Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
9055 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-17623 (GCVE-0-2026-17623)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 16:34 – Updated: 2026-08-06 03:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Langflow is affected OS Command Injection in Model Context Protocol features
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of the command field in MCP server configurations.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-05 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282147 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Langflow OSS |
Affected:
1.0.0 , ≤ 1.10.3
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17623",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-05T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T03:55:39.675Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Langflow OSS",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "CVEs reported to IBM: CVE-2026-8446 by odgrso (GMO CyberSecurity by Ierae, Inc.); CVE-2026-17626 by Thai Son Dinh (VinSOC Labs, (R\u0026amp;D)."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of the command field in MCP server configurations.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of the command field in MCP server configurations."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T16:34:56.709Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282147"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases"
}
],
"title": "Langflow is affected OS Command Injection in Model Context Protocol features"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17623",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T16:34:22.418Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-27T20:52:42.230Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T03:55:39.675Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17566 (GCVE-0-2026-17566)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-31 16:00 – Updated: 2026-08-01 03:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
pgAdmin 4: RCE via backslash-escape mismatch in Import/Export Data query guard (incomplete defense, sibling gap to CVE-2025-13780)
Summary
pgAdmin 4's Import/Export Data tool builds a psql \copy (...) command line by interpolating a user-supplied SQL query into a Jinja template and passing the rendered line to psql via --command. To stop an attacker from breaking out of the (...) wrapper, create_import_export_job() (route POST /import_export/job/<sid>, gated only by the ordinary, commonly-granted tools_import_export_data permission) validated the query with a hand-written parenthesis-balance checker, _is_query_parens_balanced(). That checker always treated a backslash before a single quote (\') as escaping the quote, i.e. as if standard_conforming_strings were off. PostgreSQL has defaulted standard_conforming_strings to on since 9.1 (2010), the default on every PostgreSQL version pgAdmin 4 currently supports (13-18); under that default psql's own \copy tokenizer treats \ as an ordinary character, so a single quote immediately after it closes the string literal. A query such as SELECT 'a\') TO PROGRAM 'echo pwned' x' was therefore accepted as "balanced" by pgAdmin's checker (which believed the ) was still inside the string), while psql, run through the actual rendered command line, closes the string at that point and treats the following ) as the end of the wrapping \copy (...) subquery, exposing an attacker-chosen TO PROGRAM '<command>' clause that psql executes via popen() -- independent of a subsequent syntax error later on the same line. This is the same class of bug as CVE-2025-12762/CVE-2025-13780 (RCE via psql meta-command/COPY injection during PLAIN-format dump restore), reached through an independently written defense in a different module (Import/Export Data rather than Restore) that had its own, different logic bug (inverted backslash-escape semantics rather than a BOM-defeated regex anchor).
The fix rejects any backslash inside a single-quoted string in the query outright, rather than picking one of the two possible psql interpretations. This is intentionally conservative: because the correct interpretation of \ depends on the target server's standard_conforming_strings setting, which the checker cannot reliably know at validation time, refusing the query is safer than guessing.
