CWE-862
Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
14657 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-RC62-FGVR-76JR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-09 18:30 – Updated: 2024-06-09 18:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in Data443 Tracking Code Manager.This issue affects Tracking Code Manager: from n/a through 2.1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31347"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-09T18:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Data443 Tracking Code Manager.This issue affects Tracking Code Manager: from n/a through 2.1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-rc62-fgvr-76jr",
"modified": "2024-06-09T18:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-06-09T18:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31347"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/tracking-code-manager/wordpress-tracking-code-manager-plugin-2-1-0-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RC6M-346Q-RGQ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 18:33 – Updated: 2026-06-26 18:33Pagekit CMS 1.0.18 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated users with the 'user: manage users' permission to escalate privileges by assigning arbitrary custom roles to themselves due to missing authorization checks in UserApiController::saveAction(). Attackers can assign themselves a custom role with the 'system: manage packages' permission and then upload and install a malicious PHP package through the admin package installer to achieve remote code execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-57518"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-26T17:16:34Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Pagekit CMS 1.0.18 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated users with the \u0027user: manage users\u0027 permission to escalate privileges by assigning arbitrary custom roles to themselves due to missing authorization checks in UserApiController::saveAction(). Attackers can assign themselves a custom role with the \u0027system: manage packages\u0027 permission and then upload and install a malicious PHP package through the admin package installer to achieve remote code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-rc6m-346q-rgq6",
"modified": "2026-06-26T18:33:59Z",
"published": "2026-06-26T18:33:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-57518"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/sermikr0/6f0a67e9d101746fcdb04827de137847"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/pagekit-cms-privilege-escalation-via-userapicontroller"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-RC79-85VX-66WV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-31 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Missing Authorization vulnerability in Strategy11 Team Tasty Recipes Lite allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Tasty Recipes Lite: from n/a through 1.1.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-62131"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-31T16:15:45Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Strategy11 Team Tasty Recipes Lite allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Tasty Recipes Lite: from n/a through 1.1.5.",
"id": "GHSA-rc79-85vx-66wv",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:28Z",
"published": "2025-12-31T18:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62131"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/tasty-recipes-lite/vulnerability/wordpress-tasty-recipes-lite-plugin-1-1-5-broken-access-control-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/tasty-recipes-lite/vulnerability/wordpress-tasty-recipes-lite-plugin-1-1-5-broken-access-control-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RC9R-X5J2-H9CQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:34 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:34An authorization bypass and PHP local-file-include vulnerability in the installation component of SugarCRM before 8.0, 8.0 before 8.0.7, 9.0 before 9.0.4, and 10.0 before 10.0.0 allows for unauthenticated remote code execution against a configured SugarCRM instance via crafted HTTP requests. (This is exploitable even after installation is completed.).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-7472"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-11-12T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An authorization bypass and PHP local-file-include vulnerability in the installation component of SugarCRM before 8.0, 8.0 before 8.0.7, 9.0 before 9.0.4, and 10.0 before 10.0.0 allows for unauthenticated remote code execution against a configured SugarCRM instance via crafted HTTP requests. (This is exploitable even after installation is completed.).",
"id": "GHSA-rc9r-x5j2-h9cq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:34:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:34:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7472"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.sugarcrm.com/Documentation/Sugar_Versions/10.0/Pro/Sugar_10.0.0_Release_Notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.sugarcrm.com/Resources/Security/sugarcrm-sa-2020-043"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-RCFF-H682-WC2J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-07 15:30 – Updated: 2023-03-14 21:30The BackupWordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information disclosure in versions up to, and including 3.12. This is due to missing authorization on the heartbeat_received() function that triggers on WordPress heartbeat. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level permissions and above to retrieve back-up paths that can subsequently be used to download the back-up.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-4931"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-07T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The BackupWordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information disclosure in versions up to, and including 3.12. This is due to missing authorization on the heartbeat_received() function that triggers on WordPress heartbeat. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level permissions and above to retrieve back-up paths that can subsequently be used to download the back-up.",
