CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
19892 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9XC3-M4R3-V8QC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-11 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-11 15:31Raven 2.0.0 through 3.0.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to join invite-only Public workspaces by ignoring the can_only_join_via_invite setting. Attackers with the Raven User role can call the join_workspace method to become persistent members, reading and posting in Public and Open channels.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-108731"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-11T13:17:17Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Raven 2.0.0 through 3.0.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to join invite-only Public workspaces by ignoring the can_only_join_via_invite setting. Attackers with the Raven User role can call the join_workspace method to become persistent members, reading and posting in Public and Open channels.",
"id": "GHSA-9xc3-m4r3-v8qc",
"modified": "2026-10-11T15:31:04Z",
"published": "2026-10-11T15:31:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-108731"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/The-Commit-Company/raven"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/The-Commit-Company/raven/blob/a732e10f9c8b2ab3446038396e3eea763da617e7/raven/api/workspaces.py#L58-L67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/The-Commit-Company/raven/blob/a732e10f9c8b2ab3446038396e3eea763da617e7/raven/permissions.py#L74-L90"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackmd.io/@haind03/frappe-raven-invite-only-workspace-flag-unenforced-20261010"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/raven-2.0.0-through-3.0.0-missing-authorization-via-join-workspace-invite-only-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XCC-HXHX-VP63
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-05 18:33 – Updated: 2026-11-06 18:35A flaw was found in the UserManagedPermissionService of the Keycloak authorization server. The UMA Protection API, which manages user permissions, fails to validate the resourceType field when a user creates a new policy. This allows an attacker to create a policy that applies to resources owned by other users, potentially leading to unauthorized access or modification of sensitive data across the entire realm.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-114232"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-05T17:17:39Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A flaw was found in the UserManagedPermissionService of the Keycloak authorization server. The UMA Protection API, which manages user permissions, fails to validate the resourceType field when a user creates a new policy. This allows an attacker to create a policy that applies to resources owned by other users, potentially leading to unauthorized access or modification of sensitive data across the entire realm.",
"id": "GHSA-9xcc-hxhx-vp63",
"modified": "2026-11-06T18:35:07Z",
"published": "2026-11-05T18:33:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-114232"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:95759"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:95760"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:95761"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:95762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-114232"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2558074"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XFX-G95J-MFFP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-01 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-01 12:31In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19422 privilege escalation was possible via user group links
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-103490"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-01T10:17:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19422 privilege escalation was possible via user group links",
"id": "GHSA-9xfx-g95j-mffp",
"modified": "2026-10-01T12:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-10-01T12:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-103490"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XH3-327M-WGFM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-09 18:30 – Updated: 2024-06-09 18:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in appscreo Easy Social Share Buttons.This issue affects Easy Social Share Buttons: from n/a through 9.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31307"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-09T18:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in appscreo Easy Social Share Buttons.This issue affects Easy Social Share Buttons: from n/a through 9.4.",
"id": "GHSA-9xh3-327m-wgfm",
"modified": "2024-06-09T18:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-06-09T18:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31307"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/easy-social-share-buttons3/wordpress-easy-social-share-buttons-plugin-9-4-multiple-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XHM-6W5P-335V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-07-28 00:00 – Updated: 2023-10-27 20:47Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier does not perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to request a manual backup.
Additionally, this HTTP endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
As of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:google-cloud-backup"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-36917"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-08-11T15:18:47Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-07-27T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin 0.6 and earlier does not perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to request a manual backup.\n\nAdditionally, this HTTP endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nAs of publication of this advisory, there is no fix.",
"id": "GHSA-9xhm-6w5p-335v",
"modified": "2023-10-27T20:47:26Z",
"published": "2022-07-28T00:00:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36917"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-07-27/#SECURITY-2656"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/07/27/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins Google Cloud Backup Plugin allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to request a manual backup."