This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of _is_query_parens_balanced() before 9.18.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-31 00:00 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10213 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/14… | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pgadmin.org | pgAdmin 4 |
Affected:
0 , < 9.18
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17566",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-31T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-01T03:56:13.838Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Import/Export Data"
],
"product": "pgAdmin 4",
"programFiles": [
"https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/pgadmin/tools/import_export/__init__.py"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4",
"vendor": "pgadmin.org",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Arpit Jain (arpitjain099)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Ashesh Vashi \u003cashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com\u003e"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "pgAdmin 4\u0027s Import/Export Data tool builds a psql \\copy (...) command line by interpolating a user-supplied SQL query into a Jinja template and passing the rendered line to psql via --command. To stop an attacker from breaking out of the (...) wrapper, create_import_export_job() (route POST /import_export/job/\u003csid\u003e, gated only by the ordinary, commonly-granted tools_import_export_data permission) validated the query with a hand-written parenthesis-balance checker, _is_query_parens_balanced(). That checker always treated a backslash before a single quote (\\\u0027) as escaping the quote, i.e. as if standard_conforming_strings were off. PostgreSQL has defaulted standard_conforming_strings to on since 9.1 (2010), the default on every PostgreSQL version pgAdmin 4 currently supports (13-18); under that default psql\u0027s own \\copy tokenizer treats \\ as an ordinary character, so a single quote immediately after it closes the string literal. A query such as SELECT \u0027a\\\u0027) TO PROGRAM \u0027echo pwned\u0027 x\u0027 was therefore accepted as \"balanced\" by pgAdmin\u0027s checker (which believed the ) was still inside the string), while psql, run through the actual rendered command line, closes the string at that point and treats the following ) as the end of the wrapping \\copy (...) subquery, exposing an attacker-chosen TO PROGRAM \u0027\u003ccommand\u003e\u0027 clause that psql executes via popen() -- independent of a subsequent syntax error later on the same line. This is the same class of bug as CVE-2025-12762/CVE-2025-13780 (RCE via psql meta-command/COPY injection during PLAIN-format dump restore), reached through an independently written defense in a different module (Import/Export Data rather than Restore) that had its own, different logic bug (inverted backslash-escape semantics rather than a BOM-defeated regex anchor).\n\nThe fix rejects any backslash inside a single-quoted string in the query outright, rather than picking one of the two possible psql interpretations. This is intentionally conservative: because the correct interpretation of \\ depends on the target server\u0027s standard_conforming_strings setting, which the checker cannot reliably know at validation time, refusing the query is safer than guessing.\n\nThis issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of _is_query_parens_balanced() before 9.18."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Threat model: same as CVE-2025-12762/13780. An authenticated pgAdmin user (server mode) holding only the ordinary, routinely-granted \"Import/Export Data\" tool permission (tools_import_export_data) -- not an admin-only permission -- submits a single crafted POST to /import_export/job/\u003csid\u003e with is_query_export true and a query field containing the payload. No further user interaction, no special server-side configuration, and no elevated pgAdmin role is required. Successful exploitation runs an arbitrary OS command as the pgAdmin application server\u0027s service account, which is a privilege escalation beyond anything the Import/Export Data permission is meant to grant (database-query access, not host command execution) -- Scope Changed. Impact is full compromise of the pgAdmin host (C/I/A: High)."
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Same reasoning as the CVSS 3.1 entry: network-reachable, low privilege required, no user interaction, host RCE compromises both pgAdmin\u0027s own authority (SC/SI/SA: High) and the underlying system data/integrity/availability (VC/VI/VA: High)."
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-115",
"description": "CWE-115 Misinterpretation of Input",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T16:00:22.738Z",
"orgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
"shortName": "PostgreSQL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10213"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/1496fabe28c9f825f6bac0f0d000d9d3276322c3"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "pgAdmin 4: RCE via backslash-escape mismatch in Import/Export Data query guard (incomplete defense, sibling gap to CVE-2025-13780)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
"assignerShortName": "PostgreSQL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17566",
"datePublished": "2026-07-31T16:00:22.738Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-27T14:43:12.802Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-01T03:56:13.838Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17499 (GCVE-0-2026-17499)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-04 16:31 – Updated: 2026-09-04 17:30
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Debug Server
Summary
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
Severity
4.4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-04 17:30 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285844 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | i |
Affected:
7.6
Affected: 7.5 Affected: 7.4 Affected: 7.3 cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17499",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-04T17:30:33.661124Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T17:30:43.375Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "i",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T16:31:04.122Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285844"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM i Release\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5770-SS1\u003cbr/\u003ePTF Number(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePTF Download Link(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.6\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ11305\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11305\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11305\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.5\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ11306\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11306\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11306\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.4\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ11307\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11307\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11307\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.3\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ11308\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11308\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11308\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM i Release5770-SS1\nPTF Number(s)PTF Download Link(s)7.6SJ11305 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11305 7.5SJ11306 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11306 7.4SJ11307 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11307 7.3SJ11308 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ11308 \n\n\n\nIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products."
}
],
"title": "IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Debug Server"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17499",
"datePublished": "2026-09-04T16:31:04.122Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-26T17:10:40.328Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T17:30:43.375Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17497 (GCVE-0-2026-17497)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-26 14:38 – Updated: 2026-07-27 14:49
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
NoteGen arbitrary OS command execution via Tauri shell:allow-execute for bash/python
Summary
NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.
