/rancher"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/rancher/rancher"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-21953"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-285",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-01-25T19:36:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-07T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAn issue was discovered in Rancher where an authorization logic flaw allows an authenticated user on any downstream cluster to (1) open a shell pod in the Rancher `local` cluster and (2) have limited `kubectl` access to it. The expected behavior is that a user does not have such access in the Rancher `local` cluster unless explicitly granted.\n\nThis issue does not allow the user to escalate privileges in the `local` cluster directly (this would require another vulnerability to be exploited).\n\nThe security issue happens in two different ways:\n\n1. Shell pod access - This is when a user opens a shell pod in the Rancher UI to a downstream cluster that the user has permission to access. The web request can be intercepted using the browser\u0027s web inspector/network console or a proxy tool to change the shell\u0027s destination to the Rancher `local` cluster instead of the desired downstream cluster.\n\n - This flaw cannot be exploited to access a downstream cluster that the user has no permissions to.\n\n - The shell pod runs with a limited non-root user, reducing the severity of this issue. However, even as a non-root user, it is still possible download and run binaries inside the shell pod.\n\n - The blast radius of this issue can increase based on the configuration of the `local` cluster. For example:\n\n - If the `local` cluster has unlimited network access, e.g. to the Internet, the user can open a reverse network connection to the shell pod.\n\n - Or access the cloud metadata API of the underlying cloud infrastructure, where the user can extract the credentials associated with the `local` cluster and use them to interact with the cloud environment (this will be limited by the permissions granted to the cloud credentials in question). \n\n - Check further recommendations about liming access to the cloud metadata API in Rancher\u0027s [security best practices](https://ranchermanager.docs.rancher.com/reference-guides/rancher-security/kubernetes-security-best-practices).\n\n2. Kubectl access - When downloading the kubeconfig file of a downstream cluster that the user has access to, the `server` cluster address in the kubeconfig file can be changed to point to the Rancher `local` cluster instead of the intended downstream cluster.\n\n - This can also be achieved by crafting a kubeconfig using a Rancher token instead of using the kubeconfig from an active cluster. \n\n - This flaw cannot be exploited to access a downstream cluster that the user has no permissions to.\n\nNotes:\n- Rancher `local` cluster means the cluster where Rancher is installed. It is named as `local` inside the list of clusters in the Rancher UI.\n- Audit logs in Rancher can be used to identify possible abuses of this issue, by tracking API requests to the user ID of the user that performed the action. API audit logs can be enabled as described in the [documentation](https://ranchermanager.docs.rancher.com/how-to-guides/advanced-user-guides/enable-api-audit-log) when set to level `1` or above.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere is no workaround or direct mitigation besides updating to a patched Rancher version.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched versions include releases 2.5.17, 2.6.10, 2.7.1 and later versions.\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Reach out to [SUSE Rancher Security team](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/policy) for security related inquiries.\n* Open an issue in [Rancher](https://github.com/rancher/rancher/issues/new/choose) repository.\n* Verify our [support matrix](https://www.suse.com/suse-rancher/support-matrix/all-supported-versions/) and [product support lifecycle](https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/).",
"id": "GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7",
"modified": "2023-02-07T15:49:33Z",
"published": "2023-01-25T19:36:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-g25r-gvq3-wrq7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21953"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199731"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/rancher"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Authenticated user can gain unauthorized shell pod and kubectl access in the local cluster"
}
GHSA-G27J-R52H-RGGQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-25 15:34 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Missing Authorization vulnerability in WPZOOM Recipe Card Blocks for Gutenberg & Elementor allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Recipe Card Blocks for Gutenberg & Elementor: from n/a through 3.4.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-26983"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-25T15:15:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in WPZOOM Recipe Card Blocks for Gutenberg \u0026 Elementor allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Recipe Card Blocks for Gutenberg \u0026 Elementor: from n/a through 3.4.3.",
"id": "GHSA-g27j-r52h-rggq",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:50Z",
"published": "2025-02-25T15:34:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26983"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/recipe-card-blocks-by-wpzoom/vulnerability/wordpress-recipe-card-blocks-for-gutenberg-elementor-plugin-3-4-3-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G28C-HCR7-J2FW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-01 15:31 – Updated: 2024-11-01 15:31Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ahmed Kaludi, Mohammed Kaludi AMP for WP allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects AMP for WP: from n/a through 1.0.96.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-43146"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-01T15:15:39Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ahmed Kaludi, Mohammed Kaludi AMP for WP allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects AMP for WP: from n/a through 1.0.96.1.",
"id": "GHSA-g28c-hcr7-j2fw",
"modified": "2024-11-01T15:31:59Z",
"published": "2024-11-01T15:31:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43146"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/accelerated-mobile-pages/wordpress-accelerated-mobile-pages-plugin-1-0-96-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G28P-6MCC-V4RV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-10 15:31 – Updated: 2026-08-13 20:50Missing permission checks in Jenkins 2.567 and earlier, LTS 2.555.2 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to determine other users' configured timezone and to enumerate view names of other users' "My Views".
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.555.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.556"
},
{
"fixed": "2.568"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53439"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-13T20:50:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T14:16:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing permission checks in Jenkins 2.567 and earlier, LTS 2.555.2 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to determine other users\u0027 configured timezone and to enumerate view names of other users\u0027 \"My Views\".",
"id": "GHSA-g28p-6mcc-v4rv",
"modified": "2026-08-13T20:50:46Z",
"published": "2026-06-10T15:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53439"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/0586de425598497cfb4dcdafa5007e507a440a77"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/98fe05f1753f664ffddd295a03492684b74e1950"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-10/#SECURITY-3713"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins exposes other users\u0027 timezone and view names to users with Overall/Read permission"
}
GHSA-G293-CH5F-PCJX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-12 12:30 – Updated: 2024-03-12 12:30The LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the publish_lp() function hooked via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with subscriber-level access and above to change the LadiPage key (a key fully controlled by the attacker), enabling them to freely create new pages, including web pages that trigger stored XSS
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-4728"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-12T10:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the publish_lp() function hooked via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with subscriber-level access and above to change the LadiPage key (a key fully controlled by the attacker), enabling them to freely create new pages, including web pages that trigger stored XSS",
"id": "GHSA-g293-ch5f-pcjx",
"modified": "2024-03-12T12:30:47Z",
"published": "2024-03-12T12:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4728"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ladipage/trunk/ladipage.php#L1992"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6dafc81c-f1be-422d-b34f-87f1956e8849?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.