}
GHSA-9XJG-HC8V-33C4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-03 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Missing Authorization vulnerability in peachpay PeachPay Payments allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects PeachPay Payments: from n/a through 1.117.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58634"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-03T15:15:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in peachpay PeachPay Payments allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects PeachPay Payments: from n/a through 1.117.4.",
"id": "GHSA-9xjg-hc8v-33c4",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:03Z",
"published": "2025-09-03T15:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58634"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/peachpay-for-woocommerce/vulnerability/wordpress-peachpay-payments-plugin-1-117-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XM2-GW56-WJ7M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-23 15:32 – Updated: 2026-09-24 19:00A missing authorization flaw was found in the OpenShift Cluster Logging Operator. The operator creates and forwards ServiceAccount tokens to output destinations without verifying that the ClusterLogForwarder creator has permission to use those credentials, allowing a delegated editor to exfiltrate SA tokens and escalate privileges.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/openshift/cluster-logging-operator"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.0.0-20260804174055-1864c2a9851d"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-10609"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-24T19:00:06Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-23T14:17:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A missing authorization flaw was found in the OpenShift Cluster Logging Operator. The operator creates and forwards ServiceAccount tokens to output destinations without verifying that the ClusterLogForwarder creator has permission to use those credentials, allowing a delegated editor to exfiltrate SA tokens and escalate privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-9xm2-gw56-wj7m",
"modified": "2026-09-24T19:00:06Z",
"published": "2026-06-23T15:32:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-10609"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openshift/cluster-logging-operator/pull/3383"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openshift/cluster-logging-operator/commit/1864c2a9851da90a3956f1b83c5f31b3b76e3514"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-10609"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483943"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openshift/cluster-logging-operator"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenShift Cluster Logging Operator missing authorization flaw"
}
GHSA-9XMC-5Q7J-X4FM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-11 18:31Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in the block alias route (Process::alias() in concrete/controllers/backend/block/process.php).It does not verify that the referenced block is genuinely orphaned on the target page, nor that the caller holds any permission over the source block. A user granted only an area-scoped add_block_to_area delegation on their own page can therefore pass any block ID on the site: the source block's content is duplicated into an area the rogue editor controls, disclosing that content, and the original block is then force-deleted in the same request, destroying arbitrary site content. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 5.9 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori from Tenzai for reporting.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-81909"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T18:16:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in the block alias route (Process::alias() in concrete/controllers/backend/block/process.php).It does not verify that the referenced block is genuinely orphaned on the target page, nor that the caller holds any permission over the source block. A user granted only an area-scoped add_block_to_area delegation on their own page can therefore pass any block ID on the site: the source block\u0027s content is duplicated into an area the rogue editor controls, disclosing that content, and the original block is then force-deleted in the same request, destroying arbitrary site content.\u00a0The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 5.9 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori from Tenzai for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-9xmc-5q7j-x4fm",
"modified": "2026-09-11T18:31:27Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T18:31:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81909"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/introduction/version-history/953-release-notes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XMX-X5WW-XMXJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-20 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Renzo Contact Form 7 AWeber Extension allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Contact Form 7 AWeber Extension: from n/a through 0.1.38.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-49988"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-20T15:15:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Renzo Contact Form 7 AWeber Extension allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Contact Form 7 AWeber Extension: from n/a through 0.1.38.",
"id": "GHSA-9xmx-x5ww-xmxj",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:32Z",
"published": "2025-06-20T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49988"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/integrate-contact-form-7-and-aweber/vulnerability/wordpress-contact-form-7-aweber-extension-plugin-0-1-38-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9XP6-XQFQ-5258
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-09 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-23 15:33Missing Authorization vulnerability in Conversios Conversios.io allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Conversios.io: from n/a through 6.5.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-51357"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-09T13:15:39Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Conversios Conversios.io allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Conversios.io: from n/a through 6.5.0.",
"id": "GHSA-9xp6-xqfq-5258",
"modified": "2026-04-23T15:33:40Z",
"published": "2024-12-09T15:31:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-51357"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/enhanced-e-commerce-for-woocommerce-store/vulnerability/wordpress-track-google-analytics-4-facebook-pixel-conversions-api-via-google-tag-manager-for-woocommerce-plugin-6-5-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.