Severity
8.3 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-27 14:48 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/codexu/note-gen/commit/00064a4… | patch |
| https://github.com/codexu/note-gen/releases/tag/n… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/codexu/note-gen | product |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17497",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-27T14:48:49.754931Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T14:49:03.628Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/codexu/note-gen",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "note-gen",
"product": "NoteGen",
"programFiles": [
"src-tauri/capabilities/default.json",
"src-tauri/capabilities/desktop.json"
],
"repo": "git://github.com/codexu/note-gen",
"vendor": "codexu",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.32.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAffects the NoteGen desktop application on a default installation. Exploitation requires the ability to run script in the NoteGen webview (for example via a separate XSS issue) and then invoke the Tauri shell execute API. No non-default capability configuration is required on affected versions.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Affects the NoteGen desktop application on a default installation. Exploitation requires the ability to run script in the NoteGen webview (for example via a separate XSS issue) and then invoke the Tauri shell execute API. No non-default capability configuration is required on affected versions."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Yuval Moravchick"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "JFrog Security Research"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eNoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user\u0027s machine.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user\u0027s machine."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA proof of concept obtains JavaScript execution in the webview (via malicious skill-driven chat XSS) and then calls window.__TAURI__.core.invoke(\u0027plugin:shell|execute\u0027, { program: \u0027bash\u0027, args: [\u0027-c\u0027, \u0027\u0026lt;command\u0026gt;\u0027], ... }) to open Calculator and exfiltrate local files to an attacker-controlled server.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A proof of concept obtains JavaScript execution in the webview (via malicious skill-driven chat XSS) and then calls window.__TAURI__.core.invoke(\u0027plugin:shell|execute\u0027, { program: \u0027bash\u0027, args: [\u0027-c\u0027, \u0027\u003ccommand\u003e\u0027], ... }) to open Calculator and exfiltrate local files to an attacker-controlled server."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-549",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-549 Local Execution of Code"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-17",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-17 Using Malicious Files"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1249",
"description": "CWE-1249 Application-Level admin tool with inconsistent view of underlying operating system",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-276",
"description": "CWE-276 Incorrect default permissions",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-26T14:38:08.960Z",
"orgId": "48a46f29-ae42-4e1d-90dd-c1676c1e5e6d",
"shortName": "JFROG"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Fix: remove unrestricted shell execute for bash/python; harden skill script execution",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codexu/note-gen/commit/00064a4a8ec4177d51094ffb3e15bf0758009c1f"
},
{
"name": "NoteGen v0.32.0 release",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codexu/note-gen/releases/tag/note-gen-v0.32.0"
},
{
"name": "NoteGen repository",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codexu/note-gen"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade to NoteGen 0.32.0 or later. The fix removes shell:allow-execute entries that permitted bash, python, and python3 with attacker-controlled arguments from the default Tauri capabilities, closing the webview-to-OS command execution path.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to NoteGen 0.32.0 or later. The fix removes shell:allow-execute entries that permitted bash, python, and python3 with attacker-controlled arguments from the default Tauri capabilities, closing the webview-to-OS command execution path."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability discovered and PoC verified"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fix released in NoteGen v0.32.0 (shell capability lockdown)"
}
],
"title": "NoteGen arbitrary OS command execution via Tauri shell:allow-execute for bash/python",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "48a46f29-ae42-4e1d-90dd-c1676c1e5e6d",
"assignerShortName": "JFROG",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17497",
"datePublished": "2026-07-26T14:38:08.960Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-26T14:37:51.448Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T14:49:03.628Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17431 (GCVE-0-2026-17431)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 23:12 – Updated: 2026-08-13 13:09
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
PDF::WebKit versions through 1.2 for Perl allow OS command injection via a 2-arg open() of the output path in to_pdf and of stylesheet paths in _style_tag_for
Summary
PDF::WebKit versions through 1.2 for Perl allow OS command injection via a 2-arg open() of the output path in to_pdf and of stylesheet paths in _style_tag_for.
to_pdf reads the generated PDF back from its path argument, and _style_tag_for reads each entry of the stylesheets list, by assigning the path to a local @ARGV and reading it with the diamond operator, which opens each @ARGV element with Perl's 2-arg open(). A value that begins or ends with a pipe ("| cmd", "cmd |") is run as a command rather than opened as a file, and one that begins with a redirect ("> path", ">> path") opens that path for write or append. to_file forwards its path argument to to_pdf and reaches the same read.