"id": "GHSA-rcff-h682-wc2j",
"modified": "2023-03-14T21:30:21Z",
"published": "2023-03-07T15:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4931"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=2683799%40backupwordpress\u0026new=2683799%40backupwordpress\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/747c86f4-118b-4a9c-899c-e9067d2c7a02"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCGX-VPHG-9XCG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 09:30 – Updated: 2026-06-24 09:30The Secufor_OAuth plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.7. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the WordPress site from its linked Secufor account by clearing the plugin's stored login token and user login configuration.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-7617"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T07:16:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Secufor_OAuth plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.7. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the WordPress site from its linked Secufor account by clearing the plugin\u0027s stored login token and user login configuration.",
"id": "GHSA-rcgx-vphg-9xcg",
"modified": "2026-06-24T09:30:46Z",
"published": "2026-06-24T09:30:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7617"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpoauth/tags/1.0.7/secuforoauth_login.php#L212"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpoauth/tags/1.0.7/secuforoauth_login.php#L220"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpoauth/trunk/secuforoauth_login.php#L212"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpoauth/trunk/secuforoauth_login.php#L220"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/61293c20-cabe-412d-94d1-1d0326d35a46?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCMC-Q9RJ-4WMQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-01 14:23 – Updated: 2026-06-01 14:23Summary
Type: Authorization bypass enabling workspace metadata + settings tampering. The PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id} endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member"). Any member can rewrite the workspace's name, description, and the settings JSON blob. The settings field is a free-form JSON object — depending on which downstream code reads it, this becomes a configuration-injection primitive for any setting the platform exposes there.
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 63-74; services/workspace_service.py's update() method.
Root cause: Depends(require_workspace_member) resolves to default min_role="member". WorkspaceService.update(workspace_id, name, description, settings) writes the new fields to the workspace row without any caller-permission check. The role hierarchy (MemberService.has_role) is never consulted.
Affected Code
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 63-74.
@router.patch("/{workspace_id}", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)
async def update_workspace(
workspace_id: str,
body: WorkspaceUpdate,
user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # <-- BUG: defaults to min_role="member"
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)
ws = await ws_svc.update(workspace_id, body.name, body.description, body.settings) # <-- writes any value
if ws is None:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Workspace not found")
return WorkspaceResponse.model_validate(ws)
Why it's wrong: workspace name and settings are owner-tier fields. Renaming the workspace to a profanity is a low-impact griefing vector; rewriting the JSON settings blob is potentially a much higher-impact configuration injection (depending on what fields downstream code reads from settings, the attacker may flip feature flags, redirect webhook URLs, change LLM provider keys for shared configs, disable audit logging, etc.). The require_workspace_member(min_role) parameter is implemented and unused. This endpoint should require owner.
Exploit Chain
- Attacker is a member of workspace
Wwith role "member". State: attacker holds JWT. - Attacker sends
PATCH /workspaces/WwithAuthorization: Bearer <attacker_jwt>and body{"name": "Compromised", "description": "Owned by attacker", "settings": {"allow_public_invite": true, "ai_provider_url": "https://attacker.example/v1"}}. State: control flow entersupdate_workspace. require_workspace_member(W, attacker)passes.WorkspaceService.update(W, ...)writes the three fields. State: workspaceWnow has attacker-chosen name, description, and settings.- The settings JSON is read by any downstream code that consults workspace settings (LLM proxying, invite flows, webhook routing). If the deployment uses settings-keyed configuration overrides, those overrides now point at attacker-controlled endpoints.
- Final state: with one member-level token plus one PATCH, the attacker rewrites the workspace's metadata and settings, with effects ranging from cosmetic (rename) to substantive (settings-keyed config injection).
Security Impact
Severity: sec-moderate. CVSS 6.5: network attack, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope unchanged, no confidentiality directly (though settings rewrites may enable indirect data exfiltration via attacker-pointed integration URLs), high integrity, no availability claim.
Attacker capability: rewrite any workspace's name, description, and settings JSON. The actual blast radius depends on what fields the deployment reads from settings — but that field is documented as a free-form JSON blob, so any future configuration the platform adds there becomes attacker-tunable.
Preconditions: praisonai-platform is deployed multi-tenant; attacker has any membership token in the target workspace.
