CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
19955 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-F8W7-GF8J-VVV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Missing Authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Timetics allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Timetics: from n/a through 1.0.29.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30828"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T11:15:44Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Arraytics Timetics allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Timetics: from n/a through 1.0.29.",
"id": "GHSA-f8w7-gf8j-vvv3",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:07Z",
"published": "2025-03-27T12:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30828"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/timetics/vulnerability/wordpress-timetics-plugin-1-0-29-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8W9-QHQQ-34G5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-29 18:32 – Updated: 2026-10-02 15:31Missing authorization in WakeLock in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-95278"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-29T18:17:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Missing authorization in WakeLock in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)",
"id": "GHSA-f8w9-qhqq-34g5",
"modified": "2026-10-02T15:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-09-29T18:32:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-95278"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0856730748.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/497344014"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8WV-8GW9-XVC6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-29 12:31 – Updated: 2025-07-29 12:31The Bonanza – WooCommerce Free Gifts Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the xlo_optin_call() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to set the opt in status to success.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-6730"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-29T10:15:29Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Bonanza \u2013 WooCommerce Free Gifts Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the xlo_optin_call() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to set the opt in status to success.",
"id": "GHSA-f8wv-8gw9-xvc6",
"modified": "2025-07-29T12:31:21Z",
"published": "2025-07-29T12:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-6730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bonanza-woocommerce-free-gifts-lite/trunk/xl/includes/class-xl-opt-in-manager.php#L244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3c7a192b-25cc-4041-a72b-34fbd697045b?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8XW-G352-95P4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-27 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Missing Authorization vulnerability in BdThemes Ultimate Store Kit Elementor Addons allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Ultimate Store Kit Elementor Addons: from n/a through 2.3.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-24584"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-27T14:15:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in BdThemes Ultimate Store Kit Elementor Addons allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Ultimate Store Kit Elementor Addons: from n/a through 2.3.0.",
"id": "GHSA-f8xw-g352-95p4",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:29Z",
"published": "2025-01-27T15:30:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24584"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-store-kit/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-store-kit-elementor-addons-plugin-2-3-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F927-C8M5-JH63
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-01 15:31 – Updated: 2024-11-01 15:31Missing Authorization vulnerability in Uncanny Owl Uncanny Toolkit Pro for LearnDash allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Uncanny Toolkit Pro for LearnDash: from n/a through 4.1.4.0
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-37439"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-01T15:15:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Uncanny Owl Uncanny Toolkit Pro for LearnDash allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Uncanny Toolkit Pro for LearnDash: from n/a through\u00a04.1.4.0",
"id": "GHSA-f927-c8m5-jh63",
"modified": "2024-11-01T15:31:57Z",
"published": "2024-11-01T15:31:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37439"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/uncanny-toolkit-pro/wordpress-uncanny-toolkit-pro-for-learndash-plugin-4-1-4-1-subscriber-arbitrary-post-page-duplication-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F92C-PVC8-F6H9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-21 12:32 – Updated: 2025-02-21 12:32The Event Tickets and Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the 'ajax_ticket_delete' function in all versions up to, and including, 5.19.1.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to delete arbitrary Attendee tickets.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-1402"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-21T12:15:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Event Tickets and Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the \u0027ajax_ticket_delete\u0027 function in all versions up to, and including, 5.19.1.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to delete arbitrary Attendee tickets.",
"id": "GHSA-f92c-pvc8-f6h9",
"modified": "2025-02-21T12:32:13Z",
"published": "2025-02-21T12:32:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1402"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/event-tickets/tags/5.18.1/src/Tribe/Assets.php#L202"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/event-tickets/tags/5.18.1/src/Tribe/Metabox.php#L30"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/event-tickets/tags/5.18.1/src/Tribe/Metabox.php#L490"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordfence.freshdesk.com/a/tickets/375051"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/dbd838b6-7792-4378-8969-a70c6e16ff6a?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F92Q-3X4F-6FG8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-01-23 21:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in Mahmudul Hasan Arif FluentBoards fluent-boards allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects FluentBoards: from n/a through <= 1.91.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24561"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-23T15:16:13Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Mahmudul Hasan Arif FluentBoards fluent-boards allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects FluentBoards: from n/a through \u003c= 1.91.1.",
"id": "GHSA-f92q-3x4f-6fg8",
"modified": "2026-01-23T21:30:43Z",
"published": "2026-01-23T15:31:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24561"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/fluent-boards/vulnerability/wordpress-fluentboards-plugin-1-91-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F946-9QP6-VGCH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-18 16:34 – Updated: 2026-06-08 20:07Impact
Multiple Livewire components in the admin panel allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to mutate data without the required permission:
- Order detail Filament actions (cancel, mark paid, mark complete, capture payment, archive, start processing) were callable with
read_ordersonly and did not requireedit_orders.capturePaymentcould trigger an actual PSP capture. - Order shipments table actions (mark delivered, edit tracking) were callable with
browse_ordersonly. - Sub-form Livewire components for products (Edit, Inventory, Seo, Shipping, Files) had no authorization on
store(), so any authenticated panel user could mutate product data withoutedit_products. Settings/Team/Indexhad nomount()authorization at all — any authenticated user could create roles and delete other users.Settings/Team/RolePermissiongated its write actions on the read-onlyview_userspermission, allowing privilege escalation via the RBAC system itself.PaymentMethods,Currencies,Carrierstable toggles and per-record actions had no per-action permission check.Customers/Create::store()re-passed a Hidden_passwordform field into the create payload.