Any caller that forwards untrusted input as the output path or as a stylesheets entry can run a command under the process UID; with the "cmd |" form the command's output is returned in place of the PDF, and with the "> path" form the named file is truncated. Stylesheets may only be added to an HTML source, so a URL or file source exposes the output path alone.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-13 13:09 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MITHALDU | PDF::WebKit |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.2
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T02:53:50.907Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/13/3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17431",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-13T13:09:23.223596Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T13:09:27.451Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://cpan.org/modules",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "PDF-WebKit",
"product": "PDF::WebKit",
"programFiles": [
"lib/PDF/WebKit.pm"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "PDF::WebKit::to_pdf"
},
{
"name": "PDF::WebKit::to_file"
},
{
"name": "PDF::WebKit::_style_tag_for"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/kingpong/perl-PDF-WebKit",
"vendor": "MITHALDU",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "PDF::WebKit versions through 1.2 for Perl allow OS command injection via a 2-arg open() of the output path in to_pdf and of stylesheet paths in _style_tag_for.\n\nto_pdf reads the generated PDF back from its path argument, and _style_tag_for reads each entry of the stylesheets list, by assigning the path to a local @ARGV and reading it with the diamond operator, which opens each @ARGV element with Perl\u0027s 2-arg open(). A value that begins or ends with a pipe (\"| cmd\", \"cmd |\") is run as a command rather than opened as a file, and one that begins with a redirect (\"\u003e path\", \"\u003e\u003e path\") opens that path for write or append. to_file forwards its path argument to to_pdf and reaches the same read.\n\nAny caller that forwards untrusted input as the output path or as a stylesheets entry can run a command under the process UID; with the \"cmd |\" form the command\u0027s output is returned in place of the PDF, and with the \"\u003e path\" form the named file is truncated. Stylesheets may only be added to an HTML source, so a URL or file source exposes the output path alone."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-73",
"description": "CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T23:12:57.958Z",
"orgId": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
"shortName": "CPANSec"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kingpong/perl-PDF-WebKit/issues/8"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://security.metacpan.org/patches/P/PDF-WebKit/1.2/CVE-2026-17431-r1.patch"
},
{
"url": "https://wkhtmltopdf.org/status.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "PDF::WebKit versions through 1.2 for Perl allow OS command injection via a 2-arg open() of the output path in to_pdf and of stylesheet paths in _style_tag_for",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "No fixed release is available. Apply the patch, which reads both paths with a 3-arg open so the value is never interpreted as a command or redirect.\n\nOtherwise, do not pass untrusted input as the output path to to_pdf or to_file, or as an entry in the stylesheets list.\n\nNote that the wkhtmltopdf project is no longer being developed, and users of this package should migrate to alternative solutions."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cpansec-cna-tool 0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
"assignerShortName": "CPANSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17431",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T23:12:57.958Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-25T08:39:34.495Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T13:09:27.451Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17420 (GCVE-0-2026-17420)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 17:25 – Updated: 2026-08-12 18:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in SQL
Summary
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper neutralization of special elements in an SQL parameter.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-12 18:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283289 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | i |
Affected:
7.6
Affected: 7.5 Affected: 7.4 Affected: 7.3 cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17420",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T18:58:19.034419Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T18:58:30.204Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "i",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper neutralization of special elements in an SQL parameter.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper neutralization of special elements in an SQL parameter."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:25:50.601Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283289"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM i Release\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5770-SS1\u003cbr/\u003ePTF Number(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePTF Download Link(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.6\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10867\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10867\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10867\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.5\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10868\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10868\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10868\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.4\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10869\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10869\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10869\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.3\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10870\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10870\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10870\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\n\nIBM i Release5770-SS1\nPTF Number(s)PTF Download Link(s)7.6SJ10867 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10867 7.5SJ10868 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10868 7.4SJ10869 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10869 7.3SJ10870 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10870 \n\n\n\nIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products."