Differential: source-inspection-verified. With the suggested fix below, member-tier tokens fail the gate and the metadata rewrite is rejected with 403.
Suggested Fix
--- a/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py
+++ b/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py
@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@
@router.patch("/{workspace_id}", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)
async def update_workspace(
workspace_id: str,
body: WorkspaceUpdate,
- user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
+ user: AuthIdentity = Depends(_require_workspace_owner), # see member-update-role advisory for helper
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)
ws = await ws_svc.update(workspace_id, body.name, body.description, body.settings)
if ws is None:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Workspace not found")
return WorkspaceResponse.model_validate(ws)
Defence-in-depth: validate the keys allowed in body.settings against an allowlist so the field cannot become an arbitrary config-injection primitive even for owners. The four companion workspace-mutation endpoints (add_member, update_member_role, remove_member, delete_workspace) exhibit the same default-min-role gap and are filed as their own advisories.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "praisonai-platform"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-47411"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-01T14:23:08Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n**Type:** Authorization bypass enabling workspace metadata + settings tampering. The `PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}` endpoint is gated only by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` (default `min_role=\"member\"`). Any member can rewrite the workspace\u0027s `name`, `description`, and the `settings` JSON blob. The settings field is a free-form JSON object \u2014 depending on which downstream code reads it, this becomes a configuration-injection primitive for any setting the platform exposes there.\n**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py`, lines 63-74; `services/workspace_service.py`\u0027s `update()` method.\n**Root cause:** `Depends(require_workspace_member)` resolves to default `min_role=\"member\"`. `WorkspaceService.update(workspace_id, name, description, settings)` writes the new fields to the workspace row without any caller-permission check. The role hierarchy (`MemberService.has_role`) is never consulted.\n\n## Affected Code\n\n**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py`, lines 63-74.\n\n```python\n@router.patch(\"/{workspace_id}\", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)\nasync def update_workspace(\n workspace_id: str,\n body: WorkspaceUpdate,\n user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # \u003c-- BUG: defaults to min_role=\"member\"\n session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),\n):\n ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)\n ws = await ws_svc.update(workspace_id, body.name, body.description, body.settings) # \u003c-- writes any value\n if ws is None:\n raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=\"Workspace not found\")\n return WorkspaceResponse.model_validate(ws)\n```\n\n**Why it\u0027s wrong:** workspace name and settings are owner-tier fields. Renaming the workspace to a profanity is a low-impact griefing vector; rewriting the JSON `settings` blob is potentially a much higher-impact configuration injection (depending on what fields downstream code reads from `settings`, the attacker may flip feature flags, redirect webhook URLs, change LLM provider keys for shared configs, disable audit logging, etc.). The `require_workspace_member(min_role)` parameter is implemented and unused. This endpoint should require owner.\n\n## Exploit Chain\n\n1. Attacker is a member of workspace `W` with role \"member\". State: attacker holds JWT.\n2. Attacker sends `PATCH /workspaces/W` with `Authorization: Bearer \u003cattacker_jwt\u003e` and body `{\"name\": \"Compromised\", \"description\": \"Owned by attacker\", \"settings\": {\"allow_public_invite\": true, \"ai_provider_url\": \"https://attacker.example/v1\"}}`. State: control flow enters `update_workspace`.\n3. `require_workspace_member(W, attacker)` passes. `WorkspaceService.update(W, ...)` writes the three fields. State: workspace `W` now has attacker-chosen name, description, and settings.\n4. The settings JSON is read by any downstream code that consults workspace settings (LLM proxying, invite flows, webhook routing). If the deployment uses settings-keyed configuration overrides, those overrides now point at attacker-controlled endpoints.\n5. Final state: with one member-level token plus one PATCH, the attacker rewrites the workspace\u0027s metadata and settings, with effects ranging from cosmetic (rename) to substantive (settings-keyed config injection).\n\n## Security Impact\n\n**Severity:** sec-moderate. CVSS 6.5: network attack, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope unchanged, no confidentiality directly (though settings rewrites may enable indirect data exfiltration via attacker-pointed integration URLs), high integrity, no availability claim.\n**Attacker capability:** rewrite any workspace\u0027s name, description, and settings JSON. The actual blast radius depends on what fields the deployment reads from `settings` \u2014 but that field is documented as a free-form JSON blob, so any future configuration the platform adds there becomes attacker-tunable.\n**Preconditions:** `praisonai-platform` is deployed multi-tenant; attacker has any membership token in the target workspace.