Several public Eloquent model properties on Livewire components were not #[Locked], allowing client-side ID tampering.
A stored XSS surface existed on the product barcode field, which is rendered through DNS1DFacade::getBarcodeHTML() with {!! !!}.
Patches
Fixed in v2.8.0. Upgrade via:
composer require shopper/admin:^2.8 shopper/cart:^2.8 shopper/core:^2.8
php artisan migrate
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to v2.8.0.
Resources
- Pull request: https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/pull/511
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- CWE-285 Improper Authorization
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "shopper/framework"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.8.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-47740"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-285",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-18T16:34:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-29T19:16:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Impact\n\nMultiple Livewire components in the admin panel allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to mutate data without the required permission:\n\n- Order detail Filament actions (cancel, mark paid, mark complete, capture payment, archive, start processing) were callable with `read_orders` only and did not require `edit_orders`. `capturePayment` could trigger an actual PSP capture.\n- Order shipments table actions (mark delivered, edit tracking) were callable with `browse_orders` only.\n- Sub-form Livewire components for products (Edit, Inventory, Seo, Shipping, Files) had no authorization on `store()`, so any authenticated panel user could mutate product data without `edit_products`.\n- `Settings/Team/Index` had no `mount()` authorization at all \u2014 any authenticated user could create roles and delete other users.\n- `Settings/Team/RolePermission` gated its write actions on the read-only `view_users` permission, allowing privilege escalation via the RBAC system itself.\n- `PaymentMethods`, `Currencies`, `Carriers` table toggles and per-record actions had no per-action permission check.\n- `Customers/Create::store()` re-passed a Hidden `_password` form field into the create payload.\n\nSeveral public Eloquent model properties on Livewire components were not `#[Locked]`, allowing client-side ID tampering.\n\nA stored XSS surface existed on the product barcode field, which is rendered through `DNS1DFacade::getBarcodeHTML()` with `{!! !!}`.\n\n## Patches\n\nFixed in `v2.8.0`. Upgrade via:\n\n```bash\ncomposer require shopper/admin:^2.8 shopper/cart:^2.8 shopper/core:^2.8\n```\n\n```shell\nphp artisan migrate\n```\n\n## Workarounds\n\nNone. Upgrade to `v2.8.0`.\n\n## Resources\n\n- Pull request: https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/pull/511\n- CWE-862 Missing Authorization\n- CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
"id": "GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch",
"modified": "2026-06-08T20:07:22Z",
"published": "2026-05-18T16:34:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/security/advisories/GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47740"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/issues/510"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/pull/511"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/commit/fcd0c5920588702df5b874f432b1042abd77a50b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shopperlabs/shopper/releases/tag/v2.8.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "shopper/framework: Authorization bypass in multiple Livewire admin components"
}
GHSA-F94M-4R58-RQ9P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 09:30 – Updated: 2026-09-15 09:30Affected versions of MISP fail to authorize a submitted sharing group in a specific event-edit path.
The vulnerable logic checked whether the acting user could use a sharing_group_id only when the request explicitly supplied distribution = 4. If the attacker instead omitted distribution but supplied a different sharing_group_id, that authorization branch was skipped. Later, MISP’s field-recovery logic restored the existing event distribution from storage. For events already configured with sharing-group distribution, the unauthorized sharing-group ID could therefore be saved.
The fix adds authorization checks in both the controller and Event::_edit() whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is supplied without distribution. The model now calls SharingGroup::checkIfAuthorised() before persisting the change.
Version affected: ≤2.5.45
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-91825"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-15T09:16:45Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Affected versions of MISP fail to authorize a submitted sharing group in a specific event-edit path.\n\n\nThe vulnerable logic checked whether the acting user could use a sharing_group_id only when the request explicitly supplied distribution = 4. If the attacker instead omitted distribution but supplied a different sharing_group_id, that authorization branch was skipped. Later, MISP\u2019s field-recovery logic restored the existing event distribution from storage. For events already configured with sharing-group distribution, the unauthorized sharing-group ID could therefore be saved.\n\n\nThe fix adds authorization checks in both the controller and Event::_edit() whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is supplied without distribution. The model now calls SharingGroup::checkIfAuthorised() before persisting the change.\n\n\n\nVersion affected: \u22642.5.45",
"id": "GHSA-f94m-4r58-rq9p",
"modified": "2026-09-15T09:30:32Z",
"published": "2026-09-15T09:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-91825"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/cf3ee4026"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-F94Q-9WQH-W63X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-02 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-02 12:31Craft CMS versions before 5.10.11 contain a broken access control vulnerability in the element-indexes/save-elements endpoint that allows control panel users to move entries into sections they cannot edit. Attackers with limited section permissions can relocate or publish entries to unauthorized sections by overwriting the sectionId attribute after initial authorization checks, bypassing the destination section permission validation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-84792"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-02T12:17:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Craft CMS versions before 5.10.11 contain a broken access control vulnerability in the element-indexes/save-elements endpoint that allows control panel users to move entries into sections they cannot edit. Attackers with limited section permissions can relocate or publish entries to unauthorized sections by overwriting the sectionId attribute after initial authorization checks, bypassing the destination section permission validation.",
"id": "GHSA-f94q-9wqh-w63x",
"modified": "2026-09-02T12:31:31Z",
"published": "2026-09-02T12:31:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-ccpq-mw3m-wwg2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84792"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/craft-cms-before-5.10.11-broken-access-control-via-element-indexes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.