}
],
"title": "IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in SQL"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17420",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T17:25:50.601Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-25T05:55:59.639Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T18:58:30.204Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17417 (GCVE-0-2026-17417)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 19:32 – Updated: 2026-08-13 13:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM i is Affected By Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities [, ]
Summary
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of shell metacharacters.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-13 03:56 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283275 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | i |
Affected:
7.6
Affected: 7.5 Affected: 7.4 Affected: 7.3 cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17417",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-13T03:56:03.748580Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T13:18:40.405Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "i",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of shell metacharacters.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of shell metacharacters."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T19:32:53.665Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283275"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM i Release\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5770-SS1\u003cbr/\u003ePTF Number(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePTF Download Link(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.6\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10968\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10968\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10968\u00a0\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.5\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10967\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10967\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10967\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.4\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10966\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10966\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10966\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.3\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10964\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10964\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10964\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\n\nIBM i Release5770-SS1\nPTF Number(s)PTF Download Link(s)7.6SJ10968 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10967 7.4SJ10966 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10966 7.3SJ10964 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10964 \n\n\n\nIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products."
}
],
"title": "IBM i is Affected By Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities [, ]"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17417",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T19:32:53.665Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-25T05:46:26.881Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T13:18:40.405Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17347 (GCVE-0-2026-17347)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-31 15:59 – Updated: 2026-08-01 03:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
pgAdmin 4: OS command injection in MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK via untrusted username substitution
Summary
The MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK setting, introduced in pgAdmin 4 7.2, lets an administrator configure an external command that returns a per-user encryption key, with %u in the configured string replaced by the current user's name. The previous implementation substituted the username directly into the command string and executed the result with subprocess.Popen(..., shell=True). Because the username can originate from an external authentication source (OAuth/OIDC claims, Kerberos, webserver auth) rather than a value pgAdmin fully controls, a username containing shell metacharacters (';', '$()', backticks, pipes, '&&', newlines) allowed an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as the pgAdmin service account in any deployment where the configured hook string uses %u.
Fix tokenises the trusted, administrator-configured hook string into an argument vector first (using shlex in POSIX-quoting mode, with backslash-escaping disabled so Windows-style paths are not mis-parsed), substitutes the untrusted username into the individual argv elements, and executes with shell=False. The username is therefore always confined to a single argv element; any shell metacharacters it contains are inert. Administrators whose MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK previously relied on shell features (pipes, redirection, environment-variable expansion, globbing) within the hook string itself must move that logic into the invoked script, since it is no longer interpreted by a shell.
This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from 7.2 before 9.17.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-31 00:00 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10191 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/ea… | patch |
| https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/e7… | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pgadmin.org | pgAdmin 4 |
Affected:
7.2 , < 9.17
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17347",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-31T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-01T03:56:12.755Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Master Password Hook"
],
"product": "pgAdmin 4",
"programFiles": [
"https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/pgadmin/utils/master_password.py",
"https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/blob/master/web/config.py"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4",
"vendor": "pgadmin.org",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thiago Pereira (@B1gN0Se)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Dave Page \u003cpage@pgadmin.org\u003e"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Ashesh Vashi \u003cashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com\u003e"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Ashesh Vashi \u003cashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com\u003e"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Kundan Sable \u003ckundan.sable@enterprisedb.com\u003e"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK setting, introduced in pgAdmin 4 7.2, lets an administrator configure an external command that returns a per-user encryption key, with %u in the configured string replaced by the current user\u0027s name. The previous implementation substituted the username directly into the command string and executed the result with subprocess.Popen(..., shell=True). Because the username can originate from an external authentication source (OAuth/OIDC claims, Kerberos, webserver auth) rather than a value pgAdmin fully controls, a username containing shell metacharacters (\u0027;\u0027, \u0027$()\u0027, backticks, pipes, \u0027\u0026\u0026\u0027, newlines) allowed an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as the pgAdmin service account in any deployment where the configured hook string uses %u.\n\nFix tokenises the trusted, administrator-configured hook string into an argument vector first (using shlex in POSIX-quoting mode, with backslash-escaping disabled so Windows-style paths are not mis-parsed), substitutes the untrusted username into the individual argv elements, and executes with shell=False. The username is therefore always confined to a single argv element; any shell metacharacters it contains are inert. Administrators whose MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK previously relied on shell features (pipes, redirection, environment-variable expansion, globbing) within the hook string itself must move that logic into the invoked script, since it is no longer interpreted by a shell.\n\nThis issue affects pgAdmin 4: from 7.2 before 9.17."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Threat model (per reporter\u0027s submitted rating): an authenticated pgAdmin user whose username is sourced from an external identity provider (OAuth/OIDC, Kerberos, or webserver auth passed through to pgAdmin) in a deployment where MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK\u0027s configured string contains %u. Attack Complexity is High because exploitation depends on this non-default configuration (hook enabled with %u, combined with an external-auth username source under attacker influence) rather than being reachable in a default deployment. Scope is Unchanged: the resulting command execution runs as the pgAdmin service account, which is the same security authority the web application process itself already runs under -- it is a consequence of pgAdmin\u0027s own process, not a boundary crossing into an unrelated authority. Confidentiality/Integrity/Availability are High because arbitrary command execution as that account can read, modify, or destroy anything the account can reach."