\n**Differential:** source-inspection-verified. With the suggested fix below, member-tier tokens fail the gate and the metadata rewrite is rejected with 403.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\n```diff\n--- a/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\n+++ b/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py\n@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@\n @router.patch(\"/{workspace_id}\", response_model=WorkspaceResponse)\n async def update_workspace(\n workspace_id: str,\n body: WorkspaceUpdate,\n- user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),\n+ user: AuthIdentity = Depends(_require_workspace_owner), # see member-update-role advisory for helper\n session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),\n ):\n ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)\n ws = await ws_svc.update(workspace_id, body.name, body.description, body.settings)\n if ws is None:\n raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=\"Workspace not found\")\n return WorkspaceResponse.model_validate(ws)\n```\n\nDefence-in-depth: validate the keys allowed in `body.settings` against an allowlist so the field cannot become an arbitrary config-injection primitive even for owners. The four companion workspace-mutation endpoints (`add_member`, `update_member_role`, `remove_member`, `delete_workspace`) exhibit the same default-min-role gap and are filed as their own advisories.",
"id": "GHSA-rcmc-q9rj-4wmq",
"modified": "2026-06-01T14:23:08Z",
"published": "2026-06-01T14:23:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-rcmc-q9rj-4wmq"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can rewrite workspace name, description, and settings via PATCH /workspaces/{id}"
}
GHSA-RCQF-RGP8-QR4J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-28 06:32 – Updated: 2024-11-28 06:32The Image Alt Text plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data| due to a missing capability check on the iat_add_alt_txt_action and iat_update_alt_txt_action AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to update the alt text on arbitrary images.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-11918"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-28T06:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Image Alt Text plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data| due to a missing capability check on the iat_add_alt_txt_action and iat_update_alt_txt_action AJAX actions in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to update the alt text on arbitrary images.",
"id": "GHSA-rcqf-rgp8-qr4j",
"modified": "2024-11-28T06:32:43Z",
"published": "2024-11-28T06:32:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-11918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3188755%40image-alt-text\u0026new=3188755%40image-alt-text\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/22143fe3-e599-4b44-99c0-ba66d88ff5d6?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCQP-HX94-8H2W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-16 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ashan Perera EventON allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects EventON: from n/a through 2.4.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48116"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-16T16:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ashan Perera EventON allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects EventON: from n/a through 2.4.4.",
"id": "GHSA-rcqp-hx94-8h2w",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:07Z",
"published": "2025-05-16T18:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48116"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/eventon-lite/vulnerability/wordpress-eventon-2-4-4-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCQQ-5H75-3J53
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-28 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:32The WP Meta SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized options update due to a missing capability check on the wpmsGGSaveInformation function in versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with subscriber-level access to update google analytics options maintained by the plugin. This vulnerability occurred as a result of the plugin relying on nonce checks as a means of access control, and that nonce being accessible to all authenticated users regardless of role.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-1022"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-28T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP Meta SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized options update due to a missing capability check on the wpmsGGSaveInformation function in versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with subscriber-level access to update google analytics options maintained by the plugin. This vulnerability occurred as a result of the plugin relying on nonce checks as a means of access control, and that nonce being accessible to all authenticated users regardless of role.",
"id": "GHSA-rcqq-5h75-3j53",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:32:02Z",
"published": "2023-02-28T15:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2870465/wp-meta-seo/trunk?contextall=1\u0026old=2869205\u0026old_path=%2Fwp-meta-seo%2Ftrunk#file2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=2870465%40wp-meta-seo\u0026new=2870465%40wp-meta-seo\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/702f9d3b-5d33-4215-ac76-9aae3162d775"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/702f9d3b-5d33-4215-ac76-9aae3162d775?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.