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Same reasoning as the CVSS 3.1 entry: authenticated low-privilege user with an externally-sourced username triggers arbitrary OS command execution as the pgAdmin service account, contingent on the non-default MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK/%u configuration (AT:N here refers to no additional authentication target beyond the login itself; the configuration dependency is captured via AC:H in the 3.1 vector and is implicit in this scenario). VC:H/VI:H/VA:H for the service account\u0027s own reach; SC:N/SI:N/SA:N since that reach is the application\u0027s own process authority, not a distinct subsequent system."
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-88",
"description": "CWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command (\u0027Argument Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-31T15:59:16.588Z",
"orgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
"shortName": "PostgreSQL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/10191"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/ea7e798aac27174d2bacee1d6e136bed76a95e23"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/e7a85767314e7b0fe0b35fe80b9c1af38f48dff6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "pgAdmin 4: OS command injection in MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK via untrusted username substitution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
"assignerShortName": "PostgreSQL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17347",
"datePublished": "2026-07-31T15:59:16.588Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-25T02:52:54.844Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-01T03:56:12.755Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17248 (GCVE-0-2026-17248)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 17:35 – Updated: 2026-08-12 18:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Debug Server
Summary
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in an OS command.
Severity
7.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-12 18:55 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283276 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | i |
Affected:
7.6
Affected: 7.5 Affected: 7.4 Affected: 7.3 cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17248",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T18:55:26.345687Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T18:55:33.411Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "i",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in an OS command.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in an OS command."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T17:35:51.918Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283276"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ccolgroup\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003ccol/\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM i Release\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5770-SS1\u003cbr/\u003ePTF Number(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePTF Download Link(s)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.6\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10899\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10899\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10899\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.5\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10903\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10903\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10903\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.4\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10915\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10915\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10915\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7.3\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eSJ10916\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10916\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10916\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\n\nIBM i Release5770-SS1\nPTF Number(s)PTF Download Link(s)7.6SJ10899 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10899 7.5SJ10903 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10903 7.4SJ10915 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10915 7.3SJ10916 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10916 \n\n\n\nIBM recommends users running unsupported versions of affected products upgrade to a supported and fixed version of affected products."
}
],
"title": "IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Debug Server"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17248",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T17:35:51.918Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-24T22:00:33.143Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T18:55:33.411Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-17186 (GCVE-0-2026-17186)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-14 19:22 – Updated: 2026-08-17 15:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM Db2 Mirror for i is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
Summary
IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary CL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in a command.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-17 15:53 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283359 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Db2 Mirror for i |
Affected:
7.4
Affected: 7.5 Affected: 7.6 cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-17186",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-17T15:53:17.229456Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-17T15:53:25.879Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:db2_mirror_for_i:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Db2 Mirror for i",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary CL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in a command.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary CL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in a command."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T19:22:46.540Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283359"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM i Release\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e5770-DBM PTF Numbers\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003ePTF Download Link\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003eSJ10947\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10947\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10947\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003eSJ10961\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10961\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10961\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003eSJ10948\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10948\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10948\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now.\n\n\n\n\n\nIBM i Release\n\n\n\n5770-DBM PTF Numbers\n\n\n\nPTF Download Link\n\n\n\n7.4\n\n\n\nSJ10947\n\n\n\n https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10947 \n\n\n\n7.5\n\n\n\nSJ10961\n\n\n\n https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10961 \n\n\n\n7.6\n\n\n\nSJ10948\n\n\n\n https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/fix-information?legacy=SJ10948 \n\n\n\n\n\n https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral"
}
],
"title": "IBM Db2 Mirror for i is affected by multiple vulnerabilities"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-17186",
"datePublished": "2026-08-14T19:22:46.540Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-24T18:44:52.306Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-17T15:53:25.879Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.